A CW output detailing an analysis of the language as a retrospective device for absolution, and the manifestations of "the trap" in the story, written by Bernice Castro for her CW 110 (Fiction I) class.
Original Title
The Trap (An Analysis of Language and Entrapment, for CW 110 Sanchez)
A CW output detailing an analysis of the language as a retrospective device for absolution, and the manifestations of "the trap" in the story, written by Bernice Castro for her CW 110 (Fiction I) class.
A CW output detailing an analysis of the language as a retrospective device for absolution, and the manifestations of "the trap" in the story, written by Bernice Castro for her CW 110 (Fiction I) class.
(2012) 32677 BA Creative Writing, CAL An Analysis of Language, and Entrapment The Language As discussed in class, the language in The Trap is very telling of the character who narrates the story. The quality of its narration - the smoother command, the imagery, the buildup - leads to the conclusion that the story is told in retrospect; it tells that this girl, Elisa, is looking back on an event in her life, and the feelings that come with the recollection are that of a woman who has had a longer time to ponder on her actions and emotions. These very feelings permeate the story. As commented during the discussion, this is not the voice of a fourteen-year-old girl. This is the voice of a person more well-versed in the ways the world works. I say this, in relation especially to her descriptions of Mr. Gabriel. In the story, he is described as small and thin and stooped, with a way about him that made him seem even smaller. His eyes laughed even when his mouth did not, and when that happened, the tenderness slipped down the cheeks to his quiet lips. The construction of this description puts a premium on Mr. Gabriels gentleness, his almost tender fragility - and this could be read as a way to present his character as one that does not pose a threat. He is not a hulking predator; he is an almost delicate man, small and thin and unpretentious in his bent angles. In a sense, the narration begs for absolution. The way the language works in The Trap has Elisa telling the story in a way that would permit the reader to rationalize her actions, and then grant her the justification that she needs. Shes not just narrating the story out of a sordid attempt to spice up her present. In parallel to the beginning of the story, where theres an established struggle to fit in and belong, the context from which she narrates this part of her life is punctuated by the struggle to fit in - to be found within society without fault. In essence, she says, Mr. Gabriel was a poor, gentle soul. He was a non-threatening person in a space that overwhelmed me; he was nice, I was young, and homesick for a place that isnt home anymore. Its placating, its imploring. And this is the very language that would force you to look at Elisa and think, Okay, okay, youre forgiven. The Trap The trap, I think, can be discussed on two terms: Elisas, on the bigger level, and Mr. Gabriel, in the end. Elisas whole situation is a trap: the loneliness caused by the change in her environment pushed her to look for comfort (when she didnt find it in the unsympathetic Salud, she looked for a closer source) and compelled her to seek an ally of sorts - someone who didnt pose a threat, who didnt overwhelm her. When she found that in Mr. Gabriel, the consequences were something that she couldnt escape, much like an animal caught in some trap. However, the trap for Mr. Gabriel was the very culmination of Elisas entrapment, as Elisas confession created a different kind of trap for him. Being in a position of power, the blame would have been pinned on him, regardless of what his actions and motivations really are, and the threat of consequence looms over his head. The difference, then, is in how he narrowly (and questionably) escapes this trap: it is not through his own agency, but Elisas. When hed said, Run home, Elisa, she could have easily stayed. She didnt, and thus was he saved.