Over the years, science and technology has grown leaps and bounds to achieve things we would

have never thought possible. With fast-paced developments in both fields of science and
technology working together, every day we are seemingly making the impossible possible. These
advancements have greatly impacted healthcare and will continue to do so. The advancement in
technology is happening on a daily basis and it seems as though the skys the limit for what
humans are able to do. Introducing technology in health care produces various factors that can be
advantageous or harmful to the treatment and cure of patients. This poses the question of whether
technology use in health care good or bad?
The advancement in the genetic field has made it is possible for genetic screening and genetic
therapy to take place. Gene therapy has been subjected to controversial debate since the 1990s.
The notion to use gene therapy to alter ourselves or our children poses many questions as where
do we draw the line. Should the use of gene therapy be used to alter disease-causing genes or
should it be used to repair or enhance genetic material? The distinction between the use of gene
therapy for the purpose of treating disease and the use for purposes of enhancement individuals
should be made (Tong, 2007).
We are at a point in time where the application of genetic enhancement technologies can
improve intellectual, physical, psychological and moral human capacities (Walters & Palmer,
1997). Through genetic enhancement, we can effectively become more intelligent by increasing
memory capacity and cognitive abilities. Physical enhancements will be quite popular as many
will desire to be taller, stronger, and of course, look younger. Some psychological enhancements
include reduced shyness and increased sociability. We can even undergo moral enhancements to
become more kind and sympathetic (Baylis & Robert, 2004). The idea of genetic enhancement
seems very promising to say the least, but just because we can do it, does not mean we should do
it. But maybe the most important question we must ask ourselves is ought we do it?
There are many ethical concerns surrounding the issue of genetic enhancement technologies.
One of the main concerns is what the technology will be used for. Will we be more interested in
moral enhancements or physical enhancements? Also, there is the concern that some will abuse
the technology with the intentions of doing harm. Others are not so much concerned with the
enhancements themselves, but rather the underlying motivations (Parens, 1999). Proponents of
the technology say that we should use our genetic knowledge to actually enhance human
capabilities, rather than just heal and restore. Advocates believe that genetic enhancement
technologies are inevitable because humans are competitive beings, always looking for new and
challenging opportunities to maximize personal, social, and economic advantage (Baylis &
Robert, 2004). The purpose of this paper is to argue that genetic enhancement technologies are
ethically impermissible by demonstrating (1) from a deontological perspective, the means matter
morally, therefore genetic enhancements present an unfair advantage, (2) from a utilitarian
standpoint, it introduces a an unacceptable risk of harm biologically, genetically, and socially,
(3) it undermines the principles of autonomy.

Find out more from UK Essays here: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/philosophy/ethical-
analysis-of-genetic-enhancement-technologies-philosophy-essay.php#ixzz3CoNwXmDb
One of the funniest things about human nature is that nothing is ever good enough. No matter how
good we are at something, there will always be someone in those 6 billion plus who can do it better. My
mom told me that when I was a kid playing soccer in the back yard. They don't sound like the words of
encouragement you might expect from a nurturing mother to an aspiring child but it was true. No
matter how long I practiced, how many goals I scored, games I won, trophies I put on the shelf of my
bedroom, there would always be someone, somewhere who could do me one up. When faced with this
thought, we have a choice to make. Give up and accept life for what it is, try to enjoy every moment and
yield to share the glory with the word, or try harder. Obsess over the prospect of achieving perfection
and stop at nothing: all for that that one moment, that one instant when we ARE the best.

People are like technology, they may be the newest hottest thing on the market but lined up for years
behind them are thousands of advancements and improvements, maybe still in the works, but
chomping at the bit to break out on the world and push even farther. So what's the point? What's the
moral we are supposed to derive from all this? No moral. No point. Just a thought I think is pertinent to
the changing tides out there in the battle we all face to be the best we can be. How far will we take it?
What is advancement and what is too much?

We live in an interesting time. Information technology is growing rapidly, new products and ideas
popping up every day in relation to every field. By the same token biology and chemistry are as strong as
they have every been, discoveries in medicine and health care are booming. So what happens when
these potent ingredients are thrown together? What happens when we apply IT to biology? Well we
already are, weve been doing it for years. Doctors and Scientists couldn't accomplish anything without
their computers. The human Genome project could never have even existed if not for computers and
the special software used.