Maney Publishing and International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in Conservation.
http://www.jstor.org Maney Publishing Approaches for Conservators to the Identification of Plant Material used in Mori Artefacts Author(s): Debra Carr, Natasha Cruthers, Elizabeth Girvan and Susan Scheele Source: Studies in Conservation, Vol. 53, No. 4 (2008), pp. 252-263 Published by: on behalf of the Maney Publishing International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27867048 Accessed: 18-08-2014 08:49 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 252 Approaches for Conservators to the Identification of Plant Material used in Maori Artefacts Debra Carr, Natasha Cruthers, Elizabeth Girvan and Susan Scheele The aim of this study is to provide a suite of tools to assist with the preliminary identification of historical textile plant material originating from New Zealand. The plants investigated are indigenous to New Zealand and were/are used by Maori for the manufacture of baskets, mats, nets, ropes, snares and various garments. Surface morphology of leaves, fibre bundle shape and repeating pattern observable in transverse sections of leaves, fibre dimensions and the presence of crystals were evaluated. Some results from this research have been used to establish a free-to-use on-line database that may assist in identifying plant material used in artefacts manufactured by Maori, but which should not be regarded as a substitute for a confirmed identification by a plant scientist. INTRODUCTION It is widely recognized that the identification of material(s) used in artefacts is critical before the selection of appropriate conservation treatments (see for example [1?3]). Cultural institutions, both in New Zealand and overseas, hold collections of woven and plaited artefacts manufactured by Maori, including fragments from archaeological excavations. The plant material used in such objects is not always known nor easily determined by employees in these cultural institutions. Plant material used in artefacts from New Zealand is often recorded as unknown or tentatively recorded as either Phormium tenax (harakeke) or Cordyline australis (t? kouka). Processing methods, surface dirt, historical conservation treatments, ageing processes, storage issues and, particularly, a lack of readily available reference information all contribute to the difficulty of making positive identifications of plant species used. Before European contact, Maori were reliant on local plant resources for their survival. As well as the Received October 2007 essentials of food, medicine and shelter, the leaves, stems and occasionally bark of many species were used to make clothing, containers (in the absence of pottery), mats and cordage (see for example [4-13]). The most widely used and important species in Maori subsistence economy was Phormium tenax (harakeke, New Zealand flax). Leaf strips (whenu) were used to make baskets (kete) and other containers, mats for sleeping and sitting on, fishing nets and snares, serviceable garments, sandals (paraerae) and, in more recent times, the swinging skirt called a piupiu.The fibre (muka or whxtau) extracted from the leaves was used for the manufacture of cloaks and other fine garments and cordage. Phormium cookianum (wharariki) is not as strong and fibrous as P. tenax, but was employed in the manufacture of items that could be used and discarded, or where lightweight qualities were desired. The tough fibrous leaves of Cordyline australis (t? k?uka, cabbage tree) were valued when hard-wearing properties were required, such as for sandals, snares, baskets for collecting shellfish, and to create an outer layer of thatching on rain capes (i.e. short strips of plant material inserted into the outer surface of the main body of the cape in an overlapping manner). Cordyline is more STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 253 resistant to rotting in seawater than Phormium, so fibre retted from Cordyline was used for the manufacture of anchor ropes. Cordyline indivisa, (t?t, mountain cabbage tree) was particularly important in mountainous regions where harakeke did not grow, and the retted leaf fibre was used in making weatherproof capes. Strips of Freycinetia banksii (kiekie) leaves were another highly regarded resource for weaving fine mats and baskets and in making tukutuku (decorative panels). The retted fibre was also used in making capes. The sedge Eleocharis sphacelata (kutd) was favoured when softness was desired for weaving baskets, widows' mourning caps, hats and mats. The spongy stems of another sedge, Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (k?p?ng?wh?, and also called kutd), closely related to the worldwide genus Scirpus, were used to plait sleeping mats and whitebait nets. The tough, golden leaves of Desmoschoenus spir?lis ipTngao), a sedge found on sand dunes, were used to weave baskets, belts and poho-taupa (chest protectors used in fighting), and in decorative tukutuku panels. Strips of the lacy inner bark of Hoheria spp. (houhere, lacebark) were used when making decorative baskets, for ornamentation such as braiding on hats, while the tough outer bark was plaited into strong ropes. Hierochloe redolens, (k?retu, holy grass) is a sweet-scented grass used to manufacture women's belts, headbands and as a scented necklace. The dried leaves of Dracophyllum spp. (neinei, inanga) were tied into cloaks as ornamental tags. The silvery tomentum of the leaves of large mountain daisies (Celmisia spp.) was removed and used in making cloaks (often as ornamental tags), rain cloaks and stuffed into leggings to protect travellers' legs from thorny plants. Among other less common plants used on cloaks for decoration or thatching are tussock grasses, such as Poa spp. The current research focuses on the development of a web-based atlas containing reference information from dried and semi-processed contemporary specimens of indigenous New Zealand plant material (e.g., fibre and leaves) that may assist employees in cultural institu tions with the identification of plant material. It is envisaged that the atlas will grow to include similar information regarding historical specimens, further assisting identification of plant material used in objects. The atlas aims to provide images that the non-specialist can use to assist in identification and thus add to the suite of observed features available. It seeks to provide a preliminary step towards species identification, although consultation with specialists may be required for a positive identification. It is useful to define some terms that are used by object and textile conservators, and by botanists and plant anatomists. Fibre aggregate, a term used by textile conservators/scientists, refers to the macroscopic product of leaf or stem processing [14]. Fibre aggregates are popularly referred to as 'the fibre' in publications, but may contain many components, i.e. ultimate fibres and often vascular bundles which transport water and solutes [15, 16]. Ultimate fibre is a textile/fibre science term used to describe the individual fibres or single sclerenchyma cells (plant science term) found in fibre aggregates [14,16]. In fibre aggregates, the ultimate fibres are twisted together or arranged in an overlapping manner, and are adhered in a non-cellulosic matrix. Bundles of fibres may be visible in transverse sections of leaves [15]. Diagnostic tools that can contribute to the identifi cation of plant material and would be relatively accessible when specialized advice is not available include morphological features such as plant leaf surfaces, transverse sections of leaves and ultimate fibre dimensions. In textile science and conservation, microscopy is used primarily to distinguish among different fibres [1?3, 14?18]. The shape and size of the fibre bundles in transverse sections of leaves and of the individual ultimate fibres can be tools for identification purposes [14-18]. However, minimal information has been reported previously for plants from New Zealand. Exceptions include Goulding, who provided criteria and a key (but no microscopy images) for identifying 13 plants used in New Zealand artefacts, including Cordyline spp., Dracophyllum spp., Phormium spp., Hierochloe redolens, Freycinetia banksii, Eleocharis sphacelata and Desmoschoenus spir?lis [17]. A number of light microscopy images of Phormium have been published, the ultimate fibres are reportedly convex polygonal, with a round lumen and may be pitted [14, 16, 18]. A study of the transverse sections of leaves from different cultivars of Phormium has suggested differences in the pattern of'molar tooth shaped' and 'keyhole shaped' fibre bundles that may enable different cultivars to be distinguished [18]. Unlike most plants, there is an equal number of stornata on both sides of the Cordyline leaf and this may assist is distinguishing Cordyline from other species. There is much debate in the plant science literature about whether the presence of crystals in plant material can be a useful tool for their identification [16, 19?22]. However, crystals are widely used in textile science and textile conservation to assist in the identification of plant material [2, 14-16]. At least five crystal morphologies are identified in the literature, but these are commonly grouped into these main categories: raphides (needle-like crystals); STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 254 D. CARR, . CRUTHERS, E. GIRVAN AND S. SCHEELE sand-like, styloids and prismatic crystals; and druses (multiple crystals that appear flower-like) [16, 19-22]. Crystals are notoriously difficult to use as a diagnostic feature as the take-up of calcium or silica by the plant and deposition in the cells is erratic and related to soil and geology, sometimes on a very localized basis. In this study the presence of crystals was noted, but care should be taken not to rely too heavily on their presence as a reliable diagnostic criterion. The aim of this study was to provide selected refer ence data - images of leaf surfaces, transverse sections (to allow examination of fibre bundle shape and repeat pattern), ultimate fibre length and width, and presence of crystals ? that might assist with identifying such plant material. METHODS Materials Plant specimens for study were selected according to their importance in early Maori material culture, as reflected in the literature [4-13]. The selection was approved by Maori weavers, conservators and other museum professionals, and circulated to relevant academic departments within the University of Otago for their comment. All plant specimens in this study were identified, collected and supplied by an ethnobotanist of long-standing experience and whose primary research area is weaving plants used by Maori (S. Scheele). On arrival at the University of Otago each plant specimen was given a unique code and documented; the locality at which it was collected was recorded, the specimen was photographed and notes made regarding its appearance. The botanical, Maori and common names of the species that were chosen are listed in Table 1 along with their common uses, while other pertinent information regarding usage is summarized above. Plant material was generally processed in some way before the manufacture of objects, e.g., extraction of fibre aggregates, softening of strips of leaves, drying, beating, boiling, bleaching and sometimes dyeing. It should be noted that such processing may have degraded the diagnostic features discussed in the current work. Plant material transverse sections and fibre dimensions Pieces of fresh material (~5 x 10 mm) were cut from the centre of leaves (right side), stems or bark as appropriate, fixed with Tellyesniczky s formula (100 mL 70% alcohol/ 5 mL glacial acetic acid/5 mL 100% formalin) for 24 Table 1 Botanical, Maori and common names of the plants studied, with details of the parts used and their common uses Botanical name Maori name Common name Part used Common uses Celmisia semicordata Cordyline australis Cordyline indivisa Desmoschoenus spir?lis Dracophyllum spp. Eleocharis sphacelata Freycinetia banksii Hierochloe redolens Hoheria populnea Phormium tenax Phormium cookianum Poa cita Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani tikumu ti k?uka toi pingao neinei, inanga kuta kiekie harakeke wharariki wJ k?pung?wh? mountain daisy cabbage tree mountain cabbage tree golden sand sedge bamboo spike sedge kiekie k?retu holy grass houhere lacebark leaf, tomentum leaf, fibre leaf, fibre leaf leaf stem leaf, fibre leaf outer and inner bark New Zealand flax, swamp flax leaf, fibre mountain flax, coastal flax leaf silver tussock leaf lake clubrush stem rain-protective tags on cloaks, as stuffing in leggings baskets, nets, snares, anchor ropes, rough garments, sandals rain capes (fibre), sandals, rough garments, baskets, cordage baskets, chest-protectors, belts, decorative house panels decorative tags on cloaks soft hats, baskets, mats baskets, mats, decorative house panels, rain cape (fibre) belts, necklace, headbands inner bark - kete, hats, decorative braids outer bark - cordage, piupiu, garments cloaks, baskets, cordage, mats, sandals, piupiu baskets, mats, tags on cloaks stuffing in leggings, top layer on cloaks mats, whitebait nets STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 255 hours and then stored in 70% alcohol. The methods used to prepare plant material transverse sections, macerate fibre bundles into ultimate fibres, and measure the dimensions of the ultimate fibres have been described previously [23]. Means, standard deviations (s.d.) and coefficients of variation (CV) for ultimate fibre 'width' and length measurements (for an average often samples: = 10) were calculated. Images of plant material surfaces Pieces of plant material were placed in buffered acid-free paper, sandwiched between buffered museum board and an outer metal frame and were oven dried (50?C, 72 hours). Dried, rather than fresh, material was examined because plant material specimens removed from artefacts are in a desiccated state. Small pieces (~5 x 10 mm) of this dried material were mounted on 25 mm diameter aluminium stubs with carbon tape so that the adaxial and abaxial surfaces could be examined. The specimens were coated with approximately 5 nm of gold/palladium or carbon and viewed in a Jeol 6700F field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (3-5 kV, 7?8 mm working distance). Chemical composition of crystals The transverse sections previously prepared (see above) were examined using polarized light to identify which specimens contained crystals. Crystals were observed in specimens of Cordyline spp., Hoheria, Dracophyllum, and two selections of Phormium (provenance Karikari Beach and the named cultivar 'Waihirere' ? both growing at Lincoln, South Island, New Zealand). Dried specimens for each of these were split and mounted on an aluminium stub using carbon tape. A Jeol 2300F energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector (10 kV, working distance 15 mm) was used to measure the energy of the X-rays emitted when an electron beam collided with the surface of the specimen, hence the elemental composition of the crystals could be investigated. Point and area analyses were used, dead time was kept below 25% and spectra were collected for 60 seconds. The specimens were then coated with 5 nm of gold/ palladium using an Emitech K575X high-resolution coater and crystals imaged using a Jeol 6700F FESEM (3 kV, 10 A). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION General observations Phormium tenax (harakeke) and P. cookianum (wharariki): A range of provenances and cultivated varieties (cultivars) of Phormium were examined (n = 28). Fibre bundles were either keyhole or molar-tooth shaped, and repeating patterns for these shapes were commonly observed (Figure la). Fibre bundles were larger in the upper part of the leaf. Generally, the fibre bundles in cookianum were smaller than those in harakeke. Sclerenchyma fibres had convex polygonal shapes with a clear elliptical or circular lumen, and were sometimes pitted. Hoheria populnea (houhere): The inner bark had a characteristic lace-like appearance. Fibre bundles were quadrilateral or elliptical in shape (~30-50 x 150-200 ), typically containing 30?50 convex polygonal fibres (occasionally pitted) with small circular or elliptical lumen (Figure lb). Hierochloe redolens (k?retu): The transverse section had a lace-like appearance (Figure lc).The elliptical or convex polygonal fibres had large lumens, thin walls and some were pitted. Freycinetia banksii (kiekie): The fibre bundles in the upper part of the leaf were irregular in shape (5?40 fibres), while in the lower part they were round (10?20 fibres) (Figure Id) [19]. Small (lighter stained) fibre bundles were observed close to the upper and lower epithelium with a cap over the top of the vascular bundle. The convex polygonal fibres were large with large lumens and comparatively sharp edges. Dracophyllum traversii {mountain neinei) and D. elegantissimum (neinei): Fibre bundles were not observed in either Dracophyllum species, rather the fibres were found throughout the structure (Figures le and If). The convex polygonal fibres had large lumens, and were smaller in D. eleganitissimum (which has the longer, narrower leaves) than in D. traversii. Desmoschoenus spir?lis (ptngao): Triangular/half-oval shaped fibre bundles (~50 x 50-100 ) were observed, while larger elliptical/irregularly shaped fibre bundles were observed in the centre of the leaf (Figure lg).The convex polygonal fibres had relatively thick cell walls with small lumens. Cordyline australis (t? k?uka): More fibre was observed in the upper portion of the leaf than the lower portion (Figure lh).The fibre bundles (100 x 300 ) repeated in a pattern of: molar tooth; small truncated oval or molar tooth; truncated hourglass or long molar STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 256 D. CARR, . CRUTHERS, E. GIRVAN AND S. SCHEELE (f) Figure 1 Transverse sections (light microscopy, scale bar = 50 m): (a) Phormium tenax Opiki'; (b) Hoheria populnea; (c) Hierochloe redplens; (d) Freycinetia banksii; (e) Dracophyllum traversii; (f) Dracophyllum elegantissimum; (g) Desmoschoenus spir?lis; (h) Cordyline australis; (i) Cordyline indivisa; Celmisia semicordata STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 257 Figure 1 Continued. tooth; small truncated oval or molar tooth; and molar tooth.The rounded thick walled convex polygonal fibres in C. australis had large elliptical lumens and pits. Thick distinct layers of wax were observed on the upper and lower cuticles. Cordyline indivisa (??f):The fibre bundles (~ 300 x 350 ) were molar-tooth shaped, the repeat pattern was large bundle, very small, small, very small, then large (Figure li). Fibres were convex polygonal with large lumen. Celmisia semicordata (tikumu): The fibrous surface appeared as flattened ribbons. In transverse section, a thick upper epidermis and distinct vascular tissue capped by small fibre bundles were noted (Figure lj). Ultimate fibre dimensions Ultimate fibre dimensions were obtained for most of the plants in the study (Table 2). Mean transverse widths of ultimate fibres from P. tenax varied from 11 (Campbell Island) to 15 ('Taeore' cultivar) and mean lengths varied from 1.79 mm (Ten Mile Creek) to 4.27 mm (Auckland Island) (Table 2). The cookianum examined tended to have larger transverse widths compared to P. tenax and the ultimate fibre lengths tended to be longer (Limestone Stream, width 13 , length 3.95 mm; Punakaiki, width 14 , length 3.86 mm;Wharariki '#62', width 14 , length 3.05 mm; Okiwi Bay, width 15 , length not collected) STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 258 D. CARR, . CRUTHERS, E. GIRVAN AND S. SCHEELE (Table 2). Cultivars from the Rene Orchiston weaving collection were represented throughout the range of ultimate fibre transverse widths and lengths (Table 2) [12]. The ultimate fibre widths and lengths of cultivars prized for the length, strength and ease of extraction of fibre ('Taumataua'/Tapamangu'and'Taeore') also varied across the range measured. The range of values obtained for P. tenax ultimate fibre dimensions is similar to those previously reported [18]. Fibres from Cordyline spp. were similar in width to P. tenax fibres, but were shorter, and this may assist in distinguishing between the use of these two plants. Ultimate fibres from C. austr?te were 13 wide and 1.39 mm long (Table 2). C. indivisa ultimate fibres were 15 wide and 1.45 mm long (Table 2).That C. indivisa has coarser fibres than C. austr?te has been previously noted, although no dimensions were given [17, 24]. For other plants, mean ultimate fibre dimensions ranged in width from 8 (Dracophyllum elegantissimum) to 23 (Hierocliloe redolens) and in length from 0.68 mm (Freycinetia banksii) to 1.92 mm (Desmoschoenus spirate) (Table 2). Crystals Calcium Oxalate raphide crystals were observed in three Cordyline species: C. austr?te, C. banksii and C. indivisa (Figures 2a?c). Raphides have been previously reported in Cordyline (species not stated) [20,25] and in specimens of root from C. austr?te [26]. Druse crystals were observed in Hoheria (Figures 3a and 3b) and styloid crystals were observed in both Dracophyllum species studied (Figures 4a and 4b). The presence of these crystals in Hoheria and Dracophyllum does not appear to have been previously reported. Calcium was detected using EDX in two selections of Phormium (Karikari beach, 'Waihirere'), but crystals were not observed in the specimens examined, although they were detected when transverse sections were examined with polarized light. Styloids have been reported as being present in Phormium, although no further details of the plant(s) examined were given [20, 27]. Parkin reported raphides in Phormum tenax var. atropurp?rea [28], a bronze variety more commonly known as 'Monrovia Red' [29]. Raphides have also been reported in the roots o? Phormium cookianum [26]. Database Reference data obtained during the research have been incorporated into a free-to-use on-line database aimed at assisting workers in cultural institutions to OTAGO SEI 3.0kV X4,000 l^m WD 7.6mm (c) Figure 2 Raphide crystals in Cordyline spp. (FESEM):%(a) Cordyline australis; (b) Cordyline banksii; (c) Cordyline indivisa. STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 259 Table 2 Dimensions of ultimate fibre: an average of ten (n = 10) unless otherwise stated Specimen Width mean s.d. (pm) (Mm) Length Coefficient of Variation (%) mean (mm) s.d. (mm) Coefficient of Variation (%) Phormium tenax^ cultivars/provenance: H?hiroa2 Ngutunui2 Opiki2 Paoa2 Paretaniwha2 Potaka2 Taeore, Taiore2 Taumataua2 Tapamangu2 Tupurupuru2 Waihirere2 Wharanui2 Whareongaonga2 Auckland Island Campbell Island Chatham Islands Karikari Beach Norfolk Island Port Hills Raoul Island Taramea Bay Ten Mile Creek Three Kings Island P. cookianum' cultivars/provenance: Limestone Stream Okiwi Bay Punakaiki Wharariki #622 Cordyline australis C. indivisa Desmoschoenus spir?lis fibre surrounding vascular bundle close to epithelium Dracophyllum elegantissimum D. traversa Freycinetia banksii fibre under vascular bundle fibres in other locations Hierochloe redolens Hoheria populnea Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani 11 12 15 12 15 14 15 12 15 12 12 13 14 12 11 13 12 12 12 15 12 13 15 13 15 14 14 13 15 12 9 8 16 13 18 23 16 nc 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 7 4 nc 19.0 16.3 13.0 14.9 12.1 16.2 14.2 8.3 16.7 9.5 10.8 12.8 8.0 18.2 13.7 14.4 17.6 12.5 14.8 11.2 10.8 12.7 14.4 10.5 12.5 17.1 12.6 14.2 14.8 13.7 21.9 20.5 13.4 21.2 16.1 33.1 24.7 nc 3.68 (n = 2) nc 3.66 2.52 (n = 5) nc 3.86 nc 3.09 (n = 4) nc nc 2.25 nc 2.67 (n = 5) 4.27 2.77 (n = 5) nc nc nc 4.25 (n = 8) 3.14 nc 1.79 3.14 (n = 4) 3.95 (n = 6) nc 3.86 3.05 1.39 1.45 1.92 nc nc 0.75 0.82 (n = 8) 0.68 nc nc 0.96 1.63 0.77 (n = 5) 0.19 nc 0.62 0.27 nc 0.61 nc 0.59 nc nc 0.33 nc 0.97 0.73 1.66 nc nc nc 0.36 0.37 nc 0.30 0.35 0.51 nc 0.70 0.49 0.52 0.31 0.36 nc nc 0.15 0.13 0.16 nc nc 0.20 0.27 0.18 5.2 nc 16.9 10.9 nc 15.9 nc 17.3 nc nc 14.7 nc 36.3 17.1 59.9 nc nc nc 8.5 11.8 nc 16.8 11.2 12.8 nc 18.13 16.2 37.5 21.5 18.8 nc nc 20.0 16.3 23.5 nc nc 20.3 16.6 23.1 ' Growing at Lincoln, South Island, New Zealand;2 from the Rene Orchiston weaving collection; nc = data not collected STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 260 D. CARR, N. CRUTHERS, E. GIRVAN AND S. SCHEELE (b) Figure 3 Druses crystals in Hoheria populnea (FESEM): (a) magnification 750; (b) magnification 2500. take steps towards the identification of plant material in artefacts. Consultation with New Zealand conservators suggested the use of minimal text in the database and the inclusion of images of leaf surfaces; transverse sections; photographs of the plants (to give an idea of the general appearance rather than as an identification tool); Maori, common and botanical names; some traditional uses; and useful links. The microscopy images provided in the database are at magnifications well within the range of simple optical microscopes commonly available in conservation laboratories. The leaf surface images (b) Figure 4 Styloid crystals in Dracophyllum spp. (FESEM): (a) D. elegantissimum; (b) D. traversii. were obtained using scanning electron microscopy to ensure good depth of field, but the magnifications used (X100?200) were chosen with optical microscopes in mind. The database He mrangi whakaaturanga o ng? taonga r?kau (data /identification /exhibition list of treasured plants) is available at www.otago.ac.nz/textiles/plantfibres/ index.html (accessed 10 November 2008). The authors are in the process of adding images of historical specimens to the database and encourage submission of images for inclusion. The images used in the database are not reproduced in this article, but higher STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 261 magnification images have been provided to illustrate the discussion. CONCLUSIONS A database of observed features has been developed and made accessible to assist workers in cultural institutions to characterize plant material that has been used in objects originating from New Zealand. These include transverse sections, fibre bundle shape and repeat pattern, ultimate fibre dimensions and the observation of crystals for contemporary plant material. Distinct differences have been identified between the two most commonly used, and commonly confused, plants, i.e. Phormium tenax and Cordyline australis. Of particular use are: the comparison of the transverse sections of Phormium and Cordyline; the observation of raphide crystals in C australis; the ultimate fibres in tenax and C. australis are similar in width, but those from C. australis are shorter; and the transverse sections of Freycinetia banksii {kiekie) and Desmoschoenus spir?lis (p?ngao); because the leaves from some P. tenax that have been processed into narrow strips and woven into fine articles dry to shades of white and yellow similar to those shown by kiekie and pxngao. However, it must be emphasized that the database contains information collected on semi-processed, dried contemporary material. It is recognized that for historic specimens some of the features described in this paper may be degraded or the processing may be at such a level that the diagnostic features described are no longer visible. Further work is required to address these issues. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Maori ownership, traditional knowledge and the status under Article II of The Treaty of Waitangi of the plants investigated in this work are acknowledged and recognized by the authors. Heike Winkelbauer, an objects conservator, first suggested the development of an atlas of plant material from New Zealand. New Zealand Lottery Grants (Lottery Environment and Heritage Committee) funded this work.The authors acknowledge the assistance of K. Columb (Human Nutrition), A. McNaughton (Otago Centre for Confocal Microscopy) and D. Potter (Histology), and comments made by C. Smith (Clothing and Textile Sciences), Professor R.M. Laing (Clothing and Textile Sciences) and Dr J. Lord (Department of Botany), all of the University of Otago. We also acknowledge comments made by the referees. Rua McCallum (Ng?i Tahu wh?nui) provided guidance throughout the project ? kia ora, Rua. REFERENCES 1 Goodway, M., 'Fiber identification in practice', Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 26 (1987) 27-44. 2 Florian, M.-L.E., Kronkright, D.P., and Norton, R.E., The Conservation of Artifacts made from Plant Materials, The Getty Conservation Institute, Marina del Rey (1992). 3 Bal?zsy, A., and Eastop, D., Chemical Principles of Textile Con servation, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1999). 4 Colenso, W., On the geographic and economic botany of the North Island of New Zealand', Transactions of the New Zealand Institute 1 (1869) 1-58. 5 Best, E., 'The art of the whare pora: Notes on the clothing of the ancient Maori, their knowledge of the preparing, dyeing, and weaving various fibres, together with some account of dress and ornaments and ancient ceremonies and superstitions of the whare pora', Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 31 (1898) 625-658. 6 BeattieJ.H., Traditional Lifeways of the Southern Maori:The Otago University Museum Ethnological Project, 1920, Otago University Press/Otago Museum, Dunedin, New Zealand (1994). 7 Buck, R, (Te Rangi Hiroa), 'The Maori craft of netting', Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 56 (1926) 597-646. 8 Best, E., Forest lore of the Maori, Polynesian Society in collabora tion with Dominion Museum, Wellington, New Zealand 14 (1942). 9 Beattie, J.H., Our Southernmost Maoris, Otago Daily Times and Witness Newspapers Co. Ltd., Dunedin, New Zealand (1954). 10 Mead, S.M., Traditional Maori Clothing: A Study of Technological and Functional Change, Reed, Wellington, New Zealand (1969). 11 Pendergrast, M., TeAho Tapu:The Sacred Thread, Reed Methuen, Auckland, New Zealand (1987). 12 Scheele, S., and Walls, G., HarakekeiThe Rene Orchiston Collection, Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand (1994). 13 Puketapu-Hetet, E., Maori Weaving, Longman, Auckland, New Zealand (1999). 14 Catling, D., and Grayson, }., Identification of Long Vegetable Fibres, Chapman and Hall, London (1982). 15 Esau, K., Plant Anatomy, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1965). 16 Luniak, B., The Identification of Plant Fibres, Pitman and Sons, London (1953). 17 Goulding, J.H., 'Identification of archaeological and ethnological specimens of fibre-plant material used by the Maori', Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 8 (1971) 57-101. STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 262 D. CARR, . CRUTHERS, E. GIRVAN AND S. SCHEELE 18 Cruthers, N.M., Carr, DJ., Laing, R.M., and Niven, B.E., 'Structural differences among fibers from six cultivars of harakeke (Phormium tenax, New Zealand flax)', Textile Research Journal 76 (2006) 601-606. 19 Franceschi,V.R., and Horner, H.T.,'Calcium Oxalate crystals in plants', The Botanical Review 46 (1980) 361-427. 20 Prychid, C.J., and Rudall, P.J., 'Calcium Oxalate crystals in monocotyledons: A review of their structure and systematics', Annals of Botany 84 (1999) 725-739. 21 Nakata, P.A., 'Calcium Oxalate crystal morphology', Trends in Plant Science 1 (2002) 324. 22 Amato, I., 'The secret life of plant crystals', Chemical & Engineering News 84 (2006) 26-27'. 23 Cruthers, N.M., Carr, DJ., Niven, B.E., Girvan, E., and Laing, R.M., 'Methods for characterizing plant fibers', Microscopy Research and Technique 67 (2005) 260-264. 24 Simpson, P., Dancing Leaves: The Story of New Zealand's Cabbage Tree, TT K?uka, Canterbury University Press, Christchurch (2000). 25 Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.E, and Humphries, C.J., Monocotyledons Systematics and Evolution, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London (1995). 26 Kauff, E, Rudall, PJ., and ConranJ.G., 'Systematic root anatomy of Asparagales and other monocotyledons', Plant Systematics and Evolution 223 (2000) 139-154. 27 Dahlgren, R.M.T., and Clifford, H.T., The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study, Academic Press, London (1982). 28 Parkin, J.,'On some points in the histology of monocotyledons', Annals of Botany XII (1898) 147-155. 29 Heenan, P.B., Checklist of Phormium Cultivars, Royal New Zealand Institute of Horticulture, Lincoln (1991). AUTHORS Debra Carr is a materials engineer whose research interests include the structure, properties and use of fibres. She is an Affiliate Member of the New Zealand Conservators of Cultural Materials (NZCCM). Address: Clothing and Textile Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. Email: d.carr@otago.ac.nz Natasha Cruthers is a PhD student whose research interests include properties of natural fibres. Address: as Carr. Email: natasha.cruthers@otago.ac.nz Elizabeth Girvan is a scanning electron microscopist who works with staff from a wide range of departments at the University of Otago, New Zealand. Address: Otago Centre for Electron Microscopy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Email: liz.girvan@otago.ac.nz Sue Scheele is an ethnobotanist, with particular research interests in weaving plants used by Maori. Address: Tandeare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. Email: ScheeleS@landcareresearch. co. nz R?sum? ? Le but de cette ?tude est de fournir une s?rie d'outils pouvant aider ? identifier de fa?on pr?liminaire les mat?riaux textiles v?g?taux originaires de la Nouvelle-Z?lande. Les v?g?taux ?tudi?s sont indig?nes de Nouvelle-Z?lande et ?taient (ou sont) utilis?s par les Maoris pour la fabrication de paniers, nattes, filets, cordages, pi?ges, et v?tements vari?s. On a ?tudi? la morphologie de la surface des feuilles, la forme des faisceaux de fibres et les motifs r?p?titifs observables dans les sections transversales des feuilles, la dimension des fibres et la pr?sence de cristaux. Certains r?sultats de cette recherche ont ?t? utilis?s pour ?tablir une base de donn?es libre d'acc?s qui peut aider ? identifier les mat?riaux v?g?taux utilis?s dans Vartisanat maori, mais qui ne doit pas ?tre consid?r?e comme un substitut pour une identification fait par un scientifique sp?cialiste des plantes. Zusammenfassung ? Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, mit einer Reihe von hilfreichen Werkzeugen bei der Identifizierung von historischem textilem Pflanzenmaterial aus Neuseeland zu assistieren. Die untersuchten indigenen Pflanzen Neuseelands wurden/werden von den M?ori f?r die Herstellung von K?rben, Matten, Netzen, Seilen, Stricken und verschiedenen Kleidungsst?cken verwendet. Die Oberfl?chenmorphologie der Bl?tter, die Form der Faserb?ndel und sich wiederholende Muster im Querschnitt von Bl?ttern, Faserdimensionen sowie die Anwesenheit kristalliner Strukturen wurde zur Analyse genutzt. Einige Ergebnisse der Forschung wurden zur Etablierung einer freien Onlinedatenbank genutzt, die dazu beitragen kann, das Pflanzenmaterial von durch die M?ori hergestellten Objekten zu bestimmen, was allerdings nicht als Ersatz f?r eine sichere Bestimmung durch einen Botaniker gelten kann. Resumen ? La intenci?n de este estudio es aportar una gama de herramientas v?lidas para ayudar en la identificaci?n preliminar de materiales hist?ricos textiles de naturaleza vegetal originarios de Nueva Zelanda. Las plantas investigadas son ind?genas de Nueva Zelanda fueron, o son, usadas por los Ma?ori para la manufactura de cestos, esteras, redes, cuerdas, trampas y diversas vestimentas. Se evaluaron la morfolog?a superficial de las hojas, la morfolog?a de los haces de fibras, la repetici?n de STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions APPROACHES FOR CONSERVATORS TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT MATERIAL USED IN MAORI ARTEFACTS 263 estructuras en cortes transversales de hojas, las dimensiones de las fibras la presencia de cristales. Algunos resultados de esta investigaci?n han sido utilizados para establecer bases de datos en l?nea de libre acceso que puedan ayudar a identificar materiales de origen vegetal empleados en la manufactura de objetos de los Ma?or?, aunque no deber?an ser utilizados para sustituir las identificaciones precisas del cient?fico de materiales vegetales. STUDIES IN CONSERVATION 53 (2008) PAGES 252-263 This content downloaded from 84.205.227.38 on Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:49:11 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions