The parties have reached a settlement in principle in the case of Vringo Infrastructure, Inc. v. Belkin International, Inc. and request an extension until September 26th for the defendant to respond to the complaint as they finalize a formal settlement agreement. The plaintiff agrees to the extension to allow the parties to complete executing the settlement in connection with this action.
Original Description:
Vringo has come to general terms with Belkin concerening patent infringement.
The parties have reached a settlement in principle in the case of Vringo Infrastructure, Inc. v. Belkin International, Inc. and request an extension until September 26th for the defendant to respond to the complaint as they finalize a formal settlement agreement. The plaintiff agrees to the extension to allow the parties to complete executing the settlement in connection with this action.
The parties have reached a settlement in principle in the case of Vringo Infrastructure, Inc. v. Belkin International, Inc. and request an extension until September 26th for the defendant to respond to the complaint as they finalize a formal settlement agreement. The plaintiff agrees to the extension to allow the parties to complete executing the settlement in connection with this action.
COMBINED STATUS REPORT AND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT In response to the Court's Order of September 15, 2014, Plaintiff Vringo Infrastructure, Inc. reports that it and Defendant Belkin International, Inc. have reached a settlement in principle. The parties expect to complete a formal settlement agreement shortly. Defendant inadvertently did not file its response to the Complaint by September 12, 2014. Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to extend the time by which Defendant must answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 26, 2014. The parties expect to complete the formal settlement agreement by that time. Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, to extend this deadline as the parties work to execute the formal settlement agreement in connection with this Action. Dated: September 17, 2014 Of Counsel: Gregory S. Gewirtz J onathan A David Alex Solo LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP 600 South Avenue West Westfield, NJ 07090-1497 908.654.5000 /s/ Kenneth L. Dorsney Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726) MORRIS J AMES LLP 500 Delaware Ave., Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 302.888.6800 kdorsney@morrisjames.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff SO ORDERED this _____ day of September, 2014. _______________________________ United States District Court J udge Case 1:14-cv-00961-RGA Document 8 Filed 09/17/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 28
KingCast, Mortgage Movies and BK Judge Ronald Sargis Say Bottom-Feeder Attorneys at Wright, Finlay & Zak Have No Retainer Agreement or Right to Represent Ocwen Et Al. in Raposo Et Al v. Ocwen, Adversary Case No. 15-2095