INTRODUCTION International benchmarks differ from U.S equity benchmarks as: Float adjustment is more important for international stocks. International equity markets are divided into developed & emerging categories (category has consequences for the benchmarks & countries). Local currency & investor currency versions of benchmark. Categorization (b/w emerging & developed category) is a complex matter. 1. EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF INDEXES Early indexes were complied by news papers, were price-only & not cap weighted. MSCI followed the basic principles of good index construction (cap weighted, publication of constituents etc.) but capture only 60% of market cap of the countries & sectors it covered. Investors should invest internationally for many reasons (diversification, different industrial mix etc).
2. NEED FOR FLOAT ADJUSTMENT Cross holdings (cause double counting) & closely held ownership requires free float adjustment. Now float adjusted indexes are popular & constructed by the entire international index providers.
3. INTERNATIONAL EQUITY INDEXES COMPARED Major providers of international equity indexes include MSCI, FTSE, citigroup, S&P & Dow jones & company. Trade-Offs in Constructing International Indexes Breadth V/S Investability Liquidity & crossing Opportunities Versus Index Reconstitution Effects Breadth coverage of the index. Investability readily buying & selling of stocks with minimum price pressure & transaction costs. Take extra measure of choosing an index that errs on the side of greater liquidity & less breadth. Popular & most widely used indexes have greater index-level liquidity. More liquid indexes have greater crossing opportunities (matching buying & selling orders without using brokers i.e. no transaction cost). Program trades on liquid benchmarks involve low bid-ask spread from broker. Popular indexes may suffer from reconstitution (inclusion & deletion) effect. () price pressure when stocks choosen for inclusion (deletion). Detrimental to performance (no negative alpha as reconstitution effects both the benchmark & investors portfolio). 1
Copyright FinQuiz.com. All rights reserved. 2013, Study Session # 12, Reading # 29
Trade-Offs in Constructing International Indexes Precise Float Adjustment V/S Transaction Costs from Rebalancing Objectivity and Transparency V/S Judgment Frequent float adjustments. transaction costs. Float Band Precise Float Adjustments Free float bands are categories e.g. 75-100 percent. Less transaction costs (only when outside the float band). Benchmark constituents are easy to predict. More effective trading. Easier to understand. Use as proxies for asset classes in asset allocation. Judgment Based Index Construction Rule Based Index Construction May be difficult to defend. The advantages of this method (e.g. liquidity) may overcome disadvantage of this method.
4. CLASSIFICATION OF COUNTRIES AS DEVELOPED OR EMERGING Leading developed market index providers are also leading providers of EM benchmarks. Boundary between Developed and Emerging Markets A countrys category (developed or emerging) has consequences for benchmark & county itself. When a country has large market cap in EM index, it is a huge player in a small market. For any country, being in a developed index is highly desirable as more capital is committed to developed rather to EM & as new source of capital becomes available to that countrys companies. Acceptance of Integrated Indexes Today, the developed-emerging distinction seems less important because the largest companies in the EM are traded on NYSE (meet transparency & liquidity standards). Integrated mandates (a single manager to invest in all non-U.S. markets) are growing rapidly as a result of the transparency & liquidity.
5. IMPACT OF BENCHMARKING ON INTERNATIONAL MARKETS Examples 2