Page 1 of 18 Newsletter Title

March 2008
Volume 1, Issue 1 Envirowild/Flora
Information on Constitutional issues,
our Land Ownership Rights and
Articles:
whether Government can do what they tell us they can.

• Inverell Forum
Inverell Forum March 2008
• Coming Events
If you have never had the moment of boredom. and many speakers must
• A Grant in Fee chance to attend the support their stance
The organisation was
Simple Title Inverell Forum, please vigorously in the Audience
superb, with the compere
accept our hearty A1 Q & A times.
Dennis Stevenson
• Torrens Title recommendations.
keeping both a tight rein Their website carries an
Consisting of a variety of on the timetable and archive of previous
• Trespass
speakers covering such offering entertaining speakers, and booking
• Government diverse topics as Nuclear comments and jokes information:
Laws over Dangers, Multiculturalism, between speakers. http://www.inverellforum.org
Land Vaccinations, 9/11, QLD
Originally started 20 years Sam enjoyed it so much
Ownership Correctional System,
ago, the forum has had we are already planning to
Lightwave Therapies,
• Local Council speakers of all qualities attend the 2009 Forum –
Wellness vs Illness, our
Removal of grace its stage. All topics hope to see you all there.
contribution on the QLD
Land Rights are allowed and there is
Constitution 2001 & much --------------------------------------
no discrimination or bias,
more, there was not a
• Jokes

• QLD Constitution
2001
Coming Events
* Draconian
Punishment NSW FREE ADMISSION

• What Can You do Friday, 4th April 08 from SPEAKER: John Wilson
7:00 pm to 10:00 pm www.rightsandwrong.com.
• Info – Aus Don Moore Community au
Centre, The notion that a radical
• Info – US Cnr. Farnell Ave. & John has been battling the is one who hates his
North Rocks Rd, banks for some years. He country is naïve and
• Next Issue CARLINGFORD. is a firm advocate of our usually idiotic.
right to a trial by jury.
• Conttact Info He is, more likely, one
who likes his country
• Bank loans are
more than the mrest of
Fraud
us, and is thus more
disturbed than the rest
• Dispossessions
are illegal of us when he sees it
debauched.
• Discover your He is not a bad citizen
rights and how to turning to crime; he is a
protect yourself, good citizen driven to
your family and despair.
your country.
“Bank loans are fraud.” H.L. Mencken
Page 2 of 18
A Grant in Fee Simple Title
Most Australians do not know or understand what
they actually own when they purchase a parcel of
land.
As this knowledge is vital to clearly understand what is
being removed from you, the following details have
been included in this newsletter…………
The Australian structure of land ownership is
centuries old. The best definition of it can be
found in Blackstone’s Commentaries on English
Law, which are still a reference in all High Court
land cases.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/bl
acksto.htm
Blackstone’s definition of a Grant in Fee Simple
land ownership (commonly known as Freehold)
states we own –
• Tenements. The land itself and any
structures already in place on that land.
• Messuages. The right to build any
structures of any kind on that land.
• Corporeal Hereditaments. This consists
of substantial and permanent elements of
the land – the ground, soil, or earth
whatsoever; as arable, meadows, pastures,
woods, moors, waters, marshes, furzes,
and heath. It legally includes buildings, as
they use the land as their foundation.
Water cannot be owned, but the land
which holds it can. In its legal
significance, land has an indefinite extent
both upwards and downwards to the centre
of the earth.
Newsletter Title
• Incorporeal Hereditaments.
This is a right issuing from the physical
element of land, such as rent, incomes
from an enterprise on the land. They are a
right to have an idea that will become
physical on the land, ie to develop a
business and produce an income. An
incorporeal hereditament is the things we
do with our land including waste it.
As an element of our Fee Simple ownership we
also have the following responsibilities.
• At common law, landowners are not
entitled to use their land in ways
detrimental to their neighbours' use of
their own land.
• An owner of land may be able to sue for
nuisance against someone who does
something that adversely affects the
landowner's land.
• Landowners, or anyone else entitled to the
possession of land, have a legal right to
exclude trespassers.
High Court cases in support of our land ownership
rights
• The Commonwealth of Australia -v- The
State of New South Wales [1923] HCA
23; (1923) 32 CLR 200 [5 June 1923]
• Fejo v Northern Territory of Australia
[1998] HCA 58 (10 September 1998)
• The Wik Peoples vs. the State of
Queensland & Ors; The thayorre People v
The State of Queensland & Ors [1996]
HCA 40 (23 December 1996)
Page 3 of 18
Torrens Title
In order to determine and record land ownership,
the system of Torrens Title was legislated. Under
this system, a title deed carried any and all
restrictions, modifications, easements, etc that
were related to the land ownership. A purchaser
could determine whether the land was legitimately
owned by the seller, if money was owed, any
easements that would affect a new ownership, and
etc.
Newsletter Titlelegally to that title deed cannot
therefore attached
be enforced on a Grant in Fee Simple title.
High Court cases in support of our Title of
Ownership and attachments
• Lapin and Another v Abigail [1930] HCA
6; [1930] 44 CLR 166 (28 March 1930)
• Pirie vs Registrar-General [1962] HCA 58
(1962) 109 CLR 619 (30 November 1962)
• Hillpalm Pty Ltd vs Heaven’s door Pty Ltd
[2004] (1 December 2004) HCA 59
Many people believe that Torrens Title is the
name of their ownership of land.
IT IS NOT. Do not be misled.

If any information was not legally (with the Torrens Title simply RECORDS your ownership
owners permission) listed on a title deed then the of a Grant in Fee Simple parcel of land.
new owner was not legally responsible and able to
be held to any new impediment to his ownership
that could arise. Most importantly, any
unrecorded easement is extinguished and no
easement by prescription of implication can be
claimed.

STOP
Notice
This property is owned under
a Grant in Fee Simple Title
To all persons and entities
entering this property
without the permission of the land owners,
admittance is by Invitation only
OR
Trespass applies.

Rulings by the High Court of Australia –

• New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57; (2006) 231 ALR 485; (2006) 81 ALJR 427 (12 December 2006)
• Plenty vs. Dillon [1991] HCA 5; (1991) 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991)
• George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 (20 June 1990)
• Halliday v Nevill [1984] HCA 80; (1984) 155 CLR 1 (6 December 1984)
• Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34; (1923) 33 CLR 1 (9 August 1923)

Government legislation that was not in effect at the

time of purchase of that property and was not
Page 4 of 18 Newsletter Title

Trespass

As your Grant in Simple Title Deed is a Deed of

Trust between the private land owner & the
Sovereign and as such is protected by the
Australian Constitution and can only be changed
via a Referendum, there is no law that can remove
your rights. The police may only enter with a
Warrant.

Our property carries this sign at the front entrance.

Page 5 of 18
Government Laws over Land Ownership
You will find all Federal Government Acts listed
here - Commonweath of Australia Consolidated
Acts
There are hundreds of acts and while States do not
have to create their own and come into line with
the Fed’s, any Acts they make that oppose Federal
law are superceded by the Commonwealth laws.
The Federal Government had unconstitutionally
signed the Lima Agreement & Agenda 21. This
was done without a referendum of the people,
which is required to validate any International laws
and agreements.
After the first sale of Telstra, money was available
to all States who created Environmental laws in
line with the Federal ENVIRONMENT
PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY
CONSERVATION ACT 1999, which came from
the Agenda 21 singing.
Consequently, all State environmental laws stem
from this Act.
Reading a Government Act must always include
the ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT 1901.
While each Act carries its own Definitions
(Dictionary/Meanings), if it is not defined in the
Act, the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is the final
meaning.
In order to define the “family tree” of any Act, and
find the basis for it in law, use the Savings &
Transitionals which can be found usually at the
end of each act.
This defines where each Act has come from, and
using this information, the reader can go back to
the very first Act and determine the original intent.
State laws, particularly related to the Environment,
invariably have a flowing back to a Federal law.
It has become the Envirowild Researchers’
developed thought process, that all Government
laws over land can only apply to Crown /
Community Land. The private land can only be
offered the opportunity to participate and cannot
be forced, without his consent, to allow these laws
to remove his ownership in any way.
Newsletter Title
To allow you to understand the devastating impact
these laws have had on Australia, I have listed all
Acts that currently come under the jurisdiction of
the Department of Environment & Climate
Change NSW.
• Brigalow and Nandewar Community
Conservation Area Act 2005
• Catchment Management Authorities
Act 2003
• Coastal Protection Act 1979
• Contaminated Land Management Act
1997
• Energy and Utilities Administration
Act 1987
• Environmental Trust Act 1998
• Environmentally Hazardous
Chemicals Act 1985
• Filming Approval Act 2004
• Fisheries Management Act 1994
• Forestry and National Park Estate Act
1998
• Forestry Restructuring and Nature
Conservation Act 1995
• Forestry Revocation and National
Parks Reservation Act 1996
• Forestry Revocation and National
Parks Reservation Act 1984
• Forestry Revocation and National
Parks Reservation Act 1983
• Lake Illawarra Authority Act 1987
• Lane Cove National Park (Sugarloaf
Point Additions) Act 1996
• Lord Howe Island Act 1953
• Lord Howe Island Aerodrome Act
1974
• Marine Parks Act 1997
• National Environment Protection
Council (New South Wales) Act 1995
Page 6 of•18National Park Estate (Lower Hunter Newsletter Title
Act 2001
Region Reservations) Act 2006
• Wilderness Act 1987
• National Park Estate (Reservations)
Act 2002 • Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983

• National Park Estate (Reservations) • Animal Research Act 1985

Act 2003
• Biological Control Act 1985
• National Park Estate (Reservations)
Act 2005 • Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust Act
1983
• National Park Estate (Southern
Region Reservations) Act 2000 • Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982

• National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 • Commons Management Act 1989

• National Parks and Wildlife • Community Land Development Act 1989

(Adjustment of Areas) Act 2001
• Community Land Management Act 1989
• National Parks and Wildlife
(Adjustment of Areas) Act 2005
• Crown Lands Act 1989

• National Parks and Wildlife

(Adjustment of Areas) Act 2006
• Electricity Safety Act 1945

• National Parks and Wildlife (Further • Electricity Supply Act 1995

Adjustment of Areas) Act 2005
• Energy Services Corporations Act 1995
• Native Vegetation Act 2003
• Environmental Planning and Assessment Act
• Nature Conservation Trust Act 2001 1979

• Ozone Protection Act 1989 • Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986

• Pesticides Act 1999 • Exotic Diseases of Animals Act 1991

• Protection of the Environment • Fertilisers Act 1985

Administration Act 1991
• Fish Marketing Act 1994
• Protection of the Environment
Operations Act 1997 • Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies Act 1957

• Radiation Control Act 1990 • Forestry Act 1916

• Recreation Vehicles Act 1983 • Forestry (State Forest Revocation) Act 1978

• Road and Rail Transport (Dangerous • Gas Supply Act 1996

Goods) Act 1997
• Heritage Act 1977
• Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain
Trust Act 1980 • Historic Houses Act 1980

• Soil Conservation Act 1938 • Hunter Water Act 1991

• Threatened Species Conservation Act • Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901

1995
• Land and Environment Court Act 1979
• Unhealthy Building Land Act 1990
(repealed)
• Local Government Act 1993

• Waste Avoidance and Resource

• Marine Pollution Act 1987
Recovery Act 2001

• Maritime Services Act 1935

• Waste Minimisation and Management
Act 1995 (repealed)
• Mining Act 1992

• Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation

• Mutual Recognition (New South Wales) Act
Page 71992
of 18
• National Trust of Australia (New South Wales)
Act 1990
• Native Title (New South Wales) Act 1994
• Natural Resources Commission Act 2003
• Nature Conservation Trust Act 2001
• Noxious Weeds Act 1993
• Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
• Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991
• Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982
• Pipelines Act 1967
• Plant Diseases Act 1924
• Plantations and Reafforestation Act 1999
• Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966
• Ports Corporatisation and Waterways
Management Act 1995
• Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979
• Public Health Act 1991
• Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948
• Road Transport (General) Act 1999
• Road Transport (Safety and Traffic
Management) Act 1999
• Roads Act 1993
• Rural Fires Act 1997
• Rural Lands Protection Act 1998
• State Emergency and Rescue Management Act
1989
• State Environmental Planning (Permissible
Mining) Act 1996
• Stock (Chemical Residues) Act 1975
• Stock Diseases Act 1923
• Stock Foods Act 1940
• Stock Medicines Act 1989
• Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority Act 1998
• Sydney Olympic Park Authority Act 2001
• Sydney Water Act 1994
Newsletter Title
• Sydney Water Catchment Management Act
1998
• Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition (New South
Wales) Act 1996
• Transport Administration Act 1988
• Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities
(Prohibitions) Act 1986
• Water Act 1912
• Water Management Act 2000
• Western Lands Act 1901
• Wild Dog Destruction Act 1921
• Zoological Parks Board Act 1973
Although we have been misled into thinking the
original Environmental laws were vital to control
the destruction of the world through the myth of
“Global Warming” – examine how many laws we
had regarding land issues prior to 1970, then
examine how many have been created since that
time.
Look closely at those laws and understand how
they impact on our land ownership and the rights
inherent in land.
None of those rights were removed through the
approval of the people via referendum.
None of the laws stemming from International
Treaties were agreed to via a referendum. No
Governor-General or State Governor, assessing
these laws against our Constitutional rights,
protested on our behalf.
Do not agree to anything governmental over your
land. Agreement constitutes a potential removal of
your ownership rights always.
Do not leave any potential involvement with
governmental offerings such as Land Care and etc,
as verbal discussions. Get it in writing and
respond in writing.
Page 8 of 18 Newsletter Title

My observation is that whenever one law is found adequate to the discharge of a duty... it is
worse executed by two laws, and scarcely done at all if three or more are employed
therein.

Local Council Removal of Land Rights

Councils operate under the Local Government Act 1993

In the Savings and Transitionals – it is clear that Councils are now expected to operate under the
Environmental Laws as well.

Councils purport to govern many areas of Private Land ownership including –

1. Permission or refusal to build structures on your land.
2. The types of styles of home, materials an individual can build with, including colour
3. Landscaping controls on your land
4. Construction of swimming pools
5. Whether a business can be operated on that land
6. Zoning of land for various reasons

If we cross reference these issues with the facts of land ownership under a Grant in Fee Simple we
see that Nos 1 & 4 remove our Messuages.

Nos 2, 4, 5 & 6 remove our Incorporeal Hereditaments.

Nos 3 & 6 remove our Corporeal Hereditaments.

Councils take moneys for –

1. Rates charged over your land ownership
2. Fees for water supply
3. Fees for garbage removal
4. Assessing whether you can start a business, repair a structure, build a structure including a home.

No 4 removes our Messuages, Corporeal & Incorporeal Hereditaments.

In both sections we are left only with our right to buy a land which already contains a house – our
Tenement rights.

On the Escarpment above Wollongong, Council is removing the right to live in a house which has
been vacant for longer than 12 months. The tenement rights to your land.

Supreme Court of Appeal citing Bone v Mothershaw - 'he(Mr Bone) continues to enjoy the privilege of paying the
rates that the Council levies on his land' and he is allowed to walk on it.

When you read the Local Government Act 1993, among the sections, there are only 6 that refer specifically to
Private Land. They all involve a Contractual agreement.
1. 67A: Entering into an agreement with the land owner to remove graffitti
2. 67: Entering into an agreement with the land owner to do maintenance work on fallen trees, pipes,
kerb & guttering and etc – for a fee
3. 377: Delegating a council employee to establish the fee for such works on private land
4. 650: Entering into an agreement with the land owner to use private land for parking
5. Dictionary Section 3: "private land" means land the fee-simple of which is not vested in the Crown,
and land that the Crown has lawfully contracted to sell.
Page
6. 9428
ofAnnual
18 Reports: Newsletter Title
Concerning work done on private land

When you read the Local Government Act 1993, among the sections there are only 4 that refer to Fee Simple
1. 49: Land dedicated as a public or drainage reserve vests in the council for a grant in fee simple.
2. 723: Land conveyed for sale under a grant in fee simple - See below.

3. 50: Public gardens, drainage reserves & recreations spaces are vested in the council for a grant in
fee simple.
4. Dictionary Section 3: "private land" means land the fee-simple of which is not vested in the Crown,
and land that the Crown has lawfully contracted to sell.

However, there are 19 sections referring to Crown Lands, 51 referring to Community Land.

The word Zoning has only 2 sections and neither refers to Private land or Fee Simple land

Now the word Rates attracts 121 sections, however under Section 723 of the Local Government Act 1923

723 Land is conveyed free of certain interests

(1) A conveyance or transfer under this Division vests the land in the purchaser for an estate in fee
simple freed and discharged from all trusts, obligations, estates, interests, contracts and charges, and
rates and charges under this Act or any other Act, but subject to:

(a) any reservations or conditions for the benefit of the Crown affecting the land, and

(b) any easements, restrictive covenants, positive public covenants created in accordance with section 88D or
88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919 and public rights of way affecting the land.

Vest means 2 things

1. when it refers to Council and Government, who only maintain and care for Crown land, which is
ultimately in the ownership of the Community, to vest means to put in the possession or control of a
person or persons.
2. when it refers to the ownership of a piece of land in a Grant in Fee Simple title, with a transfer of
money exchanges, to vest means to pass into possession, descend or devolve on a possessor.

We buy our Grant in Fee Simple land under a Deed of Trust, a Deed of Inheritance & a Deed of Equity
between ourselves and the Sovereign, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth I.

This is both Statute & Common Law, in that the actual deed is a document established and protected under
Statute Law, and Common Law protects our rights of inheritance and equity.

Without the permission of the owner of that Grant in Fee Simple, the removal or breach of this Deed is
without Constitution support.

As the original purchasers of land, we enter into a financial arrangement with the Sovereign through her
designated agents the Government, pay the monies that are requested, this money goes into government
revenue and is used to finance government expenditure and we receive a title deed, reserving any mineral
rights, for example, for the Crown.

At this time, the agents of the Sovereign, state that we are buying this land, free of any trusts,
obligations, estates, interests, contracts and changes, including rates and charges under the Local
Government Act 1993.

To follow this through to the issue of Rates, none of the sections in this act state that the owners of Private or
Fee Simple land are required to pay rates.

The Envirowild researchers believe that as the Councils now operate under Corporation Law, by actually
paying rates a private land owner is contractually agreeing to an ongoing situation of payment, which Council
Page 10enforce
can then of 18legally. Newsletter Title
You are agreeing to the validity of Rates if you pay these monies without an accompanying letter
stating you are paying this account under duress and reserve the right to recover your money under
Federal law.

Regarding the issue of Zoning in this Act. There is no section connecting the ownership of Private and Fee
Simple land with the concept of a zonal / restrictive right to use the land. To do so, would clearly remove Fee
Simple rights and become a tort matter.

It is our contention that the Local Government Act 1993 operates to define the management of Crown and
community land, and has no validity over Fee Simple Land unless the owner agrees to allow that validity
through a verbal, tacit or written contractual agreement.

Development Applications and the payment of monies are contractual agreement to allow Local Council to
govern your use of your land. You are giving Council permission to remove part of your ownership.

Many people are concerned that council have the right to tear down an unapproved structure. This is not true.
This would first constitute Trespass. A case in point. In an expensive suburb in Sydney an elderly lady allows
refuse and garbage to build up around her home, bringing vermin into the area.

Council cannot interfere until the Health Code is violated at which point they require a court order to enter the
premises and clean them up. This has been done several times.

The lady simple returns to the creation of a refuse problem and there is nothing Council can do about it.

Finally – there are 17 mentions of the word entry.

The Local Government Act 1993 states that council or their delegated staff can enter without permission or
under a warrant if necessary. This is completely untrue. If the police cannot enter without a warrant, then
Council certainly cannot.

In Plenty v Dillon[9], Mason CJ, Brennan and Toohey JJ said of the proposition that the trespass
to the plaintiff's farm was of such a trifling nature as not to found liability in damages:
"[b]ut this is an action in trespass not in case and the plaintiff is entitled to some
damages in vindication of his right to exclude the defendants from his farm".

Windeyer J later doubted whether the origin of the idea conveyed by the term "exemplary
damages" was as recent as Huckle[24]. However that may be, what is well established is that an
award of exemplary damages may serve "a valuable purpose in restraining the arbitrary and
outrageous use of executive power" and "oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the
servants of the government". The words are those of Lord Devlin, no supporter of the general use
of this remedy[25]. His Lordship added that[26]:
"the servants of the government are also the servants of the people and the use of their
power must always be subordinate to their duty of service".

I have used this information to convey to the readers that Governments operate under the belief that we will
simple obey these laws because of who made them. That is our stupidity.

We must learn our rights, know and our rights and demand these SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE obey
our rights! More next issue….

"When two people meet, there are really he sees himself, each man as he wants to
six people present. There is each man as be seen, and each man as he really is."
Page 11 of 18 Newsletter Title
-- Michael De Saintamo Ancient Samurai saying

"Warriors take chances. Like everyone

else, they fear
failing, but they refuse to let fear control
them."

Jokes
HOW GOVERNMENTS PLACE NEW EMPLOYEES . . .

1. Put 400 bricks in a closed room.

2. Put your new hires in the room and close the door.
3. Leave them alone and come back after 6 hours.
4. Then analyze the situation:

a. If they are counting the bricks, put them in the Accounting Department.
b. If they are recounting them, put them in Auditing.
c. If they have messed up the whole place with the bricks, put them in Engineering.
d. If they are arranging the bricks in some strange order, put them in Planning.
e. If they are throwing the bricks at each other, put them in Operations.
f. If they are sleeping, put them in Security.
g. If they have broken the bricks into pieces, put them in Information Technology.
h. If they are sitting idle, put them in Human Resources.
I. If they say they have tried different combinations, they are looking for more, yet not a brick has been moved, put them in
Sales.
j. If they have already left for the day, put them in Management.
k. If they are staring out of the window, put them in Strategic Planning.
l. If they are talking to each other, and not a single brick has been moved, congratulate them and put them in Top
Management.
m.Finally, if they have surrounded themselves with bricks in such a way that they can neither be seen nor heard from, put
them in Government.

Don’t you just love being an Aussie!

THE FINAL WORD ON NUTRITION

After an exhaustive review of the research literature, here's the final word on nutrition and health.:

1. Japanese eat very little fat and suffer fewer heart attacks than us.

2. Mexicans eat a lot of fat and suffer fewer heart attacks than us.
Page 12drink
3. Chinese of 18 Newsletter
very little red wine and suffer fewer heart attacks than us. Title
4. Italians drink excessive amounts of red wine and suffer fewer heart attacks than us.

5. Germans drink beer and eat lots of sausages and fats and suffer fewer heart attacks than us.

CONCLUSION: Eat and drink what you like. Speaking English is apparently what kills you.

Sovereign People

The Australian Constitution

Legislative Power Executive Power Judicial Power

Queen / Governor General

State Constitution High Court

The Ministry Other

Federal Courts
Senate
House of Representatives

Government Departments/
Public Servants

Federal & State Governments Structure

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Queensland Constitution 2001

The Premier

Legislative
Executive
Judicial Power

Legislative Assembly Governor /

Parliamentary Secretary
Government Departments
Supreme Courts
District Courts
Magistrate Courts
Page 13 of 18 Newsletter Title
People / Chattels

Queensland Government Structure

 Page 14 of 18 Newsletter Title
Queensland Constitution 2001
The Queensland Constitution 2001 / The Brigalow Corporation /
The Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Queensland Constitution 1867 was reframed with 114 Changes, 131 Additions and 116 Deletions.
2. January 1998, QLD National Party documented a move to place the QLD Governor in the
Government as a Parliamentary Secretary under the QLD Constitution 1867.
3. This became official January 29 1999, the same day the QLD Constitution 1867 was reprinted.
4. Thus the Governor was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, but a
Public Servant of the QLD Government.
5. He was still using the Public Seal of the State on behalf of the Premier and Parliament of QLD
and maintained the appearance of the Governor to the Sovereign People of the State.
6. During the early 1990’s all important and relevant Acts were changed and framed, but were adjourned
without a definite date of reprinting.
7. On 3 December 2001, the Queensland Consitution 2001 came into being.
8. On this day, this became the “Fundamental Law of QLD”.
9. 7 June 2001, all the framed Acts were reprinted and became law.
10. QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent of any of the laws by
the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common
law and the separation of powers in that state.
11. 15 July 2001, The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3 created in QLD a Corporate
Government. This is known as the Brigalow Corporation.
12. The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commissions
under No. 0001244818.
13. The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555.
14. All Crown land, assets and infrastructure on that land including schools, hospitals, roads, etc are
subject to and responsible to the Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the QLD
Constitution 2001.
14. All Sovereign People are now persons under the Corporation, All persons are chattel ( a piece
of property that is moveable).
15. Their land, bank accounts and all items of ownership are now assets under the Brigalow
Corporation.
16. The Premier is now the Executive Leader of the Parliament of QLD.
17. All government tiers, including Local Council are now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD.
18. The public officials are not public officials of “the Crown” but public officials of “the State” of QLD.
19. The Common Law has been repealed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Q), Reprint No. 2, reprinted
as in force 2 March 2001 © State of Q 2001
20. The Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Magistrate’s Courts are now inside the Parliament of
the State of QLD, and as such must obey the QLD Constitution 2001.
21. The Australian Constitution, the Common Law & Equity, the High Court and the Federal Government
no longer have any superior governance over the State of QLD.
22. The State of QLD and the Sovereign People of QLD have only Civil and Statute Law in this state.
23. As private ownership can not exist under Civil and Statute Law, all private equity and inheritance in
the State is now the property of “the State”,
24. Under the civil law system, which is now subject to the Uniform Civil Procedures Rules of the
Supreme Court Act 1991(Qld), every person is guilty until they prove their innocence.
25. There has been no Referendum of the Sovereign People to approve any of these moves. This means
they are Ultra vires, an act beyond the powers or authority of the government.
26. Every State in Australia has begun its own “Legal Theft” of the ownership rights of the Australian
People.
Only the People can protect the rights of themselves & their families and stop this.
Page 15 of 18 Newsletter Title

Draconian Punishment 1 Warwick couple -

1 QLD fellow - prosecuted by an officer of the State for
cutting native tea tree to feed his starving livestock in this applied for permission to
time of severe drought. The Warrant to Enter executed by extend decking and
the public officials of this State was not for his property but received it. They notified
was for a property approximately 17 kilometres away. The council who did not come
District court Judge stated that the fellow had purchased the to check it. 12 months
property in the 1980's, in fact he had never owned that later, council contacted
property. Cost of remediation - $350,000. them wanting to know
who gave them
1 QLD fellow - prosecuted by an officer of the State for permission to build.
repairing severe erosion on a watercourse on his property Demanded it be pulled
by filling the degraded areas in with dead and dying black down. The couple
wattle and other vegetation and weeds which were of no protested, police came
value to the livestock as a food source. He then covered with a warrant, the owner
the vegetation with soil and replanted the areas with was arrested, now faces
pasture grass. Fine - $27,559.25 $125,000 fine and/or 5
years in jail. After high
1 QLD couple in their 60’s – long-term Lychee farmers, level complaints about
using regulation low-voltage electricity structures to deter the police treatment, the
common fruit bats. Obeying all necessary legislation. A couple have had their
University lecturer, with a fondness for bats, complains to computers bugged, they
the Environmental Defenders Office EDO, who institute have been followed and
legal proceedings. The farm was raided by police, who returned home to find an
went through every cupboard and drawer in the house, attempt had been made
including the families underwear drawers, ostensibly to destroy the decking,
searching for paperwork and dead bats. The bat with drill holes, piers
protection was removed, destroyed and within 1 week the knocked askew and etc.
entire orchard and farming enterprise had been destroyed They received 3 different
by bats. The couple have had no income for 4 years are copies of the same court
unable to access govt financial support while the case is transcript none of which
ongoing. matched their witnesses
versions.
1 QLD fellow who dug a huge dam on his property with the
view of supplying water free to a nearby retirement village 1 QLD lady – bought 18
in exchange for future accommodation. Department of acres and received
Lands Q have refused him the right to fill the dam, and are council permission to
pumping the water out when necessary. move a house to the land,
providing she put a
1 QLD lady in her late 60’s – Mrs Burns - who wanted to verandah around it. She
develop 23 acres and sell it off in order to build a home for moved the house, lodged
her retirement. All land around her had been developed a DA for the verandah.
with the exception of a parcel that had a restricted animal Since Christmas 2006,
order over it – for the Mahogany Sugar Glider. Her land she has alternately been
had been checked previously and was not included. At refused the DA and yet is
this time, she was refused the right to develop in case the received threats from the
animals wanted to visit her land. Judge White of the council re not having the
Planning and Environment Court in Cairns stated - : I just verandah finished. Her
find this astounding. Soviet Russia would be proud of land is adjacent to a large
these laws." Yet he upheld them. development in which her
Page 16 of 18 Newsletter Title
local council has an involvement, she finds gates left open, government organization,
tyre shredding devices in her driveway etc. She believes who entered into a
she is being forced off her land. scheme with our opposite
neighbour to fence off the
1 72 year old QLD gentleman who entered a contract with creek to a considerable
a major telecommunication company for a connection. distance from the
Ongoing problems – he spoke to staff in the office asking watercourse, on our land,
for compensation for his traveling costs and was arrested. without any discussion
Upon being asked whether he was guilty or not guilty, he with us whatsoever.
replied guilty with mitigating circumstances. The judge Needless to say, these
replied she was not interested in his defense. gentlemen were informed
of the rules of trespass.
A NSW farming family cleared land adjacent to the
protected Gwydir Wetlands. Their land was not protected Peter Spencer, a Cooma
and they had all necessary departmental permission. The NSW farmer, owning
Wilderness Society flew over the land taking photos and environmentally sensitive
the EDO began legal proceedings. Both that farm and a land, he spent many
property they owned in QLD were raided and all farming years developing a plan
operations on both properties were forcibly closed down. for it, and was refused.
This story is still being used by the media and the Began a fish farm with
Wilderness Society to point the finger at farmers re land eco-tourism in mind, the
clearing, even though the government themselves agreed rules were changed and
this family had been given permission. Yet that family are he lost that business.
now having to legally battle this issue, trying to recover Began farming sheep in
their rights to farm. Please note, the aerial photographs conjunction with the
were digital, which is illegal to use in court. University of New
England, the disastrous
A NSW family retired on a small holding in 2 portions, alpine bushfires and wild
being environmentally conscious and prepared to keep the dogs destroyed that
land natural because of eagle eyries. Minerals were found enterprise. He was then
on the property, right at the access between both told he could not access
properties and the owner was expected allow ongoing federal drought funding
truck access through his main acreage, and to forego his as he was not viable. He
right to enter the second property. Local council passed is now suing the Federal
the miner’s DA before any financial negotiations had Government for $10.5
begun, and the owners were told to agree or the Warden’s billion in carbon credit
Court would decide for them. The Warden’s Court is income.
specifically for mining issues.

We have a portion of creek through our property, where a

rock bar has become exposed and is spearing the water "Great things are
into soft soil on our boundary, causing very considerable not won by
erosion. We discussed blowing a small channel through impulse, but by a
the rock bar in order to return the creek to its original path
and were told by the Lachlan Catchment Management series of small
officials that the “creek had the right to do whatever it things brought
wanted.” These were the same men, from the same together."

-- Vincent Van
Gogh
Page 17 of 18 Newsletter Title

What Can You Do

Write! Write, write, write, write, write!

Remember that expression, “The Pen is mightier than the Sword”.

Because the written word does not go away. Forget emails, forget phone calls.

Go and see your local member, tell him what is happening, give him the information and
write him a letter.

Governments’ only Mandate is to protect the peace and prosperity of our Nation through the
rights inherent in our Constitution. Our voting power does not give them a Mandate to
damage our prosperity via vast overborrowings, removal of the Common Law and a
complete disdain for the impact on the lives of the Sovereign People of Australia brought
about by such issues as International Treaties & Draconian Regulations.

You the People have a Mandate however - to constantly inform your Local Member and
your State ministers of Your Will for Australia.

Your Will and Your Name in writing is People’s Power at work.

Info - Aus
http://www.commonwealthpropertyprotectionassociation.com/index.htm

http://www.sosnews.org/contacts.htm

http://ourcivilisation.com/

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/

http://homeownersrights.info/

http://peoplesmandate.tripod.com/

Fantastic newsletter – email: a.c.p@aapt.net.au

Info – OS
http://www.lewrockwell.com/

http://www.levellers.org/jrp/orig/jrp.jurquotes.htm

http://www.angelfire.com/rebellion/elizabeth/

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/
Page 18 of 18 Newsletter Title
.
Next Issue
Envirowild/Flora
1. The History of the Sovereign I tore myself away from
“Berkeley” theft of our Australian. the safe comfort of
Woodstock NSW 2793 ownership rights. certainties
4. Letters from our
2. Who appears to readers through my love for
PHONE: truth - and truth
02 63451254 be behind this
5. Contact groups rewarded me.
situation
around Australia.
E-MAIL:
sue.maynes@bigpond.com 3. Your role as a Simone de Beauvoir

How Can You Help?

Send us information
regarding cases involving
the ‘theft’ of our ownership
rights that you have
encountered.
Forward this newsletter to
friends, family,
neighbours. The more
people who know what is tremendous power in the
happening, the more written word.
people who ask the right
Understand that the
questions, the greater is
People must stand firm
our chance of stopping it.
against government theft.
Write to your local State
They are our servants,
Member, and Federal
not our rulers!
Representative. There is

About us….…
Editor: Sue Maynes A large group of
BHITW: Sam Maynes researchers in 5
Australian states have
Without Prejudice committed 100’s of hours
UCC 1-207 of time reading Law, Acts,
High Court cases,
historical documents &
articles in order to unravel
the web of ‘theft’ regarding
our land ownership rights.
We found that our rights
were greater than we had
anticipated.
Great enough to be of
danger to all levels of
government in their quest
for absolute controlling
power over the People of
this country.

ENVIROWILD/FLORA
Berkeley
Woodstock
NSW Australia
2793

COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
TOWN, STATE POST
CODE