Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document PDF
Document PDF
Document PDF
THE
SWOOSH OF
CREATIVITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Constant innovation has been the byword for Nikes success. This case study analyses
the ever-evolving marketing strategies adopted by Nike to become a global brand.
F
STYLING: PALAK NEB; APPAREL: NIKE
Shoes + Technology
In due course, even the hi-tech Air
Max technology was found to be
inadequate to entice customers. And
it was time for something that would
differentiate Nike in the long run. It
had to be at once very distant from
the core business and also very appealing. The focus was on digital
gadgets. It had less to do with shoes
and more to do with athletes. Nikes
sales philosophy if you have a
body, you are an athlete had en-
06/13/2014 5:45:05 PM
ikes success lies in its ability to keep the brand modern and
relevant in an ever-changing marketplace. It also remains
consistent with its original brand identity. The Just Do It tagline epitomises the lonely, rebel runner who aggressively
strives to overcome his/her physical and psychological limits.
The brand identity, therefore, is in sync with the ideas of individualism, aggressiveness, performance and empowerment. This
helps Nike differentiate itself from its competitors. While
Adidass identity is built on team activities and community
achievement, Reebok focuses on fashion and street credibility.
Nikes latest hi-tech innovations such as Nike + FuelBand focuses on individuality as it helps users track and improve their
athletic performances. But the move towards social media is potentially dangerous as the idea of sharing information and belonging to a virtual community may be at odds with the individualism and rebelliousness of the Nike brand.
Of course Nike cannot ignore the social media but it needs to
embrace it in a way that does not impact its brand positioning.
The stress on using social media as a platform in which individual achievements are celebrated seems to be the right way to go.
The Nike consumer remains a self-focused warrior but one that
is less isolated in his/her struggles thanks to Nike technology.
Nikes brand management, therefore, is based on continuous
revitalisation through gradual delivery changes in the brands
positioning. This approach is less risky than the intermittent repositioning efforts of other brands (for example Burberry Group).
Continuous revitalisation needs constant investment in consumer research with focus on development of brand image and
the extent to which brand p
perception
aligns with brand identity.
p
The USP of Nike is not its ability
abilit to effectively innovate but in
its understanding of how innova
innovation can be used to reinforce its
original associations.
Nikes success
llies in its ability to
understand how
u
iinnovation can be
used to reinforce
u
brand identity
b
SSIMONA BOTTI
A
Associate
Professor of Marketing,
LLondon Business School
06/13/2014 4:29:17 PM
sets a new challenge for its followers. And it is here that Nike Fuel
comes into play. Users can compare
the Nike Fuel accumulated and
comment on the challenge, motivate each other, share their difficulties and get suggestions on how to
improve the general level of fitness.
Conclusion
Nike has been creative since the
start. It has been pushing the technological boundaries of innovation
to offer its customers new products
and also differentiate itself from its
competitors. Somewhere in its evolution, Nike also realised the importance of hi-tech gadgets in day-today lives. So it started to combine
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
sharp focus
lthough Gillette entered the Indian market in 1984 and
launched its newest triple-blade system, Mach3 in
2004, sales were flat for a long time. The product did not
go through any changes and kept its key features such
as long lasting diamond-like coating blades,
PowerGlide smoothness, ergonomic handles, pivoting precision heads and premium price, which was 10 times more
than its two-blade competitors.
Even though the target customers were professional
men with higher disposable incomes than the average
Indian, the traditional, double-edged razor, could not
be dislodged. Indian men do not consider shaving
a significant enough activity to justify such a
premium. Gillettes Mach3 value proposition
was based on extensive consumer research,
which highlighted key concerns men had
about shaving: it was time-consuming,
caused skin irritation and was generally unpleasant. Mach3 promised
the closest shave ever in fewer strokes with less irritation. Research and development served as the key value
network component supporting this value proposition, as
it was crucial to deliver the promised performance.
Manufacturing, distribution, marketing and advertising
were geared for the global introduction through increased
production capacity and aligned promotional material.
With such indifference towards shaving, Gillette had
to focus on changing the consumers attitude, leading to
some creative marketing campaigns. For example, the
launch of the newest Gillette Mach3 in 2009 was supported by the Shave India Movement 2009 campaign
which included several initiatives. Gillette created the
platform India Votes... to shave or not to support this
campaign, which asked three controversial questions: Are
clean-shaven men more successful? Did the nation prefer
clean-shaven celebrities? And the big one: do women prefer clean-shaven men? For two months, various media
channels picked up on the campaign and ran interviews,
Traditionally, Gillette
relied on extensive
research and development
to create a single product
for global distribution.
The product was
supported by a marketing
premise that it would be
equally valuable to
customers globally. But
Gillette set aside its global
strategy in India and grew
its market share
dramatically. This case
study looks at how Gillette
innovated by tailoring
advertising and inventing
a new product
development process
to reflect local
shaving habits.
By GABRIELA BERNER, JADE
CHANG, MARINA DUNAEVA,
and LEONARDO SCAMAZZO
06/13/2014 4:30:27 PM