This document outlines grading criteria for assessing principles of marketing presentations on a scale of 5 to 1. It evaluates presentations on identifying the problem and analyzing it, drawing appropriate conclusions, teamwork, oral communication skills, delivery style, and use of visual aids. The highest grades of 9-10 are for demonstrations of thorough understanding, logical and coherent analysis, highly appropriate conclusions, best use of team skills, and professional presentation with polished delivery and integrated aids. Lower grades are for more superficial, inconsistent or unsupported work.
A Study of The Aggressiveness Behavior of Senior High School Students of de La Salle Lipa As Predicted by The Perceived Parenting Styles of Their Parents
This document outlines grading criteria for assessing principles of marketing presentations on a scale of 5 to 1. It evaluates presentations on identifying the problem and analyzing it, drawing appropriate conclusions, teamwork, oral communication skills, delivery style, and use of visual aids. The highest grades of 9-10 are for demonstrations of thorough understanding, logical and coherent analysis, highly appropriate conclusions, best use of team skills, and professional presentation with polished delivery and integrated aids. Lower grades are for more superficial, inconsistent or unsupported work.
This document outlines grading criteria for assessing principles of marketing presentations on a scale of 5 to 1. It evaluates presentations on identifying the problem and analyzing it, drawing appropriate conclusions, teamwork, oral communication skills, delivery style, and use of visual aids. The highest grades of 9-10 are for demonstrations of thorough understanding, logical and coherent analysis, highly appropriate conclusions, best use of team skills, and professional presentation with polished delivery and integrated aids. Lower grades are for more superficial, inconsistent or unsupported work.
This document outlines grading criteria for assessing principles of marketing presentations on a scale of 5 to 1. It evaluates presentations on identifying the problem and analyzing it, drawing appropriate conclusions, teamwork, oral communication skills, delivery style, and use of visual aids. The highest grades of 9-10 are for demonstrations of thorough understanding, logical and coherent analysis, highly appropriate conclusions, best use of team skills, and professional presentation with polished delivery and integrated aids. Lower grades are for more superficial, inconsistent or unsupported work.
PRINCIPLES OF MARKETING ASSESSMENT GRADING CRITERIA
grade 9-10 8-9 7-8 6-7 5-6
5 Identify the problem Demonstrates thorough understanding of the scope and the scale of the problem located precisely within its contet ! time and circumstances Demonstrates awareness of the scope and scale of the problem with broad parameters of contet" time and circumstances Is able to identify problem and gi#e indications of the outcomes$implications that ma%e it problematic Is able to identify$name the problem with some reference to contet Does not identify the problem or identification is insufficient 6 &nalysis of the problem 'a%e a logical and coherent approach at all steps in the analysis and demonstrates high le#el of critical thin%ing throughout 'he analysis demonstrates a logical approach and eemplifies coherent and critical thin%ing 'he analysis demonstrates a logical approach and generally displays critical thin%ing 'he analysis is mainly ogical in approach and displays an ability to engage in critical thin%ing 'he analysis is insufficiently logical in approach and displays little or no ability to engage in critical thin%ing 5 (onclusion )s* and$or recommendations &ll conclusions and$or recommendations are highly appropriate and$or creati#e 'he conclusions and$or recommendations are appropriate and$or creati#e 'he conclusions and$or recommendation are appropriate and with an element of creati#ity +ome good points emerge from the discussion of options" and alternati#e but the ,conclusion, are not de-monstrabl-y appropriate. 'he conclusions$recommendati ons are not appropriate and there is little$no e#idence of critical /udgment , 'eam cohesion and contribution to re0uired output 'he team made the best use of the %nowledge" s%ills and attributes of the members to produce the full re0uired output 'he team made good use of %nowledge" s%ills and attributes of the members to produce the re0uired output +ome alignment was e#ident between the %nowledge" s%ills and attributes of the team members and the re0uired output 'here is e#idence of an effort to align the %nowledge" s%ills and attributes of the team members with the re0uired output1 wea%ened by team issues 2nsuccessful to aligning the %nowledge" s%ills and attributes of the team members with the re0uired output. +erious team issued remained unsol#ed , 3ral communication structure" format and organisation of presentation (ontent is comprehensi#e and arranged logically" structure is creati#ely tailored for the audience" and clearly signposted throughout1 presentation meets time (ontent pro#ides good co#erage of topic with logical se0uence1 structure is well tailored for the audience" with clear signposting" meets time limits and is well- paced to a#ailable time &de0uate co#erage of content and follows logical se0uence1 organi4ed and signposted appropriately for the audience1 time limits adhered to1 presentation is mainly well-paced 5asic co#erage of content1 attempts to follow logical se0uence1 some awareness of appropriate organisation and signposting for audience1 some timing issues Inade0uate content that lac%s coherence" not organi4ed or signposted to communicate ade0uately to audience1 timing issues limits" is ecellently paced to a#ailable time - Deli#ery style )#erbal and non #erbal 6ighly professional" well paced and con#incing presentation1 #oice clear and confident1 maintained #ery good audience connection with positi#e eye contact and body language1 minimum reliance on written notes 7rofessional" well paced and con#incing presentation1 #oice consistently lear and confident1 maintained good audience connection with positi#e eye contact and body language1 minimum reliance on written notes 7resentation is generally professional" #ocal deli#ery con#eys meaning. 8ith only minor lapses in features li%e audibility" clarity and pace1 eye contact and body language helps to connect with audience1 minimum reliance on written notes 7resentation shows some success in professional elements" #oice con#eys basic meaning but lac%s audibility" clarity" eye contact and body language does not connect with audience" some o#er-reliance on written notes 7resentation lac%s persuasi#eness" #ocal deli#ery not clear" no eye contact" inappropriate body language1 o#er reliance on notes - 2se of #isual aids" other e0uipment 2se of aids is proficient" imaginati#e and highly rele#ant1 they are consistently and s%illfully integrated to maimi4e impact in transmitting meaning and engaging audience &ids are thoughtfully chosen and constructed" they are appropriately used and integrated to maimi4e impact in transmitting meaning and engaging audience +uitable aids are used but not effecti#ely ) too many" too few" low rele#ance*1 some attempt to integrate the aids to contribute to the impact of the presentation and relate to audience &ids are used but the 0uality$rele#ance is inconsistent1 they only contribute slightly to the impact of the presentation and the transmission of meaning &ny aids that are used are inappropriate" not integrated and either do not add to meaning
A Study of The Aggressiveness Behavior of Senior High School Students of de La Salle Lipa As Predicted by The Perceived Parenting Styles of Their Parents