1. The document discusses molecular orbital theory, frontier orbitals, and crystal radii of chromium and iron ions. It also discusses symmetry of octahedral complexes with pi-donor/acceptor ligands and metal-metal bonding.
2. The lanthanide contraction is summarized as the atomic and ionic radii of lanthanide elements decreasing across the series due to ineffective screening of outer electrons by additional protons.
3. Non-covalent interactions that influence host-guest chemistry are described, including hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic effects, and solvent/counterion effects.
1. The document discusses molecular orbital theory, frontier orbitals, and crystal radii of chromium and iron ions. It also discusses symmetry of octahedral complexes with pi-donor/acceptor ligands and metal-metal bonding.
2. The lanthanide contraction is summarized as the atomic and ionic radii of lanthanide elements decreasing across the series due to ineffective screening of outer electrons by additional protons.
3. Non-covalent interactions that influence host-guest chemistry are described, including hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic effects, and solvent/counterion effects.
1. The document discusses molecular orbital theory, frontier orbitals, and crystal radii of chromium and iron ions. It also discusses symmetry of octahedral complexes with pi-donor/acceptor ligands and metal-metal bonding.
2. The lanthanide contraction is summarized as the atomic and ionic radii of lanthanide elements decreasing across the series due to ineffective screening of outer electrons by additional protons.
3. Non-covalent interactions that influence host-guest chemistry are described, including hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic effects, and solvent/counterion effects.
Frontier orbitals HOMO Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital LUMO Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital SOMO Singly Occupied Molecular Orbital Hardness = = (E LUMO -E HOMO ) Softness=1/
Some Crystal and Ionic Radii Ion Charge Coordination Spin State Crystal Radius Ionic Radius Cr 2 VI Low Spin 0.87 0.73 High Spin 0.94 0.8 3 VI
0.755 0.615 4 IV
0.55 0.41 VI
0.69 0.55 5 IV
0.485 0.345 VI
0.63 0.49 VIII
0.71 0.57 6 IV
0.4 0.26 VI
0.58 0.44 Fe 2 IV High Spin 0.77 0.63 IV (SQ) High Spin 0.78 0.64 VI Low Spin 0.75 0.61 High Spin 0.92 0.78 VIII High Spin 1.06 0.92 3 IV High Spin 0.63 0.49 V 0.72 0.58 VI Low Spin 0.69 0.55 High Spin 0.785 0.645 VIII High Spin 0.92 0.78 4 VI 0.725 0.585 6 IV 0.39 0.25
Pauling O 2- (140 pm) Shannon O 2- (126 pm) 2
Symmetry of octahedral complex with pi-donor / pi-acceptor (p-orbital) ligands What is relative strength of overlap for d-orbitals in ?
3
Metal-Metal Bonding Overlap of orbitals between metal atoms can be of several types as shown below. With different metals we may observe a) covalent/electron precise bonds - one electron from each metal b) dative bond - HOMO to LUMO c) symmetry related weak overlap of bonding/non-bonding /antibonding orbitals
The number of metal-metal bonds is given by the number of d-orbital electrons that participate in bonding, usually in accordance with the 18-electron rule for each metal. For the square planar complex shown, metal-metal bonding is optimum with four electron pairs giving a quadruple bond (example [Re 2 Me 8 ] 2- ). Short inter-metal distances are first indicators of metal bonding. Questions 1. Would you expect a metal-metal quadruple bond to be staggered or eclipsed? 2. Why are only four d-orbitals shown in the energy level scheme?
4
5
The Lanthanide Contraction Wulfsberg p34-44
Atomic and Ionic radii depend on screening of outermost electrons-effective nuclear charge.
The lanthanide atoms and ions become smaller with increasing number of electrons due to ineffective screening and shapes of f-orbitals. There are many nodes or direct paths to the nucleus for outer electrons and the nuclear charge increases steadily across the series. By the time 14 protons are added there is a sizeable contraction because of the increase in effective nuclear charge.
Mikami, K.; Terada, M.; Matsuzawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3554.
Aqueous Chemistry of the Lanthanides and Actinides Major applications of the lanthanides are in electronics (sharp electronic transitions of f-electrons) and as catalysts for organic transformations. Lanthanide complexes afford a wide range of Lewis acids due to the variations in radii and charge density of the ions.
6
Chiral transformations are also increasingly important:
The Actinides The elements show wide variation in electronic structure with different oxidation states as may be expected with the comparable energies of 5f, 6d, 7s, 7p orbitals. An electron can readily transit between various orbitals with limited energetic demand. Consequently, several cationic species may coexist in a single solution of a particular actinide, compounding their aqueous chemistry. Nevertheless, the high oxidation states may be stabilized, as for lower elements, in high concentrations of acid. Furthermore, the solution chemistry of long lived actinides is dominated by moderately stable 3+ oxidation states and even more stable oxo-cations such as UO 2+ . These oxo-species are important for industrial separation of the elements from their ores.
7
Host Guest Interactions Non-Covalent Interactions 1) Repulsive Interactions with orbital overlap of electrons, repulsion occurs over a short range but increases by r 12 inside van der waals radius.
2) Charge-Charge interactions strong attractive forces between opposite charges, vary by r 2 , accounts for low vapour pressure of ionic compounds.
3) Dipole Interactions a) Dipole-Dipole: electronegativity between atoms results in dipoles in molecules that can combine according to Coulombs law. Decreases with r 3 . b) Charge-Dipole: similar to above except one molecule has formal positve or negative charge. c) Dipole-Induced Dipole: A molecule with a permanent dipole can induce a dipole in a second molecule that is located nearby in space. The strength of the interaction depends on the dipole moment of the first molecule and the polarizability of the second. Pi-electron systems, like benzene, are more polarizable. Dipole-induced dipole interactions are always attractive and can contribute as much as 2 kJ/mole to stabilization.Decrease with r 4 .
d) Fluctuating Dipoles(London or Dispersive Forces): Molecules behave like oscillating dipoles because of constant movement of electron density. In molecules that are located nearby to each other the oscillators are coupled. Coupled fluctuating dipoles experience favorable electrostatic interaction known as dispersive interactions. The strength of the interaction is related to the polarizabilities of the two molecules. Dispersive interactions are always attractive and occur between any pair of molecules, even non-polar molecules. Dispersive interactions provide the only attractive force between molecules in liquid N 2 , which boils at 77K. For a given atom-atom contact the energy of stabilization provided by dispersive interactions is very small (0.2 kJ/mole), but can make a large contribution to stability in large proteins.
4) Hydrogen Bonding- the hydrogen-bonding distance from H to O in water is ~1.8 , which is less than the sum of the O and H van der Waals radii (O, 1.5 ; H, 1.0 ). The distance from O to O is around 2.8 , which is less than twice the van der Waals radius of oxygen (1.5 ). The differences in electronegativity cause distortion in electron density and generate postive and negative partial charges. Hydrogen bonds can also be three-centered and four-centered.
O + O + 8
Solvent, Counter ion, and Entropic effects-large molecules can generate strong radial electric fields which have to be balanced by a high concentration of counter-ions. For DNA, the phosphate groups cause 2M concentration of K + close to the molecule, irrespective of bulk concentration, hence the the dramatic salt dependencies of DNA melting and DNA-protein complexation. In the condensed state, DNA helices are separated by one or two layers of water. In aqueous solution, highly charged cations such as spermine (+4) or spermidine (+3) are required to decrease electrostatic repulsion of adjacent negatively charged DNA segments. Entropy changes also accompany the transitions between DNA and protein states as solvent molecules are released or adsorbed.
5) Hydophobic Effects: In bulk water, intermolecular forces are isotropic. At the interface with hydophobic molecules like octane, these forces are anisotropic because the octane molecule does not form hydrogen bonds. Thus water at the interface is rotationally and translationally constrained and the entropy of these molecules decreases.
As isolated molecules aggregate in aqueous solution, the total volume of interfacial water decreases. The driving force for aggregation of hydrophobic substances in aqueous solution (phase separation) is the increase in entropy of the aqueous phase. Hydrophobic effects may play a significant role in host guest chemistry as the host may offer a polar/apolar environment to the guest which is more appropriate than the bulk solvent.
9
o o o o o o o o o o o o NONACTIN OR RO O O O O O Alternate Calixarene O O O O O O O O O O O O Na Na Fe O O O O O O O O O O O O Fe K S S S S 10
2.8 2.5 N M N 109 o 1.6 N M N 69 o 2.5 Angles, lengths and bite size in AzaMacrocycles N N NH 2 H 2 N N N N N Log K = 12 Log K = 22 N N NH HN Cu N N N N Cu