Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CCL RCL JPM Upgrade
CCL RCL JPM Upgrade
CCL RCL JPM Upgrade
16 December 2009
CCL, CCL US
Upgrade to: Overweight
Previous: Neutral
$33.88
Cruise Industry Price Target: $43.00
We are assuming lead coverage, updating our estimates, and upgrading our ratings on Cruise Lines
CCL and RCL to Overweight from Neutral. We believe both CCL and RCL will AC
Kevin Milota
continue to perform well through 2010 as cruise fundamentals begin to recover, with
(1-212) 622-0987
an improvement in consumer confidence as the sluggish macroeconomic environment kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
begins to right itself. Both CCL and RCL have been strong performers since February
Joseph Greff
29, 2009, as the recession came to a head (when they hit trough valuation/stock
(1-212) 622-0548
levels); CCL is up 73% and RCL is up 332% versus the 51% return of the S&P 500. joseph.greff@jpmorgan.com
We believe the lion’s share of the stock performance to date has been driven by the
Daniel Yoon
recovery in 2010E EPS. Moving forward in 2010, we think given the recovery in (1-212) 622-1205
ROICs at CCL and RCL, investors will begin to refocus their sights on multiple daniel.yoon@jpmorgan.com
expansion, which to a large extent has not been the emphasis to date. Both CCL and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
RCL have historically had significant second-derivative moves, as the stocks have
tended to outperform when net yield acceleration occurred on a year-over-year basis
(i.e., a positive swing rather than positive growth in net yields). We anticipate the
second-derivative change in net yields will turn positive in 2010 (even though we only
assume single-digit net yield increases for RCL and CCL, this is less negative than in
2009). Currently, CCL and RCL are trading below long-term average forward P/E
multiples of 16.4x and 14.8x, respectively.
• Some may ask whether we like either CCL or RCL more. The quick answer is
that we like both, and think CCL and RCL will work in tandem in 2010. Since
1993, the correlation coefficient for stock price performance between CCL and
RCL has been 0.87, as investors have believed a recovery in the overall operating
environment would benefit both industry participants. While we often point to the
overall revitalization of demand (and thereby pricing) in the industry, we think that
both CCL and RCL have unique investment facets that should be of interest to
large-cap investors (particularly CCL) and SMid-cap investors (particularly RCL).
• We are upgrading CCL to Overweight (from Neutral) and are establishing a
YE10 price target of $43. We are positive on the stock as we believe that:
1) recovering net yields and extended booking windows will drive EBITDA and
EPS growth in 2010 and 2011; 2) increasing ticket prices should highlight
operating leverage and increase flow-through during the recovery; 3) the company
should see continued success with its cost-containment efforts; and 4) we view
free cash flow as underappreciated and see potential dividend reinstatement in
2010.
• We are upgrading RCL to Overweight (from Neutral) and are establishing a
YE10 price target of $34. We are positive on the stock as we believe that:
1) RCL’s booking patterns and net yield performance will be stronger in FY10
(largely due to its higher-yielding new capacity); 2) its stock has historically been
a strong second-derivative performer as fundamentals improve; 3) its substantial
operating leverage (given its smaller scale) should incrementally benefit EBITDA
flow-through and EPS growth; and 4) its new capacity likely will bear fruit and
contribute to strong net yield performance.
• We think CCL and RCL are attractively valued versus each company’s respective
long-term trading ranges coming out of this downturn. Currently, CCL and RCL are
trading at 11.9x and 10.7x our 2011 EPS estimates, versus long-term average forward
P/E multiples of 16.4x and 14.8x, respectively. In the two years following the
reemergence of positive net yields (2004 and 2005), CCL traded at 17.2x and 18.9x
forward-year EPS estimates, while RCL traded at and 14.6x and 15.5x.
• Looking at historical results (since ’99 for RCL and ’03 for CCL), we have found
a high positive correlation between cruise net yields and domestic lodging
RevPAR on a quarterly basis (0.82 correlation coefficient, and 0.67 R2). We find this
strong correlation encouraging for net yield performance as we look to 2010 as the
recovery year for lodging RevPAR. In particular, transient lodging demand has been
up +7.3% in 4Q09 (vs. +5.0% in 3Q09, and +1.1% in 2Q09), which in part has been
driven by the leisure traveler, which bodes well for increased cruise demand.
• The next catalyst for the group will be this Friday, December 18th, as CCL is set
to announce 4Q09 earnings. In the release CCL will provide its first take on formal
guidance for 2010, in which it will provide net yield, net cruise cost, and fuel
guidance (price per metric ton and consumption). We believe CCL will indicate that
it continues to see the booking window elongate and pricing on its itineraries
strengthen. We believe that positive commentary coming out of CCL’s call on Friday
would benefit RCL as well, as the company’s net yields and ticket pricing appear to
be very strong on its recently launched Oasis of the Seas, and its newer Solstice and
Freedom class ships.
2
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Table of Contents
Carnival Corp. ...........................................................................4
Key Investment Points .................................................................................................4
Investment Risks..........................................................................................................6
4Q09 and 2010 Earnings Estimates ...........................................................................11
Forward Demand Commentary..................................................................................11
Company Guidance....................................................................................................12
Valuation & Price Target Summary...........................................................................14
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. ...............................................22
Key Investment Points ...............................................................................................22
Investment Risks........................................................................................................24
4Q09 and 2010 Earnings Outlook..............................................................................26
Forward Demand Commentary..................................................................................26
Company Guidance....................................................................................................28
Valuation & Price Target Summary...........................................................................29
Cruise Industry Summary......................................................37
Cruise Industry Stock Drivers ...............................................43
3
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Carnival Corp.
Carnival Corporation (CCL;CCL US)
Company Data 2008A 2009E 2009E 2010E 2010E 2011E
Price ($) 33.88 (Old) (New) (Old) (New)
Date Of Price 15 Dec 09 EPS Reported ($)
52-week Range ($) 34.95 - Q1 (Feb) 0.30 0.33A 0.33A 0.15
16.80 Q2 (May) 0.48 0.31A 0.33A 0.28
Mkt Cap ($ bn) 27.41 Q3 (Aug) 1.65 1.37A 1.33A 1.51
Fiscal Year End Nov Q4 (Nov) 0.47 0.20A 0.20A 0.39
Shares O/S (mn) 809 FY 2.90 2.21A 2.19A 2.25 2.33 2.84
Price Target ($) 43.00 Bloomberg EPS FY ($) 2.83 2.19A 2.32 2.71
Price Target End 31 Dec 10 Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates. 'Bloomberg' above denotes Bloomberg
consensus estimates.
Date
4
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
growth in available lower berth days in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Given the
reliance on rates, for which every incremental dollar above the breakeven rate
generates 100% flow-through to EBITDA, we believe CCL will be able to drop 22%
and 56% of incremental net revenue to the EBITDA line in 2010 and 2011,
respectively. While not necessarily inspiring, we note that elevated fuel costs per
ALBD, with expected growth of +37% year-over-year in 2010, erode much of the
operating leverage. That said, if we exclude fuel costs, flow-through improves to
59% and 64% in 2010 and 2011, respectively.
Keen eye on cost containment should set the stage for EBITDA and EPS growth
We believe Carnival will remain vigilant in maintaining its net cruise costs per
ALBD. We project net cruise costs per ALBD (excluding fuel) will increase +0.4%
in both 2010 and 2011, in line with management’s cost containment goal of
managing net cruise cost per ALBD (excluding fuel) within a range of flat to half the
rate of inflation. Much of the heavy lifting was done in 2009 as the company
successfully used its substantial economies of scale to negotiate price with many of
its vendors, and aggressively worked to reduce its fuel expense (through more fuel-
efficient capacity and aggressively managing its fuel consumption through proactive
itinerary-related efforts). While we note that much of the upside from these
initiatives should continue to be overshadowed by increases in fuel prices, we are
comfortable that our 2010 estimates take into account growth in fuel costs
sufficiently healthy to allow for potential EPS upside should the cost of fuel temper
(presently modeled at $475 per metric ton). Net-net, our sense is that the cost-
containment efforts could translate to meaningful bottom-line growth should one of
two things occur, neither of which is currently incorporated in our model: 1) a
meaningful upswing in demand or 2) a slowdown in the escalation of fuel prices.
5
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Investment Risks
Potential downside risks to our rating and price target include: 1) investor sentiment
towards consumer discretionary stocks could erode further and valuation multiples
contract; 2) fuel costs, which accounted for 23.3% of operating expenses in 2008,
could escalate more meaningfully than we are currently forecasting; 3) overcapacity
in the cruise industry stemming from new competitive supply could negatively affect
pricing should demand not outstrip supply growth; 4) risks associated with one large
shareholder group controlling ~38% of the outstanding stock; 5) regulatory and
generic investment risks such as a weakening economy or unfavorable legislative
changes both domestically or internationally.
Fuel-price volatility
As Carnival does not hedge, it is directly affected by swings in fuel prices. Rising
IFO-380 costs increase Carnival’s operating expense. While the company has made
strides to reduce its level of consumption through technological innovations, as well
a higher proportion of new, more fuel-efficient ships in its fleet, its operations remain
highly susceptible to fuel price volatility. In addition, higher crude prices have a
perceived negative effect on the spending patterns of lower-income leisure travelers,
and vice versa. We estimate a 10% change in the fuel cost per metric ton affects our
2010 EPS estimate for Carnival by approximately $0.20.
6
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Company Description
Carnival Corp. (CCL) is the largest cruise company in the world, operating 93 ships
with 180,442 berths under eleven brands. Its portfolio of contemporary, premium,
and luxury brands consists of Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland America Line, Princess
Cruises, and Seabourn Cruise Line in North America; P&O Cruises, Cunard Line,
and Ocean Village in the United Kingdom; AIDA in Germany; Costa Cruises in
southern Europe; Iberocruceros in Spain; and P&O Cruises in Australia.
In April 2003 Carnival Corp. and Carnival plc (formerly P&O Princess Cruises plc)
completed a dual-listed company transaction that combined the businesses of both
companies and called for the shares of Carnival Corp. and Carnival plc to trade on
the NYSE and FTSE, respectively, under the ticker CCL. Carnival Corp. and
Carnival plc are public companies with separate stock listings and shareholders.
Carnival Corp. is incorporated in Panama, Carnival plc in England and Wales.
7
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
8
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
9
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Seabourn
Seabourn Sojourn 6/10 450 32,000 $250 $555,556
Newbuild 6/11 450 32,000 $250 $555,556
Total 2 900 64,000 $500 $1,111,111
Average $555,556
AIDA
AIDAblu 2/10 2,174 71,000 €350 $235,051
Newbuild 4/11 2,174 71,000 €380 $255,198
Newbuild 6/12 2,174 71,000 €385 $258,556
Total 3 6,522 213,000 €1,115 $748,804
Average $249,601
Costa
Costa Deliziosa 2/10 2,260 92,700 €420 $271,327
Newbuild 7/11 3,012 €510 $247,211
Newbuild 5/12 3,012 €510 $247,211
Total 3 8,284 92,700 €1,440 $765,750
Average $255,250
P&O Cruises
Azura 4/10 3,098 116,000 €535 $252,130
Total 1 3,098 116,000 €535 $252,130
Average $252,130
Cunard
Queen Elizabeth 10/10 2,092 92,000 $700 $334,608
Total 1 2,092 92,000 $700 $334,608
Average $334,608
10
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Full-year 2010
Our full-year 2010 recurring EPS estimate is $2.33, up ~6.5% from the recurring
full-year 2009 level, and $0.01 above consensus. We expect net yield growth of
3.2%. On the cost side, we forecast an increase in net cruise cost (per available
lower-berth day) of 4.9% with fuel cost per metric ton of $475. We forecast net
revenues of $11.59 billion (up 11.2%) and operating income of $2.26 billion (up
7.4%).
For 1Q10, given that Carnival is almost fully booked (as ships typically are close to
95% booked one quarter in advance) with business that was sold at lower price levels
(on a constant-dollar basis), it will be difficult for the company to increase pricing on
the close-in bookings to a level that would offset the weak rates booked earlier in
2009; thus, the company expects 1Q10 net yields to decline on a year-over-year
basis. However, given the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar to the Euro/GBP, we
expect net yields to be flat to modestly up in the 1Q10 on a current-dollar basis. If
booking volumes continue at current levels, Carnival believes that, on a quarterly
basis for 2010, it should start to see a positive effect on local-currency yields and a
gradual year-over-year improvement in net yields.
11
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Company Guidance
Figure 4: Carnival Corp. & Plc – Company Guidance
$ in millions
4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 2010 2011 2012
Capacity Growth incl. Iberocruceros 7.7% 9.9% 9.0% 7.7% 5.1% 4.7%
Net Yield Growth (Current $) -9% to -11%
Net Yield Growth (Constant $) -11% to -13%
Net Cruise Costs/ALBD Growth (Current $) -2% to -4%
Net Cruise Costs/ALBD Growth (Constant $) -4% to -6%
Net Cruise Costs/ALBD Growth (Ex Fuel)
Depreciation & Amortization
Interest Expense, Net
Tax Rate
Earnings per Share $0.16-0.20
Other Items
Fuel Consumption (MM Metric Tons) 830
Fuel Price ($ per Metric Ton) $465
Fuel Impact (10% Change) FY09; $116 million or $0.15
Qualitative Comments
Northern American Brands
Capacity Growth 5.7% 5.3% 4.0%
Bookings Flat Moderately ↓, however stronger booking Moderately ↓
patters over the last several months
Pricing ↓ in mid-teens range, though very little inventory ↓ Currently but ↑ Compared to End of 1Q09 ↓ Currently but ↑ Compared to End of 2Q09
European Brands
Capacity Growth 9.6% 15.0% 15.2%
Bookings Flat Moderately ↓ Moderately ↓
Pricing ↓ in local currency, very little inventory ↓ Currently but ↑ Compared to End of 1Q09 ↓ Currently but ↑ Compared to End of 2Q09
12
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 5: CCL EPS Sensitivity to Changes in Net Yields and Fuel Prices
$ in millions
CCL Guidance (as of 3Q09) JPM Estimates
4Q09 FY09 1Q10E FY10E FY11E FY12E
Fuel Price / Metric Ton $465 $365 $475 $475 $485 $485
Consumption (Metric Tons in 000s) 0.83 3.19 0.81 3.37 3.46 3.55
Fuel Expense 386 1,164 386 1,599 1,680 1,723
13
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
At current levels, Carnival trades at 14.6x, 11.9x, and 10.2x our 2010, 2011, and
2012 EPS estimates, respectively. Since 1993, shares have traded at an average
forward-year P/E multiple of 16.4x, with a high of 30.3x (in January 1999) and a low
of 6.8x (in January 2009).
Figure 7: CCL EPS Sensitivity Grid and Price Target Sensitivity Analysis
$ in millions
TARGET PRICE SENSITIVITY
2011 Net Yield (YoY % Change) 2011 Net Yield (YoY % Change)
-1.0% pt. -0.5% pt. +0.5% pt. +1.0% pt. -1.0% pt. -0.5% pt. +0.5% pt. +1.0% pt.
2.2% 2.7% 3.2% 3.7% 4.2% 2.2% 2.7% 3.2% 3.7% 4.2%
-10% $428 $2.89 $2.97 $3.05 $3.13 $3.20 -10% $428 $43 $45 $46 $47 $48
2011 Fuel Price ($/Ton)
-5% $451 $2.79 $2.87 $2.94 $3.02 $3.10 -5% $451 $42 $43 $44 $45 $46
$485 $2.68 $2.76 $2.84 $2.92 $3.00 ### $485 $40 $41 $43 $44 $45
5% $499 $2.58 $2.66 $2.74 $2.81 $2.89 5% $499 $39 $40 $41 $42 $43
10% $523 $2.48 $2.55 $2.63 $2.71 $2.79 10% $523 $37 $38 $39 $41 $42
14
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Risk/Reward Analysis
Our risk/reward analysis derives a matrix of year-end 2011 per share valuations for
Carnival with a range of EPS estimates and a range of valuation multiples. The base
case represents our 2011 EPS estimate, while the upside/downside cases represent
positive and negative variances (in 5% increments) from our estimate. The valuation
range considers our fair value estimate and current/historical trading multiples.
Current 1-Yr Forward P/E Multiple 11.9x $28.80 $30.49 $32.19 $34 $35.57 $37.27 $38.96
% change from current price -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
Note:
Represents current share price.
Historical Valuation
Average: 15.1x
35.0x
Peak: 30.3x
Trough: 6.8x
30.0x
Current Forward Valuation
2011: 11.9x 25.0x
20.0x
15.0x
10.0x
5.0x
Jan-88
Jul-88
Jan-89
Jul-89
Jan-90
Jul-90
Jan-91
Jul-91
Jan-92
Jul-92
Jan-93
Jul-93
Jan-94
Jul-94
Jan-95
Jul-95
Jan-96
Jul-96
Jan-97
Jul-97
Jan-98
Jul-98
Jan-99
Jul-99
Jan-00
Jul-00
Jan-01
Jul-01
Jan-02
Jul-02
Jan-03
Jul-03
Jan-04
Jul-04
Jan-05
Jul-05
Jan-06
Jul-06
Jan-07
Jul-07
Jan-08
Jul-08
Jan-09
Jul-09
15
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 9: Carnival Corp. & Plc – Discounted Cash Flow Valuation ($ in millions, except per share data)
$ in millions
CAGR
2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2009 - 2013
Earnings Before Interest & Taxes (EBIT) $2,105 $2,261 $2,689 $3,072 $3,379 13%
Less: Taxes 9 25 30 34 38
Tax Rate 0.4% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1%
Less: Investment & Other Capex 3,400 3,700 2,700 2,400 2,400
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 1,314 1,409 1,529 1,645 1,645
= Unlevered Free Cash Flow $10 ($55) $1,489 $2,283 $2,587 300%
Terminal Value Multiple 12.5x
Terminal Value 62,806
PV Discount Factor at WACC 0.931 0.846 0.769 0.699 0.636 0.636
PV of FCF 9 -46 1145 1596 1644 39,923
Capital Value $44,272
Less: 3Q09 Net Debt 9,138
= Equity Value $35,134
Diluted Shares Outstanding 809.0
= Equity Value per Share $43
Current Price $33.88
Appreciation Potential 28%
CAPM: 12.3%
=Rf + Beta *(Rm-Rf)
Risk Free Rate, Rf 3.4%
Expected Market Return, Rm 10.00%
Beta 1.35
Sensitivity Analysis:
WACC
9.0% 10.0% 11.0%
11.5x 41.71 39.50 37.40
Terminal Value
Multiple
16
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
ROIC Analysis
We believe that return on invested capital (ROIC), which measures the un-leveraged
cash returns generated per dollar invested in the company, is the most accurate gauge
of a company’s ability to create value. ROIC measures the cash-on-cash returns
generated by a company, independent of its financing and accounting strategies.
While other performance measures such as return on equity, EBITDA returns, and
project returns can prove useful and serve as proxies for value creation, ROIC, while
more difficult to calculate, is the most effective, in our view. While the
aforementioned statistics can be skewed by leverage, stock buybacks, and/or
accounting strategies, ROIC is relatively immune to these manipulations.
ROIC enables investors to determine how efficiently management runs its assets
independent of how it chooses to finance them. For investors, it provides the
opportunity to look through various financial strategies and accounting procedures
and identify the real economic return a company’s management can generate. When
evaluating a company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which represents
the minimum rate of return (adjusted for risk) that a company must earn to create
value for both shareholders and creditors, the spread between ROIC and WACC
represents the company’s true economic profit.
Figure 10: Carnival Corp. & Plc – Historical and Projected ROICs, 2003-12E
$ in millions
16% 14.6%
14% 12.6%
11.8%
12% 10.6% 10.5% 10.2% 9.9% 9.8% 10.0% 10.0%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
8.5% 11.7% 13.0% 12.5% 12.1% 11.0% 9.6% 9.9% 12.0% 11.2%
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
CCL ROIC CCL WACC
17
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 11: Carnival Corp. & Plc – ROIC and Value Spread Trends, 2003-12E
$ in millions
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
Recurring EBIT $1,416 $2,172 $2,639 $2,613 $2,725 $2,729 $2,105 $2,261 $2,689 $3,072
Tax Rate 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
After-Tax EBIT 1,381 2,118 2,573 2,548 2,657 2,661 2,052 2,205 2,622 2,995
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization $660 $811 $902 $988 $1,101 $1,249 $1,314 $1,409 $1,529 $355
Less: Other Capex $233 $370 $503 $511 $597 $908 $665 $746 $682 $186
= Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) $1,808 $2,559 $2,972 $3,025 $3,161 $3,002 $2,702 $2,869 $3,470 $3,164
CCL ROIC 8.5% 11.7% 13.0% 12.5% 12.1% 11.0% 9.6% 9.9% 12.0% 11.2%
CCL WACC 11.8% 12.6% 14.6% 10.6% 10.5% 10.2% 9.9% 9.8% 10.0% 10.0%
ROIC - WACC -3.2% -0.9% -1.6% 1.9% 1.7% 0.8% -0.3% 0.1% 2.0% 1.2%
Risk Free Rate, Rf 4.4% 4.2% 4.4% 4.7% 3.9% 2.4% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%
Expected Market Return, Rm 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Beta 1.20 1.23 1.52 1.31 1.29 1.36 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
Market Cap 30,155 49,043 45,610 41,006 36,838 19,845 26,414 26,414 26,414 26,414
Total Debt 5,946 6,495 5,894 6,451 7,456 8,477 9,749 10,449 9,608 10,262
% Equity of Capital Structure 84% 88% 89% 86% 83% 70% 73% 72% 73% 72%
% Debt of Capital Structure 16% 12% 11% 14% 17% 30% 27% 28% 27% 28%
Cost of Debt, After Tax 3.0% 3.5% 4.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.3% 3.5% 3.3% 3.6% 4.0%
WACC 11.8% 12.6% 14.6% 10.6% 10.5% 10.2% 9.9% 9.8% 10.0% 10.0%
18
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
19
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 14: Carnival Corp. & Plc – Free Cash Flow and Balance Sheet Model
$ in millions
FREE CASH FLOW MODEL 2006 2007 2008E 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09E 2009E 1Q10E 2Q10E 3Q10E 4Q10E 2010E 2011E 2012E
Net Income 2,279 2,408 2,330 260 264 1,073 155 1,752 121 220 1,221 309 1,871 2,286 2,684
Add: Depreciation & Amortization 988 1,101 1,249 311 317 336 350 1,314 346 352 355 356 1,409 1,529 1,645
Less: Capitalized Interest Expense (37) (52) (53) (9) (10) (9) (9) (37) (11) (11) (11) (11) (44) (38) (30)
Less: Dividends (803) (1,050) (1,261) (314) (314) (59) (59) (59) (59) (236) (236) (236)
Less: Investment Capex (Incl. New Ships) (1,969) (2,716) (2,445) 0 (1,626) (292) (818) (2,735) 0 (1,620) (740) (595) (2,954) (2,018) (1,111)
Less: Other Capex (511) (597) (908) (306) (24) (154) (180) (665) (186) (186) (186) (186) (746) (682) (1,289)
Gross Free Cash Flow (53) (905) (1,088) (58) (1,079) 954 (501) (684) 211 (1,303) 579 (187) (699) 841 1,663
Less: Acquisitions/Other 0 0 0
Add: Share Issuances (Repurchases) (841) (415) (82)
Add (Less): Other 375 86 386 (157) 193 (298) (262)
Net Free Cash Flow (519) (1,234) (784) (215) (886) 656 (501) (946) 211 (1,303) 579 (187) (699) 841 1,663
Beginning Long-Term Debt 7,352 7,847 8,852 9,343 9,515 10,279 10,114 9,343 10,615 10,404 11,707 11,128 10,615 11,315 10,474
New Net Long-Term Debt 495 1,005 491 172 764 (165) 501 1,272 (211) 1,303 (579) 187 699 (841) (1,663)
Ending Long-Term Debt 7,847 8,852 9,343 9,515 10,279 10,114 10,615 10,615 10,404 11,707 11,128 11,315 11,315 10,474 8,812
Less: Cash & Cash Equivalents 1,163 943 650 607 485 976 976 976 976 976 976 976 976 976 976
Net Debt 6,684 7,909 8,693 8,908 9,794 9,138 9,639 9,639 9,428 10,731 10,152 10,339 10,339 9,498 7,836
Change in Net Debt 519 1,225 784 215 886 (656) 501 946 (211) 1,303 (579) 187 699 (841) (1,663)
Book Value per Share 21.78 24.11 23.48 23.85 25.35 26.65 26.84 26.93 26.92 27.12 28.55 28.86 28.86 31.40 34.42
ROAE 13% 13% 12% 9% 8% 9% 10%
Leverage Ratios:
Long-Term Debt/Total Capital 30.1% 30.7% 32.9% 33.2% 33.5% 31.9% 32.8% 32.8% 32.3% 34.8% 32.5% 32.6% 32.6% 29.2% 24.0%
Net Debt/Total Capital 26.8% 28.4% 31.3% 31.7% 32.5% 29.8% 30.7% 30.7% 30.2% 32.8% 30.5% 30.7% 30.7% 27.2% 22.0%
EBITDA/Interest 11.5x 10.4x 8.0x 9.7x 8.8x 8.8x 9.1x 9.1x 9.0x 8.8x 9.2x 9.5x 9.5x 10.9x 12.9x
Net Debt/EBITDA (TTM) 1.9x 2.1x 2.2x 2.2x 2.5x 2.5x 2.8x 2.8x 2.8x 3.2x 2.9x 2.8x 2.8x 2.3x 1.7x
Long-Term Debt/EBITDA (TTM) 2.2x 2.3x 2.3x 2.4x 2.7x 2.8x 3.1x 3.1x 3.1x 3.5x 3.2x 3.1x 3.1x 2.5x 1.9x
EBIT/Interest 8.4x 7.4x 5.5x 6.6x 5.9x 5.7x 5.6x 5.6x 5.4x 5.2x 5.5x 5.9x 5.9x 7.0x 8.4x
Cruise Revenues
Passenger Ticket 8,903 9,792 11,210 2,219 2,242 3,105 2,421 9,987 2,465 2,532 3,446 2,703 11,146 12,145 13,031
yoy % change 6.0% 10.0% 14.5% -9.0% -13.4% -15.1% -4.1% -10.9% 11.1% 12.9% 11.0% 11.6% 11.6% 9.0% 7.3%
Passenger Ticket per PCD (in $) 168.1 171.3 179.9 147.4 141.6 171.6 147.0 152.6 148.1 145.8 178.5 153.6 157.2 161.9 165.1
yoy % change 0.9% 1.9% 5.0% -10.7% -17.0% -19.9% -11.0% -15.2% 0.5% 3.0% 4.0% 4.5% 3.0% 3.0% 2.0%
Onboard & Other 2,514 2,846 3,044 634 673 825 736 2,868 703 753 907 814 3,176 3,393 3,605
yoy % change 7.5% 13.2% 7.0% -9.7% -9.4% -4.5% 0.2% -5.8% 10.8% 11.8% 9.9% 10.6% 10.7% 6.9% 6.2%
Onboard & Other per PCD (in $) 47.5 49.8 48.9 42.1 42.5 45.6 44.7 43.8 42.2 43.3 47.0 46.3 44.8 45.2 45.7
yoy % change 2.4% 4.9% -1.9% -11.4% -13.2% -9.9% -7.0% -10.3% 0.3% 2.0% 3.0% 3.5% 2.2% 1.0% 1.0%
Gross Cruise Revenues 11,417 12,638 14,254 2,853 2,915 3,930 3,157 12,855 3,168 3,284 4,353 3,517 14,321 15,539 16,636
yoy % change 6.3% 10.7% 12.8% -9.1% -12.5% -13.1% -3.2% -9.8% 11.0% 12.7% 10.8% 11.4% 11.4% 8.5% 7.1%
Other (Tour) 422 395 392 11 33 209 39 292 11 33 211 39 295 295 295
yoy % change 18.2% -6.4% -0.8% -8.3% -29.8% -28.4% -4.0% -25.4% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Revenues 11,839 13,033 14,646 2,864 2,948 4,139 3,197 13,148 3,179 3,317 4,564 3,556 14,616 15,833 16,931
yoy % change 6.7% 10.1% 12.4% -9.1% -12.7% -14.0% -3.2% -10.2% 11.0% 12.5% 10.3% 11.2% 11.2% 8.3% 6.9%
Less: Commissions, Transportation & Other 1,749 1,941 2,232 514 440 515 493 1,962 571 497 596 550 2,214 2,412 2,588
yoy % change 6.3% 11.0% 15.0% -7.9% -16.2% -22.0% 0.8% -12.1% 11.1% 12.9% 15.7% 11.6% 12.8% 9.0% 7.3%
% of Passenger Ticket Revenues 19.6% 19.8% 19.9% 23.2% 19.6% 16.6% 20.4% 19.6% 23.2% 19.6% 17.3% 20.4% 19.9% 19.9% 19.9%
Less: Onboard & Other 453 495 501 104 110 131 121 466 115 123 144 134 516 552 586
yoy % change 10.0% 9.3% 1.2% -16.8% -9.1% -2.2% 0.2% -6.9% 10.8% 11.8% 9.9% 10.6% 10.7% 6.9% 6.2%
% of Onboard & Other Revenues 18.0% 17.4% 16.5% 16.4% 16.3% 15.9% 16.5% 16.3% 16.4% 16.3% 15.9% 16.5% 16.3% 16.3% 16.3%
Net Cruise Revenues 9,215 10,202 11,521 2,235 2,365 3,284 2,543 10,427 2,481 2,664 3,613 2,832 11,591 12,575 13,462
yoy % change 6.2% 10.7% 12.9% -9.0% -11.9% -11.9% -4.1% -9.5% 11.0% 12.7% 10.0% 11.4% 11.2% 8.5% 7.1%
Gross Yield = Gross Cruise Revenue per ALBD (in $) 228.59 233.46 241.83 196.86 190.15 241.97 196.64 206.94 198.88 196.55 252.83 206.23 214.06 220.98 225.97
yoy % change 1.7% 2.1% 3.6% -11.2% -17.3% -17.6% -10.1% -14.4% 1.0% 3.4% 4.5% 4.9% 3.4% 3.2% 2.3%
Net Yield = Net Cruise Revenue per ALBD (in $) 184.50 188.46 195.46 154.22 154.27 202.19 158.40 167.86 155.79 159.46 209.87 166.11 173.25 178.83 182.85
yoy % change 1.5% 2.1% 3.7% -11.1% -16.8% -16.5% -10.9% -14.1% 1.0% 3.4% 3.8% 4.9% 3.2% 3.2% 2.3%
20
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Other Expenses
Other (Tour) 314 296 293 16 35 145 36 232 16 35 146 36 233 233 233
yoy % change 23.6% -5.7% -1.0% -11.1% -20.5% -25.3% -4.0% -21.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%
% Other (Tour) Revenues 74.4% 74.9% 74.7% 145.5% 106.1% 69.4% 90.2% 79.2% 145.5% 106.1% 69.4% 90.2% 79.1% 79.1% 79.1%
Selling & Administrative (Tour) 42 32 35 8 7 9 11 35 9 8 10 12 38 40 41
yoy % change -8.7% -23.8% 9.4% 0.0% -22.2% 12.5% 10.6% 0.2% 9.9% 9.0% 6.0% 6.2% 7.6% 5.1% 4.7%
21
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
22
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
pricing premium that it commands over the company’s older fleet) and the continued
success of the Solstice class vessels. Royal Caribbean has historically outperformed
the S&P 500 by a spread of +980bps, versus +340bps for Carnival. We believe this is
due to Royal Caribbean’s substantial operating leverage, which helps its EBITDA
and EPS rebound at a faster pace given its smaller scale (it is approximately one-third
the size of Carnival); we think this is fully recognized by investors.
23
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
trade at 14x our 2011 EPS estimate. Our target multiple is 0.8x below the company’s
average forward-year P/E multiple over the long term. We believe using such a
multiple is reasonable given the earnings contribution from its new hardware and
significant operating leverage to a cycle of increases in industry net yields. In the two
years following the turn to positive yields (2004 and 2005), Royal traded at 14.6x
and 15.5x forward-year EPS estimates. The target multiple we apply to our 2011 EPS
estimate for Royal is one turn below our valuation multiple for Carnival due to
Royal’s higher financial leverage and lower historical multiples in a recovery.
Investment Risks
Potential downside risks to our rating and price target include: 1) investor sentiment
towards consumer discretionary stocks could erode further and valuation multiples
contract; 2) fuel costs, which accounted for 20.5% of operating expenses in 2008,
could escalate more meaningfully than we are currently forecasting; 3) overcapacity
in the cruise industry stemming from new competitive supply could negatively affect
pricing should demand not outstrip supply growth; 4) risks associated with two large
shareholder groups controlling ~36% of the outstanding stock; and 5) regulatory and
generic investment risks such as a weakening economy or unfavorable legislative
changes both domestically or internationally.
Fuel-price volatility
Unlike Carnival, Royal Caribbean has historically hedged ~50% of its forward-year
fuel consumption needs. More recently, Royal Caribbean has been more aggressive
with its hedging efforts for future periods; the company is presently 50% hedged in
2010, 45% hedged in 2011, and 5% hedged in 2012. While Royal is partly insulated
from volatile bunker price moves to the upside, Royal is still susceptible to increased
operating expense for the unhedged portion of its consumption. Conversely, in a
decreasing bunker fuel environment, the hedged component of forward bunker
consumption could be more expensive than at-the-market bunker spot levels, and
thereby weigh on earnings. While the company has made strides in reducing its level
of consumption through technological innovations, as well a higher proportion of
new, more fuel-efficient ships in its fleet, its operations remain highly susceptible to
fuel price volatility. In addition, higher crude prices have a perceived negative effect
on the spending patterns of lower-income leisure travelers, and vice versa. We
estimate a 10% change in the fuel cost per metric ton would affect our 2010 EPS
estimate for Royal by approximately $0.16.
24
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Company Description
Royal Caribbean International was founded in 1968. The current parent corporation,
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., was incorporated on July 23, 1985, in the Republic of
Liberia under the Business Corporation Act of Liberia.
25
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Celebrity
Celebrity Eclipse 4/26/2010 2,850 118,000 $700 $245,614
Solstice Class Unnamed 3Q11 2,850 118,000 $798 $280,000
Solstice Class Unnamed 4Q12 2,850 118,000 $798 $280,000
8,550 354,000 $2,296 $268,538
Full-year 2010
Our full-year 2010 recurring EPS estimate of $1.56 (up 125.9% from the full-year
2009 level) is $0.10 above consensus. We forecast net yield growth of 3.5%. On the
cost side, we forecast an increase in net cruise costs (per available passenger cruise
day) of 0.4% with fuel cost per metric ton of $488. We forecast net revenues of $5.08
billion (up 15.5%) and operating income of $688.7 billion (up 43%). Royal has not
yet provided formal 2010 guidance.
For 1Q10, the bookings pace turned positive (compared to the same time last year) in
August and continued through October. On a 1Q10 cumulative basis, Royal
Caribbean is slightly behind the year-ago level, but given the steep acceleration in
bookings from August onwards, the company expects to be more booked (versus the
same period in ’08) relatively soon. Prices for 1Q10 are trending above 2008 levels
(mostly driven by the Oasis of the Seas and Solstice class vessels which are heavily
booked in 1Q10). Excluding the newly launched Oasis of Seas and Solstice class
vessels (which will account for ~50% of Royal’s fleet in 2010), pricing for 1Q10 is
26
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
largely trending below 2008 levels. While Royal Caribbean did not provide formal
net yield guidance for 1Q10, it believes that it should achieve better net yields in
1Q10 than it did in 1Q09.
27
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Company Guidance
Figure 19: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. – Company Guidance
$ in millions
2009E 2009E 2009E 4Q09E 2010E 2011E 2012E
As of 4/23/09 As of 7/29/09 As of 11/3/09 As of 11/3/09 As of 11/3/09 As of 11/3/09 As of 11/3/09
Capacity Growth +5.9% +5.2% +5.1% +7.5% +11.6% +8.8% +2.7%
Net Yields ~ -12% to -13% ~ -14% ~ -14% ~ -7% to -8%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD ~ -10% to -12% ~ -10% ~ -10% ~ -10%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, excl. Fuel ~ -6% to -8% ~ -6% to -7% ~ -6% to -7% ~ -7% to -8%
Depreciation & Amortization $560-565 $565-570 $565-570 $150
Interest Expense, Net of Capitalized Interest $295-300 $310 $305 $80
Earnings per Share ~$1.35 $0.70 - $0.80 ~$0.70 ~($0.05)
Other Items
Fuel
Fuel Consumption (Metric Tons) 1,240 1,220 1,220 323
Fuel Expenses $574 $591 $591 $158
Fuel Price (Current $ per Metric Ton) $463 $484 $484 $489
Fuel Consumption Hedged 48% 50% 50% 40% 50% 50% 10%
Investment & Other Capex $2,100 $2,100 $2,100 $2,200 $1,000 $1,000
Figure 20: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. EPS Sensitivity to Changes in Net Yields and Fuel Prices
$ in millions
RCL Guidance (as of 3Q09) JPM Estimates
4Q09 1Q10E FY10E FY11E FY12E
Fuel Price / Metric Ton, net of hedges $489 $488 $488 $491 $515
JPM Estimated Unhedged Fuel Price / Metric Ton $471 $518 $518 $518 $518
JPM Estimated Hedged Fuel Price / Metric Ton $516 $459 $459 $459 $459
Total Consumption (Metric Tons in 000s) 0.323 0.32 1.35 1.44 1.44
Unhedged Consumption (Metric Tons in 000s) 0.194 0.161 0.676 0.790 1.368
Hedged Consumption (Metric Tons in 000s) 0.129 0.161 0.676 0.646 0.072
Percent Hedged (forward consumption) 40% 50% 50% 45% 5%
Fuel Expense 158 157 660 706 741
28
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
At current levels, RCL trades at 14.8x, 10.7x, and 8.6x our 2010, 2011, and 2012
EPS estimates, respectively. Since 1993, shares have traded at an average forward-
year P/E multiple of 14.8x, with a high of 58.4x (in January 2008) and a low of 4.4x
(in February 2009).
Figure 22: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. EPS Sensitivity Grid and Price Target Sensitivity Analysis
$ in millions
PRICE TARGET SENSITIVITY
2011 Net Yield (YoY % Change) 2011 Net Yield (YoY % Change)
-1.0% pt. -0.5% pt. +0.5% pt. +1.0% pt. -1.0% pt. -0.5% pt. +0.5% pt. +1.0% pt.
2.1% 2.6% 3.1% 3.6% 4.1% 2.1% 2.6% 3.1% 3.6% 4.1%
-10% $442 $2.35 $2.48 $2.62 $2.75 $2.88 -10% $442 $33 $35 $37 $38 $40
2011 Fuel Price ($/Ton)
-5% $467 $2.26 $2.39 $2.52 $2.65 $2.79 -5% $467 $32 $33 $35 $37 $39
$491 $2.16 $2.29 $2.43 $2.56 $2.69 $491 $30 $32 $34 $36 $38
5% $516 $2.07 $2.20 $2.33 $2.46 $2.60 5% $516 $29 $31 $33 $35 $36
10% $541 $1.97 $2.11 $2.24 $2.37 $2.50 10% $541 $28 $29 $31 $33 $35
29
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Risk/Reward Analysis
Our risk/reward analysis derives a matrix of year-end 2011 per share valuations for
Royal Caribbean from a range of EPS estimates and a range of valuation multiples.
The base case represents our 2011 EPS estimate, while the upside/downside cases
represent positive and negative variances (in 5% increments) from our estimate. The
valuation range considers our fair value estimate and current/historical trading
multiples.
Current 1-Yr Forward P/E Multiple 10.7x $22.04 $23.34 $24.63 $26 $27.23 $28.52 $29.82
% change from current price -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
Historical Valuation
70.0x
Average: 14.8x
Peak: 58.4x 60.0x
Trough: 3.9x
50.0x
Current Forward Valuation
2011: 10.7x 40.0x
30.0x
20.0x
10.0x
0.0x
12/30/1993
12/30/1994
12/30/1995
12/30/1996
12/30/1997
12/30/1998
12/30/1999
12/30/2000
12/30/2001
12/30/2002
12/30/2003
12/30/2004
12/30/2005
12/30/2006
12/30/2007
12/30/2008
12/30/2009
30
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 24: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. – Discounted Cash Flow Valuation ($ in millions, except per share data)
$ in millions
CAGR
2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2009 - 2013
Earnings Before Interest & Taxes (EBIT) $480 $689 $886 $1,001 $1,028 21%
Less: Taxes 12 17 22 25 26
Tax Rate 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Less: Investment & Other Capex 2,100 2,200 1,000 1,000 1,000
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 569 639 689 706 740
= Unlevered Free Cash Flow ($1,063) ($889) $554 $682 $742
Terminal Value Multiple 13.0x
Terminal Value 22,974
PV Discount Factor at WACC 0.934 0.852 0.778 0.710 0.648 0.648
PV of FCF -992 -758 431 484 480 14,884
Capital Value $14,529
Less: 3Q09 Net Debt 7,010
= Equity Value $7,519
Diluted Shares Outstanding 216
= Equity Value per Share $35
CAPM: 16.8%
=Rf + Beta *(Rm-Rf)
Risk Free Rate, Rf 3.3%
Expected Market Return, Rm 10.00%
Beta 2.02
Sensitivity Analysis:
WACC
8.6% 9.6% 10.6%
12.0x 32.45 29.48 26.66
Terminal Value
Multiple
31
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
ROIC Analysis
We believe that return on invested capital (ROIC), which measures the un-leveraged
cash returns generated per dollar invested in the company, is the most accurate gauge
of a company’s ability to create value. ROIC measures the cash-on-cash returns
generated by a company, independent of its financing and accounting strategies.
While other performance measures such as return on equity, EBITDA returns, and
project returns can prove useful and serve as proxies for value creation, ROIC, while
more difficult to calculate, is the most effective, in our view. While the
aforementioned statistics can be skewed by leverage, stock buybacks, and/or
accounting strategies, ROIC is relatively immune to these manipulations.
ROIC enables investors to determine how efficiently management runs its assets
independent of how it chooses to finance them. For investors, it provides the
opportunity to look through various financial strategies and accounting procedures
and identify the real economic return a company’s management can generate. When
evaluating a company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which represents
the minimum rate of return (adjusted for risk) that a company must earn to create
value for both shareholders and creditors, the spread between ROIC and WACC
represents the company’s true economic profit.
Figure 25: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. – Historical and Projected ROICs, 2003-12E
$ in millions
16%
14.1%
14%
11.8% 12.0%
12%
8%
6% 12.1%
10.3% 10.0%
4% 7.9% 8.4% 7.8% 8.5%
2% 4.4%
2.0% 2.6%
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
32
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 26: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. – ROIC and Value Spread Trends, 2003-12E
$ in millions
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
Recurring EBIT $526 $754 $872 $858 $901 $832 $480 $689 $886 $1,001
Tax Rate 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
After-Tax EBIT 513 735 850 837 879 811 468 671 864 976
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization $363 $394 $402 $422 $483 $520 $569 $639 $689 $706
Less: Other Capex $103 $126 $107 $220 $350 $1,061 $656 $646 $362 $362
= Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) $773 $1,003 $1,145 $1,039 $1,012 $271 $381 $664 $1,192 $1,320
RCL ROIC 7.9% 10.3% 12.1% 10.0% 8.4% 2.0% 2.6% 4.4% 7.8% 8.5%
RCL WACC 11.8% 12.0% 14.1% 8.9% 8.9% 8.5% 9.3% 9.0% 8.9% 9.0%
ROIC - WACC -4.0% -1.7% -2.0% 1.1% -0.5% -6.4% -6.7% -4.6% -1.1% -0.5%
Risk Free Rate, Rf 4.4% 4.2% 4.4% 4.7% 3.9% 2.4% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%
Expected Market Return, Rm 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Beta 1.81 1.45 1.74 1.11 1.12 1.87 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.02
Market Cap 6,803 10,924 9,479 8,752 9,092 2,945 5,592 5,592 5,592 5,592
Total Debt 5,836 5,732 4,155 5,411 5,698 7,011 8,113 8,134 8,702 8,399
% Equity of Capital Structure 54% 66% 70% 62% 61% 30% 41% 41% 39% 40%
% Debt of Capital Structure 46% 34% 30% 38% 39% 70% 59% 59% 61% 60%
Cost of Debt, After Tax 4.5% 5.3% 6.0% 6.2% 6.0% 5.0% 4.2% 3.7% 3.8% 3.9%
WACC 11.8% 12.0% 14.1% 8.9% 8.9% 8.5% 9.3% 9.0% 8.9% 9.0%
33
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
34
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 29: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. – Free Cash Flow and Balance Sheet Model
$ in millions
FREE CASH FLOW MODEL 2006 2007 2008 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09E 2009E 1Q10E 2Q10E 3Q10E 4Q10E 2010E 2011E 2012E
Net Income 634 603 574 (36) (35) 230 (10) 149 (8) 2 310 32 336 523 651
Add: Depreciation & Amortization 422 483 520 140 138 144 147 569 155 159 161 164 639 689 706
Less: Capitalized Interest Expense (28) (28) (44) (10) (20) (11) (7) (48) (7) (7) (7) (7) (28) (28) (28)
Less: Dividends (124) (98) (128) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Less: Investment Capex (Incl. New Ships) (861) (967) (1,163) (513) (932) (1,444) (560) (994) (1,554) (638) (638)
Less: Other Capex (220) (350) (1,061) (219) (104) (317) (15) (656) (162) (162) (162) (162) (646) (362) (362)
Gross Free Cash Flow (177) (357) (1,302) (126) (22) (466) (817) (1,430) (21) (568) 303 (967) (1,253) 185 329
Less: Acquisitions/Other (653) 0 51 291 291 0
Add: Share Issuances (Repurchases) (165) 0 0
Add (Less): Other (282) 195 105 (68) 74 (85) (79) 0
Net Free Cash Flow (1,277) (162) (1,146) 97 52 (551) (817) (1,219) (21) (568) 303 (967) (1,253) 185 329
Beginning Long-Term Debt 4,155 5,411 5,698 7,011 6,967 6,769 7,296 7,011 8,113 8,134 8,702 8,399 8,113 9,366 9,180
New Net Long-Term Debt 1,257 287 1,313 (44) (199) 527 817 1,101 21 568 (303) 967 1,253 (185) (329)
Ending Long-Term Debt 5,411 5,698 7,011 6,967 6,769 7,296 8,113 8,113 8,134 8,702 8,399 9,366 9,366 9,180 8,851
Less: Cash & Cash Equivalents 105 231 403 456 310 286 286 286 286 286 286 286 286 286 286
Net Debt 5,306 5,467 6,609 6,511 6,459 7,010 7,827 7,827 7,848 8,416 8,113 9,080 9,080 8,894 8,565
Change in Net Debt 1,277 161 1,141 (97) (52) 551 817 1,218 21 568 (303) 967 1,253 (185) (329)
Book Value per Share 27.50 31.54 31.78 31.59 32.97 34.51 34.47 32.39 32.21 32.22 33.66 33.81 33.81 36.23 39.25
ROAE 11% 9% 8% 2% 5% 7% 8%
Leverage Ratios:
Long-Term Debt/Total Capital 47.0% 45.7% 50.7% 50.8% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 53.8% 53.9% 55.6% 53.6% 56.2% 56.2% 54.0% 51.1%
Net Debt/Total Capital 46.6% 44.7% 49.3% 49.1% 47.8% 48.5% 51.3% 52.9% 53.0% 54.8% 52.8% 55.5% 55.5% 53.2% 50.3%
EBITDA/Interest 4.8x 4.1x 4.3x 3.9x 3.7x 3.3x 3.5x 3.5x 3.6x 3.6x 3.8x 3.9x 3.9x 4.5x 4.9x
Long-Term Debt/EBITDA (TTM) 4.2x 4.1x 5.2x 5.5x 5.8x 7.1x 7.7x 7.7x 7.4x 7.6x 6.7x 7.1x 7.1x 5.8x 5.2x
Operating Statistics
Available Passenger Cruise Days (APCD) 22.4 25.2 26.5 6.8 6.6 7.2 7.3 27.9 7.5 7.6 8.1 8.0 31.1 33.9 34.8
yoy % change 3.0% 12.3% 5.2% 7.7% 3.5% 3.1% 7.5% 5.4% 9.5% 15.0% 12.7% 9.4% 11.6% 8.8% 2.7%
Occupancy 106.5% 105.7% 104.5% 101.2% 102.3% 105.4% 100.7% 102.4% 101.7% 102.8% 105.9% 101.2% 102.9% 103.4% 104.2%
bp change -0.1% -0.8% -1.2% -3.2% -1.7% -2.4% -1.0% -2.1% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.8%
Passenger Cruise Days (PCD) 23.8 26.6 27.7 6.9 6.7 7.5 7.4 28.6 7.6 7.8 8.5 8.1 32.0 35.0 36.2
yoy % change 2.9% 11.5% 4.0% 4.4% 1.8% 0.8% 6.4% 3.3% 10.0% 15.6% 13.2% 9.9% 12.2% 9.3% 3.4%
Revenues
Passenger Ticket 3,838.6 4,427.4 4,730.3 949.3 956.6 1,270.6 1,031.9 4,208.4 1,065.5 1,138.6 1,503.5 1,179.9 4,887.5 5,502.3 5,805.7
yoy % change 6.3% 15.3% 6.8% -8.5% -16.1% -15.2% -2.1% -11.0% 12.2% 19.0% 18.3% 14.3% 16.1% 12.6% 5.5%
Passenger Ticket per PCD (in $) 161.0 166.5 171.0 137.5 142.0 168.4 139.8 147.3 140.2 146.3 176.0 145.4 152.5 157.1 160.2
yoy % change 3.4% 3.4% 2.7% -12.4% -17.6% -15.8% -8.0% -13.9% 2.0% 3.0% 4.5% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.0%
Onboard & Other 1,390.9 1,721.8 1,802.2 376.3 392.4 492.9 402.3 1,664.0 416.2 460.3 569.3 451.1 1,897.0 2,104.5 2,198.7
yoy % change 7.5% 23.8% 4.7% -3.8% -11.6% -12.8% 0.0% -7.7% 10.6% 17.3% 15.5% 12.1% 14.0% 10.9% 4.5%
Onboard & Other per PCD (in $) 58.3 64.7 65.2 54.5 58.3 65.3 54.5 58.2 54.8 59.1 66.6 55.6 59.2 60.1 60.7
yoy % change 4.5% 11.0% 0.7% -7.9% -13.1% -13.5% -6.0% -10.6% 0.5% 1.5% 2.0% 2.0% 1.6% 1.5% 1.0%
Total Revenues 5,229.6 6,149.1 6,532.5 1,325.6 1,349.0 1,763.5 1,434.2 5,872.4 1,481.7 1,598.9 2,072.8 1,631.0 6,784.5 7,606.8 8,004.4
yoy % change 6.7% 17.6% 6.2% -7.2% -14.8% -14.5% -1.5% -10.1% 11.8% 18.5% 17.5% 13.7% 15.5% 12.1% 5.2%
Less: Commissions, Transportation & Other 917.9 1,124.0 1,192.3 235.8 232.6 304.0 257.9 1,030.3 264.7 276.8 359.7 294.9 1,196.1 1,346.6 1,420.8
yoy % change 6.9% 22.5% 6.1% -8.6% -18.3% -19.1% -5.9% -13.6% 12.2% 19.0% 18.3% 14.3% 16.1% 12.6% 5.5%
% of Passenger Ticket Revenues 23.9% 25.4% 25.2% 24.8% 24.3% 23.9% 25.0% 24.5% 24.8% 24.3% 23.9% 25.0% 24.5% 24.5% 24.5%
Less: Onboard & Other 331.2 405.6 458.4 83.2 112.5 152.6 94.4 442.8 92.0 132.0 176.2 105.9 506.2 561.5 586.7
yoy % change 7.3% 22.5% 13.0% 6.0% -4.1% -9.3% 0.0% -3.4% 10.6% 17.3% 15.5% 12.1% 14.3% 10.9% 4.5%
% of Onboard & Other Revenues 23.8% 23.6% 25.4% 22.1% 28.7% 31.0% 23.5% 26.6% 22.1% 28.7% 31.0% 23.5% 26.7% 26.7% 26.7%
Net Revenues 3,980.4 4,619.5 4,881.8 1,006.5 1,003.9 1,307.0 1,081.9 4,399.3 1,124.9 1,190.1 1,536.9 1,230.2 5,082.2 5,698.7 5,996.9
yoy % change 6.5% 16.1% 5.7% -7.9% -15.0% -14.0% -0.6% -9.9% 11.8% 18.5% 17.6% 13.7% 15.5% 12.1% 5.2%
Net Yield = Net Revenue per APCD (in $) 177.76 183.64 184.47 147.54 152.46 182.60 147.56 157.70 150.58 157.16 190.53 153.38 163.25 168.25 172.40
yoy % change 3.4% 3.3% 0.5% -14.5% -17.9% -16.5% -7.4% -14.5% 2.1% 3.1% 4.3% 3.9% 3.5% 3.1% 2.5%
35
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
36
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
37
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Major Players
The cruise industry is essentially a duopoly, with the two largest global companies—
Carnival and Royal Caribbean—controlling approximately 75% of worldwide
capacity and ~85% of North American capacity in 2009 (approximately 372,000
berths, assuming double occupancy per cabin). The other company of note is NCL
Corporation (Norwegian Cruise Lines), which controls ~6% of worldwide capacity
and ~9% of North American capacity. The remainder of the industry generally
consists of regional cruise companies and/or vertically integrated tour operators.
Other, 19.0%
RCL, 26.0%
NCL, 6.3%
CCL, 48.6%
38
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Cruise Segments
The typical cruise passenger is 50 years old on average, with above-average income
($109,000 per household), married (86%), with a college education (69%), and the
majority of cruisers are employed (62%) versus the 17% who are retired. The typical
cruiser sailed an average of 6.6 days with his/her spouse (75%) and spent
approximately $1,880 per person for their cruise, including air and all onboard
expenses. Cruise company brands can be broadly segmented into contemporary,
premium, and luxury. However, there generally is significant overlap and
competition among the product offerings.
Lux ury , 1%
Premium, 34%
Contemporary ,
65%
39
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Key Markets
Cruise companies primarily source passengers and operate in North America and
Europe. Other key markets are Asia/South Pacific, including Australia and New
Zealand, and South America. Besides North America (19.9% of U.S. population has
ever taken a cruise), cruising represents a smaller portion of the overall vacation
market in other regions. For example, in the U.K. and Continental Europe, the
penetration per capita is three-fifths and one-fifth, respectively, of that in North
America. Elsewhere in the world, cruising is at an early stage of development and
has far lower penetration rates. Accordingly, these markets have considerable growth
potential, in our opinion.
Demand Outlook
Carnival demand commentary
As of 3Q09, Carnival noted that bookings for the next three quarters (through 2Q10)
were running up +19% on a year-over-year basis. After adjusting for projected
capacity increases, Carnival was moderately behind last year’s booking levels,
though management noted that the booking window continues to lengthen.
Regarding price, on an overall basis, Carnival has seen prices stabilize, and for
certain itineraries where it has seen the booking window lengthen, it has been able to
increase rates. Carnival’s ability to meaningfully increase rates for 2010 is contingent
on the continued strengthening of customer demand, which should eventually begin
to re-establish the consumer psyche of booking further out and wean the consumer
off the heavy discounting/promotional activity that has characterized 2009. With that
said, Carnival should be successful in closing the remaining capacity-adjusted
occupancy gap that remains as it moves through 1Q10.
For 1Q10, given that Carnival is almost fully booked (as ships typically are close to
95% booked one quarter in advance) with business that was sold at lower price levels
(on a constant-dollar basis), it will be difficult for the company to increase pricing on
close-in bookings to a level that would offset the weak rates booked earlier in 2009,
and the company expects 1Q10 net yields to decline on a year-over-year basis.
However, given the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar to the Euro/GBP, we expect
net yields to be flat to modestly up in 1Q10 on a current-dollar basis. If booking
volumes continue at current levels, Carnival believes that, on a quarterly basis for
2010, it should start to see a positive effect on local-currency yields and a gradual
year-over-year improvement in net yields.
40
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Our checks on Carnival’s new vessel the Dream (3,650 berths or ~2% of supply),
show it is driving a low-double-digit premium over pricing for older vessels with
similar itineraries in 1Q10 and 2Q10.
For 1Q10, the bookings pace turned positive (compared to the same time last year) in
August and continued through October. On a 1Q10 cumulative basis, Royal
Caribbean is slightly behind the year-ago level, but given the steep acceleration in
bookings since August, the company expects to be more booked (versus the same
period in ’08) relatively soon. Prices for 1Q10 are trending above 2008 levels
(mostly driven by the Oasis of the Seas and Solstice class vessels which are heavily
booked in 1Q10). Excluding the newly launched Oasis of Seas and Solstice class
vessels (which will account for ~50% of Royal’s fleet in 2010), pricing for 1Q10 is
largely trending below 2008 levels. While Royal Caribbean did not provide formal
net yield guidance for 1Q10, it believes that it should achieve better net yields in
1Q10 than it did in 1Q09.
Supply Outlook
Supply growth is expected to slow from 2009 to 2012, versus the fairly substantial
build-out the industry experienced from 2001 through 2009. We estimate worldwide
cruise industry supply will grow at an average rate of approximately 5.9% between
2009 and 2012, reaching 425,000 berths by 2012. We believe supply increases will
be concentrated in Europe, and to a lesser extent North America.
41
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
200,000 6%
Year-over-Year % Growth
5%
Capacity
150,000
4%
100,000 3%
2%
50,000
1%
0 0%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
10%
160,000
2002-2009
140,000 +10%
8%
Year-over-Year % Growth
120,000
Capacity
100,000 6%
80,000
4%
60,000
40,000
2%
20,000
0 0%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
42
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
43
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
Stock Price
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$0.00
1Q00
2Q00
3Q00
4Q00
1Q01
2Q01
3Q01
4Q01
1Q02
2Q02
3Q02
4Q02
1Q03
2Q03
3Q03
4Q03
1Q04
2Q04
3Q04
4Q04
1Q05
2Q05
3Q05
4Q05
1Q06
2Q06
3Q06
4Q06
1Q07
2Q07
3Q07
4Q07
1Q08
2Q08
3Q08
4Q08
1Q09
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09E
RCL CCL
44
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 38: Forward P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Berth Multiples for CCL and RCL
60x
55x
50x
45x
40x
35x
Forward P/E
30x
25x
20x
15x
10x
5x
0x
2Q93
4Q93
2Q94
4Q94
2Q95
4Q95
2Q96
4Q96
2Q97
4Q97
2Q98
4Q98
2Q99
4Q99
2Q00
4Q00
2Q01
4Q01
2Q02
4Q02
2Q03
4Q03
2Q04
4Q04
2Q05
4Q05
2Q06
4Q06
2Q07
4Q07
2Q08
4Q08
2Q09
4Q09
RCL Fw d. P/E CCL Fw d. P/E
30x
25x
20x
Forward EV/EBITDA
15x
10x
5x
0x
2Q93
4Q93
2Q94
4Q94
2Q95
4Q95
2Q96
4Q96
2Q97
4Q97
2Q98
4Q98
2Q99
4Q99
2Q00
4Q00
2Q01
4Q01
2Q02
4Q02
2Q03
4Q03
2Q04
4Q04
2Q05
4Q05
2Q06
4Q06
2Q07
4Q07
2Q08
4Q08
2Q09
4Q09
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
EV/Berth
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$0
1Q98
3Q98
1Q99
3Q99
1Q00
3Q00
1Q01
3Q01
1Q02
3Q02
1Q03
3Q03
1Q04
3Q04
1Q05
3Q05
1Q06
3Q06
1Q07
3Q07
1Q08
3Q08
1Q09
3Q09
45
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Net Yields
Net yields are the most relevant measure of pricing performance because they reflect
cruise revenues net of the most significant variable costs (commissions,
transportation, and other expenses, onboard and other expenses) on a capacity-
adjusted basis. Our analysis indicates that investors effectively price in what they
perceive to be the net yields approximately two quarters in advance. We calculate a
correlation coefficient of approximately 0.76 and 0.71 between CCL’s and RCL’s
stock prices (with a two-quarter lead) and net yields, respectively.
For 2009, on a current-dollar and constant-dollar basis, Carnival guided for net yields
to decline -14% and -10%, respectively, as the effects of the relatively strong dollar
in 1Q09 and 2Q09 drove current-dollar net yields lower. In 4Q09, currency is
expected to benefit net yields by ~200bps, as current-dollar and constant-dollar net
yield guidance calls for declines of -9% to -11%, and -11% to -13%, respectively.
We estimate that a change of one percentage point in net yield growth would affect
our 2010 EPS estimates by approximately $0.14 per share.
For 2009, Royal Caribbean guided for net yields to decline -14% on a constant-
currency basis, or -12% to -13% on a current-dollar basis. In the 4Q09, RCL guided
for net yields to decline -7% to -8%. We estimate that a change of one percentage
point in net yield growth would affect our 4Q09 EPS estimates by approximately
$0.05 per share for Royal Caribbean.
We estimate 2010 net yields will increase 3.5% for Royal Caribbean on capacity
increases and pricing that should begin to recover modestly in 2010. We estimate that
Royal Caribbean’s net yields will benefit by ~200bps, from the higher-priced
itineraries from its newly launched Oasis (Oasis of the Seas) and Solstice class
vessels (Equinox), and from its Freedom class vessels (which in total account for
21,900 berths, or 25% of RCL’s total berths). We believe that offsetting these strong
results will be cannibalization of demand that we think is all but inevitable when
introducing newer vessels; thus, pricing on some of RCL’s older ships should be
impacted. We estimate that a change of one percentage point in net yield growth
would affect our 2010 EPS estimates by approximately $0.24 per share for Royal
Caribbean.
In 2010, we expect Carnival’s net yields to increase 3.0%, as it largely benefits from
a modest recovery in the leisure traveler, and begins to regain pricing power on some
itineraries. In addition, we believe foreign exchange translation from its European
fleet will benefit CCL’s net yields by ~200bps in 2010, as the dollar continues to be
weak against the Euro and the British Pound. We estimate that a change of one
percentage point in net yield growth would affect our 2010 EPS estimates by
approximately $0.14 per share for Carnival.
46
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
20% 100%
15% 80%
60%
40%
5% 20%
0% 0%
-5% -20%
-40%
-10%
-60%
-15% -80%
-20% -100%
1Q03
2Q03
3Q03
4Q03
1Q04
2Q04
3Q04
4Q04
1Q05
2Q05
3Q05
4Q05
1Q06
2Q06
3Q06
4Q06
1Q07
2Q07
3Q07
4Q07
1Q08
2Q08
3Q08
4Q08
1Q09
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09E
1Q10E
CCL Net Yield CCL Stock Price (2 Qtr. Lead)
20% 200%
15% 150%
5% 50%
0% 0%
-5% -50%
-10% -100%
-15% -150%
-20% -200%
1Q00
2Q00
3Q00
4Q00
1Q01
2Q01
3Q01
4Q01
1Q02
2Q02
3Q02
4Q02
1Q03
2Q03
3Q03
4Q03
1Q04
2Q04
3Q04
4Q04
1Q05
2Q05
3Q05
4Q05
1Q06
2Q06
3Q06
4Q06
1Q07
2Q07
3Q07
4Q07
1Q08
2Q08
3Q08
4Q08
1Q09
2Q09
3Q09
4Q09E
1Q10E
47
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 41: RCL Price Performance in Periods of Net Yield Acceleration/Deceleration (Two-Quarter Lead for Stock/S&P500 Performance)
YOY % Change YOY Swing RCL Stock S&P 500 Outperformance/
Year RCL Net Yield in Net Yield in Net Yield % Performance (Indexed) Index Return (Underperformance)
Avg. Return When Net Yield Growth Accelerates 12.8% 3.0% 9.8%
Avg. Return When Net Yield Growth Decelerates -8.8% -3.4% -5.4%
Source: Company reports, Bloomberg, and J.P. Morgan.
48
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Figure 42: CCL Price Performance in Periods of Net Yield Acceleration/Deceleration (Two-Quarter Lead for Stock/S&P500 Performance)
YOY % Change YOY Swing CCL Stock S&P 500 Outperformance/
Year CCL Net Yield in Net Yield in Net Yield % Performance (Indexed) Index Return (Underperformance)
Avg. Return When Net Yield Growth Accelerates 8.4% 5.1% 3.4%
Avg. Return When Net Yield Growth Decelerates -3.2% -2.0% -1.2%
Source: Company reports, Bloomberg, and J.P. Morgan.
49
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
While lodging and cruise demand characteristics are different, as cruise demand is
~100% leisure-driven, and lodging demand is more levered to corporate
transient/group (~65-70% of rooms demanded) than leisure (~30% of rooms
demanded), we think the way the companies have historically managed demand and
occupancy in a slowing macro/consumer environment make for similarly weak
operating environments for both industries.
RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL
Correlation 0.81 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.81 0.86 0.80 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.79 0.75 0.79
R2 0.66 0.68 0.67 0.60 0.66 0.73 0.63 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.58 0.63 0.57 0.62
50
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
FY98 159.93 3.6% -- -- 47.99 4.7% 150.02 5.8% 90.83 3.5% 64.85 2.4% 42.13 3.3% 39.21 2.8% 25.97 2.7%
FY99 163.29 2.1% -- -- 49.57 3.3% 157.89 5.2% 93.42 2.9% 65.53 1.1% 42.89 1.8% 40.09 2.2% 26.76 3.1%
FY00 163.29 0.0% -- -- 50.89 2.7% 172.26 9.1% 99.96 7.0% 69.33 5.8% 44.54 3.9% 41.91 4.5% 27.54 2.9%
FY01 148.59 -9.0% -- -- 54.01 6.1% 147.34 -14.5% 88.40 -11.6% 63.50 -8.4% 41.60 -6.6% 41.24 -1.6% 26.60 -3.4%
FY02 147.54 -0.7% 160.34 -3.7% 50.25 -7.0% 139.33 -5.4% 85.38 -3.4% 60.56 -4.6% 39.95 -4.0% 40.98 -0.6% 25.65 -3.6%
FY03 146.65 -0.6% 155.09 -3.3% 48.91 -2.7% 140.75 1.0% 83.83 -1.8% 60.20 -0.6% 39.80 -0.4% 41.20 0.6% 25.31 -1.3%
FY04 160.12 9.2% 170.28 9.8% 49.14 0.5% 154.93 10.1% 90.61 8.1% 65.51 8.8% 42.25 6.2% 44.20 7.3% 26.50 4.7%
FY05 171.90 7.4% 181.76 6.7% 53.02 7.9% 172.38 11.3% 99.33 9.6% 72.12 10.1% 45.92 8.7% 49.38 11.7% 28.52 7.6%
FY06 177.76 3.4% 184.50 1.5% 57.55 8.5% 192.55 11.7% 106.35 7.1% 78.01 8.2% 48.86 6.4% 53.83 9.0% 29.93 5.0%
FY07 183.64 3.3% 188.46 2.1% 62.03 7.8% 207.57 7.8% 112.47 5.7% 81.75 4.8% 50.57 3.5% 57.02 5.9% 30.62 2.3%
FY08 184.47 0.5% 195.46 3.7% 65.62 5.8% 195.85 -5.6% 109.85 -2.3% 79.85 -2.3% 49.25 -2.6% 56.15 -1.5% 29.54 -3.5%
RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL RCL CCL
Correlation 0.13 0.52 0.84 0.57 0.89 0.74 0.87 0.73 0.87 0.68 0.76 0.61 0.78 0.66
R2 0.02 0.27 0.71 0.33 0.79 0.55 0.75 0.54 0.75 0.47 0.58 0.37 0.61 0.44
51
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Fuel Prices
Cruise companies use a combination of fuel blends with bunker (IFO-380)
constituting the majority of Carnival’s and Royal Caribbean’s fuel consumption. In
2009, fuel should account for approximately 11% and 13% of net cruise revenues,
and 16% and 18% of net cruise costs, for Carnival and Royal Caribbean,
respectively.
Historically, there have periods when there was a high inverse correlation between
the price of bunker fuel and stock prices—that relationship of late has greatly
dissipated. Between 2005 and 2006, the correlation coefficient between stock prices
and the cost of IFO-380 was 0.76 and 0.79 for Carnival and Royal Caribbean,
respectively. We note that this high correlation began in 2005 when fuel prices
increased significantly. Since that point, the relationship between bunker prices and
cruise stocks significantly abated. We believe this will remain the case until the price
of bunker significantly outpaces (to the upside or downside) the importance of net
yields (ticket prices and onboard revenue). Interestingly, both Carnival and Royal
Caribbean stock prices and the price of bunker fuel have moved in tandem in 2008
and 2009 (correlation coefficients of 0.78 and 0.68 for Carnival and Royal
Caribbean, respectively), which is largely a result of both bunker and the stocks
rebounding from lows in late 2008/early 2009.
In addition, we continue to see added benefits from new, more fuel-efficient capacity
and from fuel-conservation initiatives, such as technological innovations and
restructuring itineraries. We estimate that a 10% change in fuel cost per metric ton
would affect our 2010 EPS estimates by approximately $0.20 per share for Carnival
and approximately $0.16 per share for Royal Caribbean.
52
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
$70 $0
$60 $100
$200
$50
$300
$40
$400
$30
$500
$20
$600
$10 $700
$0 $800
7/31/02
1/31/03
7/31/03
1/31/04
7/31/04
1/31/05
7/31/05
1/31/06
7/31/06
1/31/07
7/31/07
1/31/08
7/31/08
1/31/09
7/31/09
CCL Stock Price RCL Stock Price Worldw ide Av erage, IFO-380
North American Av erage, IFO-380 Intl. Av erage, IFO-380
53
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Analyst Certification:
The research analyst(s) denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple research analysts are primarily
responsible for this report, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover or within the document individually certifies, with
respect to each security or issuer that the research analyst covers in this research) that: (1) all of the views expressed in this report
accurately reflect his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of any of the research
analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the
research analyst(s) in this report.
Important Disclosures
• Market Maker/ Liquidity Provider: JPMSL and/or an affiliate is a market maker and/or liquidity provider in Carnival Corporation,
Royal Caribbean Cruises.
• Client of the Firm: Carnival Corporation is or was in the past 12 months a client of JPMSI; during the past 12 months, JPMSI
provided to the company investment banking services, non-investment banking securities-related services and non-securities-related
services. Royal Caribbean Cruises is or was in the past 12 months a client of JPMSI; during the past 12 months, JPMSI provided to
the company investment banking services, non-investment banking securities-related services and non-securities-related services.
• Investment Banking (past 12 months): JPMSI or its affiliates received in the past 12 months compensation for investment banking
services from Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises.
• Investment Banking (next 3 months): JPMSI or its affiliates expect to receive, or intend to seek, compensation for investment
banking services in the next three months from Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises.
• Non-Investment Banking Compensation: JPMSI has received compensation in the past 12 months for products or services other
than investment banking from Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises. An affiliate of JPMSI has received compensation in
the past 12 months for products or services other than investment banking from Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises.
32
16
0
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan
06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 10
Source: Bloomberg and J.P. Morgan; price data adjusted for stock splits and dividends.
Break in coverage May 31, 2008 - Jun 02, 2008. This chart shows J.P. Morgan's continuing coverage of this stock; the
current analyst may or may not have covered it over the entire period.
J.P. Morgan ratings: OW = Overweight, N = Neutral, UW = Underweight.
54
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
80
Date Rating Share Price Price Target
($) ($)
10-Oct-06 N 39.65 --
64 13-Jul-07 OW 40.39 --
02-Jun-08 N 30.41 --
48
N OW N N $9 29-Jan-09 N 9.06 9.00
Price($)
32
16
0
Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan
06 07 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 10
Source: Bloomberg and J.P. Morgan; price data adjusted for stock splits and dividends.
Break in coverage May 31, 2008 - Jun 02, 2008. This chart shows J.P. Morgan's continuing coverage of this stock; the
current analyst may or may not have covered it over the entire period.
J.P. Morgan ratings: OW = Overweight, N = Neutral, UW = Underweight.
Valuation and Risks: Please see the most recent company-specific research report for an analysis of valuation methodology and risks on
any securities recommended herein. Research is available at http://www.morganmarkets.com , or you can contact the analyst named on
the front of this note or your J.P. Morgan representative.
Analysts’ Compensation: The equity research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based upon
various factors, including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors, and overall firm revenues, which
include revenues from, among other business units, Institutional Equities and Investment Banking.
Other Disclosures
J.P. Morgan is the global brand name for J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMSI) and its non-US affiliates worldwide.
55
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
Options related research: If the information contained herein regards options related research, such information is available only to persons who
have received the proper option risk disclosure documents. For a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation’s Characteristics and Risks of
Standardized Options, please contact your J.P. Morgan Representative or visit the OCC’s website at
http://www.optionsclearing.com/publications/risks/riskstoc.pdf.
Legal Entities Disclosures
U.S.: JPMSI is a member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC. J.P. Morgan Futures Inc. is a member of the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a
member of FDIC and is authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. U.K.: J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. (JPMSL) is a
member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England & Wales No.
2711006. Registered Office 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AJ. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities Limited is a member of the Johannesburg
Securities Exchange and is regulated by the FSB. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ321) is regulated
by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Korea: J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd,
Seoul Branch, is regulated by the Korea Financial Supervisory Service. Australia: J.P. Morgan Australia Limited (ABN 52 002 888 011/AFS
Licence No: 238188) is regulated by ASIC and J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is a
Market Participant with the ASX and regulated by ASIC. Taiwan: J.P.Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a participant of the Taiwan Stock
Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures Bureau. India: J.P. Morgan India Private Limited is a member of
the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India. Thailand: JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Limited is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by the Ministry of
Finance and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock
Exchange and is regulated by the BAPEPAM LK. Philippines: J.P. Morgan Securities Philippines Inc. is a member of the Philippine Stock
Exchange and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Brazil: Banco J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the Comissao de Valores
Mobiliarios (CVM) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Mexico: J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero is a
member of the Mexican Stock Exchange and authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange Commission.
Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS) [MICA (P)
132/01/2009 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R] which is a member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and is regulated by the
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore) which is regulated by the
MAS. Malaysia: This material is issued and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X) which is a
Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Berhad and a holder of Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in
Malaysia. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission of Pakistan. Saudi Arabia: J.P. Morgan Saudi Arabia Ltd. is authorised by the Capital Market Authority of the Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia (CMA) to carry out dealing as an agent, arranging, advising and custody, with respect to securities business under licence number
35-07079 and its registered address is at 8th Floor, Al-Faisaliyah Tower, King Fahad Road, P.O. Box 51907, Riyadh 11553, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. Dubai: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and its registered
address is Dubai International Financial Centre - Building 3, Level 7, PO Box 506551, Dubai, UAE.
Country and Region Specific Disclosures
U.K. and European Economic Area (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, issued and approved for distribution in the U.K. and the EEA by
JPMSL. Investment research issued by JPMSL has been prepared in accordance with JPMSL's policies for managing conflicts of interest arising
as a result of publication and distribution of investment research. Many European regulators require that a firm to establish, implement and
maintain such a policy. This report has been issued in the U.K. only to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons being referred to as "relevant persons"). This document must
not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only
available to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. In other EEA countries, the report has been issued to persons
regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in their home jurisdiction. Australia: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in
Australia to “wholesale clients” only. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to “retail clients.” The recipient of this material must not
distribute it to any third party or outside Australia without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. For the purposes of this paragraph the terms
“wholesale client” and “retail client” have the meanings given to them in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. Germany: This material is
distributed in Germany by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Frankfurt Branch and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Frankfurt Branch which are
regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Hong Kong: The 1% ownership disclosure as of the previous month end
satisfies the requirements under Paragraph 16.5(a) of the Hong Kong Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities
and Futures Commission. (For research published within the first ten days of the month, the disclosure may be based on the month end data from
two months’ prior.) J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited is the liquidity provider for derivative warrants issued by J.P. Morgan Structured
Products B.V. and listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. An updated list can be found on HKEx website:
http://www.hkex.com.hk/prod/dw/Lp.htm. Japan: There is a risk that a loss may occur due to a change in the price of the shares in the case of
share trading, and that a loss may occur due to the exchange rate in the case of foreign share trading. In the case of share trading, JPMorgan
Securities Japan Co., Ltd., will be receiving a brokerage fee and consumption tax (shouhizei) calculated by multiplying the executed price by the
commission rate which was individually agreed between JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., and the customer in advance. Financial Instruments
Firms: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., Kanto Local Finance Bureau (kinsho) No. 82 Participating Association / Japan Securities Dealers
Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan. Korea: This report may have been edited or contributed to from time to time by
affiliates of J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul Branch. Singapore: JPMSS and/or its affiliates may have a holding in any of the
securities discussed in this report; for securities where the holding is 1% or greater, the specific holding is disclosed in the Important Disclosures
section above. India: For private circulation only, not for sale. Pakistan: For private circulation only, not for sale. New Zealand: This
material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand only to persons whose principal business is the investment of money or who, in the
course of and for the purposes of their business, habitually invest money. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to members of "the
public" as determined in accordance with section 3 of the Securities Act 1978. The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third
56
Kevin Milota North America Equity Research
(1-212) 622-0987 16 December 2009
kevin.milota@jpmorgan.com
party or outside New Zealand without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. Canada: The information contained herein is not, and under no
circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus, an advertisement, a public offering, an offer to sell securities described herein, or solicitation of
an offer to buy securities described herein, in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in
Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only
by a dealer properly registered under applicable securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the dealer registration requirement
in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made. The information contained herein is under no circumstances to
be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. To the extent that the
information contained herein references securities of an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of Canada or a province or territory
of Canada, any trades in such securities must be conducted through a dealer registered in Canada. No securities commission or similar regulatory
authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed judgment upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the
securities described herein, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Dubai: This report has been issued to persons regarded as
professional clients as defined under the DFSA rules.
General: Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan
Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any
disclosures relative to JPMSI and/or its affiliates and the analyst’s involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the research. All pricing is as
of the close of market for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this
material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or
solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual
client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to
particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments
mentioned herein. JPMSI distributes in the U.S. research published by non-U.S. affiliates and accepts responsibility for its contents. Periodic
updates may be provided on companies/industries based on company specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other
publicly available information. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home
jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.
“Other Disclosures” last revised December 7, 2009.
Copyright 2009 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or
redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan.
57