Nieves Estares Baldos V. Ca G.R. No. 170645: July 9, 2010 Carpio, J

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

NIEVES ESTARES BALDOS v.

CA
G.R. No. 170645 : July 9, 010
CAR!IO, J.
"#$%& o' %() C#&):
Reynaldo Pillazar, alias Reynaldo Baldos, was born on 30 October
1948. However, his birth was not reistered in the o!!ice o! the local civil
reistrar "ntil ro"hly 3# years later or on 11 $ebr"ary 198%. His certi!icate
o! live birth indicated &ieves Baldos as his 'other and Bartolo'e Baldos as
his !ather. &ieves Baldos also a((eared as the in!or'ant on the certi!icate o!
live birth. On 8 )arch 199%, &ieves Baldos !iled in the Reional *rial +o"rt
o! Olona(o +ity a co'(laint !or cancellation o! the late reistration o!
Reynaldo,s birth. -he clai'ed that Reynaldo was not really her son.
I&&u) o' %() C#&):
.hether the late reistration o! Reynaldo,s birth is valid.
Rul*+, o' %() Cou-%:
/n the real' o! the evidence on record, there is no do"bt that the
o((ositor is (etitioner,s son. Petitioner,s reason !or disownin the o((ositor
is obvio"s0 he did not live "( to her e1(ectation0 his wi!e is "nrate!"l to
everythin she did !or her and the o((ositor. Bad blood r"ns in the veins o!
the (arties. B"t while o((ositor 'ay have done an act that ca"sed (lainti!! to
r"e she ave hi' li!e, s"ch acts however, are not 2"sti!ications o! what she
(rays !ro' this +o"rt.
3n "nrate!"l act is not a ro"nd to cancel a validly e1ec"ted
doc"'ent, nor a reason to stri( a (erson o! one,s !iliation. /t 'ay be a
ro"nd !or disinheritance tho"h. *he doc"'ents add"ced on record are the
best evidence o! the (arties, relationshi(.

You might also like