Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order SC11-1622 February 11,2014
Order SC11-1622 February 11,2014
Order SC11-1622 February 11,2014
C!Court of jflorfba
Petitioner(s)
vs.
~omaSino
...
"
STATE OF FLORIDA
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
Case: SCII-1622
Lower Tribunal: 05-CA-7205
vs.
BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A. and
WILLIAM J. COOK,
Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs.
----------------/
APPLICATION FOR ORDER
Applicant Neil J. Gillespie (hereinafter "Applicant"), reluctantly appearing pro se due to
indigence and/or insolvency, here in the first person, applies to the Supreme Court of Florida
pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the Clerk to deliver to the
Applicant the court records in Case: SC11-1622 that are to be destroyed or disposed of
Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin.:
(g) Disposition Other Than Destruction. Before destruction or
disposition of court records under this rule, any person may apply to the court for
an order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records that are to
be destroyed or disposed ot: All parties shall be given notice of the application.
The court shall dispose of that court record as appropriate.
No paTty, person or entity other than me filed anything in the case.
All parties shown on the certificate of service were provided a copy of this application.
RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED September 27,2013.
Certificate of Service
I certify that the Application For Order in Case No. SC 11-1622 in the Florida Supreme
Court was provided September 27, 2013 to:
HON. THOMAS D. HALL
I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to each of the following:
HON. JAMES BIRKHOLD
Lakeland, FL 33801
County Center
Tampa, FL 33602
. I.
_ _ _ _
~uprtmt ctourt
of jflortba
2213SEP30 PH 1=29
SC11-1622
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2DI0o 97,
OS-CA- 7P);20ms~-----CASE NO.:
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
Petitioner(s)
vs.
The petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus with the Court. To
the extent the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directed towards the district
court, the petition is denied because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct
the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction. State
ex reI. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dis!. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla.
1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA
1982) (stating that ma:ndamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely
erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a
discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). To the extent the
petitioner seeks any additional relief, the petition is dismissed as facially
insufficient.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
A True Copy
Test:
~lf,$I/L
Clerlc Sliprellle
lt
C~Otut
kb
Served:
NEIL J. GILLESPIE /
RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS
HON. PAT FRANK, CLERK
HON. JAMES BIRKHOLD, CLERK
"wt
>"."j
JIIi~f
"II"
""~'.'''''"
11I ...,1.'"I'f
.il
II'
02/11/2014
$00 48 ~
~
:I-'::
I
AS
."IIW',
Hasl er
[!!:,:z,}j '.;.1#1 #I
I.
.~~
. .
("I
...
I....'
ZIP32~9~~
11 0 1'J..:.. h.............
I (i
'" .
J.
1.",)
SC11-1622
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
8092 S.VV. 115th Loop
Ocala, FlJ 34481
Iii i\iii i i hiii i Ii Ii it I' i i Ii iii I! i II i: iHip i iii i i! 11! I!! ij: HIP
---J