Osei Appiah, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Communication The Ohio State University 2 Definition Crisis decision theory predicts the actions people take (or choose not to take) in response to negative life events The theory addresses responses to negative events that have already occurred and not proactive attempts to prevent the occurrence of negative events Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 3 Crisis decision theory describes the processes involved in responding to negative events and the processes involved in making choices by: A) Assessing the severity of the negative event B) Determining response options C) Evaluating response options Woman awakens in the night to the smell of smoke; quickly assess the situations and considers her options: 1) ignore the smell go back to sleep; 2) call 911; 3) gathers a few belongings and exits the house before calling for help Loss of job vs. loss of wallet
Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 4 Stage 1: Assessing the Severity of the Negative Event People seek information in an attempt to understand the threat they face People consider past experiences, causes, and consequences to develop an understanding of how to address the negative event Person must judge the event to be sufficiently threatening to warrant further consideration CEO of Bank of America response to the protest and petition of the debit fee Extremely severe events might lead to an inability or unwillingness to further consider implications of the event Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 5 Stage 1: Assessing the Severity of the Negative Event: Information About Causes (Internal cause or External cause of events) People are most likely to make active attempts to respond to a negative event when they feel a sense of responsibility for both the problem and the solution Research has suggested that events perceived to be caused by ones own actions may be more likely than externally caused events to prompt active attempts to find a solution to the situation (e.g., BP Oil Spill, Firestone, Dow Corning & Breast Implants) People responsible for events see them as more severe and, unless the responsibility is overwhelming, are more likely to take action to address the situation People are most likely to take action in response to an event for which they feel moderate responsibility (inverted-U shaped relationship; benign crisis vs. severe)
Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 6 Stage 1: Assessing the Severity of the Negative Event: Comparative Information Crisis decision theory suggests that people can compare negative events to existing event schemas when assessing the severity of an event (e.g., cancer schemadeath sentence or treatable) The event will seem more severe to the extent that: Event is similar to other severe events (e.g., Exxon Valdez & BP Oil spill; Katrina vs. Sandy) Extent to which there is no prior experience with the negative event (e.g., Hurricane Katrina) Extent that people can imagine a better alternative (or scenario) Events that people perceive as controllable lead to more upward comparisons (comparisons with better possible alternatives) whereas events that people perceive as uncontrollable lead to more downward comparisons (comparisons with worse possible outcomes)
Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 7 Stage 1: Assessing the Severity of the Negative Event: Comparative InformationAlternative Outcomes Expectations People compare their outcomes to a negative event to scenarios they expected or desired prior to the negative event People experience a range of negative emotions in response to a negative event (e.g., sadness, anger, grief) The more expectations exceed outcomes, the more intense the disappointment C on an exam feels worse for a student who expected an A than for a student who expected to receive a C *Crisis decision theory suggests that negative events will seem more severe when people can easily imagine alternative, better outcomes
Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 8 Stage 1: Assessing the Severity of the Negative Event: Information About Consequences 1) Events that are likely to result in negative consequences will seem more severe Woman who awakens to the smell of smoke depends largely on her perception of whether the smoke indicates fire 2) Events that have the potential to bring relatively serious consequences will also seem more severe 3) People perceive events that are highly self-relevant as having more severe consequences (death of close family member more significant vs. distant relative) Events that affect many people or that deeply affect a few people will likely seem more severe than events that touch few lives or make little impact 4) Events that have the potential to cause more damage to a public image will seem more severe
Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 9 Stage 2: Determining Response Options: Controllability of Outcomes vs. Feasibility After people assess the severity of a negative event, they next consider how they could respond to the event: What can I do about this problem? Peoples perception of control over negative outcomes determines the availability of certain response options If negative outcomes are avoidable, people are likely to consider active response options If negative outcomes are unavoidable, people are likely to consider relatively passive response options Limited resources restrict response options by rendering them unfeasible People may be unable to consider the most effective response because they do not have the time, money, social support, strength, or ability required to take the necessary actions (e.g., small business) Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 10 Stage 3: Evaluating Response Options At this stage people weigh the pros and cons of each response option they generated in the previous stage Man diagnosed with kidney failure may avoid thinking about the effort and cost involved in undergoing dialysis if he perceived dialysis as his only viable option (e.g., drinking water) Crisis decision theory suggests that people take three broad considerations into account when evaluating their response options 1Required Resources to engage in a response options: organizations want to use a few resources as possible (e.g., Firestone, Dow Corning breast Implants) 2Direct Consequences of the response in changing the event (e.g., cancer patients surgery) 3Indirect Consequences of the response One criticism of the crisis decision theory is that little attention is given to how people might act in irrational ways Crisis Decision TheorySweeny, 2008 Crisis Decision Theory 11 An increasing number of companies and individuals are using social media outlets to engage the sentiments of their publics, prevent crisis or cope with crises (e.g., rumors) Outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube were among the most utilized by Crisis Communication agents (e.g., Jet Blue) In 2009, Southwest gaged passengers reaction to the emergency landing of a flight in Charleston by scanning Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and websites While monitoring Twitter, Coca-Cola Company found a post from a frustrated customer indicating difficulty redeeming a prize from My Coke reward program Coke posted an apology on the guys Twitter profile (10,000 followers) and assisted guy getting the prize Discuss Bank of America protest and petition Social Media, Chapter 5, Fearn-Banks, 2011 Social Media & Crisis Communication 5Molly Katchpole Protests Bank of America New Fee 4CBS Early Morning: Molly Katchpole Protests Bank of America 2ABC News Tracks Down Bank of America, CEO 3ABC News: Overview Major Step In B of A campaign 1ABC News: B of A, Molly Katchpole, Drop $5 Fee 6B of A Walkout, Guy Mad as Hell and Not Going to Take it Anymore 12 The use of digital technology has facilitated the emergence of new tactics and tools in crisis communication such as the use of web sites, interactive chats, real-time video, or audio files The Internet acts as a catalyst, accelerating the crises news cycle, and giving people a new and viral dimension In this new online age companies need to find ways to avoid or minimize any negative impact of a given issue Must monitor the online world for potential problem issues Corporations must engage influential bloggers by responding to their postings (e.g. Jet Blue) Respond quickly to avoid or limit negative impact Almost impossible to eradicate negative publicity from the Internet, even when a crisis is overweb perpetuates the bad news even after the fact (e.g., KFC)
Managing Crisis in an Online WorldGonzalez, 2010 Social Media & Crisis Communication KFC Responds to Rats at KFC/Taco Bell in NYC Rats Take Over KFC/Taco Bell in NYC 13 1. Bolstering: Emphasizing good traits and/or beneficial past acts in an effort to offset damage from wrong act 2. Minimization: Attempt to portray the wrongdoing as minor and unimportant 3. Differentiation: Suggests that an offensive act should be distinguished from other similar but more offensive acts 4. Transcendence: Attempts to place a misdeed as part of a larger context where more important values would pervade the situation 5. Attack Ones Accuser: Attempt to reduce the accusers credibility, thus reducing the offensiveness and/or plausibility of the accusation 6. Compensation: Offers payment or restitution to the victim of the offensive act
Reducing the Offensiveness of an Event6 Strategies Discuss these in the context of Sears, Dow Corning, and Texaco, Image Restoration Theory 14 Corrective Action Fixing the damage from the wrongful act and/or taking steps to assure the problem never occurs again Mortification Is an apology, an expression of sorrow or regret for the offensive act
Reducing the Offensiveness Image Restoration Theory 15 1. KFC Rats Incident in NYC, 2007 2. Tiger Woods Incident 3. Molly Katchpole, petition on Facebook asking Bank of America to cancel debit card fees
Reducing the Offensiveness of an Event6 Strategies 5Molly Katchpole Protests Bank of America New Fee Social Media & Crisis Communication 4CBS Early Morning: Molly Katchpole Protests Bank of America 1ABC News: B of A, Molly Katchpole, Drop $5 Fee 2ABC News Tracks Down Bank of America, CEO 3ABC News: Overview Major Step In B of A campaign 5B of A Walkout, Guy Mad as Hell and Not Going to Take it Anymore Rats Take Over KFC/Taco Bell in NYC KFC Responds to Rats at KFC/Taco Bell in NYC 16 1. Oreo Cookie 2. Burger King 3. Dominos Pizza
Best PracticesExamples of Companies Using Social Media Well Social Media & Crisis Communication Dominos Pizza Turnaround Oreo Cookie Burger King