This document provides an overview of money laundering including:
- The origins of the term "money laundering" which came from Mafia gangsters in the US hiding illicit cash proceeds through businesses like laundromats.
- Early money laundering techniques involved disguising illegal funds through front businesses and using foreign banks like in Switzerland.
- Money laundering has existed for thousands of years but gained attention in the 1980s due to large drug trafficking profits.
- Money laundering has significant negative economic impacts by damaging financial institutions, encouraging crime/corruption, and distorting trade flows.
This document provides an overview of money laundering including:
- The origins of the term "money laundering" which came from Mafia gangsters in the US hiding illicit cash proceeds through businesses like laundromats.
- Early money laundering techniques involved disguising illegal funds through front businesses and using foreign banks like in Switzerland.
- Money laundering has existed for thousands of years but gained attention in the 1980s due to large drug trafficking profits.
- Money laundering has significant negative economic impacts by damaging financial institutions, encouraging crime/corruption, and distorting trade flows.
This document provides an overview of money laundering including:
- The origins of the term "money laundering" which came from Mafia gangsters in the US hiding illicit cash proceeds through businesses like laundromats.
- Early money laundering techniques involved disguising illegal funds through front businesses and using foreign banks like in Switzerland.
- Money laundering has existed for thousands of years but gained attention in the 1980s due to large drug trafficking profits.
- Money laundering has significant negative economic impacts by damaging financial institutions, encouraging crime/corruption, and distorting trade flows.
The term "money laundering" is said to originate from Mafia ownership of Laundromats in the United States. Gangsters were earning huge sums in cash from extortion, prostitution, gambling and bootleg liquor. The major headache that gangsters faced was that the money was in cash, often in small denomination coins. If the coins were put into the bank, the questions would be asked. But the storage of large amounts of money in low value coins is a storage nightmare. They needed to show a legitimate source for these monies. Ironically, one of the methods of concealing the source of the money was legal gambling. So they created businesses, one of which was slot machines, and another of which was laundries - so, it is said, that the term "money laundry" was born.
One of the ways in which they were able to do this was by purchasing outwardly legitimate businesses and to mix their illicit earnings with the legitimate earnings they received from these businesses. Laundromats were chosen by these gangsters because they were cash businesses and this was an undoubted advantage to people like Al Capone who purchased them.
Al Capone, however, was prosecuted and convicted in October, 1931 for tax evasion. It was this that he was sent to prison for rather than the predicate crimes which generated his illicit income. It would seem, however, that the conviction of Al Capone for tax evasion may have been the trigger for getting the money laundering business off the ground.
Meyer Lansky (affectionately called the Mobs Accountant) was particularly influenced by the conviction of Capone for something as obvious as tax evasion. Determined that the same fate would not befall him he set about searching for ways to hide money. Before the year was out he had discovered the benefits of numbered Swiss Bank Accounts. This is 2 where money laundering would seem to have started and was one of the most influential money launderers ever. The use of the Swiss facilities gave Lansky the means to incorporate one of the first real laundering techniques, the use of the loan-back concept, which meant that hitherto illegal money could now be disguised by loans provided by compliant foreign banks, which could be declared to the revenue if necessary, and a tax- deduction obtained into the bargain.
Money laundering as an expression is one of fairly recent origin. The original sighting was in newspapers reporting the Watergate scandal in the United States in 1973. The expression first appeared in a judicial or legal context in 1982 in America in the case US v $4,255,625.39 (1982) 551 F Supp.314. Since then, the term Money Laundering has been widely accepted and is in popular usage throughout the world.
But whilst the term "money laundering" was invented in the 20th Century, the principles of money laundering have been around for far longer. Sterling Seagrave in his book "Lords of the Rim" conducts a roundup of the history of the Overseas Chinese. He explains how the abuse of merchants and others by rulers led them to find ways to hide their wealth, including ways of moving it around without it being identified and confiscated. Money laundering in this sense was prevalent 4000 years before Christ.
"Money laundering is called what it is because that perfectly describes what takes place - illegal, or dirty, money is put through a cycle of transactions, or washed, so that it comes out the other end as legal, or clean, money. In other words, the source of illegally obtained funds is obscured through a succession of transfers and deals in order that those same funds can eventually be made to appear as legitimate income".
Money laundering as a crime only attracted interest in the 1980s, essentially within a drug trafficking context. It was from an increasing awareness of the huge profits generated from this criminal activity and a concern at the massive drug abuse problem in western society which created the impetus for governments to act against the drug dealers by creating legislation that would deprive them of their illicit gains. 3 Money laundering today is a truly global phenomenon, helped by the International financial community which is a 24hrs a day business. When one financial centre closes business for the day, another one is opening or open for business.
1.2 IMPORTANCE AND RELEVANCE OF THE STUDY
Money laundering has become the buzzword for a developing country like India. India has been witnessing huge capital inflows in the recent past and such flows are getting channeled into various investment avenues such as stock markets and other related investment vehicles. With India witnessing such huge flows it has become very important that India does not attract such black money to its financial hubs merely as a tool to convert black money to white.
Further as the countries of the west enforce stringent anti-money laundering controls, launderers are looking at developing countries as attractive destinations to launder their funds. The impact of black money entering the developing countries can be severe. Thus India must adhere to high anti-money laundering standards so as to check such black money entering its economy.
1.3 LITTERATURE REVIEW
Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so that they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them. Through money laundering, the launderer transforms the monetary proceeds derived from criminal activity into funds with an apparently legal source. Money laundering is regarded as the worlds third largest industry after international oil trade and foreign exchange (Robinson, 1995). The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated the size of money laundering worldwide to be between US$600 million and US$1.5 trillion, which is about 2-5 per cent of the worlds GDP (Camdessus, 1998).
4 With the globalisation of economic activities and of financial markets, money can be now laundered internationally. Money laundering allocates dirty money around the world not so much on the basis of expected rates of return but on the basis of ease of avoiding national controls. Dirty money tends to flow to countries with less stringent controls (Tanzi, Vito. 1996).
Much of the research studies which have been carried out have focused on the areas on money laundering through banks and financial institutions, with much attention being paid to developed countries and offshore financial centres. (Baity 2000 & Hampton 1996)
Money laundering and measures to counter it have become the focus of an intense international effort. The wide range of activities and financial instruments involved in money laundering are not directly observable and estimates are difficult to compile. According to Baker (1999), the combination of criminal money laundering and illegal flight capital constitutes the biggest loophole in the free-market system.
A number of studies have elaborated the numerous domestic, international and private measures which have been established to fight money laundering, relevant legislation and the activity of regulatory and professional bodies both domestically and internationally. International efforts to combat money laundering have gained momentum in the past decade. United Nations Convention and another planned convention, along with numerous multilateral governmental initiatives and bilateral agreements, have contributed to the development of a broad set of national and international legal standards. However, this emergent regime has developed unevenly, the most significant advances occurring in regions dominated by the United States and its allies (Castle and Bruce 1998)
The negative economic effects of money laundering on economic development are difficult to quantify. Such activity damages the financial-sector institutions that are critical to economic growth, reduces productivity in the economy's real sector by 5 diverting resources and encouraging crime and corruption, which slow economic growth, and can distort the economy's external sectorinternational trade and capital flowsto the detriment of long-term economic development (Bartlett 2002). When the integrity of the financial institutions is weak, it has a discouraging effect on foreign direct investment due to lack of investor confidence. This in turn can distort the long-term growth of the economy. Studies by Quirk (1997), Barrett (1997), Paradise (1998) and also Masciandaro and Portolano (2003) have argued that money laundering threatens economic and financial systems in countries.
Jurisdictions which offer high levels of secrecy, and a variety of financial mechanisms and institutions providing anonymity for the beneficial owners are highly attractive to criminals for a wide variety of reasons including the potential cover and protection they offer for money laundering and various exercises in financial fraud (Blum 1998). Historically, it has been argued that offshore financial centres (OFCs) have facilitated money laundering by providing a conduit for the proceeds of crime. Popular culture, international bureaucracies, left-wing interest groups, and politicians from high tax governments have all joined forces to consistently portray OFCs as havens for dirty money where the authorities are either unwilling or unable to implement measures in their islands to assist in the global fight against money laundering (Mitchell, 2002).
Money laundering through banking system is doubly difficult to identify as well as control, mainly because KYC is difficult to implement, because there is no obvious end point to the information that would be useful to a bank manager in seeking to prevent money laundering, and it will be hard to deal with third-party introducers (where the main beneficiaries wish to remain anonymous), and it can be hard to balance KYC with a customers right to privacy (Jackson 2000).
No major research study has been carried out on money laundering through capital markets as a tool. The present study tries to examine the problem of money laundering through capital markets from the point of view of using capital market intermediaries and 6 instruments as channels to launder money. The present study tries to fill the gap existing with respect to comparison between development of domestic as well as international legislation for prevention of money laundering, identifying the socio-economic impact of money laundering on developing economy such as India, assessing the anti-money laundering compliances used to deter laundering of money through capital markets in India.
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. To compare and contrast various money laundering methods/techniques being practiced in India and abroad
2. To assess and evaluate socio-economic impact of money laundering activities as a whole to the economy, with special focus on financial markets
3. To compare and contrast legislative measures presently existing for anti-money laundering in India and abroad.
4. To examine the checks used by stock brokers and intermediaries for ensuring effective anti-money laundering compliance.
1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sources of Data: The Methodology for the project is based on Secondary sources of Data. The collection of primary data was not possible. This is because by its very nature, money laundering is an illegal activity carried out by people with criminal intent which occurs outside of the normal range of economic and financial statistics and hence data on such activities is scant. And also money laundering activities are making full use of newer technologies and offshore jurisdictions to conceal the proceeds of crime. Public sources of data were chiefly relied on for the study; primarily the regulatory agencies that are entrusted with 7 the job of curbing money laundering activities and from Organizations that collect data and publish newsletters and reports from the governmental agencies and multilateral law enforcement agencies. Other resources that were utilized in the course of project work were, websites accessed via internet, journals, newspapers and magazines. Further additional sources of information utilized were circulars issued by SEBI (Securities Exchange Board of India) and Bombay Stock Exchange on Anti-Money Laundering compliances by financial intermediaries.
1.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The present study is mainly based on secondary sources of data because money laundering is a secretive activity and hence primary sources of data could not be obtained. So the inherent limitations of secondary source of data may be termed as a limitation of this study.
Money Laundering is an illegal activity and the techniques used to launder money tend to fluctuate dramatically. Hence exact quantity of money laundered and latest techniques used to launder money could not be obtained.
Financing of terrorism is a topic which has come to attract serious attention in recent times. And combating Financing of Terrorism has become an integral part of anti-money laundering efforts. Since the purpose of terrorist financing is very different from that of money laundering and the scope of the terrorist financing is a very wide, hence for the purpose of this project the scope of this study has been restricted to money laundering only.
1.7 CHAPTERISATION SCHEME
The entire project work is divided into seven parts for the purpose of simplification and easy understanding. The seven parts as shown in seven chapters are as follows. 8 Chapter I: Introduction to Money Laundering This chapter comprises of background of money laundering, importance and relevance of the study, literature review, objectives of the study, research methodology, limitations of the study and chapterisation scheme.
Chapter II: Money Laundering This chapter comprises of introduction to the chapter, stages in the money laundering process, techniques used by launderers to launder money and the principal laundering methods detected or suspected in India.
Chapter III: Money Laundering Through Capital Markets This chapter comprises of introduction to the laundering through securities market, money laundering through international financial market, money laundering through stock exchanges in India and conclusion.
Chapter IV: Impact of Money Laundering This chapter comprises of introduction to the chapter, problem for emerging markets, impact of money laundering and conclusion.
Chapter V: International and Domestic Initiatives Against Money Laundering This chapter comprises of introduction to the chapter, anti-money laundering legislations and initiatives and conclusion.
Chapter VI: Anti-Money Laundering Measures and Compliances This chapter comprises of introduction to the chapter, anti-money laundering measures and compliances to combat against money laundering and conclusion
Chapter VII: Findings, Conclusions and Suggestions This chapter comprises of introduction to the chapter, summary, findings and conclusion. 9 CHAPTER 2: MONEY LAUNDERING
2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter looks to understand the concept of money laundering and its global size. A typical money laundering exercise goes through a series of stages, each stage in the series has its own particular distinctive characteristics. Hence it is important to assess the particular characteristics which distinguish each stage. Money launderers use a variety of methods and techniques to launder funds, each stage in the money laundering process utilizes certain methods and techniques. This chapter has sought to delve into these methods. Further it is also important to understand the methods and techniques used to launder funds in the Indian context.
2.2 MONEY LAUNDERING? Illegal arms sales, smuggling, and the activities of organised crime, including for example drug trafficking and prostitution rings, can generate huge amounts of proceeds. Embezzlement, insider trading, bribery and computer fraud schemes can also produce large profits and create the incentive to legitimise the ill-gotten gains through money laundering.
When a criminal activity generates substantial profits, the individual or group involved must find a way to control the funds without attracting attention to the underlying activity or the persons involved. Criminals do this by disguising the sources, changing the form, or moving the funds to a place where they are less likely to attract attention.
Money laundering is the criminal practice of filtering ill-gotten gains or dirty money through a series of transactions, so that the funds are cleaned to look like proceeds from legal activities. Money laundering is driven by criminal activities and conceals the true source, ownership, or use of funds. Money laundering involves the taking the proceeds of crime and creating the illusion that the person who uses that wealth has obtained it by legal and lawful means. Money laundering is the processing of criminal proceeds to 10 disguise their illegal origin. This process is of critical importance, as it enables the criminal to enjoy these profits without jeopardising their source.
As a 1993 UN Report noted: The basic characteristics of the laundering of the proceeds of crime, which to a large extent also marks the operations of organised and transnational crime, are its global nature, the flexibility and adaptability of its operations, the use of the latest technological means and professional assistance, the ingenuity of its operators and the vast resources at their disposal.
2.2.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF MONEY LAUNDERING 1. Money laundering is a group activity 2. Money laundering is a criminal activity and once begun, normally there is no end to it. 3. Money Laundering recognizes no boundaries. It has been internationalized. 4. Money Laundering activities do not end on one transaction. These involve a chain of transactions and are undertaken at a large scale 5. Money Laundering activities involve very sophisticated and complex process
In most financial transactions, there is a financial trail to link the funds to the person(s) involved. Criminals avoid using traditional payment systems, such as checks, credit cards, etc., because of this paper trail. They prefer to use cash because it is anonymous. Physical cash, however, has disadvantages. It is bulky and difficult to move. For example, 44 pounds of cocaine worth $1 million equals 256 pounds of street cash worth $1 million. The street cash is more than six times the weight of the drugs. The existing payment systems and cash are both problems for criminals. Regulations and banking controls have increased costs and risks. The physical movement of large quantities of cash is the money launderers biggest problem. Money laundering is a diverse and often complex process that need not involve cash transactions. Money laundering basically involves three independent stages that can occur simultaneously:
11 2.3 STAGES IN THE MONEY LAUNDERING PROCESS
2.3.1 PLACEMENT Placement is the first stage in the money laundering process. It is during the placement stage that physical currency enters the financial system placing, through deposits or other means, unlawful proceeds into the financial system and illegal proceeds are most vulnerable to detection. When illicit monies are deposited at a financial institution, placement has occurred.
2.3.2 LAYERING Layering describes an activity intended to obscure the trail which is left by dirty money this is done by separating proceeds of criminal activity from their origin through the use of layers of complex financial transactions. During the layering stage, a launderer may conduct a series of financial transactions in order to build layers between the funds and their illicit source. For example, a series of bank-to-bank funds transfers would constitute layering. Activities of this nature, particularly when they involve funds transfers between tax haven and bank secrecy jurisdictions, can make it very difficult for investigators to follow the trail of money.
2.3.3 INTEGRATION During the final stage in the laundering process, using additional transactions to create the appearance of legality through the purchase of assets illicit funds are integrated with monies from legitimate commercial activities as they enter the mainstream economy. The illicit funds thus take on the appearance of legitimacy. The integration of illicit monies into a legitimate economy is very difficult to detect unless an audit trail had been established during the placement or layering stages.
12 TABLE 2.1: Stage Wise Classification Of Money Laundering Activity Money laundering is generally described as a three-stage process intended to make the profits or proceeds of crime appear legitimate. 1. In the initial or placement stage of money laundering, the launderer introduces the criminal proceeds into the financial system This might be done by breaking up large amounts of cash into less obvious smaller sums that are then deposited directly into a bank account. The criminal might put the money into other forms such as cheques or money orders that are then collected and deposited into accounts at another location.
It is at this stage that potential money laundering can be most easily detected. 2. After the funds have entered the financial system, the secondlayering stage takes place. In this phase, the launderer engages in a series of changes, or moves the funds several times to create distance from the source. The funds might be used to buy and sell investments such as stocks and bonds. The launderer might wire the funds through a series of accounts at various banks around the world.
In some instances, the launderer might disguise the transfers as payments for goods or services. This would give them a legitimate appearance. 3. Having successfully processed the criminal proceeds through the first two phases of the money laundering process, the launderer then moves them to the third stageintegrationin which the funds re-enter the legitimate economy The launderer might choose to invest the funds in real estate, luxury assets, or business ventures.
At this third stage, it is very difficult to distinguish between legal and illegal funds.
13 FIG 2.1: Stages In Money Laundering Process Source: How stuff works 2005
TABLE 2.2: Summarises The Procedure Depicted In Fig 2.1 PLACEMENT STAGE LAYERING STAGE INTEGRATION STAGE Cash paid into bank (sometimes with staff complicity or mixed with proceeds of legitimate business) Wire transfers abroad (often using shell companies or funds disguised as proceeds of legitimate business) False loan repayments or forged invoices used as cover for laundered money. Cash exported. Cash deposited in overseas banking system Complex web of transfers (both domestic and international) makes tracing original source of funds virtually impossible. Cash used to buy high value goods, property or business assets. Resale of goods/assets. Income from property or legitimate business assets appears "clean".
14 FIG 2.2: Depicts The Estimates Of Money Laundered In Different Regions Of The World According To Different Research Agencies And Governmental Organizations. 42.8 45.5 60 179 231.3 257 325.5 590 856.6 1500 2850 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Billions (USD) 1 E s t i m a t e Extent of Money Laundering Model Estimate Worldwide (John Walker 1998) High Estimate Worldwide (IMF 1996) Worldwide (Private Research Firm 2002) Low Estmate Worldwide (IMF 1996) Americas (Private Research Firm 2002) Asia/ Pacific (Private Research Firm 2002) Europe (Private Research Firm 2002) United States (US Government 2003) Caribbean (CFATF 2000) United Kingdom (UK Government 2003) Middle/East Africa (Private Research Firm 2002)
Source: Kenneth Bryant
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has estimated that the aggregate size of the ill- gotten proceeds has increased from circa 2% of global GDP in the early 1990s to around 3.5% today, which translates to a whopping US$ 1.5trillion to US$ 2.4trillion annual problem based on a global GDP of US$48.3trillion in 2006. Money laundering now ranks as the third largest business globally after foreign exchange and oil.
However it must be understood that overall it is absolutely impossible to produce a reliable estimate of the amount of money laundered.
In response to mounting concern over money laundering, the Financial Action Task Force on money laundering (FATF) was established by the G-7 Summit in Paris in 1989 to develop a co-ordinated international response. One of the first tasks of the FATF was 15 to develop Recommendations, 40 in all, which set out the measures national governments should take to implement effective anti-money laundering programmes.
TABLE 2.3: Differences Between Money Laundering And Terrorist Financing Money Laundering Financing of Terrorism Definition Processing of proceeds of crimes to disguise their illegal origin and use them in the legal economy Use of funds from legal or illicit sources to finance terrorist activities Source of funds From illegal activities Can be from legal sources (donations from charitable organization or individuals) Use of funds To legitimize illegal funds Funding of terrorist activities, may be in small amounts difficult to detect.
TABLE 2.4: Stage Wise Classification of Techniques/Methods Used by Money Launderers PLACEMENT LAYERING INTEGRATION Smurfing Tax Haven and Offshore Banks Use of haven bank credit cards Shipping Money Abroad Bank Secrecy Receiving as consulting or director fee Placement through Banks Corporations and Shell companies Arrangement of corporate loans Use of Pass through or Payable through accounts Use of trusts Proceeds of gambling Electronic Wire transfer Use of walking accounts Real estate transaction Insurance Products Establishing self owned bank accounts Stock purchase Investment related transaction Use of Intermediaries Use of Business NBFC International importing and exporting
16 2.4 TECHNIQUES USED BY MONEY LAUNDERERS TO LAUNDER MONEY
2.4.1 Structuring Deposits/ Smurfing Also known as smurfing, this method entails breaking up large amounts of money into smaller, less-suspicious amounts. The money is then deposited into one or more bank accounts either by multiple people (smurfs) or by a single person over an extended period of time.
2.4.2 Offshore Banks Offshore banks are banks that allow for the establishment of accounts from non-resident individuals and corporations. A number of countries have well-developed offshore banking sectors. Offshore banks are popular with money launderers (for layering funds), tax evaders and corrupt officials.
In contrast, a shell bank is incorporated in and authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country, but does not have a physical place of business or any employees in that country.
Money launderers often send money through various "offshore accounts" in countries that have bank secrecy laws, meaning that for all intents and purposes, these countries allow anonymous banking. A complex scheme can involve hundreds of bank transfers to and from offshore banks. According to the International Monetary Fund, "major offshore centers" include the Bahamas, Bahrain, the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Antilles, Panama and Singapore
The financial centres that host offshore banks can be very large and help facilitate many illegitimate cross-border financings. For example, the Cayman Islands are estimated to be the fifth largest financial centre in the world. Some offshore centres combine loose anti- money laundering procedures with strict bank secrecy rules. Criminals can easily 17 maintain and transfer funds from banks in these centres because details of client activities are generally denied to third parties, including most law enforcement agencies.
2.4.3 Underground/Alternative Banking This includes the hawala system in Pakistan and India and the fie chen system in China, the Padala in the Philippines, the Hui Kuan in Hong Kong, and the Phei Kwan in Thailand. Hawala is an alternative or parallel remittance system. It exists and operates outside of, or parallel to 'traditional' banking or financial channels. It was developed in India, before the introduction of western banking practices, and is currently a major remittance system used around the world. The RBI estimates that remittances to India sent through legal and formal channels in 2007-2008 amounted to $42.6 billion. It is but one of several such systems; another well known example is the 'chop', 'chit' or 'flying money' system indigenous to China, and also, used around the world. These systems are often referred to as 'underground banking'; this term is not always correct, as they often operate in the open with complete legitimacy, and these services are often heavily and effectively advertised. Some countries in Asia have well-established, legal alternative banking systems that allow for undocumented deposits, withdrawals and transfers. These are trust-based systems, often with ancient roots, that leave no paper trail and operate outside of government control.
Hawala channels transmit billions of dollars of funds with impressive speed. As an alternative remittances system or Informal Value Transfer System (IVTS), hawala has found support among a variety of sources, including large international companies and local community-based networks. They offer numerous services, employing couriers to deliver money and intermediaries to deliver gifts or payments in kind, making quick transfers across countries that come with no cash deliveries. The settlement takes place between one hawaladar (the intermediary commander) and another (the intermediary receiver). Upon hearing from a customer who seeks a remittance transfer, the commander phones the final recipient with an identification 18 number. The receiver awaits the man with the number, provides cash in local currency, and takes a premium of about two percent. Herein lies the main elements of the system: trust, oral communication, and anonymity. There is complete secrecy in content, form, and procedure. Furthermore, with a coding system for identification, virtually no physical movement of cash, and a code of honor that quickly weeds out the disingenuous, it is no surprise that counterterrorism agencies see hawala as a black box. The very characteristics that account for hawalas success have made it an impenetrable haven for illicit and criminal transactions.
2.4.4 Shell Companies These are fake companies that exist for no other reason than to launder money. They take in dirty money as "payment" for supposed goods or services but actually provide no goods or services; they simply create the appearance of legitimate transactions through fake invoices and balance sheets. A shell corporation is a company that is formally established under applicable corporate laws but does not actually conduct a business. Instead, it is used to engage in fictitious transactions or hold accounts and assets to disguise the actual ownership of these accounts and assets.
Sophisticated money launderers use a complex maze of shell corporations in different countries. Most money transfers take place through these shell corporations. At times, money is transferred through numbered accounts rather than through named accounts. To further avoid unwanted attention, money launderers build the transaction history of the shell corporation so that it looks as if it has been in business for a long time.
In many countries (particularly offshore banking centres), the reporting and record- keeping requirements for corporations are quite minimal, which makes it easy to disguise ownership of the corporation. In a number of countries, ownership in corporations can be represented by 'bearer shares. In these corporations, the holder of the bearer share certificate is regarded as the owner of the shares. This makes it easy to disguise and transfer ownership. 19 2.4.5 Investing In Legitimate Businesses Launderers sometimes place dirty money in otherwise legitimate businesses to clean it. Legitimate businesses that also serve as conduits for money laundering are referred to as 'front businesses. The principal requirement when using businesses as fronts is that they have high cash sales and/or high turnover. This way it becomes easy for criminals to merge illegal funds and difficult for the authorities to spot the scheme. They may use large businesses like brokerage firms or casinos that deal in so much money it's easy for the dirty stuff to blend in, or they may use small, cash-intensive businesses like bars, car washes etc. These businesses may be "front companies" that actually do provide a good or service but whose real purpose is to clean the launderer's money. This method typically works in one of two ways: The launderer can combine his dirty money with the company's clean revenues -- in this case, the company reports higher revenues from its legitimate business than it's really earning; or the launderer can simply hide his dirty money in the company's legitimate bank accounts in the hopes that authorities won't compare the bank balance to the company's financial statements.
2.4.6 Electronic Transfer Electronic transfer is a common placement technique. Also referred to as a telegraphic transfer or wire transfer, this money laundering method consists of sending funds electronically from one city or country to another to avoid the need to physically transport the currency. Typically, layers are created by moving money through electronic funds transfers into and out of domestic and offshore bank accounts of fictitious individuals and shell companies.
Electronic transfers can be compared to alternative remittances in that both are person-to person transfers that do not require sending funds through the formal banking system. Criminals make use of the electronic financial system because it enables the transfer of large denominations of money instantly to offshore jurisdictions.
20 2.4.7 Asset Conversion Asset conversion is a common placement technique. Asset conversion simply involves the purchase of goods. Illegal money is converted into other assets, such as real estate, diamonds, gold and vehicles, which can then be sold. Generally, money launderers prefer to purchase high-value items that are small and easy to sell or transport to another country. Often these assets will be purchased in the name of a friend to avert suspicion.
2.4.8 Insurance Purchase Illegal money is used to buy insurance policies and instruments, which can be 'cashed in' at a later date. The end result is that the illegal funds have been legitimised by being washed through a legitimate insurance business.
Single premium insurance products can be particularly vulnerable. They involve a single payment 'up-front' and the ability to immediately purchase a fully paid instrument. To a money launderer, these products are attractive because they: involve a one-time payment have a cash surrender value may be transferable
2.4.9 Trusts Trusts are legal arrangements for holding funds or assets for a specified purpose. These funds or assets are managed by a trustee for the benefit of a specified beneficiary or beneficiaries. Trusts can act as layering tools because they enable the creation of false paper trails and transactions. Trusts are principally governed by a deed of trust drawn up by the person who establishes the trust. Trusts are more complex to use than corporations, but they are less regulated.
The private nature of trusts makes them attractive to money launderers. Secrecy and anonymity rules help conceal the identity of the true owner or beneficiary of trust assets. Also, the presence of a corporate trustee provides an appearance of legitimacy. 21 In addition, offshore trusts may contain a 'flee clause. This clause allows the trustee to shift the controlling jurisdiction of the trust if it is in danger because of war, civil unrest or, more likely, the activities of law enforcement officers or litigious investors and consumers. Typically, trusts are used in combination with corporations in money laundering schemes. Trusts are used less frequently than corporations because of their complexity and their disuse in business transactions.
2.4.10 Walking Accounts A walking account is an account for which the account holder has provided standing instructions that all funds be transferred immediately on receipt to one or more other accounts. By setting up a series of walking accounts, criminals can automatically create several layers as soon as any funds transfer occurs.
Money launderers use this layering technique because it is extremely difficult to detect and money moves very fast through accounts across the world. The term 'walking account' was coined because the money in these accounts appears to 'walk away.
2.4.11 Intermediaries Lawyers, accountants and other professionals may be used as intermediaries between the illegal funds and the criminal. Professionals engage in transactions on behalf of a criminal client who remains anonymous. These transactions may include the use of shell corporations, fictitious records and complex paper trails.
Money launderers like to use intermediaries because they lend credibility and decrease suspicion. In addition, these professionals generally have confidentiality obligations to their clients so the risk of money launderers getting caught is low. Many countries have realised that criminals are increasingly using non-financial professionals as intermediaries. To counter these activities, many countries have included non-financial professionals in new anti-money laundering legislation.
22 2.4.12 Import/Export Transactions To bring 'legal' money into the criminal's country of residence, the domestic trading company will export goods to the foreign trading company on an over-invoiced basis. The illegal funds are remitted and reported as export earnings. The transaction can work in the reverse direction as well. In many cases, there is no actual export of goods or only the export of fake goods. In such cases, the trading companies may also exist only on paper. Bankers may be able to spot these transactions if the underlying trade documentation is inadequate or the underlying pricing is incorrect.
2.4.13 Corporate Financing Corporate financing is typically combined with a number of other techniques, including the use of offshore banks, consultants, complex financial arrangements, electronic funds transfers, shell corporations and actual businesses. This allows money launderers to integrate very large amounts of money into the legitimate financial system. Money launderers may also take a tax deduction on interest payments made by them in corporate financing.
From appearances alone, such transactions are identical to legitimate corporate finance transactions. Financial service professionals serving legitimate businesses need to look closely to find peculiarities in their dealings, such as: large loans by unknown entities financing that appears inconsistent with the underlying business unexplained write-offs of debts.
2.4.14 Consultants The use of consultants in money laundering schemes is quite common. The consultant might not even exist. For example, the criminal could actually be the consultant. In this case, the criminal is channelling money back to him/herself. This money is declared as income from services performed and can be used as legitimate funds.
23 In many cases, the criminal will employ an actual consultant (e.g. accountant, lawyer or investment manager) to do some legitimate work. This could involve purchasing assets. Often, the criminal transfers funds to the consultant's client account from where the consultant makes payments on behalf of the criminal.
2.4.15 Credit and Debit Cards Credit and debit cards are efficient ways for money launderers to integrate illegal money into the financial system. By maintaining an account in an offshore jurisdiction through which payments are made, the criminals limit the financial trail that leads to their country of residence.
2.4.16 Bank Secrecy Bank secrecy (or bank privacy) is a legal principle under which banks are allowed to protect personal information about their customers, through the use of numbered bank accounts or otherwise. Effective bank secrecy is better achieved in certain countries, such as Switzerland or in tax havens, where offshore banks adhere to voluntary or statutory levels of privacy.
Created by the Swiss Banking Act of 1934, which led to the famous Swiss bank, the principle of bank secrecy is sometimes considered one of the main aspects of private banking. Advances in financial cryptography (e.g. public-key cryptography) could make it possible to use anonymous electronic money and anonymous digital bearer certificates to achieve financial privacy and anonymous internet banking, given enabling institutions (e.g. issuers of such certificates and digital cash) and computer systems that are secure against attackers. Under the principle of bank secrecy, privacy is statutorily enforced, with Swiss law strictly limiting any information shared with third parties, including tax authorities, foreign governments or even Swiss authorities, except when requested by a Swiss judge's subpoena. However anonymous banking is not strictly true as a term as all Swiss bank accounts, including numbered bank accounts, are linked to an identified individual under Swiss banking law. This law only permits a bank to share information 24 with others in cases of severe criminal acts, such as identifying a terrorist's bank account. Any bank employee violating a client's privacy is punished quite severely by law. Currently in the news United Bank of Switzerland is under severe international pressure to declare the names of those who evaded taxes. The case is currently continuing.
2.4.17 Stock Purchase This point has been discussed at length in chapter 3.
2.5 The Principal Money Laundering methods detected or suspected in INDIA are as follows: Transfers through the hawala system hawala is a money remittance system. Such transfers are quite prevalent in India and Pakistan. These transfers are outside the normal banking channels and are thus anonymous and secretive. Under-invoicing of exports and over invoicing of imports By under invoicing of exports, launderers are able to transfer funds in the form of goods, which when sold shall realize cash. Hence enabling the launderer to transfer funds. By over invoicing imports the launder is able to transfer funds as legal transfer towards purchase of goods. Loan Back Method In this method launderers loan illegal funds to legimitate businesses, which can be used to fund expenses of the business or loan to front companies of the launderer. Further the business is able to gain tax deduction on the interest paid to the launderer on the loan. Smuggling of Currency Indian and Foreign currency notes of high denominations, particularly currency of notes of Rs. 500 denominations are smuggled through couriers to countries like Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong where they are converted into convertible foreign exchange at a discount. Similiarly, foreign exchange acquired locally from unauthorised sources is smuggled out of the country through couriers. 25 Import of Worthless Goods Launderers usually import high value goods such as expensive cars, jewellery etc. which cannot be productively employed. Such high value foreign goods can be easily sold in the domestic market. Export of Paintings, Antiquities and Artifacts Paintings and Antiquities are usually high value items which launderers can easily employ to transfer funds. They may purchase paintings using criminal funds, as a result they are able to convert high large amounts of cash into an item such as painting and then export the paintings, thereby avoiding any suspicion. Funds transferred out of India by adopting one of the above methods are deposited initially in tax havens with the help of financial and tax consultants. Such funds are subsequently transferred to shell corporations. From these shell corporations, funds are invested in India through Overseas Corporate Bodies (OCB) set up for the purpose, in places like Mauritius, Singapore, Hong Kong, Bermuda, Cayman Islands etc.
2.6 Conclusion The form of money laundering has changed with globalization, introduction of newer technology and setting up of offshore financial centres. Launderers can now move funds across the globe in a matter of seconds and that too several times. Money laundering today has become an international activity and a professional activity, it involves a complex web of transfers alongwith change in form. Further newer money laundering techniques have gained importance with globalization of financial centres and improvement in technology. However inspite of the changes in form, the basic characteristic of money laundering has not changed. A typical money laundering transaction still follows a three stage process i.e. Placement, Layering and Integration. Each stage in the money laundering process employs a set of techniques. These techniques differ from country to country and from region to region. The techniques vary depending on the anti-money laundering controls prevalent in the country or region. In India money laundering techniques which are quite prominent are use of Hawala System, smuggling of currency and use of Tax Havens. 26 CHAPTER 3: MONEY LAUNDERING THROUGH CAPITAL MARKETS 3.1 INTRODUCTION The Securities Market is characterised by frequent and numerous transactions, and several mechanisms can be used to make proceeds appear as legitimate earnings from the financial markets. Inaddition, securities transactions are often international. The sector most commonly is used during the layering and integration phases, since most law- abiding brokers do not accept cash transactions. However, this is not an issue for criminals operating within the financial sector itself, such as embezzlers, insider traders, or perpetrators of securities frauds, because their (usually non-cash) funds are already present in the financial system. During the layering phase, a launderer can simply purchase securities with illicit funds transferred from one or more accounts, then use the proceeds from selling these securities as legitimate money. Unlike regular securities, bearer securities (common in some European countries) do not have registered owners, and when they change hands the transaction involves physically handing over the security, thus leaving no paper trail. The securitys owner is simply the person who possesses it. Many but not all countries and jurisdictions have phased out the use of bearer shares because of their potential role in money laundering and tax evasion. FIG 3.1: Money Laundering By Global Industry Sectors Money Laundering by Industry Sector Money Services 4% Credit Cards 5% Banks 55% Insurance Firms 9% Brokerage & Investment Firms 27% Insurance Firms Banks Credit Cards Money Services Brokerage & Investment Firms Source:Celent Finsight Risk and Compliance Summit 2007 27 FIG 3.1 depicts that brokerage and investment sector occupies the second highest position with a share of 27% in terms of susceptibility to money laundering activities. The above pie chart clearly brings out the importance of brokers and stock exchanges being used by money launderers as a vehicle for laundering money. This emphasizes the need for proper regulatory measures and supervision of brokers and exchanges for ensuring a healthy and vibrant capital market.
In its annual typologies reports on recent trends in money laundering, the FATF reports that some countries have seen a significant shift in laundering activities from the traditional banking sector to the non-bank financial sector.
3.2 MONEY LAUNDERING THROUGH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS
3.2.1 Money Laundering Through Secondary Markets Globally Secondary Markets are used during the layering stage of the money laundering process. This creates additional problems as criminal money arriving to be invested in the Stock Exchange is more likely to come from another reputable financial centre than a country with discernible links to organized criminal activity. The increased globalization of financial marketplaces also throws up other difficulties: such as criminals establishing a trading account in the office of a financial institution in one country and then having it transferred to another country. Organised criminal mafia, terrorists, and intelligence agencies seek to covertly use the stock markets for earning funds as well as causing economic instability in a target country. They generally use two methods for this purpose: stock market operations and stock market manipulation. Stock market operations help them to earn money and launder black money, and stock market manipulation helps them to earn and launder money as well as cause economic instability. 28 For a stock market operation, they use individual stock traders or companies -- either floated by them or their surrogates -- for buying and selling shares and making profits -- like any other person interested in the stock market.
Terrorists indulge in stock market manipulation -- that is, artificially pushing stock prices up or down either to earn money or to cause economic instability. Since the terrorists know in advance the dates of their planned terrorist strikes, which often have an impact on the stock market, they can use this advance knowledge to push prices up or down.
In the days before and after the 9/11 terror strikes in the US, there were erratic movements in not only the New York Stock Exchange, but also in the stock exchanges of some European countries. (B Raman, Are terrorists manipulating Indian Stock Markets?, February 16, 2007)
Some of these erratic movements affected the shares of airline companies. This gave rise to widespread speculation and fears that Al Qaeda, which had advance knowledge of the date of its terrorist strikes, had used this knowledge in an attempt to make money and in a futile attempt to cause an economic collapse.
Stock Exchanges can also be utilized as money laundering vehicle through listed companies which are nothing more than a laundering operation themselves. Eg. The now infamous YBM Magnex International Inc was delisted by the Toronto Stock Exchange in December 1998 (Proximal Consulting). A US class action suit claimed that YBMs only successful business is the laundering of criminal proceeds. Red flags have already been raised about the money laundering possibilities inherent in the listing of dotcom companies with no track record and unsustainable market valuations. (B Raman, Are terrorists manipulating Indian Stock Markets?, February 16, 2007)
29 3.2.2 MONEY LAUNDERING THROUGH DERIVATIVES EXCHANGES Derivatives can also be used by initiating simultaneous put and call transactions on behalf of the client. The UK experience showed that the futures market, through Capcom Commodities, a BCCI (Bank for Credit and Commerce International) related institution was another area that money launderers were taking advantage of for their money laundering schemes. Because of the anonymous nature of the trading strategies, all brokers trading as principals and not in their client's name, the true identity of the beneficial owner is not known. Derivatives therefore are a zero sum game, which means you can only buy if someone is willing to sell, and vice versa. Launderers can take advantage by a strategy of buying and selling the same commodity, thereby taking a small hit for the commission charged by the broker. They pay the losing contract out of dirty money and receive a cheque that legitimises their profits and creates a paper trail for any one who asks where the money came from.
3.3 MONEY LAUNDERING THROUGH STOCK EXCHANGES IN INDIA Laundering black money through the secondary market is a common practice in India. Unaccounted wealth that got laundered though the secondary market could well run into several thousand crores of rupees. Tax officials have estimated about Rs 300 400 crore could have been laundered via the stock market in Mumbai alone.
3.3.1 CASE 1: USE OF PENNY STOCKS Given that hundreds of penny stocks have been brazenly manipulated, large-scale ramping up of penny stocks provided a convenient cover for launderers. A number of companys shares have been manipulated through this route. The modus operandi is as follows:
A group prepares the ground by ramping up shares of scores of companies that were traded at just a few rupees each or sometimes less than a rupee. For instance, if X wants to launder Rs 1,000, the racketeers would give him 10 physical shares of a company quoting on the bourses at around Rs 100. This would be accompanied by a back-dated 30 contract note, showing the sale at around Rs one per share for a cash consideration. Since shares cannot be sold in physical form, the buyer sends the shares to the depository to be dematerialised and converted into electronic form. He sells the dematerialised shares on the secondary market at the artificially ramped up price of Rs 100 plus and pockets a cheque payment, converting his black money into white.
Depending on how far the receipt was back-dated, he walks away by paying either zero or 10 % capital gains tax. It may be recalled that capital gains dropped to 10% since April 2000 and the fraud has been in operation ever since. In one case the price was ramped up from a few paise to Rs 4.80 and in another case a one rupee face value stock was ramped up to Rs 85. (Sucheta Dalal, Depositories used for money laundering, 22 nd March 2006, Financial Express)
For instance, the shares of one company, with a paid up capital of Rs 7.3 crore showed Rs 20 crore worth of rematerialisation/dematerialisation in the last two years (this is conversion from physical share certificates to electronic entries and vice versa). Considering that floating stock of a company on an average is just around 50% to 60 % of the capital, the entire capital has been put through the demat-remat process several times in a single year, without attracting the attention of the depositories.
In a compulsory demat environment, large scale rematerialisation of fairly liquid shares ought to have triggered a loud alarm. While thousands of persons dematerialised shares and laundered their illegal income, the applicants for rematerialisation in each case were only a handful of individuals. In most cases, there is no record of the back-dated bills in the books of the brokers.
3.3.2 CASE 2: USE OF LISTED COMPANIES The case comprises many companies some of them were trading companies and related individuals that were alleged for asking for funds with the assurance of high returns on investments. 31 Presume there is an existing BSE-listed company, which is closed and is not trading at all. Today, there are over 8,000 companies listed on the BSE, of which more than 50% companies are in the B2 and Z category and are hardly traded. It can happen that two or three people form an alliance and take over such a company changing its name to an infotech company. It is even probable that the existing promoters of the company simply change the name of their company to a software company. In actual practice, these companies do not have the necessary infrastructure or the requisite workforce essential to run a software company. The next step is to form a subsidiary overseas by renting a place or just even employing a person to carry out the operations. Most of the exports are made to duty free ports such as Hong Kong, Singapore or Dubai where the money can be remitted back.
After that, the promoters conduct Hawala/ alternate remittance transactions by paying cash over here and getting dollars from abroad through the subsidiary. The same dollars transferred from abroad are shown as software exports in the company's books. In this way the company is able to report decent sales figures in its balance sheet by the way of export income. The next step is to grab a flashy share broker or market operator whose gossips about the company can be floated in the market. The share broker or the operator then spreads stories such as the company has got big software development orders or tie- ups and is going to post superb profit numbers. Obviously, the fake export income compels the net profit stating strong Earnings per Share for the company.
Since, the P/E of the company appears to be quite low in comparison with the industry P/E; the stock appears to be an excellent buy. The market operators start providing liquidity in the counter by creating demand for the stock by them. As a result the volumes in the counter start increasing. The stock price of the company starts touching upper circuits in sequence. The promoters start taking advantage of this situation by reducing their own stake and offering it to the small investors who will be willing to buy. In the end we have the small investors who are left holding the stock which they have purchased at the high prices. Thus the promoters are able to take advantage in two ways. 32 Firstly they are able to get a superior price for the dead stocks of their company, which were not being traded at all and secondly are able to exchange their cash into official export income at a low premium without paying any income tax.
3.3.3 CASE 3: USE OF PARTICIPATORY NOTES Offshore derivatives instruments (ODIs) are investment vehicles used by overseas investors for an exposure in Indian equities or equity derivatives. A participatory note is the most popular offshore derivative instrument. FIIs issue these instruments to overseas investors against ownership of underlying shares in an Indian company. Foreign investors need to register as FIIs or as a sub-account of a registered FII to invest in equities listed in India. To circumvent this process, they also have the flexibility to route their money through FIIs or sub-accounts of FIIs. The document used to route money in this manner is the Participatory Note. The identity of foreign investors gets masked when they earmark funds for investment in India through PNs. A participatory note is a form of equitylinked note: basically, a derivative instrument, typically issued by a broker registered with Sebi, against an underlying Indian security. The broker issuing the P-Note purchases the underlying security and then passes through the dividends and capital gains and losses generated by the security to the noteholder, effectively giving the holder indirect exposure to the investment returns associated with the Indian security. Here, brokers become the medium through which investors, most of whom wish to remain anonymous, invest in the exchange. The brokers execute trade and use their internal accounts to settle. Ever since the India growth story caught on, P-notes have become quite the rage with overseas investors.
FII Sub-Accounts Sub-accounts are special purpose vehicles floated by foreign funds in which they manage money on behalf of their overseas clients. FIIs also form proprietary sub-accounts to invest their own money.
33 FIG 3.2: Shows the increasing Number of FIIs and Sub-Accounts from 2005 to 2007 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 N o .
i n
t h o u s a n d s Years Increasing Number of FIIs and Sub-Accounts End year number of FIIs 823 1044 1219 End year number of Sub-Accounts 2273 3045 3644 2005 2006 2007
Source: Economic Survey 2007-2008
FIG 3.2 shows that the number of Sub-Accounts has exceeded the number of FIIs. The number of times the sub-accounts have exceeded the number of FIIs registered with SEBI is almost three-fold. For the year 2004-2005, the Sub-Accounts exceeded FIIs by 2.76 times. For the year 2005-2006, the Sub-Accounts exceeded registered FIIs by 2.92 times. And for the year 2006-2007, the Sub-Accounts exceeded registered FIIs by 2.99 times. These facts clearly show the popularity of sub-accounts as tools for investments into India.
P-Notes became very popular with foreign investors seeking exposure to Indian equities markets due to the registration requirement India imposes for direct investment. These investors approach a foreign institutional investor (FII), who is already registered with SEBI. The FII makes purchases on behalf of those investors and the FIIs affiliate issues to them ODIs. The underlying asset for the ODI could be either stocks or equity 34 derivatives like Nifty futures. These investors are not registered with SEBI, either because they do not want to, or due to regulatory restrictions.
FIG 3.3: Depicts The Cumulative Net Investments Made By Fiis For The Period Ranging From 1992 To 2008 In Comparison With The Sensex Growth of Sensex in comparison with Cumulative Net Investment by FIIs 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 1992- 1993 1993- 1994 1994- 1995 1995- 1996 1996- 1997 1997- 1998 1998- 1999 1999- 2000 2000- 2001 2001- 2002 2002- 2003 2003- 2004 2004- 2005 2005- 2006 2006- 2007 2007- 2008 Year C u m u l a t i v e
n e t
i n v s t
( U S
$
m n ) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 S e n s e x
V a l u e Cumulative net investment (US $ mn.) Sensex Source: Compiled from Sebi and BSE sources
FIIs are very important source of investment in Indian Capital markets. If we look at FIG 3.3 we can see that the reason behind the market booms is the investments made by FIIs. They are the major contributors to the stock markets. They are very active while trading in the Indian Securities market. The past boom in the stock markets in 2001-02, 2003-04, and 2005-06 have been attributed to the FIIs. But still FIIs are looked with a word of caution and a sense of worry for market regulators. Whenever, investment climate in the country is not good, they will indulge in capital flights and overnight withdraw their money from the markets thus making the conditions in the market worst. They have a very strong influence in Indian markets and Governments and regulators cannot take the risk of taking them lightly. Their strong 35 presence in the Indian markets has cautioned the government to address the issue of participatory notes very carefully because otherwise they may adversely affect the FIIs inflow into India. FIIs that dont wish to register with SEBI or fails to get registration or are ineligible to get registration, make entries in the Indian capital markets through the participatory notes. FIIs also earn huge commission while facilitating investment of participatory notes holders like unregistered FIIs, hedge fund, university endowments, etc in the Indian Capital markets. The influence of Participatory Notes in Indian Capital markets can be gauged from the simple fact that, according to one estimate, 51% of FII investment till August, 2007 were via Participatory Notes and that is equal to 3, 53,484 crores.
Issues Concerning Participatory Notes The principal concern is the masking of identity of the foreign investor. Hedge funds tend to use this route. There is also the possibility of resident Indians channeling unaccounted money through this route. The crux of the problem lies in identifying the "real" and "final" beneficiaries of transactions using PNs. Company A could be controlled by Company B which, in turn, could be controlled by Company C in a country over which the Indian government has no jurisdiction. Technically, Sebi officials can try and establish an "audit trail" up to three layers of beneficiaries although even this is rather difficult. Thus, the Indian regulator is unable to ascertain the actual source of funds or the colour of the money coming in through PNs.
It is apprehended that part of the money that is coming into the country actually belongs to persons of Indian origin who had kept their money abroad at a time when the government used to have restrictions on the use of hard currency. Such "round-tripping" funds are now returning to India through tax havens like Mauritius. With the rupee having appreciated against the US dollar, it is believed 36 that higher flows of such funds are coming to India to finance election campaigns of politicians.
There are fears that P-Notes are being used as a vehicle by promoters, market operators, and politicians to repatriate illegitimate funds parked abroad. Quite a few promoters are said to be using this route to ramp up their stocks.
The fact that Sebi can lift the "corporate veil" only up to a point to identify the true beneficiaries of transactions using PNs. As per SEBI rules, the FII issuing ODIs/P-Notes should know the eventual beneficiary to whom the instruments are being issued to. But through multiple layering, it is possible to conceal the identity of the original client. Then there are concerns that too much money flowing into the derivatives segment through the P-Note route is adding to volatility, not to mention the pressure on the currency.
The possibility of criminal money getting deployed is also a risk. There is the fear (justified to a large extent based on experience in other markets) that such flows can be `hot money that could move out in a jiffy, leaving behind negative consequences for the broad economy.
37 TABLE 3.1: Recent Initiatives By Sebi To Curb Participatory Notes DATE ACTION TAKEN BRIEF PARTICULARS October 2007 Sebi imposed a slew of curbs on the use of PNs for share transactions** FIIs had pumped in $18 billion into the countrys stock markets during 2007, these same institutions had withdrawn around $13 billion between January and October 2008 October 2008 Sebi reversed its decision to restrict the use of PNs ostensibly on the ground that FIIs needed encouragement to continue to invest in India. May 27, 2008 Disclosure norms on offshore derivatives instruments (ODI), market regulator Sebi asked FIIs to give an undertaking that these investment tools are not issued to non-resident and resident Indians, who otherwise do not need the FII route. Sebi wants to track how much money is coming from FIIs and from Indian investors separately. October 31, 2008 Sebi released historical data on short- sales by FIIs that indicated that on October 9 there had been short-selling in 224 specific stocks worth around Rs 6,500 crore Among the entities whose shares were "short-sold" (Lending shares that did not belong to them and buying them back by obtaining loans from third parties.) are HDFC, ICICI Bank, Axis Bank, Reliance Industries Ltd, Bharti Airtel, Infosys, Reliance Capital and Reliance Communications in other words, the blue chips of the countrys corporate world. October 23, 2008 Sebi disapproves of lending to offshore entities and asked them to reverse such transactions
POST OCTOBER 2008 The lending/borrowing activity of FIIs is being monitored and, if necessary, stronger measures will be taken by Sebi as considered appropriate". But nothing has happened.
Reasons For Reluctance On Part Of Ministry of Finance In Curbing Participatory Notes
The finance ministry justifies the use of PNs on the ground that it enables higher inflows through FIIs, adds to liquidity and trading volumes, leads to better price discovery and lower transaction costs and overheads Source: Compiled from newspaper article Asian Age dated Friday 8 th May 2009
38 ** P-Notes with stocks as underlying assets can be issued by an FII, subject to a limit of 40% of the overall assets under the custody of that FII. Simply put, if an FII has $100 million worth of assets under custody (AUC), only $40 million of those assets can be in the form of equity-based P-Notes. Where P-Notes with equity derivatives are the underlying assets, SEBI has proposed that these cannot be issued anymore, and the existing positions have to be unwound over a period of 18 months.
3.3.4 CASE 4: USE OF DEPOSITORIES FOR MONEY LAUNDERING Market intermediaries are using the stock market to convert black money into white by using benami entities as fronts. The operation requires a slew of demat accounts and a network of investors ready to lend their demat accounts. Typically a person who wants to convert some of his idle money approaches these brokers who offer the facility for a price. The broker makes the necessary arrangements for the client to participate in the IPO by using a network of benami demat accounts. Profit from the IPO proceeds can be taken away as white income by paying 10% short term capital gains (STCG) tax.
Now, market manipulators are taking advantage of the buoyant primary market. In calendar 2005 till date, around Rs 22,000 crore has been mobilized from the market through 45 issues, a mix of initial public offerings (IPOs) and follow on public offerings (FPOs).
This is how it works: An investor with a high risk appetite and idle money say Rs 2 crore, approaches the broker who provides such services. The broker charges a 5% flat fee (Rs 10 lakh) for the end-to-end solution he provides.
He applies in the IPO on behalf of the investor through his network of benami accounts, keeping in mind factors like levels of likely oversubscription in particular categories and the possible basis of allotment.
39 Most of the time, the allotment is in line with the expectation and within days of listing, the entire lot of allotted shares is disposed of. Since the secondary market was buoyant in the recent past, the listing of most IPOs in the recent past has happened at a huge premium to the issue price. Taking advantage of this buoyancy, the allotted shares in the IPOs are disposed of within a very short period after listing, thus attracting short term capital gains (STCG) tax of 10%. Even after paying the STCG, the investor walks away with a hefty profit and an added bonus of converting the idle funds into white income. (Financial Express, 19/12/2005, Demat scam being used to convert black money)
How the System Works: Broker-operators keep their network of benami demat accounts ready and offer the facility to those wishing to invest idle funds in the IPO market Charge flat fee on amount invested, and then put the network to use by applying in the new issues Once the allotments come, they quickly disinvest after listing and the investor pays short-term capital gains tax (STCG) at 10% and walks away after turning black into white
The practice of using multiple demat accounts to corner shares in an IPO is well known and prevalent one. In the cases of Yes Bank IPO and IDFC IPO, benamis and front entities were used to act as conduits for laundering of ill-gotten funds.
The modus operandi used was to submit many applications for shares in the retail category of an IPO using fictitious names and multiple demat and bank accounts. An investor approaches a broker if he knows anyone who has a demat account is not applying for the particular IPO. The broker helps the investor find such a person after which the rent is fixed. Once the allotments are made to these various accounts, the investor and his associates consolidate the holding through off-market transactions before the shares list.
40 This is possible as the transfer of shares from one demat account to another is allowed without having to route this through the exchanges. That means even if the investor's shareholding crosses 1%, the exchanges have no clue. Once listed the shares are then traded by the investor and his associates who control the consolidated accounts. The case of Yes Bank and IDFC indicates to the systemic lapses by depository participants, merchant bankers, banks, and registrars.
3.4 Conclusion In the Global context, Brokerage and Investment Firms rank second in terms of susceptibility to money laundering worldwide. Stock Markets are usually employed by launderers during the layering phase of the money laundering process. Launderers use not only equity markets but also derivatives market to launder funds. India in the recent past has generated a lot of interest globally as a fast growing economy and hence funds have been flowing into India ever since. However even launderers have taken a keen interest in the Indian growth story as a means to launder funds. In India the key methods used to launder funds through capital markets have been by using Penny Stocks, Listed Companies, Participatory Notes and Depositories. In the case of Participatory Notes the Indian government has shown reluctance in curbing such flows since the volume of flows coming through this channel is huge and such flows are essential for a developing country like India. 41 CHAPTER 4: IMPACT OF MONEY LAUNDERING 4.1 INTRODUCTION Money Laundering is associated with large flows of money. Such large flows are beneficial for an emerging economy like India in the short term but is detrimental in the long term. This chapter tries to comprehend the impact that money laundering can have on the various constituent parts of the economy.
4.2 PROBLEM FOR EMERGING MARKETS 1. Increased vigilance by authorities in the major financial centres to combat money laundering activity provides an incentive for launderers to shift their activities to emerging markets. 2. As ill-prepared emerging economies open up their financial markets, they become increasingly attractive targets for money laundering activity. 3. Countries with loose detecting / recording systems attract inflow of criminal funds. This is evidenced by rising funds movement to such centres 4. Developing states cant be too selective about the sources of capital they attract. 5. Postponing action on vigilance steps may allow organized crime to become entrenched.
4.3 IMPACT OF MONEY LAUNDERING
4.3.1 IMPACT ON THE FINANCIAL SECTOR First, money laundering erodes financial institutions themselves. Money laundering impairs the development of important financial institutions and intermediaries. Second, particularly in developing countries money laundering impairs customer trust. A reputation for integrity is the one of the most valuable assets of a financial institution.
42 Table 4.1: Specific Risks Faced by Financial Institutions and Intermediaries TYPE OF RISK SYNOPSIS OF RISK Reputational Risk The potential that adverse publicity regarding a intermediaries business practices, whether accurate or not, will cause a loss of confidence in the integrity of the institution Operational Risk
The risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events Weaknesses in implementation of AML programmes, ineffective control procedures and failure to practise due diligence Legal Risk
The possibility that lawsuits, adverse judgements or contracts that turn out to be unenforceable can disrupt or adversely affect the operations or condition of an intermediary Intermediary may become subject to lawsuits resulting from the failure to observe mandatory KYC standards or from the failure to practise due diligence Intermediaries can suffer fines, criminal liabilities and special penalties imposed by supervisors
4.3.2 IMPACT ON THE REAL SECTOR Money laundering has a more direct negative effect on economic growth in the real sector by diverting resources to less-productive activity, which in turn depress economic growth. Money laundering also facilitates crime and corruption within developing economies, which is antithetical to sustainable economic growth.
As can be seen from the various money-laundering typologies reports, money laundered through channels other than financial institutions is often placed in what are known as "sterile" investments, or investments that generate little additional productivity for the broader economy, such as real estate, art, antiques, jewellery, and luxury automobiles. For developing countries, the diversion of such scarce resources to less productive 43 domestic assets or luxury imports is a serious detriment to economic growth. Moreover, criminal organizations can transform productive enterprises into sterile investments by operating them for the purposes of laundering illicit proceeds rather than as profit- maximizing enterprises responsive to consumer demand and worthy of legitimate investment capital.
4.3.3 IMPACT ON EXTERNAL SECTOR Money laundering can impair a developing country's economy through the country's trade and international capital flows. Moreover, the confidence that foreign investors and foreign financial institutions have in a developing country's financial institutions is important for developing economies because of the role such confidence plays in investment decisions and capital flows. Money laundering can also be associated with significant distortions to a country's imports and exports alongwith increased volatility of exchange rates.
4.3.4 IMPACT ON BUSINESS The institution could become part of the criminal network itself. Evidence of such complicity will have a damaging effect on the attitudes of other financial intermediaries and of regulatory authorities, as well as ordinary customers. There is a damping effect on foreign direct investment when a countrys commercial and financial sectors are perceived to be subject to the control and influence of organised crime. Unpredictable changes in money demand.
4.3.5 IMPACT ON SOCIETY Organised crime can infiltrate financial institutions, acquire control of large sectors of the economy through investment, or offer bribes to public officials and governments. 44 The economic and political influence of criminal organisations can weaken the social fabric, collective ethical standards, and ultimately the democratic institutions of society. Most fundamentally, money laundering is inextricably linked to the underlying criminal activity that generated it. Laundering enables criminal activity to continue. Ultimately influencing the democratic process.
4.4 Conclusion Developed countries having stringent Anti-Money Laundering controls offer very little opportunities to launderers. Hence money laundering activities are seeking countries with poor Anti-Money Laundering controls. In line with such a trend money laundering has been shifting focus to developing countries with poor or no Anti-Money Laundering controls. India being a developing country is an attractive destination for launderers. The impact of money laundering can be very severe on an economy like India. Not only does money laundering impact the financial institutions but also other key areas of the economy. Further money laundering also brings about various negative changes in the social and economic arena of the economy which hinder development and destroy the fabric of the economy. 45 CHAPTER 5: INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC INITIATIVES AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING
5.1. INTRODUCTION The world community has been taking money laundering very seriously. Since money laundering has attained a global reach, every country must not only look to safeguard their economy but also have systems which facilitate cooperation amongst countries. In line with this view many legislations and initiatives have been taken by countries and also international communities. The objective of this chapter is to examine important outcomes of enactments and initiatives taken by the world community. Inaddition it is also sought to examine the money laundering efforts being taken in the Indian context.
5.2 ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING LEGISLATIONS AND INITIATIVES
5.2.1 THE BANK SECRECY ACT (USA, 1970) was designed to fight drug trafficking, money laundering, and other crimes. Congress enacted the BSA to help prevent banks and other financial service providers from being used as intermediaries for, or being used to hide the transfer or deposit of money derived from, criminal activity. Among other items, the BSA created an investigative paper trail by establishing regulatory reporting standards and requirements (e.g., the Currency Transaction Report), and, through a later amendment, established recordkeeping requirements for wire transfers. Key features of the Act were: Established requirements for recordkeeping and reporting by private individuals, banks and other financial institutions Designed to help identify the source, volume, and movement of currency and other monetary instruments transported or transmitted into or out of the United States or deposited in financial institutions Required banks to (1) report cash transactions over $10,000 using the Currency Transaction Report; (2) properly identify persons conducting transactions; and (3) maintain a paper trail by keeping appropriate records of financial transactions 46 The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN) acts as the designated administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). A summary of various legislations and initiatives taken domestically as well as internationally is provided in the table below: TABLE 5.1: Timeline of Domestic as well as International Initiatives for Prevention of Money Laundering International Initiatives Indian Initiatives 1970 Bank Secrecy Act (USA) 1985 Narcotics drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1986 The Money Laundering Control Act (USA) 1988 Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act 1988
Basle Committee Statement of Principles 1988 Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropics Substances Act 1988 The Anti-Drug Abuse Act (USA) 1999 Foreign Exchange Management Act 1988 Vienna Convention (UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) 2002 Prevention of Money Laundering Act,
1989 Financial Action Taskforce (FATF) 2004 Unlawful Activities Act (UAPA) as amended 1991 European Union Directive Guidelines for anti-money laundering measures by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) 1992 The Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act (USA)
1992 IOSCO 1994 The Money Laundering Suppression Act (USA)
1995 EGMONT Group 1997 Asia/Pacific Group on money laundering
1998 The Money Laundering And Financial Crimes Strategy Act (USA)
2000 The Palermo Convention (The International Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime)
2000 The Financial Services And Markets Act
2001 USA Patriot Act 2001 EU Second Money Laundering Directive
Source: Compiled from various articles and magazines 47 5.2.2 THE MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL ACT OF 1986 (USA) amended the BSA to enhance its effectiveness and to strengthen the governments ability to fight money laundering by making it a federal crime and by making structuring transactions to avoid BSA reporting requirements a criminal offense. Key features of the Act were: 1. Established money laundering as a federal crime 2. Prohibited structuring transactions to evade CTR filings 3. Introduced civil and criminal forfeiture for BSA violations 4. Directed banks to establish and maintain procedures to ensure and monitor compliance with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the BSA
5.2.3 THE BASLE COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES The increased international concern about organized crime and the concentration of power and finance around drug and other criminals was shared by the banking community. The Basle Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices (the Basle Committee) stated in December of 1988.
The statements basic purpose is to ensure that banks are not used to hide or launder the profits of crime. Its basic principles are in summary: Know Your Customer: Banks should make reasonable efforts to determine the customers true identity, and have effective procedures for verifying the bona fides of new customers.
Compliance With Laws: Bank management should ensure that business is conducted in conformity with high ethical standards, that laws and regulations are adhered to and that a service is not provided where there is good reason to suppose that transactions are associated with laundering activities.
Co-Operation With Law Enforcement Agencies: Without any constraints imposed by rules relating to customer confidentiality, banks should cooperate fully with national law enforcement agencies including, where there are 48 reasonable grounds for suspecting money laundering, taking appropriate measures which are consistent with the law.
Policies, Procedures And Training: All banks should formally adopt policies consistent with the principles set out in the Statement and should ensure that all members of their staff concerned, wherever located, are informed of the banks policy. To promote adherence to these principles banks should implement specific procedures for customer identification and retaining internal records of transactions. Arrangements for internal audit may need to be extended in order to establish an effective means of testing for general compliance with the Statement.
5.2.4 THE ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT OF 1988 reinforced and supplemented anti- money laundering efforts by increasing the levels of penalties and sanctions for money laundering crimes and by requiring strict identification and documentation of cash purchases of certain monetary instruments. Key features of the Act were:
Expanded the definition of financial institution to include businesses such as car dealers and real estate personnel and required them to file reports on large currency transactions Required the verification of identity of purchasers of monetary instruments over $3,000
5.2.5 THE VIENNA CONVENTION The Vienna Convention, adopted in December 1988, lays the groundwork for efforts to combat money laundering by creating an obligation for signatory states to criminalize the laundering of money from drug trafficking. It promotes international cooperation in investigations and makes extradition between signatory states applicable to money laundering. And it establishes the principle that domestic bank secrecy provisions should not interfere with international criminal investigations. 49 5.2.6 EUROPEAN UNION DIRECTIVE In June 1991, the Council of the European Communities adopted a directive on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering. This directive was issued in response to the new opportunities for money laundering opened up by the liberalization of capital movements and crossborder financial services in the European Union. The directive obligates member states to outlaw money laundering. They must require financial institutions to establish and maintain internal systems to prevent laundering, to obtain the identification of customers with whom they enter into transactions of more than ECU 15,000, and to keep proper records for at least five years. Member states must also require financial institutions to report suspicious transactions and must ensure that such reporting does not result in liability for the institution or its employees.
5.2.7 RESOLUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) adopted, in October 1992, a report and resolution encouraging its members to take necessary steps to combat money laundering in securities and futures markets. A working group of IOSCOs Consultative Committee has been set up to collect information from IOSCO members self-regulatory organizations and exchanges on their efforts to encourage their own members to fight money laundering.
5.2.8 THE ANNUNZIO-WYLIE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT OF 1992 (USA) increased penalties for depository institutions found guilty of money laundering. The act added several significant provisions to the BSA, including the reporting of suspicious transactions. The act also made the operation of an illegal money transmitting business a crime, and required that banking regulatory agencies formally consider revoking the charter of any depository institution convicted of money laundering. Key features of the Act were: 1. Strengthened the sanctions for BSA violations. 50 2. Required Suspicious Activity Reports and eliminated previously used Criminal Referral Forms. 3. Required verification and recordkeeping for wire transfers. 4. Established the Bank Secrecy Act Advisory Group (BSAAG).
5.2.9 THE MONEY LAUNDERING SUPPRESSION ACT OF 1994 (USA) required regulators to develop enhanced examination procedures and to increase examiner training to improve the identification of money laundering schemes in financial institutions.
5.2.10 THE ASIA/PACIFIC GROUP ON MONEY LAUNDERING The Asia Pacific Group was established in February 1997 as a voluntary cooperative organisation committed to combating money laundering in the asia/pacific region. Its primary objective is to facilitate the adoption of universal standards, as set out by the FATF, and how the 40 recommendations can be implemented effectively. An APG Steering Group and a Typologies Working group were also established.
5.2.11 The EGMONT GROUP The Egmont group is a confederacy /informal exchange of many national Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) established to address financial crimes. One of the recommendations of the FATF is that each country should address financial crime. One of the recommendations of the FATF is that each country should establish an FIU that will serve as a database for collation and analysis of STRs. The aim of Egmont Group therefore is to provide support by expanding and systematising the exchange of financial intelligence. It is also aimed at improving the capacity of law enforcement agencies, and fostering better communication between and amongst them in the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing and other financial crimes.
51 5.2.12 THE MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCIAL CRIMES STRATEGY ACT OF 1998 (USA) required the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and other relevant agencies, including state and local agencies, to coordinate and implement a national strategy to address money laundering. Key features of the Act were: Required banking agencies to develop anti-money laundering training for examiners Required the Department of the Treasury and other agencies to develop a National Money Laundering Strategy
5.2.13 THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT OF 2000 (UK) Treasurys enactment of this AML law served as an operational framework the Britains Financial Services Authority (FSA), which started operating in 2001. Significantly, it served to facilitate the move from a voluntary compliance culture to a statutory one.
5.2.14 The USA PATRIOT Act, 2001 (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) evolved as a response by the U.S. government to combat international terrorism. The act contained strong measures to prevent, detect, and prosecute terrorism and international money laundering. Signed into law on October 26, 2001, the act establishes new rules and responsibilities affecting U.S. banking organizations, other financial institutions, and non-financial commercial businesses. The Key features of the Act were: Provides the Secretary of the Treasury with the authority to impose special measures on jurisdictions, institutions, or transactions that are of primary money- laundering concern. Requires financial institutions to increase their due diligence standards when dealing with foreign private banking and correspondent accounts. Prohibits correspondent accounts with foreign shell banks. Expands the ability of the public and private sectors to share information related to terrorism and money laundering investigations. 52 Facilitates records access and requires banks to respond to regulatory requests for information within 120 hours. Establishes minimum standards for customer identification at account opening and requires checks against government-provided lists of known or suspected terrorists. Requires regulatory agencies to evaluate an institutions anti-money laundering record when considering bank mergers, acquisitions, and other applications for business combinations. Extends an anti-money laundering program requirement to all financial institutions. Increases the civil and criminal penalties for money laundering.
5.2.15 PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT OF (POCA), 2002 (UK) UK Proceeds of Crime Act (2002) makes the disclosure of income sources mandatory, and also gives law enforcement agencies such as the Organized Crime Force the legal muscle to seize undisclosed assets funded by illicitly generated profits.
The Act also makes explicit provisions for the handling of seized goods and assets to prevent further foul play once financial criminals have been apprended. This piece of AML legislation broadened the range of entities being regulated, and constituted as substantial expansion of the breadth of principal and non-disclosure offences.
5.2.16 FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT, 1999 (INDIA) It permits only authorised person to deal in foreign exchange or foreign security. Such an authorised person, under the Act, means authorised dealer, money changer, off-shore banking unit or any other person for the time being authorised by Reserve Bank.
5.2.17 BENAMI TRANSACTIONS (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1988 (INDIA) When a person owns a property through another person who is only a name lender to him, he has a benami ownership. This is forbidden under the law. A special enactment, 53 The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 has been passed and the highlights of the same are as follows: The Act does not apply to property held in the benami names of wife or unmarried daughter, or held under a Trust by a trustee for the benefit of another as a beneficiary. The real owner loses all his rights and remedies to recover his property from his benamidar. The Government is vested with the power to acquire the property from the benamidar without paying compensation. After the passing of the Act, to own a property in the name of a benamidar will constitute an offence. It is to be noted that upto the passing of the above enactment, benami transactions were covered by Section 82 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
5.2.18 PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002 (INDIA) The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) enacted to prevent money laundering and provide for confiscation of property derived from, or involved in, money laundering Administered by: Financial Intelligence Unit for verification of identity of clients, maintenance of records and reporting Enforcement Directorate for investigation of and prosecution for money-laundering offences
The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 came into effect on 1 July 2005.
Section 3 of the Act makes the offense of money-laundering cover those persons or entities who directly or indirectly attempt to indulge or knowingly assist or 54 knowingly are party or are actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property, such person or entity shall be guilty of offense of money-laundering.
Section 4 of the Act prescribes punishment for money-laundering with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to five lakh rupees. However, where the proceeds of crime involved in money laundering relates to any offence specified under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the punishment may extend to rigorous imprisonment for ten years.
Section 12 (1) prescribes the obligations on banks, financial institutions and intermediaries (a) to maintain records detailing the nature and value of transactions which may be prescribed, whether such transactions comprise of a single transaction or a series of transactions integrally connected to each other, and where such series of transactions take place within a month; (b) to furnish information of transactions referred to in clause (a) to the Director within such time as may be prescribed and to (c) verify and maintain the records of the identity of all its clients.
As per Section 12 (2), the records referred to in sub-section (1) as mentioned above, must be maintained for ten years after the transactions finished.
Intermediary under PMLA includes persons registered under Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992: Stock brokers Registrars to issue Sub-brokers Merchant bankers Share transfer agents Underwriters Bankers to an issue Portfolio Managers Trustees to trust deed Custodian of securities Depositories Foreign institutional investors Credit rating agencies Venture capital funds Collective investment schemes including mutual funds
55 5.2.19 FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE (FATF) The FATF is an inter-governmental body which sets standards, and develops and promotes policies to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Founded in 1989 by G7 Group in response to mounting concerns over Money Laundering. It currently has 33 members: 31 countries and governments and two international organisations; and more than 20 observers. It focuses on: Spreading the anti-money laundering message to all continents and regions of the globe. Monitoring the implementation of its Forty Recommendations. Reviewing and publishing money laundering trends and countermeasures (typologies exercise).
The original FATF Forty Recommendations were drawn up in 1990 as an initiative to combat the misuse of financial systems by persons laundering drug money. In 1996 the Recommendations were revised for the first time to reflect evolving money laundering typologies. The 1996 Forty Recommendations have been endorsed by more than 130 countries and are the international anti-money laundering standard. In October 2001 the FATF expanded its mandate to deal with the issue of the financing of terrorism, and took the important step of creating the Eight Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing.
The FATF reviewed and revised the Forty Recommendations into a new comprehensive framework for combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The FATF now calls upon all countries to take the necessary steps to bring their national systems for combating money laundering and terrorist financing into compliance with the new FATF Recommendations, and to effectively implement these measures.
The revised Forty Recommendations now apply not only to money laundering but also to terrorist financing, and when combined with the Eight Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing provide an enhanced, comprehensive and consistent framework of 56 measures for combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The Recommendations therefore set minimum standards for action for countries to implement the detail according to their particular circumstances and constitutional frameworks.
A key element in the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism is the need for countries systems to be monitored and evaluated, with respect to these international standards. The key FATF recommendations applicable to financial intermediaries are as summarised in Table 5.2:
57 TABLE 5.2: Key FATF Recommendations Applicable to Financial Institutions & Intermediaries FATF Recommendations Brief Particulars Implemented in India Recommendation 5 Financial institutions should not keep anonymous accounts or accounts in obviously fictitious names. Financial institutions should undertake customer due diligence measures, including identifying and verifying the identity of their customers, when: establishing business relations; carrying out occasional transactions: (i) above the applicable designated threshold; or (ii) that are wire transfers there is a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing; or The financial institution has doubts about the veracity or adequacy of previously obtained customer identification data.
Recommendation 6 Financial institutions should, in relation to politically exposed persons, in addition to performing normal due diligence measures: a) Have appropriate risk management systems to determine whether the customer is a politically exposed person. b) Obtain senior management approval for establishing business relationships with such customers. c) Take reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds. d) Conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship.
Recommendation 8 Financial institutions should pay special attention to any money laundering threats that may arise from new or developing technologies that might favour anonymity. In particular, financial institutions should have policies and procedures in place to address any specific risks associated with non-face to face business relationships or transactions.
Recommendation 10 Financial institutions should maintain, for at least five years, all necessary records on transactions, both domestic and international, to enable them to comply swiftly with information requests from the competent authorities.
Recommendation 11 Financial institutions should pay special attention to all complex, unusual large transactions, and all unusual patterns of transactions, which have no apparent economic or visible lawful purpose.
Recommendation 13 If a financial institution suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of a criminal activity, or are related to terrorist financing, it should be required, directly by law or regulation, to report promptly its suspicions to the financial intelligence unit (FIU).
Recommendation 15 Financial institutions should develop programmes against money laundering and terrorist financing. These programmes should include: a) The development of internal policies, procedures and controls, including appropriate compliance management arrangements, and adequate screening procedures to ensure high standards when hiring employees. b) An ongoing employee training programme.
Recommendation 21 Financial institutions should give special attention to business relationships and transactions with persons, including companies and financial institutions, from countries which do not or insufficiently apply the FATF Recommendations.
Recommendation 26 Countries should establish a FIU that serves as a national centre for the receiving (and, as permitted, requesting), analysis and dissemination of STR and other information regarding potential money laundering or terrorist financing. The FIU should have access, directly or indirectly, on a timely basis to the financial, administrative and law enforcement information that it requires to properly undertake its functions, including the analysis of STR.
Recommendation 29 Supervisors should have adequate powers to monitor and ensure compliance by financial institutions with requirements to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, including the authority to conduct inspections.
58 5.2.20 FIU (Financial Intelligence Units) An important recent development in the international approach to combating money laundering is the creation of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) around the world. An FIU is a centralized unit for financial intelligence, formed by a nation to protect its financial services sector, to detect criminal abuse of its financial system, and to ensure adherence to its laws against financial crime and money laundering. An FIU, quite simply, is a central office that receives disclosures of financial information, analyzes or processes them in some way and then provides them to appropriate government authorities in support of a national anti-money laundering effort. Some FIUs may also investigate and prosecute money laundering cases; some are actively involved in the development of their governments anti-money laundering policies and the administration of their anti-money laundering regulatory controls. FIUs typically have independent and unique relationships with banks, central banks, and law
Financial Intelligence Units were created to act as an interface between financial sector and law enforcement agencies for identification of suspicious money laundering activities requiring investigation. In 1995, some FIUs decided to establish an informal group known as the Egmont Group for promoting international cooperation amongst FIUs FIG 5.1: Role Of Financial Intelligence Unit
Source: Egmont Group report 2007. 1-Disclosures transmitted to FIU 59 2-FIU receives additional information from law enforcement 3-Possible exchange with foreign counterpart FIU 4-After analysis, FIU provide case to prosecutor for action
5.2.21 FIU-IND Is the central national agency of India responsible for receiving, processing, analyzing and disseminating information relating to suspect financial transactions. FIU-IND is also responsible for coordinating and strengthening efforts of national and international intelligence, investigation and enforcement agencies in pursuing the global efforts against money laundering and related crimes. Its prime responsibility is to gather and share financial intelligence in close cooperation with the regulatory authorities including RBI, SEBI and IRDA.
5.3 Conclusion The fight against money laundering has been mainly taken up by the developed countries of the world. USA has been the pioneer in this regard. International community has realized that money laundering is not restricted to a particular region or country, but is now a global activity and a complicated one. Thus many international and regional groups such as the Egmont Group, Asia/Pacific group and Financial Action Task Force have been founded. These groups have been actively engaged in setting standards and enhancing cooperation among the nations of the world. The Financial Action Task Force has stated 40 recommendations to be implemented by its member nations. India has initiated the recommendations in the field of finance and is thus adhering to international standards. Adhering to international standards is essential for India since otherwise launderers will view India as country with poor money laundering controls and it will become an attractive destination for launderers. Further India has been active in framing new legislations to concretely tackle the problem of money laundering and is currently in the process of framing a new PMLA Amendment Act, which shall be wider in scope and shall cover financing of terrorism too. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is a comprehensive legislation covering money laundering. Further India has also set up the FIU-IND in adherence to the FATF 40 recommendations. 60 CHAPTER 6: ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND COMPLIANCES
6.1 INTRODUCTION The basic objective of AML Measures is to have in place adequate policy, practice and procedure that promote professional standards and help prevent intermediaries from being used, intentionally or unintentionally for money laundering. KYC Standards and AML Measures would enable the Intermediaries to know/ understand its customers, the beneficial owners in case of non-individual entities, the principals behind customers who are acting as agents and their financial dealings better which in turn will help the intermediary to manage its risks prudently. The approach towards KYC Standards is based on risk perception and money laundering threats that may be posed by different types of customers. Alongwith KYC standards the law prescribes record keeping and submission of Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) to the appropriate regulatory agency. Intermediaries are largely guided by the KYC standards prescribed by SEBI for Depository Participants and/or Stock Brokers. This chapter looks to assess the measures and compliances is necessary to check money laundering activities.
61 TABLE 6.1: Depicts the various measures to be implemented by intermediaries registered under section 12 of the SEBI Act under various circulars Points to be implemented by Intermediary SEBI Circular Guidelines on Anti Money Laundering Standards (Dt 18/01/2006) SEBI Circular on Obligations of Intermediaries (Dt 20/3/2006) SEBI Master Circular on AML (Dt 22/12/2008) Depositories Circular on PMLA (Dt 12/11/2007) Maintenance of Records
Written Proper Policy Framework to be maintained
Appoint an Offficer as Principal Officer and intimate to FIU
Information to be maintained and period for which to be maintained
Implement Client Identification Programme
Report CTRs and STRs to FIU-IND
Incorporate Financial Status, Nature of Business in account opening form
Incorporate Consideration and Reasons in Delivery Instruction Slip used for off market trades
Customer Due Diligence
Monitoring of Transaction
Employee hiring and training
Source: Compiled from BSE Exchange Notices 62 6.2. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND COMPLIANCES TO COMBAT AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING
As per the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, every intermediary (which includes a stock-broker, sub-broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee to a trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment adviser and any other intermediary associated with securities market and registered under section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992) shall have to maintain a record of all the transactions; the nature and value of which has been prescribed in the Rules notified under the PMLA. Such transactions include: All cash transactions of the value of more than Rs 10 lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency. All series of cash transactions integrally connected to each other which have been valued below Rs 10 lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency where such series of transactions take place within one calendar month. All suspicious transactions whether or not made in cash.
6.2.1 WRITTEN ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING PROCEDURES Each registered intermediary should adopt written procedures. Such procedures should include inter alia, the following three specific parameters which are related to the overall Client Due Diligence Process:
Policy for Acceptance of clients Procedure for Identifying the clients Transaction monitoring and reporting especially Suspicious Transactions Reporting (STR)
63 6.2.2. CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE The customer due diligence (CDD) measures comprise the following: Obtaining sufficient information in order to identify persons who beneficially own or control securities account. Verify the customers identity using reliable, independent source documents, data or information; Identify beneficial ownership and control, i.e. determine which individual(s) ultimately own(s) or control(s) the customer and/or the person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted; Verify the identity of the beneficial owner of the customer and/or the person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. Conduct ongoing due diligence and scrutiny, i.e. perform ongoing scrutiny of the transactions and account throughout the course of the business relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the registered intermediarys knowledge of the customer, its business and risk profile, taking into account, where necessary, the customers source of funds.
6.2.3 POLICY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF CLIENTS All registered intermediaries should develop customer acceptance policies and procedures that aim to identify the types of customers that are likely to pose a higher than the average risk of money laundering. In a nutshell, the following safeguards are to be followed while accepting the clients:
1. No account is opened in a fictitious / benami name or on an anonymous basis.
2. Factors of risk perception (in terms of monitoring suspicious transactions) of the client are clearly defined having regard to clients location (registered office address, correspondence addresses and other addresses if applicable), nature of business activity, trading turnover etc. and manner of making payment for transactions undertaken. The parameters should enable 64 classification of clients into low, medium and high risk. Clients of special category (as given below) may, if necessary, be classified even higher. Such clients require higher degree of due diligence and regular update of KYC profile.
3. Documentation requirement and other information to be collected in respect of different classes of clients depending on perceived risk and having regard to the requirement to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, guidelines issued by RBI and SEBI from time to time. An indicative list of the nature and type of documents/information that may be relied upon for customer identification is given in Annexure-I.
4. Ensure that an account is not opened where the intermediary is unable to apply appropriate clients due diligence measures / KYC policies. This may be applicable in cases where it is not possible to ascertain the identity of the client, information provided to the intermediary is suspected to be non genuine, perceived non co-operation of the client in providing full and complete information. The market intermediary should not continue to do business with such a person and file a suspicious activity report.
5. The circumstances under which the client is permitted to act on behalf of another person / entity should be clearly laid down. It should be specified in what manner the account should be operated, transaction limits for the operation, additional authority required for transactions exceeding a specified quantity / value and other appropriate details.
6. Necessary checks and balance to be put into place before opening an account so as to ensure that the identity of the client does not match with any person having known criminal background or is not banned in any other manner, 65 whether in terms of criminal or civil proceedings by any enforcement agency worldwide.
6.2.4 RISK-BASED APPROACH It is generally recognized that certain customers may be of a higher or lower risk category depending on circumstances such as the customers background, type of business relationship or transaction etc. As such, the registered intermediaries should apply each of the customer due diligence measures on a risk sensitive basis. The basic principle enshrined in this approach is that the registered intermediaries should adopt an enhanced customer due diligence process for higher risk categories of customers. Conversely, a simplified customer due diligence process may be adopted for lower risk categories of customers.
Clients of Special Category (CSC) Such clients include the following- a. Non resident clients b. High networth clients, c. Trust, Charities, NGOs and organizations receiving donations d. Companies having close family shareholdings or beneficial ownership e. Politically exposed persons (PEP) of foreign origin f. Current / Former Head of State, Current or Former Senior High profile politicians and connected persons (immediate family, Close advisors and companies in which such individuals have interest or significant influence) g. Companies offering foreign exchange offerings h. Clients in high risk countries (where existence / effectiveness of money laundering controls is suspect, where there is unusual banking secrecy, Countries active in narcotics production, Countries where corruption (as per Transparency International Corruption Perception Index) is highly prevalent, Countries against which government sanctions are applied, Countries reputed to be any of the 66 following Havens / sponsors of international terrorism, offshore financial centers, tax havens, countries where fraud is highly prevalent. i. Non face to face clients j. Clients with dubious reputation as per public information available etc.
6.2.5 CLIENT IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE KYC is an acronym for Know your Client or Know your Client, a term commonly used for Client Identification Process. Pursuant to PMLA, SEBI has prescribed the certain requirements relating to KYC norms for Financial Institutions and Financial Intermediaries to 'know' their clients. This could be in the form of personal meetings or verification of identity and address, financial status, occupation and such other personal information. Many companies who do not have face-to-face transacting employ the verification route. The underlying principle is to follow the principles enshrined in the PMLA as well as the SEBI Act, 1992 so that the intermediary is aware of the clients on whose behalf it is dealing.The Know your Client (KYC) policy should clearly spell out the client identification procedure to be carried out at different stages. i.e. While establishing a business relationship (or) Carrying out a financial transaction (or) Where the intermediary has a doubt about the authenticity/veracity (or) Inadequacy of the previously obtained customer identification data if any. When the intermediary feels it is necessary to obtain additional information from the existing customers based on the conduct or behaviour of the account.
In order to further strengthen the KYC norms and identify every participant in the securities market with their respective PAN thereby ensuring sound audit trail of all the transactions, PAN has been made sole identification number for all participants transacting in the securities market.
67 All registered intermediaries should put in place necessary procedures to determine whether their existing/potential customer is a politically exposed person (PEP). Such procedures would include seeking additional information from clients, accessing publicly available information etc. All registered intermediaries are required to obtain senior management approval for establishing business relationships with Politically Exposed Persons. Where a customer has been accepted and the customer or beneficial owner is subsequently found to be, or subsequently becomes a PEP, registered intermediaries shall obtain senior management approval to continue the business relationship. The information should be adequate enough to satisfy competent authorities (regulatory / enforcement authorities) in future that due diligence was observed by the intermediary in compliance with the Guidelines. Each original document should be seen prior to acceptance of a copy.
Every intermediary shall formulate and implement a client identification programme. A copy of the client identification programme shall be forwarded to the Director, FIU- IND.
6.2.6 RECORD KEEPING Registered intermediaries should ensure compliance with the record keeping requirements contained in the SEBI Act, 1992, Rules and Regulations made there-under, PML Act, 2002 as well as other relevant legislation, Rules, Regulations, Exchange Bye- laws and Circulars.
Registered Intermediaries should maintain such records as are sufficient to permit reconstruction of individual transactions (including the amounts and types of currencies involved, if any) so as to provide, if necessary, evidence for prosecution of criminal behavior.
68 6.2.7 INFORMATION TO BE MAINTAINED Intermediaries are required to maintain and preserve the following information in respect of transactions referred to in Rule 3 of PMLA Rules: o The nature of the transactions; o The amount of the transaction and the currency in which it denominated; o The date on which the transaction was conducted; and o The parties to the transaction.
6.2.8 RETENTION OF RECORDS Intermediaries should take appropriate steps to evolve an internal mechanism for proper maintenance and preservation of such records and information in a manner that allows easy and quick retrieval of data as and when requested by the competent authorities. Further, the records mentioned in Rule 3 of PMLA Rules have to be maintained and preserved for a period of ten years from the date of cessation of the transactions between the client and intermediary.
Intermediaries are required to formulate and implement the client identification program containing the requirements as laid down in Rule 9 and such other additional requirements that it considers appropriate. The records of the identity of clients have to be maintained and preserved for a period of ten years from the date of cessation of the transactions between the client and intermediary.
In situations where the records relate to on-going investigations or transactions which have been the subject of a suspicious transaction reporting, they should be retained until it is confirmed that the case has been closed.
6.2.9 MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS Regular monitoring of transactions is vital for ensuring effectiveness of the Anti Money Laundering procedures. This is possible only if the intermediary has an understanding of 69 the normal activity of the client so that they can identify the deviant transactions / activities.
Intermediary should pay special attention to all complex, unusually large transactions / patterns which appear to have no economic purpose. The intermediary may specify internal threshold limits for each class of client accounts and pay special attention to the transaction which exceeds these limits.
The intermediary should ensure a record of transaction is preserved and maintained in terms of section 12 of the PMLA 2002 and that transaction of suspicious nature or any other transaction notified under section 12 of the act is reported to the appropriate law authority. Suspicious transactions should also be regularly reported to the higher authorities / head of the department. Further the compliance cell of the intermediary should randomly examine a selection of transaction undertaken by clients to comment on their nature i.e. whether they are in the suspicious transactions or not.
6.2.10 DESIGNATION OF AN OFFICER FOR REPORTING OF SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS To ensure that the registered intermediaries properly discharge their legal obligations to report suspicious transactions to the authorities, the Principal Officer would act as a central reference point in facilitating onward reporting of suspicious transactions and for playing an active role in the identification and assessment of potentially suspicious transactions. Names, designation and addresses (including e-mail addresses) of Principal Officer including any changes therein shall also be intimated to the Office of the Director-FIU. As a matter of principle, it is advisable that the Principal Officer is of a sufficiently higher position and is able to discharge his functions with independence and authority.
70 6.2.11 SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION MONITORING & REPORTING Intermediaries should ensure to take appropriate steps to enable suspicious transactions to be recognised and have appropriate procedures for reporting suspicious transactions. A list of circumstances which may be in the nature of suspicious transactions is given below: Table 6.2: Indicative List of Suspicious Activities Category Examples of Suspicious Transactions Identity of Client o Identification documents were found to be forged o Address details given by the account holder were found to be false o Doubt over the real beneficiary of the account Suspicious Background o Positive match of name and date of birth with person on various watch lists o Account of publicly known criminals Multiple Accounts o Large number of accounts having a common account holder, introducer or authorized signatory with no rationale or bona fide purpose o Unexplained transfers between multiple accounts with no rationale Activity in Accounts o Unexplained activity in dormant accounts o Unexplained activity in account inconsistent with what would be expected from declared business Nature of Transactions o Doubtful source of funds o Doubtful overseas fund transfer o Doubtful foreign remittance to non relatives o Doubtful cash deposits in a bank account at multiple locations o Suspicious use of ATM/ Credit card o Doubtful foreclosure of loan account in cash o Suspicious off-market transactions in demat accounts Value of Transactions o Multiple transactions of value just under the reporting threshold amount in an attempt to avoid reporting o Unexplained large value transaction inconsistent with the clients apparent financial standing
71 6.2.12 REPORTING TO FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT-INDIA In terms of the PMLA rules, intermediaries are required to report information relating to cash and suspicious transactions to the Director, Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU- IND) TABLE 6.3:Obligations Of Reporting Entity Under PMLA OBLIGATION DETAILS WHEN Communicate details of Principal Officer Communicate the name, designation and address of the Principal Officer to FIU-IND At the time of appointment/change of principal officer Verify identity of Clients Verify identity, current address including permanent address, nature of business and financial status of the client At the time of opening an account as well as executing any transaction Implement a Client Identification Programme Formulate and implement a client identification programme to determine true identity of clients and forward a copy of the same to FIU-IND At the time of formulation /modification of CIP Evolve internal mechanism for maintaining and furnishing information Details of the internal mechanism have been prescribed by the respective regulators Ongoing Furnish Information of cash transactions Furnish Cash Transaction (CTR) to FIU-IND containing details of: All cash transactions of the value of more than rupees ten lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency
All series of transactions integrally connected to each other which have been valued below rupees ten lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency where such series of transactions have taken place within a month Within 15 th day of the succeeding month (Monthly Reporting) Furnishing information of counterfeit currency transactions Furnish Counterfeit Currency Report (CCR) to FIU-IND containing details of all cash transactions where forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes have been used as genuine or where any forgery of a valuable security or a document has taken facilitating the transactions. Within 7 days from the date of the transaction. Furnishing Information of Suspicious Transactions Furnish STR to FIU-IND containing details of all suspicious transactions whether or not made in cash Within 7 working days on being satisfied that the transaction is suspicious Maintain and Retain records Maintain records of identity of clients and records of all transactions reported to FIU-IND For a period of Ten years after cessation of relationship with the client FINES Director, FIU-IND is empowered to levy fine on reporting entities of not less than Rs. Ten thousand which may extend to Rs. One lakh for each failure 72 Table 6.4: Suspicion Transaction Report (STR) Submitted by Category to FIU-IND Category 2006-07 2007-08 Percentage Increase Banks 437 1183 271% Financial Institutions 88 288 327% Intermediaries 292 445 152% Source: FIU-IND Annual report 2007-08
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, which makes it compulsory for financial sector to report suspicious transactions to the FIU-IND, came into effect in the year 2005, since then Financial Institutions have shown the most remarkable growth in terms Suspicious Transactions Reported (STR) to the FIU-IND, followed by Banks. Intermediaries such as brokers have recorded the lowest growth in terms of STRs reported. This trend could be explained by the fact that launderers use mostly use banks and financial institutions during the placement stage wherein cash enters the financial system as compared to that, intermediaries are used during the layering and integration phase of the laundering process, when funds are already present in the system. Hence Intermediaries are not being able to detect such activities. Thus leading to such low rate of report filings.
FIG 6.1: Type of Suspicion Reported in STRs Type of Suspicion Reported in STRs 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Years N o .
o f
S T R s 2006-07 2007-08 2006-07 107 79 164 287 159 176 112 817 2007-08 395 97 129 695 682 488 338 1916 Identity of Client Background of Client Multiple Accounts Activity in the Account Nature of the transactions Value of the transactions Miscellaneou s Total
Source: FIU-IND Annual report 2007-08
73 FIG 6.1 graphically displays the type of suspicions which have been reported in STRs submitted to the FIU-IND during the two years of its operation. It is observed from the graph that the type of suspicions reported to FIU have been mainly in the nature of: activity in the account, nature of the transaction and value of the transaction. These 3 heads of suspicion have also seen much of the increase in STRs reported in the year 2007-08 over the year 2006-07. This implies that intermediaries must implement effective monitoring mechanisms to monitor transactions.
Table 6.5: STR Processing Stage Wise Category 2006-07 2007-08 Total STRs Received 817 1916 2733 STRs Brought forward from Previous Year - 171 STRs Processed 646 2001 2647 STRs Disseminated 391 935 1326 Percentage of STRs Disseminated to STRs Processed 60.5% 46.7% 50%
Table 6.5 depicts the Suspicious Transaction Reports handled by Financial Intelligence Unit-IND. Thus FIU work has mainly related to two heads i.e. STR Processing and STR dissemination to the appropriate law enforcement agency. Only after STR are processed they are disseminated to the enforcement agency. Over the years 2006-07 to 2007-08, it can be observed that percentage of STRs Disseminated to STRs Processed has declined. It can be inferred that eventhough STRs reported have increased significantly over the year, the quality of STR being reported are poor leading to such low dissemination.
Hiring of Employees The registered intermediaries should have adequate screening procedures in place to ensure high standards when hiring employees. They should identify the key positions within their own organization structures having regard to the risk of money laundering 74 and the size of their business and ensure the employees taking up such key positions are suitable and competent to perform their duties.
Employees Training Intermediaries must have an ongoing employee training programme so that the members of the staff are adequately trained in AML procedures. Training requirements should have specific focuses for frontline staff, back office staff, compliance staff, risk management staff and staff dealing with new customers. It is crucial that all those concerned fully understand the rationale behind these guidelines, obligations and requirements, implement them consistently and are sensitive to the risks of their systems being misused by unscrupulous elements.
Investors Education Implementation of AML measures requires intermediaries to demand certain information from investors which may be of personal nature or which has hitherto never been called for. Such information can include documents evidencing source of funds/income tax returns/bank records etc. This can sometimes lead to raising of questions by the customer with regard to the motive and purpose of collecting such information. There is, therefore, a need for intermediaries to sensitize their customers about these requirements as the ones emanating from AML framework. Intermediaries should prepare specific literature/ pamphlets etc. so as to educate the customer of the objectives of the AML programme.
6.3 Conclusion SEBI alongwith Self Regulatory Organisations like Stock Exchanges have been actively involved in ensuring Anti-Money Laundering Measures and Controls. Eventhough much of the Anti-Money Laundering compliances to be implemented are dictated by regulations, financial intermediaries are slowly moving to voluntary and wider anti- money laundering standards than that laid down by the regulatory agencies. In terms of reporting suspicious transaction to the FIU-IND, the STRs reported have increased significantly showing that intermediaries and financial institutions are much more pro- 75 active in ensuring money laundering compliance. However Intermediaries have shown the lowest growth in STRs reported. Much of the Anti-Money Laundering measures revolve around the 7 key elements i.e. Risk Classification, Customer Acceptance Policy and Identification procedures, Reporting, On-going Monitoring Processes, Reporting, Customer and Staff education and awareness. 76 CHAPTER 7: SUMMARY, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter seeks to present the key findings of the project in a summarized and brief manner.
7.2 SUMMARY The basic idea underlying money laundering is to disguise the illegal origin of the illicit funds so that the illicit funds look like they have arisen from a legal source. With the evolution of newer technologies and offshore financial centres, money laundering has attained a global characteristic. Money Laundering has evolved into a Professional and Complex Activity. Money laundering is a continuous process and involves a chain of transactions. A typical money laundering transaction follows a three stage process consisting of Placement, Layering and Integration. The biggest problem for a launderer is that cash is bulky. The Second Biggest problem for a launderer is that most financial transactions leave an audit trail. Money laundering now ranks as the third largest business globally after foreign exchange and oil Globally launderers use a variety of methods and techniques to launder funds. Every stage in the money laundering process has certain distinctive methods and techniques which the money launderers employ. In India, Hawala, Import/Export transactions, smuggling of currency and the use of tax havens are the most prevalent form of money laundering techniques Securities Market is mostly used during the layering and integration phases of the money laundering process. Launderer through stock purchase method purchases securities with illicit funds and then uses the proceeds from selling these securities as legitimate money. Brokerage and investment firm occupy the second highest position in terms of susceptibility to money laundering activities after Banks. 77 Money laundering activities have been shifting from the banking sector to the non-bank sector. Derivatives Exchanges are also being employed by launderers to launder funds. In India the key methods used to launder funds through capital markets have been by using Penny Stocks, Listed Companies, Participatory Notes and Depositories. In the case of participatory notes, the government has been reluctant in curbing the flows coming from through this route. Launderers use two methods for the purpose of money laundering i.e. stock market operations and stock market manipulation. Increased vigilance by authorities in the major financial centres to combat money laundering activity provides an incentive for launderers to shift their activities to emerging markets. Financial Institutions are very essential for the development of emerging economies. Financial Institutions are exposed to specific risks such as reputational risks, operational risks and legal risks. Money laundering also has a negative effect on the real sector, external sector, business sector as well as the social aspect. The international community has taken the issue of money laundering very seriously. And thus formulated plethora of legislations to tackle the problem. Pioneer among the countries has been USA which has been actively involved in fighting the problem. International community has recognized the fact that money laundering is not restricted to a certain region only but is a global problem. Hence cooperation between nations has been emphasized. It has also been realized that money laundering targets those countries with loose money laundering controls. India too has taken legislative steps to actively tackle the problem of money laundering through enactment of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Currently India is in the process of amending the Prevention of Money 78 Laundering Act, 2002 to include within its fold terrorist financing and inclusion of non-financial professionals. India has largely complied with the FATF Recommendations as applicable to the financial markets. Anti-Money laundering measures have been laid down by the SEBI Guidelines as applicable to intermediaries and by the PMLA Act, 2002. Much of the Anti-Money Laundering measures revolve around the 7 key elements i.e. Risk Classification, Customer Acceptance Policy and Identification procedures, On-going Monitoring Processes, Record-Keeping, Reporting, Customer education and awareness, Staff education and awareness. Obligations for intermediary reporting and the time frame for reporting have been set out under the PMLA Rules. Intermediaries have recorded the lowest growth in terms of STRs reported to FIU-IND.
7.3 FINDINGS
7.3.1 To compare and contrast various money laundering methods/techniques being practiced in India and abroad Laundering from its earlier days of laundering funds through Laundromats has evolved into a complex and global activity, which makes use of new technologies, offshore centres and professionals. Every stage in the laundering process i.e. Placement, Layering and Integration has a distinctive set of laundering methods or techniques. In India the most prominent techniques used to launder money are Hawala system, use of tax havens, import/export transactions and smuggling of currency. Brokerage and Investment firms occupy the second highest position in terms of susceptibility to laundering activities. Launderers are shifting laundering activities from the banking sector to the non- banking financial sector. 79 Laundering through stock exchanges in India have occurred through use of penny stocks, use of listed companies, use of participatory notes and use of depositories. Government has shown reluctance in curbing flows coming from the offshore derivative instrument route. This is on account of large capital inflows coming through this route are very important for a developing economy like India.
7.3.2 To assess and evaluate socio-economic impact of money laundering activities as a whole to the economy, with special focus on financial markets Launderers seek countries with loose anti-money laundering controls. With countries of the west enforcing strict anti-money laundering norms, launderers are shifting to developing countries which have loose anti-money laundering controls. For developing countries such capital flows are important for economic development. Hence they tend to postpone action against such flows of capital thus allowing crime to become entrenched. Laundering impacts various constituents of the economy, finally impacting the entire economy as a whole.
7.3.3 To compare and contrast legislative measures presently existing for anti- money laundering in India and abroad. The current anti-money laundering measures have evolved from various legislations. The beginnings of the fight against money laundering centered around banking institutions. From the year 1988 onwards the thrust area widened to include drugs. USA has been highly active in the fight against money laundering. Post 9/11 USA has furthered its fight against money laundering by covering financing of terrorism by enacting the PATRIOT Act, 2001. Financial Action Task Force has laid down universal standards to be applied by all its member countries. India has applied all the recommendations as applicable to financial institutions and intermediaries. Thus India is adhering to international standards in protecting itself from money laundering. 80 7.3.4 To examine the checks used by stock brokers and intermediaries for ensuring effective anti-money laundering compliance. Much of the Anti-Money Laundering measures revolve around the 7 key elements i.e. Risk Classification, Customer Acceptance Policy and Identification procedures, On-going Monitoring Processes, Record-Keeping, Reporting, Customer education and awareness, Staff education and awareness. Intermediaries have recorded the lowest growth in terms of STRs reported. This trend could be explained by the fact that launderers use mostly use banks and financial institutions during the placement stage wherein cash enters the financial system as compared to that, intermediaries are used during the layering and integration phase of the laundering process, when funds are already present in the system. Hence Intermediaries are not being able to detect such activities. Thus leading to such low rate of report filings. Much of the STRs filed with FIU-IND have related to transactions of the clients. Thus it is imperative for intermediaries to effectively monitor transactions. STRs processed have increased significantly however dissemination have reduced, this could indicate that the quality of STRs filed have been poor or without sufficient analysis.
7.4 CONCLUSION Capital market integrity can only be ensured when laundered funds are not allowed to mix with pure capital. If capital markets consist of healthy funds from legal sources, it leads to the creation of a healthy and vibrant capital market which in turn boosts corporate growth and gives the economy a strong foundation. Anti-money laundering measures and compliances weed out the bad money and allow only pure capital to enter the capital market. India has in place an effective anti-money laundering control system which adheres to universal standards. However intermediaries on their part have to be vigilant to see that anti-money laundering measures are implemented in letter as well as in spirit.
81 ANNEXURE I: Customer Identification Procedure Features to be verified and documents that may be obtained from customers Type of Entity Documents to be verified Individuals
(i) Passport (ii) PAN card (iii) Voter's Identity Card (iv) Driving licence (v) Identity card (vi) Letter from a recognized public authority or public servant verifying the identity and residence of the customer to the satisfaction of bank (i) Telephone bill (ii) Bank account statement (iii) Letter from any recognized public authority (iv) Electricity bill (v) Ration card (vi) Letter from employer (any one document which provides customer information) Companies (i) Certificate of incorporation and Memorandum & Articles of Association (ii) Resolution of the Board of Directors to open an account and identification of those who have authority to operate the account (iii) Power of Attorney granted to its managers, officers or employees to transact business on its behalf (iv) Copy of PAN allotment letter (v) Copy of the telephone bill Partnership Firms (i) Registration certificate, if registered (ii) Partnership deed (iii) Power of Attorney granted to a partner or an employee of the firm to transact business on its behalf (iv) Any officially valid document identifying the Partners and the persons holding the Power of Attorney and their addresses (v) Telephone bill in the name of firm/partners Trusts & Foundations (i) Certificate of registration, if registered (ii) Power of Attorney granted to transact Business on its behalf (iii) Any officially valid document to identify the trustees, settlers, beneficiaries and those holding Power of Attorney, founders/managers/ Directors and their addresses (iv) Resolution of the managing body of the foundation / association (v) Telephone bill