Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Weighted Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli Type
Weighted Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli Type
Abstract: The structure of the weighted Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli type
appears when one combines both the structure of the Kothe sequence spaces [3] and
the structure of Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli type, introduced by Moscatelli in
1980 [11] and developed by Bonet and Dierolf in [4, 5]. The theory of this new structure
includes both theories.
The main motivation for our research on these spaces are the questions which remain open in the theory of LB-spaces. The most important one is the question posed
by Grothendieck [8] asking whether every regular LB-space is complete. This question
is answered positively in our present frame here.
This paper is divided into three sections. In the first section we introduce the weighted
LB-spaces of Moscatelli type and study strictness, regularity and bounded retractivity.
We also prove that these inductive limits are regular if and only if they are complete (under mild additional assumptions). In the second section we define the weighted Frechet
spaces of Moscatelli type and investigate when they are Montel, Schwartz and when
they satisfy property ( ) or property (DN ) of Vogt. In our third and last section
we establish a certain duality between the weighted Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli
type.
538
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
We shall always assume without loss of generality that for every v V , we have
v(k) > 0 (k IN).
Let (L, k k) be a normal Banach sequence space, (Yk , sk )kIN a sequence of
Banach spaces and V = (vn )nIN a decreasing sequence of strictly positive weights.
For each n IN we put
n
kIN
endowed with the norm k(xk )kIN k: =k(vn (k) sk (xk ))kIN k and k(V, L, (Yk )kIN }: =
indn L(vn , (Yk )kIN ).
For every v V , we define
n
kIN
539
then k(V, L, (Yk )kIN ) is continously injected in K(V , L, (Yk )kIN ). For the case
Yk = IK (k IN) we shall omit (Yk )kIN and write L(vn ), k(V, L), L(v) and
K(V , L), following the classical notations.
Clearly, for the case Yk = IK (k IN) and L = 1p , the space k(V, L, (Yk )kIN )
is the corresponding scalar Kothe co-echelon space and K(V , L, (Yk )kIN ) coincides with its well-known projective hull (see [3]). In fact the idea for our inclusion
is taken from the one in [3] for this particular case.
Moreover it is easy to see that k(V, L, (Yk )kIN ) and K(V , L, (Yk )kIN ) induce
L
on kIN Yk the same topology. In particular, if L satisfies property (), then
k(V, L, (Yk )kIN ) is a topological subspace of K(V , L, (Yk )kIN ) (compare with [3]
and 2.4 in [5]).
In order to define the weighted LB-spaces of Moscatelli type, we would like
to make the following three conventions for this first section:
(L, k k) will denote a normal Banach sequence space with property ().
V = (vn )nIN will stand for a decreasing sequence of strictly positive weights.
(Xk , rk )kIN and (Yk , sk )kIN will represent two sequences of Banach spaces
such that for each k IN, Yk is a subspace of Xk and sk rk | Yk
(in consequence, Bk : ={y Yk : sk (y) 1} {x Xk : rk (x) 1} = : Ak ).
For every n IN, the space L(vn , (Xk , rk )k<n , (Yk , sk )kn ) is a Banach space,
the inclusion
is continuous and the unit ball of the first space which we shall always denote
by Bn is contained in the unit ball of the second one, Bn+1 . Now the inductive
limit
540
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
For each k IN let Ck denote the closure of Bk in (Xk , rk ), Zk its linear span
and tk the Minkowski functional of Ck (we will keep these notations through all
section 1). The space (Zk , tk ) is a Banach space. Obviously sk tk|Yk rk|Yk ,
hence k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) is continuously injected in k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk )).
Now given (k )kIN IKIN , k > 0 (k IN) and v V , pk ,v will denote the
1
Bk . Then pk ,v is a norm on Xk which is
Minkowski functional of k Ak + v(k)
equivalent to rk . Therefore (Xk , pk ,v ) is a Banach space. Since supk vv(k)
<
n (k)
(n IN), the spaces L(vn , (Xk )kn , (Yk )kn ) and L(vn , (Xk )k<n , (Zk )kn ) are
both continuously injected in L((Xk , pk ,v )kIN ), for arbitrary (k )kIN IKIN ,
k > 0 (k IN), v V and n IN. Consequently, the inclusions:
are continuous. For the case (Yk , sk ) = (Xk , rk ) (k IN), the space K(V , L, (Xk ),
(Yk )) coincides with K(V , L, (Yk )kIN ) algebraically and topologically.
Furthermore, K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )) has a basis of 0-neighbourhoods formed by
the sets
Y
kIN
k Ak + Bv K V , L, (Xk ), (Yk ) ,
and v V where Bv stands for the unit ball in L(v, (Yk )kIN ). Moreover k(V, L,
L
(Xk ), (Yk )) and K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )) induce the same topology on kIN Xk .
1.2 Proposition. Let (Zk , tk )kIN be as in 1.1 and k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )), k(V, L,
(Xk ), (Zk )) the corresponding weighted LB-spaces of Moscatelli type. The following assertions hold:
i) k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) = k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk )) if and only if for every n IN
Mn
there are m n, Mn > 0 with vn1(k) Ck vm
(k) Bk (k m).
ii) If k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) is regular, then k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) = k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk ))
and indn L(vn ) is regular.
1.3 Remarks.
i) The converse of 1.2 ii) holds whenever any of the following conditions is
satisfied:
a) each subset in k(V, L) = indn L(vn ) which is bounded for the relative
K(V , L)-topology is also bounded in k(V, L) (see [3]);
b) there is m IN such that Yk is a topological subspace of Xk (k m).
541
ii) Condition 2.4 ii) in [5] implies our condition 1.2 i) and they are different
(of course they coincide if vn (k) = 1, (k IN)). Indeed, from 2.6 in [5], given an
infinite dimensional Banach space (X, r), for each m IN, there is a bounded Banach disc in (X, r), Dm , whose closure is contained in M Dm , for some M 1 but
not contained in mDm . According to this, we can obtain a sequence of bounded
Banach discs, (Bk )kIN , and a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers,
(nk )kIN , such that B k nk Bk and B k+1 6 nk Bk+1 . Put Yk : = LIN(Bk ) (linear
span of Bk ), sk the Minkowski functional
of Bk , and take (X, r), (Yk , sk )kIN and
m
1
V = (vm )mIN with vm (k) = nk , m, k IN. For each k m + 1,
1
1
x
x
Bk .
Bk = (nk )m Bk (nk )m+1 Bk =
vm (k)
vm+1
It follows from 1.2 i) that
542
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
Bvn ,1 , hence there is l IN such that L(vl ) and L(vr ) coincide on Dn , for all
r l, i.e. for every > 0, there is > 0 such that Bvr ,1 Dn Bvl ,1 . Take
0 = n r1 and let x 0 Br Bn be given. Then,
n n+1 r1
thus we obtain
that is, k((vl (k) rk (xk ))k<n , (vl (k) sk (xk ))kn )k and therefore x Bl .
1.5 Proposition. The following statements are equivalent:
i) k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) is strict;
ii) For every k IN, Yk is a topological subspace of Xk and for every n IN,
n
(k IN).
there is Mn > 0 with vn1(k) vM
1 (k)
Regarding Grothendiecks question [8] whether regularity implies completeness for LB-spaces, we shall provide a positive answer in the frame of these
weighted LB-spaces of Moscatelli type when either the space (L, k k) is a step
space (in the sense of [13]) satisfying property () or (L, k k) = (1 , k k ) or
(L, k k) = (c0 , k k ). First we should remember the definition of a step (cf. [13]).
A sequence space (L, k k) is said to be a step if:
a) (L, k k) is perfect;
b) (11 , k k1 ) (L, k k) (1 , k k );
c) (L, (L, Lx )) is a Banach space, where Lx denotes the -dual of L.
(Normal Banach sequence spaces satisfy always property b), cf. [6]).
1.6 Proposition.
If (L, k k) is a step, then k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk )) and
k(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )) coincide algebraically, they have the same bounded sets
and k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk )) is regular.
Proof: Let B be a bounded set in K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )).
1) An argument similar to the one in 3.1 iii) in [4] shows that there is n IN
such that xk Zk (k n), (xk )kIN B.
2) Let us see that ((0)k<n , (tk (xk ))kn ) indm L(vm ) (x B). Assume there
is x B such that ((0)k<n , (tk (xk ))kn )
/ indm L(vm ). Since L is perfect, for all
P
m
m IN, there is z m Lx with kz m kx = 1 and
k=n vm (k) tk (xk ) zk = .
543
ykm+1 6=
Jm : ={k
1
1
1
Ck ,
xk
/ tk (xk ) Ck = tk (xk ) v(k)
2
2
v(k)
whence there is k > 0 such that
xk
/
1
1
tk (xk ) v(k)
Bk + k A k
2
v(k)
1
tk (xk ) v(k) .
2
D
E
X
yU
k=n
ykn = 0 (k < n)
k=m
and
max{k IN : ykm 6= 0} < min{k : ykm+1 6= 0} .
Now the proof finishes as in part 2.
1.7 Corollary. If (L, | k) is a step, then k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) is regular if and
only if it coincides with k(V, L, (Xk ), (Zk )).
1.8 Proposition. If (L, k k) is a step with property (), then k(V,L,(Xk ),(Yk ))
is regular if and only if it is complete.
544
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
Proof: Let (x )A be a Cauchy net in k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )), hence a Cauchy
net in K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )). There is x K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )) such that (x )A
converges to x in K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )). Since K(V , L, (Xk ), (Yk )) and k(V, L, (Xk ),
Lm
(Yk )) induce the same topology on
n=1 Xn for all m IN, we obtain that
(pm (x ))A converges to pm (x) in k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )) for each m IN, where pm
stands for the projection onto the first m coordinates.
Let p be a continuous seminorm on k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )). Given > 0, there is
0 in A such that p(x x0 ) < /9, for , 0 0 .
Fix 0 and find m1 IN such that p(pm (x0 ) x0 ) < /9 (m m1 ). Now
for 0 and m m1 we may write:
p(x pm (x )) p(x x0 ) + p(x0 pm (x0 )) + p(pm (x0 ) pm (x )) < /3 .
There is m2 such that p(x pm (x)) < /3 (m m2 ). Take m0 = max(m1 , m2 ).
There must be 1 such that p(pm0 (x) pm0 (x )) < /3 ( 1 ). Choose
2 0 , 2 1 to obtain
p(x x ) p(x pm0 (x)) + p(pm0 (x) pm0 (x )) + p(pm0 (x ) x ) < ,
which proves the completeness of k(V, L, (Xk ), (Yk )).
In the case L = 1 the equivalence between regularity and completeness holds
too.
1.9 Proposition. k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is regular if and only if it is complete.
Proof: Let (Zk , tk )kIN be as in 1.1. It follows from (1.7) that k(V, 1 , (Xk ),
(Yk )) is regular if and only if it coincides with k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Zk )), and that
k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is the bornological space associated to K(V , 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )).
Assume that k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is regular.
We shall show following the technics in [5] that for every sequence of
positive real numbers (k )kIN ,
m
X
n C n 2
n=1
m+1
X
n C n
(m IN) ,
n=1
where Cn stands for the unit ball in 1 (vn , (Xk )k<n , (Zk )kn ) and the closure is
Q
taken in k(V, l , (Xk ), (Zk )) with respect to kIN (Xk , rk ).
Given m IN, let pm : k(V, l , (Xk ), (Zk )) k(V, l , (Xk ), (Zk )) be the
projection onto the first m coordinates and Qm : = Id pm , then
m
X
n=1
n C n
m
X
n=1
n pm (Cn ) +
m
X
n=1
n Qm (Cn ) .
n pm (Cn )
m+1
X
Qm
k=1 (Xk , rk ),
n pm (Cn )
m+1
X
n C n .
n=1
n=1
n=1
545
n
Put Dm : ={(((0)km ), (xk )k>m ) : xk Zk , tk (xk ) m
vn (k) (k m)}.
Q
Pn=1
m
Then Dm is closed in kIN (Xk , rk ). We claim that Dm = n=1 n Qm (Cn ). The
argument we are going to use is due to Ernst and Schnettler (see [7]).
1
. Otherwise
Given x = ((0)km , (xk )k>m ) Dm , put x1k = xk if tk (xk ) < v1(k)
put
k
xk
x1k =
.
v1 (k) tk (xk )
1
Then tk (x1k ) tk (xk ). Consequently, x1 k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )) and tk (x1k ) v1(k)
(k m).
1
1
Define x2 = x x1 . Thus x2k = 0 whenever tk (xk ) v1(k)
. For tk (xk ) > v1(k)
,
tk (x2k )
= tk
xk
1
xk
v1 (k) tk (xk )
= tk (xk ) 1
v1 (k)tk (xk )
m
X
1
n
= tk (xk )
n C n 2
n=1
v1 (k)
n=2
vn (k)
Pm
m+1
X
n=1 n Qm (Cn ).
n C n
n=1
and this shows that k(V, 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is the barrelled space associated to
K(V , 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )), hence complete.
In order to deal with the case (L, k k) = (c0 , k k ) in our next proposition,
we should remember that a decreasing sequence of strictly positive weights
V = (vn )nIN is said to be regularly decreasing (see [2,3]) if for every n IN,
there is m n such that for each > 0 there is v V with
vm (i) vn (i)
546
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
Proof: Let (Zk , tk )kIN be as in 1.1. From 1.2 ii) and 1.3 i) we get that
k(V, c0 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is a topological subspace of K(V , c0 , (Xk ), (Yk )) and it is regular if and only if k(V, c0 , (Xk ), (Yk )) = k(V, c0 , (Xk ), (Zk )) and V is regularly
decreasing.
Assume that k(V, c0 , (Xk ), (Yk )) is regular. Let B be a bounded set in
K(V , c0 , (Xk ), (Yk )), hence bounded in K(V , 1 , (Xk ), (Yk )). There must be
n IN such that
sup sup vn (k) tk (xk ) = M < .
xB kn
Since V is regularly decreasing, there is m n such that for each > 0 there
1
1
tk (xk ) v(k)
Cn .
2
v(k)
1
1
tk (xk ) v(k)
Bk + k A k
2
v(k)
1
1
tk (xk ) v(k) tk (xk ) vm (k) .
2
2
<.
2M
Since (pk ,v (xk ))kIN c0 , we have (vm (k) tk (xk ))km c0 . Therefore B
is contained in c0 (vm , (Xk )k<m , (Zk )km ). In particular K(V , c0 (Xk ), (Yk )) =
k(V, c0 , (Xk )(Yk )).
2 Weighted Fr
echet spaces of Moscatelli type
2.1 Definitions and preliminaries
In this section 2, we would like to make the following conventions:
(L, k k) will be a normal Banach sequence space with property ().
A = (an )nIN will stand for a strictly positive Kothe matrix.
547
(Yk , sk )kIN and (Xk , rk )kIN will represent two sequences of Banach spaces
and fk : Yk Xk will be a continuous linear mapping such that fk (Bk )
Ak where Ak (resp. Bk ) stands for the unit ball of Xk (resp. Yk ) (k IN).
Now, for every n IN, we define:
= (xk )kIN
Yk
k<n
Xk :
kn
an (k) sk (xk )
k<n
, an (k) rk (xk )
kn
k(xk )kIN kn = (an (k) sk (xk ))k<n , (an (k) rk (xk ))kn .
y = (yk )kIN
kIN
and G has the initial topology w.r.t. the inclusion j : G kIN Yk and the
linear mapping f: G projn L(an , (Yk )kIN ), (xk )kIN (fk (yk ))kIN . We can
always assume without loss of generality that fk (Yk ) is dense in Xk (k IN).
If Xk = Yk = IK (k IN), we shall write (A, L), following the classical
notations.
Recall that if Xk = Yk = IK (k IN) and L = 1p we obtain the Kothe echelon
spaces [3] and the case an (k) = 1 (k, n IN), we get the LB-spaces of Moscatelli
type [4].
Let us investigate when the weighted Frechet spaces of Moscatelli type are
Montel, Schwartz, satisfy property ( ) and property (DN ).
The properties ( ) and (DN ) were introduced by D. Vogt in [14] as follows.
For an increasing continuous function : (0, ) (0, ) we say that a
Frechet space with a basis of zero-neighbourhoods {Un }nIN has property ( )
if p q k C > 0 r > 0 : Uq C(r) Uk + r1 Up and a Frechet space with a
fundamental sequence of seminorms {k kn }nIN satisfies property (DN ) if:
Q
548
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
3 Duality
In this section, we shall follow the ideas in [3] and [5] to establish the duality
between the weighted Frechet and LB-spaces of Moscatelli type.
In order to settle such a duality we need the following proposition whose proof
follows thoroughly its restricted version to the Kothe sequence spaces appearing
in [3].
549
and
sup
rk (fk (yk )))kIN
:
y
=
(y
)
B
1
k kIN
v(k)
n
(m IN) .
1
rk (fk (yk ))
v(k)
1
I2 : = k N :
rk (fk (yk )) < 1
k sk (yk )
v(k)
I1 : = k N : 1
k sk (yk )
550
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
Take k I1 , then yk
1
1
v(k) rk (fk (yk ))(v(k)fk (Ak )
k Bk ) and
1
(qv(k) (yk ))kI , (0)kI
rk (fk (yk ))
1
2
k
v(k)
, (0)kI2
1.
kI1
1
Take k I2 , then yk 1
k sk (yk )(v(k)fk (Ak ) k Bk ) and
s
(y
))
(0)kI1 , (qv(k)k (yk ))kI2 (0)kI1 , (1
k
k
kI
2
k
(0)kI1 , (k )kI2 1 .
Thus k((qv(k)k (yk ))kIN k 2 and that finishes the proof since G is ultrabornological.
Let G = (A, L, (Yk ), (Xk )) be the weighted Frechet space of Moscatelli type
w.r.t. (L, k k) with (), A = (an )nIN , (Yk , sk )kIN (Xk , rk )kIN , (fk )kIN , each
fk having dense range and fk (Bk ) Ak (k IN). Because of lemma 2.2 in
[5] we may naturally identify (algebraically and topologically) the strong dual of
Gn : = L(an , (Yk , sk )k<n , (Xk , rk )kn ) with Hn = L0 (vn , (Yk0 , s0k )k<n , (Xk0 , rk0 )kn )
and define the weighted LB space of Moscatelli type H : = indnIN Hn = k(V, L,
(Yk0 ), (Xk0 )) w.r.t. the duals. We shall keep these notation all over this section 3.
Next we study the relationship between G0 and H.
3.3 Proposition. There is an identity map I : H G0 which is continuous. Moreover H is the bornological space associates to G0 and G0 coincides
topologically with K(V , L0 , (Yk0 ), (Xk0 )).
Proof: Let B G be bounded. By (3.2), we can find v V , k > 0
(k IN) such that sup k(qv(k)k (yk ))kIN k : y B} 1. Take k = 1
k (k IN)
1
0
0
and consider the Minkowski functional pk v(k) of v(k) Ak + k Bk . Observe that
1 0
0
2 qv(k)k pk v(k) 2qv(k)k (k IN). Now
B .
fk (yk ) 2
pk v(k) (fk ) qv(k)k (yk )
kIN
kIN
551
in G0 is contained in
Indeed, let f B . It suffices to show that kIN pk v(k) (fk ) kk k 2 for all
= (k )kIN L such that kk 1 and k > 0 (k IN). Fix one of those
Q
and take y kIN Yk with qv(k)k (yk ) 1 (k IN). Then (k yk )kIN B and
therefore
X
X
k |fk (yk )| =
|fk (k yk )| 1 .
P
kIN
Since pk v(k)
0
2 qv(k)
k
kIN
(k IN), we conclude
X
pv(k) (k fk ) 2 .
kIN
REFERENCES
[1] Bellenot, S. and Dubinsky, E. Frechet spaces with nuclear Kothe quotients,
Trans. Amer. Soc., 273 (1982), 579594.
[2] Bierstedt, K.D. and Bonet, J. Stefan Heinrichs density condition for Frechet
spaces and the characterization of the distinguished Kothe echelon spaces, Math.
Nachr., 135 (1988), 149180.
[3] Bierstedt, K.D., Meise R.G. and Summers, W.H. K
othe sets and K
othe
sequence spaces, p. 2791 in Functional Analysis, Holomorphy and Approximation
Theory, North-Holland Math. Studies 71, 1982.
[4] Bonet, J. and Dierolf, S. On LB-spaces of Moscatelli type, Doga Turk. J.
Math., 13 (1989), 933.
552
YOLANDA MELENDEZ
[5] Bonet, J. and Dierolf, S. Frechet spaces of Moscatelli type, Rev. Matem.
Univ. Complutense Madrid, 2 no. suplementario (1989), 7792.
[6] Dierolf, S. and Fernandez, C. A note on normal Banach sequence spaces,
to appear in Extracta Math.
[7] Ernst, B. and Schnettler, P. On weighted spaces with a fundamental sequence of bounded sets, Arch. Math., 47 (1986), 552559.
[8] Grothendieck, A. Sur les espaces (F) et (DF), Summa Brasil. Math., 3 (1984),
57112.
the, G. Topological vector spaces I, Springer, 1969.
[9] Ko
[10] Meise, R. and Vogt, D. A characterization of the quasinormable Frechet
spaces, Math. Nachr., 122 (1985), 141150.
[11] Moscatelli, V.B. Frechet spaces without continuous norms and without bases,
Bull. London Math. Soc., 12 (1980), 6366.
[12] Perez Carreras, P. and Bonet, J. Barrelled Locally Convex Spaces, NorthHolland Math. Studies, 131, 1987.
[13] Reiher, K. Weighted inductive and projective limits of normed Kothe function
spaces, Result. Math., 13 (1988), 147161.
[14] Vogt, D. Some results on continuous linear maps between Frechet spaces, p.
349381 in Functional Analysis: Surveys and Recent Results, III, North-Holland
Math. Studies, 90, 1984.
[15] Vogt, D. On the functor Ext1 (E, F ) for Frechet spaces, Studia Math., 85(2)
(1987), 163197.
[16] Vogt, D. On two problems of Mityaguin, Math. Nachr., 141 (1989), 1325.
Yolanda Melendez,
Departamento de Matem
aticas, Universidad de Extremadura,
06071 Badajoz SPAIN
E-mail: Yolanda@ba.unex.es