http://bpmsg.

com AHP 9/28/2014

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)
K. D. Goepel Version 26.07.2014 Free web based AHP software on: http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= Number of criteria (3 to 10) Scale: 1 Linear
N= Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0.1 Consensus: n/a
p= selected Participant (0=consol.) 13 7
Objective
Author
Date Thresh: 1E-07 Iterations: 7 EVM check: 3.5E-08
Table Comment Weights Rk
1 29.0% 2
2 5.5% 3
3 65.5% 1
4 0.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 0.0%
10 0.0%
Result Eigenvalue lambda:
Consistency Ratio 0.37 GCI: 0.24 CR: 8.4%
Matrix
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

1
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

3
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

4
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

5
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
o
n

6
0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Criterion 1 1 1 7 1/3 - - - - - - - 28.97%
Criterion 2 2 1/7 1 1/9 - - - - - - - 5.49%
Criterion 3 3 3 9 1 - - - - - - - 65.54%
Criterion 4 4 - - - 1 - - - - - - 0.00%
Criterion 5 5 - - - - 1 - - - - - 0.00%
Criterion 6 6 - - - - - 1 - - - - 0.00%
0
7
- - - - - - 1 - - - 0.00%
0
8
- - - - - - - 1 - - 0.00%
0
9
- - - - - - - - 1 - 0.00%
0
10
- - - - - - - - - 1 0.00%
for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
question section ("+" in row 66)
normalized
principal
Eigenvector
3
1
1
3.080
Criterion
Participant 1
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
by K. Goepel 245737968.xlsx.ms_office-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 1
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 29%
2 5%
3 66%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1
a:
0.1 CR: 8% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 A 7 7.00
13 1 3 B 3 0.33
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 B 9 0.11
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 3
A
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
B
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Participant 1
Criterion 6
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 2
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 2
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 3
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 4
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 5
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 5
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 6
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 7
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 7
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 8
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 8
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 9
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 9
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 10
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 10
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 6
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 11
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 11
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 12
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 12
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 13
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 13
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 14
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 14
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 15
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 15
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 16
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 16
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 17
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 17
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 18
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 18
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 19
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 19
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
n= 3 Input 20
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
n Criteria Comment RGMM
1 33%
2 33%
3 33%
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
1 a: 0.1 CR: 0% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 1.00
13 1 3 1.00
0 1 4 1.00
0 1 5 1.00
0 1 6 1.00
0 1 7 1.00
0 1 8 1.00
23 2 3 Criterion 2 1.00
0 2 4 1.00
0 2 5 1.00
0 2 6 1.00
0 2 7 1.00
0 2 8 1.00
0 3 4 1.00
0 3 5 1.00
0 3 6 1.00
0 3 7 1.00
0 3 8 1.00
0 4 5 1.00
0 4 6 1.00
0 4 7 1.00
0 4 8 1.00
0 5 6 1.00
0 5 7 1.00
0 5 8 1.00
0 6 7 1.00
0 6 8 1.00
0 7 8 1.00
0 0
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values
7
Very strong
importance
One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
is demonstrated in practice
9 Extreme importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
possible order of affirmation
3
Moderate
importance
Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
5 Strong Importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
another
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 4
A B
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Participant 20
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 3
Criterion 6
Criterion 5
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
245737968.xlsx.ms_office-In20
http://bpmsg.com
AHP
Multiple Input Sheet
9/28/2014
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet
1 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 3 = n number of criteria
C 1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 7 0.333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0.143 0.111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/7 1 1/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
2 1 3 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4 1 5 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6 1 7 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8 1 9 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
10 1 11 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Participant 10 1/0/1900 Participant 11 1/0/1900
Participant 5
Participant 3
1/0/1900 1/0/1900
Participant 7
1/0/1900
1/0/1900 Participant 2
1/0/1900 1/0/1900
1/0/1900 Participant 6
Consolidated Participant 1
1/0/1900
Participant 8 Participant 9
1/0/1900
Participant 4
22 of 24 245737968.xlsx.ms_office-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 3
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 12
1 1.00 7.00 0.33 - - - - - - - 0.83 1.36
2 0.14 1.00 0.11 - - - - - - - 0.13 0.26
3 3.00 9.00 1.00 - - - - - - - 1.30 3.08
4 - - - 1.00 - - - - - - 0.10 0.00
5 - - - - 1.00 - - - - - 0.10 0.00
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - - 0.10 0.00
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - - 0.10 0.00
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - - 0.10 0.00
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 - 0.10 0.00
10 - - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.10 0.00
Sum (col) 4.1429 17 1.4444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scaling
0.64 0.44
0.10 0.08
1.00 1.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
0.08 0.00
2.28 1.53
Normalization
0.24 0.41 0.23 - - - - - - - 0.2817 0.289744
0.03 0.06 0.08 - - - - - - - 0.0424 0.0549
0.72 0.53 0.69 - - - - - - - 0.4394 0.655355
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0338 5.76E-08
Eigenvalue: 3.080299
Check 4E-08 err: 1.0E-07 4.63E-13
http://bpmsg.com
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
Author: Klaus D. Goepel
http://bpmsg.com
Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants
11.12.2012
released
Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified
(new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
5/8/2013
Consensus calculation in sheet Summary adapted to 20
participants, calculation of CR in summary sheet using Alonso.
5/31/2013 In4 cell K17 was not referring to alpha in summary sheet,
cell F17 (weight of individual participants) was partly locked in
input sheets
8/12/2013 Values for different scales are calculated in the input sheets.
Input sheets allow decimal figure instead of 1-9 integer. Sheet
"tables" deleted
12/24/2013 For the 3 most inconsistent judgments the ideal judgment
resulting in lowest inconsistency is displayed
5/9/2014 Change of check for convergence of power method
7/26/2014 corrected wrong ref in multInp (Matrix13)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial
3.0 Singapore License.