Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAQUES - Anaerobic Effluent Treatment Pulp & Paper
PAQUES - Anaerobic Effluent Treatment Pulp & Paper
PAQUES - Anaerobic Effluent Treatment Pulp & Paper
IC reactor
25
26
Advantages BIOPAQ IC reactor
Proven technology, > 875 BIOPAQ references
Closed system, corrosion free materials
Minimal foot-print (space saving and odor emission
surface limited)
Completely mixed reactor compartment due to Internal
Circulation principle
Optimal sludge retention due to two-staged separation
Maximal recovery of biological alkalinity, reduced
chemical costs
Robust & more stable due to
- two-staged concept
- automatic internal dilution (IC)
27
Feasibility of anaerobic effluent
treatment
MILL PROCESS FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC
TREATMENT
Mechanical Pulping
Debarking
RMP, Ground wood
TMP, BTMP (Peroxide)
CTMP, BCTMP (Peroxide)
APMP (Peroxide)
-
+
++
+/++
++
Semi Chemical Pulping
NSSC
Soda pulping
+
+
Chemical Pulping
Sulfite pulp condensate
Sulfite bleaching: E,O,P
Sulfite bleaching: C,H,D
++
+
-
Kraft pulp condensate
Kraft bleaching: E,O,P
Kraft bleaching: C,H,D
++
+
-
Dissolving pulp condensate
Bleaching: E,O,P
Bleaching: C,H,D
+
+
-
Secondary Fibres
Wastepaper, DIP ++
Non-wood (soda) Pulping
Straw, Bagasse, Cotton Linters
+
28
Raw material and COD removal
Raw material COD efficiency %
OCC 75 85
MWP 65 -
75
MOW 60 - 70
ONP 50 - 55
Mech. pulp / spruce 50 - 55
Mech. pulp / aspen 65 - 75
Condensates 75 - 95
29
General flow diagram
Sludge
dewatering
N,P
Effluent
Primary clarifier
Aeration tanks
Sec. clarifier
sieve
Influent
Return sludge
Biogas
Gasholder Flare
IC reactor Conditioning
tank
30
Zero discharge concept at paper mill
Conditioning tank
IC Reactor
Aereation
Water storage tank
Secondary clarifier
Aereation basins
31
SCA Newhythe - UK
IC diameter 9.5 m
Height 20 m
Volume 1,400 m3
Flow 6,000 m3/d
COD 5,000 mg/l
COD 30 tpd
32
COD-load (kg/d)
IC Reactor COD load
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
1
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
2
5
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
8
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
2
2
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
6
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
2
0
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
3
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
7
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
9
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
2
3
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
7
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
2
1
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
4
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
8
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
6
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
3
0
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
k
g
C
O
D
/
d
33
Final effluent COD (mg/l)
Final Effluent COD
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
1
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
1
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
2
5
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
8
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
2
2
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
6
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
2
0
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
3
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
7
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
9
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
2
3
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
7
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
2
1
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
4
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
8
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
6
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
3
0
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
C
O
D
(
m
g
/
l
)
34
COD removal (%)
IC Reactor COD removal efficiency (%)
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
100,0
1
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
1
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
2
5
-
3
-
2
0
0
4
8
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
2
2
-
4
-
2
0
0
4
6
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
2
0
-
5
-
2
0
0
4
3
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
7
-
6
-
2
0
0
4
1
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
5
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
2
9
-
7
-
2
0
0
4
1
2
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
2
6
-
8
-
2
0
0
4
9
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
2
3
-
9
-
2
0
0
4
7
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
2
1
-
1
0
-
2
0
0
4
4
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
1
8
-
1
1
-
2
0
0
4
2
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
1
6
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
3
0
-
1
2
-
2
0
0
4
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
(
%
)
35
SAICA 3, Spain
Diameter 9.5 m Height 24 m Volume 1,680 m3
Flow 8,000 m3/d COD 5,800 mg/l COD 47 tpd
36
SAICA 3: Biogas production and VLR
15.000
15.500
16.000
16.500
17.000
17.500
18.000
18.500
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
B
i
o
g
a
s
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
m
3
/
h
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
V
L
R
i
n
k
g
C
O
D
/
m
3
.
d
Biogas production Nm3/h VLR in kg COD / m3.d
Loading rate and biogas
37
VLR vs COD Efficiency
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0
VLR kg/m3/d
C
O
D
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Performance at high loading
Volumetric Loading Rate (VLR) in kg COD/m3.d
Loading rate versus biogas
38
Palm Wrth, Germany
Diameter 9.5 m Height 24 m Volume 2 x 1,680 m3
Flow 9,000 m3/d COD 5,500 mg/l COD 50 tpd
39
Papierfabrik Palm, Germany
TL, CM
BIOPAQ
IC
2 x 1680 m, Gasbuffer 500 m, Gasflare 1200 m/h
THIOPAQ
60/1.2
40
Ruhrverband, Germany
Tissue
BIOPAQ
IC
2 x 195 m
THIOPAQ
ECO
2004
41
Emin-Leydier, France
Diameter 9.5 m Height 24 m Volume 1,680 m3
Flow 6,500 m3/d COD 5,500 mg/l COD 36 tpd
42
Cartonneries de Gondardennes
France
TL, CM
Turn-key wwtp
Anaerbic + aerobic
BIOPAQ
IC 1190 m
Gasbuffer 30 m
Gasflare 900 m/h
2006
43
Rock-Tenn Solvay Paperboard,
USA
44
Smurfit Kappa, UK
IC 6 x 24 m Flow 3000 m3/d COD 6000 mg/l
45
Stora Enso, Germany
Hagen Kabel (LWC from spruce)
Diameter 2 x 8 m Flow 24,000 m3/d
Height 20 m COD 1,200 mg/l
Volume 2 x 1,000 m3 COD 30 ton/d
Eilenburg (DIP, Newsprint)
Diameter 4 x 5 m Flow 15,000 m3/d
Height 16 m COD 1,500 mg/l
Volume 4 x 310 m3 COD 22 ton/d
46
Mechanical Pulping
Process: TMP by Sound
Raw materials: Masson Pine
Production: 200tpd
WWTP biological start up in 2001
Nanping Paper, China
47
Mechanical Pulping
Process: PRC-APMP by Andritz
Raw materials: Aspen
Production: 500tpd
WWTP biological start up in 2002
Yueyang Paper, China
48
UPM Kymmene, Germany
SC/LWC
49
Fujian Nanping Paper, China
TMP/DIP
50
YueYang Paper, China
Mechanical Pulping: Aspen/Eucalyptus
51
Chen Loong, China
52
M-Real, Austria
Sulphite Condensate