The document outlines the key factors to consider when organizing a science fair, including planning, distribution of work among committees, implementation of programs, judging, and evaluation. Planning is important and should involve determining objectives, scope of participation, procedures, financing, location and duration. Various committees should be established to divide responsibilities and oversee areas like publicity, reception, awards, and judging. Programs are then organized and volunteers arranged to explain exhibits to visitors. Exhibits are judged by experts according to criteria like scientific approach, originality, and skill. After the fair, its effectiveness in meeting objectives should be evaluated to improve future fairs.
The document outlines the key factors to consider when organizing a science fair, including planning, distribution of work among committees, implementation of programs, judging, and evaluation. Planning is important and should involve determining objectives, scope of participation, procedures, financing, location and duration. Various committees should be established to divide responsibilities and oversee areas like publicity, reception, awards, and judging. Programs are then organized and volunteers arranged to explain exhibits to visitors. Exhibits are judged by experts according to criteria like scientific approach, originality, and skill. After the fair, its effectiveness in meeting objectives should be evaluated to improve future fairs.
The document outlines the key factors to consider when organizing a science fair, including planning, distribution of work among committees, implementation of programs, judging, and evaluation. Planning is important and should involve determining objectives, scope of participation, procedures, financing, location and duration. Various committees should be established to divide responsibilities and oversee areas like publicity, reception, awards, and judging. Programs are then organized and volunteers arranged to explain exhibits to visitors. Exhibits are judged by experts according to criteria like scientific approach, originality, and skill. After the fair, its effectiveness in meeting objectives should be evaluated to improve future fairs.
The organization of a science fair should be a teacher pupil activity
and everything should be though of well in advance .The following factors are to be considered while organizing the science fair 1. planning it is essential that planning is thoroughly done during planning the following aspects should be considered . 1) Objectives of the fair 2) Scope of the fair who could participate in the fair?partcipation to be liited to the school or !ept open to others schools "what types of progras "are to be included etc. #) procedure $) financing %) &ocation" tie and duration ') other factors and facilities( necessary arrangeents control etc. 2. Distribution of wor duties should be arraigned to individuals and groups. various coittees are to be constituted which are responsible for different progras there ay be an advisory coittee" a reception coittee a publicity coittee and various sub(coittees .while distributing the wor! talents and interots should be ta!en into consideration the nubers of coittee governed by the needs of the particular plan for the fair will include the following. 1. )dvisory coittee * any public spiriled leaders will render encourageent and serve as an advisory capacity. 2. +,ecutive coittee* This sall group" coposed of ebers fro each sponsoring body" approve plans" applications developed by the central coittee. #. judging coittee* they secure the judges" assigns judges to the proper areas" see that all e,bihits are judged before being disissed and prepare and present the awards and prizes. $. )wards -oittee* This group secure any prizes certificate or other awards desired by the centre coittee. !." E#$%ution& .rograes decided upon while planning are now to be organized systeatically and put to action .volunteers should be arranged for e,plaining the e,bibits to the visitors. '. (u)ging the fair should be judged by an e,pert tear .seperate criteris are to be developed for judging each ite say. still odel" wor!ing odel" project etc. the /-+0T has listed the following criteria for judging a fair Scientific approach" originality" technical S!ill and wor!anship " thoroughness" draatical value and person al interview . 1) +valuation * when the fair is over " leaders and students should evaluate it and find out whether the objectives of the fair have been achieved or not FACTORS IN *+ANNING A SCIENCE FAIR 1" Ar$a * the territory fro which the enters are to be accepted ust be deterined. 2" Dat$ * The best tie of holding a fair in as last in the school year as possible. !" *ubli%it,& )n annoeceent ust be developed so that students ay be infored as to a!e procedures to be followed. ) centered agency for publicity in newspapers" radio. T.1 and other ass edia. '" T-$ fi$l)s of $ntr,* The division for entries on lower priary" upper priary" high school" higher secondary" and vocational school levels ust be deterined ." *rint$) /at$rial& 2rochures" poster" entry blan!s registration cards" scoring -ard" badges of students" various coittees" teachers" and certificate are re3uired. 0" E#li-it space* the lay out the space allotents in the classroo is very iportant. 1" 2u)ging& The fair is judged by an e,pert terns and separate criteria is used still odel" wor!ing odel and project. CONC+3SION Science fairs ay prove a good platfor foru and eans for the display of all the activities whether foral or infored in nature undergoing in the field of science education in different schools. these also provide healthy coptetion aong the students of different schools. science fairs allow students in grade schools and high schools to tepete in science and others technology activities. REFERENCES 1. www.4oogle serch 2. 5r. T.!.6athew" 5r T.6.olly!utty" science education.
Different Approaches to Learning Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Case Studies from Thailand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Finland