This document summarizes trends in the content delivery network (CDN) market based on a survey of over 600 customers. It finds that CDN pricing is declining 25-30% in 2014 and expected to decline 35%+ in 2015. While 4K streaming is growing, it will not significantly increase traffic or revenues for CDNs in the near future due to bandwidth constraints. The document analyzes CDN customers by spend, finding most use Akamai, Amazon, or Level 3, and that pricing declines as customer spend decreases.
This document summarizes trends in the content delivery network (CDN) market based on a survey of over 600 customers. It finds that CDN pricing is declining 25-30% in 2014 and expected to decline 35%+ in 2015. While 4K streaming is growing, it will not significantly increase traffic or revenues for CDNs in the near future due to bandwidth constraints. The document analyzes CDN customers by spend, finding most use Akamai, Amazon, or Level 3, and that pricing declines as customer spend decreases.
This document summarizes trends in the content delivery network (CDN) market based on a survey of over 600 customers. It finds that CDN pricing is declining 25-30% in 2014 and expected to decline 35%+ in 2015. While 4K streaming is growing, it will not significantly increase traffic or revenues for CDNs in the near future due to bandwidth constraints. The document analyzes CDN customers by spend, finding most use Akamai, Amazon, or Level 3, and that pricing declines as customer spend decreases.
5/12/14: Content Delivery Summit - Dan Rayburn mail@danrayburn.com Detailed pricing data can be seen at:
www.cdnpricing.com www.cdnlist.com www.contentdeliveryblog.com Note: Data from these slides can be used by anyone but please credit Dan Rayburn at cdnpricing.com Discussion Topics
- Latest vendor additions to the market; M&E activities; earning reports - CDN growth trends; software downloads, gaming and other forms of non-video content - What the telcos/carriers are up to (on-net versus off-net) - Volume customers move to in-house CDNs (not a trend, Apple still building) - Amazon (still underestimated by many, but they do move slowly) - Resellers: Contribute a good % to revenue, but not from telcos/carriers - Media CDN services FINALLY starting to offer a ecosystem platform (Level 3, Verizon, Microsoft Windows Azure) - Quality data: In 2013, Conviva monitored 45 billion streams. 4.8% had video start failures. (1 in 20 did not start) More than 2 in 5 views were at grossly inferior video quality. - The size of the Licensed/Managed CDN market - The real impact of 4K on vendors in the CDN industry
- Latest pricing trends from March 2014 CDN survey
- 4K, also called Ultra HD, is NOT coming to the masses soon, or even in the next few years. - The average Netflix stream across the top 10 ISPs in their ISP Speed Index rating, is delivered at 2.2Mbps - Amazon, Netflix and Comcast have all announced 4K streaming projects, at between 15-20Mbps. All three of them deliver their own content, so CDNs won't benefit from any adoption by these three services. - The latest data from Conviva, which classifies HD as between 1-2Mbps, shows that as a whole, CDNs still have a lot of problems delivering content at 2Mbps, with reliable quality. - A content owner who wants to have 15% of their traffic come from content at 4K will see their monthly bandwidth bill increase by 30-40%, per month. If they want to have 50% of their traffic come from 4K content, their monthly bandwidth bill will increase by 500%, each month - and that's with volume discounts. - The majority of all content owners will not be able to offer a lot of content in 4K. Many, especially those supported by ads, won't be able to offer any, as they their business models don't support it. - Even Netflix has said that they will offer only a "limited" amount of content in 4K (Super HD) for the foreseeable future.
Bottom line: 4K streaming is not going to drive revenue growth for any CDN. If they say otherwise, it's simply marketing. 4K streaming is more than a technology problem, it's a business problem. The Latest On Video CDN Pricing
- For 2013, pricing down 20-25% on average - Pricing decline for all of 2014 expected to be 25-30% - Expect major pricing decline of 35%+ in 2015
- Mobile (tablets) are not a big driver of video traffic (1/4 the number of bits) - Majority of video to mobile is still WiFi, not 3G/4G - Traffic, specifically for video, is not growing like some make it out to be
March 2014 Pricing Survey
- Just over 600 surveys completed in the month of March - All questions specific to video delivery pricing from major commercial CDNs - 15 questions covered pricing, volume, contract length, vendors used, QoS - Data broken out by size of customer, based on contract value THIS IS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE! IT IS ONLY AN ESTIMATE. 32 customers spending more than $1M per year
2014 2012 - 12 customers using Akamai (multi-vendor) - 22 customers using Akamai (multi-vendor) - 15 customers using Level 3 (multi-vendor) - 16 customers using Level 3 (multi-vendor) - 2 customers using Limelight (multi-vendor) - 12 customers using Limelight (multi-vendor) - 9 customers using Amazon (multi-vendor) - 1 customer using Amazon (multi-vendor) - 8 customers using Akamai exclusive - 2 customers using Akamai exclusive - 6 customers using Amazon exclusive - 0 customer using Amazon exclusive
- on average, pricing down 26% this year (2013 was 19%) - on average, customers expect traffic to grow 186% this year (2013 was 126%)
- on average, customers doing 7PB a month, paying low of $0.007 per GB, high $0.02 per GB - per Mbps pricing, dont have enough data, only 4 contracts priced on per Mbps 39 customers spending $500K-$1M per year
- 12 customers use Akamai, 6 exclusive, 6 multi-vendor - 8 customers using Level 3 multi-vendor - 2 customers using Limelight exclusive - 13 customers using Amazon, 6 exclusive, 2 multi vendor - 4 customers using EdgeCast multi-vendor
- on average, pricing was down 20% this year when compared to last year's contract - on average, customers expect traffic to grow 60% this year over last year (*no 2013 data)
*Note: last years survey didnt have a $500K-$1M option in the survey
- on average, customers doing 2-4PB a month, paying low of $0.01 per GB, high $0.03 per GB - per Mbps pricing, dont have enough data, only 2 contracts priced on per Mbps 67 customers spending $250K-$500K per year
- 20 customers use Akamai, 10 exclusive, 10 multi-vendor - 6 customers using Level 3 multi-vendor - 10 customers using Limelight, 2 exclusive, 8 multi-vendor - 12 customers using Amazon, 2 exclusive, 10 multi-vendor - 11 customers using EdgeCast, 6 exclusive, 5 multi-vendor - 8 customers using Windows Azure, 2 exclusive, 6 multi-vendor
- on average, pricing was down 14% this year when compared to last year's contract - on average, customers expect traffic to grow 78% this year over last year
- on average, customers doing 2PB a month, paying low of $0.02 per GB, high $0.05 per GB - per Mbps pricing, dont have enough data, only 1 contract priced on per Mbps 460 customers spending $250K per year or less
- Akamai and Akamai make up 80% of the contracts (including resellers) - Level 3, Limelight, EdgeCast, Highwinds, Internap make up the rest - Windows Azure makes up less than 2%
- on average, pricing was down 10% or less this year when compared to last year's contract - on average, customers expect traffic to grow 40% this year over last year
- average pricing, cant say. too many variables at this level, especially in monthly commits. pricing as high as $0.07 per GB delivered Questions and Additional Resources