This document provides a checklist for calculating damages from a breach of contract. It addresses whether the contract has a damages clause, how to calculate the benefit of the bargain if not, whether the elements of calculation are foreseeable, and whether any elements could have been avoided. It also discusses alternative remedies to consider such as reliance interest, restitution interest, and specific performance.
This document provides a checklist for calculating damages from a breach of contract. It addresses whether the contract has a damages clause, how to calculate the benefit of the bargain if not, whether the elements of calculation are foreseeable, and whether any elements could have been avoided. It also discusses alternative remedies to consider such as reliance interest, restitution interest, and specific performance.
This document provides a checklist for calculating damages from a breach of contract. It addresses whether the contract has a damages clause, how to calculate the benefit of the bargain if not, whether the elements of calculation are foreseeable, and whether any elements could have been avoided. It also discusses alternative remedies to consider such as reliance interest, restitution interest, and specific performance.
The parties may specify the amount of damages due upon breach of contract in a damages clause of the contract. Although U.C.C. Section 2-719 permits liquidated damages that approximate loss, courts will not enforce punitive damage clauses. F NOT, HOW DO YOU CALCULATE THE BENEFIT OF THE BARGAIN? Generally, the court attempts to put the promisee in the position he would have been in had the promise been performed. The plaintif's beneft of the bargain includes both the decline in his position caused by breach and the gains he expected to make on the deal. ARE THE ELEMENTS OF THE CALCULUS FORESEEABLE? To import certainty and stability to the contract regime, contract law excludes speculative and unforeseeable movements of plaintif's economic position from the calculation of damages. Plaintifs cannot recover speculative profts nor unusual damages; defendants cannot reduce the damage award by speculating on the benefts conferred to plaintif through breach. WERE ANY ELEMENTS OF THE CALCULUS AVOIDABLE? To keep economic waste to a minimum, contract law does not award compensation for a particular element of damages that plaintif could have avoided without undue risk, expenses or humiliation. Where plaintif retains exclusive control of the goods or services under contract, he may not increase recovery through unreasonable failure to avoid harm. CONSIDER: RELIANCE INTEREST AS ALTERNATIVE A plaintif who incurs costs in the pursuit of speculative proft may seek remedy for the reliance interest disappointed at breach. Courts awarding reasonable damages made in reliance on defendant's promise in order to put the plaintif in as good a position as never making the agreement in the frst place. CONSIDER: RESTITUTION INTEREST AS ALTERNATIVE In some cases the breaching party may be entitled to the defendant's money to remedy unjust enrichment. One measure of this restitution interest is the market value of beneft conferred to defendant by the plaintif's partial performance of the contract. These plaintif do not sue on the contract but rather by the doctrine of quantum meruit ("as much as he deserves.") CONSIDER: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE INSTEAD When money is not enough to equitably remedy plaintif's disappointed expectations, the non- breaching plaintif may demand that defendant perform as specifed in the contract or that the court impose an injunction against defendant behavior destructive to plaintif.