This document provides an evaluation rubric for group case study presentations. It evaluates presentations on various criteria such as identifying and analyzing the main issues, providing effective solutions or strategies, linking to course readings and additional research, delivery and enthusiasm, use of visuals, involvement of the class through questions and activities, and response to class queries. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to evaluate the presentation as excellent, good, fair or poor. It also notes that group marks will be given for content while individual marks will be given for presentation based on peer ratings.
This document provides an evaluation rubric for group case study presentations. It evaluates presentations on various criteria such as identifying and analyzing the main issues, providing effective solutions or strategies, linking to course readings and additional research, delivery and enthusiasm, use of visuals, involvement of the class through questions and activities, and response to class queries. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to evaluate the presentation as excellent, good, fair or poor. It also notes that group marks will be given for content while individual marks will be given for presentation based on peer ratings.
This document provides an evaluation rubric for group case study presentations. It evaluates presentations on various criteria such as identifying and analyzing the main issues, providing effective solutions or strategies, linking to course readings and additional research, delivery and enthusiasm, use of visuals, involvement of the class through questions and activities, and response to class queries. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to evaluate the presentation as excellent, good, fair or poor. It also notes that group marks will be given for content while individual marks will be given for presentation based on peer ratings.
1. CONTENT Parameters ar!s E"cellent #$%&'1%%&( Goo) #*%& to $%&( +air #,%& to *%&( Poor #% to ,%&( -)enti.ication o. t/e ain -ssues0Problems 3 Identifies & understands all of the main issues in the case study Identifies and Understands most of the main issues in the case study Identifies and Understands some of the issues in the case study Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study Anal1sis o. t/e -ssues 5 Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues Thorough analysis of most of the issues Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the Incomplete analysis of the issues Comments on e..ective solutions0strate2ies #T/e solution ma1 be in t/e case alrea)1 or 3ro3ose) b1 1ou( 15 Well documented, Reasoned and pedagogically appropriate comments on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case study ppropriate, well Thought out comments a!out solutions, or proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study Superficial and"or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study #ittle or no action suggested, and"or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study 4in!s to Course Rea)in2s an) A))itional Researc/ $ %&cellent research into the issues with clearly documented lin's to class(and"or outside) readings *ood research and +ocumented lin's to the material read #imited research and +ocumented lin's to any readings Incomplete research and #in's to any readings Page , of 3 E"cellent Goo) +air Poor Deliver1 an) Ent/usiasm -ery clear and concise .low of ideas/ +emonstrates passionate interest in the topic and engagement with the class/ 0lear flow of ideas +emonstrates interest in topic and engagement with the class/ 1ost ideas flow !ut focus is lost at times #imited e2idence of interest in and engagement with the topic 3ard to follow the flow 4f ideas/ #ac' of enthusiasm and interest/ 5isuals 3 -isuals augmented and e&tended comprehension of the issue sin uni5ue ways Use of 2isuals related to the material #imited use of 2isuals loosely related to the material 6o use of 2isuals/ Sta2in2 3 Uses stage effects ,such as props, costumes, sound effects, in a uni5ue and dramatic manner that enhances the understanding of the issues in the case study Uses stage effects, such as props, costumes, sound effects, in an effecti2e manner to e&tend understanding of the issues in the case study #imited use of stage effects, and"or used in a manner that did not enhance the understanding of the Issues in the case study/ 6o use of stage effects -nvolvem ent o. t/e class: '6uestions 'Generatin2 )iscussion 'Activities 3 %&cellent and salient discussion points that elucidated material to de2elop deep understanding ppropriate and imaginati2e acti2ities used to e&tend understanding in a creati2e manner 7uestions and discussion addressed important information that de2eloped understanding ppropriate acti2ities used to clarify understanding 7uestions and discussion addressed surface features of the topic #imited use of acti2ities to clarify understanding #ittle or no attempt to engage the class in learning Res3onse to Class 6ueries 3 %&cellent response to student comments and discussion with appropriate content supported !y theory"research *ood response to class 5uestions and discussion with some connection made to theory"research Satisfactory response to class 5uestions and discussion with limited reference to theory and research #imited response to 5uestions and discussion with no reference to theory"research 7. PRESENTAT-ON 3 6ote8 1/ .or contents group mar's will !e awarded and then peer rating will !e ta'en to award indi2idual mar's/ ,/ .or 9resentation indi2idual mar's will !e gi2en/ , Page 3 of 3