Apple: Big Business, Big Problems

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Archive of Denebola

RSS Feed Mobile


Denebola
Home
Current Issue
Archives
About
Advertising
Sections
50th Edition
Arts and Entertainment
Baseball
Book Review
Centerfold
Denebola
Denebologues
Editorials and Opinions
Education
Features
Global Education
Global Education
Lifestyle
News
News
Photos
Sports
Sports
Sports Shorts
T&F
Volleyball
Denebola
The Official Newspaper of Newton South High School
140 Brandeis Road
Newton Center, MA 02459
Phone: 617-559-6572, 617-559-2085
Email: denebola@denebolaonline.net
Global Education
Search
Apple: big business, big problems
By Stevie Kreimendahl
Published: June 2010
iPod. iPhone. iPad. iMac. The world cannot get enough of Apples products.
On Wednesday May 25, Apple Inc. passed Microsoft Corporation in market capitalization (the number
shares times the shares price) to become the most valuable technology company in the world.
Even with this great financial success, Apple has been put under scrutiny for labor issues in its overseas
suppliers factories.
On Tuesday May 25, the Foxconn Technology Group, one of Apples major manufacturers in China, had
its tenth employee suicide in the past year, all from jumping off buildings.
There have also been a few dozen other failed suicide attempts. All the suicides have been by workers
between the age of 18 and 24.
Apple is committed to ensuring the highest standards of social responsibility wherever Apple products are
made, a spokesperson from Apple said.
In the 2010 Supplier Responsibility Report Apple published, it audited 102 facilities to see if they complied
with its Supplier Code of Conduct.
The Code of Conduct includes limiting working hours to 60 hours per week (including overtime), requiring
minimum wage and benefits consistent with local laws, and clean and safe dormitories with adequate heat,
ventilation, personal space, and entry and exit privileges.
Apple found that only 72 percent complied within the Labor and Human Rights category and 76 percent in
the Health and Safety category.
The conditions at the Faxconn factory have been described by labor activists in China as sweatshop-like,
with repetitive dull work. They also allow the workers to work as much overtime as they want, even past
the legal limit.
This negative atmosphere has led many to kill themselves, leaving notes to their family that they are sorry
they could not have become something more.
Foxconn has also shown concern with the high number of suicides. They said they plan on putting up nets
around many of the buildings to stop them.
Apple says it is talking with the violators and that all the issues are discussed and resolved.
If the facility refuses to comply, Apple says it will end business with them, but this has not happened yet.
One of the suicides from last June was because of a lost iPhone prototype leaked to the public.
The security guards at Foxconn harassed and abused the worker who lost one iPhone, before he killed
himself. Apple did respond to this by requiring that its suppliers must treat workers with respect and
dignity.
This is not the first time that Apple and its manufactures have been in the news for major labor issues in the
past year.
The beginning of 2010 marked a poor start for Apple.
One East China LCD plant went on strike because they had to use a banned, toxic cleaner to clean the
Apple iPads screens. The use of the cleaner was immediately stopped and the manager who suggested it
was fired.
A few weeks later Apple revealed that at one plant there where workers as young as 15 year old, below the
local minimum working age of 16.
These are only two of the issues Apple has recently had, and it appears they try to deal with them on a case-
by-case situation, only when incidents receives widespread media attention.
Apple has many issues with labor violation at their suppliers factories because many of them are located in
China, Taiwan, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and the Czech Republic; countries with
limited and for the most part unenforced labor laws.
If Apple were to stop its contracts with Supplier Code of Conduct violators, they would have to find
facilities in countrys with stricter laws.
This situation would cost Apple more money for the parts, ultimately cutting into their profit. A measly
$3.07 billion in the first three months of 2010.
Read more
1. Outsourcing caf still in question
2. Chinese teacher experiences nations past
3. Hyatt Hotels Corporations unresolved injustices
4. Google threatens to pull out of China after hacking scare
Like it? Share it!
ShareThis Print
Denebola Global Education Apple: big business, big problems
Copyright Denebola | The Official School Newspaper of Newton South High School | 140 Brandeis
Road, Newton, MA 02459.
Site designed by Chenzhe Cao.

You might also like