This document provides an overview of topics and questions to be covered in a seminar on instituting proceedings and summary/default judgments. It includes required readings from textbooks and legislation. Questions cover circumstances for obtaining a default judgment, setting aside a default judgment, problems with the default system, the process for summary judgment applications, amending pleadings, principles governing amendments/adjournments, requirements for establishing abuse of process, how delay can constitute abuse, and whether a legal representative can be involved in abuse of process based on a case summary and judgment.
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 25, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, New York Telephone Company, Intervenor, 396 F.2d 591, 2d Cir. (1968)
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study
This document provides an overview of topics and questions to be covered in a seminar on instituting proceedings and summary/default judgments. It includes required readings from textbooks and legislation. Questions cover circumstances for obtaining a default judgment, setting aside a default judgment, problems with the default system, the process for summary judgment applications, amending pleadings, principles governing amendments/adjournments, requirements for establishing abuse of process, how delay can constitute abuse, and whether a legal representative can be involved in abuse of process based on a case summary and judgment.
Original Description:
Civil Procedure and Arbitration week 3 content notes
This document provides an overview of topics and questions to be covered in a seminar on instituting proceedings and summary/default judgments. It includes required readings from textbooks and legislation. Questions cover circumstances for obtaining a default judgment, setting aside a default judgment, problems with the default system, the process for summary judgment applications, amending pleadings, principles governing amendments/adjournments, requirements for establishing abuse of process, how delay can constitute abuse, and whether a legal representative can be involved in abuse of process based on a case summary and judgment.
This document provides an overview of topics and questions to be covered in a seminar on instituting proceedings and summary/default judgments. It includes required readings from textbooks and legislation. Questions cover circumstances for obtaining a default judgment, setting aside a default judgment, problems with the default system, the process for summary judgment applications, amending pleadings, principles governing amendments/adjournments, requirements for establishing abuse of process, how delay can constitute abuse, and whether a legal representative can be involved in abuse of process based on a case summary and judgment.
Topic: Instituting Proceedings/ Summary and Default Judgment
Required reading for this seminar: Colbran textbook pp 53!! and chapter "# pages 5535$%& 'C(R (art "3 on summar) *udgment+ (art "! on default *udgment+ part "$ on amendment Civil Procedure Act 2005 ,-.W/ ss 5!50+ s !% and s $$& 1ook up Ashby v Commonwealth of Australia ,no %/ 2#3"#4 5C6 "%"" 2"0#42#3#4 7see question ,5/ belo8& 9uestions 1) Under what circumstances could you obtain a default *udgement under UCP Pt 1!" #n what grounds could a default $udgment be set aside" %ow would you go about doing this" National Australia Bank Ltd v Singh, Mearns v Willoughby Community Preschool Inc &hat are the 'roblems inhibiting defendants with the o'eration of the default system! (Colbran p 55: ff/ )) In an a''lication for summar) *udgement what is the 'rocess" See "lover v #oche *)++,- .C/SC 10 (Colbran ' 121ff)3 Consider the situation where summary $udgement is sought on the basis of limitation issues" UCP Pt 1, Cubillo v Common$ealth (1000) 1!, .4 ,01 (Colbran Ch 1+ ' 125 ff) ,) In what manner and at what stage of 'roceedings could you see6 to ha7e pleadings amended" &hat general 'rinci'les go7ern the e8ercise of the courts discretion to 'ermit an amendment or an ad$ournment" %ueensland v &L 'oldings Pty Ltd (1002) 191 .4 ,1, &hat is the effect of the decision in Aon #isk Services Australia Limited v Australian National (niversity *)++0- %C. )2 and Cement Australia Pty Ltd v ACCC ()+1+) )2, .4 1923 Com'are these cases to the decision in Sali v SPC Ltd3 (Colbran p 53 ff/ /he general 'rinci'le which go7erns 'leading amendments is that of o7erriding 'ur'ose (/:;/<##= 'g 1+)3 /he o7erriding 'ur 9) &hat are the re>uirements for establishing the procedure of an abuse of process" Williams v S)aut* (Colbran ' 159 ff)3 %ow can dela) constitute an abuse of 'rocess" Batistatos v #oads and +ra,,ic Authority o, NSW (Colbran ' 150 ff) 1) ead the summary of the $udgment of ares J in Ashby v Common$ealth o, Australia (no 9) *)+1)- ?C. 1911(1) December )+1)) and 'aragra'hs *15)-@ *)+)-3 Can a legal representati;e be in;ol;ed in an abuse of process< &as Williams v S)aut* a''lied in this case" (see 'aragra'hs *1),-@*1)9-)
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 25, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, New York Telephone Company, Intervenor, 396 F.2d 591, 2d Cir. (1968)
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study