Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chs - Cars
Chs - Cars
Chs - Cars
Richard T. Lu
Assessor Name:
Renel P. Cuaresma
Assessment Center:
MPTCI
Date of
Assessment:
The performance of the candidate in the following unit(s) of competency and corresponding
assessment methods
Unit of Competency
Feb. 2, 2010
Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Assessment Method
A. Interview
B. Written test
C. Oral Questioning
A. Interview
B. Written test
C. Oral Questioning
A. Interview
B. Written test
C. Oral Questioning
A. Interview
B. Written test
C. Oral Questioning
Note: Satisfactory Performance shall only be given to candidate who demonstrated successfully all the competencies
identified in the above-named Qualification/Cluster of Units of Competency.
Recommendation
For submission of
Additional documents
Specify:___________
_______________
______________________
______________________
Yes
Competent
OVERALL EVALUATION
No
General Comments
The trainee has been Satisfactorily Performed the given task to candidate who demonstrated successfully all the competencies
identified in the above-named Qualification/Cluster of Units of Competency.
Candidate signature:
Date:
Feb. 2, 2010
Assessor signature:
Date:
Feb. 2, 2010
Date:
Feb. 2, 2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CANDIDATES COPY
Richard T. Lu
MPTCI
Assessment Results:
Competent
Recommendation:
Assessed by:
Date Issued:
Date of
Feb.
Assessment:
Not Yet Competent
For submission of
Additional documents
Specify:_________________
_______________
2, 2010
For re-assessment
(pls. specify)
____________________
__________________
Attested by:
___Renel P. Cuaresma____
____________________
Date:
Feb. 2, 2010
Feb. 2, 2010
Date:
Feb. 2, 2010