Application for Order 05-CA-7205, September 19, 2014
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie, henceforth in the first person, reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, applies to the Hillsborough Circuit Court pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records in Case No.: 05-CA-7205 that are to be destroyed or disposed of.
Application for Order 05-CA-7205, September 19, 2014
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie, henceforth in the first person, reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, applies to the Hillsborough Circuit Court pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records in Case No.: 05-CA-7205 that are to be destroyed or disposed of.
Application for Order 05-CA-7205, September 19, 2014
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie, henceforth in the first person, reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, applies to the Hillsborough Circuit Court pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records in Case No.: 05-CA-7205 that are to be destroyed or disposed of.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH J UDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
NEIL J . GILLESPIE Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Case: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A. and WILLIAM J . COOK, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs. ________________________________________/ APPLICATION FOR ORDER 1. Applicant Neil J . Gillespie, henceforth in the first person, reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, applies to the Hillsborough Circuit Court pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.J ud.Admin., for an Order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records in Case No.: 05-CA-7205 that are to be destroyed or disposed of. Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.J ud.Admin.: (g) Disposition Other Than Destruction. Before destruction or disposition of court records under this rule, any person may apply to the court for an order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records that are to be destroyed or disposed of. All parties shall be given notice of the application. The court shall dispose of that court record as appropriate. 2. The Florida Supreme Court established procedure to grant my application for order in SC11-1622 and SC11-858 that must be followed here under the principal of stare decisis. Stare decisis (pronunciation omitted) is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedent established by prior decisions. The words originate from the phrasing of the principle in the Latin maxim Stare decisis et non quieta movere: "to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed."[2] In a legal context, this is understood to mean that courts should generally abide by precedent and not disturb settled matters.[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent 2 3. The Florida Supreme Court entered an Order in SC11-1622 February 11, 2014. (Exhibit 1), Petitioner has filed an Application for Order on September 30, 2013, requesting that the file for this case, in lieu of destruction, be released to him subsequent to the Court's retention timeline requirement, in compliance with Fla. R. J ud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner's request is attached as Appendix A. All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond. 4. The Florida Supreme Court GRANTED my application in SC11-1622 April 16, 2014. The Order appears at Exhibit 2. There having been no response to this Court's order dated February 11, 2014, regarding petitioner's request for delivery of the court record, and the court having determined that he has complied with the request provisions of the Florida Rules of J udicial Administration, the court approves his application and will surrender this court's file to him in lieu of its destruction. In compliance with rule 2.430(c)(3)(A) of the Rules of J udicial Administration, petitioner shall make appropriate arrangements with the Office of the Clerk no more than 30 days prior to J une 21, 2017, for the transfer of this file. 5. The Florida Supreme Court entered an Order in SC11-858 February 11, 2014. (Exhibit 3), Petitioner has filed an Application for Order on September 30, 2013, requesting that the file for this case, in lieu of destruction, be released to him subsequent to the Court's retention timeline requirement, in compliance with Fla. R. J ud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner's request is attached as Appendix A. All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond. 6. The Florida Supreme Court GRANTED my application in SC11-858 April 16, 2014. The Order appears at Exhibit 4. There having been no response to this Court's order dated February 11, 2014, regarding petitioner's request for delivery of the court record, and the court having determined that he has complied with the request provisions of the Florida Rules of J udicial Administration, the court approves his application and will surrender this court's file to him in lieu ofits destruction. In compliance with rule 2.430(c)(3)(A) of the Rules of J udicial Administration, petitioner shall make appropriate arrangements with the Office of the Clerk no more than 30 days prior to J une 17, 2016, for the transfer of this file. 7. The Florida Supreme Court established procedure to grant my application for order in SC11-1622 and SC11-858 that must be followed here under the principal of stare decisis. 3 8. The Thirteenth J udicial Circuit of Florida was created by the Constitution and Florida Statutes to administer, apply, and interpret the laws of the state of Florida in a fair and unbiased manner without, inter alia, bribery, favoritism, extortion, improper influence, personal self- enrichment, self-dealing, concealment, or conflict of interest. 9. Under Article V, Sec. 2(d), Fla. Const., Chief J udge Menendez [S]shall be responsible for the administrative supervision of the circuit courts and county courts in his circuit.. ARTICLE V, J UDICIARY, SECTION 2. Administration; practice and procedure. (d) A chief judge in each circuit shall be chosen from among the circuit judges as provided by supreme court rule. The chief judge shall be responsible for the administrative supervision of the circuit courts and county courts in his circuit. Under Article II, Sec. 5(b), Fla. Const., Chief J udge Menendez swore an Oath of Office in the State of Florida on August 26, 2008: ARTICLE II, GENERAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 5. Public officers. I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under the Constitution of the State, and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of Circuit Court J udge, Thirteenth J udicial Circuit, Group Nineteen, on which I am now about to enter, so help me God. A copy of J udges Menendezs Oath of Office August 26, 2008 appears at Exhibit 5. WHEREFORE this Court is required to grant the relief requested. RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED September 19, 2014. Neil J . Gillespie, applicant pro se 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala, Florida 34481 Telephone: (352) 854-7807 Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net Certificate of Service I certify that the attached APPLICATION FOR ORDER in Case No.: 05-CA-7205 was served in paper format today September 19, 2014 as indicated to Pat Frank, Clerk of Circuit Court, with paper copies provided as indicated below. Pat Frank, Clerk of Circuit Court Hillsborough County, Florida County Center 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL 33602-4156 VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290607492 Barker & Cook, P.A. 501 E Kennedy Blvd. Suite 790 Tampa, Florida 33602-5258 VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP293500270 Ryan Christopher Rodems Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N Orange Ave. Orlando, Florida 32801-2414 VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP293682682 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED September 19, 2014. Neil J . Gillespie, Applicant pro se 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala, Florida 34481 Telephone: (352) 854-7807 C!Court ofjflorfba TUESDAY,FEBRUARY11,2014 CASENO.: SCII-1622 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 2DIO-5197; 05-CA-7205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK, ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Petitioner'swithdrawalofmotionsfor surrenderoffiles ishereby acknowledged. Petitionerhas filedanApplicationforOrderonSeptember30,2013, requestingthatthefile forthiscase,inlieuofdestruction,bereleasedto him subsequentto theCourt'sretentiontimelinerequirement, incompliancewithFla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner'srequestis attachedas AppendixA. Allparties havetwentydaysfromthedateofthisorderto submit,inwriting,anyobjectionto Petitioner'srequest. Anyobjectionsubmittedmustalsobeservedonallother parties;thepartieswhoareservedwithobjectionshavefifteendaystorespond. ATrueCopy Test:
Clerk,SupretneCourt ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE HON. PATFRANK,CLERK HON. JAMESBIRKHOLD,CLERK 1 ... " SUPREMECOURTOFFLORIDA STATEOFFLORIDA NEILJ. GILLESPIE Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, Case: SCII-1622 LowerTribunal: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK,P.A.and WILLIAMJ. COOK, Defendants/CounterPlaintiffs. ---------------- / APPLICATIONFORORDER ApplicantNeilJ. Gillespie(hereinafter"Applicant"),reluctantlyappearingprosedueto indigenceand/orinsolvency,hereinthefirstperson,appliestothe SupremeCourtofFlorida pursuantto Rule2.430(g),Fla.R.Jud.Admin.,for an OrderrequiringtheClerkto delivertothe ApplicantthecourtrecordsinCase: SC11-1622thataretobedestroyedordisposedof Rule2.430(g),Fla.R.Jud.Admin.: (g)DispositionOtherThanDestruction.Beforedestructionor dispositionofcourtrecordsunderthisrule,anypersonmayapplytothecourtfor anorderrequiringtheclerktodelivertotheapplicantthecourtrecordsthatareto bedestroyedordisposedot:Allpartiesshallbegivennoticeof theapplication. Thecourtshalldisposeof thatcourtrecordasappropriate. NopaTty, personorentityotherthanme filedanythinginthecase. All partiesshownonthecertificateof servicewereprovideda copyof thisapplication. RESPECFULLYSUBMITTEDSeptember27,2013. CertificateofService IcertifythattheApplicationForOrderinCaseNo. SC11-1622intheFloridaSupreme CourtwasprovidedSeptember27,2013 to: HON. THOMAS D. HALL Officeofthe Clerk SupremeCourtofFlorida 500SouthDuvalStreet Tal1ahassee,Florida32399 VIAV.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290801254 Icertifythatacopyhereofhasbeenfurnishedtoeachofthe following: HON. JAMES BIRKHOLD ClerkoftheSecondDistrictCourtofAppeal 1005 E. MemorialBlvd. Lakeland,FL33801 VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP293714825 HON.PATFRANK,Clerkof CircuitCourt CountyCenter 601 E. KennedyBlvd. Tampa,FL33602 VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP291209232 RyanChristopherRodems Barker,Rodems&Cook,P.A. 501 EKennedyBlvd. Suite790 Tampa,Florida33602-5258 VIAV.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290126047 RESPECTFULLYSUBMITTEDSeptember27,2013. ____ . 0- . I. ctourtofjflortba MONDAY, MARCH 12,2012 2213SEP30 PH 1=29 CASENO.: SC11-1622 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 2DI0o97, OS-CA- NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK,ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Thepetitionerhas filedapetitionforwritofmandamuswiththeCourt. To theextentthepetitionerseeksawritofmandamusdirectedtowardsthedistrict court,thepetitionisdeniedbecauseawritofmandamuscannotbeissuedto direct themannerinwhichacourtshallactin thelawfulexerciseofitsjurisdiction. State ex reI. NorthSt. LucieRiverDrainageDis!. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d889,890 (Fla. 1943);seealsoMigliorev. CityofLauderhill,415 So. 2d62, 63 (Fla.4thDCA 1982)(statingthatma:ndamus "isnotanappropriatevehicleforreviewofamerely erroneousdecisionnorisitpropertomandatethedoing(orundoing)ofa discretionaryact"),approved,431 So. 2d 986(Fla. 1983). Totheextentthe petitionerseeksanyadditionalrelief,thepetitionisdismissedasfacially insufficient. PARIENTE,LEWIS,QUINCE,LABARGA, andPERRY,JJ.,concur. ATrueCopy Test:
Clerlc lt Sliprellle kb Served: NEILJ. GILLESPIE/ RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS HON. PAT FRANK,CLERK HON.JAMES BIRKHOLD,CLERK ~ u r t t QCourt ofjflorfba WEDNESDAY,APRIL 16,2014 CASENO.: SC1I-I622 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 2DIO-5I97; 05-CA-7205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK, ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) TherehavingbeennoresponsetothisCourt'sorderdatedFebruary11,2014, regardingpetitioner'srequestfordeliveryofthecourtrecord,andthecourthaving determinedthathehascompliedwiththerequestprovisionsoftheFloridaRulesof JudicialAdministration,thecourtapproveshisapplicationandwillsurrenderthis court'sfiletohiminlieuofitsdestruction. Incompliancewithrule2.430(c)(3)(A) oftheRulesofJudicialAdministration,petitionershallmakeappropriate arrangementswiththeOfficeoftheClerknomorethan30dayspriortoJune21, 2017,forthetransferofthisfile. ATrueCopy Test: ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE WILLIAMJ. COOK 2 ~ u r t t ((ourtofjflorfba TUESDAY,FEBRUARY11,2014 CASENO.: SC11-858 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 05-CA-007205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS &COOK, P.A.,ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Petitioner'swithdrawalofmotionsforsurrenderoffilesishereby acknowledged. PetitionerhasfiledanApplicationforOrderonSeptember30,2013, requestingthatthefile forthiscase,inlieuofdestruction,bereleasedtohim subsequenttotheCourt'sretentiontimelinerequirement, incompliancewithFla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner'srequestisattachedasAppendixA. Allparties havetwentydaysfromthedateofthisordertosubmit,inwriting,anyobjectionto Petitioner'srequest.Anyobjectionsubmittedmustalsobeservedonallother parties;thepartieswhoareservedwithobjectionshavefifteendaystorespond. ATrueCopy Test: ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE HON. PATFRANK,CLERK DAVIDA. ROWLAND HON. JAMESD. ARNOLD,JUDGE 3 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA NEIL J. GILLESPIE Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Case: SCI 1-858 Lower Tribunal: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A. and WILLIAM J. COOK, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs. ---------------- / APPLICATION FOR ORDER Applicant Neil J. Gillespie (hereinafter "Applicant"), reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, here in the first person, applies to the Supreme Court of Florida pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the Clerk to deliver to the Applicant the court records in Case: Sell-8S8 that are to be destroyed or disposed of Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin.: (g) Disposition Other Than Destruction. Before destruction or disposition of court records under this rule, any person may apply to the court for an order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records that are to be destroyed or disposed of: All parties shall be given notice of the application. The court shall dispose of that court record as appropriate. No party, person or entity other than me filed anything in the case. All parties shown on the certificate of service were provided a copy of this application. RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED September 27,2013. Certificate of Service I certify that the Application For Order in Case No. SC 11-858 in the Florida Supreme Court was provided September 27, 2013 to: HON. THOMAS D. HALL Office of the Clerk Supreme Court of Florida 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290801254 I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to each of the following: HON. PAT FRANK, Clerk of Circuit Court David A. Rowland, General Counsel County Center Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Of Florida 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 800 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 603 Tampa, FL 33602 Tampa, Florida 33602 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP291209232 VIA V.P.S. No. lZ64589FP293610866 HON. JAMES D. ARNOLD, JUDGE Ryan Christopher Rodems 800 E. Twiggs St., Room #514 Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. Tampa, Florida 33602 SOl E Kennedy Blvd. Suite 790 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP294570872 Tampa, Florida 33602-5258 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290126047 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED September 27, 2013. QCourt of jflortba WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 2011 CASE NO.: sell-8S8 Si.J?I\[hi.:: l;.JURT Lower Tribunal No(s).: NEIL J. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A., ET AL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy Test:
lOtnas D. HaJI Clerk, Silprellle COlut ab Served: DAVIn A. ROWLAND NEIL J. GILLESPIE RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS HON. PAT FRANK, CLERK HON. JAMES D. ARNOLD, JUDGE ~ u p r ctCourt ofjfloriba WEDNESDAY,APRIL 16,2014 CASENO.: SCll-858 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 05-CA-007205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK, P.A., ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) There11avingbeennoresponsetothisCourt'sorderdatedFebruary11,2014, regardingpetitioner'srequestfordeliveryofthecourtrecord,andthecourthaving determinedthathehascompliedwiththerequestprovisionsoftheFloridaRulesof JudicialAdministration,thecourtapproveshisapplicationandwillsurrenderthis court'sfiletohiminlieuof itsdestruction. Incompliancewithrule2.430(c)(3)(A) oftheRulesofJudicialAdministration,petitionershallmakeappropriate arrangementswiththeOfficeoftheClerknomorethan30 dayspriortoJune 17, 2016, forthetransferofthisfile. ATrueCopy Test: JohnA.T'omasino Clerk,SupremeCoull ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE WILLIAMJ. COOK DAVIDA. ROWLAND 4 OATHOFOFFICE Sl"A'fEOFFLORIDA ,/ -- T "'E . .!..\ - - I . 1do solemnly swear (or affirm) that J will support.. protect, and defend the Constitution and Government ofthe unitedStates and ofthe StateofFlorida; that Iam duly qualified to hold office undertheConstitutionoftheState, and thatJ wi)) welland faithfully perfomlthedutiesof C"IICI ,JJh"m'IJDI.. &A04JI /tIJA/II-rSl)l (Office) onwhich lamnow abouttoenter.sohelpmeGo Type ofIdenl!/ic'alion Produced --- ._...._._....
ACCEPTANCE lacceptlheofficeof c,ltop"" (lM,I\Q,.T ;l\l6GI?# 7H!ICT.#?Al'lH CI )!IAJi!" .' above is the OathofOfficetaken by me.
MailingAddress: 0 Home 621f}ffice Signature: &i. "* 6D::L .. '""3\.. StreetorPost Printnameasyou desirecommissionissued I f FL. 13'0"2-
Joseph C. Sun v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Michelle Allport Lt. Tyndall J. Griswold Ed Hughes Lt. Kolatson Lt. Bailey Anthony Belaski Rick Veach Joy Curry Anthony Boyd J. Lighty P.L. Ferlazzo L.E. Debois, 52 F.3d 338, 10th Cir. (1995)