HONG KONG UNIVERISITY OF SCIENCE AND

TECHNOLOGY








UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM
(UROP)
SPRING 2013/2014




THE EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE APPLICATIONS
OF TRANSPARENT SOILS



By CHOW Jun Kang











1

Abstract

The objective of this research is to develop a transparent soil that is environmentally
friendly, economical, easy to replicate and feasible in geotechnical engineering modelling.
Fused quartz was selected as the study material in the combination of sugar solution to
create a realistic physical modelling soil matrix. A benchmark of quantification of
transparency was established in order to serve as a systematic approach to grade the
transparencies of various materials available in the market. Hue-Saturation-Brightness
(HSV) format was selected for the presentation of the colour component to measure how
transparent soil alters and scatters the light passing through it. To examine the feasibility
and usefulness of transparent soil, compaction grouting was studied. Several important
findings were presented, i.e. a) the grouting quality is intimately related to the rate of
inserting and pulling out of the grout tube; b) segregation of grout mixture tends to occur
due to different viscosity of the components; c) preferential flow of grout material along
the shaft of the grout tube was observed; d) various stages of grout growth are observed
throughout the experiment. Applying the transparent soil allows researchers to visualize
each stage of grouting to investigate the seemingly unimportant steps that might lead to
unintended failure of the original foundation work. The future work shall continue onto
other important geotechnical engineering processes, which includes jet grouting and pile
penetration processes.
Introduction

Since time immemorial, all of the geotechnical engineering works performed under the
ground, e.g. pile driving, grouting and etc., cannot be directly observed and measured.
The difficulty of visualizing the mysterious world underground, imposed by nature
2

herself, leaves much to desire in regards to the fundamental understanding of soil
behaviors, which is indispensable to the design of foundation. The current practice in the
field, termed the observational method, was suggested by Karl Terzaghi in 1936 for a
workaround, by which he stated that the accuracy of computed results never exceeds
that of a crude estimate (Peck 1969). Since then, the foundations are often designed and
constructed based on assumptions (educated guesses and approximations), and empirical
relationship to that observed in the field. The motivation of studying transparent soil (TS)
is driven by the crucial needs in understanding the particle-scale interactions of soil
which is ultimately related to foundation failures; also, the bustling field of
geotechnology in response to increasing demand of new energy source such as methane
hydrate and megatower for growing population escalate the need to understand
geotechnical construction processes.
According to Mannheimer (1989), transparent slurries can be made by dispersing
solid particles that have a refractive index close to a typical glass (1.4 1.5) in a liquid
with the same refractive index. However, glass beads are not suitable materials in TS
modelling as they do not represent the geotechnical properties of natural granular soil
(Mannheimer and Oswald, 1993; Sadak et al., 2002). Better success has been achieved by
matching amorphous silica powder, silica gel and Aquabead, Nafion with colourless pore
fluid having the same refractive index as described by Iskander et al. (1994, 2002a,
2002b), Gill and Lehane (2001), Sadek et al. (2002), Liu et al. (2003), Zhao and Ge
(2007), Hird and Stanier (2010) and Downie et al. (2012). However, limitations were
reported at the same time as summarized: (i) Silica gel particles deform plastically ever
under low confining pressure (Iskander, 1998; Iskander et al, 2003; Zhao and Ge, 2007),
3

(ii) it is difficult to de-air the internal pores of silica gel particles (Iskander et al. 2002b;
2003), (iii) the presence of air bubbles alters the transparency of TS (Iskander 2010), (iv)
huge difference in refractive index (RI) between container and TS (Ezzein and Bathurst
2011), (v) TS materials are extremely costly (Ezzein and Bathurst 2011). In short, the
core purpose of this research was to develop the environmentally friendly TS with high
stability, non-toxic to human health and chemically inert that is feasible to be applied in
geotechnical engineering modelling.
Material selection
The fused quartz particles are hard, and have good optical transmission and RI of 1.459
compared to that of silica gel. At the same time, fused quartz was found to be a good
material in developing TS as it has the properties similar to granular soil media (Ezzein
and Bathurst 2011). In this project, the fused quartz particles were manufactured by
Lianyungang Fenqiang Trading Co. Ltd, with size ranges 1 to 10 mm.
In combination with fused quartz, sugar solution was selected to model the pore
fluid. Contrary to the liquid and solution used such as paraffin oil, mineral oil and organic
solvents such as toluene and alcohol (Iskander et al., 1994; Zhao et al., 2010), sugar
solution is safe (low toxicity), colourless, stable and odourless. To prepare the sugar
solution of RI 1.459 accurately, RI measurement was taken by Refractometer R5000,
with its accuracy up to 0.001.
Quantification of transparency of TS
Since there is no systematic quantification of transparency of TS has been performed,
effort was taken to measure how TS behaves under different colour background. The
colour component photo captured was then analyzed by software MATLAB. However, it
4

was difficult to quantify how the colour deviated from its original component when it was
presented in the RGB form. Therefore, the colour matrix was transformed to HSV form
(Bunks, 2014), whereby (i) hue (H) is the angular dimension representing the colour; (ii)
saturation (S) is the radius of the circle at particular height of a cone showing how pure
the hue is with respect to white colour; (iii) brightness/value (V) represents how much
light is coming from the colour as depicted in Figure 1. By doing so, it was easier to
observe how many degrees (hue) are deviated as well as the extent of light is being
scattered by the TS.
The setup to quantify the transparency of TS is shown in Figure 2. To minimize
the disturbance of light by scattering, bending, reflection and refraction, flat, thin and
transparent container made of acrylic glass with RI value of 1.490-1.492 was used. Also,
lighting was provided to prevent the formation of shadow upon photo taking and video
recording. To investigate the transparency of TS under different background colour, four
colour red (R), green (G), blue (B) and white (W) were selected, with four sets of
condtions: (i) C container only; (ii) CQ container filled with fused quartz only; (iii)
CS Container filled with sugar solution only and (iv) CSQ container filled with fused
quartz and sugar solution. As shown in Figure 3, the hue value of blue colour for four
conditions are highest among the other colour, indicating blue in the visible light region
having higher frequency compared to red and green, thus allowing it to penetrate the TS
the most. Since there is no reference or benchmark to calculate how the final colour
deviates from its original, an equation calculating the index of transparency, I , for a
particular colour is proposed as follows:
5

3 /
2 2 2
|
|
.
|

\
|

+
|
|
.
|

\
|

+
|
|
.
|

\
|

=
C CQ
C CSQ
C CQ
C CSQ
C CQ
C CSQ
V V
V V
S S
S S
H H
H H
I
where H, S and V represent hue, saturation and brightness respectively, and the subscript
C, CQ and CSQ represent different kind of condition as mentioned above.
Grouting modelling
To determine the feasibility of TS in geotechnical modelling, grouting process was
modelled to observe the internal growth mechanism. Compaction and jet grouting were
modelled by using syringe and brass tube as grout tube respectively in drilling
compaction grouting hole and pumping grout material (gypsum) into the container.
The whole process of grouting was summarized in Figure 4. Based on the
observation, grout mixture was initially injected downwards. However, part of the grout
tended to segregate and disperse into the solution in the sense of the gypsum and water
were not mixed well. Next, the preferential flow changed to the upwards direction along
the shaft as soon as the grout injection started.
In addition, localized shear and stress was believed to have been induced as the
grout tube was pulled out. The grout surrounding the shaft tended to contract as shown in
Figure 9(e) (h). This illustrates the importance of the rate applied to the grout tube
pulling or inserting during the process as such seemingly unimportant step might defeat
the original purpose of strengthening the ground. All these phenomena have never been
visualized as everything under the ground is opaque but TS has shown its ability in
allowing researchers to understand and re-examine the fundamental behavior of soils.
Therefore, it is crucial to investigate and understand how each geotechnical construction
5
6

process alters the soil behaviors that might potentially lead to catastrophic failure in
foundation design.
Summary and Conclusion
What we assume to have happened is not always what happens in reality. In fact, internal
behavior of soil is not as simple as what we think; guesswork remains guesswork. As
shown in this project, visually monitoring each process in grouting is important to
understand whether there are hidden potential in current practices in leading to the grout
failure. There is no way for us to escape from understanding the fundamental behavior of
soil and its mechanism. In addition, rise in the demand in geotechnical engineering field
such as energy extraction under marine and foundation design of high-rise buildings even
makes the study of soil behaviors more crucial.
Transparent soil turns out to be a timely research to allow geotechnical
researchers to study, observe, and re-examine the principles and mechanisms of soil
behaviors. In order to popularize TS application, robust techniques in material
preparation and quantification have to be achieved and in the meanwhile the objectives of
developing TS with the characteristics of environmentally friendly, non-hazardous to
human health, chemically resistant and easy to be prepared. Then, this technique can be
expanded to many other geotechnical applications modelling, including jet grouting, pile
penetration processes and bridge scouring. Although there are still many parameters to be
verified, the success of TS reported here in modelling geotechnical applications shall
ultimately lead to the greater success at illuminating the internal yet fundamentally
important behavior of soil.

0

1
8
0

R
G
B
0
H
S
V
Saturation
B
r
i
g
h
t
n
e
s
s

(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 1. Presentation of colour scheme: (a) Colour presentation by RGB Cube (R-red, G-
green, B-blue); (b) Colour presentation by HSV Cone (H-hue, S-saturation, V-brightness);
(c) Presentation of HSV hue scale.

Lighting
Container
Background
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. Quantification of transparency of TS under different colour background: (a) a
view of setup for quantification of transparency of TS; (b) Presentation of result for white
background.

(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3. Result of quantification of TS under different colour background: (a)
Presentation of result for red background; (b) Presentation of result for green background;
(c) Presentation of result for blue background.


Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
Front Side Top
t =0.00 s
t =11.95 s
t =23.91 s
t =39.85 s
t =0.00 s
t =0.60 s
t =1.80 s
t =2.40 s
t =3.00 s
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Figure 4. Compaction grouting modelling: Observation of grout injection at (a) 0.00s; (b)11.95s; (c)
23.91s; (d) 39.75s and pulling out grout tube (syringe) at (e) 0.0s; (f) 1.80s; (g) 2.40s and (h) 3.00s
Reference

Bunks, C (2014). 5.2 The HSV Colorspace. URL:
http://www.dig.cs.gc.cuny.edu/manuals/Gimp2/Grokking-the-GIMP-v1.0/node51.html.
Downie, H., Holden, N., Otten, W., Spiers, A.J., Valentine, T.A., Dupuy, L.X. (2012)
Transparent soil for imaging the rhizosphere. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44276.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044276.
Ezzein, F.M. and Bathurst, R.J. (2011). A transparent sand for geotechnical laboratory
modeling, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34(6).
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, Matthew (2011). The Feynman Lectures on Physics
Volume II mainly electromagnetism and matter, Basic Books; Slp edition.
Gill, D. R. and Lehane, B. M. (2001). An Optical Technique for Investigating Soil
Displacement Patterns, Geotech. Test. J., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 324329.
Iskander, M., Lai, J., Oswald, C., Mannheimer, R. (1994). Development of a Transparent
Material to Model the Geotechnical Properties of Soils, Geotech. Test. J., Vol. 17, No. 4,
pp. 425433.
Iskander, M., Liu, J., Sadek, S. (2002a). Transparent Amorphous Silica to Model Clay, J.
Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 262273.
Iskander, M., Sadek, S., Liu, J., (2002b) Optical Measurement of Deformation using
Transparent Silica Gel to Model Sand, Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech., Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.
1326.
Iskander, M., Liu, J., and Sadek, S.( 2003) Modeling 3D Flow and Soil Structure Interaction
using Optical Tomography, Final Report, NSF Project No. CMS 9733064, p. 280.
Iskander, M. (2010). Modeling with Transparent Soils, Visualizing Soil Structure Interaction
and Multiphase Flow, Non intrusively, Springer, New York, p. 331.
Kuwano, R., Suwal, L.P., Beltran-Galvis, A.L. (2011). Change of physical and mechanical
properties of sandy soil due to repeated water infiltration, IOS Press.
Liu, J., Iskander, M., Sadek, S. (2003). Consolidation and Permeability of Transparent
Amorphous Silica, Geotech. Test. J., Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 390401.
Mannheimer R.J., Park J.T., Grimley T.A., and Morrow T.B. (1989). Development and
characterization of transparent slurries for basic and applied research in solids transport,
Fluid Engineering: Korea-U.S. progress.
Mannheimer, R. and Oswald, C., 1993, Development of Transparent Porous Media with
Permeabilities and Porosities Comparable to Soils, Aquifers, and Petroleum Reservoirs,
Ground Water Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 781788.
Peck, R.B (1969). Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil
mechanics, Geotechnique, 19, No. 2, pp. 171187.
Pixel and Poly (2014). IOR Index of refraction values. URL:
http://www.pixelandpoly.com/ior.html.
Sadek, S., Iskander, M., and Liu, J. (2002). Geotechnical Properties of Transparent Silica,
Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 111124.
Zhao, H., Ge., L., Luna, R. (2010). Low viscosity pore fluid to manufacture transparent soil.
Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 33(6).

18