Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strunk's Reply To DOJ Response Opposing Permission For MOL and Summary Judgment DCD 08-cv-2234 - 120309
Strunk's Reply To DOJ Response Opposing Permission For MOL and Summary Judgment DCD 08-cv-2234 - 120309
Plaintiff / Relator
v.
Defendant / Respondent.
------------------------------------------------------x
§1746 as follows:
response of November 19, 2009 in anticipation of the Court’s order to allow entry of the Judicial
Notices as a courtesy to this Court as shown in Defendants’ Exhibit A “Judicial Notice and
Request for Permission to File a Memorandum for Declaratory Judgment and Order,” and
Exhibit B “Judicial Notice” as the optional Relator’s Replevin Demand of the Usurper, Barack
Hussein Obama et al. as of right with DCC Chapter 37 §16-3701(1); and especially since any
actual filing per se with District Rules is a related case to be assigned to Judge Leon, and
therefore for judicial economy should be combined with a formal Complaint and Affidavit under
DC Code Chapter 37 Section 3702, 3703 and undertaking with § 16-3704 to abide judgment of
this court at the time of filing a complaint in replevin, in which relator shall enter into an
That whether or not there is a quo warranto inquest per se Relator nevertheless demands
the return of personal property presently wrongly administered by the Usurper who is ineligible
to serve as the trustee, was properly fired on January 22, 2009 as to Relator’s power of attorney
over the trust and administration of the bond and private account wasting by misadministration
of Usurper et al.
. To say the least the Usurper’s eligibility as POTUS questions authority of the executive
office that rightly must be assumed by President Joseph Biden under Article II Section 1 Clause
6 and Twenty-fifth Amendment is not a model of clarity, and that the White House did respond
to unspecified correspondence from Relator as the USPS delivery of Certified mail with Return
Receipts show (attached) make as special plea informing that the Executive Office of the
President under the separation of powers doctrine do not generally involve itself in legal matters,
and the Usurper in esse is not represented by Counsel herein as shown on the Docket for 09-cv-
1
DC Code Chapter 37 §16-3701- In an action of Replevin brought to recover personal property to which
the plaintiff is entitled, that is alleged to have been wrongfully taken by or to be in the possession of and
wrongfully detained by the defendant, it is not necessary to demand possession of the property before
bringing the action; but the costs of the action may be awarded as the court orders.
1295 and in fact since all the cases are related herein such response by the Usurper functions as a
“demurrer” general denial with specificity otherwise missing in any form letter that only
addresses this legal action entitling Strunk to judgment regarding the Usurper’s eligibility to hold
the office of President and who has directly injured Relator, who directly challenges both the
office and actions as to the personal injury as a hybrid quo warranto action renders Relator the
actual interested party required in DC Code 35 Section 3603, and affords Private Attorney
General Relator authority as with 18 USC 1964(c) and or Title 31 Qui Tam Act and
whistleblower matters grant statutory status for the interests of the USA, in that the required due
process under the Qui Tam Act (2), 18 USC 1964(c), with DC Code Chapters 35 and 37 in part
and as with a Writ of Mandamus have been presented to the Executive as per statutory
requirements,
extended length.
2
See “Citizen Suits and Qui Tam Actions: Private Enforcement of Public Policy” by the
National Legal Center For the Public Interest at 1000 - 16th Street N.W. Suite 301 Washington
D.C. 20063 Tel: 202-296-1683 (1996) ISBN 0-937299-44-8
I
I
IPnrn your name
W Attachthiioaudtbthebrdcdthemaitpiece,
i SranthelCmtta
~ m e m S 1 . 2 a n d 3 . A L s o ~
~41~DelhreryIsdesLed a m
t W Print y a w name and address on Um meme "Add=-q
I
?mrrritmlCikrtff~pmJla I
1 . klwn-e .
!. D . b c M w l y ~ ~ f r a n R B m 1OYes?
If YES. enter delivery address bebw: No
-- 4. -mivay)mJaw O b ,
v)
Postage $
0
- m
''
0 Certified Fee
m.
iri TOM postage & FWS
Daniel E. Shape
1$ %.I5 1
11/10/~ vl
N -
:- -1
I
Jf~,,Firfi Deputy secietmy 0fStofe
ff ser Gary Faye Loeke in eJ*
g ----
[
,.--
sfi D ~ AUN
:T
IED STATES SECRETARY
State of New York merit of St'--*'-
One Commerce Plaza
------ or, OFTHEDEPARTN~E~OFCO~R~*
smE~-~q,
&IGN(S)
,
,
III care o t
AGENT(%
di $0.44 1 0337
1-1
Postage $
m Certified Fee
. (Endorsement
Return Receipt
Required)
Fee Postmark
Here !
- $2.30 Here ,
0- J - Obama
Barack Husse!in . i i h
0 . . D/B/A:BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, INC.
rn o r P 0 & ~
P- SUPERYISOR(S), HEIRS(S), AGENT@),
-----------
Ow shte, ASSIGN@) In care oE The White Houw
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N W
Was~o,DC20500
Complete items 1.2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. q r h f ? W HOUSE
l ~ ~ ~omcb
Print your name and address on the reverse ' ~ ~ S H I N ~D
O. N
C. , 2 0 5 M ~dd-
so that we can returnthe card to you.
rn Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece,
or on the front if space pmits.
Q. Isdelhreryaddma d b m t thm-~Item17 Yes
1. Article Addressed b If YES, enter delhrery addreas Mw: No
<
B W ~ OhmaH 1~ n 2
D m B m c K m s E mo B mm F
S- -r -m E R v i S O m FmR!qs),AGErn(sX
-
: ~ s ~ o r m 3 8 1Felxuary?OO4
1. ~omestic~etum~eceipt rvaGm.wisl~,4
LL
I
, . -I
i
l $2.24
Certified Fee $2.80 06
0
0 Return Recelpt,Fee Postmark
0 (Endorsement Required)
'0
$2.30 Hem
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
J]
a
m s t 1 $ ~1.95 1 0337
3
0.r1ifi.d Fee ( e.m 1 04
Postmark
Here
ReNXted O*ive~Y.Fee
(EndorsementRequired)
1 w . ~ 1
-PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestk Return Recdpt
. -
'
i
l
m
i
l
" 2
Postage $
. * i i ) j 3
$4.95 (
,'81' ,
0113
> "'
I
0 Return Receipt Fee
0 (EndorsementRequired)
item 4 if ~estricted&livery Is desired:
. Print your name and addre& on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
O R *R;m~.ph-:
Insured Mail C.O.D.
t
2. ArticleN~tmber 3
,
(re*-- 7009 2250 0003 h568 1217
PS Form 3811. ~ebruary2004 ~omestkReturn Receipt 1-1640
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
in re Strunk v. U.S. Department of State et al., 08-cv-2234 (RJL)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On December 3, 2009, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC
1746,
Caused the service of three (3) complete sets of the Attachments annexed to RELATOR’S REPLY
TO DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL RESPONSE OPPOSING THE JUDICIAL NOTICE AND
REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A MEMORANDUM FOR DECLARATORY
JUDGMENT AND ORDER, AS TO THE CROSS MOTION FOR A QUO WARRANTO
INQUEST OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA declared December 3, 2009 , and did place a
complete set in a sealed folder properly addressed with proper postage to be served by USPS mail
upon: