Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHL 102 Judgment and Proposition
PHL 102 Judgment and Proposition
JUDGMENT second act of the intellect by which it pronounces the agreement/disagreement between
terms or ideas
PROPOSITION judgment expressed in a sentence; it expresses agreement or disagreement between
terms
Truth value; either true or false
1. Categorical expresses a direct judgment; direct assertion of the agreement/disagreement of
two terms in an absolute manner. Example: All men are mortal.
2. Hypothetical does not express a direct judgment but a relation between two judgments, in
which the truth of one depends on another. If you break it, then you pay for it.
a. Conditional expresses a condition; if-then
b. Disjunctive expresses an alternative; either-or
c. Conjunctive combines two judgments; and
ELEMENTS OF CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION
1. Subject
2. Predicate
3. Quantifier expresses application or extension of the proposition; whether it applies in whole or
in part. Examples: All, no, some
4. Copula link the subject and predicate terms; expresses agreement or disagreement between
the subject and predicate. Example: is/are, is not/are not
STANDARD FORM OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AND VENN DIAGRAMS
All S are P.
Some S are P.
Examples:
All lawyers are liars.
No lawyers are liars
Some lawyers are liars.
Some lawyers are not liars.
QUANTITY, QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Quantity -- attribute of every categorical proposition, determined by whether the proposition
refers to all members or only to some members of the class designated by its subject term
LETTER
NAME
A
QUANTITY
QUALITY
Universal
Affirmative
TERMS
DISTRIBUTED
S
E
I
O
Universal
Particular
Particular
Negative
Affirmative
Negative
S and P
None
P
PATTERN
Su + Pp (Su +
Pu)
Su Pu
Sp + Pp
Sp Pu
LOGICAL EQUIVALENCE
EQUIVALENCE similarity in terms of meaning between propositions
EDUCTION process of forming equivalent propositions
1. Conversion switch subject term with predicate term. NOTE: The extension or application of the
terms in the converse cannot be increased.
Example: All dogs are animals Some animals are dogs (converse)
GIVEN STATEMENT
(CONVERTEND)
All A are B.
CONVERSE
All B are A.
No A are B.
No B are A.
Some A are B.
Some B are A.
2. Obversion (1) change quality (but not quantity); and (2) replace predicate with term
complement (-non)
Example: All dogs are animals All dogs are not non-animals (No dogs are non-animals)
GIVEN STATEMENT
(OBVERTEND)
All A are B.
OBVERSE
No A are non-B.
No A are B.
Some A are B.
3. Contraposition (1) switch subject and predicate terms; and (2) replace subject and predicate
terms with their term complements
GIVEN STATEMENT
(CONTRAPONEND)
All A are B.
CONTRAPOSITIVE
All non-B are non-A.
No A are B.
Some A are B.
REMEMBER:
1. In conversion, E and I propositions yield logically equivalent results (same truth value)
2. In, conversion, the extension of the terms cannot be increased. Thus, the converse of A is either
A or I.
3. In contraposition, A and O propositions yield logically equivalent results (same truth value)
4. In obversion, the truth value does not change.
~P
F
T
Q
T
F
T
F
P Q
T
F
T
T
4. Disjunction either-or statement. It expresses that two things cannot be false at the same time;
at least one must be true
Example: You either pass or fail Logic.
o Symbol: wedge (v)
o The disjunction is true when at least one of the disjuncts is true and that otherwise it is
false
P Q PvQ
T
T
T
T
F
T
F
T
T
F
F
F
5. Conjunction formed by placing the word and in between them
Example: Diane Reeves sings jazz, and Christina Aguilera sings pop.
o Symbol: ()
o The conjunction is true when its two conjuncts are true and is false in all other cases
P
T
T
F
F
Q
T
F
T
F
PQ
T
F
F
F
6. Material Equivalence the compound of two statements which is the condition of each other
(bi-conditional).
Example: The team will win if and only if they run the ball.
o
o
P
T
T
F
F
Q
T
F
T
F
PQ
T
F
F
T