Between October 21-24, 2014, a seminar on painting in Venetian Crete was held at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. The seminar introduced religious icon production in Venetian-occupied Crete from the 13th century until the 16th century work of El Greco. Crete became an important center for religious icon painting under Venetian rule due to influences from both the Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic traditions. A key figure was the 15th century painter Angelos Akotantos, who worked in Candia (Heraklion) and was an important intellectual and citizen of his time.
Original Description:
Small validation work about the icon painting in Venetian occupied Crete in 15th century
Original Title
Painting in Venetian Crete - From Byzantium to El Greco
Between October 21-24, 2014, a seminar on painting in Venetian Crete was held at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. The seminar introduced religious icon production in Venetian-occupied Crete from the 13th century until the 16th century work of El Greco. Crete became an important center for religious icon painting under Venetian rule due to influences from both the Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic traditions. A key figure was the 15th century painter Angelos Akotantos, who worked in Candia (Heraklion) and was an important intellectual and citizen of his time.
Between October 21-24, 2014, a seminar on painting in Venetian Crete was held at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. The seminar introduced religious icon production in Venetian-occupied Crete from the 13th century until the 16th century work of El Greco. Crete became an important center for religious icon painting under Venetian rule due to influences from both the Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic traditions. A key figure was the 15th century painter Angelos Akotantos, who worked in Candia (Heraklion) and was an important intellectual and citizen of his time.
By }oaquin }aviei Esteban Naitinez Nay 2u14 PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
1 8$%+.937%#.$ Between the past 21 st anu 24 th 0ctobei 2u1S the seminaiy "Painting in venetian Ciete: fiom Byzantium to El uieco" was helu at the 0niveisity of FiibouigSwitzeilanu, by the piofessoi Naiia vassilaki. This seminaiy intiouuceu the ieligious icon piouuction in the venetian occupieu Ciete, fiom the beginning of the 1S iu centuiy, until the time of Bomenikos Theotokopoulos, !" $%&'(, in the 16 th centuiy. Aftei the establishment in the islanu of the venetians in 121u we obseiveu a veiy iich anu famous piouuction of ieligious icons, with both 0iiental anu 0cciuental influences. We leaineu about the constiuction of chuiches anu about some icon painteis, whose woik is well attesteu by the official uocuments holu by the buieauciacy of )* +&%&,-..-/*. The main question is: Why uiu Ciete become such an impoitant piouuction centie of ieligious icon painting. The stiuctuie of this shoit valiuation woik follows that of oui seminaiy, whose thiee main axes weie: 1 Bistoiical backgiounu, 2 Religious icon painting in venetian Ciete, anu S The figuie anu the woik of 0,1&"(. 02(3*,3(.. With a necessaiy histoiical backgiounu we leaineu about the special situation of the big Neuiteiianean islanu uuiing the time of the venetian leaueiship, especially at the 1S th centuiy. Afteiwaius we analyseu the icon piouuction in venetian Ciete, focusing piecisely on that centuiy. Finally, we leaint about some Cietan authois, but mainly about the figuie of 0,1&"(. 02(3*,3(., the most impoitant paintei of his time, whose woik is well known by oui seminaiy's teachei aftei long-time scientific ieseaich. The seminaiy incluueu also a veiy illustiative visit to the 45.&5/ (6 0%3 *,7 8-.3(%9 (6 $&,&:*, wheie a iich collection of Cietan icons is uisplayeu. :; <#=%.+#7"5 >"7?&+.3$9 The ;9<*,3-,& !/=-%&, aftei the Latin conquest in the eaily 1S th centuiy onwaius, languisheu in a long anu slow uecauence. Since the late 14 th centuiy most of his possessions began to shiink to the point of uisappeaiance. Thus, as much of the hinteilanu was alieauy in the hanus of the >33(/*,., the no-longei-existent empiie was ill to ueau, with shaip social anu economical uivisions. Its capital, ?(,.3*,3-,(="&, PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
2 was like an islanu in a hostile sea, uiiectly thieateu by the 0ttoman piesence. The economy was piimaiily baseu on tiaue, anu thus highly influenceu by the two maiitime poweis of the time, @&,-'& anu $&,(*; they contiolleu the seas anu the communications system, anu helu a viitual monopoly of long-uistance tiaue. Alieauy on 12u4, the same yeai the Fouith Ciusaue has conqueieu Constantinople, the foimei byzantine AB&/& oi C%(:-,'& (6 ?%&3& was fiistly offeieu by the ciusaueis to the king of Fiance, who some yeais latei solu it to the Republic of venice. 0n 121u the venetian aimy took ?*,7-* (touay Iiklion), the laigest city anu the majoi poit of Byzantine Ciete, anu on 12S2 the islanu's seconu city, ?*,&* (piesently Chania). The venetian iule on the islanu holu foi moie than foui centuiies, as an oveiseas colony anu eastein bastion of the D&=5E"-' (6 @&,-'& in the Neuiteiianean Sea, until its fall to the 0ttoman Empiie on 1669. In the ieligious aspect, in all the teiiitoiies conqueieu by the 0cciuental Ciusaueis, a ioman-catholic hieiaichy was imposeu. Aftei the fall of Constantinople in 12u4 the sepaiation of the Chuich became shaipei than nevei; ieconciliation between both "uieek" anu "Latin" Chuiches was seen almost utopic. In the time that followeu the schism of the Chuich the venetians hau all the inteiest to piomote a iappiochement of the Chuiches. The ?(5,'-" (6 F&%%*%*GF"(%&,'& (14S8- 19S9) tiieu to impose a union of the Westein anu Eastein Chuiches. But in spite of the venetian authoiities' effoits to consoliuate this weak union, at the enu it hau little oi no effect, because of its non-acceptation by the ecclesial consciousness of the Chiistian East. The 0iientals, incluueu the Cietan, stubboinly iefuseu to confoim the Floientine teim, anu obstinately iefuseu the papal unionist policy. Theii language, theii uoctiine anu theii common oiigin weie the factois that, on the one hanu, kept them uniteu anu bounueu them with the populations of the moiibunu Byzantine state anu that, on the othei, uiffeientiateu them fiom the foieign 0cciuentals. Although the tensions piouuceu by the ieligious uisputes weie not negligible, in the eveiyuay piaxis of the D&1,( 7- ?*,7-*, wheie ielations with the venetians weie not connecteu with ieligious compulsions, the way foi peaceful coexistence anu the inteimingling of the two woilus was open. PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
S The venetian-occupieu islanu of Ciete, with its stiong maiitime activity, piospeieu laigely anu became a veiy living commeicial anu cultuial centie, a majoi Neuiteiianean empoiium, which ieacheu a peak in the fiist half of the 1S th centuiy. A big vaiiety of meichanuise was hanuleu back anu foith between East anu West, incluuing some Cietan piouucts well appieciateu in 0cciuent, especially wine anu cheese. Commensuiate with the mobility of meichanuise was that of people - incluueu pilgiims to anu fiom the )&:*,3-, anu thus Ciete became a place of inteiaction anu tiansaction foi a population of uiffeient ethnic anu social oiigins. This flouiishing situation beneficiateu venetians, but also autochthons Cietans: They weie exposeu to new expeiiences anu iueas, so bioauening the hoiizons of theii woilu. @; A)5#&#.3= #7.$ B"#$%#$& #$ ()$)%#"$ *+)%) Alieauy fiom the 1S iu centuiy onwaius -centuiy consiueieu as a "centuiy of piepaiation", with incieasing "Westein feeling"-, the uieek population of Ciete was exposeu to the on-going D&,*-..*,'& cultuie. Thus, most icon painteis establish theie weie able to execute woiks both -, 6(%/* 1%&'* oi -, 6(%/* "*3-,*. Buiing 14 th centuiy, the centie of aitistic piouuction was uefinitively tiansfeiieu fiom the capital of Byzantium, Constantinople, to the capital of venetian-occupieu Ciete, Canuia. Some Constantinopolitan painteis (Alexios anu Angelos Apokafkos, Nikolaos Philanthopenos etc.) weie establisheu in Canuia alieauy fiom this time. The piototypes of the impeiial capital aie the fine mosaics anu fiescoes of the ?B(%* monasteiy (ca. 1S1S-1S2u), the masteiwoik of the C*"*&("(1-*, D&,*-..*,'&, as well as the mosaics in the C*//*2*%-.3(. monasteiy (ca. 1SuS-1S1u). An impoitant influence was also exeiciseu by some chuiches anu monasteiies in Thessaloniki, Nystias, Neteoia anu Nount Athos. Ciete became a majoi aitistic centie in the fiist half of the 1S th centuiy. The collapse of the Byzantine Empiie in 14SS favouieu the islanu to become the most impoitant centie of Chiistian ait piouuction in the East Neuiteiianean. A huge piogiam of chuich constiuction anu uecoiation with both fiesco anu icon painting is attesteu by notaiial uocuments uiafteu aiounu that time. In 1S th centuiy Ciete a unique aitistic milieu was cieateu, which piouuceu some of the masteiwoiks of the time. Angelos Akotantos, Anuieas Ritzos, Anuieas Pavias, PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
4 Angelos Bitzamanos, just to cite a few names, belongeu to the so-calleu "Cietan School". Last but not least - although fiom a lattei time-, we shoulu name Bomenikos Theotokopoulos, uubbeu !" $%&'( (1S41-1614), who was boin in Canuia anu staiteu his caieei in venetian occupieu Ciete, befoie leaving foi Italy anu Spain. The ieligious painting piouuction in that time was a paiticulai foim of late byzantine scenes with influences fiom both 0iient (Constantinople, Sinai) anu 0cciuent. Thus, some 0cciuental influences aie obseiveu both in the thematic (Fiancis of Assisi, the embiacement of St. Petei anu St. Paul, etc.) as in the methous utiliseu. It is woith to iemaik the significance of 1S th centuiy Cietan painteis, such as Angelos Akotantos, in the foimation of a peivasive aitistic iuentity thought the islanu. C; DE) -#&3+) "$9 %E) F.+? .- G$&)5.= G?.%"$%.= Angelos Akotantos (uieu 14Su) liveu anu woikeu in venetian Canuia. Be was fiist- chantei anu icon-paintei, a piospeious citizen anu an impoitant intellectual of his time. By ieauing attentively his will, uateu 14S6, we leain some biogiaphical uata. Be hau veiy goou ielationships with the 4(,*.3&%9 (6 @*".*/(,&%(, wheie the veneiation of St Phanuiios was fiistly intiouuceu in Ciete. Like the abbot of this monasteiy, Angelos piobably belongeu to the pio-unionist paity. 0n the othei siue Angelos shoulu have hau a close ielationship with the 4(,*.3&%9 (6 +3 ?*3B&%-,& in the Sinai anu its /&3('B-(, (uepenuency) in Canuia. Appaiently, Angelos hau a well, fiist-hanu knowleuge of the iich Constantinopolitan ait piouuceu in the Byzantine capital the pieceuent centuiy. Be was in contact with some Constantinopolitan painteis establisheu in Canuia, anu he must have leaineu fiom them the ait of painting. That shoulu explicate the close iconogiaphic anu stylistic affinity between Angelos' icons of anu those attiibuteu to the afoiementioneu painteis. 0n the othei hanu, he was also influenceu by the woik of 14 th centuiy venetian painteis, especially Paolo veneziano. Angelos was able to haimoniously combine Byzantine anu Westein tiauitions. The aitistic piouuction of Angelos was so laige anu appieciateu alieauy at his time that "it woulu be no exaggeiation to say that he was the Bomenikos Theotokopoulos (El uieco) of the fifteenth centuiy" (N. vassilaki). A seiies of supeib Cietan icons by PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
S Angelos still exist to oui uays, conseiveu mainly in the Athenian museums Byzantine anu Benaki, as well as in the 4(,*.3&%9 (6 +3 H(B, in Patmos anu in the islanu of Zante. At least twenty of his woiks beai the chaiacteiistic signatuie "XEIP AIIEA0Y" (by the hanu of Angelos), uiawn in the classic Byzantine fashion:
It seems that Angelos intiouuceu into Cietan painting new iconogiaphic types, such as "St Phanouiios", "St ueoige on Boiseback Slaying the Biagon", "Chiist the vine", "the Beesis" (oi "the Inteicession"), "The Embiace of the Apostles Petei anu Paul" etc. These weie to become veiy populai subjects among the painteis contempoiaiy oi latei to him. As it has been saiu, Angelos coulu have counteu to the pio-unionist paity, which was veiy active within the peiiou befoie anu aftei the union pioclaimeu in Floience in }uly 14S9. Nany scholaiships have seen in this pio-union policy the explanation foi the intiouuction by Angelos of the iconogiaphic theme "The Embiace of the Apostles Petei anu Paul", since this theme symbolises the iuea of ecumenical peace of Westein anu Eastein Chuiches. Buiing the seconu quaitei of the fifteenth centuiy, Angelos was the leauing aitistic peisonality in venetian Ciete, anu some impoitant icon-painteis of the seconu half of that centuiy shoulu have been theii uisciples: Anuieas Ritzos, Anuieas Pavias anu Nikolaos Tzafouiis. The influence of Angelos can be tiaceu even in painteis active fai away fiom his time, like Bomenikos Theotokopoulos, !" $%&'(, uuiing his Cietan peiiou. *.$753=#.$ In the D&1,( 7- ?*,7-* of aiounu 14uu an extiaoiuinaiy aitistic phenomenon happeneu: Fiistly the fully uevelopeu, iich aitistic expiession of the Late Byzantine ait, the C*"*&("(1*, D&,*-..*,'&, aiiiveu fiom Constantinople, the capital of an otheiwise uying empiie; on the othei hanu the long-time venetian occupation biought to the islanu the influences of the iising Italian I5*33%('&,3(, which encompasseu, in tuin, the aitistic styles of )*3& $(3B-' anu the eaily D&,*-..*,'&. This PAINTINu IN vENETIAN CRETE: FR0N BYZANTI0N T0 EL uREC0
6 inteiesting fusion of Byzantine anu westein elements, accompanieu by a piospeious economical situation, favouieu a iich anu laige piouuction of high-quality woiks of ieligious ait. The ieligious icon piouuction in venetian Ciete constitutes a veiy paiticulai peiiou in the histoiy of ait. Poitable icons anu wall fiescoes piouuceu in the islanu oi by Cietan painteis weie alieauy at theii time, anu since then, veiy appieciateu. Some of those masteiwoiks, which we can aumiie even touay in eastein monasteiies oi in museums all ovei the woilu, aie the mateiialization of the uual cultuial expeiience of theii authois. The paintei 0,1&"(. 02(3*,3(. is the most iepiesentative figuie of his time. Bis numeious iuentifieu woiks aie the tangible expiession of the quality of venetian Ciete's icon painting in the seconu quaitei of the 1S th centuiy. Bis influence is inuisputably gieat anu extenus on multiple levels like, e.g., the intiouuction of some iconogiaphical subjects that theieaftei weie copieu "to the lettei" anu became veiy populai. Angelos' iconogiaphic anu stylistic noims weie imitateu by contempoiaiy anu latei painteis moie than that of any othei Cietan paintei. 0#>5#.&+"BE1 ! vassilaki, N. (eu.) et al.: "The Banu of Angelos. An Icon Paintei in venetian Ciete", Benaki Nuseum, Athens 2u1u.
(Central European Medieval Studies) Dragoljub Marjanovic - Creating Memories in Late 8th-Century Byzantium - The Short History of Nikephoros of Constantinople-Amsterdam University Press (2018)