Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C BuildingBlocks Rahimian Nov071
C BuildingBlocks Rahimian Nov071
C BuildingBlocks Rahimian Nov071
C
U
U
T
a
g
STRUCTURE magazine
30
e
n
i
z
E
R
R
T
S
Building Blocks
Background
November 2007
R
T
S
h
yrig
Cop
C
U
e
n
i
z
Figure 3: Damped Link Element acting as coupling element between independent trusses,
Torre Mayor, Mexico City.
a
g
STORY 20
STORY 19
STORY 18
U
T
E
R
STORY 17
STORY 16
STORY 15
STORY 14
STORY 13
STORY 12
STORY 11
STORY 10
STORY 9
STORY 8
Example
STORY 7
STORY 6
STRUCTURE magazine
31 November 2007
STORY 5
STORY 4
STORY 3
STORY 2
STORY 1
STORY 0
E
R
h
yrig
Cop
20 Damper
10 Damper
5 Damper
C
U
3 Damper
2 Damper
R
T
S
1 Damper
e
n
i
z
Free Vibration
Conventional Damped System
a
g
Displacement, inch
U
T
6
4
-2 0
10
15
20
25
-4
-6
-8
Time, second
Conventional Damped System
Free Vibration
Damped Link System
Displacement, inch
-3
10
15
-8
Time, second
Damped Link System
Figure 7b: Free vibration Damped Link System.
STRUCTURE magazine
32
November 2007
20
25
R
T
S
0.100
DAMPING RATIO
0.120
0.080
0.060
0.040
0.020
0.000
0
10
15
U
T
NUMBER OF DAMPERS
h
yrig
e
n
i
z
a
g
25
Figure 8:CEffective
op overall damping as a function of damper distribution.
C
U
E
R
20
Brace
Yourself
for the
Truth.
STRUCTURE magazine
TM
M E T A L
A
F R A M I N G , L L C
D i e t r i c h / M i T e k
J o i n t
V e n t u r e
866.902.3447 www.aegismetalframing.com
33 November 2007
35
R
T
S
30
25
20
20
15
10
- 0.015
- 0.01
- 0.005
C
U
5% Damping
a
g
10% Damping
Conventional
Damped System
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
# OF DAMPERS
Figure 9: Maximum lateral deflection.
0.35
Damped Link
System
0.30
5% Damping
0.25
10% Damping
0.20
Conventional
Damped System
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
# OF DAMPERS
Figure 10: Maximum base shear.
STRUCTURE magazine
34
e
n
i
z
10
E
R
References:
Damped Link
System
U
T
- 0.02
5
0
0
0.005
0.01
ht
yrigDRIFT INDEX
Cop
15
Conventional Damped
System
Summary
0.015
November 2007