Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cerny Fixed Retainer
Cerny Fixed Retainer
Original articles
1 Comparison of surgical and non-surgical methods of treating palatally impacted canines.
I Periodontal and pulpal outcomes
Kwok K. Ling, Christopher T.C. Ho, Olena Kravchuk and Richard J. Olive
8 Comparison of surgical and non-surgical methods of treating palatally impacted canines.
II Aesthetic outcomes
Kwok K. Ling, Christopher T.C. Ho, Olena Kravchuk and Richard J. Olive
16 Changes in interdental papillae heights following alignment of anterior teeth
Sanjivan Kandasamy, Mithran Goonewardene and Marc Tennant
24 The reliability of bonded lingual retainers
Robert Cerny
30 Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective cephalometric study
Hussam M. Abdel-Kader
36 Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal
slot inserts
Steven P. Jones and Gyaami Amoah
41 Lower intercanine width and gingival margin changes. A retrospective study
Luciane Closs, Karine Squeff, Dirceu Raveli and Cassiano Rsing
46 Effect of Topacal C-5 on enamel adjacent to orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study
Navid Karimi Nasab, Zahra Dalili Kajan and Azadeh Balalaie
50 The impact of orthodontic treatment on normative need. A case-control study in Peru
Eduardo Bernab, Socorro A. Borges-Yez and Carlos Flores-Mir
Review
55 Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations
Hong Jin Chan, Michael Woods and Damien Stella
Case reports
65 Treatment of skeletal 2 malocclusion using bone-plate anchorage. A case report
Kallaya Kraikosol, Charunee Rattanayatikul, Keith Godfrey and T. Vattraraphoudet
72 Space closure using the Hycon device. A case report
Viral A. Kachiwala, Anmol S. Kalha and J. Vigneshwaran
Editorial
76 Forty years of publication
Michael Harkness
General
78 Book reviews
81 Recent publications
84 New Products
86 Calendar
Australian
Orthodontic Journal
Volume 23 Number 1, May 2007
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007
Introduction
The preferred management of an ectopic or impacted
palatal canine is early diagnosis and interceptive
treatment, often involving extraction of the overlying
primary canine in the hope that the impaction will
resolve spontaneously.
18
The success of this form of
treatment appears to be related to the timing of treat-
ment and availability of space in the dental arch.
7,9,10
If diagnosis of an ectopic canine is delayed or if
extraction of the primary canine and creation of
excess space in the arch fails to correct an impaction,
the only reliable option appears to be surgical expo-
sure followed by orthodontic treatment to extrude
and position the impacted tooth in the arch.
Part of the reluctance for surgical treatment is the
likelihood of poor periodontal and pulpal out-
comes.
1116
However there is some dispute about
the clinical significance of undesirable periodontal
and pulpal changes following surgical exposure of
impacted canines.
13,15,17
The aims of this study were to compare the
periodontal and pulpal health of palatally
impacted maxillary canines following either surgical
exposure and assisted eruption or unassisted
eruption following extraction of the overlying
deciduous canine and orthodontic creation of space
in the arch.
Subjects and methods
Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the
Medical Research Ethics Committee of the University
of Queensland. The subjects were selected from the
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 1
Comparison of surgical and non-surgical methods
of treating palatally impacted canines.
I - Periodontal and pulpal outcomes
Kwok K. Ling,
*
Christopher T. C. Ho,
*
Olena Kravchuk
School of Dentistry,
*
School of Land and Food Sciences,
Brisbane, Australia
Background: Inferior periodontal and pulpal outcomes may follow surgical exposure of palatally impacted maxillary canines.
Objectives: To compare the periodontal and pulpal health of palatally impacted maxillary canines following either surgical
exposure and assisted eruption (SE) or unassisted eruption following extraction of the overlying deciduous canine and
orthodontic creation of space in the arch (OT).
Methods: Twentyeight subjects (OT group: N = 14; SE group: N = 14) with unilateral palatally impacted canines were
examined at least six months after orthodontic treatment. The gingival index score, plaque index score, pocket depth,
attachment loss, tenderness to percussion, pulpal responses to stimuli and radiographic assessment of changes in the pulpal
cavities and peri-radicular areas were collected on the maxillary canines, lateral incisors and premolars. The contralateral teeth
were used as controls.
Results: There were no significant differences in the plaque index scores, the gingival index scores or the periodontal outcomes
between the impacted canines in the two groups (SE and OT). More impacted canines than control canines had lost some
periodontal attachment in the SE group (p = 0.004). Although more lateral incisors, canines and premolars on the impacted
side had partially obliterated pulps than the corresponding teeth on the control side, the teeth in both groups had similar pulpal
responses (p = 0.064).
Conclusions: Natural eruption and conservative surgical exposure with orthodontic alignment have minor effects on the
periodontium. Impacted canines treated surgically and non-surgically had a higher prevalence of pulpal changes than the control
canines. Ultimately, the choice of treatment may depend on the clinical indications, the patients and the orthodontists preferences.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 17)
Received for publication: July 2006
Accepted: February 2007
records of three orthodontic practices providing they
met the following criteria:
1. A unilateral palatally impacted canine was present.
2. A pretreatment panoramic radiograph was available.
3. There was no significant medical history.
4. Treatment had been completed for at least six
months.
5. In the surgical group, the subjects had undergone
conservative surgical exposure and the wound had
been dressed for 710 days before any orthodontic
attachments were bonded.
Of the 28 subjects who met these requirements and
were examined at least six months post-treatment, 14
subjects (5 males, 9 females) had been treated by
extraction of the overlying deciduous canine and
creation of excess space in the arch (OT group) and
14 subjects (2 males, 12 females) had been treated by
open surgical exposure followed by orthodontic
extrusion and alignment of the canine in the arch (SE
group). In the latter group the surgery was performed
by different oral and maxillofacial surgeons and the
wounds were dressed for between seven and 10 days.
One orthodontist treated the subjects in the OT
group and three orthodontists treated the subjects in
the SE group. At the time of the post-treatment
examination the subjects in the OT group were, on
average, 19.1 years of age and the subjects in the SE
group were 18.8 years of age (Table I).
The pretreatment panoramic radiographs were used
to classify the sector of impaction using Lindauer
et al.s
18
modification of Ericson and Kurols
classification.
6
Two subjects in the OT group were
treated with extraction of both maxillary second pre-
molars.
Post-treatment assessments of the maxillary
lateral incisors, canines and first premolars
Periodontal assessments
The assessor (KKL) was blinded as to the identity of
the side with the impacted canine. Oral hygiene was
assessed with the Plaque Index,
19
and gingival health
with the Gingival Index.
20
Pocket depths were meas-
ured at six sites (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-
buccal, mesio-palatal, mid-palatal and disto-palatal)
around each tooth using a University of Michigan O
probe with Williams markings. Pocket depths were
measured from the gingival margins to the bottom of
the clinical pockets. The distance from the gingival
margin to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) was
also measured, and loss of attachment was deter-
mined by subtracting this distance from the pocket
depth measurement.
12,16
When the level of the CEJ
could not be located, it was assumed to be situated at
the bottom of the clinical pocket.
16
All clinical meas-
urements were made to the nearest 0.25 mm and
were repeated 10 minutes after the initial recordings.
Percussion and vitality assessments
Percussion tests were performed by tapping the incisal
edges or occlusal surfaces of the teeth with the blunt
end of a dental mirror handle. The response to this
test was recorded as either positive or negative. For
the cold thermal test each tooth was isolated with
cotton rolls and dried thoroughly. A cotton pellet
soaked with carbon dioxide spray (Miracold spray,
LING ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 2
Table I. Description of the sample.
OT (N=14) SE (N=14) p
p
+
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Male : Female 5 : 9 2 : 12 0.190
Right : Left proportion 8 : 6 4 : 10 0.127
Sector of impaction II : III : IV 5 : 7 : 2 1 : 4 : 9 0.019
Age at start of treatment (years) 13.5 (1.3) 13.5 (1.6) 0.979
Age at recall (years) 19.1 (2.2) 18.8 (2.5) 0.749
Active treatment duration (months) 27.9 (9.3) 28.4 (7.5) 0.877
Recall period (years) 3.4 (3.0) 3.2 (2.4) 0.847
Plaque Index
OT (N=14) 10 5 0.063
SE (N=14) 8 6 0.500
p
+
0.695 1
Gingival Index
OT (N=14) 7 3 0.219
SE (N=14) 10 6 0.219
p
+
0.440 0.420
McNemar test
+
Fishers Exact test Figure 1. Box plot of probing pocket depth for lateral incisors. Impacted
side (I); non-impacted side (N); mesio-buccal (MB); mid-buccal (MidB);
disto-buccal (DB); mesio-palatal (MP); mid-palatal (MidP); disto-palatal (DP).
Figure 2. Box plot of probing pocket depth for canines. Impacted side (I);
non-impacted side (N); mesio-buccal (MB); mid-buccal (MidB); disto-buccal
(DB); mesio-palatal (MP); mid-palatal (MidP); disto-palatal (DP).
Figure 3. Box plot of probing pocket depth for first premolars. Impacted
side (I); non-impacted side (N); mesio-buccal (MB); mid-buccal (MidB); disto-
buccal (DB); mesio-palatal (MP); mid-palatal (MidP); disto-palatal (DP).
P
o
c
k
e
t
d
e
p
t
h
(
m
m
)
P
o
c
k
e
t
d
e
p
t
h
(
m
m
)
P
o
c
k
e
t
d
e
p
t
h
(
m
m
)
Treatment
and sites
Treatment
and sites
Treatment
and sites
OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT
SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE
IMB NMB IMidB NmidB IDB NDB IMP NMP IMidP NMidP IDP NDP
OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT
SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE
IMB NMB IMidB NmidB IDB NDB IMP NMP IMidP NMidP IDP NDP
OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT OT
SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE
IMB NMB IMidB NmidB IDB NDB IMP NMP IMidP NMidP IDP NDP
Boxplot of pocket depth for first premolars, OT vs SE
Boxplot of pocket depth for lateral incisors, OT vs SE
Boxplot of pocket depth for canines, OT vs SE
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
significantly greater than the number of control
canines with loss of attachment (Table III). On the
impacted sides, attachment loss (in any site) was
found in five subjects (35.7 per cent) in the OT
group and in 10 subjects (71.4 per cent) in the SE
group. The proportion of subjects with attachment
loss on the impacted side in both groups was not
significantly different (Fishers Exact test; p = 0.128).
The maximum loss of attachment around any of the
six teeth tested was 1.75 mm. The maximum loss of
attachment in the SE group was greater than the loss
of attachment in the OT group at the 10 per cent
level of significance (Mood Median test: p = 0.058).
Ninety-five per cent confidence levels indicated that
SE treatment would result in a maximum attachment
loss of up to 1.01 mm greater than in the OT group.
All teeth tested responded normally to the percussion
test. More teeth failed to respond to the cold thermal
test (19 teeth) compared with the electrical pulp test
(2 teeth), but only two teeth did not respond to both
tests. One of these was a lateral incisor on the non-
impacted side in the OT group and the other was a
lateral incisor on the impacted side in the SE group.
The pulpal responses by the teeth in the SE and OT
groups were similar (p > 0.05).
None of the teeth (canines, lateral incisors, pre-
molars) showed periapical pathology on the radio-
graphs. Pulpal pathology was not detected in any
teeth on the control side in either group. The pulps
were partially obliterated in two premolars (14 per
cent) and one canine (7 per cent) on the impacted
side in the OT group, and in two lateral incisors (14
per cent) on the impacted side in the SE group. One
lateral incisor (7 per cent) on the impacted side from
the surgical group was endodontically treated prior to
orthodontic treatment due to trauma. Overall, four
out of 27 subjects (15 per cent) showed partial pulpal
obliteration or had root treatment on the impacted
side compared with the control side and this is sig-
nificant at the 10 per cent level of significance
(McNemar test, p = 0.064).
Discussion
Both methods of treatment for palatally impacted
maxillary canines had comparable periodontal and
pulpal outcomes. Both methods were accompanied
by minor periodontal changes, and a higher incidence
of pulpal changes occurred in the previously
impacted canines. The latter did not appear to be of
any clinical significance. The choice of treatment may
depend on the clinical situation, the patients and the
orthodontists preferences. Conservative surgical
exposure followed by assisted eruption was more
suited to severe impactions.
A potential problem with the present study is the
small sample size. Analysis of the required sample size
to detect a difference between the groups was not per-
formed as the magnitude of the difference between
the groups had not been previously tested. While
there was no indication that the small sample
affected our ability to draw conclusions regarding the
periodontal outcomes, a larger sample may have
improved our ability to detect a difference in the pul-
pal outcomes. The possibility of sampling bias cannot
be dismissed as any retrospective study may be prone
to selection bias, where patients unhappy with the
treatment outcome may be unwilling to participate in
the study, resulting in an underestimation of the com-
plications of the treatment. One of the strengths of
our study is our finding that the age of the subjects
and the duration of active treatment of the two
groups were similar.
Although we found more previously impacted
canines than control canines in the SE group had lost
SURGICAL AND NON- SURGICAL METHODS OF TREATING PALATALLY IMPACTED CANINES. I - PERIODONTAL AND PULPUL OUTCOMES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 5
Table III. Loss of periodontal attachment in the OT and SE groups.
OT SE OT vs SE
Teeth (N=14) (N=14) Impacted side
Impacted side Control side p
p
+
Lateral incisors 3 1 0.500 4 0 0.125 0.661
Canines 5 1 0.125 7 0 0.004 0.440
Premolars 2 1 1.000 2 0 0.500 1.000
School of Dentistry,
*
School of Land and Food Sciences,
Brisbane, Australia
Background: Palatally impacted maxillary canines may appear unsightly after treatment because of changes in position and
colour.
Aim: To determine if palatally impacted canines treated either by surgical exposure and orthodontic repositioning or by creation
of space in the arch and unassisted eruption have different aesthetic outcomes.
Methods: Twenty eight subjects with unilateral palatally impacted canines who had completed orthodontic treatment at least
6 months previously were recruited from three specialist practices. In 14 subjects the canines had been treated by surgical
exposure, orthodontic extrusion and repositioning in the arch (SE group) and in the remainder the deciduous canines were
extracted and excess space created in the arch for the canines to erupt naturally (OT group). The contralateral canines were
used as controls. The mean pretreatment ages of the subjects in the SE and OT groups were 13.5 (SD: 1.6) years and 13.5
(SD: 1.3) years respectively. The position and colour of the canines were assessed on post-treatment study models and 35 mm
slides using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO OGS) and subjective appraisal by two
orthodontists. Each subject used a semantic scale to rate the aesthetic outcome of treatment.
Results: Sixty four per cent of the treated canines in the SE group were significantly more intruded than the treated canines
in the OT group (p = 0.004) and the control canines (p = 0.004). The ABO OGS grades of the canines in the SE and OT
groups were similar (p = 0.173). While the assessors detected a lack of labial root torque and gingival margin changes in
the canines in the SE group, the subjects in both groups were satisfied with the appearance of the canines post-treatment.
Conclusions: Palatally impacted canines treated by surgical exposure, extrusion and orthodontic treatment were more likely to
be displaced vertically (intruded) after treatment than palatally impacted canines treated by extraction of the overlying
deciduous canines and creation of excess space in the arch. Small occlusal and aesthetic changes detected by the
orthodontists, but not the ABO OGS, did not appear to detract from the satisfaction of the subjects with the results of
orthodontic treatment.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 815)
Received for publication: July 2006
Accepted: February 2007
extraction of the overlying primary canine and cre-
ation of excess space in the arch, the most reliable
treatment option is surgical exposure and ortho-
dontic repositioning of the impacted tooth in the
arch.
A reliable and objective method is required to evalu-
ate tooth position following treatment. Previous stud-
ies have relied on assessments by orthodontists, by
other dental professional groups, by the public, and
measuring instruments, such as the American Board
of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO
OGS).
5,1316
The ABO OGS scores eight criteria,
which are considered to provide a reliable and objec-
tive appraisal of tooth position.
16
There have been no
previous reports of the use of the ABO OGS to deter-
mine the stability, or otherwise, of specific traits of
malocclusion. A trained and observant eye may detect
minor deviations in tooth position(s) that patients
may be either unaware of or are satisfied with.
17,18
Patient perception and satisfaction may be assessed
with instruments such as a semantic scale or a
questionnaire.
The principal aim of this retrospective study was to
determine if palatally impacted canines treated either
by surgical exposure and orthodontic repositioning or
by creation of space in the arch and unassisted erup-
tion have different aesthetic outcomes. Additional
aims were to determine if the ABO OGS could be
used to assess the positions of the canines after treat-
ment and to determine if the method of treatment
influenced patient satisfaction.
Material and methods
Ethical clearance for this study was granted by the
Medical Research Ethics Committee of the University
of Queensland. Twenty eight subjects with unilateral
palatally impacted canines who had completed ortho-
dontic treatment at least 6 months previously were
recruited from three specialist practices. In 14 sub-
jects the canines had been treated by surgical
exposure, orthodontic extrusion and repositioning in
the arch (SE group) and in the remainder, the decid-
uous canines were extracted and excess space created
in the arch for the canines to erupt naturally (OT
group). Subjects were selected if they met the
following criteria:
1. A unilateral palatally impacted canine was present.
2. A pretreatment panoramic radiograph was
available.
3. There was no significant medical history.
4. Treatment had been completed at least six months
previously.
5. In the surgical group, the subjects had undergone
conservative surgical exposure and the wound had
been dressed for 710 days before any orthodontic
attachments were bonded.
The 14 subjects (5 males, 9 females) in the OT group
had a mean age of 19.1 (SD: 2.2) years and the mean
post-treatment period was 3.4 (SD: 3.0) years. The
same orthodontist treated all subjects in the OT
group. The 14 subjects (2 males, 12 females) in the
SE group had a mean age of 18.8 (SD: 2.5) years and
the mean post-treatment period was 3.2 (SD: 2.4)
years (Table I). Three orthodontists treated the sub-
jects in the SE group. The pretreatment panoramic
radiographs were used to classify the sector of
impaction using Lindauer et al. modification
19
of
Ericson and Kurols classification.
9
No sector I
impacted canines were included in the study.
DIFFERENT METHODS OF TREATING PALATALLY IMPACTED CANINES. II - AESTHETIC OUTCOMES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 9
Table I. Description of the sample.
OT (N=14) SE (N=14) p
p
+
Mean SD Mean SD
Male : Female 5 : 9 2 : 12 0.190
Right : Left proportion 8 : 6 4 : 10 0.127
Sector of impaction II : III : IV 5 : 7 : 2 1 : 4 : 9 0.019
Age at start of treatment (years) 13.5 1.3 13.5 1.6 0.979
Age at recall (years) 19.1 2.2 18.8 2.5 0.749
Active treatment duration (months) 27.9 9.3 28.4 7.5 0.877
Recall period (years) 3.4 3.0 3.2 2.4 0.847
Chi-squared test, significant value in bold
+ Students t - test
American Board of Orthodontics Objective
Grading System
All subjects had a wax occlusal record and alginate
impressions of both arches taken at the post-
treatment assessment. The resulting study models
were scored by a single examiner (KKL) with no prior
knowledge of the side of impaction or the method of
treatment. The alignment, marginal ridges, bucco-
lingual inclinations, interproximal contacts, overjet,
occlusal contacts and occlusal relationships of the
teeth were assessed with the ABO OGS and the
standardised measuring gauge. Root angulations were
not assessed because post-treatment panoramic radio-
graphs were not available. For each criterion, points
were assigned based on the degree to which a
relationship deviated from ideal. The individual com-
ponents were scored and summed to yield an overall
score. To assess intra-examiner reliability the ABO
OGS scoring was repeated one week later.
Canine position and dental midline
The positions of both maxillary canines in each sub-
ject in relation to the adjacent teeth and the upper
and lower dental midlines were analysed on the
dental casts by one examiner. Intrusions, rotations
and palatal translations were recorded as present or
absent. Canines were classified as intruded when
there was no inter-arch contact or the height differ-
ence between the canines and adjacent teeth was
greater than one millimetre. A rotation was recorded
if a tooth was rotated more than five degrees. A
canine was in palatal translation if the buccal overjet
was reduced by more than one millimetre, if the
tooth was in edge-to-edge relationship or in lingual
cross-bite. The upper and lower dental midlines were
measured with digital callipers.
Canine colour and side of impaction
Two independent orthodontists (Assessor A and
Assessor B) subjectively assessed the colour of the
maxillary canines on projected 35 mm Kodachrome
slides of the frontal smile, the anterior occlusal view
and the upper occlusal view. The slides were taken at
standardised settings with the same camera at the
post-treatment assessments. The assessors were
unaware of the side of impaction and method of
treatment. They were asked to assess the colour of
both canines and to identify the side of impaction
from the dental casts and colour slides.
Questionnaire
Subject satisfaction with the overall appearance of the
canines, colour of the canines, colour of the lateral
incisors and position of the canines were evaluated by
questionnaire. The subjects were asked to rate their
satisfaction with each of the four characteristics on a
5 point scale. The scale was anchored with the
descriptors, very satisfied and very dissatisfied.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out with Minitab for
Windows (Release 14, Minitab Inc., USA) and the
level of significance for all statistical procedures was
set at 5 per cent. Additionally, SPSS for Windows
(Version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) was used to
perform the McNemar test. The Bonferroni correc-
tion was applied when appropriate. The age of the
subjects at commencement of active treatment, ages
at recall, the durations of treatment and the post-
treatment follow-up periods in the groups were
compared with Students t-tests. Chi-squared tests
were used to determine if there were different pro-
portions of subjects in the impaction sectors in the SE
and OT groups. The durations of treatment carried
out by the three orthodontists were examined with
the one-way analysis of variance. Post-hoc Tukey tests
were used to test the differences between pairs of
orthodontists.
Intra-observer duplication error for the ABO OGS
overall score was tested with the paired t-test. Overall
ABO OGS scores were analysed for the two treat-
ment groups. A one-way ANOVA was used to check
for a difference in ABO OGS scores between ortho-
dontists. Attribute agreement analysis (Cohens
Kappa) was used to examine the intra-examiner relia-
bility in determination of deviation from an ideal
canine position. As the results indicated a high degree
of reliability (Kappa: 0.65-1), either the initial or the
second set of measurements was chosen randomly to
be tested with Fishers Exact test for differences in the
proportions of canine intrusion, rotation and palatal
displacement in the groups. Comparison within each
group (palatally impacted canine versus the contra-
lateral canine) was tested with McNemar tests.
Differences in midline deviations between OT and
SE groups were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test.
Inter-examiner agreement for canine colour and iden-
tification of a previously palatally impacted maxillary
LING ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 10
canine from dental casts and colour slides were
analysed using attribute agreement analysis and
Cohens Kappa. The inter-examiner agreement was
low. Thus, results from each orthodontist assessor
were analysed separately with Fishers Exact test.
Ordinal data from the questionnaires assessing
patient satisfaction were analysed with the Mann-
Whitney U test.
Results
The results are given in Tables IVI and Figures 13.
There were significantly more sector IV canines in the
SE group and the durations of active treatment of the
three orthodontists were significantly different
(Tables I and II). The post-hoc Tukey test disclosed
that Orthodontist A took significantly longer than
Orthodontists B and C to complete treatment, but
there was no difference in the time taken by Ortho-
dontists B and C to complete treatment (Table II).
The scatter plot of the treatment duration versus age
at the commencement of treatment did not indicate
any relationship between the two variables (Figure 1).
Approximately 41 per cent of the variability in treat-
ment time of the subjects in the SE group was
accounted for by age at the commencement of treat-
ment and the orthodontist providing the treatment
(SE group: r-square, 40.68 per cent).
There was no statistically significant difference
between the two sets of ABO OGS overall scores
(p = 0.224). The first set of scores were used for
further analysis. When the distribution of the ABO
OGS overall scores was examined, nine subjects in
the OT group (64 per cent) and six subjects in the SE
group (43 per cent) had overall scores greater than 30
and failed to meet the treatment standards of the
DIFFERENT METHODS OF TREATING PALATALLY IMPACTED CANINES. II - AESTHETIC OUTCOMES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 11
Table II. Duration of active treatment.
Treatment duration (Months) p
Mean SD Range
Orthodontist A
(N=3) 37.67 (4.16)
a
3341
Orthodontist B
N=8) 28.13 (5.08)
b
2136
Orthodontist C
(N=3) 20.00 (5.00)
b
1525
0.004
Different letters in the Mean (SD) column indicate a significant
difference
One-way ANOVA, significant value in bold
Figure 1. Treatment duration versus age at the commencement of active
treatment.
Table III. Frequency of intrusion, rotation and palatal translation of previously impacted canines (PIMC).
Intrusion Rotation Palatal translation
PIMC Control p
+
PIMC Control p
+
PIMC Control p
+
OT (N=14) 1 0 1.000 4 0 0.125 1 1 1.000
SE (N=14) 9 0 0.004 8 1 0.039 4 0 0.125
p
Assessor A 2 5 0.190
Assessor B 1 1 1.000
Chi-squared test
Treatment commencement age (Years)
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
d
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
M
o
n
t
h
s
)
Ortho/Surgical
OT
SE
ABO. The ABO OGS scores for the OT (Mean:
39.9; SD:14.7) and SE (Mean: 32.6; SD:13.0)
groups were not significantly different (p = 0.173).
There were no significant differences between the
overall scores for the patients in the SE group treated
by each of the three orthodontists. The mean overall
ABO OGS scores for orthodontists A, B and C were
22.83, 36.88 and 30.83 respectively.
The number of previously impacted and control
(contralateral) canines that were intruded, rotated
and/or palatally placed in the OT and SE groups are
given in Table III. Nine out of 14 treated canines (64
per cent) in the SE group were intruded. Of the
treated canines more teeth were intruded in the SE
group compared with the OT group (p = 0.004) and
the control canines (p = 0.004). The latter finding
was statistically significant after the Bonferroni
correction had been applied. In the SE group more
treated canines were rotated at recall than control
canines (p = 0.039). There was no significant differ-
ence in midline deviations in the OT (Mean: 0.40
mm) and SE (Mean: 0.66 mm) groups. The
maximum midline deviations in the OT and SE
groups were 2.58 mm and 1.58 mm respectively
(Figure 2).
There were no significant inter-group differences in
the colour of the previously impacted teeth (Table
IV). Assessor A correctly identified 11 previously
impacted canines in the OT group and 12 teeth the
SE group (Table V). Assessor B was uncertain in eight
(57 per cent) cases in the OT group and two cases in
the SE group (14 per cent). Assessor B correctly iden-
tified five cases in the OT group and 12 cases in the
SE group. Both assessors used differences in inclina-
tion and the appearance of the labial and palatal
gingival contours to identify previously impacted
canines.
The subjects were generally satisfied or very satis-
fied with the colour and positions of the treated
canines. Only one subject in the OT group chose
very dissatisfied as the response to the question
about overall appearance. Similarly, the majority of
subjects were satisfied or very satisfied with the
colour of the lateral incisors and only one subject
from each group was dissatisfied. There were no sig-
nificant differences between the OT and SE groups to
the questions relating to overall satisfaction, colour of
the lateral incisors, colour and position of previously
impacted maxillary canines (Table VI). There was
also no significant difference between the OT and SE
LING ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 12
Figure 2. Individual post-treatment dental midline deviation. Figure 3. Overall ABO OGS score versus total satisfaction score.
A high score indicates a poor occlusal outcome and a low score greater
satisfaction.
Table V. Identification of previously impacted canines by two orthodontists.
OT (N=14) SE (N=14)
Incorrect Correct Uncertain Incorrect Correct Uncertain
Assessor A 3 11 0 2 12 0
Assessor B 1 5 8 0 12 2
Ortho/Surgical
Total satisfaction score
D
e
n
t
a
l
m
i
d
l
i
n
e
d
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
m
)
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
A
B
O
O
G
S
s
c
o
r
e
Ortho/Surgical
OT
SE
95% CI for the mean
groups when the scores of the four questions were
combined (p = 0.448). Finally, there was no signifi-
cant correlation between the combined satisfaction
scores and the ABO OGS scores (Figure 3).
Discussion
We set out to determine if palatally impacted canines
surgically exposed and repositioned in the arch had
better crown colour and position than canines per-
mitted to erupt naturally after excess space had been
created in the maxillary arch. Although the clinicians
were able to identify small variations in the positions
of the canines that the ABO OGS could not pick up,
the subjects were generally very satisfied with the out-
come.
The main limitation in this study is related to the
method of sampling. In this study, consecutively
treated patients fitting the inclusion criteria were
retrospectively identified and invited to participate.
The participation rate was only 58 per cent, which
resulted in a relatively small sample. Bias due to satis-
fied patients being more likely to participate in the
study cannot be eliminated. Another problem relat-
ing to the small sample size is the possibility of
having a Type II error, so that the null hypothesis is
wrongly accepted due the inability to detect a differ-
ence. The probability of a Type II error decreases as
the sample size increases. While the best strategy is to
obtain the largest possible sample, this was not pos-
sible because of the low participation rate.
20
A future
prospective study would be able to address some of
these concerns. There are also recognised objections
to the validity of findings from questionnaires, since
some respondents might have been inclined to select
the perceived right answer and selecting a suitable
answer format inevitably inhibits free expression.
21
Hence, the findings from the patient satisfaction
survey in this study may be optimistic.
Ideal alignment in the present study was 71 per cent
in the OT group and 14 per cent in the surgical
group. The result from the surgical group was much
lower than reported in the literature, which ranges
from 4048 per cent.
2,3,5
The differences between the
studies may be due to the differences in the criteria
for determining rotation, intrusion and palatal trans-
lation. Generally, it is accepted that some degree of
relapse is inevitable,
25
but the changes found in this
study were surprising. In the SE group, the previ-
ously impacted canines were intruded in nine subjects
(64 per cent) and rotated in eight subjects (57 per
cent). These are much higher proportions than in the
OT group or on the control sides in both groups.
Palatal displacement was a marginally less frequent
finding with four subjects (29 per cent) in the SE
group affected. Even though four subjects (29 per
cent) in the OT group presented with rotation of
previously impacted canines, palatal displacement
and intrusion rarely occurred in this group.
A concern with the technique of allowing an
impacted canine to erupt naturally is that a residual
DIFFERENT METHODS OF TREATING PALATALLY IMPACTED CANINES. II - AESTHETIC OUTCOMES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 13
Table VI. Subject satisfaction post-treatment.
Very satisfied Satisfied Dont know Not satisfied Very dissatisfied p
Overall appearance OT 6 7 0 0 1
(Impacted canines) SE 6 8 0 0 0
0.872
Colour (PIMC) OT 5 8 0 1 0
(Impacted canines) SE 2 12 0 0 0
0.505
Colour - lateral OT 5 8 0 1 0
incisors SE 2 7 4 1 0
0.108
Position OT 5 7 1 1 0
(Impacted canines) SE 5 8 1 0 0
0.836
Mann-Whitney U test
dental midline deviation may persist post-treatment.
The technique involves the creation of excess space of
up to 10 mm and may require proclination and
displacement of the maxillary incisors across the mid-
line. Investigation of midline deviations yielded no
significant difference between the groups.
The ABO OGS found the scores for both groups
were similar, implying a similar standard of finishing
or amount of relapse. However, the scores did not
agree with the clinical assessment. The main reason
for the failure to detect a difference could be related
to the method of scoring the models. The full ABO
OGS sums the discrepancies in all criteria and it is
not sensitive enough to detect a small departure from
the ideal position, and it is not designed to assess the
positional deviation(s) of an impacted canine.
One of the factors that may influence the occlusal
outcome is the duration of active orthodontic treat-
ment.
22,23
In the present study there was no signifi-
cant difference between the groups in the duration of
treatment. The mean duration of treatment in the SE
group was 28 months and was comparable with other
studies where active eruption was used following
surgical exposure.
3,24
There was no colour difference between the canines
in the two groups. It was not possible to determine
the incidence of discolouration because of the poor
agreement between the assessors. Identification of
previously impacted canines by the two assessors also
showed poor agreement, although they were more
likely to correctly identify a previously impacted
canine in the SE group than in the OT group. The
lesser amount of relapse in the OT group may have
made identification of a previously impacted canine
difficult.
There was a high level of patient satisfaction follow-
ing both methods of treatment. Only one subject
from the OT group expressed dissatisfaction with
treatment, but this was not correlated with the
occlusal outcome, as demonstrated by the ABO OGS
score for this subject. Clustering of the satisfaction
scores in this study into a narrow range, irrespective
of the ABO OGS scores, indicates satisfaction was not
dependent on or correlated with occlusal outcome
(Figure 3). Overall, palatally impacted canines cor-
rected by extraction of the overlying primary canine and
orthodontic space opening showed better alignment
and less relapse than canines managed with surgical
exposure, extrusion and orthodontic alignment.
Conclusions
1. Palatally impacted canines treated by surgical
exposure, extrusion and orthodontic treatment were
more likely to relapse vertically than those treated by
extraction of the overlying deciduous canines and
creation of excess space in the arch.
2. The ABO OGS failed to detect small changes in
the positions of the canines in both groups.
3. There were no colour differences between the pre-
viously impacted canines in the two groups. The
assessors correctly identified high percentages of pre-
viously impacted canines in the surgical group, but
not the non-surgical group.
4. The subjects in both groups were satisfied with the
outcome of treatment.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the
Australian Society of Orthodontists Foundation for
Research and Education. The authors would like to
thank the orthodontists who were involved in this
study for their assistance with assembling the sample
and collecting the data.
Corresponding author
Dr R. J. Olive
141 Queen Street
Brisbane, Qld 4000
Australia
Email: r.h.olive@uq.net.au
References
1. Bennett JC, McLaughlin PP. Orthodontic management of
the dentition with the preadjusted appliance. Isis Medical
Media Ltd.; 1997.
2. Becker A, Kohavi D, Zilberman Y. Periodontal status fol-
lowing the alignment of palatally impacted canine teeth. Am
J Orthod 1983;84:3326.
3. Woloshyn H, Artun J, Kennedy DB, Joondeph DR. Pulpal
and periodontal reactions to orthodontic alignment of
palatally impacted canines. Angle Orthod 1994;64:25764.
4. Blair GS, Hobson RS, Leggat TG. Posttreatment assessment
of surgically exposed and orthodontically aligned impacted
maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;
113:32932.
5. DAmico RM, Bjerklin K, Kurol J, Falahat B. Long-term
results of orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary
canines. Angle Orthod 2003;73:2318.
6. Bishara SE. Clinical management of impacted maxillary
canines. Semin Orthod 1998;4:8798.
7. Karpagam S, Chacko RK. Guidelines for management of
impacted canines. Indian J Dent Res 2004;15:4853.
LING ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 14
DIFFERENT METHODS OF TREATING PALATALLY IMPACTED CANINES. II - AESTHETIC OUTCOMES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 15
8. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically
erupting maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1987;91:48392.
9. Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting
maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur
J Orthod 1988;10:28395.
10. Power SM, Short MB. An investigation into the response of
palatally displaced canines to the removal of deciduous
canines and an assessment of factors contributing to
favourable eruption. Br J Orthod 1993;20:21523.
11. Leonardi M, Armi P, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Two interceptive
approaches to palatally displaced canines: a prospective lon-
gitudinal study. Angle Orthod 2004;74:5816.
12. Olive RJ. Orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted max-
illary canines. Aust Orthod J 2002;18:6470.
13. Scott SA, Freer TJ. Visual application of the American
Board of Orthodontics grading system. Aust Orthod J 2005;
21:5560.
14. Shaw WC, Richmond S, OBrien KD, Brook P, Stephens
CD. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment
need and treatment standards. Br Dent J 1991;170:10712.
15. Tang EL, Wei SH. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a
review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1993;103:34451.
16. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD,
Cangialosi TJ et al. Objective grading system for dental casts
and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Ortho-
dontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:
58999.
17. Miller CJ. The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics.
Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:15764.
18. Kokich VO, Jr., Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the per-
ception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics.
J Esthet Dent 1999;11:31124.
19. Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC,
Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with
panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:912,
957.
20. Rinchuse DJ, Sweitzer EM, Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DL.
Understanding science and evidence-based decision making
in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;
127:61824.
21. Shaw WC, Gbe MJ, Jones BM. The expectations of ortho-
dontic patients in South Wales and St Louis, Missouri. Br J
Orthod 1979;6:2035.
22. Lobb WK, Ismail AI, Andrews CL, Spracklin TE. Evaluation
of orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:705.
23. Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes
assessment using the peer assessment rating index. Angle
Orthod 2001;71:1649.
24. Iramaneerat S, Cunningham SJ, Horrocks EN. The effect of
two alternative methods of canine exposure upon subsequent
duration of orthodontic treatment. Int J Paediatr Dent
1998;8:1239.
Introduction
Orthodontic alignment of overlapped incisors can
reduce the apparent heights of the interdental papil-
lae leading to unsightly dark triangles or open
gingival embrasures.
13
It has been suggested that as
overlapped teeth are aligned the interdental papillae
stretch, their heights reduce and open gingival
embrasures develop.
13
Other factors, such as alveolar
bone levels, crown form, contact relationships, pre-
treatment crowding,
46
age,
7
and orthodontic effects
on the gingival fibres may also play a part in the
causation of open gingival embrasures or dark tri-
angles. Recently, Ko-Kimura et al.
8
and Ikeda et al.
9
reported that open gingival embrasures were associ-
ated with resorption of the alveolar crest, and were
more frequently found in patients over 20 years of
age.
Two factors believed to influence the form of the gin-
gival tissues post-treatment are the direction of tooth
movement and the faciolingual thickness of the sup-
porting bone and soft tissue.
10
For example, during
lingual or palatal tooth movement the gingival tissue
on the facial aspect of a tooth thickens and migrates
occlusally. The reverse may occur when teeth are
moved labially.
1113
Providing a tooth is moved with-
in the alveolar process the risk of gingival recession is
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 16
Changes in interdental papillae heights following
alignment of anterior teeth
Sanjivan Kandasamy,
*
Mithran Goonewardene
*
and Marc Tennant
Perth, Australia
Background: Orthodontic alignment of overlapped incisors can reduce the apparent heights of the interdental papillae leading
to unsightly dark triangles or open gingival embrasures.
Aim: To determine if certain pretreatment contact point relationships between the maxillary anterior teeth were accompanied by
changes in the heights of the interdental papillae after orthodontic alignment.
Methods: Pre- and post-treatment intra-oral 35 mm slides, lateral cephalometric radiographs and study casts of 143 patients
(60 males, 83 females) between 13 and 16 years of age were used. The patients had diastamata closed, imbricated teeth
aligned and palatally or labially placed teeth repositioned. A sample of 25 patients (12 males, 13 females) between 13 and
16 years of age who had well-aligned anterior teeth at the start of treatment acted as a control group. All patients were
treated for approximately 18 months. The clinical crowns of the maxillary incisors and the heights of the interdental papilla
between the incisors were measured on projected images of the slides. The percentage increases or reductions in the heights of
the interdental papillae were compared.
Results: The heights of the interdental papillae increased following palatal movement of labially placed (p < 0.05) or
imbricated (p < 0.05) incisors and the intrusion of one incisor relative to an adjacent incisor (p < 0.01). The heights of the
interdental papillae reduced following labial movement of an imbricated (p < 0.05) or palatally placed (p < 0.05) incisor or
closure of a diastema (p < 0.01). Before treatment the midline papillae in the diastema subgroup were of similar length to the
midline papillae in the control group, but after treatment they were markedly shorter. The interdental papillae associated with
crowded or imbricated incisors were shorter than the interdental papillae in the control group before and after treatment.
Conclusions: Dark triangles are less likely to develop following palatal movement of labially placed or imbricated teeth and the
intrusion of one tooth relative to another. On the other hand, dark triangles are more likely to develop following labial move-
ment of imbricated or palatally placed incisors and closure of a diastema. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of dark
triangles developing in the latter group, particularly in older patients.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 1623)
Received for publication: July 2006
Accepted: January 2007
minimal, irrespective of the dimensions or quality of
the gingival tissue.
14
The aim of this study was to determine if certain pre-
treatment contact point relationships between the
maxillary anterior teeth were accompanied by
changes in the heights of the interdental papillae after
orthodontic alignment.
Materials and methods
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the
Human Research Ethics Committee of the University
of Western Australia. All assessments were carried out
in accordance with the guidelines of the National
Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
All patients who commenced treatment in a private
orthodontic practice in 1996 and required alignment
of the upper anterior teeth were eligible for the study.
Patients with poor oral hygiene exhibiting swollen,
erythematous and/or hyperplastic gingivae, with
incomplete records and when two or more of the
contact relationships given in Table I were present,
were excluded. Patients with the latter condition were
excluded because the interdental papilla between the
teeth could be influenced differently by the different
tooth movements required to align the teeth. A total
of 143 patients (60 males, 83 females) between 13
and 16 years of age (Mean age: 14 years 7 months)
were available for the experimental group. A sample
of 25 patients (12 males, 13 females) who received
orthodontic treatment in the same practice, but
who had well aligned anterior teeth at the start of
treatment acted as a control group. These patients
were also between 13 and 16 years of age (Mean age:
14 years 4 months).
Pre- and post-treatment intra-oral 35 mm slides,
lateral cephalometric radiographs and study casts
were used. The intra-oral frontal photographs were
taken at the same magnification and standardised by
positioning the upper midline in the centre of the
view finder and sighting along the occlusal plane. All
patients were treated for approximately 18 months
and the post-treatment photographs were taken four
weeks after appliance removal. The pre- and post-
treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs were
used to assess qualitatively the overall direction of
maxillary incisor movement. The study models were
used to determine the arrangement of the anterior
teeth and allocation into the groups given in Table I.
The clinical crowns (incisal edge lowest point on
the gingival margin) of the central and lateral incisors
and the heights of the interdental papillae between
the incisors (tip of an interdental papilla to the line
joining the lowest points on the gingival margins of
adjacent incisors) were measured twice on standard-
ised images of the slides projected onto a white back-
ground (Figure 1). The maxillary incisors in both
experimental and control groups were measured.
Because it was not possible to measure the inter-
dental and crown heights precisely if adjacent teeth
were at different inclinations or displaced palatally/
labially, and pretreatment measurements of the
cemento-enamel junction gingival margin distances
CHANGES IN INTERDENTAL PAPILLAE HEIGHTS FOLLOWING ALIGNMENT OF ANTERIOR TEETH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 17
Table I. Definitions.
Relationship Definition
Diastema The horizontal space between
adjacent incisors
Vertical discrepancy Adjacent incisors in different vertical
positions
Imbricated Incisors arranged in an overlapping
manner, one incisor may be palatally
or labially placed relative to the other
incisor
Labially or palatally Labially or palatally placed incisors.
placed incisors with Study models and lateral intraoral
no overlap photographs were used to determine
if an incisor was imbricated or
labially/palatally placed.
Figure 1. Crown height was measured from the incisal edge to the highest
point on the gingival margin. Interdental papilla height was measured from
the tip of an interdental papilla to the line joining the highest points on the
gingival margins of adjacent incisors.
were not available, the data were converted to per-
centages. The percentage loss or gain in the height of
an interdental papilla(e) were obtained by dividing
the mean height of the interdental papilla(e) by the
mean length of the clinical crowns of the incisors on
either side of the papilla(e) and converting the result
to a percentage. The mean pre- and post-treatment
percentage values were then used to obtain the
percentage increases or reductions.
The statistical analyses were performed using the
Intercooled Stata 8.0 statistical package (SPSS,
Chicago, Illinois, USA). Values of p less than 0.05
were considered significant. All measurements were
repeated by the same examiner two weeks later.
Results of the paired t-test showed there were no
significant differences at the 5 per cent level of signif-
icance between the first and second sets of measure-
ments. To improve the reliability of these measure-
ments the means of both sets of measurements were
used in all subsequent calculations.
Results
The results are given in Table II and Figures 27.
Control group
The mean pre- and post-treatment heights of the
interdental papillae in the control group were 45.6
and 47.1 per cent respectively. The difference
between the pre- and post-treatment heights was not
statistically significant.
Experimental group
Diastema
The diastemata were closed in 28 patients (Table II,
Figure 2). Following closure of diastemata the inter-
dental papillae between the central incisors were
significantly shorter at the end of treatment (Mean
difference: -10.5 per cent; p < 0.01). The post-
treatment heights of the interdental papillae in the
experimental sample were also significantly shorter
than the post-treatment heights of the interdental
papillae in the control group (Mean difference: -9.1
per cent; p < 0.01).
Vertical discrepancy
Before treatment the heights of the interdental papil-
lae in this group were significantly shorter than the
pretreatment heights of the interdental papillae in
the control group (Mean difference: -10.2 per cent;
p < 0.01). The control experimental difference after
treatment was not significant. Following correction of
a vertical discrepancy the interdental papillae
increased in height significantly (Mean difference: 8.1
per cent; p < 0.01). Pre- and post-treatment views of
a typical case are shown in Figure 3.
KANDASAMY ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 18
Table II. Pretreatment and post-treatment comparisons.
Group N Mean Pretreatment p Mean Intra-group p Post-treatment p
pretreatment difference post-treatment change difference
height E minus C height (Per cent) E minus C
(Per cent) (Per cent) (Per cent) (Per cent)
Control 25 56.6 (8.1) 47.1 (8.1) 1.5 NS
Diastema 28 48.5 (7.5) - 2.9 NS 38.0 (8.8) -10.5 0.01 -9.1 0.01
Vertical 31 35.4 (8.6) -10.2 0.01 43.5 (7.7) 8.1 0.01 -3.6 NS
discrepancy
Labially 11 34.6 (7.8) -11.0 0.01 45.1 (9.6) 10.5 0.01 -2.0 NS
overlapped
Palatally 25 43.3 (7.8) -2.3 NS 41.0 (6.1) -2.3 NS -6.1 0.01
overlapped
Labially 10 31.0 (8.3) -14.6 0.01 38.9 (8.6) 7.9 0.01 -8.2 0.05
placed
Palatally 28 42.8 (7.4) -2.8 NS 40.8 (6.5) -2.0 0.05 -6.3 0.01
E, experimental; C, control
NS, not significant
Standard deviations in brackets
Significant values in bold
Imbrication labially overlapped
There were 11 subjects with labially overlapped
teeth (Figure 4). The mean pre- and post-treatment
heights of the interdental papillae were 34.6 and
45.1 per cent respectively. The pretreatment heights
of the interdental papillae in the experimental
group were 11.0 per cent shorter than the pretreat-
ment papillae in the control group (p < 0.01). The
interdental papillae were significantly longer at the
end of treatment (Mean difference: 10.5 per cent;
p < 0.01)
Imbrication palatally overlapped
At the start of treatment the heights of the interden-
tal papillae in the 25 control and 25 experimental
patients were similar. The mean heights of the inter-
dental papillae pre- and post-treatment were also
similar. But after treatment the heights of the inter-
dental papillae in the experimental group were signif-
icantly shorter than the heights of the interdental
papillae in the control group (Mean difference: 6.1
per cent; p < 0.01). Pre- and post-treatment views of
a typical case are shown in Figure 5.
Labially placed
Before treatment the heights of the interdental papil-
lae in this group of 10 patients were significantly
shorter than the interdental papillae in the 25
patients in the control group (Mean difference: -14.6
per cent; p < 0.01). During treatment the papillae
increased in length significantly (Mean difference: 7.9
per cent; p < 0.01), but remained significantly short-
er than the post-treatment papillae in the control
group (Mean difference: -8.2 per cent; p < 0.05). Pre-
CHANGES IN INTERDENTAL PAPILLAE HEIGHTS FOLLOWING ALIGNMENT OF ANTERIOR TEETH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 19
(2a)
(2b)
Figure 2. Closure of a diastema.Pretreatment (a) and post-treatment
(b) views.
(3a)
(3b)
Figure 3. Vertical discrepancy between the central and lateral incisors.
Pretreatment (a) and post-treatment (b) views.
and post-treatment views of a typical arrangement in
this group are shown in Figure 6.
Palatally placed
Before treatment the heights of the interdental papil-
lae in this group were similar to the heights of the
interdental papillae in the control subjects. The inter-
dental papillae were, however, significantly shorter
post-treatment (Mean difference: 2.0 per cent;
p < 0.05) and significantly shorter than the papillae in
the control group post-treatment (Mean difference:
-6.3 per cent; p < 0.01). A typical example is shown
in Figure 7.
Discussion
The present study confirms previous investigations
that palatal movement of labially displaced or imbric-
ated teeth and the intrusion of one tooth relative to
another tooth increases the height(s) of the inter-
dental papilla(e). It also confirms previous reports
that the height(s) of the interdental papilla(e) reduce
following labial movement of an imbricated or
palatally placed incisor. The finding that the inter-
dental papilla reduced substantially when a diastema
was closed is puzzling: it may be a normal age change
or it may have occurred because one or both central
incisors were extruded or moved labially during
closure of the diastema. Before treatment the papillae
connected to the labial frenum were of similar length
to the papillae in the control group, but after treat-
ment they were markedly shorter. At the outset the
papillae associated with labially overlapped incisors
were shorter than papillae in the control group, but
only the papillae associated with palatally overlapped
incisors were shorter after treatment.
KANDASAMY ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 20
(4a)
(4b)
Figure 4. Imbricated tooth, tooth 21 overlapped labially by tooth 11.
Pretreatment (a) and post-treatment (b) views.
(5a)
(5b)
Figure 5. Imbricated tooth, tooth 21 overlapped palatally by tooth 22.
Pretreatment (a) and post treatment (b) views.
In a study such as this there are some limitations that
should be considered. We used intra-oral photo-
graphs to measure the lengths of structures that were
not always viewed directly, the depth of the gingival
crevice was not probed and standardised periapical
radiographs were not available. Had the latter been
available we could have measured the distance
between the cemento-enamel junction and the gingi-
val margin and obtained information on the height of
the interproximal bone. A further limitation in our
study is that it only covers 18 months (the period
covered by treatment) and, as a result, the changes we
observed may not be maintained in a longer study.
Furthermore, gingival attachments change over time
and during adolescence marked changes can occur in
some individuals. Age changes in the interdental
papillae could have been masked or enhanced by the
type of tooth movement, particularly if the teeth on
either side of an interdental papilla were intruded or
extruded. This is a potential confounding variable
that was not assessed. It was mainly because of these
limitations that we used proportional changes.
Although our control group was made up of patients
that did not require alignment of the anterior teeth
some unintentional tooth movement may have
occurred. The possibility of this happening and pos-
sibility of confounding changes in the control group
also must be acknowledged.
The pretreatment heights of interdental papillae were
significantly shorter in groups with a vertical discrep-
ancy, labially overlapped and labially placed incisors.
The heights of the interdental papillae increased sig-
nificantly when a vertical discrepancy was corrected.
CHANGES IN INTERDENTAL PAPILLAE HEIGHTS FOLLOWING ALIGNMENT OF ANTERIOR TEETH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 21
(6a)
(6b)
Figure 6. Labially placed tooth, tooth 12 is labially placed. Pretreatment (a)
and post-treatment (b) views.
(7a)
(7b)
Figure 7. Palatally placed tooth, tooth 22 is palatally placed. Pretreatment
(a) and post treatment (b) views.
During leveling one tooth may have been intruded
and the adjacent tooth extruded. This is a potential
confounding variable that was not assessed in this
study. Following extrusion the height of the alveolar
bone usually increases and there is a proportional
increase in the attachment of the supra-alveolar
connective tissues.
15
Whether the papilla between
overlapped teeth increased or reduced in height
during treatment was determined by the direction of
tooth movement: a papilla shortened if the over-
lapped tooth was moved labially, and increased
in height if the overlapped tooth was moved palat-
ally. Similar findings occurred when labially or
palatally placed teeth that were not overlapped were
repositioned.
Labial movement of palatally placed or imbricated
teeth may result in a number of unfavourable bone
and soft tissue changes considered to predispose gin-
gival recession following orthodontic treatment, such
as a reduced height and thickness of the free gingivae
and an increased clinical crown.
10,16
Gingival reces-
sion associated with labial tooth movement correlates
with our findings of interdental recession. In com-
parison with marginal gingival recession, interdental
recession can result in the characteristic open gingival
space or dark triangle, particularly between incisors.
Gingival recession is likely to be precipitated, firstly,
by inflammation induced by bacterial plaque and,
secondly, by trauma from tooth brushing.
9,16
Therefore, patients undergoing labial movement of
palatally placed teeth should be warned of the likeli-
hood of dark triangles and should use effective and
non-traumatic plaque control measures.
14,17
Palatal tooth movement, on the other hand, results
in an increased labio-palatal thickness of the tissue at
the labial aspect of the tooth. This often results in a
reduced clinical crown and coronal migration of the
soft tissue margin, which may require periodontal
treatment.
Open gingival embrasures frequently follow align-
ment of crowded maxillary incisors and, as we have
shown, closure of a diastema.
1
These findings disagree
with Kurth et al.
15
who could not demonstrate any
post-treatment difference in the form of the embra-
sures in patients with rotated or overlapped maxillary
central incisors before treatment. It has been reported
that following orthodontic treatment open gingival
embrasures are more likely to be found in patients
over 20 years of age than in younger patients.
7,8
In
the present study the patients were between 13 and
16 years of age so it would be reasonable to expect
greater changes in an older group of patients.
Periodontal assessment and warning of the likelihood
of dark triangles is a sensible precaution for patients
who present with diastemata, palatally overlapped and
palatally placed incisors in the permanent dentition.
Adult patients appear to be particularly prone to
develop dark triangles, but other factors such as the
form of the crowns, the position of the contact area and
the height of the interproximal bone may also influ-
ence the position of the interdental papilla.
7,8,12,13,18
It may be possible to minimise complications by
adopting procedures to locate the contact point
further apically, place bonded restorations inter-
proximally and/or by augmenting the gingival
tissues.
12,13
In the developing dentition, treatment strategies
should be aimed at establishing favourable contact
point relationships. Strategies such as early extraction
of deciduous canines, reducing the interproximal sur-
faces of deciduous teeth, and/or arch expansion may
allow early alignment of the permanent incisors and
prevent unfavourable contact point relationships
from developing later in life.
19
If teeth are moved
beyond the biological limits of the alveolar bone it
may be advantageous to allow the interdental papillae
to reach their adult sizes before undertaking ortho-
dontic tooth movement likely to reduce the heights of
the interdental papillae.
Conclusions
The results of this study indicate that the interdental
papillae between the anterior teeth may lengthen
following palatal movement of labially displaced or
imbricated teeth and the intrusion of one tooth rela-
tive to another. In these cases dark triangles are less
likely to develop. On the other hand, the heights of
the interdental papillae are likely to reduce following
labial movement of imbricated or palatally placed
incisors and closure of a diastema and, as a result,
dark triangles may develop. Clinicians should be alert
to the possibility of dark triangles developing in the
latter group, particularly in older patients.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by The University of
Western Australia Orthodontic Research Fund.
KANDASAMY ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 22
CHANGES IN INTERDENTAL PAPILLAE HEIGHTS FOLLOWING ALIGNMENT OF ANTERIOR TEETH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 23
Corresponding author
Associate Professor Mithran Goonewardene
Program Director, Orthodontics
Dental School
The University of Western Australia
17 Monash Avenue
Nedlands WA 6009
Australia
Tel: (+61 8) 9346 7470
Fax: (+61 8) 9346 7666
Email: mithran.goonewardene@uwa.edu.au
References
1. Burke S, Burch JG, Tetz JA. Incidence and size of pretreat-
ment overlap and posttreatment gingival embrasure space
between maxillary central incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1994;105:50611.
2. Atherton JD. The gingival response to orthodontic tooth
movement. Am J Orthod 1970;58:17986.
3. Atherton JD, Kerr NW. Effect of orthodontic tooth move-
ment upon the gingivae. An investigation. Brit Dent J 1968;
124:55560.
4. Diedrich PR. Orthodontic procedures improving perio-
dontal prognosis. Dent Clin North Am 1996;40:87587.
5. Waerhaug J. Eruption of teeth into crowded position, loss of
attachment, and downgrowth of subgingival plaque. Am J
Orthod 1980;78:4539.
6. El-Mangoury NH, Gaafar SM, Mostafa YA. Mandibular
anterior crowding and periodontal disease. Angle Orthod
1987;57:338.
7. Ainamo J, Paloheimo L, Norblad A, Murtomaa H. Gingival
recession in school children at 7, 12 and 17 years of age in
Espoo, Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:
2836.
8. Ko-Kimura N, Kimura-Hayashi M, Yamaguchi M, Ikeda T,
Meguro D, Kanekawa M, Kasai K. Some factors associated
with open gingival embrasures following orthodontic treat-
ment. Aust Orthod J 2003;19:1924.
9. Ikeda T, Yamaguchi M, Meguro D, Kasai K. Prediction and
causes of open gingival embrasure spaces between the
mandibular central incisors following orthodontic treat-
ment. Aust Orthod J 2004;20:8792.
10. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic
treatment. Semin Orthod 1996;2:4654.
11. Andlin-Sobocki A, Bodin L. Dimensional alterations of the
gingiva related to changes of facial/lingual tooth position in
permanent anterior teeth of children. A 2-year longitudinal
study. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:21924.
12. Zachrisson BU. Orthodontics and Periodontics. In: Lindhe
J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical Periodontology and
Implant Dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1998:
74193.
13. Zachrisson BU. Interdental papilla reconstruction in adult
orthodontics. World J Orthod 2004;5:6773.
14. Wennstrom JL. The significance of the width and thickness
of the gingiva in orthodontic treatment. Dtsche Zahnarztl Z
1990;45:13641.
15. Maynard JG, Ochsenbein C. Mucogingival problems, preva-
lence and therapy in children. J Periodontol 1975;46:
54352.
16. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Recession in sites with inadequate
width of the keratinized gingiva: an experimental study in
the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:95103.
17. Kurth JR, Kokich VG. Open gingival embrasures after
orthodontic treatment in adults: prevalence and etiology.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:11623.
18. Lindhe J. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd ed.
Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1997.
19. Rosa M, Cozzani M, Cozzani G. Sequential slicing of lower
deciduous teeth to resolve incisor crowding. J Clin Orthod
1994;28,5969.
Introduction
Two of the main objectives of orthodontic treatment
are the correction of irregularity and malocclusion of
the teeth. Following treatment, some conditions such
as imbricated, rotated, spaced and flared teeth show a
strong tendency to return to the original condition
following removal of the appliances. This process is
termed relapse or physiological recovery.
1
Preventing
relapse can be a long-term and difficult process
because many orthodontic results are potentially
unstable.
25
While the profession may acknowledge
that some relapse is inevitable, patients are under-
standably disappointed if some of the original condi-
tion returns after treatment.
2
The desire to retain the
results of treatment has lead to the development of
long-term or so-called permanent retainers, and pro-
cedures that appear to reduce the tendency of some
conditions to relapse.
67
Fixed retainers are preferable
to removable retainers because patients compliance
with wearing removable retainers is usually unreliable.
8
Long-term retention is more commonly employed in
the anterior region, and it is usually achieved by
bonding a fine wire to the lingual/palatal surfaces of
the anterior teeth. Bonded lingual or palatal retainers
were promoted as invisible retainers in the late
1970s.
9
They have steadily gained in popularity
because they are effective at preventing relapse of the
anterior teeth and patient involvement is minimal.
10
Because of the convenience of this form of retention,
they are preferred by many patients and parents.
However, there is little information on how reliable
these retainers are and how effective they are at pre-
venting relapse.
11
The aims of this retrospective study
were to investigate the reliability of fixed lingual
retainers made from looped round wires, and the
factors that may have contributed to their failure.
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 24
The reliability of bonded lingual retainers
Robert Cerny
Specialist practice, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Background: Bonded lingual retainers have become increasingly popular, but there is little information on their long-term
reliability.
Objectives: The aims of this retrospective study were to investigate the reliability of bonded upper and lower lingual retainers
and the factors contributing to their failure.
Methods: The study group were 149 patients who returned between 2002 and 2005 with failed upper and/or lower fixed
lingual retainers. Approximately 230 patients were debonded each year and approximately 1150 patients were covered
annually by a 5-year guarantee of replacement or repair of failed retainers. The retainers were made from 0.018 inch round
stainless steel heat-treated orthodontic wire. The upper retainers had loops opposite the embrasures and the lower retainers had
loops between the lateral incisors and canines. The following details were recorded: teeth involved, patient gender, the likely
cause of any damage and the time taken for each repair.
Results: Between 35 and 40 patients required repair/replacement of their retainers each year. Multiple bond failures occurred
in approximately 9 per cent of these patients. Male patients had twice the fracture rate of female patients. Extra-oral trauma
was the most frequent cause of failure followed by intra-oral trauma, operator error and wire fracture. The central incisors in
both arches were the most frequent sites of failure. Single tooth repairs required approximately 12 minutes of the orthodontists
chair-side time.
Conclusions: Bonded lingual retainers are a reliable form of retention after orthodontic treatment.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 2429)
Received for publication: January 2006
Accepted: January 2007
Materials and methods
The subjects were 149 patients who returned with
failed upper and/or lower fixed retainers over a four
year period between 1 January 2002 and 31 December
2005. Of the 149 patients who returned for repairs
and/or replacement of a retainer(s), 76 were male
patients and 73 were female patients.
All patients were treated and reviewed by the same
orthodontist working in the same specialist practice.
At the conclusion of their active treatment with fixed
appliances, all patients were fitted with fixed looped
wire retainers bonded to the lingual surfaces of the
upper and lower anterior teeth. Actual figures for the
number of patients debonded were not available and
have been conservatively estimated from the approx-
imate number of patients debonded each working
week. This estimate was based on the orthodontist
working 46 weeks each year and debonding five
patients, that is, 10 dental arches each week. The
annual number of patients debonded was approx-
imately 230. Since 1990 each patient has been given
a written guarantee by the orthodontist that he would
undertake replacement or repair without cost to the
patient if a retainer was dislodged or fractured within
five years of the initial fitting of the retainers. Patients
also agreed to wear a mouthguard during contact
sports, not to use their teeth recklessly or inappro-
priately and to attend all orthodontic and dental
appointments. In each year of the study 1150 patients
were covered for repairs. Approximately twice as
many female to male patients were treated in this
practice. During the study no patient or parent
requested the removal of a fixed retainer.
The designs of the retainers used in this study are
shown in Figure 1. All retainers were made from
0.018 inch round single strand orthodontic wire
(Regular Plus, AJ Wilcock, Whittlesea, Victoria,
Australia) and bonded to the lingual or palatal sur-
faces of the anterior teeth with composite resin. A
direct bonding technique was used in all cases. The
same bonding primer (OrthoSolo universal bonding
primer, SDS Ormco, Glendora, Calif., USA) and
composite resin (Z100, 3M ESPE St. Paul, Minn.,
USA) were used on all patients. The upper retainers
had loops opposite the embrasures to provide stress
breaking and flexibility and to allow access to the
interproximal areas for brushing, flossing and place-
ment of dental restorations. All lower retainers had
loops between the lateral incisors and canines for the
same reasons. Loops were not placed between the lower
incisors because they are uncomfortable in these sites
and make tooth cleaning difficult. Wherever possible,
the wire was covered by at least one millimetre of
composite, as recommended by Bearn et al.
12
The following data were recorded for the patients
who attended for repairs/replacement of their retain-
ers: personal details, the retainer (upper/lower)
involved, teeth involved, nature of the damage (e.g.
fractured composite, delamination, wire fracture), the
gender of the patient, the likely cause of any damage,
and the time taken for each repair.
Results
The results are given in Tables IIII. In the first
year of the study 35 patients (21 male, 14 female)
attended for repairs or replacement and 13 of these
RELIABILITY OF BONDED LINGUAL RETAINERS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 25
Figure 1. Lingual retainers bonded to the anterior teeth in the upper (left) and lower (right) arches.
patients (9 males, 4 females) attended more than once
for repair/replacement of a retainer. The total number
of bonds and/or wire breakages in 2002 was 52. The
figures in the following years were remarkably similar
with small fluctuations in the number of males and
females and number of patients with multiple break-
ages (Table I). On average, seven retainers each year
had fractured wires. As twice the number of females
to males were treated each year male patients
damaged/dislodged their fixed retainers twice as often
as female patients.
Over the four year period covered by the study the
fracture/dislodgments were attributed to extra-oral
trauma (43 per cent), intra-oral trauma (26 per cent),
operator error (18 per cent) and wire fracture (13 per
cent). A blow to the face playing sport, as a result of
fighting or an accident was considered extra-oral
trauma. Intra-oral trauma was loss or failure of a
retainer during biting or using the teeth for a task
other than eating or speaking (Table II). Bond failure
at the composite enamel interface was considered to
be due to contamination during bonding and has
been called operator error (Figure 2).
The most common sites of fracture were the lower
central incisors (29 per cent), upper central incisors
(26 per cent) and upper lateral incisors (21 per cent)
(Table III). Repairs to upper retainers were twice as
common as repairs to lower retainers. The average
clinical time taken to repair a single unit bond failure
was 12 minutes.
The retainers were effective at maintaining anterior
alignment providing they remained attached. When
breakages occurred, it was not uncommon to see dis-
placement of the tooth detached from the retainer
within a few days. Patients without exception
remarked that their retainers were comfortable with-
in one to two weeks of placement, and were rarely
CERNY
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 26
Table I. The number of patients experiencing breakages.
Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 Mean
Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent
35 3.00 38 3.00 36 3.10 40 3.50 37 3.20
Repairs Male 21 1.80 16 1.40 17 1.47 22 1.90 19 1.60
Female 14 1.20 22 1.60 19 1.65 18 1.80 18 1.60
Total number of
unit bond and
wire breakages 52 0.38 50 0.36 56 0.40 53 0.38 53 0.38
Number of patients
with multiple bond
breakages 13 1.10 10 0.87 14 1.20 10 0.87 12 1.00
Multiple Male 9 0.78 3 0.26 6 0.50 4 0.35 6 0.50
repairs Female 4 0.35 7 0.00 8 0.70 6 0.52 6 0.50
Note. In each year 1150 patients were covered by the 5-year guarantee
Figure 2. Failure due to fracture at the enamel composite interface.
RELIABILITY OF BONDED LINGUAL RETAINERS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 27
difficult to clean. Over the period covered by this
study there were no cases of caries or periodontal dis-
ease due to the presence of the retainers. In some
patients, there was a noticeable increase in supra-
gingival calculus around lower retainers.
Discussion
In this study, the reliability of fixed lingual retainers
made from looped round wires and the factors that
contributed to their failure were investigated. Out of
an annual total of approximately 1150 patients with
2300 upper and lower retainers covered by a guar-
antee, approximately 40 patients returned annually
for repairs or replacements to one or both retainers.
Of these patients 9 per cent returned for repairs on
more than one occasion each year. As twice the num-
ber of female patients to male patients were treated
male patients had twice the fracture rate of the female
patients. Extra-oral trauma was the most common
reason for failure, and failures most frequently
occurred at the central incisor regions in both dental
arches.
The number of patients who required repairs was
static each year and kept pace with the running sum
of retainers in place and under guarantee. In each year
of the study less than 4 per cent of the 1150 patients
covered by the guarantee returned for repair or
replacement of a retainer(s). This group of patients
had a combined total of 13800 unit bonds (1150
patients x 2 fixed retainers each x 6 unit bonds per
retainer) in place. The number of unit bonds that
needed to be repaired each year over the first 5 years
after their placement was 0.43 per cent of all unit
bonds involved.
This finding compares well with other dental treat-
ments involving restorative materials and appliances.
Hickel and Manhart
13
found dental restorations in
posterior teeth had an annual failure rate of up to 7
per cent for amalgams, 9 per cent for direct compos-
ites, 11.8 per cent for composite inlays and 5.9 per
Table II. The causes of failure and/or breakage.
Cause of fracture(s) 2002 2003 2004 2005 Mean
Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent
a. Trauma extra-oral 33 63 20 40 14 25 23 43 23 43
b. Trauma intra-oral 9 17 18 37 18 32 11 20 14 26
c. Operator fitting 9 18 8 16 11 20 9 18 9 18
d. Wire fracture 1 2 4 7 13 23 10 20 7 13
Totals 52 100 50 100 56 100 53 100 53 100
Table III. The sites of failure and/or fracture.
2002 2003 2004 2005 Mean
Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent
Maxillary anterior
teeth 1 7 13 18 36 13 23 12 23 14 26
2 15 28 9 18 15 26 8 14 11 21
3 6 12 7 14 10 18 6 12 8 14
Mandibular
anterior teeth 1 18 35 10 20 13 23 21 39 15 29
2 2 4 2 4 1 2 4 8 2 4
3 4 8 4 8 4 7 2 4 3 6
Note. In each year 1150 patients were covered by the 5-year guarantee
CERNY
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 28
cent for cast gold inlays and onlays. A 1990 study of
survival rates of implants by Adell et al. reported a
failure rate of approximately 5.5 per cent over 5 years
and 10.2 per cent over 10 years.
14
Bonded brackets
had a failure rate of around 5 per cent per annum
between 1986 and 2002.
15
The 0.018 inch round stainless steel Regular Plus
wire used in the retainers was adapted to the anterior
teeth and interproximal loops were used in the upper
arch in between the lower lateral incisors and canines.
Of the approximately 460 retainers placed each year
the wire frames in seven retainers fractured giving an
annual wire fracture rate of less than 2 per cent. Dahl
and Zachrisson who used five-strand 0.0215 inch
Twistiflex wire reported an annual failure rate of 1.1
per cent in their study of 2.5 years.
16
Rogers and
Andrews, who used round 0.025 inch stainless steel
wire bonded to the lower canines only, had an annu-
al bond fracture rate of 0.014 per cent per annum
over three years.
17
As more than 30 per cent of
the wire fractures and/or bond failures occurred in
the lower incisor region in the present study, the
reliability of the lower retainers would have been
improved markedly if the lower incisors had not been
bonded. However, if these teeth are not bonded any
relapse is visible and distressing to the patient. Rose et
al. who used polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin
composite fixed retainers had a failure rate of 50 per
cent over 24 months.
18
The 3MZ100 Universal Composite paste was chosen
because it is claimed to have favourable strength, attri-
tion resistance, durable smoothness, ease of handling
and universal colour matching.
19
Wherever possible,
the wire was covered by at least one millimetre of
composite for optimum strength and patient comfort
as recommended by Bearn et al.
12
In the present study,
the fracture rate of this material was 0.26 per cent per
annum. The composite and bonding agent combine to
produce a fracture rate of 46 per annum from 13800
unit bonds which is 0.33 per cent per annum over the
first five years of fitting the fixed lingual retainers.
The fixed lingual retainers in the present study
were effective at maintaining the alignment of the
teeth they were attached to. When a wire fractured or a
bond failed the patients usually became aware of this
by movement of the teeth involved. Repairs of
fractures were generally straight-forward and
required, on average, 12 minutes per tooth bonded.
This amounted to 15 minutes each week of the
orthodontists clinical time.
Conclusions
1. Bonded lingual retainers are a reliable form of
retention after orthodontic treatment.
2. Male patients were more likely to have breakages
than female patients.
3. Measures to protect the teeth from trauma, both
extra-oral and intra-oral, may prevent some retainers
from becoming dislodged or fractured.
4. Fewer breakages may be experienced if the incisors
are not bonded, but it is not always possible to omit
the incisors from the retainer.
5. Repairs to fractured retainers required approxi-
mately 15 minutes of chairside time per week.
Corresponding author
Dr Robert Cerny
1st Floor
139 Scott Street
Newcastle NSW 2300
Australia
Tel: (+61 2) 4929 5885
Fax: (+61 2) 4926 4221
Email: rcerny@bigpond.net.au
References
1. Horowitz SL, Hixon EH. Physiologic recovery following
orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1969;55:14.
2. Graber TM. Orthodontics Principles and practice. 3rd
edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1972:597608.
3. Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the teeth. Angles
system. 7th edn. Philadelphia: White, 1907:263304.
4. Little RM. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior
alignment. University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod
1999;5:191204.
5. Sheridan JJ. The readers corner. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:
315.
6. Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower
retention, nine years in retrospect: Part I. Angle Orthod
1980;50:8897.
7. Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower
retention, nine years in retrospect: Part II. Angle Orthod
1980;50:16978.
8. Wong P, Freer TJ. Patients attitudes toward compliance
with retainer wear. Aust Orthod J 2005;21:4553.
9. Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded
orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 1977;71:4408.
10. Wong PM, Freer TJ. A comprehensive survey of retention
procedures in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Orthod J
2004;20:99106.
RELIABILITY OF BONDED LINGUAL RETAINERS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 29
11. Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR,
Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth
position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2004;CD002283.
12. Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded ortho-
dontic retainers: The wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:6774.
13. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior
teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhesive Dent 2001;3:
4564.
14. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T.
Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in
the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:34759.
15. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 2002 JCO
study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures.
Part 1: Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:55368.
16. Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-
bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:61930.
17. Rogers MB, Andrews LJ. Dependable technique for bonding
a 3x3 retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:
2313.
18. Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Clinical comparison of a multi-
stranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-rein-
forced resin composite used for lingual retention.
Quintessence Int 2002;33:57983.
19. Neme A. 7-year clinical performance of 3M Z100
restorative. Dental Advisor 2000;17:12.
Introduction
Since the introduction of cephalometric radiography
by Broadbent in 1931 the centre of sella turcica has
been used in many cephalometric analyses.
1
This
point is relatively stable because the morphology of
sella turcica does not change significantly after 12
years of age.
2
On lateral radiographs the sella turcica
or pituitary fossa is the radiodense saddle-shaped
outline of the fossa extending between the anterior
and posterior clinoid processes. A sella turcica bridge
is the bony union that occasionally occurs between
the processes. In healthy individuals the surface area
of the sella turcica varies from 18 mm
2
to 115 mm
2
in females and from 22 mm
2
to 122 mm
2
in males.
3
The shape of sella turcica is usually oval, but round
and flat types can also occur.
4
Orthodontists should be familiar with variations in
the anatomical structures found on cephalometric
films so as to exclude any pathological changes.
The pituitary gland occupies the sella turcica and it is
considered to be a site for brain tumours.
57
Two
cases with Riegers syndrome were reported by
Koshino et al.,
8
the sellas in both cases were charac-
terised by prominent posterior clinoid processes:
the so-called J-shaped sella turcica.
9
Sellas of
unusual size, shape and/or with a poorly defined
outline may indicate pituitary problems and may
be associated with some types of craniofacial mal-
formation.
7,10
The prevalence of sella bridges determined by direct
inspection ranges from 1.54 per cent to 6 per
cent
11,12
and from 3.85 per cent to 18.6 per cent
when radiographs are used.
1315
The difference has
been attributed to superimposition of overlapping
clinoid processes. Sella bridges have been classified
radiographically into two types: Type A is a ribbon-
like extension linking the anterior and posterior
clinoid processes, and Type B is the bony extension(s)
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 30
Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and
orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective
cephalometric study
Hussam M. Abdel-Kader
Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of sella turcica bridges in patients accepted for conventional orthodontic treatment and
orthognathic surgery.
Methods: The pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 635 subjects scheduled for orthodontic treatment and 113 subjects
scheduled for orthognathic surgery were used. The number of subjects with complete sella bridges and the type of discrepancy
(Angle Class I, II, or III malocclusions, skeletal Class 2, 3 or bimaxillary protrusion) were recorded.
Results: Sella turcica bridges were found in 3.74 per cent of the total sample of 748 subjects. In the orthodontic group 3.21,
2.97 and 7.14 per cent of subjects in the Class I, II and III subgroups respectively had sella bridges. In the orthognathic
surgery group 2.86 and 10.71 per cent of the subjects in the Skeletal 2 and 3 subgroups respectively had sella bridges.
No subjects in the bimaxillary subgroup had sella bridges. In the orthodontic group 2.20 per cent of the female subjects and
1.10 per cent of the male subjects had sella bridges, while in the orthognathic surgery group 1.77 of the females and 4.42
per cent of the males had sella bridges.
Conclusions: Higher percentages of sella turcica bridges were found in subjects with Angle Class III and skeletal 3
discrepancies compared with subjects with Angle Class I, II, skeletal 2 or bimaxillary protrusion discrepancies.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 3035)
Received for publication: June 2006
Accepted: January 2007
SELLA TURCICA BRIDGES IN ORTHODONTIC AND ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY PATIENTS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 31
of the anterior and/or the posterior clinoid processes
bridging the pituitary fossa.
14
Higher prevalences of
sella bridges have been reported in patients with
severe craniofacial deformities and with increased
mandibular and maxillary overjets.
14
The prevalence of sella bridges in orthodontic
patients has been reported to be approximately half
that in orthognathic surgery patients.
15
The present study investigates the prevalence of sella
turcica bridges in subjects accepted for orthodontic
treatment and orthognathic surgery. The underlying
assumptions are that the former had malocclusions
that could be treated with conventional orthodontic
treatment, that the latter had severe skeletal mal-
occlusions necessitating orthognathic surgery, and
that the initial treatment recommendations were not
changed.
Materials and methods
The pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 748
patients entitled to receive orthognathic and/or
orthodontic treatment in the Orthodontic Clinic, Al-
Fanateer Hospital, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between
2000 and 2004 were used. All patients were of Saudi
nationality with no history of systemic diseases, with
no craniofacial deformities such as cleft lip and
palate, or receiving long-term medical treatment. The
lateral cephalograms were taken by the same X-ray
technician and machine and processed in an auto-
matic developer using a standardised method. Only
good quality cephalograms with clear outlines of sella
turcica were selected. The cephalograms were
examined by the author in a darkroom, using an
X-ray viewer and magnifying lens, and the number of
cephalograms with complete sella turcica bridges
recorded.
Of the 748 pretreatment lateral cephalograms that
met the criteria, 635 were of patients scheduled for
orthodontic treatment of Angles Class I, II or III
dental malocclusions (Orthodontic group). There
were 445 females and 190 males in this group and
they were between 14 and 17 years of age. The
remainder comprised an older group of 113 patients
(42 females, 71 males) between 18 and 24 years
of age with severe maxillomandibular skeletal discrep-
ancies recommended for orthognathic surgery
(Orthognathic group). The latter malocclusions were
classified into skeletal Class 2, skeletal Class 3 and
skeletal bimaxillary protrusion.
Results
Details of the subjects are given in Table I. In the
orthodontic group, 405 subjects had Class I mal-
occlusions, 202 subjects had Class II malocclusions
and 28 subjects had Class III malocclusions. In the
orthognathic group, 35 subjects had skeletal Class
2 discrepancies, 56 subjects had skeletal Class 3 dis-
crepancies and 22 had skeletal bimaxillary protrusion.
Examples of the different types of sella turcica and
sella turcica bridges are shown in Figures 1 and 2. An
example of extreme variation in sella bridging and
sella turcica outline is shown in Figure 3. This 17
year-old male subject had an Angles Class II dental
malocclusion.
Sella bridges were found in 21 subjects in the ortho-
dontic group and in 7 subjects in the orthognathic
group (Table II). In the orthodontic group 14 female
subjects (2.20 per cent) and seven male subjects (1.10
per cent) had complete sella bridges. In the orthog-
nathic group two female subjects (1.77 per cent) and
five male subjects (4.42 per cent) had sella bridges.
Higher percentages of sella bridges were found in
the Angles Class III and skeletal Class 3 subgroups
than in the other malocclusion subgroups. No sella
bridges were found in the 22 subjects with skeletal
bimaxillary protrusion.
Discussion
The present study was designed to compare the num-
ber of complete sella turcica bridges in subjects sched-
uled for orthodontic treatment with the number of
complete sella bridges in subjects scheduled for
orthognathic surgery. Subjects in the orthodontic
group had Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions that
could be treated with conventional orthodontic
appliances while subjects in the orthognathic group
Table I. Number of subjects in the malocclusion subgroups.
Orthodontic group Orthognathic group
Class Class Class Class Class Bi-
I II III 2 3 maxillary
protrusion
Females 293 139 13 12 17 13
Males 112 63 15 23 39 9
Total 405 202 28 35 56 22
ABDEL- KADER
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 32
(a)
(b)
(d)
(e)
(c) (f )
Figure 1. Six examples of normal sella outlines found in the subjects.
had severe skeletal 2, 3 and bimaxillary malocclusions
requiring surgical correction. All subjects were in
good general health at the time of examination, had
no craniofacial malformations or previous systemic
illnesses. Previous studies have reported an increased
prevalence of sella bridges in subjects with severe
craniofacial disorders.
14,15
The subjects in both
groups fell within the range (14 to 24 years of age)
when the outline of sella turcica is considered to be
relatively stable.
2
The finding of 3.31 per cent sella bridging in the
orthodontic group is less than the 7.3 per cent
reported by Jones et al. in their orthodontic treatment
group.
15
We recorded the type of malocclusion and
found that a higher prevalence (7.14 per cent) of sella
bridges in the 28 Class III subjects than in the 607
Class I and II subjects. Jones et al. did not mention
malocclusions of their patients. The prevalence of
sella bridges in the orthognathic surgery group in the
present study (6.19 per cent) was also much less than
the 16.7 per cent reported by Jones and coworkers.
15
Some of this disagreement may be due to the com-
position of the samples: Jones et al. used patients
treated at a university clinic in Scotland while the
subjects in the present study were Saudi nationals.
The type of malocclusion appears to play an
important part in the prevalence of sella bridges. In
agreement with Becktor et al.
14
we found higher per-
centages of sella bridges in the Angle Class III and
skeletal Class 3 subgroups. The finding of sella
bridging in 9.52 per cent of the subjects in these sub-
groups is slightly less than the approximately 12 per
cent reported by Becktor et al. in their group with
mandibular overjet.
14
In a total sample of 177
orthognathic surgery patients Becktor et al found 21
subjects with Types A and B sella bridges. Smaller
SELLA TURCICA BRIDGES IN ORTHODONTIC AND ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY PATIENTS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 33
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. Four examples of sella bridges.
(c)
(d)
percentages of subjects with sella bridges were found
in the Angles Class I and II subgroups in the ortho-
subgroups in the orthognathic group.
The higher prevalence of sella bridging in radio-
graphic studies has been attributed to super-
processes. Autopsy studies have reported lower rates
of sella bridging (between 1.75 and 6 per cent) com-
pared with the higher rates found in radiographic
studies.
11,12
Although the differences have been
attributed to superimposition of the clinoid processes
other factors such as the composition of the samples
may account for some of the differences.
Conclusions
The pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 635 sub-
jects scheduled for orthodontic treatment and 113
subjects scheduled for orthognathic surgery were
examined for complete sella turcica bridges. The
types of dental/skeletal discrepancy in both groups
were recorded.
Higher percentages of sella turcica bridges were found
in the orthodontic subjects with Angle Class III mal-
occlusion compared with the subjects with Angle
Class I and II malocclusions, and in the orthog-
nathic surgery subjects with skeletal 3 discrepancy
compared with the subjects with skeletal 2 and
bimaxillary protrusion discrepancies.
Corresponding author
Prof. Hussam M. Abdel-Kader
5 Gamat AlDowal AlArbia Street
AlMohandessen 12411
Giza, Cairo
Egypt
Tel: (+20 2) 305 0468
Email: hmkader@hotmail.com
References
1. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to
orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:4566.
2. Melsen B. The cranial base. Acta Odontol Scand 1974;62:
112.
3. Abdel-Kader HM. Adolescent growth assessment (AGA):
Problems and approach. AlAzhar J Dent Sc 2000;3:93100.
4. Teal JS. Radiology of the adult sella turcica. Bull Los
Angeles Neurol Soc 1977;42:11174.
5. Abdel-Kader HM. Screening of cephalometric and panoram-
ic radiographs for significant pathological findings. AlAzhar
J Dent Sc 1998;1:1239.
6. El Gammal T, Allen MB. Further consideration of sella
changes associated with increased intracranial pressure. Br J
Radiol 1972;45:5619.
7. Weisberg LA. Asymptomatic enlargement of the sella tur-
cica. Arch Neurol 1975;32:4835.
ABDEL- KADER
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 34
Table II. Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.
Orthodontic group Orthognathic group
(N=635) (N=113)
Class I Class II Class III Total Class 2 Class 3 Bimaxillary Total
Females 293 139 13 445 12 17 13 42
Sella bridges 9 4 1 14 0 2 0 2
Male 112 63 15 190 23 39 9 71
Sella bridges 4 2 1 7 1 4 0 5
Total 405 202 28 635 35 56 22 113
Number with sella bridges
(Per cent) 13 (3.21) 6 (2.97) 2 (7.14) 21 (4.83) 1 (2.86) 6 (10.71) 0 (0) 7 (6.19)
Figure 3. Abnormal shape, size and sella outline found in 17 year-old male
subject with an Angles Class II malocclusion.
imposition of the anterior and posterior clinoid
dontic group and in the skeletal 2 and bimaxillary
SELLA TURCICA BRIDGES IN ORTHODONTIC AND ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY PATIENTS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 35
8. Koshino T, Konno T, Ohzeki T. Bone and joint manifesta-
tions in Riegers syndrome: a report of a family. J Pediatr
Orthop 1989;9:22430.
9. Kuhlberg AJ, Norton LA. Finding pathology on cephalo-
metric radiographs. In Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic ceph-
alometry. United Kingdom: Mosby-Wolfe, 1995. 17580.
10. Kjaer I, Fischer-Hansen B. Human fetal pituitary gland in
holoprosencephaly and anencephaly. J Craniofac Genet Dev
Biol 1995;15:2229.
11. Busch W. Die Morphologie der Sella Turcica und ihre
Bezeihung zur Hypophyse. [Morphology of sella turcica and
its relation to the pituitary gland]. Virchows Arch 1951;320:
43758.
12. Bergland RM, Ray BS, Torack RM. Anatomical variations in
the pituitary gland and adjacent structures in 225 human
autopsy cases. J Neurosurg 1968;28:939.
13. Muller F. Die Bedeutung der Sellabruecke fur das Auge.
[Sella turcica bridge and its importance for the eye]. Klin
Monatsbl Augenheilked 1952;120:298302.
14. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in sub-
jects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod
2000;22: 6974.
15. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, Moos KF, McHugh S.
Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated
by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle
Orthod 2005;75:7148.
Introduction
Fixed appliance therapy using the pre-adjusted ortho-
dontic bracket system requires brackets to slide in
relation to the archwire. When sliding mechanics are
used, frictional resistance occurs at the bracket-wire
interface such that some of the applied force is dissi-
pated in overcoming friction and the remainder is
transferred to the tooth and its supporting structures
to mediate movement.
13
Frictional resistance is the result of a combination of
true friction, bracket binding and archwire notching.
Bracket binding occurs as a bracket tips in relation to
the archwire such that opposing corners of the brack-
et come into contact with the wire. The amount that
a bracket can tip before binding begins to occur is
termed the critical angle and varies according to
bracket slot and archwire dimensions.
4,5
As tipping
begins to exceed the critical angle, the edges of the
slot can cause notching of the wire, which further
increases resistance to sliding.
6
Tooth movement is dependent upon not just the
force system, but also biological factors, including
cellular turnover, vascularity and bone density. This
produces cyclical waves of remodelling events rather
than linear phenomena.
7
Intra-orally, bracket binding
can be influenced by factors such as masticatory
forces which flex the wire and in turn may disrupt the
binding effect.
8
Although laboratory testing is unable
to reproduce these biological and masticatory effects,
it is considered valuable because of its more con-
trolled environment and ability to limit variables.
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 36
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline
ceramic brackets with conventional slots,
glazed slots and metal slot inserts
Steven P. Jones
*
and K. Gyaami Amoah
UCL Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, England
*
and University of Ghana Dental School, Accra, Ghana
Aims: To compare the static frictional resistance of ceramic brackets with a conventional slot (Allure), a glazed slot (Mystique)
and a metal slot insert (Clarity).
Method: Twenty five brackets of each type, with slot size 0.022 x 0.028 inch and Roth prescription were tested by sliding
against straight lengths of 0.019 x 0.025 inch rectangular stainless steel wire. During the tests the brackets and wire were
lubricated with artificial saliva. Static frictional forces at three different simulated binding angulations (0, 5 and 10 degrees)
were measured for each type of bracket.
Results: At each of the angulations tested, the Clarity brackets produced the lowest static frictional resistance. At 0 degree
angulation (below the critical angle for binding) the Allure brackets produced the greatest friction. The difference in friction
between the Clarity and Mystique brackets was not statistically significant. As the angulations were increased to 5 degrees
the Allure brackets again produced the greatest frictional resistance, although this was not significantly higher than the Mystique
brackets. The Mystique brackets produced the greatest frictional resistance at 10 degrees, but again there was no statistical
difference from the Allure brackets.
Conclusions: A glazed slot ceramic bracket demonstrates low frictional resistance at non-binding angulations and compares
favourably with a metal slot ceramic bracket. Increasing angulations through 5 to 10 degrees of simulated binding results in
high levels of static frictional resistance such that the bracket behaves more like a conventional polycrystalline ceramic bracket.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 3640)
Received for publication: October 2006
Accepted: February 2007
Such data can suggest clinical trends, but cannot
always be considered a good predictor of clinical
efficiency.
8
Several studies have shown that because of their hard
and rough slot bases, ceramic brackets tend to pro-
duce greater frictional resistance during sliding than
conventional stainless steel brackets.
914
Attempts at
reducing the frictional resistance have resulted in the
incorporation of metal slot linings, which have been
highly successful.
1517
Other developments seeking
to maximise aesthetics, but with improved frictional
behaviour, have included polycrystalline ceramic
brackets with either a silica insert
18
or a smooth,
glazed ceramic slot base. This study compared the
static frictional resistance between a glazed slot
ceramic bracket, a metal lined ceramic bracket and a
conventional ceramic bracket.
Materials and method
Three different polycrystalline ceramic brackets were
tested:
Allure (GAC International, Bohemia, New York,
USA): a conventional polycrystalline ceramic bracket.
Mystique (GAC International, Bohemia, New York,
USA): a polycrystalline ceramic bracket with a
smooth, glazed ceramic slot base.
Clarity (3M-Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA): a polycrys-
talline ceramic bracket with a stainless steel slot insert.
All brackets used were upper left central incisor
brackets with Roth prescription and 0.022 x 0.028
inch slots. Incisor brackets were chosen due to their
flatter profile base which facilitated mounting in the
testing jig. The brackets were from the same batch
code for each bracket type. A sample size calculation
determined that at a statistical power of 90 per cent,
and a significance level of p 0.05, 25 brackets of
each type would be required.
Straight lengths of 0.019 x 0.025 inch rectangular
stainless steel wire Nubryte Gold (GAC
International, Bohemia, New York, USA) were used.
The wires were from the same batch code to ensure
consistency of manufacture.
Saliva Orthana (Nycomed Ltd., Birmingham, UK),
an artificial saliva spray which contains pig mucin,
xylitol, and mineral salts, was used for lubrication.
The three different types of brackets were tested
against the 0.019 x 0.025 inch archwire at 0, 5 and
10 degree bracket to archwire angulations to simulate
increasing levels of bracket binding. A specially con-
structed jig was used to hold the bracket and archwire
in place, with a predetermined archwire tension of
1 kg, bracket angulations of 0, 5 or 10 degrees and a
simulated ligation force of 200 grams.
12
Full details of
the jig have been published in a previous study.
17
Each group of 25 brackets was placed in a solution of
acetone for 10 minutes for degreasing and allowed to
air dry for an equivalent length of time. The brackets
were then transferred to a container containing 5 ml
of artificial saliva and left standing for 24 hours to
permit surface adsorption. The archwire was cut to
lengths of 10 cm and cleaned with an alcohol wipe
immediately before each test. The archwire and
bracket were mounted in the jig and liberally coated
with artificial saliva immediately before testing.
A universal load testing machine (Instron, High
Wycombe, UK) was used to hold the jig in place and
produce a steady movement of the archwire through
the bracket slot. The speed of movement was set at
0.5 mm/min and the test was run over 2.5 mm. All
results were recorded on a microprocessor connected
to the Instron machine. Units of measurement from
the Instron were kN (kiloNewtons) and data were of
the order of 10
3
to 10
4
kN. For data storage in the
computer this was recorded as E03 or E04 kN and
the tabulated data are in this format.
Initial examination of the data revealed that it fol-
lowed a normal distribution, and an analysis of vari-
ance (ANOVA) was carried out to determine statisti-
cally significant differences between groups. The
static frictional resistance of the three different
brackets at 0, 5 and 10 degrees angulations were com-
pared. Where the ANOVA identified significant dif-
ferences between the three brackets, a Bonferroni post
hoc correction was used to localise the differences.
Results
Table I presents the mean static frictional resistances
of each of the three ceramic brackets under test, at 0,
5 and 10 degrees of angulation, together with the 95
per cent confidence interval (95 per cent CI) and
standard error (SE) to report the precision of the
means. Figure 1 illustrates the data graphically.
Table II presents the results of the inter-bracket
Bonferroni post hoc corrections for static friction.
This is intended to identify statistically significant
STATIC FRICTIONAL RESISTANCES OF CERAMIC BRACKETS WITH DIFFERENT SLOT LINING
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 37
differences in static frictional resistance between the
three different brackets by comparing them at each of
the three fixed simulated binding angulations.
Discussion
This comparative laboratory study investigated the
static frictional resistance of three different types of
ceramic brackets under increasing levels of bracket
binding. Although the findings from this laboratory
study cannot be extrapolated directly to the clinical
state because of the lack of biological resistance effects
and occlusal forces on the system, the study has stan-
dardised the majority of variables to enable the effects
of bracket design and bracket/archwire angulation to
be compared. From this, trends may be applied to the
clinical state with caution and may form the basis for
future clinical studies.
8
At 0 degree angulation the Allure bracket produced
frictional forces that were significantly higher than
the other two brackets. (Allure mean: 8.03E-04 kN;
Mystique mean: 5.45E-04 kN; Clarity mean: 5.27E-
04 kN; p < 0.001). The Clarity bracket produced the
lowest resistance to sliding. These results agree with a
number of previous studies which showed that
ceramic brackets with metal slots exhibit lower fric-
tional resistance than conventional ceramic brackets
when sliding against stainless steel wires,
6,10,14,15,19
but is in contrast with a more recent study which
found that at 0 degree angulation a conventional
ceramic bracket demonstrated lower friction than
brackets with metal inserts.
17
However, the conven-
tional ceramic bracket tested was from a different
manufacturer than the Allure bracket used in the
present study and so this may reflect differences in
surface finish.
JONES AND AMOAH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 38
Table I. Static frictional resistances of the brackets.
Bracket Angle Mean (kN) 95% CI SE
Mystique 0 5.45E-04 4.73E-04 3.47E-05
6.16E-04
Mystique 5 1.91E-03 1.77E-03 1.02E-04
2.09E-03
Mystique 10 6.47E-03 5.88E-03 2.85E-04
7.05E-03
Allure 0 8.03E-04 6.85E-04 5.74E-05
9.22E-04
Allure 5 2.05E-03 1.88E-03 8.67E-05
2.23E-03
Allure 10 5.97E-03 5.11E-03 4.18E-04
6.83E-03
Clarity 0 5.27E-04 4.46E-04 3.91E-05
6.083E-04
Clarity 5 1.59E-03 1.37E-03 1.03E-04
1.79E-03
Clarity 10 5.01E-03 4.59E-03 2.03E-04
5.42E-03
Figure 1. Graph of static frictional resistance against bracket type at 0, 5
and 10 degrees bracket/archwire angulations.
Table II. Inter-bracket multiple comparisons for static friction.
Angle Bracket Bracket Mean SE p
(Degrees) (I) (J) difference
(I minus J)
(kN)
0 Allure Mystique 2.58E-04 6.34E-05 < 0.001
Clarity 2.76E-04 6.34E-05 < 0.001
0 Mystique Clarity 1.80E-05 6.34E-05 > 0.99
5 Allure Mystique 1.40E-04 1.26E-04 > 0.99
Clarity 4.60E-04 1.26E-04 0.001
5 Mystique Clarity 3.20E-04 1.26E-04 0.02
10 Allure Mystique -5.00E-04 4.45E-04 0.815
Clarity 9.60E-04 4.45E-04 0.101
10 Mystique Clarity 1.46E-03 4.45E-04 0.005
Significant values are in bold
S
t
a
t
i
c
f
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
(
E
-
0
3
k
N
)
0 degree 5 degrees 10 degrees
Bracket/archwire angulation
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Clarity Mystique Allure
Although the Clarity bracket produced lower fric-
tional values than the Mystique bracket, this was not
statistically significant (p > 0.99). This contrasts with
a previous study which investigated a polycrystalline
ceramic bracket with a silica insert and found lower
friction than with a bracket with a steel slot insert.
18
The statistically significant differences between the
Allure bracket and both the Mystique and Clarity
brackets may be considered clinically significant
when translated to orthodontic forces. The differ-
ences equated to friction levels of approximately
2628 g force.
At 5 degrees angulations, the Allure bracket again
produced the highest levels of friction (Mean: 2.05E-
03 kN), followed by Mystique (Mean: 1.91E-03 kN).
The Clarity bracket produced the least friction
(Mean: 1.59E-03 kN). The differences between the
Allure and Clarity brackets and the Mystique and
Clarity brackets were statistically significant (p = 0.001;
p = 0.02). The Allure bracket produced higher fric-
tional values than the Mystique bracket, but this was
not statistically significant (p > 0.99). Previous work
has suggested that as angulation increases, the resist-
ance to sliding produced is a combination of classic
friction, binding and notching.
46,20
The results of
this study suggest that more binding and notching
may have occurred with the Allure bracket at 5
degrees. The statistically significant differences
between the Clarity brackets and both the Mystique
and Allure brackets can be considered clinically sig-
nificant, and translates to frictional differences of
approximately 32 g force and 46 g force respectively.
At 10 degrees angulations, the Mystique bracket
produced the highest friction (Mean: 6.47E-03 kN),
followed by the Allure brackets (Mean: 5.97E-03 kN)
and the Clarity bracket (Mean: 5.01E-03 kN). The
difference in friction between the Mystique and
Clarity brackets was statistically significant (p = 0.005).
The differences in friction between the Mystique and
Allure brackets, and the Allure and Clarity brackets at
10 degrees were not statistically significant (p = 0.815;
p = 0.101). The greater frictional resistance in the
Mystique bracket at 10 degrees implies that binding
and notching in the Mystique bracket was worse, and
this may reflect a smooth glazed slot base, but rough
slot ends. The difference between the Mystique
bracket and Clarity bracket may be considered highly
clinically significant, with the difference equating to
approximately 146 g force.
Conclusions
1. At 0 degree angulation there was no statistically
significant difference in static friction between the
Mystique and the Clarity brackets. The Allure
bracket produced statistically significantly higher
values for static friction than the other two brackets.
This indicates that at non-binding angulations the
glazed surface of the Mystique may be effective in
reducing the roughness which is often associated with
ceramic brackets.
2. At 5 degrees angulations the Clarity brackets pro-
duced the lowest static frictional resistance and this
was statistically significant when compared to the
other two brackets. There was no significant differ-
ence in frictional resistance between the Mystique
and Allure brackets. This suggests that once the
critical angle for binding is exceeded, when the notch-
ing and binding components of friction are brought
into play, the harder and rougher edges of the
Mystique and Allure bracket slots may have resulted
in higher frictional values.
3. At 10 degrees angulations, the Clarity brackets
once again produced the least friction. The Mystique
bracket produced the highest friction. The only
statistically significant difference in friction was
between the Mystique and Clarity brackets.
4. These findings appear to partially confirm the
manufacturers claim that the frictional resistance of
Mystique brackets is comparable to sliding on metal
surfaces, but this seems only to be true when the
bracket to archwire angulation is below the critical
angle for binding. Once this critical angle is exceeded
the Mystique bracket begins to behave more like a
conventional ceramic bracket. Hence it is recom-
mended when using the Mystique or Allure brackets
in particular, the slots are properly aligned before
commencing sliding mechanics.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr Graham Palmer,
Department of Biomaterials Science, UCL Eastman
Dental Institute, London for technical assistance and
Dr David Moles, Department of Biostatistics, UCL
Eastman Dental Institute, London for statistical
advice. We would also like to thank 3M-Unitek (UK)
for generously donating their brackets for testing and
Nycomed Ltd. (UK) for kindly providing the Saliva
Orthana.
STATIC FRICTIONAL RESISTANCES OF CERAMIC BRACKETS WITH DIFFERENT SLOT LINING
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 39
JONES AND AMOAH
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 40
Corresponding author
Dr S.P. Jones
Unit of Orthodontics
UCL Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care
Sciences
256 Grays Inn Road
London, WC1X 8LD
United Kingdom
Tel: (+44 0) 20 7915 1068
Fax: (+44 0) 20 7915 1238
Email: s.jones@eastman.ucl.ac.uk
References
1. Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher H-A. Frictional forces
between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1989;96:397404.
2. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-
bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod 1997;3:
16677.
3. Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resist-
ance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1999;115:3951.
4. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Assessment of second-order clearances
between orthodontic archwires and bracket slots via the
critical angle for binding. Angle Orthod 1999;69:7180.
5. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Influence of archwire and bracket
dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and deter-
minations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J
Orthod 1999;21:199208.
6. Articolo LC, Kusy K, Saunders CR, Kusy RP. Influence of
ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of arch-
wires during clinical treatment. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:
40925.
7. Kuhlberg AJ, Priebe D. Testing force systems and bio-
mechanics measured tooth movements from differential
moment closing loops. Angle Orthod 2003;73:27080.
8. Kula K, Phillips C, Gibilaro A, Proffit WR. Effect of ion
implantation of TMA archwires on the rate of orthodontic
sliding space closure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1998;114:57780.
9. Angolkar PV, Kapila S, Duncanson MG Jr, Nanda RS.
Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and ortho-
dontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1990;98:499506.
10. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Coefficients of friction for arch wires
in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. 1.
The dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:
30012.
11. Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N, Gunsolley JC. Frictional
resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:398403.
12. Keith O, Jones SP, Davies EH. The influence of bracket
material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of
orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1993;20:10915.
13. Loftus BP, rtun, J, Nicholls JI, Alonzo TA, Stoner JA.
Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in
various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:33645.
14. Nishio C, da Motta AF, Elias CN, Mucha JN. In vitro eval-
uation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic
brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:
5664.
15. Dickson J, Jones S. Frictional characteristics of a modified
ceramic bracket. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:51618.
16. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Influence of stainless steel inserts
on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-
order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod
2003;73:16775.
17. Rajakulendran J, Jones S. Static frictional resistances of
polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts. Aust
Orthod J 2006;22:14752.
18. Cha J-Y, Kim K-S, Hwang C-J. Friction of conventional
and silica-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-wire
combinations. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1007.
19. Ireland AJ, Sheriff M, McDonald F. Effect of bracket and
wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J Orthod 1991;
13:3228.
20. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-lig-
ating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brack-
ets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva)
states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:36170.
Introduction
Several studies have investigated the development of
gingival recession following orthodontic tooth move-
ment.
13
Some authors claim that sagittal expansion
of the lower arch moves the lower incisors labially and
causes the labial gingival attachment to break-
down.
47
This claim is supported by the finding of
alveolar bone dehiscences following labial movement
of the mandibular incisors in animals.
810
However,
other authors have reported there was no association
between labial movement of the lower incisors and
clinical crown length, gingival recession or loss of
attachment in patients.
1113
Transverse expansion may move the teeth beyond the
limits of their bony support and result in gingival
recession. Some studies have reported gingival reces-
sion following expansion of the upper arch and high-
lighted the potential risks of bone fenestration, but
the extent to which the mucogingival tissues can
adapt to transverse expansion is uncertain.
1416
There
is little information on the mucogingival changes in
the lower arch following transverse expansion. The
aim of this study was to determine if changes in the
lower intercanine widths during orthodontic treat-
ment with fixed appliances result in gingival margin
changes around the lower canines and incisors.
Material and methods
Subjects
The subjects of this investigation were 178 Caucasian
adolescents (101 females, 77 males) selected from a
pool of 209 patients treated by two orthodontists in a
private clinic. Subjects were included if they had
either an Angle Class I or a Class II malocclusion
either with or without a transverse and/or vertical
discrepancy, were treated without extractions, had
less than 4 mm spacing or crowding, the lower
permanent incisors were fully erupted, had good perio-
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 41
Lower intercanine width and gingival margin
changes. A retrospective study
Luciane Closs,
*
Karine Squeff,
Dirceu Raveli
*
and Cassiano Rsing
+
Araraquara School of Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University, Araraquara,
*
Specialist practice, Porto Alegre,
2
= 9.72; p = 0.045
Analysis of adjusted residual, p < 0.05, significant association in bold
Table II. Distribution of the Final Initial differences in the intercanine
width and gingival margins.
Differences in intercanine width
(Final minus Initial)
Gingival 1st 2nd 3rd Median
migration Quartile Quartile Quartile rank*
Coronal 0.00 0.01 0.57 50.56
A
Unaltered 0.14 0.90 1.85 87.88
AB
Apical 0.21 1.04 2.58 98.82
B
*Median ranks followed by different letters in the column represent
statistically significant differences between intercanine width in relation
to gingival position (Kruskal Wallis non parametric test: p = 0.028)
the gingival margins in some subjects may be a nor-
mal age change should be borne in mind. Our study
group was relatively young so one could argue that
age-related gingival changes were unlikely to occur.
On the other hand, a longitudinal study of dental
arch widths reported that the lower intercanine
widths were stable up to 6 years of age, increased
gradually with the emergence of the permanent
incisors, decreased up to 15 years of age, and then
remained more-or-less unchanged.
19
Thus, changes
in the intercanine widths in some subjects may have
been an age change, particularly if lower arch treat-
ment was started some time after the initial records
were taken. The final records were taken at least 28
days after removal of the appliances to allow any
inflammation, due to poor plaque control, to resolve.
20
We had a larger sample than other similar studies.
17,18,21
We selected subjects independently of any require-
ment for a change in lower intercanine width. Had
we used a prospective design we would have had bet-
ter control of the variables such as oral hygiene and
avoidance of traumatic tooth brushing. Previous
studies have reported that oral hygiene may be an
important factor. For example, Allais and Melsen
attributed the favourable response of the gingival tis-
sues following controlled proclination of the lower
incisors to maintenance of good oral hygiene.
12
The
same may be true in our study group. However, a
prospective study with a similar number of subjects
would be difficult and expensive to carry out. Our
results may better reflect the effect of orthodontic
treatment on the gingival margins without the
Hawthorne effect when oral hygiene measures are
closely monitored.
In previous studies the intercanine widths were meas-
ured between the cusp tips or the widest points on the
buccal surfaces of the lower canines.
22,23
We meas-
ured from the most cervical points in the middle of
the buccal surfaces of the lower canines with the
objective of measuring changes as close as possible to
the level of the alveolar bone. We have assumed that
the gingival changes around the lower canines and
incisors were associated with changes in intercanine
widths, when changes around the incisors may be due
to proclination. In the present study gingival changes
were based on intra-oral photographs complemented
by study models. This method has been used in pre-
vious studies and it is considered to be more accurate
than measurements carried out on study casts
alone.
12,13,18,21
The developmental position of the teeth is also con-
sidered to be an important predisposing factor to
local gingival recession.
24
Long supracrestal connec-
tive tissue attachments on the buccal surfaces of teeth
in patients undergoing orthodontic expansion are
considered to be at risk of developing gingival reces-
sion over time. Such speculation is reinforced by the
high frequency of gingival recession observed on the
labial/buccal aspects of prominent teeth in individ-
uals who have not received orthodontic treatment.
25,26
Since the maximum crowding in our sample was 4
mm, severely displaced teeth were not seen.
According to Bernimoulin and Curilovie,
27
gingival
recession is always accompanied by a bone dehis-
cence. Whether an underlying bone dehiscence
develops before or parallel with gingival recession has
not been determined. There is a suspicion that an
exaggerated labial tooth position leads to a thin
cortical plate, which is more susceptible to resorp-
tion.
4,28
A bone dehiscence may be an anatomical
variation or due to expansion of teeth through the
cortical plate.
In the present study the intercanine width increased
in the majority of the subjects (66.3 per cent), was
maintained in 18.5 per cent and decreased in 15.2
per cent of the subjects. There was a high percentage
of gingival recession in the subjects with increased
intercanine widths (71.9 per cent), although this per-
centage was not statistically significant. On the other
hand, there was a significant finding in the small
group that had unaltered intercanine widths and
coronal migration of the gingival margins. One
should question the clinical significance of this result
since there were only nine subjects in the group with
coronal gingival migration.
In conclusion, despite the finding that gingival mar-
gin changes tended to occur independently of
changes in intercanine widths, the gingival margins
around the lower incisors and canines are more likely
to migrate coronally when the intercanine width is
unchanged.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Susana Rizzatto for her help with the
sample for this study.
CLOSS ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 44
Corresponding author
Dr Luciane Q. Closs
Rua G.Couto de Magalhes 1070 apto. 801
Porto Alegre RS CEP: 90540-130
Brazil
Tel: (+55 51) 3337 3379
Fax: (+55 51) 3342 7284
Email: lucloss@uol.com.br
References
1. Geiger AM. Mucogingival problems and the movement of
mandibular incisors: a clinical review. Am J Orthod 1980;
78:51127.
2. Wennstrm JL.The significance of the width and thickness
of the gingiva in orthodontic treatment. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z
1990;45:13641.
3. Moriarty JD. Mucogingival considerations for the ortho-
dontic patient. Curr Opin Periodontol 1996;3:97102.
4. Hollender L, Rnnerman A, Thilander B. Root resorption,
marginal bone support and clinical crown length in ortho-
dontically treated patients. Eur J Orthod 1980;2:197205.
5. Coatoam GW, Behrents RG, Bissada NF. The width of kera-
tinized gingiva during orthodontic treatment: its signifi-
cance and impact on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1981;
52:30713.
6. De Loor P, De Smit AA, Adriaens PA. Periodontal changes
induced by orthodontically changed incisor inclination. Eur
J Orthod 1995;17:434.
7. rtun J, Krogstad O. Periodontal status of mandibular
incisors following excessive proclination: a study in adults
with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:22532.
8. Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the mar-
ginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in
monkeys. J Periodontol 1981; 52:31420.
9. Karring T, Nyman S, Thilander B, Magnusson I. Bone
regeneration in orthodontically produced alveolar bone
dehiscences. J Periodontal Res 1982;17:30915.
10. Thilander B, Nyman, S, Karring T, Magnusson I. Bone
regeneration in alveolar bone dehiscences related to ortho-
dontic tooth movements. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:10514.
11. Busschop JL, Van Vlierberghe M, De Boever J, Dermaut L.
The width of the attached gingiva during orthodontic treat-
ment: a clinical study in human patients. Am J Orthod
1985;87:2249.
12. Allais D, Melsen B. Does labial movement of lower incisors
influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control
study of adult orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:
34352.
13. Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the develop-
ment of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular
incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:55261.
14. Carmen M, Marcella P, Giuseppe C, Roberto A. Periodontal
evaluation in patients undergoing maxillary expansion. J
Craniofac Surg 2000;11:4914.
15. Bassarelli T, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Changes in clinical crown
height as a result of transverse expansion of the maxilla in
adults. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:1218.
16. Greenbaum KR, Zachrisson BU. The effect of palatal expan-
sion therapy on the periodontal supporting tissues. Am J
Orthod 1982;81:1221.
17. Djeu G, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. Correlation between
mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival reces-
sion during fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2002;72:
23845.
18. Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclina-
tion of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gin-
gival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:
1006.
19. Tsujino K, Machida Y. A longitudinal study of the growth
and development of the dental arch width from childhood to
adolescence in Japanese. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1998;39:
7589.
20. Sallum EJ, Nouer DF, Klein MI, Gonalves RB, Machion L,
Wilson Sallum A, Sallum EA. Clinical and microbiologic
changes after removal of orthodontic appliances. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:3636.
21. rtun J, Grobty D. Periodontal status of mandibular inci-
sors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during ado-
lescence: a follow-up evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2001;119:210.
22. Kahl-Nieke B, Fischbach H, Schwarze C. Treatment and
postretention changes in dental arch width dimensions a
long-term evaluation of influencing cofactors. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:36878.
23. Richardson ME. Late lower arch crowding: the role of the
transverse dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1995;107:6137.
24. Parfitt GJ, Mjr IA. A clinical evaluation of local gingival
recession in children. J Dent Child 1964;31:25762.
25. Gorman WJ. Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. J
Periodontol 1967;38:31622.
26. Maynard JG, Ochsenbein C. Mucogingival problems, preva-
lence and therapy in children. J Periodontol 1975;46:
54352.
27. Bernimoulin JP, Curilovie Z. Gingival recession and tooth
mobility. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:10714.
28. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of periodon-
tal lesions and remodeling during orthodontic treatment.
Part III. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:22437.
LOWER INTERCANINE WIDTH AND GINGIVAL MARGIN CHANGES
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 45
Introduction
The prevalence of white spots in patients treated with
fixed orthodontic appliances varies between 12 and
26 per cent.
13
The ability of fluoride compounds to
prevent enamel demineralisation is well known.
48
For example, Basdera et al. reported that fluoride
released from orthodontic bonding agents partially
protected the enamel surface from demineralisation.
8
Topacal C-5, a milk protein-based formulation super-
saturated with calcium and phosphate, has been
shown to remineralise enamel lesions in humans.
9
An
in vitro study also demonstrated that casein phos-
phopeptide stabilised calcium phosphate solution
(CPP-ACP) will remineralise subsurface lesions in
human enamel,
10
and incorporation of CPP-ACP in
a self-cure glassionomer cement will protect the
dentine against acid attack.
11
Since no quantitative
information has been reported on the effect of
CPP-ACP on the enamel surrounding orthodontic
brackets this study was designed to determine if
Topacal C-5 inhibits enamel demineralisation
adjacent to orthodontic brackets in vitro.
Materials and methods
Twenty four paired right and left non-carious human
premolars with no visible enamel defects were used in
this study. The teeth (N = 48) were extracted from 24
orthodontic patients living in a low fluoride area (0.4
ppm). The patients were between 10 and 14 years of
age at the time of the extractions. Any soft tissue, cal-
culus and/or bone remaining on the teeth following
extraction were removed with a dental scaler and the
teeth stored in deionised water until required.
One premolar in each pair was randomly assigned to
the control group and the contralateral premolar was
assigned to the experimental group. The buccal sur-
faces of the crowns were polished with a mixture of
non-fluoridated pumice and water and masked with
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 46
Effect of Topacal C-5 on enamel adjacent to
orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study
Navid Karimi Nasab, Zahra Dalili Kajan and Azadeh Balalaie
Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Background: Enamel demineralisation leading to white spots can occur during orthodontic treatment. Casein phosphopeptides
may reduce demineralisation during orthodontic treatment.
Aims: To determine if a casein phosphopeptide preparation, Topacal C-5 (Enamel Improving Cream, NSI Dental Pty Ltd,
Leighton, Hornsby, Australia), will inhibit demineralisation of enamel adjacent to orthodontic brackets.
Methods: Twenty-four pairs of human premolars from 24 subjects were used. One premolar in each pair was randomly
assigned to the control group and the contralateral premolar was assigned to the experimental group. A stainless steel
orthodontic bracket was bonded to the buccal surface of each tooth and a window of enamel (4 mm x 1 mm) left open to
acid attack. The teeth were cycled alternately through an artificial saliva medium (11 hours) and an acid medium (1 hour) for
31 days. Topacal C-5 was applied to the exposed enamel windows in the experimental group after immersion in the acid
medium. After 31 days the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and the depths of the enamel lesions measured by polarised
light microscopy.
Results: Significantly deeper demineralisation occurred in the control teeth not protected by Topacal C-5 and at sites close to the
brackets in both groups.
Conclusions: In this in vitro system, Topacal C-5 partially reduced the depth of enamel demineralisation compared with teeth
not covered with Topacal C-5. Topacal C-5 may reduce enamel demineralisation in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 4649)
Received for publication: July 2006
Accepted: March 2007
EFFECT OF TOPACAL C- 5 ON ENAMEL ADJACENT TO ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 47
tape. A small window was left in the tape to accom-
modate a premolar bracket with 1 mm clearance on
all sides of the base. A premolar stainless steel
bracket (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) was
bonded to the buccal surface of each tooth with a
fluoride-free composite resin (Prime-dent, Dent
World, Chicago, USA). The masking tape was
removed and any residue of the tape wiped away with
ethanol. Acid resistant nail varnish (Nivea,
Beiersdorf, Hamburg, Germany) was then painted on
the enamel surface leaving a rectangular window (4
mm x 1 mm) extending occlusally from each bracket.
The teeth in each group were immersed separately in
an artificial saliva solution for 11 hours and an acid
solution for 1 hour. Both solutions were agitated con-
stantly and maintained at room temperature. The
artificial saliva solution had a neutral pH and con-
tained 20 mmol/L KHCO
3
, 3 mmol/L KH2PO4
and 1 mmol/L CaCl
2
. After 11 hours the teeth were
removed and immersed in the acid solution for 1
hour. The acid solution contained 2.2 mmol/L Ca
2
+,
2.2 mmol/L PO
4
- and 50 mmol/L acetic acid at 4.4
pH. After each acid challenge, the surface layers in
the exposed enamel windows in both groups were
removed by brushing for 5 seconds with a soft tooth-
brush (Oral-B Laboratories, Belmont, California,
USA). Topacal C-5 was applied to the exposed
enamel in the experimental group before immersion
in the saliva solution. The teeth were immersed alter-
nately in the saliva and acid solutions for 31 days.
The solutions were changed twice a week and the pH
of each solution was monitored.
After 31 days the brackets were removed and the
teeth mounted in polyester resin. The teeth were
sectioned longitudinally through the buccal windows
with a hard tissue microtome (Figure 1). Two sections,
each approximately 0.5 mm thick, were obtained
from each specimen. The sections were thinned and
polished with increasing finer grades of aluminum
oxide powder (Buehler, Evanston, Illinois, USA).
The sections were mounted in water and photo-
graphed with a polarised light microscope (Zeiss,
Oberkochen, Germany) at 4x magnification (Figure
2). To facilitate measurement of the photographs a
straight line was drawn between the intact enamel
areas on the buccal surface of each specimen. The
depths of demineralised enamel (m) in each section
were measured at three sites: near the gingival margin
and close to the bracket, d1; in the middle of the
demineralised area, d2; and near the occlusal margin,
d3. The observer was blinded to the identity of the
sections (i.e. experimental or control). The means and
standard deviations of the depths at the three sites
(d1, d2, d3) were calculated.
The t-test for unpaired data was used to compare the
depths of the lesions in the control and the experi-
mental groups and the paired t-test was used to com-
pare the depths of the lesions at d1 and d3 in the
same specimens. Statistical significance was set at the
5 per cent level.
Results
The results are given in Table I and Figure 3.
Significantly deeper demineralisation occurred in the
Figure 1. Longitudinal section of tooth embedded in polyester. The lesion is
indicated by the arrow.
Figure 2. Enamel lesion in the control group viewed by polarised light
microscopy. A, demineralised lesion; B, residual enamel; C, amelo-dentinal
junction (4x magnification).
control teeth compared with the experimental teeth
and at sites (d1) close to the brackets in both groups.
In the experimental group the enamel was demin-
eralised to a depth of 5.17 m close to the bracket
(d1), 2.79 m in the centre of the demineralised
area (d2) and only 1.58 m at d3, where it was fur-
thest from the base of the bracket. In the experi-
mental group the difference between d1 and d3 was
statistically significant.
Deeper demineralisation occurred in all sites in the
control group compared with the experimental
group. In this group demineralisation extended 11.25
m into the enamel close to the bracket (d1), 8.37
m in the mid-zone (d2) and 6.92 m at d3.
Furthermore, deeper demineralisation occurred at d3
in the control group than at d1 in the experimental
group. In the control group the difference between d1
and d3 was also statistically significant.
Discussion
The results confirmed that regular applications of
Topacal C-5 to teeth subjected to acid attack in vitro
had less enamel demineralisation compared with
teeth not treated with Topacal C-5. The deepest dem-
ineralisation occurred close to the bracket bases in
both the Topacal C-5 treated teeth and untreated
teeth. Casein phosphopeptide preparations, such as
Topacal C-5, inhibit enamel demineralistion and
enhance remineralisation of subsurface enamel
lesions in vivo by creating a supersaturated zone of
calcium and phosphate ions in dental plaque.
810
Although Topacal C-5 conferred partial protection
against acid attack in our in vitro model, it still needs
to be tested clinically.
Our finding that the deepest demineralisation in
both groups occurred close to the bracket bases and
the shallowest demineralisation occurred towards the
occlusal surface may be due to morphological differ-
ences in the enamel, or it may be due to the different
environmental conditions in our in vitro model. It
could be postulated that fluid movement and/or the
chemical conditions in our model reduced either the
amount or the effectiveness of the Topacal C-5 close
to the brackets. The former could be due to agitation
and the latter to components in the artificial saliva,
the bracket and/or the bonding agent. These factors
require further investigation.
Regular applications of Topacal C-5 to sites at risk
may prove to be an effective method of reducing the
effects of demineralisation in susceptible patients,
such as those with poor oral hygiene or salivary gland
dysfunction.
4
However, Topacal C-5 is a milk
product and should not be used on patients allergic to
milk protein. The effectiveness of Topacal C-5 in
preventing white spot lesions may be further
enhanced if it is combined with fluoride-releasing
cements, bonding materials and varnishes.
6
It has
been postulated that fluoride-releasing materials may
inhibit enamel demineralisation adjacent to ortho-
dontic brackets by forming a protective deposit
of calcium fluoride-like particles on the enamel
surface.
8
Although these materials may not prevent
NASAB ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 48
Table I. Comparison of enamel demineralisation (m) in the experimental
and control groups.
Site Experimental Control p
d1 N 24 24 0.000
Mean 5.17 11.25
SD 3.77 3.10
d2 N 24 24 0.000
Mean 2.79 8.37
SD 1.82 3.16
d3 N 24 24 0.000
Mean 1.58 6.92
SD 1.21 3.68
Significant values in bold
Experimental group, d1 versus d3, p < 0.000
Control group, d1 versus d3, p < 0.019
Figure 3. Mean depths of the enamel lesions in the control and experimental
groups.
Control group Experimental group
11.2
5.1
8.3
2.7
6.9
1.5
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
D
e
p
t
h
(
m
)
d1 d2 d3
EFFECT OF TOPACAL C- 5 ON ENAMEL ADJACENT TO ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 49
demineralisation they may reduce the formation of
enamel lesions and remineralise subsurface enamel
lesions.
Previous studies have reported white spot lesions in
patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances.
13
These lesions can occur rapidly in susceptible patients
with fixed appliances. They invariably occur in areas
on the tooth surface that are difficult to clean, and
often on the labial surfaces of the incisors and canines.
Materials such as Topacal C-5
9,10
and fluoride
varnishes
6,7
that promote remineralisation of existing
lesions or prevent small lesions from becoming larger,
should be used if possible. In comparison with the
effect of fluoride varnish on demineralised enamel
adjacent to orthodontic brackets,
7
the casein
phosphopeptide preparation we used also reduced
demineralisation by more than 50 per cent.
Conclusions
In this in vitro study Topacal C-5 reduced the demin-
eralisation of enamel adjacent to orthodontic brackets
compared with teeth not covered with Topacal C-5.
Topacal C-5 may reduce enamel demineralisation in
patients with poor oral hygiene or patients suscept-
ible to enamel demineralisation, but it may not be
appropriate in patients allergic to milk products.
Corresponding author
Professor Zahra Dalili
Department of Maxillofacial Radiology
Dental School
Opp. Pardis Hotel
P.C. 41887-94755, Rasht
Iran
Tel: +98(0) 131 772 5968
Fax: +98(0) 131 772 5968 or 323 0776
Email: dalili@gums.ac.ir
References:
1. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic
treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;82:627.
2. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19year-olds:
a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons
5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1989;96:4237.
3. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white
spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod
1982;81:938.
4. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J, Ten Cate JM. Orthodontic
appliances and enamel demineralization: Part I. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:6873.
5. Van der Linden RP, Dermaut LR. White spot formation
under orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer with
or without Fluor Protector. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:21924.
6. Todd MA, Staley RN, Kanellis M, Donly KJ, Wefel JS.
Effect of a fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to
orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1999;116:15967.
7. Schmit JL, Staley RN, Wefel JS, Kanellis M, Jakobsen JR,
Keenan PJ. Effect of fluoride varnish on demineralization
adjacent to brackets bonded with RMGI cement. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:12534.
8. Basdra EK, Huber H, Komposh G. Fluoride released from
orthodontic bonding agents alters the enamel surface and
inhibits enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:46672.
9. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions
by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate
solutions. J Dent Res 1997;76:158795.
10. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ, Dashper SG, Eakins D,
Reynolds EC. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-
amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement.
J Dent Res 2003;82:91418.
11. Ogaard B. Effects of fluoride on caries development and
progression in vivo. J Dent Res 1990;69:8139.
Introduction
Interest in orthodontic treatment as well as provision
of orthodontic care has increased considerably over
the past decades.
15
The evaluation of orthodontic
care is necessary to determine if treatment was under-
taken appropriately.
3,4
Several studies have shown
that even after orthodontic treatment significant
levels of malocclusion remain, and children have
reported unfavourable impacts on their quality of life
related to their teeth.
57
With increasing emphasis on evidence-based health
services, the need to document the impact of pro-
vided care is a challenge to the orthodontic profes-
sion.
8
Hence, in communities with public-funded
orthodontic care and where the selection of patients
for treatment is based on severity of the malocclusion,
the impact of orthodontic care is usually assessed by
selecting cases with a clear-cut treatment need from
the population.
3,4,9
Whereas in communities where
the patient pays for treatment, concern for and a
desire to improve dentofacial appearance is a signifi-
cant motive to seek orthodontic treatment,
10,11
but is
still strongly dependent on the ability to pay. In such
cases, treatment is often influenced more by demand
than by need.
6,12,13
Obviously the impact of provided orthodontic treat-
ment should be evaluated, irrespective of the payment
system. Assessment of the impact of the orthodontic
care systems, either in individual patients or in the
population at large, does permit a better allocation of
the available resources and manpower, improvement
in the laws and regulations governing the provision
of orthodontic care, and the planning of different
alternatives in order to solve the populations needs.
In Peru, where there are few orthodontists and treat-
ment is too expensive for most people, two recent
studies reported that approximately a third of a
sample of young adults had a definite orthodontic
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 50
The impact of orthodontic treatment on normative
need. A case-control study in Peru
Eduardo Bernab,
*
Socorro A. Borges-Yez
and Department of
Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
+
Objective: To assess the impact of previously provided orthodontic treatment on the normative need in a sample of young adult
Peruvians.
Methods: Six hundred and thirty five freshmen, representative of all first year students registering in 2002 at a private university
in Lima, were randomly screened to obtain 63 cases and 126 controls. A case was defined as having a definite orthodontic
treatment need determined by the DAI and IOTN indices simultaneously. A control was defined as having no need of orthodon-
tic treatment based on both indices. Students were also asked if they had previously undergone any orthodontic treatment.
Binary logistic regression was used for the statistical analysis.
Results: Sex, age and socioeconomic status of the students were not statistically associated with normative orthodontic treatment
need (p = 0.258, 0.556 and 0.272 respectively). The percentage of students with a previous history of orthodontic treat-
ment was similar between the cases and the controls (14.3 per cent and 11.9 per cent respectively). There were no statistically
significant associations between the variables.
Conclusions: The impact of previously provided orthodontic treatment on the current normative need of young adults was limit-
ed. Properly designed studies are required to assess the reasons for these findings.
(Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 5054)
Received for publication: September 2006
Accepted: April 2007
IMPACT OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT ON NORMATIVE NEED
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 51
treatment need based on clinical normative need.
14,15
In such circumstances, before planning ortho-
dontic services, it is important to evaluate whether
treatments currently being done are effective.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the
impact of previously provided orthodontic treatment
on the normative treatment need in a sample of
young adult Peruvians. It was hypothesised that the
percentage of individuals with a previous history of
orthodontic treatment would be higher in the group
without normative orthodontic treatment need than
in the group with normative orthodontic treatment
need. Since previous studies have reported that the
desire for orthodontic treatment and orthodontic
treatment need are influenced by age, sex and socio-
economic status,
10,1618
we controlled for these
sociodemographic characteristics.
Materials and methods
Study design
For this case-control study, 635 freshmen, representa-
tive of all first year students admitted in 2002 to a
private university in Lima, Peru were randomly
screened. A final sample of 63 cases and 126 controls
was selected for this case-control study. The sample
size was calculated to find a statistically significant
association between previous history of orthodontic
treatment and normative orthodontic treatment
need (Odds ratio = 0.25), with an 80 per cent power
( = 0.20) and at the 5 per cent level ( = 0.05).
A case was defined as a young adult with an ortho-
dontic treatment need based on two needs indices: a
mandatory to highly desirable need (31 points or
more) according to Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and
very great to great need (categories 4 or 5) accord-
ing to Dental Health Component of the Index for
Orthodontic Treatment Need (DHC-IOTN).
11,19
A
control was a young adult with no or slight need (25
points or less) according to DAI and little to no
need (categories 1 or 2) according to DHC-IOTN.
The indices were selected because of their wide inter-
national use. The DAI has been adopted by the
WHO as a cross-cultural index,
20
and the IOTN is
commonly used in European countries.
9,12
Previous
authors have reported differences in the diagnostic
results attained with both indices individually,
2123
therefore both the DAI and IOTN indices were used
to ensure rigorous criteria of need. Although all
indices have their limitations,
9,12
simultaneous use of
more than one index could partially overcome the
limitations of a single index. It was considered that
the information collected by one index would com-
plement the information collected by the other index
and vice versa.
All assessed students signed a voluntary consent form
and none were receiving active orthodontic treat-
ment. The International Research Board at the
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia gave ethical
approval for the study.
Data collection
Data were collected by a clinical examination and a
structured interview. Clinical examinations were
carried out at the University Dental Clinic by one
calibrated examiner using the DAI and the DHC-
IOTN. Intra-examiner reliability was assessed by
repeated assessments on 10 students on different days
(0.85 and 0.89 respectively, weighted Kappa).
For the DAI, 10 occlusal traits were assessed accord-
ing to three components: dentition, spacing-
crowding and occlusion.
19
Scores for each trait were
weighted and added to a constant to obtain a final
DAI score for each student. Based on this score,
students were classified as having no or slight ( 25
points), elective (2630 points), highly desirable
(3135 points) or mandatory ( 36 points)
orthodontic treatment need.
19,20
For the DHC-IOTN, 10 traits of malocclusion were
assessed: overjet, reverse overjet, overbite, openbite,
crossbite, crowding, impeded eruption, defects of
cleft lip and palate as well as any craniofacial anom-
aly, Class II and Class III buccal occlusions, and
hypodontia. Only the highest scoring trait was used
for assessing the treatment need.
9,11
Each student
was then classified as having no (1), slight (2),
moderate (3), great (4) or very great (5) treatment
need.
11
During interviews, students were asked to give per-
sonal data as well as their university tuition fee scale
as an indirect measure of their socioeconomic status
(SES). At this private university, students pay differ-
ent tuition fees based upon family income as well as
their parents and/or their own main occupation.
With this information, an ordinal scale of three cate-
gories was created: low, medium and high SES.
15,24
Finally, students were asked if they had previously
had orthodontic treatment, irrespective of whether
removable or fixed appliances were used.
Statistical analysis
The effect of each covariable (sex, age and SES) on
normative orthodontic treatment need was assessed
by univariate binary logistic regression analyses.
Then, the impact of the previous history of ortho-
dontic treatment on normative need was also assessed
through a univariate binary logistic regression.
Finally, a multivariate binary logistic regression was
carried out to assess possible interactions between a
previous history of orthodontic treatment and the
covariables on normative need. Odds Ratios (OR)
were also calculated as a measure of effect.
Results
Sixty three young adult cases with normative ortho-
dontic treatment need (Mean age: 18.03 years;
Females: 41.3 per cent) and 126 young adult controls
without normative orthodontic treatment need
(Mean age: 17.90 years; Females: 50.0 per cent) were
clinically assessed using the two indices.
The distribution of cases and controls according to
covariables is shown in Table I. There were no statis-
tically significant associations between students
normative orthodontic treatment need and their sex
(p = 0.258), age (p = 0.556) and SES (p 0.272).
A higher percentage of students with normative
orthodontic treatment need, based on the DAI and
DHC-IOTN, reported a previous history of ortho-
dontic treatment than those without normative
orthodontic treatment need (14.3 per cent versus
11.9 per cent): the difference was not statistically sig-
nificant (p = 0.556). When the association between
previous history of orthodontic treatment and nor-
mative need was assessed by multivariate analysis,
controlling for sex, age and SES of the students as
well as including possible two-term and three-term
interactions in the model, no statistically significant
association or interaction was found (p > 0.05 for all
cases).
Discussion
In our study, contrary to what we expected, the per-
centage of previously treated young adults was similar
among those with and without normative ortho-
dontic treatment need. Almost 15 per cent of subjects
with a definite level of normative treatment need had
previously received orthodontic treatment. That sug-
gests that the orthodontic treatment provided to
these individuals was ineffective.
The results of orthodontic treatment are not always
ideal or even satisfactory.
1,2
A point to consider is that
it is likely that individuals who have been ortho-
dontically treated had more severe orthodontic
problems than those who have not been treated.
1
BERNAB
E ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 52
Table I. Associations between the covariables, past history of orthodontic treatment and normative orthodontic treatment need in young adult Peruvians.
Factors Need No need
N Per cent N Per cent Odds ratio 95% CI p*
Sex
Female 26 41.3 63 50.0 1.00
Male 37 58.7 63 50.0 1.42 0.77; 2.62 0.258
Age in years
Mean (SD) 18.03 (1.50) 17.90 (1.35) 1.07 0.86; 1.32 0.556
Socioeconomic status (SES)
Low SES 37 58.7 64 50.8 1.00
Medium SES 23 36.5 51 40.5 0.78 0.41; 1.48 0.445
High SES 3 4.8 11 8.7 0.47 0.12; 1.80 0.272
Previous history of orthodontic treatment
Without 54 85.7 111 88.1 1.00
With 9 14.3 15 11.9 1.23 0.51; 2.99 0.643
* Binary logistic regression
IMPACT OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT ON NORMATIVE NEED
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 53
Therefore, the amount and complexity of ortho-
dontic treatment required could have been higher
and optimal results more difficult to obtain.
An evaluation of the occlusal characteristics of the
nine unsuccessfully treated individuals in this study
showed that four of them had an increased overjet
greater than 6 mm, four had dental crowding greater
than 4 mm, and one had extensive hypodontia
with restorative implications. Therefore, reasons for
the results reported here might be an unfavourable
skeletal growth pattern during and/or after treatment,
relapse after treatment or insufficient compliance
resulting in incomplete treatment or compromised
treatment goals.
2,24
No information about the
completion of previous orthodontic treatment was
collected.
Other significant factors not evaluated were: if the
previous orthodontic treatment was provided by
general dentists or by orthodontic specialists, and the
type of appliances used. It is not uncommon for
general practitioners to treat individuals with minor
malocclusions.
25,26
Although the merits of ortho-
dontic care by general dentists will continue to be
debated, it would be useful to determine the amount
and types of orthodontic care that general dentists
perform and compare them to the cases specialists
treat.
27,28
Even though the finding from this study may be sur-
prising, some previous cross-sectional studies have
reported similar normative treatment need levels in
orthodontically treated and untreated groups.
1,2,8,29
Conversely, when longitudinal designs were used,
based mainly on pre- and post-treatment records, the
provision of orthodontic treatment was shown to be
effective, and cost-effective.
4,28,3032
Although almost 12 per cent of the young adults
without normative need had received previous ortho-
dontic treatment it was not possible to measure the
magnitude of change because the study design did
not allow us to determine the initial occlusal condi-
tion. No longitudinal data on pre- and post-ortho-
dontic treatment was available. This limitation has
been previously reported.
28,33
It has been recommended that the impact of ortho-
dontic services should be assessed by longitudinal
studies with initial and final clinical examinations.
3,4
However, the quality of the case records varies widely
among dental professionals in Peru, especially among
general dentists, making this information difficult to
obtain. In such situations, alternative study designs
are required and observational studies might provide
some useful information.
To date, there has been no published work on the
impact of orthodontic treatment provided in Peru.
Therefore, the present results will serve as a starting
point to set standards for the provision of ortho-
dontic care in Peru by orthodontists and general prac-
titioners, using evidence-based outcomes to assign
scarce public resources to those with the most need.
Although this study was only designed to assess the
impact of treatment on normative orthodontic treat-
ment need, it has to be understood that the profes-
sional perspective is only one of the components to be
evaluated. If the objective for orthodontic treatment
is only related to clinically measurable physical defor-
mities, the broader concepts of health are not taken
into account.
29,34
Especially in orthodontics, broader
concepts of health should be considered. They
include the psychological and social well-being of the
individual since orthodontic treatment may alter the
individuals facial appearance, thereby affecting self-
image.
1,24,34
Further studies should be done which
involve not only the effect of the orthodontic treat-
ment from a professional perspective, but also the
psychosocial impact of treatment on individuals and
their satisfaction with their teeth and mouth.
It must be noted that the population of young
adults attending the selected university may not
represent typical young adult Peruvians as this uni-
versity was selected for its convenience. For that
reason generalisation of the results has to be made
with caution.
Since the hypothesis that a higher percentage of
orthodontic treatment would be found in individuals
without normative need than in those with need
could not be confirmed, it is concluded that the
impact of the orthodontic treatment provided in this
sample of young adults was limited. As the design of
the present study did not allow us to determine the
factors responsible for the present results, further
studies are required to answer this question.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Professor Aubrey
Sheiham for his comments on the final version of this
article.
BERNAB
E ET AL
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 54
Corresponding author
Dr Eduardo Bernab
Departamento de Odontologa Social
Facultad de Estomatologa
Avenida Honorio Delgado 430
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia,
Lima 31, Peru
Tel: (+51 1) 319 0059
Fax: (+51 1) 381 0607
Email: 06032@upch.edu.pe
References
1. Tuominen ML, Nystrom M, Tuominen RJ. Subjective and
objective orthodontic treatment need among orthodontic-
ally treated and untreated Finnish adolescents. Community
Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23:28690.
2. Kerosuo H, Kerosuo E, Niemi M, Simola H. The need for
treatment and satisfaction with dental appearance among
young Finnish adults with and without a history of ortho-
dontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:33040.
3. Richmond S, Phillips CJ, Dunstan F, Daniels C, Durning P,
Leahy F. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of orthodontic
provision. Dent Update 2004;31:14652.
4. Richmond S, Dunstan F, Phillips C, Daniels C, Durning P,
Leahy F. Measuring the cost, effectiveness, and cost-effec-
tiveness of orthodontic care. World J Orthod 2005;6:
16170.
5. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hagg U. The impact of malocclusion
and its treatment on quality of life: a literature review. Int J
Paediatr Dent 2006;16:3817.
6. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its
impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian
adolescents. J Orthod 2004;31:207; discussion 15.
7. Klages U, Bruckner A, Zentner A. Dental aesthetics, self-
awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young
adults. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:50714.
8. Lagerstrom L, Stenvik A, Espeland L, Hallgren A. Outcome
of a scheme for orthodontic care: a comparison of untreated
and treated 19-year-olds. Swed Dent J 2000;24:4957.
9. Shaw WC, Richmond S, OBrien KD. The use of occlusal
indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1995;107:110.
10. Reichmuth M, Greene KA, Orsini MG, Cisneros GJ, King
GJ, Kiyak HA. Occlusal perceptions of children seeking
orthodontic treatment: impact of ethnicity and socio-
economic status. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;
128:57582.
11. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of
orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:30920.
12. Jarvinen S. Indexes for orthodontic treatment need. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:2379.
13. Hamdan AM. The relationship between patient, parent and
clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment
need. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:26571.
14. Bernab E, Flores-Mir C. Normative and self-perceived
orthodontic treatment need of a Peruvian university
population. Head Face Med 2006;2:22.
15. Bernab E, Flores-Mir C. Orthodontic treatment need in
Peruvian young adults evaluated through Dental Aesthetic
Index. Angle Orthod 2006;76:41721.
16. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Berset GP, Eriksen HM. Attitudes to
malocclusion among 18- and 35-year-old Norwegians.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:3903.
17. Tickle M, Kay EJ, Bearn D. Socio-economic status and
orthodontic treatment need. Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol 1999;27:41318.
18. Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Attitudes towards
orthodontic treatment: a comparison of treated and untreated
subjects. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:14854.
19. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the dental aesthetic
index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry, University of Iowa;
1986.
20. WHO. Oral Health Surveys: basic methods. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 1997.
21. Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two ortho-
dontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment need
and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1996;110:41016.
22. Beglin FM, Firestone AR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Kuthy RA,
Wade D. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3
occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:2406.
23. Johnson M, Harkness M, Crowther P, Herbison P. A com-
parison of two methods of assessing orthodontic treatment
need in the mixed dentition: DAI and IOTN. Aust Orthod
J 2000;16:827.
24. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ, Nystrom ME. Subjective
orthodontic treatment need and perceived dental appearance
among young Finnish adults with and without previous
orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Health 1994;11:
2933.
25. Huang GJ, Marston BE, del Aguila MA. Orthodontic care in
an insured population in Washington: demographic factors.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:7416.
26. Mirabelli JT, Huang GJ, Siu CH, King GJ, Omnell L. The
effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid
population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:
5928.
27. Huang GJ, del Aguila MA. Distribution of orthodontic
services and fees in an insured population in Washington.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:36672.
28. Radnzic D. Effectiveness of community-based salaried
orthodontic services provided in England and Wales. J
Orthod 2002;29:11923.
29. Pietila T, Pietila I. Dental appearance and orthodontic ser-
vices assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in eastern
Finland. Community Dent Health 1996;13:13944.
30. OBrien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal
indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment
by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br
J Orthod 1993;20:2535.
31. Bergstrom K, Halling A. Orthodontic treatment outcome in
three Swedish counties with different orthodontic resources.
Swed Dent J 1996;20:5160.
32. Richmond S, Ikonomou C, Williams B, Ramel S, Rolfe B,
Kurol J. Orthodontic treatment standards in a public group
practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 2001;25:13744.
33. Shaw WC, Addy M, Dummer PM, Ray C, Frude N. Dental
and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of ortho-
dontic treatment: a strategy for investigation. Community
Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:604.
34. WHO. Oral health for the 21st century. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 1994.
Introduction
Broadbent
1
first introduced the use of cephalometry
in dentistry approximately 36 years after the dis-
covery of X-rays by Roentgen in 1895.
2
Despite
accepted limitations, lateral and posteroanterior
cephalometry is still considered to be a practical,
affordable and low radiation dose imaging technique.
To the trained eye, the information gained from these
cephalograms is often adequate for use in clinical
orthodontics. Despite the availability of perhaps
more sophisticated imaging techniques, the replace-
ment of cephalometry in orthodontic practice would
require a real analysis of the cost:benefit ratio for
individual orthodontic patients.
In 1917, Radon demonstrated that an infinite set of
two-dimensional (2D) projections could be used to
create a representative image of a three-dimensional
(3D) structure. Hounsfield later developed the
computerised axial transverse scanning technique and
the first commercially available computed tom-
ography (CT) scanner was later marketed in 1972.
3
By the early 1980s, both researchers and clinicians
were investigating the potential for 3D imaging of
craniofacial structures and deformities. Continued
development of CT scanners since then, has involved
changes in the geometry of the radiation beam, the
number of detector rows, the image resolution and
the speed and efficiency of image acquisition.
3D reconstructed images may enhance the clinicians
three-dimensional perception of anatomical and
morphological features of individual patients, in turn,
facilitating the development of a more appropriate
individualised treatment plan than might have been
possible with the use of conventional 2D imaging
techniques. With all this in mind, this review article
addresses the basic principles behind the use of CT
imaging, the potential clinical applications of 3D-CT
images in orthodontic practice and the possible
limitations of the technique.
What is computed tomography?
The basic component of a helical CT scanner is the
gantry that continuously rotates during volume data
acquisition, as the patient is transported through the
machine.
The gantry is comprised of numerous rows of
detector arrays, an X-ray source and the patient
Australian Orthodontic Journal Volume 23 No. 1 May 2007 55
Three-dimensional computed craniofacial
tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and
limitations
Hong Jin Chan,
*
Michael Woods
Departments of Orthodontics
*
and Oral Surgery,