Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Green Belt Group Assignment: Submitted By: Group 11 Aalekh Bhatt U113001 Abhishek Agarwal-U113003 Lohit Singla U113204
Green Belt Group Assignment: Submitted By: Group 11 Aalekh Bhatt U113001 Abhishek Agarwal-U113003 Lohit Singla U113204
ASSIGNMENT
Submitted by:
Group 11
Aalekh Bhatt
u113001
Abhishek
Agarwalu113003
Lohit Singla
u113204
Part A
Q5. List various types of process maps used in Six Sigma project execution along
with the reason of usage.
Ans.
A process map is a graphical representation of the flow of a process. Process
mapping is one of the basic quality or process improvement tools used in Six
Sigma. A process map includes information that can be used to improve the process,
such as:
Process Times
Quality
Costs
Inputs
Outputs
Combine operations
Process Flowchart
This chart simply sets out the sequence of activities and decision points. These are useful
for capturing the initial detail of the process. Labels showing the grade/level of staff
doing each step can be added if required.
Deployment Flowchart
This shows who does what along with the interactions between people and departments
(e.g. between case preparation staff and witness warning staff or possibly between Police
and CPS). This is also referred to as a swim lane chart as the page is divided into lanes
showing the various actions and how the process moves from person to person, or agency
to agency.
The various types of Process Maps used in Six Sigma Project Execution are as follows:
Basic process map: This shows the basic steps involved in a process. This is used to
get an overview of the nature of the process and the basic flow of work and
information across various activities.
Detailed process map: This identifies all the detailed steps of a process in sequential
order and tells a different story than the top-down flowchart. It shows a sequence of
detailed actions, like materials or services entering or leaving the process, or decisions
that are made to complete steps in the process. In fact, detailed flowcharts can be used
to describe any process that requires decisions or judgments to be made, like in an
administrative or service process, in a manufacturing process, or in a plan for
improving a process. Detailed flowcharts are most useful when consistency in a
process is important or attention to detail is required. It helps the people involved in
the process understand what action is required given the outcome of a decision. Like a
top-down flowchart, it can be used to study a process by first understanding the
process then finding improvements to be made (i.e., looking at the process as-is);
Design an improved process (looking at the process to-be); and Plan a project.
Opportunity flowchart: Opportunity flowcharts show the steps in a process and also
show whether each step adds value to a product or only adds cost. Value-added steps
are shown in the left column. These are the steps taken when everything goes right.
Cost-added steps are shown in the right column. These steps only occur when things
go wrong. If there are no problems, then only the steps in the left column are taken.
Opportunity flowcharts allow one to see where a process can be improved. They
highlight the opportunities for improvement. Opportunity charts separate those
essential steps for making a product from those that are included only to check for or
fix problems.
Value Stream Maps (Current State / Future state maps): The Value Stream Map is
a Lean tool used to understand the flow of materials and information through the
value stream to produce a product or service to a customer. It is commonly used to
identify opportunities for improvement in lead time. A value stream map tends to be a
macro-level map and contains much more information than a typical process map. It
is often used to identify bottlenecks in the process and areas that requires
improvement which leads to Kaizen Events or improvement projects.
Part B
Q2. The following data refers to 4 locations doing the invoice processing. The
number of invoices having errors and no errors was collected. Do a suitable
analysis to find whether the number of errors is independent of the location?
Which Location is contributing towards the error most?
Location
A
B
C
D
2
1
1
2
Error
8
7
8
6
No
1
2
4
1
Error
4
4
4
7
Conclusion:
1
The p-value is lower than 0.05, so we can conclude that the null
hypothesis is false and the number of errors is dependent on the location.
2 For Location A, the number of observed counts exceeds the expected
count and also has a higher Chi square contribution than location D. Thus
location is contributing most towards the error.
Question 4:
Ans. Calculation
The chart below shows the data and the calculations
Target Max
Defects/N
on-Defects
1= Defect,
96
Resolution
Time
61
129
77
115
79
95
88
67
158
67
202
37
32
86
187
72
78
132
42
50
90
93
114
65
86
30
155
94
95
33
50
Deviation
-35
33
-19
19
-17
-1
-8
-29
62
-29
106
-59
-64
-10
91
-24
-18
36
-54
-46
-6
-3
18
-31
-10
-66
59
-2
-1
-63
-46
0- Not a
defect
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
195
73
91
41
99
87
91
34
151
103
93
112
163
78
62
58
107
112
72
Total
Sigma
Rating
From the
Six-SigmaDPMO
table
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
Defects
50
DPO
DPMO
99
-23
-5
-55
3
-9
-5
-62
55
7
-3
16
67
-18
-34
-38
11
16
-24
16
16/50 =
0.32
320000
1.9-2.0
Number of opportunities = 1
Number of defects = 16
Defects per unit = Number of defects/Number of units = 16/50=0.32
Defects per Million units (DPMO) = 1000000* [Number of defects/ (Number of
units * Number of opportunities)]
= 1000000*[16/ (50*1)]
=320000
Using the six sigma DPMO chart we can conclude that the six sigma rating
lies between 1.9 and 2.0