This document summarizes representations made in response to Issue 32 of the Clackmannanshire Green Network Development Plan regarding Policy EA1 on the Clackmannanshire Green Network. Four representations were received from Liz Albert, Muckhart Community Council, SEPA, and Friends of the Ochils. The Planning Authority rejected the modifications requested by Liz Albert around invasive species and biodiversity protections. They acknowledged the point from Friends of the Ochils about greater cross-boundary coordination for the Ochil Hills but did not make any changes to the Plan.
This document summarizes representations made in response to Issue 32 of the Clackmannanshire Green Network Development Plan regarding Policy EA1 on the Clackmannanshire Green Network. Four representations were received from Liz Albert, Muckhart Community Council, SEPA, and Friends of the Ochils. The Planning Authority rejected the modifications requested by Liz Albert around invasive species and biodiversity protections. They acknowledged the point from Friends of the Ochils about greater cross-boundary coordination for the Ochil Hills but did not make any changes to the Plan.
This document summarizes representations made in response to Issue 32 of the Clackmannanshire Green Network Development Plan regarding Policy EA1 on the Clackmannanshire Green Network. Four representations were received from Liz Albert, Muckhart Community Council, SEPA, and Friends of the Ochils. The Planning Authority rejected the modifications requested by Liz Albert around invasive species and biodiversity protections. They acknowledged the point from Friends of the Ochils about greater cross-boundary coordination for the Ochil Hills but did not make any changes to the Plan.
This document summarizes representations made in response to Issue 32 of the Clackmannanshire Green Network Development Plan regarding Policy EA1 on the Clackmannanshire Green Network. Four representations were received from Liz Albert, Muckhart Community Council, SEPA, and Friends of the Ochils. The Planning Authority rejected the modifications requested by Liz Albert around invasive species and biodiversity protections. They acknowledged the point from Friends of the Ochils about greater cross-boundary coordination for the Ochil Hills but did not make any changes to the Plan.
Contents Page - Issue 32 - Clackmannanshire Green Network
1. Schedule 4
2. Representations
Liz Albert (CLDP004) Muckhart Community Council (CLDP174t) SEPA (CLDP142a) Friends of the Ochils (CLDP173a)
3. Supporting Documents
CD083 The river basin management plan for the Scotland river basin district 20092015 - Summary
Page 2 of 3 Issue 32 Clackmannanshire Green Network Development Plan reference: Policy EA1 - Clackmannanshire Green Network (Pages 80-82) Reporter: Body or person(s) submitting a representation raising the issue (including reference number):
Liz Albert (CLDP004) Muckhart Community Council (CLDP174t) SEPA (CLDP142a) Friends of the Ochils (CLDP173a)
Provision of the development plan to which the issue relates: Policy EA1 - Clackmannanshire Green Network Planning Authoritys summary of the representation(s):
Liz Albert (CLDP004) requests additional wording to address the risk of invasive species spreading due to disturbance of ground, construction of new paths, etc. as part of improvement of the green network; and to protect biodiversity, wildlife and sensitive areas when considering new green routes/networks.
Muckhart Community Council (CLDP174t) welcomes the creation of the Central Scotland Green Network and Policy EA1 developing and safeguarding Clackmannanshires Green Network.
SEPA (CLDP142a) support Policy EA1. In respect of our interests, the associated multiple benefits that the green network can deliver is fundamental to the successful implementation of the river basin management plan (CD083) and sustainable flood risk management. The promotion of multi-functional green networks will therefore ensure that complimentary environmental benefits will be considered and delivered as part of the network.
Friends of the Ochils (CLDP173a) are concerned that the Central Scotland Green Network only covers a proportion of the Ochil Hills in the Stirling and Clackmannanshire areas. To overcome this problem, they would wish to see greater co-operation and co-ordination for the whole of the Ochils involving all three local authorities - Stirling, Clackmannanshire and Perth & Kinross Councils.
Modifications sought by those submitting representations:
Liz Albert (CLDP004) requests that Policy EA1 is amended to include a statement that all development of green routes/path improvements should include from the start, monitoring and management plans for dealing with invasive alien plant species; and that a statement that the protection of biodiversity and sensitive areas should always be considered with great seriousness when considering new green routes/networks.
The comments of Friends of the Ochils (CLDP173a) set out a general concern and no specific modification is suggested. Page 3 of 3
Summary of responses (including reasons) by Planning Authority:
The request for modifications proposed by Liz Albert (CLDP004) are not accepted. While invasive plant species can spread along green network corridors there are a range of factors that can influence this and the objector has not provided any evidence that the provision of new green routes and path improvements are any more likely to result in the spread of invasives than any other type of development. SNH is the overall co-ordinating body responsible for invasive plant species issues in Scotland and it has not requested a specific policy on this. The Council regularly monitors the incidence of invasive plant species and, where they are considered to present a significant health and safety risk or risk to biodiversity, takes action to control their spread. It is not considered necessary to introduce any additional policy requirement regarding invasive species through the Development Plan. With regard to the protection of biodiversity and sensitive areas, it is recognised that a balance needs to be found between development and protection of biodiversity. The existing provisions of Policies EA2 and EA3 provide a robust policy basis for protection of biodiversity interests and it is not considered that any amendment is required to Policy EA1 to augment this. No changes are therefore sought to the LDP.
The point raised by Friends of the Ochils (CLDP173a) regarding the fact that CSGN covers only a part of the Ochil Hills, and there is a need for a cohesive strategy involving greater co-operation and co-ordination among all three constituent Councils is noted. As required by relevant Scottish Government guidance, Clackmannanshire Council consults with (and receives counterpart consultations from) the neighbouring authorities on significant planning matters, including the preparation of development plans. The point regarding the need for closer co-operation and co-ordination is noted and will be considered. No modifications to the Plan are considered necessary. No changes are therefore sought to the LDP.