The document provides a history of warhead development for the Talos missile system. It describes the progression from early fragmentation warheads with low lethality to more effective continuous rod warheads. The key developments included:
1) An initial rod fragmentation warhead was adapted from anti-aircraft shells but had limited effectiveness over long ranges.
2) A continuous rod warhead was developed in which rods were connected in a circle to form an expanding ring with no gaps, greatly increasing probability of damage.
3) The Mk 46 warhead implemented this design with two layers of steel rods surrounding high explosives to form a continuous damaging ring.
4) Both conventional continuous rod warheads and nuclear W-54
The document provides a history of warhead development for the Talos missile system. It describes the progression from early fragmentation warheads with low lethality to more effective continuous rod warheads. The key developments included:
1) An initial rod fragmentation warhead was adapted from anti-aircraft shells but had limited effectiveness over long ranges.
2) A continuous rod warhead was developed in which rods were connected in a circle to form an expanding ring with no gaps, greatly increasing probability of damage.
3) The Mk 46 warhead implemented this design with two layers of steel rods surrounding high explosives to form a continuous damaging ring.
4) Both conventional continuous rod warheads and nuclear W-54
The document provides a history of warhead development for the Talos missile system. It describes the progression from early fragmentation warheads with low lethality to more effective continuous rod warheads. The key developments included:
1) An initial rod fragmentation warhead was adapted from anti-aircraft shells but had limited effectiveness over long ranges.
2) A continuous rod warhead was developed in which rods were connected in a circle to form an expanding ring with no gaps, greatly increasing probability of damage.
3) The Mk 46 warhead implemented this design with two layers of steel rods surrounding high explosives to form a continuous damaging ring.
4) Both conventional continuous rod warheads and nuclear W-54
During World War II most anti-aircraft artillry rounds usd !plosi" fragmntation #arhads that scattrd small pics of th shll in all dirctions around th !plosion. $arly anti-aircraft artillry rounds usd a tim dlay fu% that #as st to dtonat a spcific tim intr"al aftr firing. This tim dlay #as calculatd to dtonat th shll at a dsird altitud and #as st into th pro&ctil 'for firing. Th tim 't#n th calculation of targt hight and actual firing of th gun causd significant rrors( and th rror incrasd as th targt spd incrasd. )ftn th pro&ctil !plodd 'for raching th targt*s altitud or it passd 'y th targt 'for !ploding. Th d"lopmnt of th radio pro!imity fu% 'y +ohns Hop,ins Uni"rsity -pplid Physics La'oratory .-PL/ during th #ar impro"d anti-aircraft accuracy gratly( causing th pro&ctil to dtonat #hn it cam clos to a targt. Ho#"r( fragmntation #arhads had lo# lthality. During th #ar many airplans rturnd from missions #ith do%ns of hols causd 'y shrapnl and 'ullts( #ith no srious damag. Unlss a pic of shrapnl hit a critical componnt( such as a cr#man or an ngin( all it did #as punch a small hol in th aircraft s,in. - ma&or pro'lm #ith fragmntation #arhads is that th distanc 't#n fragmnts incrass rapidly as thy mo" out#ard from th !plosion. -t som distanc th spac 't#n fragmnts is largr than th dimnsions of th targt and th chanc that a fragmnt #ill hit th targt is "ry small. To ha" a high pro'a'ility of causing srious damag th shll must !plod "ry clos to th targt #hr 'last ffcts 'com significant. 0urthr studis at -PL in 1233 sho#d that for shrapnl to pntrat dp into a targt it ndd a "locity nar 14(444 ft pr scond( much highr than th 5(444 to 3(444 ft pr scond common #ith anti-aircraft shlls. 5 6larly th fragmntation shll #as marginally ffcti". Dirct attac, on an aircraft*s airfram is th most ffcti" mthod of dstroying th targt. Th airfram is th largst componnt and cannot ' protctd. Th ffct of damaging th airfram may ' immdiat disintgration of th targt. $!primnts #r conductd using largr fragmnts that might ' sufficint to cut through structural lmnts in an aircraft. -rtillry shlls #r machind #ith paralll groo"s as sho#n in th pictur. 5 Whn th shlls !plodd thy 'ro, apart into long rods #hich #r much mor massi" than small fragmnts( and #r capa'l of cutting through ha"ir parts of an airplan. Whn thy rippd through th aircraft s,in th rsulting gash oftn tor opn in th airstram causing grat damag. Ho#"r( ths shlls producd a rlati"ly small num'r of rods( and li, ordinary fragmntation shlls( ths rods mo"d apart rapidly and th chanc of hitting a targt dcrasd #ith rang. It #as ncssary to !plod th shll "ry clos to th targt. Still( ths shlls #r considra'ly mor lthal than ordinary fragmntation rounds. Whn th +ohns Hop,ins Uni"rsity -pplid Physics La'oratory 'gan d"lopmnt of Talos thy rali%d that thy ndd a mor ffcti" #arhad for th missil. Unli, anti-aircraft gunfir( #hich attmptd to fill th air #ith numrous rounds to impro" th chanc of hitting a targt( only on or t#o missils #r to ' fird at ach targt. Thy must ha" a much gratr pro'a'ility of succss than an anti-aircraft pro&ctil. Rod Fragmentation Warhead Th initial #arhad dsign for Talos #as an adaptation of th rod fragmntation pro&ctil. It #as d"lopd for th RI7-8- 0irst Tactical Talos missil that #as introducd to th flt in 1292. Th #arhad #as housd in t#o sctions placd around th ram&t diffusr tu' in a mor or lss cylindrical layr at th surfac of th missil. : It had a fragmntation layr composd of many indi"idual rods that fit tightly togthr. ;nath this #as a layr of high !plosi"s. - spac 't#n th !plosi"s and diffusr tu' allo#d ca'ls( #a"guids and prssur snsor tu's to pass to th lctronics compartmnt aft of th #arhad. This #arhad had th sam limitation of othr fragmntation d"ics. -s rang incrasd th chanc of hitting a targt droppd rapidly. 0urthr( studis of aircraft damag indicatd that to dstroy largr aircraft it is ncssary to cut from t#o thirds to th full lngth of a structural sction to achi" a high ,ill pro'a'ility. This r<uird rod fragmnts s"ral ft long( too larg for any practical #arhad. 1
81 Continuous Rod Warhead In 129= an ida #as proposd to connct many rods togthr to crat a larg circl. 5( > $ach rod #ould ' connctd at on nd to its nigh'or on on sid and at th othr nd to th opposit nigh'or. Th rods #ould ' foldd togthr into a compact pac,ag surrounding a cylindrical !plosi" charg. Whn th #arhad !plodd th rods #ould ' 'lo#n out#ard( 'ut still rmain attachd at th nds so thy #ould !pand into a circl. With no gaps 't#n rods th pro'a'ility of hitting a targt #ould ' 144? #ithin th radius of th circl if th targt #as in th path of th rods( and th rsulting damag #ould span th aircraft. This configuration #as far mor ffcti" than a disprsd pattrn of rods. This ida #as d"lopd into th RI7-86 #arhad for th $!tndd Rang Talos missil that #as introducd in 12:4. Li, th original #arhad dsign th n# continuous rod #arhad #as placd at th surfac of th missil( in t#o @6@ shapd sctions surrounding th ram&t diffusr. This #arhad producd t#o smicircular !panding sctions. Th outr part of ach #arhad sction #as t#o layrs of rods #ldd togthr to form a continuous rod. Insid this #as th !plosi". 1 - spac 't#n th !plosi" and th diffusr tu' allo#d passag of ca'ls and tu'ing from th antnnas and pitot tu' to th lctronics sction aft of th #arhad. Th 0irst Tactical Talos and th $!tndd Rang Talos missils #r producd in t#o "rsions. )n had a con"ntional #arhad as dscri'd a'o" .RI7-8- and RI7-86/. Th othr carrid a 7, 54 nuclar #arhad .RI7-8; and RI7-8D/. Ships #r r<uird to carry 'oth con"ntional and nuclar armd missils. $"n though th nuclar missils #r n"r usd thy occupid spac in th maga%in and rady sr"ic trays. This limitd th num'r of con"ntional missils a"aila'l. Th con"ntional and nuclar missils #r diffrnt lngths and usd diffrnt parts and assm'lis. Th nuclar #arhad #as positiond insid th inlt innr'ody that actd as th comprssor for th ram&t. It #as rali%d that #ith som modification a continuous rod #arhad could ' dsignd to rplac th nuclar #arhad. With som additional modifications to th fu%ing systm a singl missil #as dsignd to carry ithr typ #arhad. This #as th Unifid Talos RI7-8$ that #as introducd in 12:=. -ll su's<unt "rsions of th missil #r modifications of th Unifid Talos dsign. $arlir "rsions #r rmo"d from th flt 'y th mid 12:4s. Mk 46 Continuous Rod Warhead Th 7A 3: #arhad that #as d"lopd for th Unifid Talos RI7-8$ had t#o layrs of 12.=9 inch long 4.=9 inch s<uar rods surrounding a hollo# cylindr of !plosi"s. Th outr diamtr of th rod assm'ly #as a'out 1:.8 inchs( and th innr diamtr of th !plosi" #as 8.> inchs. Th #arhad #as =2.9 inchs long and #ighd 3:9 pounds( #ith ==9 pounds of !plosi"s. >
Th !plosi" #as >9? TNT .cyclotol/ and =9? RDB. Th moltn !plosi" #as cast into a stl shll formd 'y th innr linr( a for#ard nd plat and an outr shll. - thin silicon spong linr insid th innr linr pr"ntd th !plosi" from crac,ing as it coold aftr casting. Th 1C1: inch thic, outr stl shll not only containd th !plosi"s 'ut it sr"d as a filtr( along #ith a surrounding 4.4=9 inch thic, lad layr( to rduc th s"r shoc, of th !plosion on th rod assm'ly. -round th filtr layrs #r th t#o layrs of rods. T#o nd rings #r #ldd to th stl filtr to hold th rods in plac( and a 4.459 inch thic, stl strss s,in fit o"r th rods and #as #ldd to th nd rings to pro"id structural rigidity. 5( :
-t th rar of th #arhad #as th safing and arming assm'ly composd of th safing and arming d"ic( th dtonator and a 'oostr !plosi" charg. This assm'ly fit #ithin th rar nd of th stl innr linr. - ha"y co"r plat at th rar carrid th #arhad #hn it #as mountd into th innr'ody assm'ly. - stl support con #as #ldd to th rar nd ring and mountd to th struts that attachd th #arhad to th missil airfram. 8= Th safing and arming d"ic containd an arming mchanism that #as acti"atd 'y th acclration of launch. - pro!imity fu% #ith antnnas arrangd around th lctronics compartmnt triggrd a dtonator charg locatd at th rar cntr of th !plosi" assm'ly. This dtonatd a 'oostr charg that sprad th !plosion to th main !plosi" charg. Th rod assm'ly #as locatd for#ard a distanc sufficint to allo# th !plosi" shoc, to form and mo" "nly through th !plosi" cylindr to nsur fairly constant acclration through th lngth of th rods. 3
Unli, th arlir #arhads that had th rods arrangd around th outr surfac of th missil and had to pass through only a thin s,in( th 7, 3: rods had to pntrat th innr'ody shll and pass through th missil structur. This posd a pro'lm of dforming th rods and 'ra,ing apart th !panding ring. Th parts of th nos co#ling #r distri'utd around th #arhad to caus minimum distortion of th !panding rods. Th missil structur a'sor'd a'out 54? of th ,intic nrgy of th rods( rducing th initial "locity from 9544 to 3:44 ft pr scond. Impact #ith th missil structur had th positi" ffct of rducing th gap 't#n innr and outr layrs of rods( and this hlpd maintain continuity of th ring. >
Th 7, 3: producd on continuous circular !panding ring. It !pandd #ith full continuity to a radius of a'out :4 ft( and #as 24? continuous at a radius of a'out 24 ft. If a rod struc, a thin targt dg on it 'ro, into t#o parts( #ith th most damag occurring 'for th rod 'ro,. If a rod hit a thic, surfac it snappd into thr parts( #ith th cntr part doing th most damag. >
W-30 Nuclear Warhead )n of th pro'lms #ith th arly Talos homing systm #as th ina'ility to distinguish indi"idual targts in a cro#d. If aircraft #r spacd th right distanc apart in a formation th missil might fly 't#n thm and dtonat far nough from any targt to ha" a lo# ,ill pro'a'ility. This( com'ind #ith th limitd num'r of targts th fir control systm could ngag( mad Talos suscpti'l to saturation attac,s 'y larg num'rs of aircraft. In 1291 #or, #as undr#ay to d"lop a small nuclar #arhad that could ' dli"rd 'y aircraft. Th diamtr of this W-54 #arhad #as smallr than th Talos missil so it loo,d as if it could ' usd in Talos. - modifid "rsion of th missil #as dsignd to carry th W-54 in an innr'ody that formd th comprssor of th ram&t ngin. Th first flight tsts of th prototyp RI7-8; missils #r conductd in 1295( only 18 months aftr dsign #or, startd. Th nuclar #arhad #as sn as a solution to th saturation thrat. With a ,ill radius of 1444 to =444 yards th #arhad could dstroy s"ral targts #ith a singl 'last. Dust loading #ould ' th primary caus of damag at long rang( #ith contri'utions from o"rprssur and thrmal radiation. Th ,no#ldg that Talos #as nuclar capa'l #ould caus nmy stratgists to spac thir aircraft far apart to rduc th ffcti"nss of a singl nuclar #arhad. If attac,rs incrasd th distanc 't#n aircraft th con"ntionally armd missil #ould no longr ha" trou'l rsol"ing targts. =
D"lopmnt of th W-54 #arhad #as carrid out in a sris of fi" atmosphric tsts at th -$6 tsting grounds in N"ada in 1299 and 129>. 9 It #as th smallst nuclar #arhad at th tim and incorporatd s"ral n# faturs to gi" it @mor 'ang for th 'uc,.@ Th #arhad #as producd in thr "rsions( 7od 4 - =( all ssntially th sam si% and #ight. Hundrds of tst and training firings #r conductd using modifid W-54 #arhads #ith th nuclar matrial rplacd 'y inrt matrials( 'ut no actual li" firing shots #r conductd #ith th nuclar armd Talos missil. References 85 1. Continuous Rod Warhead( $ugn L. Noo,r( U. S. Patnt No. 5(324(5>3( +anuary =4( 12>4. =. Evolution of the Talos Missile( William Dartn( +r. and 0ran, -. Dan( +ohns Hop,ins -PL Tchnical Digst Eol. 5( No. =( 128=( pag 11>. 5. The First Forty Years, Chapter 3, The Missile Age( +ohns Hop,ins Uni"rsity -pplid Physics La'oratory( Schnidrith F Sons( ;altimor 7d( 1285( pag 12. 3. Innerbody Continuous Rod Warhead( $ugn L. Noo,r( 6harls R. ;ro#n( Eictor +. Dit%( and Harold S. 7orton( U. S. Patnt No. 5(==5(45>( Dcm'r 13( 12:9. 9. The u!lear Weapons Ar!hive( httpGCCnuclar#aponarchi".orgCUsaCTstsCind!.html :. Rod Type E"plosive Warhead( Ludolph 0. W,ant%( U. S. Patnt No. =(2>=(294( 0'ruary =8( 12:1. >. The Talos Continuous Rod Warhead( 6harls R. ;ro#n and 6harls 0. 7yr( +ohns Hop,ins -PL Tchnical Digst Eol. 5( No. =( 128=( pag 19>. Links USS ),lahoma 6ity Hom pag. Talos Talos missil and launching systm Talos 7issil Talos RI7-8 missil Talos History History of th Talos missil Talos Ram&t History of Talos ram&t d"lopmnt Talos ;oostr History of Talos 'oostr d"lopmnt Talos W-54 History of Talos W-54 nuclar #arhad 83
Nuts and Bolts Author(s) : Frederick E. Graves Source: Scientific American, Vol. 250, No. 6 (June 1984), Pp. 136-145 Published By: Scientific American, A Division of Nature America, Inc