- AT&T applied to construct a 101-foot monopole on property owned by Sligo Baptist Church in Silver Spring, Maryland to improve wireless coverage.
- The tower coordinator reviewed options for co-locating on existing structures but found none in the vicinity that would meet AT&T's coverage needs.
- While the monopole would be visible to some neighboring residences, trees are expected to screen it from many views. The coordinator recommended approval with conditions around considering a disguised design if residents object and allowing for fewer than three carriers given the site's location.
- AT&T applied to construct a 101-foot monopole on property owned by Sligo Baptist Church in Silver Spring, Maryland to improve wireless coverage.
- The tower coordinator reviewed options for co-locating on existing structures but found none in the vicinity that would meet AT&T's coverage needs.
- While the monopole would be visible to some neighboring residences, trees are expected to screen it from many views. The coordinator recommended approval with conditions around considering a disguised design if residents object and allowing for fewer than three carriers given the site's location.
- AT&T applied to construct a 101-foot monopole on property owned by Sligo Baptist Church in Silver Spring, Maryland to improve wireless coverage.
- The tower coordinator reviewed options for co-locating on existing structures but found none in the vicinity that would meet AT&T's coverage needs.
- While the monopole would be visible to some neighboring residences, trees are expected to screen it from many views. The coordinator recommended approval with conditions around considering a disguised design if residents object and allowing for fewer than three carriers given the site's location.
APPLICATION NUMBER: 201403-15 DATE: 7 February 2014
Application Information: Applicant: AT&T Description: Construct a 101-high monopole and attach twelve panel antennas, three 72 high and nine 92 high, at the 97 level.
Site Location: Sligo Baptist Church 1610 Dennis Avenue, Silver Spring
Property Owner: Sligo Baptist Church, Inc. Classification in accordance with Zoning Ordinance: R-60 Private Property: Public Property:
By right: Mandatory Referral: Minor Modification Special Exception: Special Exception Modification: Impact on land-owning agency: N/A Existing or future public safety telecommunications facilities and plans: N/A
Co-location options: Based on our review of the TFCG database and our site visit, we do not find that there are any existing structures to which AT&T could attach their antennas in the vicinity of this property and meet their coverage objective. T-Mobile filed an application in 2009 to construct a monopole on MCPS property at Sligo Middle School but it was never constructed. Implications to surrounding area: The MCAtlas image on the left below shows the property (circled) and vicinity. The image on the right shows the approximate location proposed for the monopole (circled) on the property.
The church is located on a wooded lot amid a residential area alongside a storm water retention pond to the west. Sligo Creek Park, which includes the Anacostia Tributary Trail, is further to the east.
2/4/09 The panorama photo below shows a view of the homes directly across Dennis Avenue from the church and their view of the monopole (indicated by the arrow to the right in the photo).
The photo below on the left shows the townhomes across the stormwater retention pond from the church. The photo on the right shows a view of the monopole (approximate height and location indicated by the arrow) from the townhomes. The tall trees will likely screen the monopole from view for some residents to the east and south of the site. Other views may be diminished by the distance of the homes from the monopole.
Based on the plans the location of the monopole on the property appears to meet all setback requirements including the 300 distance from the nearest dwelling.
Based on the location for the monopole amid a forested area, a tree disguise could minimize any resident oppositon to the appearance of the monopole in the community. We asked the applicant if AT&T considered disguising the monopole as a tree to better blend in with the surroundings. AT&T replied that it had neither considered a tree disguise nor had the landlord expressed an interest in an alternative design. We condition our recommendation on AT&T considering a tree disguise if there are community objections to the appearance of the monopole. Attachments: Application Comments: The AT&T engineer states that these antennas are needed to improve coverage between existing adjacent AT&T sites; along Dennis Avenue, Sligo Creek Parkway, and the surrounding roadways; and to residents in the surrounding neighborhoods.
AT&T provided RF maps illustrating coverage from existing antenna sites with and without the proposed new monopole at the church and also with antennas at the 80 and 60 level. Based on our review of the map of existing coverage, the AT&T signals in the vicinity of the proposed location for the monopole are below the target levels of -82 dBm. Antennas as proposed at the 97 level above ground are shown to be able to meet the stated coverage objective. Based on the maps, coverage with antennas below that level will not likely meet the stated objectives. The maps indicate that with the antennas at the lower elevation, the 2/4/09 coverage area at the target signal levels becomes very small around the church property. The trees, especially when in full foliage, will also likely diminish propagation of the signals across the vicinity. Consequently, antennas at the lower elevation will not provide reliable service between the adjacent AT&T sites. We agree that antennas at least at the 97 height above ground are required to meet the coverage objective. Antennas below that level may not provide the intended signal levels to neighborhoods east of Sligo Creek and west of Georgia Avenue to permit reliable service connections and links with the adjacent AT&T antenna sites.
AT&Ts equipment will be placed in a 12 x 12 shelter along with an emergency power generator on a concrete pad to be constructed in a 25 x 30 area enclosed within a chain link fence at the base of the monopole. The plans show that neither the monopole nor the ground space around the base of the monopole is designed to accommodate antennas and equipment from two additional carriers as required by the County Zoning Ordinance, Section 59-G-2.58 (5)(B) states that The Board may approve a support structure holding less than 3 telecommunications carriers if: the Board decides that construction of a lower support structure with fewer telecommunications carriers will promote community compatibility. A shorter monopole will minimize the impact of the facility in the community. Because the equipment area is amid a wooded area, the equipment area will be screened from view.
Tower Coordinator Recommendation: Recommended: Recommended with Conditions: Not Recommended: Conditions: On approval by the Board of Appeals for a special exception to permit the monopole in a residential zone, and on a design that does not meet the requirements to provide for co-location of at least two additional carriers facilities at the site. Additionally, we condition our recommendation on AT&T considering a tree disguise design for the monopole if there is community objection to the appearance of the monopole in the community. 3/27/14
Signature Date
Attachment 1 Revised 3/18/03
Applicant Name: AT&T Mobility
DBA:
Address: 10015 Old Columbia Rd, Suite F-100, Columbia, MD 21046
Contact Person and Phone No.: Phil Stetler, 443-977-7561
Provide a description of the proposed installation, including the type and height of the structure (i.e. monopole, rooftop, water tank, guyed tower, self-support tower, etc.) and whether it is existing, modified, or new. Describe any modifications that will be made to existing structure. AT&T proposes to install a new 101 monopole with 11-5x 12-0 shelter and generator within a 25x30 fenced compound at the tower base. AT&T will also install twelve (12) panel antennas at the 97 RAD center on the monopole.
Address/City: 1610 Dennis Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20902
Frequency bands to be used: 734-740; 740-746; 869.04-879.99; 890.01-891.48; 1950-1965; 1985-1990 (TX), 704- 710; 710-716; 716-722; 824.04-834.99; 845.01-846.48; 1870-1885; 1905-1910 (RX)
Maximum Effective Radiation Power (ERP): 57.2 dBm
Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Emission Designator: 30M0W7D FCC Antenna Structure Registration Number: n/a
Description of antenna(s), including physical size, patterns, gain and orientation (include copy of spec sheet or drawings): Alcatel-Lucent 3JR52702AAAA (3 panels, 72.7x11.9x12.7) and CCI-HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (9 panels, 92.4x14.8x7.4). Antenna gain: 14.3-17.3 dBi
Describe area to be served by the proposed installation. Attach a map of the general area showing the location of the site. Upon request, attach RF propagation studies showing service area coverage surrounding the proposed site with and without the proposed site. Please see the enclosed RF propagation maps. Provided plans contain a vicinity map, site plan, and zoning map.
Will antennas be installed on an existing structure? no
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND APPLICATION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SITE COORDINATION
DATE: _______________ NUMBER: ____________________ (To be filled in by County) 201403-15 Revised 3-26-14 2 Attachment 1 Revised 8/15/07 If not, describe results of investigation about possible co-location. Include a listing of alternative sites considered and an explanation as to why each possible alternative was not selected. If a site was ruled out because of radio frequency (RF) issues, provide RF propagation maps documenting inadequate coverage: The provided RF propagation maps display the inadequate coverage for the subject site area and justify the need for the new site.
Justification of why this site was selected: please see attached RF justification.
Will site be used to support government telecommunications facilities or other equipment for government use? no
If yes, describe:
Attach a site plan of the proposed facility showing location of monopole, tower, or structure on the property, location of existing and proposed equipment buildings or cabinets, and distance of any new structures or buildings from property lines and other buildings or residences within 300 feet. Clearly identify existing versus proposed facilities by carrier. Also provide an elevation sketch of the structure showing major dimensions, existing attachments, and mounting height of proposed antennas. If a balloon test has been performed, please provide copies of the photographs. Will the antenna installation be in compliance with the maximum permissible RF exposure limits set forth in 1.1310 of the FCC Rules and Regulations? Yes No If the answer is no, please attach an explanation.
Type of compliance study required under 1.1307 of the FCC Rules and Regulations: Categorically Excluded Routine Environmental Evaluation Environmental Assessment
If antennas will be located on a rooftop, please attach a description of any steps that have been or will be taken to prevent the aggregate RF from exceeding exposure limits. N/A
Montgomery County Code, Chapter 2-58E requires applicants to submit a facility location plan indicating the location of every existing telecommunications transmission facility and the general location of facilities that are anticipated to be built in the near future. Has a new or updated plan been filed with the County within the last year? Yes No If the answer if no, please submit a plan with this application.
If an application for an FAA review has been submitted or an FAA determination has been issued, please attach a copy.
Submit the application fee, with a copy of this Application Form, to:
Office of Cable and Communication Services 100 Maryland Avenue, Room 250 Rockville, MD 20850
State the fee category selected for this application and the amount and date paid: Category: _New Site-Special Ex_________________ Fee: $_2500.00 Date Paid: _1/29/14_____________ Check # _7227846
Submit the original and three (3) copies of the application with all attachments to: Columbia Telecommunications Corporation 10613 Concord Street Kensington, MD 20895 Phone: 301-933-1488
9/10/2013 Page 1 Revision 1.3 The CCI Hexport Multi-Band Antenna Array is an industry first 6-port antenna with full WCS Band Coverage. With four high band ports and two low band ports, our hexport antenna is ready for 4X4 high band MIMO. Modern networks demand high performance, consequently CCI has incorpo- rated several new and innovative design techniques to provide an antenna with excellent side-lobe performance, sharp elevation beams, and high front to back ratio. Multiple networks can now be connected to a single antenna, reducing tower loading and leasing expense, while decreasing deployment time and installa- tion cost. Full band capability for 700 MHz , Cellular 850 MHz, PCS 1900 MHz, AWS 1710/2170 MHz and WCS 2300 MHz coverage in a single enclosure. Benefits Includes WCS Band Reduces tower loading Frees up space for tower mounted E-nodes Single radome with six ports All Band design simplifies radio assignments Sharp elevation beam eases network planning
Hexport Multi-Band Antenna Array Features High Band Ports include WCS Band Four High Band ports with two Low Band ports in one antenna Sharp elevation beam Excellent elevation side-lobe performance Excellent MIMO performance due to array spacing Excellent PIM Performance A multi-network solution in one radome Applications 4x4 MIMO on High Band and 2x2 MIMO on Low Band Adding additional capacity without adding additional antennas Adding WCS Band without increasing antenna count HEXPORT Multi-Band ANTENNA HPA Antenna Series Model HPA-65R-BUU-H8 www.cciproducts.com Extending Wireless Performance
9/10/2013 Page 2 Revision 1.3 HEXPORT Multi-Band ANTENNA HPA-65R Multi-Band Antenna Electrical Specifications Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (LxWxD) 92.4 x 14.8 x 7.4 inches (2348 x 376 x 189 mm) Survival Wind Speed > 150 mph Front Wind Load 332 lbs (1479 N) @ 100 mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load 193 lbs (860 N) @ 100 mph (161 kph) Equivalent Flat Plate Area 13.0 ft 2 (1.2 m 2 ) Weight (without Mounting) 68 lbs (31 kg) Connector 6; 7-16 DIN female long neck Mounting Pole 2-5 inches (5-12 cm) RET System Weight 5.0 lbs (2.25 kg) Bottom View Antenna Patterns* Rear View *Typical antenna patterns. For detail information on antenna pattern, please contact us at info@cciproducts.com. All specifications are subject to change without notice. www.cciproducts.com HPA Antenna Series Model HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Frequency Range 2 X Low Band Ports which cover the full range from 698-894 MHz 4 X High Band Ports which cover the full range from 1710-2360 MHz 698-806 MHz 824-894 MHz 1850-1990 MHz 1710-1755/2110-2170 MHz 2305-2360 MHz Gain 15.3 dBi 16.2 dBi 17.1 dBi 16.3 dBi 17.4 dBi 17.7 dBi Azimuth Beamwidth (-3dB) 65 61 62 68 64 60 Elevation Beamwidth (-3dB) 10.1 8.4 5.6 6.2 5.0 4.5 Electrical Downtilt 2 to 10 2 to 10 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 Elevation Sidelobes (1st Upper) < -17 dB < -17 dB < -19 dB < -18 dB < -18 dB < -17 dB Front-to-Back Ratio @180 > 29 dB > 28 dB > 35 dB > 35 dB > 35 dB > 35 dB Front-to-Back Ratio over 20 > 28 dB > 27 dB > 28 dB > 27 dB > 28 dB > 28 dB Cross-Polar Discrimination (at Peak) > 24 dB > 20 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB Cross-Polar Discrimination (at 60) > 16 dB > 14 dB > 18 dB > 18 dB > 18 dB > 18 dB Cross-Polar Port-to-Port Isolation > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB > 25 dB VSWR < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 Passive Intermodulation (2x20W) -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc Input Power 500 Watts CW 500 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW Polarization Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Input Impedance 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms Lightning Protection DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground USA HQ: 89 Leuning Street, South Hackensack, NJ 07606 Telephone: 201-342-3338, Canada: 411 Legget Drive, Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2K 3C9 Telephone: 613-591-6696 H1 +45 H1 -45 H2 +45 H2 -45 L +45 L -45 894 MHz Azimuth Elevation 5 1920 MHz Azimuth Elevation 4
9/10/2013 Page 3 Revision 1.3 HEXPORT Multi-Band ANTENNA RET [Remote Electrical Tilt] System General Specification Part Number BSA-RET200 Protocols AISG 2.0 Adjustment Cycles >10,000 cycles Tilt Accuracy 0.1 Temperature Range -40C to +70C Mechanical Specification and Dimensions Housing Material ASA / ABS / Aluminum Dimensions (H x W x D) 8 x 5 x 2 inches (213 x 135 x 51 mm) Weight 1.5 lbs (0.68 kg) Standards Compliance www.cciproducts.com USA HQ: 89 Leuning Street, South Hackensack, NJ 07606 Telephone: 201-342-3338, Canada: 411 Legget Drive, Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2K 3C9 Telephone: 613-591-6696 HPA Antenna Series Model HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Electrical Specification Interface Signal Data | dc Input Voltage Range 10-30 Vdc, Specifications at +24 VDC Current consumption during tilting 120mA at Vin = 24V Current consumption idle 55mA at Vin=24V Hardware Interface AISG - RS 485 A/B Input Connector 1x8-pin Daisy Chain In Male Output Connector 1x8-pin Daisy Chain Out Female Safety EN 60950-1, UL 60950-1 Emission EN 55022 Immunity EN 55024 Environmental IEC 60068-2-1, IEC 60068-2-2, IEC 60068-2-5, IEC 60068-2-6, IEC 60068-2-11, IEC 60068-2-14, IEC 60068-2-18, IEC 60068-2-27, IEC 60068-2-29, IEC 60068-2-30, IEC 60068-2-52, IEC 60068-2 -64, GR-63-CORE 4.3.1, EN60529 IP24 Regulatory Certification AISG, FCC Part 15 Class B, CE, CSA US Ordering Information: HPA-65R-BUU-H8 8 Foot Hexport Antenna with 65 Azimuth Beamwidth with Factory Installed RET Actuators (3) HPA-65R-BUU-H8-K Complete Kit with Antenna, Factory Installed Actuators (3) and M03 Mounting Bracket BSA-RET200 RET Actuator BSA-M03 Mounting Bracket (Top & Bottom) with 0 through 10 Mechanical tilt Adjustment M03 Top Mounting Bracket M03 Bottom Mounting Bracket