This document outlines the guidelines and criteria for an accreditation visit and evaluation. It is divided into 9 criteria with multiple items under each criterion. The criteria include vision and mission, program outcomes, curriculum, student performance, faculty contributions, facilities, academic support, governance and finances, and continuous improvement. Points are assigned to each item and the institution will be evaluated on how many points it receives in each area. The goal is to assess how well the institution and its programs meet the described criteria.
This document outlines the guidelines and criteria for an accreditation visit and evaluation. It is divided into 9 criteria with multiple items under each criterion. The criteria include vision and mission, program outcomes, curriculum, student performance, faculty contributions, facilities, academic support, governance and finances, and continuous improvement. Points are assigned to each item and the institution will be evaluated on how many points it receives in each area. The goal is to assess how well the institution and its programs meet the described criteria.
This document outlines the guidelines and criteria for an accreditation visit and evaluation. It is divided into 9 criteria with multiple items under each criterion. The criteria include vision and mission, program outcomes, curriculum, student performance, faculty contributions, facilities, academic support, governance and finances, and continuous improvement. Points are assigned to each item and the institution will be evaluated on how many points it receives in each area. The goal is to assess how well the institution and its programs meet the described criteria.
This document outlines the guidelines and criteria for an accreditation visit and evaluation. It is divided into 9 criteria with multiple items under each criterion. The criteria include vision and mission, program outcomes, curriculum, student performance, faculty contributions, facilities, academic support, governance and finances, and continuous improvement. Points are assigned to each item and the institution will be evaluated on how many points it receives in each area. The goal is to assess how well the institution and its programs meet the described criteria.
Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Self Remarks 1 Criterion - 1 Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives 75
2 Criterion - 2 Programme Outcomes 200
3 Criterion - 3 Programme Curriculum 100
4 Criterion - 4 Students Performance in the Programme 100
5 Criterion- 5 Faculty Contributions 100
6 Criterion -6 Facilities and Technical Support 100
7 Criterion -7 Academic Support Units and Teaching- Learning Process 150
8 Criterion -8 Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 100
9 Criterion -9 Continuous Improvement 75
1000
GUIDELINES AND OPERATING PRACTICES FOR ACCREDITATION VISIT AND EVALUATION Criterion - 1: Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 1.1 Mission and Vision 5 2 1.2 Programme Educational Objectives 10 3 1.3 Attainment of Programme Educational Objectives 25 4 1.4 Assessment of attainment of Programme Educational Objectives 30 5 1.5 Indicate how results of assessment of achievement of PEOs have been used for redefining PEOs 5 75
Criterion - 2: Programme Outcomes Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 2.1 Definition and Validation of Course Outcomes and Programme Outcomes 20 2 2.2 Attainment of Programme Outcomes 50 3 2.3 Assessment of attainment of Programme Outcomes 125 4 2.4 Indicate how results of assessment of achievement of POs have been used for redefining POs 5 200
Criterion - 3: Programme Curriculum Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 3.1 Curriculum 20 2 3.2 Curriculum components and relevance to programme outcomes 25 3 3.3 Industry interaction/internship 30 4 3.4 Illustrate the processes used to identify the curricular gaps to the attainment of the COs/POs 10 5 3.5 Indicate the content beyond syllabus imparted for the attainment of the COs/POs 10 6 3.6 Course Syllabi 5 100
Criterion - 4: Students Performance in the Programme Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 4.1 Admission intake of the programme 25 2 4.2 Success rate 20 3 4.3 Academic performance 20 4 4.4 Placement and higher studies 20 5 4.5 Professional activities 15 100
Criterion 5: Faculty Contributions Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 5.1 Student-teacher ratio 30 2 5.2 Faculty qualifications 20 3 5.3 Faculty Training 20 4 5.4 Faculty retention 5 5 5.5 Faculty research publications 5 6 5.6 Faculty intellectual property rights 5 7 5.7 Faculty R&D and consultancy work 5 8 5.8 Faculty interaction with outside world 10 100
Criterion 6: Facilities and Technical Support Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 6.1 Classrooms 10 2 6.2 Faculty rooms 10 3 6.3 Laboratories including computing facility 60 4 6.4 Technical manpower support 20 100
Criterion 7 : Academic Support Units and Teaching-Learning Process Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 7.1 Academic process 15 2 7.2 Academic support units and common facilities 30 3 7.3 Tutorial classes/remedial classes/mentoring 15 4 7.4 Teaching in Programme - Specific lab and workshop 25 5 7.5 Teaching evaluation process : Feedback system 20 6 7.6 Innovative Projects and learning beyond syllabus 15 7 7.7 Training placement and Entrepreneurship Cell 15 8 7.8 Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities 15 150
Criterion 8: Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 8.1 Campus Infrastructure and Facility 10 2 8.2 Organisation, Governance, and Transparency 10 3 8.3 Budget Allocation, Utilisation, and Public Accounting 20 4 8.4 Programme Specific Budget Allocation, Utilisation 20 5 8.5 Library 25 6 8.6 Internet 5 7 8.7 Safety norms and checks 5 8 8.8 Counselling and Emergency Medical Care and First-aid 5 100
Criterion 9: Continuous Improvement Sr. NO Item Item description Max points Points Awarded Remarks 1 9.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students 5 2 9.2 Improvement in Academic Performance Index of Students 5 3 9.3 Improvement in Student-Teacher Ratio 5 4 9.4 Enhancement of Faculty Qualification Index 5 5 9.5 Improvement in Faculty Research Publications, R&D Work and Consultancy Work 10 6 9.6 Continuing Education 10 7 9.7 New Facility Created 15 8 9.8 Overall Improvement since last accreditation, if any, otherwise, since the commencement of the programme 20 75