Defendant BCFA Construction Company, Inc. and its president Arnel Alvarado filed a motion to dismiss the civil case filed against them by plaintiff Felicisimo R. Colas, Jr. for breach of contract and recovery of damages. The defendants argue that: 1) The court does not have jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants because summons was not properly served on the defendant corporation in accordance with the Rules of Court; and 2) The complaint fails to state a cause of action as there are no factual allegations to support the plaintiff's claims. The defendants pray that the complaint be dismissed.
Defendant BCFA Construction Company, Inc. and its president Arnel Alvarado filed a motion to dismiss the civil case filed against them by plaintiff Felicisimo R. Colas, Jr. for breach of contract and recovery of damages. The defendants argue that: 1) The court does not have jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants because summons was not properly served on the defendant corporation in accordance with the Rules of Court; and 2) The complaint fails to state a cause of action as there are no factual allegations to support the plaintiff's claims. The defendants pray that the complaint be dismissed.
Defendant BCFA Construction Company, Inc. and its president Arnel Alvarado filed a motion to dismiss the civil case filed against them by plaintiff Felicisimo R. Colas, Jr. for breach of contract and recovery of damages. The defendants argue that: 1) The court does not have jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants because summons was not properly served on the defendant corporation in accordance with the Rules of Court; and 2) The complaint fails to state a cause of action as there are no factual allegations to support the plaintiff's claims. The defendants pray that the complaint be dismissed.
Defendant BCFA Construction Company, Inc. and its president Arnel Alvarado filed a motion to dismiss the civil case filed against them by plaintiff Felicisimo R. Colas, Jr. for breach of contract and recovery of damages. The defendants argue that: 1) The court does not have jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants because summons was not properly served on the defendant corporation in accordance with the Rules of Court; and 2) The complaint fails to state a cause of action as there are no factual allegations to support the plaintiff's claims. The defendants pray that the complaint be dismissed.
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT PASAY, BRANCH 12 _______________ Felicisimo R. Colas, Jr. Plaintiff, - versus - CIIL CAS! NO. 2"1#PSY For$ Breac% o& Co'(rac( a') Reco*er+ o& ,ama-es BCFA Co's(r.c(io' Com/a'+, I'c., Ar'el Al*ara)o, Presi)e'( Defendant. x------------------------------------------------x MOTION TO ,ISMISS COME NOW, DEFENDN!", b# counsel $n% unto this &onor$ble Court, 'ost respectfull# 'ove for the %is'iss$l of the $bove-c$ptione% c$se upon the follo(in) $r)u'ents* +, -RO.ND" ,!&+" &ONOR/0E CO.R! &" NO 1.R+"D+C!+ON O2ER !&E PER"ON" OF !&E DEFENDN!", 3 /,!&+" COMP0+N! DOE" NO! "!!E C."E OF C!+ON ++, D+"C.""+ON , ".MMON" W" NO! "ER2ED .PON DEFENDN! CORPOR!+ON " MND!ED /4 !&E R.0E", &ENCE, !&+" &ONOR/0E CO.R! &" NO 1.R+"D+C!+ON O2ER +!" PER"ON 3,1, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court provi%es the %ifferent 'o%es b# (hich service of su''ons '$# be '$%e on $ p$rticul$r %efen%$nt, "uch 'o%es 'ust be co'plie% (ith bec$use the '$nner in (hich service of su''ons shoul% be effecte% is 6uris%iction$l in ch$r$cter $n% its proper observ$nce is (h$t %ict$tes the court7s $bilit# to t$8e co)ni9$nce of the liti)$tion before it, 3,3, Where $ %efen%$nt is $ priv$te 6uri%ic$l entit# li8e %efen%$nt /CF Construction Co'p$n#, +nc, "ection 11, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court provi%es th$t service of su''ons '$# be '$%e either on the presi%ent, '$n$)in) p$rtner, )ener$l '$n$)er, corpor$te secret$r#, tre$surer or in house counsel, "$i% provision thus st$tes* Sec. 11. Service upon domestic private juridical entity: : When the defendant is a corporation, partnership or association organized under the las of the Philippines ith a juridical personality, service may !e made on the president, managing partner, general manager, corporate secretary, treasurer or in" house counsel. Retire% 1ustice Osc$r &errer$, (ho is $lso $ consult$nt of the Rules of Court Revision Co''ittee, st$te% th$t ;<!=he rule 'ust be "!R+C!04 observe%, "ervice 'ust be '$%e to one n$'e% in <the= st$tue>xxx n% in the c$se of "ol$r !e$' Entert$in'ent, +nc, vs, &on, &elen /$utist$ Ric$fort, et, $l, the Court succinctl# cl$rifie% th$t, FOR !&E -.+DNCE OF !&E /ENC& ND /R, ;"!R+C!E"!7 COMP0+NCE W+!& "EC!+ON 11 OF !&E R.0E 15 OF !&E 1??@ R.0E" OF C+2+0 PROCED.RE <ON PR+OR+!+E" +N MODE" OF "ER2+CE ND F+0+N-= +" MND!ED ND !&E CO.R! CNNO! R.0E O!&ERW+"E, lest (e $llo( circu'vention of the innov$tion b# the 1??@ Rule in or%er to obvi$te %el$# in the $%'inistr$tion of 6usticeA <E'ph$sis supplie%= ____________________ 1 :13 "CR BCD $lso cite% in /$n8 of the Philippine +sl$n%s vs, "pouses Ev$n)elist$, et, $l, E-,R, No, 15BCC: <3@ Nove'ber 3FF3=G, 5 3,5 +n the c$se $t b$r, there is no sho(in) th$t su''ons ($s serve% either on %efen%$nt corpor$tion7s presi%ent, '$n$)in) p$rtner, )ener$l '$n$)er, corpor$te secret$r#, tre$surer, or in-house counsel, or th$t, $t le$st, efforts (ere '$%e to serve the su''ons upon s$i% persons, 3,C !here bein) no service of su''ons upon %efen%$nt corpor$tion in $ccor%$nce (ith the reHuire'ent of the rules, it follo(s th$t this &onor$ble Court h$s not $cHuire% 6uris%iction over s$i% %efen%$nt7s person, NE+!&ER WERE ".MMON"E" "ER2ED .PON !&E +ND+2+D.0 DEFENDN!" +N CCORDNCE W+!& !&E MND!E OF !&E R.0E", &ENCE, !&+" &ONOR/0E CO.R! &" 0"O NO 1.R+"D+C!+ON O2ER !&E+R PER"ON", 3,B Where the %efen%$nt is $n in%ivi%u$l, "ection B $n% @, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court specific$ll# provi%es the or%in$r# 'o%es in (hich service of su''ons '$# be '$%e, thus* Section #. Service in person on defendant. $ Whenever practica!le, the summons shall !e served !y handing a copy thereof to the defendant in person, or, if he refuses to receive and sign for it, !y tendering it to him. C Section %. Su!stituted Service. $ &f, for justifia!le causes, the defendant cannot !e served ithin a reasona!le time as provided in the preceding section, service may !e effected 'a( !y leaving copies of the summons at the defendants residence ith some person of suita!le age and discretion then residing therein, or '!( !y leaving copies at defendant)s office or regular place of !usiness ith some competent person in charge thereof.* 3,@ s '$# be )le$ne% fro' the fore)oin), the )ener$l rule is th$t su''ons 'ust be serve% to the %efen%$nt in person, +t is onl# (hen the %efen%$nt c$nnot be serve% person$ll# (ithin $ re$son$ble ti'e $n% for 6ustifi$ble re$sons th$t substitute% service '$# be '$%e 3 , +'possiblit# of pro'pt service shoul% $lso be sho(n st$te the efforts '$%e to fin% the %efen%$nt person$ll# $n% the f$ct th$t such efforts f$ile%, : 3,I, "trict co'pli$nce (ith the reHuire'ents of substitute% service is reHuire% 5, .n%er the controllin) %ecisions, the st$tutor# reHuire'ents of substitute% service 'ust be follo(e% strictl#, f$ithfull# $n% full#, $n% $n# substitute% service other th$n b# the st$tute is consi%ere% ineffective, ____________________ 3 &errer$, Re'e%i$l 0$(, p$)e B@:, 2ol, +, 3FFFD !o#ot$ Cub$, +nc, vs, Court of ppe$ls, 3I1 "CR1?I B : Jiester v, N$v$rro, @@ "CR 3F?, 5 Fil'erco Co''erci$l Co, vs, +C, 15I "CR 1?5 !his is necess$r# bec$use substitute% service is in %ero)$tion of the usu$l 'etho% of serviceD it is $ 'etho% extr$or%in$r# in ch$r$cterD $n% hence, '$# be use% onl# $s prescribe% $n% in the circu'st$nces $uthori9e% in the st$tute, C 3,?,-iven the fore)oin) principles, no less th$n the "upre'e Court hel% in .nite% Coconut Pl$nters /$n8 vs, On)pin B th$t 6uris%iction over the person of the %efen%$nt c$nnot be $cHuire% even if he 8no(s of the c$se $)$inst hi' unless he is v$li%l# serve% (ith su''ons, /, !&E COMP0+N! DOE" NO! "!!E C."E OF C!+ON, 3,1F, Ever# or%in$r# civil $ction 'ust be b$se% on $ c$use of $ction I, $s "ection 1, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court %efine%, $ c$use of $ction is the $ct or o'ission b# (hich $ p$rt# viol$tes $ ri)ht of $nother, ? +t is the %elict or (ron)ful $ct or o'ission co''itte% b# the %efen%$nt in viol$tion of the pri'$r# ri)ht of the pl$intiff, 1F ________________ @ C 0$us vs, Court of ppe$ls, 31? "CR BII B :BI "CR 5B5 I 3,11, !o be sufficient, $ c$use of $ction 'ust $ppe$r fro' the f$ce of the co'pl$int, 11 +n the c$se $t b$r, %efen%$nts respectfull# sub'it th$t the co'pl$int is ($ntin) on this p$rticul$r '$tter, $s no contr$ct h$s been execute% bet(een pl$intiff $n% %efen%$nt corpor$tion, 3,13, !here is no f$ctu$l $lle)$tion (hich (oul% support pl$intiff7s cl$i's for 'or$l $n% exe'pl$r# %$'$)es, $n% $ttorne#7s fees, .n%er rticle 331I of the Civil Co%e, 'or$l %$'$)es $re recover$ble onl# in the follo(in) $n% $n$lo)ous c$ses* <1= cri'in$l offense resultin) in ph#sic$l in6uries <3= Ku$si-%elicts c$usin) ph#sic$l in6uriesD <:= "e%uction, $b%uction, r$pe or other l$scivious $ctsD <5= %ulter# $n% concubin$)eD <C= +lle)$l or $rbitr$r# %etention or $rrestD <B= +lle)$l se$rchD <@= 0ibel, sl$n%er or $n# other for' of %ef$'$tionD <I= M$licious persecutionD <?= cts 'entione% in rticle :F?D <1F= cts $n% $ctions referre% to in rticles 31, 3B, 3@, 3I, 3?, :F, :3, :5, $n% :C +n the c$se $t b$r, the co'pl$int is bereft of $n# $lle)$tion constitutive of the fore)oin) c$ses, .n%er rticle 33:5 of the Civil Co%e, pl$intiff 'ust sho( th$t he is entitle% to 'or$l, te'per$te or co'pens$tor# %$'$)es before the court '$# consi%er the Huestion of (hether or not exe'pl$r# %$'$)es shoul% be $($r%e%, s $bove-st$te%, the co'pl$int in the c$se $t b$r is bereft of $n# $lle)$tion constitutive of $n# of the c$ses (herein 'or$l %$'$)es $re ($rr$nte%, __________________________________ I "ection 3, 1??@ Rules of Court ? "ection 3, ibi%, ? 1F 1oseph vs, /$utist$, -,R, No, 0-5153:, 3: Febru$r# 1?I?, +n the c$se $t b$r, the co'pl$int is bereft of $n# $lle)$tion constitutive of the fore)oin) c$ses, R!LI!F 0H!R!FOR!, %efen%$nts respectfull# pr$# th$t the herein co'pl$int be or%ere% %is'isse% on the )roun% of l$c8 of 6uris%iction over the persons of the %efen%$nts $n%Lor for f$ilure of the pl$intiff to st$te $ c$use of $ction, Other Relief, 6ust $n% eHuit$ble $re $lso pr$#e% for, P$s$# Cit#, 31 "epte'ber 3F15, JAIRR!M! M. ILLANU!A Counsel for Defen%$nts ?F /$l$)t$s Ro#$le M$nsions &u'ili%$% "treet, P$s$# Cit# ttorne#7s Roll No, 13:5C +/P No, 5:@5@1LF1-FC-?I P!R No, B3C@F:LF1-F@-FIL P$s$# 1F NOTIC! OF H!ARIN1 /RNC& C0ERJ OF CO.R! R!C-0$s Pin$s Cit#, /r$ch____ !!4, 1EM4 M, 2+00N.E2 Counsel for Pl$intiffs -REE!+N-"* Ple$se t$8e notice th$t the fore)oin) 'otion (ill be sub'itte% for the consi%er$tion of this &onor$ble Court on Fri%$#, "epte'ber 3:, 3F1: $t I*:F o7cloc8 in the 'ornin), S-). JAIRR!M! M. ILLANU!A Cop# furnishe%* JA!MY ILLANU!A Counsel for Pl$intiff ?F /$l$)t$s Ro#$le M$nsions &u'ili%$% "treet, P$s$# Cit# 11 !2PLANATION Copies of the fore)oin) 'otion (ere file% (ith this &onor$ble Court $n% serve% upon pl$intiff7s counsel b# 0/C $n% re)istere% '$il, ")%, 1EM4 M, 2+00N.E2