Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Magnetic Storm of August 22, 1916 (April 2, 1917)
The Magnetic Storm of August 22, 1916 (April 2, 1917)
The Magnetic Storm of August 22, 1916 (April 2, 1917)
By
C.
F.K.S.,
22, 1916.
Superintendent of
Kew
Observatory.
S 1.
of
phenomena presented by
knowledge
way
phenomena,
of the
A difficulty in
the
the great complexity of the magnetic changes which take place, even
is
Some
of
more
local
to see
is
and
of events.
Of
late years
limited
number
copies of the
consider-
able
which appear
of disturbance
or
maximum
The changes
minimum
The
of
an
is
circuit.
value.
or
its
magnetogram
undisturbed
trace in a
to its
maximum
all.
in such a case
would resemble
fig.
1,
the
portions
AB,
DE
element,
BD
of the
we might have
of the
time
scale.
a double oscillation as in
fig. 2,
or a succession of
178
Dr. C. Chree.
them.
The movement in
fixed circuit,
On
of
fig.
the hypothesis mentioned, the departures at one and the same instant
time of any two magnetic elements from their normal values would stand
of
Now,
an
at least
of disturbance
action
magnetic
other
of
such,
total suspension
for
those
as
instance,
during
of
its
which
any second
source of magnetic change would interfere more or less with the regularity
it would naturally affect the different
The turning points might be accelerated in one
element and retarded in another, so that the movements in. the curves for
different elements at a single station would no longer appear strictly in
of
shape
of the
elements
differently.
phase.
|-
to
-A-
of trace
size.
movement
to nearer
is
a turning point has generally a finite curvature, the accuracy with which the
is
Thus
at the
same
is
exact demonstration.
When
discussing the
short
movements
were generally
in the traces
oscillatory,
i.e.,
ever,
absolutely
equal,
from
These movements
different stations.
for the
In such a
B.
At
a particular station
direction,
and
so
far
had the B,
from being
et seq.
179
22, 1916.
may
arise
from the
If so,
due
we might
to a simple source, as
in considerable
measure the
way
effects
to eliminate
of
But, on the other hand, the departure from exact opposition between the two
movements may be an
essential,
may
if so,
the
be the reverse
of helpful.
In dealing with the Eskdalemuir curves for 1913 and 1914, Mr. L. F.
Eichardson* came across a number of cases which he believed to represent
oscillation in a fixed azimuth.
movements
In
in the
Personally, I
am
it is
of
time.
However
may
this
be, there
can be no
more
in evidence in
When
others.
there
is
much
a difference of
in, say,
The
or counter-clockwise,
found no
of
was
may
first
less
Dealing
Analysing them, he
He
day.
clockwise)
(or
morning
3.
rotation
this direction
between 4
p.m.
and
The disturbance
am
August
Meteorological Office,
p.m.,
22, 1916,
is
while in
the
early
one.
Section
of the
so
is
horizontal
at
about
of the
in
force,
2, p. 78, 1913.
Roy. See.
A,
Note.
Mr.
Proc.,'
it
only on variations of the horizontal components, which are usually the most reliable.
180
Dr. C. Chree.
As
more
Stornowaybut
naturally interfere
of
with the
seem
not
does
it
The duration
outstanding.
meteorological
Scottish
twilight,
of
visibility
to
display of aurora on
The
artificial
suffer render
Kew
them unsuitable
disturbances, but, on
August
minor
most natural
details of
was
measurements at
graphic
copies
Kew
the
of
are
much more
exposed to
Eskdalemuir
were
curves
and
W,
at
kindly
fig.
H and D
common
time
The horizontal
and D, but
Kew
on August 22,
1007
"
H D
7Z0
bZQi
HOUR
Fm.
2
3.
HOUR
2 HOURS
set to a
to the
represents
&^0
way
horizontal force
SCALEVAWeS,
fac/i Length
Z30
by
two observatories.
Photo-
supplied
In
and
uncertainty.
components recorded
so large
A I
same
N and W are
instant of time.
at the
about 15*3
mm.
and reduced,
The
181
22, 1916.
for the
same
The time
interval.
scales
mm.
equals
7 in H,
6-1
4-6
(or O'S?') in
In other words,
10 minutes of time.
of
if
be the
time
2^
10.
N' and
Similarly,
same
are the
Declination at
the
and
Kew
Observatory
is
as
minutes
to the
but for a
of time.
We may
W.
about 15*1
W,
and
thus regard
directions, the first inclined 15*1 west of north, the other 15*1 south of
west.
difference in
phase
and
curves in
is
Hence,
if
and
fig.
is
a considerable resemblance
close.
much
Eskdalemuir
larger
far
from
the
English
border,
of
Kew.
not very
is
was very
As
'
the
difference
may
well have
To
arrive at
an
of this type,
Isles,
obviously
and between
and
if
W, we
two hours.
At
is
W with N.
It
to identity of
same
for the
two elements,
so that,
even
if
the records
would have
undergone change.
4.
To study
nearly 1
Kew
mm.)
details,
measured at 4-minute
W.
(or
very
H and D
and
182
AW,
Dr. C. Chree.
and AY, that appear in Table
The inclination
I.
AW,
to the horizon i^ of
AV,
and
(was
which special
to
p.m.,
ai4(-rj
'
o
/8.i6(^-6T
240
.oai2(-s*'j
22a'
200
180
*y^/^
S.20(+29jp'
o>**>*****<*o
8.i2.(-a'')
i.26(+20)
20
\756(+!0')
4p
80
60
.^8.4(^5')
8.48^66J'*--.,^
fl.36(+40)
60
'oB.0(+6'')
80
\a44(H:52'')
P9.20
o<5.28(-*-47)
100
120
>8.40(+39)
140
^ai6
a32(+4oyo..^^^
!20.
^160
'*9.I2
140
180
"*"A36(+35T
S
Fig.
interest attaches,
interval.
fair idea
sign in
-f
extreme values
of
of the
^}r
relative
AV
means
of
of
4.
at
Kew
inclination
same
AV
the
disturbance at the
The
two stations
A
is
<
11
183
+ + + + + + +
ooioo'^oorJ^ooo5^--rH(^^l:o^:^fC)aoooc30J^Cilot--c^^olOlo^:^(^l^oo
(^^ c<i
CO
''i<
ao ao 00 1^
o CO
i>- i-^
1^ t> i>
<r>
o Xi :o o t^
77777 '''''''''''''
<
<1
i>.
ao
00 05 C2 05 QO (
''"'''''''
--
<
<
4.
4.
4.COOt^OOJ:^OOCi050500ir>-OOi--l>I>COCOi.0
1
'
1>.>X)OCCCOCOCCCO
I
oocoloo5G<^(^^rH(^l)o^:--)-^i:^rHC^Oo^:^'^^^>^covocq(^^(^^o^>oo^-o.t^
^TP00G<lrHi0G<lC0'^'^Tf<C0'^^0000Q00i0iOOOrH00'^C0C0OO<:0O
}
CO CO '^
^^
t-H
7777
Cq CO CM
-t^COCOiOCO(?qG<l
+++++++
<
f^'* '^ iO
^'^
1
CqOC0r-(00rHC<lC0i>G<10irHC00il-0i>O'^S<lX0C0C0I>0irHrH00OOG5Cq
r^4.
<
4.
4.rHCOt^X>t>-J>.00i--O0 1
c^rH
<
CD
OiOlOlOlOO-^, '^'^'^OCDOCOCOCOCqCO
llllllllllllilllllllllllllll
c3
00 1- rH Oi J^ Oi
.b- !>.
0 CO
1--
00 no i^
X-^ -t^
CO
00
t-^
CO
iLO
XO CO rH CD CO
rHCMrf*u:!ioCOCOCOCOG<lG<l(MCO'^OlOiOCD^^^^^'^'?OCNCqcOCOCOCO
1
*-^O^XfMCOO^OO'?^-:OO^aO!?qcDO'^00(MCOO'^00?qcOOrffoO!MCDO
T--irH(?q(?q{Mcoco'Tf<'^^u:>io
^'
t--iT-HCMcqG<icocO'^Tf('^io>o
CJi
d5
rH
O
J:^00OC0>i01>00rH>i00il>i>OC00i(MC0t^>i0
G<lrHT--l..
j.G<liO'^'*cOCOOCOi>i>
'^
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
^^'
CD
OOOOOOCD'^COCO'Tf<'Tf<COOOOOOiOOG<lCO
'
Oi 10
'^COOtMrHrHCMCOOiOiOOOi
>
<
'
'
'
'
"^
'
'
Eskdalemuir.
lOCOrHCOO^t-^^C5COlOOOCOOiCOCOrl<OOCOCOCOt^llOCOG<lC<JrHC<10CJG<lCO
^rHrH.i
irHrHrHl
||rH'?q'^Oi00G<lOi^t--ICOCQCOCOCOCOTj(COrH|
^++'*iii''''iiii77iii++++iiii!'
1
<
CD
^>lOoo(^^Oi^Or^^^col>OG<^<^qoo^OG<^^>^>t-r^^r^^:^(^^oq(^^!N^^(^a(^^^DO
cO'*T^-^co(?qcoco(?q(?qco^rH
coi>rfioi'^ioiocoT-ioio(X>co(Tj(G^co
^+
+ + + + + + +
+f
+ +
+'
1
1
I+'^Oi^'-^+l'-^THrH.
++++
lll
l>-OiOOXOCOX050COCJiOI^OJ^Xt>OCO
"^
COO'^t>C<Ji>rfl>iOCDJ:^t>Oi'*'*rft'rfirHCDCO
>
'--i'--i4.|ii'--i|.oqco'<^-^-<#ioi^i>
rHrHrHrH(?q(?qry>4.rH(MT^^T^^TflT^rti
1.
<
COrHt>OCOOOCOCOOCOOqCOOCNJt--lT^Jr~^Tj<T--iiOCOOCOCl>iOI>>COJ>T--lCO'^
<
<
'
777 ii+++++iii|i
C0i0t>-0iC0OO0:i0iC0G<lrHrHOiOl>10 00C0OQ0Tf(U5THT--l0i00Oih<*rHCO
^^-*cocococo(M(?qcoco(?q.-H
,-Hr-<
ifMooco-^jicoaicofM^assqrH^rH
^4- + + + + + + + + + + + +
'++'-;^'-; + +|
1
So^G0CqC0O;g|G0qC0O;3G0CqC0O^00(M-*C0O^00'MC0O-*00(MC0
rHrH(?q(?q(?qCOCO'^'^'*1010
'
rHrHrH(?q(M(MCOCO'?T'^-^>iOlO
184
Dr. C. Chree.
shown
Kew
AiSr= 211
AW ==
199
7,
The range
7,
AW = 226 AV =
7,
AV =
in
is
179
80
7,
and
at
in the Table,
Eskdalemuir AN"
at
viz.,
441
7,
7.
slightly larger at
Kew
600 7 in magnetic
storms have been recorded, though very rarely, at Kew, but a range of
are barely half those at Eskdalemuir.
441 7 in
course
the
at
by the
22 minutes, as presented
of
any element
as large as
if
N"
trace
at
Kew.
difficult,
and the
Eskdalemuir
N" curve,
usual, because a very small error in the time, or a very small tilt in the
measuring
scale,
Exception
may
effects.
a difficulty.
month
mean
This
generally
to accept as the
is
The
or a selection of them.
is
object
hour on
is to
normal
all
the
eliminate
the regular diurnal variation, the contribution from which varies from hour
This method
to hour.
to be, because
is,
we now know
it
Also the
method
to a case
taken at intervals not of one hour but of four minutes would entail so
labour as to be justifiable only
one
In favour
least
if
felt
may
to the
assured of
its
marked
time of the
"
much
superiority.
Kew
curves at
sudden commencement,"
and that the ordinary diurnal variation during the evening hours covered by
the Table
that
it is
5.
shown
is
so small
practically immaterial
The
how we
as vector diagrams in
and 8.44
fig.
p.m.
4.
is
it.
between 7.48
p.m.
and 9.24
p.m. are
minutes
treat
of co-ordinates.
by
crosses refer to
by
circles
refer
'^
The ranges
as
7.
shown on
The times
the
Kew
to
curves are
AH
='225
7,
AD =
42'.
A thing to
be noticed
we
corresponding
i^.
is
to
however,
185
22, 1916.
W, and
some extent
so ai:e to
arbitrary.
If,
it.
A change in
it
is
described by a point
another.
and
for
If,
is
to
for instance,
larger
is
Eskdalemuir and
is
Kew
diagrams,
oriented roughly
lie close
together,
when
time or in the curve measurement for either station w.ould exert an unusually
large influence on the azimuth.
field at
field at
Kew
fi^xed
direction, this direction being roughly that of the line connecting the
two
stations.
almost certainly due in the main to electrical currents in the upper atmosphere.
These changes show a clear dependence on local time, and so are presumably
ultimately due to the sun.
The
solar influence
may
If it
is
be purely electrical,
thermal, the
e.g.,
difference
between the diurnal variations on quiet and disturbed days, and between the
diurnal variations in years of
many and
is
of
is
that these other causes reduce the electrical resistance of the upper atmosphere
and
is
so increase the
due.
The
magnitude
of the currents to
that, the
phase
is
shows a marked
186
Dr. C. Chree.
throughout the whole of the
upper atmosphere, and that the phenomena are chiefly dependent on the
current existing within a moderate distance of the zenith of the place.
The influence
disturbance.
Kew
by reference
Britain
is
phenomena presented by
hour
to the
of the
But
the day.
of
is
Of course, the
northern horizon.
and only
The
fact
in a
that
the
Eskdalemuir than
minor degree
at
currents
may
Below a
is visible.
August
of
the
where aurora
was
22
much
is
seen.
larger
at
to electrical
currents present in
so,
to currents existing
disturbance
Kew
down towards
restricted to
Kew,
or it
much
latitudes were
electrical
the latitude
of
of
stronger in
Aurora
is
much more
in evidence in
thus,
if
would
to
The magnetic
Kew.
visible,
is
they
force
due
to
inversely as the distance from the current, while the strength of the field
due
to a closed electrical
largest diameter
Thus,
circuit
at a
if
difficult to
imagine
how
4.
would naturally
field
It
of
is.
few hundred
exhibited in
arise if
the nearer
portions of current were oriented east-west, and the centre of the current
area
moved
tinued
of
If a current of
Kew,
as
was
to be greater at the
But such
transit
negative,
both
was
to
I,
that
component
AV, while
in
AV
occurred nearly,
of sign
from minus
These changes
on the hypothesis
of
current.
electrical
mere change
of
generally
stations.
of the horizontal
quite, simultaneously
AV
when
It will be
of force.
AV
187
22, 1916.
AW,
sign
not
though
change
seem
difficult to
account for
if
N",
definite
as well.
If the disturbance
to Profs.
were due
to electrons
and
to a current following the lines of force, but not extending below the
regions of the
atmosphere.
Storrner's observations
and estimates
may
upper
made,
be easier
of the area
many
possibilities,
phenomena
In cases such as
It is
may
Mr. Sangster.
phenomenon discovered by
of interest.
VOL. XCIII.