This paper reviews studies evaluating behavioral HIV prevention interventions for African Americans in the United States. Several journals were selected and studies were included if their samples had at least 100 or more African American participants, or if African Americans were examined separately with samples under 100. The studies' quality was assessed based on randomization, attrition, protection against contamination, and the training of intervention facilitators. The review found some good studies that randomized participants and had attrition under 30%, but also studies with significant methodological limitations. The paper's applicability to local health organizations was limited since behavior changes needed may differ and benefit balances are unclear without provided confidence intervals.
This paper reviews studies evaluating behavioral HIV prevention interventions for African Americans in the United States. Several journals were selected and studies were included if their samples had at least 100 or more African American participants, or if African Americans were examined separately with samples under 100. The studies' quality was assessed based on randomization, attrition, protection against contamination, and the training of intervention facilitators. The review found some good studies that randomized participants and had attrition under 30%, but also studies with significant methodological limitations. The paper's applicability to local health organizations was limited since behavior changes needed may differ and benefit balances are unclear without provided confidence intervals.
This paper reviews studies evaluating behavioral HIV prevention interventions for African Americans in the United States. Several journals were selected and studies were included if their samples had at least 100 or more African American participants, or if African Americans were examined separately with samples under 100. The studies' quality was assessed based on randomization, attrition, protection against contamination, and the training of intervention facilitators. The review found some good studies that randomized participants and had attrition under 30%, but also studies with significant methodological limitations. The paper's applicability to local health organizations was limited since behavior changes needed may differ and benefit balances are unclear without provided confidence intervals.
This paper reviews studies evaluating behavioral HIV prevention interventions for African Americans in the United States. Several journals were selected and studies were included if their samples had at least 100 or more African American participants, or if African Americans were examined separately with samples under 100. The studies' quality was assessed based on randomization, attrition, protection against contamination, and the training of intervention facilitators. The review found some good studies that randomized participants and had attrition under 30%, but also studies with significant methodological limitations. The paper's applicability to local health organizations was limited since behavior changes needed may differ and benefit balances are unclear without provided confidence intervals.
Nama / kelompok : kelompok 18 NIM : Judul paper : California collaboration in HIV prevention research : dissemination proect Instruksi : 1! isilah kolom"kolom di ba#ah ini $! beri %aris ba#ah den%an tinta merah atau stabilo pada ba%ian paper &an% telah anda telaah 1. TELAAH KELENGKAPAN FORMAT PAPER : Item telaah 'da / tidak (sebutkan halamann&a) Judul (Title) Ada ( page 1 ) 'bstrak dan/atau * in%kasan (Abstract and or Summary) Ada ( page 1 ) Red sig +endahuluan ( Introduction, background ) Ada ( page 1 ! " ) Gree sig ,ahan dan Cara ( Method ) Ada ( page " # $ ) B%&e sig Hasil ( Result ) Ada ( page $ # ' ) -iskusi ( Discussion ) Ada ( page ' # ( ) .capan terima kasih/ pen%har%aan ( acknowledgement ) Ada ( page 1 ) -aftar +ustaka ( Reference ) Ada ( page 1) ) /esimpulan : *+r,a- %eg.ap/-ida. %eg.ap 0. TELAAH 1ALI2ITAS PENELITIAN 0uuan penelitian : to disseminate information about prevention intervention projects and to serve as a resource to be used by California local health departments and community- based organizations. Metode penelitian Item telaah 0emuan (sebutkan berikut halamann&a) -isain/rancan%an (design) S3s-e,a-i4 re5ie6 1 0in%katan dalam hierarchy of evidence 1 2ampel (sample) 7+8+r- s-&dies 68i48 evaluate the efects of behavioral prevention interventions for HIV in heterosexual frican mericans in the !nited "tates. # page $ % .kuran sampel (sample sie) 34 ournals &ere selected for revie&' ( )* studies &hose samples &ere composed of )++, frican mericans participants ( )- studies &hose samples had at least *+, frican merican participants. &ith no separate analyses for the frican merican 1 population ( )/ studies &hose samples &ere less than )++, frican merican. &ith separate analyses for the frican merican population. # 0age / % /riteria inklusi (eligibility criteria! 1or inclusion. study samples had to meet at least one of the follo&ing criteria' ( )++, of the sample &as frican merican. ( t least *+, of the sample &as frican merican. ( frican merican participants &ere examined separately if less than )++, of the sample. ( page " ) Metode penentuan sampel (sampling frame) +urposive Metode pen%umpulan data 2earchin% from the center of disease control (C-C) and prevention5s prevention research s&nthesis proect! ( pa%e 1 ) Cara pen%ukuran (measurement and or assessment) 2bserving studies that reported any type of outcome measure related to HIV transmission &ere included' 3no&ledge. attitudes. intentions. self-reported ris3 behavior. biological outcomes. and so forth. 4he 5uality of the studies &as assessed in several &ays. ta3ing into account the inclusion criteria and methods used in previous systematic revie&s. 4he researchers then assessed the follo&ing four criteria. &hich &ere those deemed most appropriate for the types of studies included in the revie&')6 ( 7andomization ( ttrition ( 0rotection against contamination ( 4raining8ma3eup of the facilitators of the intervention ( pa%e 3 ) Instrumen &an% diper%unakan (instrument) C-C5s documents Metode randomisasi (randomiation) " Intervensi (intervention) " Metode analisis / pen%olahan data (analysis method) 2corin% and comparin% Randomization 7andomization &as assessed according to the standards of the Cochrane Collaboration.)6 If the method of randomization $ &as clearly described #e.g.. the use of random number tables or coin 9ips%. the study &as given full credit for this category #: points%. If the study merely mentioned the &ord ;random< but did not give an ade5uate description. it received partial credit for this category #) point%. If the authors did not give any description or described using such allocation methods as a day of the &ee3 or dates of birth. the study did not get credit for this category. Attrition If attrition #the number of participants &ho dropped out bet&een baseline data collection and follo&-up% &as less than :+, of the subjects randomized. the study &as given full credit for this category #) point%. If more than :+, attrition occurred or if the information regarding attrition &as unclear. the study did not receive credit. Contamination If proper methods &ere utilized to protect against any contamination of the intervention #such as the possibility that participants in diferent groups could have signi=cant contact &ith each other. thereby adversely afecting the integrity of the intervention% the study received full credit for this category #) point%. If proper methods &ere not ta3en or if the methods ta3en &ere unclear. the study did not receive credit. If the C>I127?I C2>>@274I2?" I? HIV 07AVA?4I2? 7A"A7CH' BI""ACI?4I2? 072DAC4 7A"A7CH "!CC7E / study design did not &arrant a protection against contamination. this criterion &as not used. and the study could receive a maximum of / points. Training and Makeup of Facilitators 6 If the study included information regarding the training or ma3eup of the facilitators. credit &as given to the study for this category #) point%. If this description &as not included. credit &as not given. #4his issue is not applicable to all studies.% Scoring "tudies that received -FG)++, of possible points &ere deemed ;good< studies. 4hose that received F+G-F, of possible points scored ;fair.< nd studies that received less than F+, of possible points &ere rated as having signi=cant methodological limitations. /esesuaian antara disain dan tuuan penelitian : sesuai / tidak sesuai /esesuaian cara pen%ukuran dan instrument &an% diper%unakan : sesuai / tidak sesuai /esimpulan : valid / tidak valid (H'N7' ,8*-'2'*/'N /8-.' /*I08*I' -I '0'2) 3. TELAAH IMPORTANCE PENELITIAN
/omentar men%enai kesesuaian nilai ** den%an disain &an% diper%unakan 0idak dapat dievaluasi importancen&a karena nilai Confidence Interval tidak ada dalam urnal ini! 9 :. APPLICABILITY (KEMAMPUTERAPAN) +er%unakan item pertimban%an di ba#ah ini untuk menilai kemamputerapan paper dalam kasus anda +ertimban%an applicability : 3 , Item pertimban%an /eputusan burden of illness (pasien9 kota) sama/ tidak sama barriers to treatment (ekonomi9 %eo%rafi) sama/ tidak sama behaviours needed (perilaku kita dan pasien kita) untuk men%adopsi -:9 0: +erlu ban&ak perubahan perilaku/ tidak perlu ban&ak perubahan perilaku balance (pertimban%an untun% ru%i antara men%aplikasikan den%an cara &an% ada di paper dan cara &an% ada dalam kasus) .ntun% / ru%i ,a%aimana applicability penelitian ini terhadap kasus anda ; Applicable"tidak applicable 3