Author(s): Hirokazu Toju, Harue Abe, Saneyoshi Ueno, Yoshiyuki Miyazawa, Fumiya Taniguchi, Teiji Sota, and Tetsukazu Yahara Reviewed work(s): Source: The American Naturalist, Vol. 177, No. 5 (May 2011), pp. 562-573 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The American Society of Naturalists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659624 . Accessed: 28/11/2012 06:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Naturalist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions vol. 177, no. 5 the american naturalist may 2011 Climatic Gradients of Arms Race Coevolution Hirokazu Toju, 1,2, * Harue Abe, 3 Saneyoshi Ueno, 4 Yoshiyuki Miyazawa, 5 Fumiya Taniguchi, 6 Teiji Sota, 1 and Tetsukazu Yahara 7 1. Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; 2. Hakubi Center, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606- 8501, Japan; 3. Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Miyagi 989-6711, Japan; 4. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan; 5. University Forest of Kyushu, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 811-2415, Japan; 6. National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science, Kagoshima 898-0087, Japan; 7. Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan Submitted July 5, 2010; Accepted December 28, 2010; Electronically published April 8, 2011 Online enhancement: appendix. Dryad data: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8186. abstract: In nature, spatiotemporally dynamic coevolutionary pro- cesses play major roles in the foundation and maintenance of bio- diversity. Here, we examined the arms race coevolution involving a seed-eating weevil with a long snout and its camellia plant host with a thick fruit coat (pericarp) throughout the marked climatic gradient observed across the Japanese islands. Results demonstrated that fe- male weevils, which bored holes through camellia pericarps to lay eggs into seeds, had evolved much longer snouts than males, espe- cially in areas in which Japanese camellia pericarps were very thick. The thickness of the plant pericarp was heritable, and the camellia plant evolved a signicantly thicker pericarp on islands with the weevil than on islands without it. Across populations with weevils, resource allocation to plant defense increased with increasing annual mean temperature or annual precipitation, thereby geographically differentiating the evolutionary and ecological interactions between the two species. Given that the coevolutionary relationship exhibited appreciable variation across a relatively small range of annual mean temperatures, ongoing global climatic change can dramatically alter the coevolutionary process, thereby changing the ecological inter- action between these species. Keywords: arms race, climate change, coevolution, host-parasite, prey-predator, productivity gradient. Introduction One of the major challenges in science is to understand how anthropogenic changes in the global environment al- ter coevolving networks of biological communities (Thompson 2005; Benkman et al. 2007). Researchers have recently acknowledged that global climate change rapidly alters the ecological processes of plant-pollinator (Hegland et al. 2009), plant-herbivore (van Asch and Visser 2006), host-parasite (Brooks and Hoberg 2007), and prey-pred- ator (Durant et al. 2007) systems by causing phenological * Corresponding author; e-mail: toju@terra.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp. Am. Nat. 2011. Vol. 177, pp. 562573. 2011 by The University of Chicago. 0003-0147/2011/17705-52288$15.00. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1086/659624 and geographical range mismatches between partner spe- cies or by altering energy ow through trophic levels (Par- mesan 2006; Tylianakis et al. 2008). Another recent con- ceptual advance is the recognition that environmental change can alter the form and strength of natural selection on traits mediating interspecic interactions within short time periods, for example, during several or fewer decades (Grant and Grant 2002; see also Thompson 1998; Kinnison and Hendry 2001; Carroll et al. 2007). These rapid evo- lutionary changes are expected to alter the population dy- namics of interacting species (Yoshida et al. 2003; Hairston et al. 2005; terHorst et al. 2010), the intensity of ecological interactions (Carroll et al. 2005), and the composition of local communities (Whitham et al. 2006). Nonetheless, few studies have integrated investigations of reciprocal adaptive processes and knowledge of the potential impacts of climate change on ecological processes. Accordingly, to further understand how biological communities will re- spond to ongoing climate change, environmental depen- dence of coevolutionary dynamics should be intensively investigated. Recent coevolutionary studies have shown that recip- rocal adaptive processes of interacting species are dynam- ical in space and time due to various mechanisms and factors such as local community structure or spatiotem- porally varying ecological conditions (Thompson 1999, 2005, 2009). In a variety of interspecic systems, traits mediating coevolutionary interactions vary across popu- lations (Benkman 1999; Brodie et al. 2002; Zangerl and Berenbaum 2003; Toju and Sota 2006a, 2006b), and the processes underlying the diversication of the coevolving traits are attributed to geographic selection mosaics (Sie- pielaki and Benkman 2004; Toju 2007), in which the genotype-by-genotype evolutionary interactions between species differ among local environments ( in- G #G #E teractions; Thompson 2005, 2009). Likewise, environmen- tal conditions potentially determine the intensity of eco- logical interactions between species (e.g., predation or This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Climatic Gradients of Coevolution 563 parasitization rate), thereby inuencing the direction and strength of local coevolutionary selection (Forde et al. 2004; Lopez-Pascua et al. 2010). For example, in host- parasite interactions, high growth rates of host populations (i.e., high productivity) can entail the rapid increase of parasites and the resulting severe parasitization pressure can promote the evolution of host defense and the coun- terevolution of parasite offense (Hochberg and van Baalen 1998; Sasaki and Godfray 1999). Therefore, if the birth rates of a host species are determined by local environ- mental conditions, ecological and evolutionary interac- tions with its parasite would be differentiated among pop- ulations (Forde et al. 2004; Lopez-Pascua et al. 2010). Thus, the snapshots of the curent spatial mosaics of coevolutionary interactions provide valuable opportunities for inferring the potential effects of climatic environments on the ecological and evolutionary processes of interspe- cic interactions in nature. An ideal system for elucidating the environmental de- pendence of coevolutionary processes can be observed in the geographically structured interaction involving a weevil with an extremely long drill and its host plant featuring a thick defensive wall (Toju and Sota 2006a, 2006b, 2009; Toju 2007). Females of the camellia weevil (Curculio ca- melliae; Coleoptera: Curculionidae) use their snouts to bore through the thick pericarp of the fruit of the Japanese camellia (Camellia japonica; Theaceae) and deposit their eggs into the camellia seeds using long ovipositors (g. 1A1G). Our previous study showed that the longer the snouts of the weevil, the more likely the boreholes will reach seeds, whereas the thicker the camellia pericarps, the more likely the plant will successfully protect its seeds (Toju and Sota 2006b). The observed geographic corre- lation between the snout length of female weevils and camellia pericarp thickness across populations (Toju and Sota 2006a, 2006b; Toju 2008) suggested that at least each species has locally adapted to the other and the entire area of these interactions represents a geographic mosaic of coevolution (Brodie et al. 2002; Thompson 2005; Beren- baum and Zangerl 2006; Thompson and Fernandez 2006). Our previous studies have further shown that the extent of the weevil-camellia arms race varied along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients (Toju and Sota 2006b; Toju 2008, 2009), suggesting that some kinds of climatic factors are responsible for the geographic differentiation of the co- evolutionary processes. Here, we conduct a comprehensive survey of climatic factors organizing the spatiotemporally dynamic process of the weevil-camellia coevolution. The aim of this study is fourfold. First, by focusing on sexually dimorphic traits of the camellia weevil and the thickness of camellia peri- carps in populations without weevils, we show some lines of novel evidence that bizarre morphologies of the weevil and the plant have evolved through a reciprocal adaptive process. Second, the heritability of camellia pericarp thick- ness is estimated using a method based on molecular ge- netic markers (Ritland 2000) to further discuss the evo- lution of the plant defense. Third, we examine the relationship between local climatic conditions and the level of camellias resource investment to defense. In this anal- ysis, we compare camellia populations with and without weevils, thereby inferring the defenseless phenotype that probably represents the minimum thickness of pericarps required for buffering external environmental stresses other than infestation by the camellia weevil. Finally, in conjunction with our previous phylogeographic studies on the system (Toju and Sota 2006c, 2009), we discuss how the weevil-camellia coevolutionary interaction has re- sponded to global climate change during the last glacial and postglacial periods. Our analysis concludes by pro- posing that even slight changes in climate can dramatically alter coevolutionary dynamics, thereby altering the various ecological functions of biological interactions. Material and Methods Study System The Japanese camellia is an evergreen broad-leaved tree that is common in warm-temperate forests in Japan, Ko- rea, and Taiwan. Seeds of this plant are attacked by a weevil species, the camellia weevil, whose larvae grow by exclu- sively infesting the plant seeds. This weevil is an agricul- tural pest of Japanese camellia seeds (Saito and Suzuki 1982). Females of the weevil are characterized by their very long snouts, which they use to bore through the thick fruit coats (pericarps) of camellias to make holes that are used for oviposition (g. 1A1G). After the maturation of seeds, the woody, hard pericarps dehisce and seeds fall to the ground (g. 1B). Larvae of a lepidopteran species and unknown birds occasionally bore the camellia pericarp and utilize the seed as a (presumably temporary) food source. However, predation by those species is very rare (Toju 2008; H. Toju, personal observation) compared to that by the camellia weevil. Our previous studies (Toju and Sota 2006a, 2006b) showed that the pericarp thickness of the Japanese camellia was positively correlated with the snout length of female camellia weevils across populations over a 700-km transect in Japan, suggesting that the plant had been involved in an evolutionary interaction with the camellia weevil. In fact, an analysis of natural selection revealed that the weevil exerted geographically variable selection pressure on ca- mellia pericarps, potentially promoting the adaptive di- versication of the plant populations (Toju and Sota 2006b; Toju 2007). Given that gene ow between popu- This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Climatic Gradients of Coevolution 565 Figure 1: Study system. A, Female (below) and male (above) camellia weevils. B, Japanese camellia fruit. After seed maturation, camellia fruits dehisce (upper right), and seeds attached to the fruit columns fall to the ground. C, Cross section of a camellia fruit. D, Female weevil boring into a camellia fruit. Arrows indicate bores made by the weevil. E, Female weevil inserting its ovipositor into a camellia fruit. F, Snout length of a female weevil. G, Ovipositor length. Red lines indicate the length of the chitinous fragment supporting the distal half of soft ovipositor tissue (ovipositor length in this study). A dissected ovipositor is also shown with a head (lower left). H, Study sites. The morphological analysis of the Japanese camellia populations was conducted with (red) and without (blue) the camellia weevil. See table A2 in the online edition of the American Naturalist for the abbreviation of islands. Yellow circles indicate the study sites for the weevil morphological analysis (table A1). I, Sexual dimorphism of weevil snout length. In each sex, snout length (SD) was regressed against the pericarp thickness of sympatric camellias across populations (pink p female; cyan p male). The dashed line indicates an experimentally estimated line on which half of weevil boreholes are expected to reach seeds (Toju and Sota 2006b). At the right side of this line, camellias can defend against weevils attacks with a probability of more than 50% (Toju and Sota 2006b). J, Regression of weevil ovipositor length (SD) against the pericarp thickness of sympatric camellias. K, Latitudinal gradient of armament escalation in weevils. Each female (pink) and male (cyan) weevil snout length (SD) was regressed against latitude. L, Latitudinal gradient of weevil ovipositor length (SD). M, Latitudinal gradient of armament escalation in camellias. Pericarp thickness was regressed against latitude (red p populations with weevils; blue p populations without weevils). N, Geographic variation in the fruit center radius of camellias (red p populations with weevils; blue p populations without weevils). lations is restricted at very small spatial scales in both species (e.g., !10 km; Ueno et al. 2000; Toju et al. 2011; see also Toju and Sota 2006c, 2009), each population can evolve in response to local coevolutionary selection. No- tably, the level of the camellia defensive armament is higher in lower-latitudinal and lower-altitudinal regions (Toju and Sota 2006b; Toju 2008). This observation illuminates the possibility that some kinds of climatic factors play important roles in the geographic differentiation of the weevil-camellia evolutionary interactions. Geographic Variation in Weevil Snout and Ovipositor Length To explicitly examine the morphological adaptation of weevils to sympatric camellia fruit morphology, we studied geographic variation in the sexual dimorphism of snout length (g. 1A, 1F) among populations throughout Japan (g. 1H; table A1 in the online edition of the American Naturalist). Morphological measurements were conducted using the software ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) on digital images taken with an S8APO/EC3 stereomicro- scope (Leica Microsystems). After measuring snout length (g. 1F), female abdomens were dissected to determine ovipositor length. Although the ovipositor of the camellia weevil is as long as the snout (g. 1G), the total length of the ovipositor is difcult to measure because it is soft and retractable. Therefore, the length of the chitinous fragment supporting the distal half of the ovipositor (coxite; g. 1G; Donaldson 1992) was measured. In each population, up to 10 randomly chosen individuals for each sex were mea- sured. The sex-dependent evolutionary effects of the Jap- anese camellia on weevil snout length were tested by an ANOVA model of snout length, including the factors of sex, pericarp thickness of sympatric camellias (table A2 in the online edition of the American Naturalist; see below), and their interaction effects. Weevil snout length was also regressed against camellia pericarp thickness across pop- ulations in both sexes to test whether the evolutionary response of weevil snout length to local camellia pericarp thickness differed according to sex. Because female ca- mellia weevils deposit eggs into camellia seeds, both snout length and ovipositor length should evolve through in- teractions with the Japanese camellia. The local adaptation of ovipositors was tested by regressing ovipositor length against camellia pericarp thickness across populations. The statistical software R, version 2.9.1 (available at http:// www.r-project.org/), was used for statistical analyses. Camellia Fruit Morphology To determine whether the thickened camellia pericarp has evolved as a defense against the camellia weevil, we next compared fruit morphology among islands with or with- out camellia weevils (g. 1H). From 2002 to 2007, fruits of the Japanese camellia were collected from 49 popula- tions throughout the Japanese archipelago shortly after the oviposition season of the camellia weevil (table A2; g. 1H). The sampled area included islands on which the ca- mellia weevil has not been reported (Fujimoto 2004). This weevil is estimated to be absent from these islands because it usually imposes severe predation pressure on camellia seeds (Saito and Suzuki 1982; Toju and Sota 2006b), and hence the weevil would have been reported as an agri- cultural pest if it were present on the islands. To conrm the presence or absence of the camellia weevil within each camellia population, the number of boreholes was counted on each fruit (g. 1D). The camellia weevil was considered to be absent from populations with no boreholes on fruits (table A2). The diameter and pericarp thickness of col- lected fruits were measured as described elsewhere (Toju and Sota 2006b). In addition, to compare the resources allocated to pericarps (i.e., defense) with those allocated to seeds (i.e., reproduction), the radius of fruit center (g. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 566 The American Naturalist 1C; hereafter, fruit center radius) was calculated. To ex- amine the evolutionary impact of the weevil on camellia fruit morphology, geographic variation in pericarp thick- ness or in fruit center radius was explained in an ANOVA model, which included the effects of the presence/absence of the weevil and sampling location (latitude and longi- tude) and their interactions. Heritable Variation in Camellia Pericarp Thickness The heritability of pericarp thickness was estimated based on genotyping using microsatellite markers (Ritland 2000). For this analysis, we chose a camellia population in Ka- wahara, Yakushima Island (YKI; g. 1H; table A2), which exhibited the large phenotypic variation commonly ob- served in populations on this island. Camellia fruits and leaves were sampled from 76 trees within a 50-m radius, and pericarp thickness was measured. Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves and genotyping was performed using 29 microsatellite markers (table A3 in the online edition of the American Naturalist). DNA extraction and geno- typing procedures are detailed elsewhere (Ueno and Tsu- mura 2009). Based on the microsatellite genotypes, intertree pairwise relatedness was inferred using the program Mark, version 3.1 (Ritland 2006). Heritability estimates were obtained from a regression of intertree trait similarity against pair- wise relatedness using the Mark program. The phenotypic similarity of pericarp thickness P for two trees i and j was represented by (P U)(P U) i j Z p , (1) ij V where U and V are the mean and variance of P in the population, respectively. Assuming that phenotypic simi- larity is determined by the sharing of both genes and en- vironments, it is expressed as 2 Z p2r h r e , (2) ij ij e ij where r ij is the relatedness coefcient, h 2 is heritability, r e is the correlation due to shared environment (assumed constant for all tree pairs), and e ij is random error. Note that the Mark program can incorporate the effects of distance-related similarity/dissimilarity of environmental conditions by adding the term b e d ij , where b e is the co- efcient of linear decrease of environmental correlation between two individuals separated by the distance d ij (Rit- land 2006). However, our preliminary analysis showed that the b e coefcient was nonsignicant; hence, the term b e d ij was not considered. For each of the four relatedness estimators (Queller and Goodnight 1989; Ritland 1996; Lynch and Ritland 1999; Wang 2002), heritability was estimated as Cov (r , Z ) ij ij 2 h p , (3) 2 Var (r ) ij where is the covariance between relatedness Cov (r , Z ) ij ij and phenotypic similarity, and is the actual vari- Var (r ) ij ance of relatedness, whose calculation is detailed elsewhere (Ritland 2000). Climatic Gradient Our previous study (Toju and Sota 2006b) showed that features of the weevil-camellia evolutionary interaction varied gradually along latitude across the Japanese islands. Since climatic environments are expected to vary along latitude, we rst analyzed the latitudinal gradient of of- fensive (i.e., weevil snout and ovipositor length) and de- fensive (camellia pericarp thickness) armament by regress- ing each trait size on latitude across populations. In addition, to elucidate how investment to seeds differs among camellia populations, fruit center radius was re- gressed against latitude as well. To examine how resource allocation to the pericarp de- pended on local climate, we focused on geographic vari- ation in annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and annual mean solar radiation (meteorological data from the Japan Meteorological Agency 2002). Across pop- ulations, a regression of pericarp thickness on each climatic variable was conducted. We predicted that pericarp thick- ness would show gradients along the climatic variables across camellia populations with weevils if resource allo- cation to defense was affected by local climatic environ- ments. In contrast, across populations without weevils, the trait was expected to show little geographic variation. To test this potential difference in resource allocation to de- fense between populations with and without weevils, we analyzed an ANOVA model that included the interaction terms of climatic variables and the existence of weevils. In addition to the climatic gradient of the camellia defensive trait, we analyzed the gradient of the weevil- camellia evolutionary/ecological interactions. First, we predicted that balance between weevil and camellia ar- mament, which could determine the nature of local eco- logical interactions (Toju and Sota 2006b; Toju 2009), would vary along the cline of climatic conditions. The differential effects of climatic environment on weevil and camellia armament size were examined in an ANOVA, in which species identity (weevil or camellia) and three cli- matic variables and their interaction terms were incor- porated as explanatory variables. For weevils, published data of female snout length in 21 populations (Toju and This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Climatic Gradients of Coevolution 567 Table 1: Analysis of geographic variation in camellia fruit morphology Variable df F P Pericarp thickness: Weevil a 1 29.3 !.0001 Latitude a 1 92.9 !.0001 Longitude 1 .1 .7540 Weevil # latitude a 1 4.6 .0386 Weevil # longitude 1 .4 .5358 Fruit center radius: Weevil a 1 4.4 .0410 Latitude a 1 4.6 .0377 Longitude a 1 7.4 .0093 Weevil # latitude 1 .7 .3950 Weevil # longitude 1 .9 .3384 Note: In an ANOVA model, geographic variation in pericarp thickness was explained by the presence/absence of the camellia weevil (weevil effect), latitude, longitude, and the interaction terms of the weevil effect and geographic locations (top). Con- comitantly, geographic variation in fruit center radius, which rep- resented the amount of resources allocated to seeds, was explained by the explanatory variables in another ANOVA model (bottom). The data of 49 camellia populations (32 populations with weevils and 17 populations without weevils) were analyzed. a Coefcient included in a stepwise-selected model based on Akaikes Information Criterion. Sota 2006a, 2006b; Toju 2008) with additional snout length data in 14 populations were subjected to the ANOVA(table A4 in the online edition of the American Naturalist). For camellias, the data of 32 populations with the camellia weevil were used. Second, contribution of climatic envi- ronment to local weevil-camellia ecological interactions was inferred. Two response variables were prepared. The one is the proportion of successful weevil boreholes (i.e., the proportion of the number of holes reaching seeds to the total number of holes analyzed; g. 1D), and the other is the proportion of mature seeds infested by camellia weevil larvae (i.e., the ratio of the number of infested seeds to the total number of seeds analyzed). For each fruit collected in each population, the number of boreholes made by weevils (g. 1D) and that of boreholes reaching seeds were counted. Likewise, the number of intact/in- fested mature seeds was counted as well. In total, 26,354 boreholes, of which 11,199 reached the seeds, and 8,820 mature seeds, of which 1,764 seeds were infested (28 pop- ulations with weevils; table A2), were subjected to multiple regression analyses, in which effects of three climatic var- iables were examined (generalized linear models with bi- nomial error and logit-link functions). Third, association between each climatic variable and each evolutionary/eco- logical variable was graphically presented on the basis of a series of univariate regressions. Results Geographic Variation in Weevil Snout and Ovipositor Length When weevils were collected within an area in which the camellia population featured very thick pericarps, the snouts of female weevils were 3.1-fold longer than those of males (g. 1I). In contrast, weevil sexual dimorphism was only moderate when collected from areas dominated by camellias with thin pericarps (g. 1I). Although both female and male snout lengths were correlated with ca- mellia pericarp thickness across 11 populations (female: , , snout p0.623 #pericarp 5.81 F p139.3 P ! 1, 9 ; male: , , .0001 snout p0.049 #pericarp 5.39 F p7.4 1, 9 ), the regression slopes were steeper in females P ! .0239 than in males ( , ). Moreover, ovi- F p105.6 P ! .0001 1, 18 positor length (g. 1G) increased signicantly with in- creasing camellia pericarp thickness across populations ( , , ovipositor p0.146 #pericarp 4.85 F p73.8 P ! 1, 9 ; g. 1J). .0001 Camellia Fruit Morphology in Populations with or without Weevils A morphological analysis of camellias indicated that mean pericarp thickness across populations with weevils was 10.34 mm ( mm), while that across populations SD p5.31 without weevils was 6.25 mm ( mm). An SD p1.13 ANOVA showed that camellia populations exposed to wee- vils showed signicant increases in pericarp thickness com- pared with populations from which weevils were absent (table 1). The analysis also indicated signicant effects of latitude and the interaction between latitude and the pres- ence/absence of camellia weevils (table 1; see below for detailed discussion). In contrast, mean fruit center radius across camellia populations with weevils was 10.95 mm ( mm), smaller than that across populations SD p1.34 without weevils ( mm, mm). mean p11.62 SD p0.71 The effect of the presence/absence of weevils on fruit cen- ter radius was signicant but weak (table 1). Heritable Variation in Camellia Pericarp Thickness A genetic analysis using 29 microsatellite markers among a population of 76 camellia plants demonstrated that peri- carp thickness was heritable (table 2). Heritability esti- mates ranged from 0.63 to 0.82 ( ), depending mean p0.74 on relatedness estimators (table 2). This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 568 The American Naturalist Table 2: Heritability estimates of camellia pericarp thickness based on genetic analysis using 29 microsatellite markers h 2 r e Relatedness estimator Estimate SE P Estimate SE P Queller and Goodnight 1989 .80 .52 .0324 .014 .008 .0570 Ritland 1996 .82 .61 .0432 .013 .057 .0242 Lynch and Ritland 1999 .70 .55 .0449 .009 .008 .0530 Wang 2002 .63 .45 .0501 .011 .006 .0016 Note:: Heritability (h 2 ) and the coefcient of shared environment (r e ) were estimated based on each of four relatedness estimators. The reliability of the estimates was evaluated by the bootstrap sampling of tree pairs (10,000 replicates). Table 3: Effects of climatic environment on weevil/camellia ar- mament size Variable df F P Camellia populations with weevils vs. populations without weevils: Weevil a 1 25.5 !.0001 Temperature a 1 54.7 !.0001 Precipitation a 1 13.9 .0006 Solar radiation 1 .4 .5368 Weevil # temperature 1 4.9 .0331 Weevil # precipitation a 1 7.3 .0100 Weevil # solar radiation 1 .4 .5137 Weevil populations vs. camellia popu- lations with weevils: Species a 1 5.1 .0277 Temperature a 1 60.8 !.0001 Precipitation a 1 34.6 !.0001 Solar radiation 1 .3 .5704 Species # temperature a 1 6.2 .0155 Species # precipitation 1 .2 .6767 Species # solar radiation 1 .1 .7881 Note: In an ANOVA model, geographic variation in pericarp thickness was explained by the presence/absence of the camellia weevil (weevil effect), three climate variables, and the interaction effects of the weevil effect and respective climatic variables (top). The data of 49 camellia populations (32 populations with weevils and 17 populations without weevils) were analyzed. In addition, differential effects of climatic environment on weevil/camellia armament size were examined in another ANOVA model, in which species identity (species effect), three climatic variables, and the interaction effects of the species effect and respective climatic variables were incorporated as explanatory variables (bottom). The data of 32 camellia and 35 weevil pop- ulations were subjected to the analysis. a Coefcient included in a stepwise-selected model based on Akaikes In- formation Criterion. Climatic Gradient of the Arms Race Regression analyses revealed that the snout length of female weevils increased at lower latitudes (snout p , , ), whereas 1.23 #latitude 52.9 F p17.5 P p.0024 1, 9 male snout length did not ( - snout p0.086 #lati , , ; g. 1K). Ovipositor tude 8.76 F p3.0 P p.12 1, 9 length also exhibited a latitudinal gradient (oviposi- , , ; tor p0.290 #latitude 16.0 F p16.0 P p.0031 1, 9 g. 1L). Likewise, in camellias, pericarp thickness increased at lower latitudes (populations with weevils; pericarp p , , ; popula- 1.87 #latitude 72.2 F p67.2 P ! .0001 1, 30 tions without weevils, pericarp p0.70 #latitude , , ; g. 1M). Notably, at higher 29.5 F p13.8 P p.0021 1, 15 latitudes, pericarp thickness was comparable between populations with and without the camellia weevil, whereas it diverged considerably at lower latitudes (sig- nicant weevil # latitude effect in table 1; g. 1M). In contrast, only marginally signicant association between fruit radius center and latitude was observed (populations with weevils; fruit center radius p0.22 #latitude , , ; populations without weevils, 18.3 F p5.3 P p.0279 1, 30 , , fruit center radius p0.33 #latitude 0.62 F p5.7 1, 30 [these regressions are nonsignicant at P p.0311 a p after Bonferroni correction]; g. 1N; table 1). 0.05 Across populations with weevils, pericarp thickness sig- nicantly increased with increasing annual mean temper- ature, while across populations without weevils, this pat- tern was nonsignicant (g. 2A). Pericarp thickness also increased with increasing annual precipitation across pop- ulations with weevils, although it decreased with increasing precipitation across populations without weevils (g. 2B). An ANOVA revealed that the gradients along precipitation were signicantly different between populations with and without weevils (table 3). In contrast to the two climatic variables, annual mean solar radiation did not signicantly explain geographic variation in pericarp thickness among camellia populations with weevils (g. 2C; table 3). The snout length of female camellia weevils signicantly increased with increasing annual mean temperature, but the slope of the gradient was signicantly shallower than that of camellia populations with weevils (g. 2D; see spe- cies # temperature interaction in table 3). Thus, balance between weevil and camellia armament varied along the climatic gradient. Although female snout length signi- cantly increased with increasing annual precipitation too, the trait was not correlated with annual mean solar ra- diation (g. 2E, 2F; table 3). Our analysis also showed that the ecological interaction This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Figure 2: Dependence of the weevil-camellia coevolutionary process on climatic conditions. AC, Relationship between camellia pericarp thickness and each climatic variable (A, annual mean temperature; B, annual precipitation; C, annual mean solar radiation). The red lines represent signicant regression ( ) across camellia populations with weevils, and the blue lines indicate regression across populations P ! .01 without weevils (see table 3 for the result of a multivariate model). DF, Relationship between the snout length of female weevils and each climatic variable. In each panel, the regression of weevil snouts (triangles) is shown with that of camellia pericarps (circles; populations with weevils). GI, Relationship between the percentage of the successful excavations of camellia pericarps by weevils and each climatic variable. See table 4 for the result of a multivariate model. JL, Relationship between the proportion of seeds infested by weevil larvae and each climatic variable. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 570 The American Naturalist Table 4: Effects of local climatic conditions on the weevil-camellia interaction Proportion of successful excavations a Proportion of infested seeds b Variable Coefcient z P Coefcient z P Temperature .485 (.023) 21.5 !.0001 c .368 (.047) 7.8 !.0001 c Precipitation .270 (.019) 14.3 !.0001 c .027 (.041) .7 .513 Solar radiation .177 (.018) 9.6 !.0001 c .056 (.035) 1.6 .106 c Note: The proportion of successful excavations or the proportion of infested seeds was regressed on three climatic variables (multivariate regressions). All climatic variables were z-standardized before regression. In each regression, a generalized linear model with binomial error and a logit-link function was constructed. a In total, the data of 26,354 boreholes, of which 11,199 reached the seeds, were collected from 28 populations and subjected to the analysis. b In total, the data of 8,820 seeds, of which 1,764 were infested, were collected from 28 populations and subjected to the analysis. c Coefcients included in stepwise-selected models based on Akaikes Information Criterion. between weevils and camellias varied along the gradient of climatic conditions. The percentage of the successful excavation of the camellia pericarp by weevils decreased from 90% to 20% as annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and annual mean solar radiation increased (g. 2G2I; see g. A1 in the online edition of the American Naturalist for a regression by latitude). A multivariate re- gression revealed that effects of all three climatic variables were signicant and that annual mean temperature had the largest effect among the variables (table 4). The in- festation ratio of camellia seeds by weevil larvae also de- creased with increasing annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, and annual mean solar radiation (g. 2J2L; g. A1). However, only the effect of annual mean tem- perature was signicant in a multivariate regression model (table 4). Discussion Our results showed that the level of resource allocation to the heritable defensive traits of preys/hosts was related to local climate and that such environmental dependence of prey/host evolutionary processes could promote the geo- graphic differentiation of coevolutionary arms races with their predators/parasites. Moreover, analyses of climatic gradients also showed that the climatic dependence of co- evolutionary processes could organize geographic varia- tion in the success of predator/parasite attacks or preda- tion/parasitization intensity, further structuring the geographic mosaics (or clines) of evolutionary and eco- logical interactions between species. These ndings shed light on the potential effects of climatic change on coevo- lutionary interactions in nature, providing the viewpoint of spatiotemporally dynamic processes of interspecic in- teractions. In the following discussion, we examine how coevolving traits and evolutionary/ecological processes vary along climatic gradients and consider how coevolu- tionary processes respond to climate change, by inferring the history of the weevil-camellia interaction during past glacial/postglacial periods. Climatic Gradients of Arms Race Coevolution We found that the extent of the weevil-camellia arms race differed signicantly along a latitudinal gradient of climatic environments (g. 1K1M). Given that climatic conditions can strongly affect the photosynthetic activity of the Jap- anese camellia (e.g., higher photosynthetic rate at higher temperature; Miyazawa and Kikuzawa 2006; Y. Miyazawa and H. Toju, unpublished data), the resource availability of the plant is a potential key factor of the geographically structured coevolutionary interactions. There are some hy- potheses explaining this productivity gradient. For ex- ample, when a prey species is resource limited, the trade- off between defensive trait size and the maintenance/ production of vegetative and reproductive parts can limit investment to defense; in contrast, if the prey species can gain access to sufcient resources, evolutionary escalation of prey defense and the counterevolution of predator of- fense can occur (Sasaki and Godfray 1999). Therefore, the climate-dependent investment to the pericarp (g. 2A, 2B) likely represents an environment-dependent defense strat- egy by camellias, which regulates the extent of coevolu- tionary armament escalation. Interestingly, in populations under relatively cool and arid climate, camellias invest- ment in pericarps was low irrespective of the presence/ absence of the camellia weevil (g. 2A, 2B). This result suggests that these camellia populations show the de- fenseless phenotype that probably represents the mini- mum thickness of pericarps required for buffering physical environmental stresses such as frost damage. In contrast, in populations under a warm, humid climate, investment in pericarps diverged considerably among populations with weevils (g. 2A). In the populations, camellias have This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Climatic Gradients of Coevolution 571 likely been selected to invest resources in defense, thereby triggering the coevolutionary arms race with weevils. Con- sequently, the remarkable diversity of the weevil-camellia evolutionary interactions within a narrow range of inter- mediate temperatures (g. 2A, 2D) may be attributed to the existence of the threshold climatic condition that bi- furcates the defenseless and escalation strategies by camellias. Alternatively, favorable climatic conditions may allow the high population growth rate of the plant, which in turn causes the rapid growth of weevil populations and results in transiently severe seed infestation by weevils (cf. Brockhurst et al. 2003). Such climate-dependent strength of seed predation would determine the strength of natural selection on the camellia defensive trait, thereby generating geographic variation in the extent of the weevil-camellia arms race (see Hochberg and van Baalen 1998 for theo- retical discussion). Note that the severity of seed infesta- tion decreased in the populations exhibiting higher tem- peratures (g. 2J; table 4) and that this result seemingly does not support this second hypothesis. Extensive the- oretical studies that incorporate essential characteristics of the weevil-camellia system will help to further test the alternative hypotheses. Ecological Consequences of Escalatory Coevolution Our results further suggest that the climate dependence of coevolutionary dynamics controls the ecological pro- cesses of interacting species, as evidenced by the fact that the average success of weevil boring decreased sharply with increased temperature, precipitation, and quantity of solar radiation (g. 2G2H). Although snout and ovipositor length in female weevils have counterevolved in response to camellia pericarp thickness (g. 1I, 1J), the balance between predator weapon and prey armament changes as the arms race proceeds (Toju and Sota 2006b; g. 2D). Because long weevil snouts can incur mortality costs (Menu 1993) and ovipositor length is constrained by total body size, which is in turn limited by larval food sources (i.e., camellia seed size), having longer snouts would be- come increasingly costly. The resultant shift in the balance between weevil weapon and camellia armament (g. 2D; cf. Hanin et al. 2008) would decrease the mean success rate of weevil attacks (g. 2G). As we observed, the severity of seed infestation by weevil larvae decreased along the climatic gradient (g. 2J), suggesting that a decrease in the reproductive success of individual females (g. 2G) may have resulted in lower population densities of the camellia weevil. Theory predicts that such escalatory coevolution likely entails the alternation of interspecic ecological interac- tions, which in turn can inuence natural selection pro- cesses (Thompson 1999; Nuismer and Thompson 2006). In particular, the emergence of highly defended hosts through coevolution can promote the shifts of parasites to less defended host species, thereby establishing new eco- logical and evolutionary interactions. This theory of co- evolutionary alternation (Thompson 1999; Nuismer and Thompson 2006) deserves extensive future studies that simultaneously investigate the geographically divergent processes of escalatory coevolution and the host-shift dy- namics of interacting species. Climatic Change and Coevolutionary Processes The observed climatic dependence of the arms race process leads to the proposition that climate change has played essential roles in the (co-)evolutionary history of weevil and camellia species. For example, change in air temper- ature during the last glacial-interglacial cycle could have greatly contributed to the geographic structuring of the weevil-camellia coevolutionary interactions. Paleoclimatic and phylogeographic studies suggested that the Japanese camellia and the camellia weevil were restricted to a few narrow refugia in the southern part of Japan during the last glacial period and that the two species were under a cool climate during the period (Hoshiai and Kobayashi 1957; Tsukada 1983, 1985; Toju and Sota 2006c; g. 1H). A population genetic analysis of the camellia weevil further inferred that the camellia weevil was restricted to a narrow range in southern Kyushu during the glacial period and that populations of the species rapidly diverged after the last glacial maximum (approximately 18,000 years ago; Toju and Sota 2009; g. 1H). Given the environmental dependence of the weevil-camellia evolutionary interac- tion (g. 2), it is presumable that weevils and camellias had not evolved exaggerated armaments during the last glacial period. As global climate changed after the glacial age, the camellias that remained in the south likely ex- perienced an increase in air temperature and initiated the arms race coevolution with weevils. In contrast, the ca- mellia populations expanding their range toward the north have not experienced an increase in temperature and may have retained the ancestral state of the evolutionary/eco- logical interactions with weevils. This putative spatiotem- poral process of the weevil-camellia interaction implies that dynamics of interspecic interactions can change con- siderably in the wild, depending on the spatial variation or temporal change of climatic environments. Overall, this study demonstrates that coevolutionary dy- namics and subsequent ecological interactions between species can shift markedly within relatively narrowclimatic ranges (g. 2). Such climatic gradients of the evolutionary and ecological processes of interacting species are poten- tially important in broad types of natural communities This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 572 The American Naturalist (Bertness et al. 1981; Sanford et al. 2003; Pennings et al. 2009; see also Andrew and Hoghes 2005), though the im- portance of (co-)evolutionary dynamics in this context has not been thoroughly tested in most interspecic interac- tions. Considering that by the end of this century air tem- perature is expected to increase by 1.1 to 6.4C compared with the range observed between 1980 and 1999 (Solomon et al. 2007), global warming may greatly alter the evolu- tionary and ecological processes of interspecic interac- tions. Consequently, to understand the impacts of climate change on natural communities, not only the ecological processes of single species but the coevolutionary dynamics of interacting species must be considered. Acknowledgments We thank Y. Komatsu and Y. Tsumura for supporting mo- lecular experiments and L. Kawaguchi for providing a pho- tograph of a camellia fruit. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This study is partly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Fellowship for Young Researchers: 1702263). Literature Cited Andrew, N. R., and L. Hughes. 2005. Herbivore damage along a latitudinal gradient: relative impacts of different feeding guilds. Oikos 108:176182. Benkman, C. W. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevo- lution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S75S91. Benkman, C. W., T. L. Parchman, and A. M. Siepielski. 2007. The geographic mosaic of coevolution and its conservation. Pages 225 238 in S. P. Carroll and C. W. Fox, eds. Conservation biology: evolution in action. Oxford University Press, New York. Berenbaum, M. R., and A. R. Zangerl. 2006. Parsnip webworms and host plants at home and abroad: trophic complexity in a geo- graphic mosaic. Ecology 87:30703081. Bertness, M. D., S. D. Garrity, and S. C. Levings. 1981. Predation pressure and gastropod foraging: a tropical-temperate comparison. Evolution 35:9951007. Brockhurst, M. A., A. D. Morgan, P. B. Rainey, and A. Buckling. 2003. Population mixing accelerates coevolution. Ecology Letters 6:975979. Brodie, E. D., Jr., B. J. Ridenhour, and E. D. Brodie III. 2002. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:20672082. Brooks, D. R., and E. P. Hoberg. 2007. How will global climate change affect parasite-host assemblages? Trends in Parasitology 23:571 574. Carroll, S. P., J. E. Loye, H. Dingle, M. Mathieson, T. R. Famula, and M. P. Zalucki. 2005. And the beak shall inherit: evolution in re- sponse to invasion. Ecology Letters 8:944951. Carroll, S. P., A. P. Hendry, D. N. Reznick, and C. W. Fox. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Functional Ecology 21:387 393. Donaldson, J. S. 1992. Adaptation for oviposition into concealed cycad ovules in the cycad weevils Antliarhinus zamiae and A. sig- natus (Goleoptera: Gurculionoidea). Biological Journal of the Lin- nean Society 47:2335. Durant, J. M., D. Hjermann, G. Ottersen, and N. Stenseth. 2007. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator require- ments and resource availability. Climate Research 33:271283. Forde, S. E., J. N. Thompson, and B. J. M. Bohannan. 2004. Ad- aptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host- parasitoid interaction. Nature 431:841844. Fujimoto, H. 2004. The list of Japanese Curculioninae. Newsletter of the Japanese Weevil Information Network 3:26. [In Japanese.] Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30- year study of Darwins nches. Science 296:707711. Hairston, N. G., S. P. Ellner, M. A. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. A. Fox. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evo- lutionary time. Ecology Letters 8:11141127. Hanin, C. T., E. D. Brodie Jr., and E. D. Brodie III. 2008. Phenotypic mismatches reveal escape from arms-race coevolution. PLoS Bi- ology 6:e60. Hegland, S. J., A. Nielsen, A. Lazaro, A. L. Bjerknes, and O. Totland. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interac- tions? Ecology Letters 12:184195. Hochberg, M. E., and M. van Baalen. 1998. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. American Naturalist 152:620634. Hoshiai, M., and K. Kobayashi. 1957. A theoretical discussion on the so-called snow line, with reference to the temperature reduction during the last glacial age in Japan. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 28:6175. Japan Meteorological Agency. 2002. Mesh climate data of Japan 2000. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center, Tokyo. Kinnison, M. T., and A. P. Hendry. 2001. The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112:145164. Lopez-Pascua, L. D. C., M. A. Brockhurst, and A. Buckling. 2010. Antagonistic coevolution across productivity gradients: an exper- imental test of the effects of dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:207211. Lynch, M., and K. Ritland. 1999. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:17531766. Menu, F. 1993. Strategies of emergence in the chestnut weevil Cur- culio elephas (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Oecologia (Berlin) 96: 383390. Miyazawa, Y., and K. Kikuzawa. 2006. Physiological basis of seasonal trend in leaf photosynthesis of ve evergreen broad-leaved species in a temperate deciduous forest. Tree Physiology 26:249256. Nuismer, S. L., and J. N. Thompson. 2006. Coevolutionary alter- nation in antagonistic interactions. Evolution 60:22072217. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Sys- tematics 37:637669. Pennings, S. C., C. K. Ho, C. S. Salgado, K. Wieski, N. Dav, A. E. Kunza, and E. L. Watson. 2009. Latitudinal variation in herbivore pressure in Atlantic Coast salt marshes. Ecology 90:183195. Queller, D. C., and K. F. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258275. Ritland, K. 1996. A marker-based method for inferences about quan- This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Climatic Gradients of Coevolution 573 titative inheritance in natural populations. Evolution 50:1062 1073. . 2000. Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Molecular Ecology 9:11951204. . 2006. Mark: genetic marker analysis program. University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Saito, T., and M. Suzuki. 1982. Life history of Curculio camelliae Roelofs (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and its susceptibility to Me- tarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria tenella. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26:232236. [In Japanese.] Sanford, E., M. S. Roth, G. C. Johns, J. P. Wares, and G. N. Somero. 2003. Local selection and latitudinal variation in a marine pred- ator-prey interaction. Science 300:11351137. Sasaki, A., and H. C. J. Godfray. 1999. A model for the coevolution of resistance and virulence in coupled host-parasitoid interactions. Proceeding of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:455 463. Siepielski, A. M., and C. W. Benkman. 2004. Interactions among moths, crossbills, squirrels, and lodgepole pine in a geographic selection mosaic. Evolution 58:95101. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller, eds. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the In- tergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. terHorst, C. P., T. E. Miller, and D. R. Levitan. 2010. Evolution of prey in ecological time reduces the effect size of predators in ex- perimental microcosms. Ecology 91:629636. Thompson, J. N. 1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:329332. . 1999. Specic hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of co- evolution. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S1S14. . 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. . 2009. The coevolving web of life. American Naturalist 173: 125140. Thompson, J. N., and C. C. Fernandez. 2006. Temporal dynamics of antagonism and mutualism in a geographically variable plant- insect interaction. Ecology 87:103112. Toju, H. 2007. Interpopulation variation in predator foraging be- haviour promotes the evolutionary divergence of prey. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:15441553. . 2008. Fine-scale local adaptation of weevil mouthpart length and camellia pericarp thickness: altitudinal gradient of a putative arms race. Evolution 65:10861102. . 2009. Natural selection drives the ne-scale divergence of a coevolutionary arms race involving a long-mouthed weevil and its obligate host plant. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9:273. Toju, H., and T. Sota. 2006a. Adaptive divergence of scaling rela- tionships mediates the arms race between a weevil and its host plant. Biology Letters 2:539542. . 2006b. Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geo- graphic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. Amer- ican Naturalist 167:105117. . 2006c. Phylogeography and the geographic cline in the ar- mament of a seed-predatory weevil: effects of historical events vs. natural selection from the host plant. Molecular Ecology 15:4161 4173. . 2009. Do arms races punctuate evolutionary stasis? unied insights from phylogeny, phylogeography and microevolutionary processes. Molecular Ecology 18:39403954. Toju, H., S. Ueno, F. Taniguchi, and T. Sota. 2011. Metapopulation structure of a seed-predator weevil and its host plant in arms race coevolution. Evolution (forthcoming). Tsukada, M. 1983. Vegetation and climate during the last glacial maximum in Japan. Quaternary Research 19:212235. . 1985. Map of vegetation during the last glacial maximum in Japan. Quaternary Research 23:369381. Tylianakis, J. M., R. K. Didham, J. Bascompte, and D. A. Wardle. 2008. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosys- tems. Ecology Letters 11:13511363. Ueno, S., and Y. Tsumura. 2009. Development of microsatellite and amplicon length polymorphism markers for Camellia japonica L. from tea plant (Camellia sinensis) expressed sequence tags. Mo- lecular Ecology Resources 9:814816. Ueno, S., N. Tomaru, H. Yoshimaru, T. Manabe, and S. Yamamoto. 2000. Genetic structure of Camellia japonica L. in an old-growth evergreen forest, Tsushima, Japan. Molecular Ecology 9:647656. van Asch, M., and M. E. Visser. 2006. Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony. Annual Review of Entomology 52:3755. Wang, J. 2002. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160:12031215. Whitham, T. G., J. K. Bailey, J. A. Schweitzer, S. M. Shuster, R. K. Bangert, C. J. Leroy, E. Lonsdorf, et al. 2006. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics 7:510523. Yoshida, T., L. E. Jones, S. P. Ellner, G. F. Fussmann, and N. G. Hairston. 2003. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424:303306. Zangerl, A. R., and M. R. Berenbaum. 2003. Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution 57:806815. Associate Editor: Kathleen Donohue Editor: Mark A. McPeek This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.72.230 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:14:41 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions