This document summarizes two Supreme Court cases that challenged the Commission on Elections' approval of 154 organizations and political parties to participate in the 2001 party-list elections in the Philippines. The petitioners argued that the party-list system was intended to benefit marginalized groups, not mainstream political parties or the non-marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while the party-list system aims to proportionally represent marginalized sectors, political parties can participate if they meet the requirements in the Constitution and relevant law, which do not explicitly prohibit political parties from participating. It is up to the Commission on Elections to determine proportional representation and ensure the goals of representing the marginalized are upheld.
This document summarizes two Supreme Court cases that challenged the Commission on Elections' approval of 154 organizations and political parties to participate in the 2001 party-list elections in the Philippines. The petitioners argued that the party-list system was intended to benefit marginalized groups, not mainstream political parties or the non-marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while the party-list system aims to proportionally represent marginalized sectors, political parties can participate if they meet the requirements in the Constitution and relevant law, which do not explicitly prohibit political parties from participating. It is up to the Commission on Elections to determine proportional representation and ensure the goals of representing the marginalized are upheld.
This document summarizes two Supreme Court cases that challenged the Commission on Elections' approval of 154 organizations and political parties to participate in the 2001 party-list elections in the Philippines. The petitioners argued that the party-list system was intended to benefit marginalized groups, not mainstream political parties or the non-marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while the party-list system aims to proportionally represent marginalized sectors, political parties can participate if they meet the requirements in the Constitution and relevant law, which do not explicitly prohibit political parties from participating. It is up to the Commission on Elections to determine proportional representation and ensure the goals of representing the marginalized are upheld.
This document summarizes two Supreme Court cases that challenged the Commission on Elections' approval of 154 organizations and political parties to participate in the 2001 party-list elections in the Philippines. The petitioners argued that the party-list system was intended to benefit marginalized groups, not mainstream political parties or the non-marginalized. The Supreme Court ruled that while the party-list system aims to proportionally represent marginalized sectors, political parties can participate if they meet the requirements in the Constitution and relevant law, which do not explicitly prohibit political parties from participating. It is up to the Commission on Elections to determine proportional representation and ensure the goals of representing the marginalized are upheld.
ANG BAGONG BAYANI-OFW LABOR PARTY (under the acronym OFW), represented herein by its secretary-general, MOHAMMAD OMAR FAJARDO, petitioner, vs. ANG BAGONG BAYANI-OFW LABOR PARTY GO! GO! PHILIPPINES; THE TRUE MARCOS LOYALIST ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES; PHILIPPINE LOCAL AUTONOMY; CITIZENS MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE, ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND PEACE; CHAMBER OF REAL ESTATE BUILDERS ASSOCIATION; SPORTS & HEALTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; ANG LAKAS NG OVERSEAS CONTRACT WORKERS (OCW); BAGONG BAYANI ORGANIZATION and others under "Organizations/Coalitions" of Omnibus Resolution No. 3785; PARTIDO NG MASANG PILIPINO; LAKAS NUCD-UMDP; NATIONALIST PEOPLE'S COALITION; LABAN NG DEMOKRATIKONG PILIPINO; AKSYON DEMOKRATIKO; PDP-LABAN; LIBERAL PARTY; NACIONALISTA PARTY; ANG BUHAY HAYAANG YUMABONG; and others under "Political Parties" of Omnibus Resolution No. 3785. respondents.
G.R. No. 147613 June 26, 2001 BAYAN MUNA, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS; NATIONALIST PEOPLE'S COALITION (NPC); LABAN NG DEMOKRATIKONG PILIPINO (LDP); PARTIDO NG MASANG PILIPINO (PMP); LAKAS-NUCD-UMDP; LIBERAL PARTY; MAMAMAYANG AYAW SA DROGA; CREBA; NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUGARCANE PLANTERS; JEEP; and BAGONG BAYANI ORGANIZATION, respondents.
Facts:
Petitioners challenged the Comelecs Omnibus Resolution No. 3785, which approved the participation of 154 organizations and parties, including those herein impleaded, in the 2001 party-list elections. Petitioners sought the disqualification of private respondents, arguing mainly that the party-list system was intended to benefit the marginalized and underrepresented; not the mainstream political parties, the non-marginalized or overrepresented. Unsatisfied with the pace by which Comelec acted on their petition, petitioners elevated the issue to the Supreme Court.
Issue: WON political parties may participate in the party-list elections?
HELD: YES. Political parties even the major ones -- may participate in the party-list elections subject to the requirements laid down in the Constitution and RA 7941, which is the statutory law pertinent to the Party List System.
Under the Constitution and RA 7941, private respondents cannot be disqualified from the party- list elections, merely on the ground that they are political parties. Section 5, Article VI of the Constitution provides that members of the House of Representatives may "be elected through a party-list system of registered national, regional, and sectoral parties or organizations . It is however, incumbent upon the Comelec to determine proportional representation of the marginalized and underrepresented, the criteria for participation, in relation to the cause of the party list applicants so as to avoid desecration of the noble purpose of the party-list system.