Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Be Vocal Against Judicial Murder in Bangladesh
Be Vocal Against Judicial Murder in Bangladesh
Be vocal against
Judicial murder
in Bangladesh
Yet another death sentence upheld against a
leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami political group over
alleged war crimes in 1971.
Bangladesh Supreme Court has upheld the unfair and
flawed decision against Bangladeshi Opposition politician
and Islamic Intellectual, Muhammad Kamaruzzaman. As
the government maintains that there is no review provision nor
to plea clemency with President - contrary to provisions in the
constitution - it possible that he may be executed any moment.
Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina says the trials would
bring closure to the families of the victims.
But do these trials serve that purpose? Or, are they as some
critics allege - used to settle scores with the PMs political rivals?
Muhammad Kamaruzzaman was detained on 13th July 2010. He
was shown arrested on 22nd of July 2010 in a case filed by
Shahbag Police Station for obstructing police while they were
discharging duties. After enduring almost 2 years in prison without any charge, Kamaruzzaman was finally charged with 7 cases.
The charges are based on seven separate incidents of crimes
against humanity. Trials for these cases began on 2nd July 2012.
On November 3rd 2014, death sentence for Kamaruzzaman was
upheld by the Supreme Court in the final judgment of his appeal
against the verdict ordered by the International Crime Tribunal-2
last year.
The ICT was set up in 2010 to investigate abuses committed during the 1971 conflict but human rights groups have also expressed
concern that the court falls short of international standards.
Both Kamaruzzaman and Molla was the assistant secretary general for the Jamaat-e-Islami party, which earlier this year was
banned from taking part in elections.
Those calling for justice have been demanding it for so long that
now as the deliberations in the "International War Crimes Tribunal" reach a climax; their emotions alone are controlling their
thinking. For them, there is no alternative to this process. It is
beyond criticism. While this is on the one hand very understandable, it also blinds them to the dangers this situation is creating for
the country.- DW's Grahame Lucas writes as a response to the
death sentence upheld against Kamruzzaman.
Suggesting Bangladesh Grahame Lucas writes: Bangladesh's democracy would have fared better had it opted to go down the path of reconciliation like the one chosen by South Africa in the post Apartheid era
under Nelson Mandela. A Truth Commission if handled properly
could have done much to heal the deep wounds still festering in Bangladesh to the benefit of civil society.
It is deeply regrettable that Bangladesh government didnt pay heed to
numerous concerns and warnings by international community in order
to make the process of trial under International War Crimes Tribunal
(ICT) fair including the request of Secretary of State John Kerry, UN
high commissioner for Human Rights, Foreign Minister of UK, Prime
Minister of Turkey, Human Rights Watch, EU subcommittee for human
rights requesting Prime minister of Bangladesh that this process follows under the international jurisdiction. But Government has rushed
to judgment and planning to execute one by breaching all international norms. This execution, in all likelihood, will derail the democratic
process in Bangladesh.
International community has to take responsibility for what happening
in Bangladesh. International community should halt the consequences
of what this event will bring.
International community should give pressure to Bangladesh government not use force against any protest. Bangladesh government
should understand that that their response to this is under the watchful eye of international community particularly International Criminal
court as Bangladesh is a state party to the Rome Stature.
The ruling government has tarnished the image of the nation before
the world communities. They denied the call and opinion of United
Nations, United States, United Kingdom, Turkey, Australia, and Malaysia and different other forums and thus they are mulling to disconnect
the country from rest parts of the world.
Far from bringing justice to the millions of victims of the Independence War and their family members, executions
will only perpetuat
will only perpetuate a cycle of violence.
Read more to
learn about the
Kamruzzaman
Trial
Rolling Blog on Kamaruzzman
execution
http://
bangladeshwarcrimes.blogspot.ca/2014/11/
rolling-blog-on-kamaruzzmanexecution.html
Kamaruzzaman - the Sohagpur
mass killing: the offence for which
he was sentenced to death.
http://
bangladeshwarcrimes.blogspot.ca/2014/11/
kamaruzzaman-sohagpur-masskilling.html
Kamruzzaman
Trial: the full judgement
http://www.ict-bd.org/ict2/ICT2%
20judgment/MKZ.pdf
There are various reasons for Awami League to target a popular leader like him:
1. Muhammad Kamaruzzaman is a leader of Jamaat-e-Islami, the only political party in Bangladesh with an honest
leadership capable of moving this country forward from the ruins of corruption, poverty, and injustice.
2. Kamaruzzaman represents the younger generation of leaders within Jamaat-e-Islami who are open to much
needed reform and reorganisation of the party around the cultural synthesis of the people of Bangladesh.
3. Kamaruzzaman has been an outspoken critic of the ruling Awami League and through his writings he made people aware of governments corruption, oppression, and abuse of power.
4. Kamaruzzaman is one of the few leaders with a vision for Jamaat-e-Islami and Bangladesh. With his massive
grassroots support and his intellectual wherewithal, he is in a perfect position to bring his vision to reality.
5. Kamaruzzaman became an international face of Jamaat-e-Islami due to his diplomatic connections around the
world and in Bangladesh. His understanding of the world politics and ability to elegantly represent Jamaat at the
world stage was unparalleled.
With Kamaruzzaman out of the equation, the Awami League assumed that, the Jamaat-e-Islami will be a weaker
political force unable to cope with changing socio-political landscape.