is impractical. Searching for other end points of chromosome damage in hematological prep- arations from rodents, we demonstrated that scoring micronuclei in young polychromatic erythrocytes in bone , iarrow smears of mice is a sensitive, simple, and reliable method. [The SCI~indicates that this paper has been cited in over 365 publications.] Mutagenicity Testing Must Be Practical Werner S ch m id Institute of Med ical Genetics University of Zurich CH-8001 Zurich Switzerland J une 26, 1990 Mutation research in Drosophila h ad b een my early field of research between 1957 and 1961. A s an MD I th en turned to cytogenetics and m ed ical genetics. In 1967, wh en claim s were raised ab out m utagenic sid e effects of ph arm aceuticals, m y h elp was sought, and for th e next several years at the University of Zurich I d evoted m uch of m y tim e not to m utagenicity testing but first to working out useful in vivo test system s. Togeth er with G.R. S taiger, I b egan with ch rom osom e analyses in th e b one m arrow of Ch inese h am - sters. Despite a favorab le karyotype (2n =22), such work was not acceptable for toxicological screening. S ince we h ad observed th at treat- m ents with classical m utagens caused severe h em atological effects, I told K. Boiler, 2 a m ed ical stud ent, to analyse h em atologically stained b one m arrow smears. Th e sh ift in proportions of d ifferent cell types proved to be inconsistent and d ifficult to quantitate. In contrast, a number of nuclear anomalies showed a high degree of correlation with th e results of our previous cytogenetical studies. To simplify matters I decided to con- centrate future studies on th e appearance of m icronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes. Micronuclei as a consequence of m itotic ir- regularities were, of course, known to cytol- ogists since th e time of Boven. New, h owever, was the subsequent demonstration that m icro- nuclei in young erythrocytes, after expulsion of th e m ain nucleus, were an extrem ely useful feature apt forpractical toxicological screen- ing. Whoever wants to promote a new method sh ould d em onstrate its usefulness; th erefore num erous basic methodological studies were performed, of wh ich I wish to m ention only two: B . Matter and 13 compared the test in six m am m alian species and sh owed th at th e lab oratory m ouse was h igh ly suitab le. Ten model mutagens, not only clastogens, but spind le poisons as well, were evaluated b y P. Maier and me. 4 B efore directing m y research interests, in th e m id -1970s, to oth er field s, I concentrated on explaining and meticulously describing the test. In th e b eginning, we m et with m uch criticism and scepticism on th e part of cyto- geneticists and m utation specialists b ut were greeted with enth usiasm b y toxicologists who finally saw a light in their difficult task. In other circles, scepticism gave way to innum erab le m od ifications and applications of scoring micronuclel in all kind s of cell types and th eues, includ ing human cells from precancerous and cancerous lesions. In toxicology th e test was successfully automated.~An overview of over 3 3 kinds of applications of micronuclei scoring was pub lish ed in 1989. , 1 CC/NUMBER 3 5 This Weeks Citation Classic a A UGUS T 27, 1990 Schmid W. The micronucleus test. Mutat. Res. 31:9-15. 1975. [Division of Medical Genetics, Department ofPediatrics, University of Zurich, Switzerland] I. Scbmid W&Stalger G R. Chromosome studies on bone marrow from Chinese hamsters treated with benzodiazepine tranquillizers and cyclophosphamide. Muter. Res. 7:99-108, 1969. (Cited 140 times.) 2. Boiler K & Sdsmld W. Chemiache Mutagenese beim SSuger. Das Knochenmark des Chinesischea Hamsters als in vivo- Testsystem. Hamatolologische Befunde each Behandlungmit Trenimon (Chemical mutagenesis in mammals. The bone marrow of Chinese hamsters as an in vivo test system. Hematologicevidence after treatment with tremmon). Hum. Genet. 11:35-54. 1970. (Cited 60 times.) 3. Matter B &Sdmsid W. Treuimon-istduced chromosomal damage in bone-marrow cells ofsix mammalian species, evaluated by the micronucleus test. Muter. Rca. 12:417-25, 1971. (Cited 110 times.) 4. Mater P & Sdinild W. Ten model mutagens evaluatedby the micronucleus test. Muter. Res. 40:325-38, 1976. (Cited 95 times.) 5. Romagna F &Staniforth C B. The automatedbone marrow micronucleus test. Murat. Rcs. 213:91-104, 1989. 6. Arlett C F, Aibby j. FIelder R J &Scott D. Micronuclei: origins, applications and methodologiesa workshop sponsored by the Health and Safety Executive held in Manchester, May 23-25, 1988. Muragenesis 4:482-5. 1989. 20 19~Ob y S I C U RRE N T C O N TE N TS