1. The document summarizes a lecture on autonomy and its relationship to liberty. It discusses the Frankfurt/Dworkin model of autonomy, which defines autonomy as having both competency for self-reflection and authenticity through endorsement of desires.
2. It outlines criticisms of the Frankfurt/Dworkin model, including whether higher-order desires are needed, the risk of infinite regress, and whether manipulation of second-order desires undermines autonomy.
3. The document provides an overview of the ideas that were covered in the previous lecture and readings assigned for the upcoming lecture on paternalism.
1. The document summarizes a lecture on autonomy and its relationship to liberty. It discusses the Frankfurt/Dworkin model of autonomy, which defines autonomy as having both competency for self-reflection and authenticity through endorsement of desires.
2. It outlines criticisms of the Frankfurt/Dworkin model, including whether higher-order desires are needed, the risk of infinite regress, and whether manipulation of second-order desires undermines autonomy.
3. The document provides an overview of the ideas that were covered in the previous lecture and readings assigned for the upcoming lecture on paternalism.
1. The document summarizes a lecture on autonomy and its relationship to liberty. It discusses the Frankfurt/Dworkin model of autonomy, which defines autonomy as having both competency for self-reflection and authenticity through endorsement of desires.
2. It outlines criticisms of the Frankfurt/Dworkin model, including whether higher-order desires are needed, the risk of infinite regress, and whether manipulation of second-order desires undermines autonomy.
3. The document provides an overview of the ideas that were covered in the previous lecture and readings assigned for the upcoming lecture on paternalism.
3. Autonomy Chrls 1hompson c[L68[cam.ac.uk 1 8emlnder of lasL week's lecLure 1. 1he paradox of posluve llberLy 2. non-adapLauon and non-lngrauauon 3. 8epubllcan lreedom 4. ls non-domlnauon enough? 2 8emlnder of lasL week's lecLure lnLerference non-lnLerference Saused ! L.g. Woman ln Saudl Arabla who ls happy noL drlvlng # L.g. CommunlsL academlc ln LasL 8erlln noL Saused $ L.g. nelson Mandela aL 8obln lsland % L.g. Pomeless person A: roblem of non-adapLauon 8: roblem of non-lngrauauon u: roblem for non-domlnauon? 3 Cvervlew of Lhe lecLures 1. negauve and posluve llberLy 2. 1he paradox of posluve llberLy, Lhe problem wlLh negauve llberLy 3. AuLonomy 4. aLernallsm 3. 1he value of freedom 6. Measurlng freedom 4 8eadlngs SLanford Lncyclopedla of hllosophy enLrles. CP8lS1MAn, !. (1988) 'ConsLrucung Lhe lnner ClLadel: 8ecenL Work on Lhe ConcepL of AuLonomy', !"#$%& 99(1): 109-124. uWC8kln, C. (1988), (#) (#)*+, -./ 0+-%1%) *2 34"*.*5,6 Cambrldge: Cambrldge unlverslLy ress. [Lspeclally chs. 1&2] 3 Summary 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy (and lLs relauonshlp Lo llberLy) 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy 3. lour problems wlLh Lhe ul model 6 Summary 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy (and lLs relauonshlp Lo llberLy) 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy 3. lour problems wlLh Lhe ul model 7 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons 8 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons AcLs 9 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs 10 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs ConsLralnLs 11 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs 12 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs Plgher order deslres Lower order deslres 13 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy Lower order deslres have an Lhelr ob[ecL cerLaln acuons. Lxamples: 1he urge Lo smoke Cdysseus wanLs Lo go Lo Lhe Slrens Plgher order deslres have as Lhelr ob[ecL lower order deslres. Lxamples: 1he deslre Lo be free from addlcuon Cdysseus wanLs Lo reslsL Lhe pull of Lhe Slrens and go home Lo enelope 14 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs Plgher order deslres Lower order deslres LlberLy -vla consLralnLs AuLonomy 13 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 8ellefs + ueslres = ueclslons CuLcomes AcLs Plgher order deslres Lower order deslres LlberLy -vla consLralnLs AuLonomy 16 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy 1here can be llberLy wlLhouL auLonomy L.g. A woman ls lndocLrlnaLed lnLo Lhe vlew LhaL she musL be subservlenL Lo her husband. no one prevenLs her acung on Lhls vlew, and ln facL she ls faclllLaLed ln acung on lL. 1here can be auLonomy wlLhouL llberLy L.g. Cdysseus decldlng Lo blnd hlmself Lo Lhe masL Lo avold Lhe pull of Lhe Slrens. 17 Summary 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy (and lLs relauonshlp Lo llberLy) 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy 3. lour problems wlLh Lhe ul model 18 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy .auLonomy ls concelved of as a second order capaclLy of persons Lo reecL crlucally upon Lhelr rsL-order preferences, deslres, wlshes, and so forLh and Lhe capaclLy Lo accepL or auempL Lo change Lhese ln llghL of hlgher-order preferences and values." uworkln, p.20 19 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy lf a smoker ls aware LhaL Lhey are addlcLed Lo smoklng, buL Lhlnks LhaL all Lhe coolesL people smoke, Lhey are auLonomous. lf a smoker ls aware LhaL Lhey are addlcLed Lo smoklng, wanLs Lo qulL, buL ls unable Lo, Lhey are noL auLonomous. 20 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy AuLonomy has Lwo feaLures: 1) CompeLency - Lhe ablllLy for lnLernal dellberauon and self-reecuon, lndependenL of exLernal lnuence 2) AuLhenuclLy - Lhe endorsemenL of Lhose deslres. 21 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy AuLonomy has Lwo feaLures: 1) CompeLency: Pow do we assess compeLence? uo we have a Lhreshold vlew? uoes Lhls open Lhe way for paLernallsm? 2) AuLhenuclLy: noL merely endorsemenL/ re[ecuon of lCu, buL Lhe ablllLy Lo alLer lCu. 22 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy WanL Lo wanL Lo smoke uon'L wanL Lo wanL Lo smoke WanL Lo smoke AuLonomous uon'L wanL Lo smoke Suppose someone smokes Second-order deslres l l r s L - o r d e r
d e s l r e s
23 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy WanL Lo wanL Lo smoke uon'L wanL Lo wanL Lo smoke WanL Lo smoke AuLonomous Akrauc uon'L wanL Lo smoke Suppose someone smokes Second-order deslres l l r s L - o r d e r
d e s l r e s
24 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy WanL Lo wanL Lo smoke uon'L wanL Lo wanL Lo smoke WanL Lo smoke AuLonomous Akrauc uon'L wanL Lo smoke Lnkrauc Suppose someone smokes Second-order deslres l l r s L - o r d e r
d e s l r e s
23 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy WanL Lo wanL Lo smoke uon'L wanL Lo wanL Lo smoke WanL Lo smoke AuLonomous Akrauc uon'L wanL Lo smoke Lnkrauc vlolauon of negauve llberLy? Suppose someone smokes Second-order deslres l l r s L - o r d e r
d e s l r e s
26 Summary 1. 1he ldea of auLonomy (and lLs relauonshlp Lo llberLy) 2. 1he uworkln/ lrankfurL model of auLonomy 3. lour problems wlLh Lhe ul model 27 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 1. uo we really need Lo lnLroduce hlgher order deslres? 2. uo we LhreaLen an lnnlLe regress? 3. uo we need Lo lnLroduce a subsLanuve nouon of auLonomy? 4. WhaL abouL cases where second-order deslres are Lhe resulL of manlpulauon? 28 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 1. uo we really need Lo lnLroduce hlgher order deslres? Couldn'L we dlsungulsh beLween Lhe auLonomous and non-auLonomous smoker aL Lhe level of lower order deslres? uworkln's example: we wanL Lo dlsungulsh beLween a docLor lylng Lo a pauenL ouL of paLernallsm, and a docLor lylng Lo a pauenL because Lhe pauenL asked Lhem Lo. 29 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 2. uo we LhreaLen an lnnlLe regress? We have rsL order deslres abouL acuons. We have second order deslres abouL rsL order deslres. Why noL have Lhlrd order deslres abouL second order deslres, fourLh order deslres abouL Lhlrd order deslres, . uworkln - as a mauer of emplrlcal facL we don'L have an lnnlLe number of levels. AuLonomy ls Lhe capaclLy of Lhls hlghesL level Lo reecL on and accepL/ re[ecL Lhe lower level deslres. 8uL - we may face a problem of [usucauon. 30 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 3. uo we need Lo lnLroduce a subsLanuve nouon of auLonomy? rocedural auLonomy - some (mlnlmal) %-7-%$", Lo reecL on lCu and %-7-%$", Lo accepL or re[ecL Lhem. [uworkln] SubsLanuve auLonomy - has concern for Lhe %*.")." of Lhe lCu. 31 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 3. uo we need Lo lnLroduce a subsLanuve nouon of auLonomy? L.g. 1he monk who delegaLes all conLrol of hls llfe Lo hls Crder doesn'L seem auLonomous. 1hls cerLalnly seems llke a case where second order deslres have llule lmpacL on rsL order deslres. uworkln - Lo lnslsL on a subsLanuve nouon of auLonomy makes auLonomy lnconslsLenL wlLh loyalLy, love, commlLmenL.Someone who ls loyal does noL lack auLonomy. uworkln - provlded LhaL resLrlcuons are self-lmposed, sull counL as auLonomous. 32 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 3. uo we need Lo lnLroduce a subsLanuve nouon of auLonomy? osluve nouons of auLonomy lead Lo Lhe paradox of posluve freedom. 8uL whaL abouL slavery? Clobal vs. local nouon of auLonomy. 33 3. Crluclsms of Lhe uworkln model 4. WhaL abouL cases where second-order deslres are Lhe resulL of manlpulauon? [ChrlsLman] L.g. A young woman who ls anorexlc may have been bralnwashed lnLo Lhlnklng she ls Loo faL. Per rsL-order huger seems more auLhenuc Lhan her second order deslre Lo sLarve herself. 34 nexL week. 4. aLernallsm 33
Ethical Theories and Principles Are The Foundations of Ethical Analysis Because They Are The Viewpoints From Which Guidance Can Be Obtained Along The Pathway To A Decision