This document discusses the negative consequences of Western military interventions in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and proposals for involvement in Syria. It argues that past operations have killed civilians, spread extremism, and destabilized countries. Specifically, the Iraq war resulted in over 500,000 deaths and fueled sectarianism and insurgencies like ISIS. The document urges ruling out further bombing or troops in Iraq and Syria, as such actions will only make matters worse.
This document discusses the negative consequences of Western military interventions in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and proposals for involvement in Syria. It argues that past operations have killed civilians, spread extremism, and destabilized countries. Specifically, the Iraq war resulted in over 500,000 deaths and fueled sectarianism and insurgencies like ISIS. The document urges ruling out further bombing or troops in Iraq and Syria, as such actions will only make matters worse.
This document discusses the negative consequences of Western military interventions in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and proposals for involvement in Syria. It argues that past operations have killed civilians, spread extremism, and destabilized countries. Specifically, the Iraq war resulted in over 500,000 deaths and fueled sectarianism and insurgencies like ISIS. The document urges ruling out further bombing or troops in Iraq and Syria, as such actions will only make matters worse.
This document discusses the negative consequences of Western military interventions in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and proposals for involvement in Syria. It argues that past operations have killed civilians, spread extremism, and destabilized countries. Specifically, the Iraq war resulted in over 500,000 deaths and fueled sectarianism and insurgencies like ISIS. The document urges ruling out further bombing or troops in Iraq and Syria, as such actions will only make matters worse.
short memory it didnt go well. More than half a million people died, millions ed the country and Iraqs infrastructure was devastated. Te operation generated deep resentment against the West. 2) Te current chaos in Iraq including the rise of the reactionary Isis is largely the result of the eight years of that occupation. On top of the trauma of the assault, sectarian division was built into the operation. Elections were organised along communal lines and the authorities used sectarianism to undermine resistance. By 2006, Baghdad had been turned from an integrated, modern city into a patchwork of ruined communal ghetoes. Te open discrimination of the Western- backed Maliki government detonated a Sunni insurgency last year that helped fuel the rise of Isis in Iraq. 3) Bombing always kills and terrorises civilians. Recent coalition bombing raids on Raqqa in Syria have brought death and panic to its residents. One civilian there told western reporters I would not wish them on my worst enemy. 4) All three of Britains major military interventions in the last thirteen years have been disasters. In 2001 we were told an invasion of Afghanistan would rout the Taliban. Tirteen years and tens of thousands of deaths later the Taliban have grown in strength and the country is broken. Te bombing of Libya in 2011 was justied as essential to stop a massacre by Gadda. After it began an estimated 30,000 were killed in a terrifying cycle of violence. Te country is now a failed state with no real government. 5) Te coalition that has been put together for the bombing of Syria apparently in an eort to give the attacks legitimacy comprises some of the most ruthless and benighted regimes in the region. Human Rights Watch reports that nineteen people were beheaded in Saudi Aarbia in August. Qatar and UAE have notorious human rights records that include the use of forced labour. All three have funded violent Jihadi groups in the region. 6) Bombing raids will increase hatred of the west. One of the wider results of the War on Terror has been to spread Al- Quaida and other terrorist groups across whole regions of the world. In 2001 there were relatively small numbers of such militants, centred mainly on Pakistan. Now there are groups across the middle east, central Asia and Africa. 7) Te timing is cynical. David Cameron has recalled parliament to debate an attack on Iraq just two days before the start of the last Tory Conference before the general election. Tis at a time when he is engaged in pushing a right wing, nationalist agenda for party political purposes. 8) Mission creep is almost inevitable. Tere are already more than a thousand US military active in Iraq and senior US military gures are arguing they should now be openly involved in ghting. In Britain a growing number of voices from Tony Blair to Lieutenant General Sir Graeme Lamb are recommending British boots on the ground. 9) Te attack will cost money much needed for other things. One Tomahawk cruise missile costs 850,000, enough to pay the annual salary of 28 NHS nurses. Te US has already red about 50 of these missiles at Isis targets in Syria. It is estimated Britain spent between 500 million and one billion pounds bombing Libya in 2011. Tis was roughly the same as the savings made by ending the education maintenance allowance (EMA); or three times the amount saved by scrapping the disability living allowance. Why we shouldnt bomb Iraq and Syria Please adapt this model letter and send it to your local MP and newspapers: Bombing will make the ISIS problem worse. Along with most British people, we opposed an attack on Iraq in 2003. Te brutal reality of the invasion and occupation conrmed our worst fears. At least half a million died and the country was devastated. Now, less than three years after US troops were pulled out, the US is bombing again. Te British government is considering joining military action, not just in Iraq but in Syria too. All the experience of the varied military action taken by the west in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya shows that such interventions kill innocents, destroy infrastructure and fragment societies, and in the process spread bitterness and violence. While we all reject the politics and methods of Isis, we have to recognise that it is in part a product of the last disastrous intervention, which helped foster sectarianism and regional division. It has also been funded and aided by some of the wests allies, especially Saudi Arabia. More bombing, let alone boots on the ground, will only exacerbate the situation. We urge the government to rule out any further military action in Iraq or Syria. stopwar.org.uk lofce@stopwar.org.uk l 020 7561 4830 Stop the War Coalition Model letter