The document provides proofs that three different relations are equivalence relations:
1) The relation R on a set A is antisymmetric if and only if R intersect R inverse is a subset of the diagonal relation.
2) The relation R on ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((a,b),(c,d)) is in R if and only if ad=bc.
3) The relation R on functions from positive integers to positive integers such that (f,g) is in R if and only if f is theta of g.
The document provides proofs that three different relations are equivalence relations:
1) The relation R on a set A is antisymmetric if and only if R intersect R inverse is a subset of the diagonal relation.
2) The relation R on ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((a,b),(c,d)) is in R if and only if ad=bc.
3) The relation R on functions from positive integers to positive integers such that (f,g) is in R if and only if f is theta of g.
The document provides proofs that three different relations are equivalence relations:
1) The relation R on a set A is antisymmetric if and only if R intersect R inverse is a subset of the diagonal relation.
2) The relation R on ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((a,b),(c,d)) is in R if and only if ad=bc.
3) The relation R on functions from positive integers to positive integers such that (f,g) is in R if and only if f is theta of g.
1. Show that the relation R on a set A is antisymmetric if and only if RR
1 is a subset of the diagonal relation = {(a, a)|a A}. Proof: Assume that R is antisymmetric, but R R 1 . Then there are elements a, b A with a = b such that (a, b) RR 1 . Thus, (a, b) R, and (a, b) R 1 . The latter implies that (b, a) R by the denition of R 1 . But then we have (a, b) R, and (b, a) R, with a = b, contradicting that R is antisymmetric. Thus, R R 1 . Now assume that R R 1 , but R is not antisymmetric. Then there are elements a, b A with a = b such that (a, b) R and (b, a) R. Then (a, b) R 1 (since (b, a) R), so that (a, b) RR 1 . Since a = b, this contradicts that R R 1 . Thus, R is antisymmetric. 2. Let R be the relation on the set of ordered pairs of positive integers such that ((a, b), (c, d)) R if and only if ad = bc. Show that R is an equivalence relation. Proof: We need to show that R is reexive, symmetric, and transitive. Reexive: Since ab = ba for all positive integers, ((a, b), (a, b)) R for all (a, b). Thus R is reexive. Symmetric: Notice that if ad = bc, then cb = da for all positive integers a, b, c, and d. Thus ((a, b), (c, d)) R implies that ((c, d), (a, b)) R, so R is symmetric. Transitive: Assume that ((a, b), (c, d)) R and ((c, d), (e, f)) R. Then ad = bc and cf = de. Solv- ing the second for c, we get c = de/f, and plugging it into the rst we get ad = b(de/f). Multiplying both sides by f, and canceling the d on both sides yields af = be. Thus ((a, b), (e, f)) R. Thus R is transitive. 3. Let R be the relation on the set of functions from Z + to Z + such that (f, g) R if and only if f is (g). Show that R is an equivalence relation. Proof: We need to show that R is reexive, symmetric, and transitive. Reexive: Since 1 f(x) f(x) 1 f(x) for all x 1, f = (f), so R is reexive. Symmetric: If f = (g), then there exists positive constance C 1 , C 2 , and x 0 such that C 1 g(x) f(x) C 2 g(x) for all x x 0 . This implies that g(x) 1 C 1 f(x) and g(x) 1 C 2 f(x) for all x x 0 , which is equivalent to 1 C 2 f(x) g(x) 1 C 1 f(x) for all x x 0 . Thus g = (f), and R is symmetric. Transitive: If f = (g), then there exists positive constance C 1 , C 2 , and x 0 such that C 1 g(x) f(x) C 2 g(x) for all x x 0 . Similarly if g = (h), then there exists positive constance C 3 , C 4 , and x 1 such that C 3 h(x) g(x) C 4 h(x) for all x x 1 . Then f(x) C 1 g(x) C 1 (C 3 h(x)) for all x max{x 0 , x 1 }, and f(x) C 2 g(x) C 2 (C 4 h(x)) for all x max{x 0 , x 1 } Thus, C 1 C 3 h(x) f(x) C 2 C 4 h(x) for all x max{x 0 , x 1 }. and f = (h). Thus R is transitive. 1