WORD OF GOD

... through Bertha Dudde

8797
God only created beings of equal perfection .... .
only e!anated one being .... "ucifer# the bearer of light ....
$ho! created for %yself in order to gi&e %yself and %y lo&e to
hi!# and $hich therefore $as shaped in %y i!age $hich ca!e
forth fro! %e in supre!e perfection# $hich arose before %e as a
thought and already e'isted in its abundance of light and
strength .... as could not other$ise be possible because nothing
i!perfect could e!erge fro! %e.
created this being for %y o$n happiness# because %y
funda!ental nature is lo&e and lo&e constantly $ants to gi&e
pleasure# but prior to this no spiritual being e'isted $hich $as
able to recei&e %y lo&e. t $as a !irror i!age of %yself# sa$
%yself in %y e'ternalised being# it $as# to so!e e'tent# %y
second (elf# $hich li)e$ise unified lo&e# $isdo! and !ight $ithin
itself so that it could not be anything else but %yself# and $hich
therefore $as also ine'pressibly happy because it $as constantly
infused by %y strength of lo&e.
$anted an identical being ne't to %e because %y creati&e
strength !ade %e e'ceedingly happy and $anted to pro&ide a
being $ith the sa!e happiness in order to ta)e pleasure in its
bliss.
%y funda!ental substance is lo&e# and this lo&e# in turn# is
strength. %y strength of lo&e $as unable to re!ain inacti&e and
constantly brought spiritual creations into being.
*et no+one apart fro! %e $as able to ta)e pleasure in these
creations and this !oti&ated %e to create a li)eness of %yself ....
a being $hich had the sa!e nature as %yself# $ith the
difference that it had a beginning# $hereas ,! e&erlasting.
en-oyed beatitudes beyond !easure by radiating %y strength of
lo&e into %y created being $hich then# per!eated by the sa!e
strength of lo&e# also $anted to be creati&ely acti&e and $as able
to do so because it $as co!pletely free.
t $as utterly absorbed in %y lo&e# a constant e'change of lo&e
too) place# for the lo&e ga&e $as returned to %e by the being in
the sa!e $ay. .he being $as fond of %e and totally engrossed
$ith %e. ,nd that resulted in uni!peded illu!ination $ith lo&e#
uni!peded illu!ination $ith strength $hich $anted to beco!e
acti&e. ,nd since the creation of the first spirit of light had gi&en
%e e'tre!e happiness# its bliss also consisted of the creation of
the sa!e beings .... thus fro! both of our strength of lo&e a
countless host of the sa!e beings e!erged# $hich $ere all
supre!ely perfect and e'ceedingly blissful.
.his process has already been e'plained to you though %y
re&elations. ,nd yet you )eep as)ing questions as to $ho really
$as the creator of the ele&ated and highest beings of light#
because in your state as a hu!an being you already ha&e a
different concept of the originally created spirit of light# since you
are no longer in possession of full realisation as a result of sin.
/o$e&er# you forget that all original spirits ha&e their origin in %e
and the bearer of light .... that the latter used %y strength for
the creation of all spiritual beings .... that you therefore ca!e
forth fro! %e and fro! hi!# but his $ill used %y strength $hich
flo$ed to hi! $ithout restriction. ,nd therefore you $ill also
understand that the bearer of light had an e'ceptional position#
because he $as the only one $ho $as called into life by %e.
,lthough he certainly lost his strength and po$er through his
apostasy fro! %e# he lost his realisation and fell into the deepest
abyss# he is ne&ertheless still the sa!e originally created spirit#
$hich is no$ as acti&e as a direct opposite as he $as for!erly
de&oted to %e $ith burning lo&e and en-oyed supre!e
beatitudes.
,ll other fallen beings $ere dissol&ed in their funda!ental
substance# the once e!anated strength $as reshaped into the
!ost !anifold creations. .he bearer of light# ho$e&er# ha&ing lost
all light# re!ained the being he $as fro! the start# he !erely
turned into the opposite# so that he beca!e %y opposite pole
and no$ serves %e as an opposite pole in the return of the
fallen spiritual beings. For these spiritual beings had once been
put to the test to ac)no$ledge %e or hi!# and they follo$ed him
and beca!e lost.
,nd no$ they $ill be tested ti!e and again# for %y e'isting
ad&ersary insists on his clai! on the fallen beings# -ust as $ill
not surrender the! since they e!erged fro! %y strength of
lo&e# but the being itself !a)es the decision. %y ad&ersary
asserts his rights and influences the beings in a negati&e sense#
$hile try to $in the beings o&er for %e through influencing
the! in a positi&e $ay.
,nd countless beings support %e0 they# too# $ere created by hi!
but they recognised %e as the source of strength fro! $hich he
also originated. ,nd they ha&e re!ained in beatitude because
they still recei&e %y strength of lo&e continuously and are acti&e
in a creati&e and shaping $ay.
/o$e&er# self+a$are beings $ere only e'ternalised by %e and the
bearer of light in unison# and these self+a$are beings $ill indeed
continue to e'ist fore&er. Only the once fallen beings lost their
self+a$areness for a certain period of ti!e in order to be able to
acco!plish the ascent fro! the abyss again in a dissol&ed state.
But they $ill recei&e their self+a$areness again as soon they
ha&e to pass their final test of $ill as a hu!an being.
But %y spiritual ad&ersary !ust be ta)en into account at all
ti!es# for he remained $hat he $as .... and he $ill continue to
re!ain $ho he is for infinitely long periods of ti!e0 e&en so# one
day he $ill change his nature again and reshape hi!self into
lo&e# and he# too# $ill be blissfully happy $ithout li!itation again.
.hen %y lo&e $ill per!eate hi! again# as it $as in the beginning.
,!en
8798 12ontinuation of no. 87973
God only created beings of equal perfection .... .
/o$e&er# after the creation of %y first being of light nothing of
inferior &alue e!erged fro! %e %yself and this being of light.
*our hu!an thin)ing is still li!ited because you are not perfect
yet# and thus the thought occurred to you that the beings# ha&ing
e!erged fro! our !utual lo&e# cannot be put on par $ith the
first+created being. But this thought is !isguided# because it $as
the sa!e strength and the sa!e $ill of lo&e $hich brought the!
to life# therefore there $ere only e&er supre!ely perfect
beings .... true i!ages of %yself ....
*ou hu!ans indeed co!pare your fello$ hu!an beings# you can
detect !ore !ature and i!!ature traits of nature# consequently
you also assu!e that you can !a)e such e&aluations regarding
the originally created beings. But surely you understand that
such &aluations are not appropriate concerning the creations
$hich ca!e forth fro! %e and %y lo&e.
,ll creations of a spiritual nature $ere only of the highest
perfection# and in particular the created beings $ere of supre!e
perfection.
.he fact that part of the! ne&ertheless fell does not entitle you
to assu!e that these 4fallen5 beings $ere less perfect and fell
because their creator "ucifer# due to his recurring re-ection of %y
strength of lo&e# had created inferior beings. For e&en a nu!ber
of the first beings $hich $ere created by our $ill of lo&e follo$ed
hi! $hen he turned a$ay fro! %e and proceeded to$ards the
abyss. 6or did the indi&idual beings5 strength of $ill differ0 it
$as# ho$e&er# free .... and that e'plains e&erything. For freedo!
)no$s no li!itations# and a free $ill !ust be able to de&elop in
all directions.
.he indi&idual beings5 $rong thin)ing is the second e'planation
for the fall. .he ability to thin) also allo$ed for $rong thin)ing#
to $rongly interpret %y Word $hich the beings# due to their
constant illu!ination of lo&e# heard $ithin the!sel&es. .hey $ere
not co!pelled to interpret the Word only in one direction .... by
&irtue of their faculty of thought they $ere also able to apply a
different !eaning to it and so they did $hen they re-ected %y
lo&e# for thereby they also lost their po$er of perception and
their thin)ing beca!e confused.
n addition# the li!itless flo$ of strength of lo&e !ade the!
arrogant# so that in their abundance of strength they belie&ed
the!sel&es to ha&e the sa!e po$er# so that their lo&e for their
2reator therefore di!inished and the being !ore or less !ade
de!ands .... $hich $as de!onstrated by their desire to &isibly
present %yself to the beings .... .hey belie&ed the!sel&es to be
entitled to it# and this $rong $ay of thin)ing $as transferred on
to the! by %y first+created being. t e'pressed this desire
despite the fact of )no$ing full $ell that it had to re!ain
unfulfilled $ere %y created beings to continue to e'ist.
.hus it can certainly not be said that any of the fallen beings has
!erely been a &icti! of its creator5s $ill# for e&ery single being
had the right of self+deter!ination and $as also in possession of
brightest realisation. But e&ery fallen being beca!e spiritually
arrogant and forgot# or refused to ac)no$ledge# that it had
originated fro! %e .... that I therefore had been its 2reator and
Father# against Who! its re&olt $as the $orst sin $hich the being
$ould ne&er e&er be able to redee! by itself again.
,ll beings $ere created in equal perfection# and the fact that a
nu!ber of equally created beings re!ained loyal to %e is already
proof in itself of a greater than greater guilt .... they only did not
relinquish their lo&e for %e .... $hereas those $hich had 4fallen5
re-ected %y lo&e# and this $as their i!!ense original sin $hich
$as subsequently intended to be redee!ed by One Who
belonged to the beings $hich re!ained faithful to %e.
.he fallen beings cannot be e'cused by so!e )ind of
i!perfection# $ith lac)ing perception# less illu!ination or a $ea)
$ill. .hey had the sa!e nature as those $ho re!ained loyal to
%e# yet in a$areness of their i!!easurable strength they
arrogantly no longer accepted %y strength of lo&e and $ere
thereby also depri&ed of all strength. .hey !ust laboriously gain
strength again if they $ant to beco!e $hat they $ere in the
beginning.
,ny )ind of i!perfection $ould ha&e been an e'cuse for a being5s
apostasy# but this did not e'ist# and $hen "ucifer sa$ the
countless !ultitudes of created beings in brightest illu!ination
and supre!e strength $hich had e!erged fro! his $ill by using
%y strength he e'alted hi!self abo&e %e because he $as unable
to behold %e# but he hi!self $as &isible in his !agnificence to
the countless !ultitudes of spirits.
/o$e&er# untold original spirits re!ained faithful to %e# they
$ere created to be e'actly the sa!e as the fallen spirits and not
ad&antaged by %e in any $ay# they !erely returned their infinite
lo&e to %e $hich per!eated the! and $hich they constantly
recei&ed fro! %e and thus beca!e increasingly !ore blissful#
whereas the love of the fallen beings became a selfish
love which no longer wanted to please but only wanted to
take.
.his process is and $ill re!ain ine'plicable to you hu!ans
because it $as a spiritual process $hich can only be understood
by the spirit0 ne&ertheless# the circu!stances $hich !oti&ated
%e into bringing the !aterial $orld and its creations into being
can be roughly e'plained to you#
and ti!e and again $ill try to enlighten you# as far as your
intellect is able to grasp it# and correct any !isguided opinion#
since one single !isguided thought is already enough for you to
construct a $rong edifice of ideas $hich you $ill no longer be
able to dis!antle and yet you $ill be far re!o&ed fro! the truth.
*ou $ould also do $ell not to brood o&er things $hich are
irrele&ant for your soul5s sal&ation .... $hich only sho$ so!e )ind
of cra&ing for )no$ledge# the satisfaction of $hich does not
contribute in the slightest to$ards attaining full !aturity of soul.
For $hat you need to )no$ $ill be con&eyed to you by %e# yet
al$ays on condition that your o$n !aturity of soul $ill deter!ine
the !easure hand out ....
*et you shall al$ays )no$ that ,! supre!ely perfect# that
e&erything is based on %y lo&e# $isdo! and !ight and that no
i!perfections can be present $hen this bond $ith %e e'ists. ,nd
this e'isted at the creation of the beings# for the being
e'ternalised .... the bearer of light .... $as !ost inti!ately
de&oted to %e and $as therefore able to recei&e boundless
beatitudes through the influ' of %y strength of lo&e. ,nd it used
this strength of lo&e again in accordance $ith %y $ill# because its
$ill $as in line $ith %ine as long as $e $ere united by deepest
lo&e.
7&ery act of creation# ho$e&er# necessitates the flo$ of %y
strength of lo&e# and therefore e&ery created being had to be
called perfect $hen it $as brought into life. .he fact that it then
changed into the opposite and beca!e an i!perfect being $as
purely the result of its free $ill# $hich $as the sa!e as %ine as
long as the being5s lo&e belonged to %e.
When it resisted %y lo&e it had to lea&e the eternal order and
continued to possess brightest illu!ination until it decided to turn
a$ay fro! %e for good. Only then did it lose its realisation# only
then its spirit dar)ened# and only then did it beco!e %y
opposite. t $as no longer a di&ine being but adopted all the
qualities of the one $ho first re&o)ed his lo&e for %e and beca!e
%y ad&ersary.
/enceforth it forfeited its perfection# it beca!e poorly shaped
and $as hostile !inded to$ards %e# %y strength of lo&e $as no
longer able to touch it# and thus all spiritual substances hardened
$hich subsequently reshaped into !aterial creations .... into
the co!plete opposite $hich it had been in the &ery beginning.
6e&ertheless# this fallen spiritual being al$ays has the
opportunity to regain its original state if it is $illing to abandon
its resistance to %e and once again &oluntarily allo$s itself to be
illu!inated by %y strength of lo&e.
.he apostasy fro! %e happened out of free $ill# and the return
to %e !ust therefore also ta)e place out of free $ill. .hen the
being $ill be and re!ain infinitely happy again ....
,!en
8ublished by friends of ne$ re&elations of God 9 nfor!ation#
do$nload of all translated re&elations# the!e+boo)lets at:
http:;;$$$.bertha+dudde.info;english;inde'.ht!l

http:;;en.bertha+dudde.org;