Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Facts of The Disaster and Related
The Facts of The Disaster and Related
3.1.1 Introduction
To assist in an understanding of the evidence relating to the facts of the disaster it is proposed
in this Chapter to describe the situation of Whiddy Island in Bantry Bay, Gulfs terminal on
the Island, and the offshore jetty at which the "Betelgeuse" was berthed when the casualty
occurred. An outline of the mode of operations carried on at the terminal, its fire-fighting
systems, the position of the tug and other vessels involved in the events of the night of the
disaster will then be given, and the duties of Gulfs personnel and their means of
communication with one another will then be described. An outline of the layout of the
"Betelgeuse" and its method of taking on cargo and ballast will then be given (and a
reference made to its sister ship, the "Cassiopce") and the Chapter will end with a
description of the weather conditions. It will be appreciated that it will be necessary to
consider a number of the topics touched on in this Chapter in much greater detail later in
this Report.
On the day before the disaster the "Betelgeuse" was visited by two surveyors acting on
behalf of two prospective purchasers of the vessel. Both took photographs of their survey.
T w o are reproduced in Appendix 8.
Photograph No. 2 in Appendix 8 is a photograph taken by Mr. Stewart (one of the surveyors
whose evidence is considered in Chapter 15) of the deck of the "Betelgeuse" and the centre
platform of the offshore jetty. Particular attention should be given to the following points in
the photograph:
(a) The top (second) floor of the personnel building will be seen on the left hand side.
(b) Next to it the control tower and the foam monitor on top of it can be observed. It
will be noted that the monitor is not pointing in the direction of the deck.
(c) Next to the tower will be seen the Chiksan arms. It will be noted that two are
connected to the ship, at the ship's manifold.
(d) Beside the manifold is the port Samson post of the ship. On the other side of the
deck will be seen the starboard Samson post. The riser for the vent pipes from the
cargo tanks came up the starboard Samson post. Particular note should be taken of
its position vis^-vis the personnel building, as consideration was given to the
possibility that flammable vapour from the gas riser might have been ignited in the
personnel building, which was pressurised and did not contain flame-proof
equipment.
(e) Forward of the manifold will be seen the wave-breaker on the ship's deck. One of
the fractures in the vessel occurred in the area between the manifold and the wave-
breaker; its exact location will be detailed later. One of the explosions in the vessel
occurred in the port permanent ballast tank known also as the No. 4(a) wing tank.
This is located under the deck, forward of the manifold and aft of the wave-breaker.
(f) The gangway between the centre platform and vessel can be seen on the left hand
side of the photograph.
33
responsible for all anti-pollution and safety measures in the offshore area. Under
P C O there was a jetty foreman, three jetty operators and a Plant Protection Operatl
(PPO).
The duties of the P C O would require him to be either on the ship or on the centre
platform, and it is not possible to state with certainty where he was at
commencement of the casualty. It is probable that the PPO was in his shelter on Dolphin
22 at the commencement of the disaster, as he would have been present at Dolphin 22 to!
log the arrival of Mr. Harris at the jetty.
It is probable that the remainder of the jetty crew were in the personnel building on the
centre platform at the commencement of the disaster as there were no transfer operations
talcing place and their presence outside on the platform was not required,
(b) On the "Betelgeuse"
The ship's pilot, an employee of Gulf s, was required to stay on board a tanker when it
was berthed at the offshore jetty. A cabin was supplied for him on the vessel.
(c) On the Island
The dispatcher is in overall charge of operations and communications on the Island.
Reporting to him are two pumpmen and two PPOs. He is stationed in the Control
Room of the Control building and sits at a large console by means of which he can
control transfer operations from the terminal. From his seat at the console he has an
unrestricted view of the jetty and a tanker berthed there (both of which would be well
illuminated at night). He is a key person in the event pf an emergency. He is required to
start the pumps to pressurise the water in the fire-main. He is required to activate the
emergency procedures, which would include sounding a siren on the Island and on the
offshore jetty, calling the tug-boat, the "Donemark" and the line-boat for assistance, and
telephoning the Bantry Exchange to alert a prescribed list of Gulf personnel and
mainland emergency services.
The Control building comprises a number of rooms. In addition to the Control Room, it
has a toilet, a kitchen and a number of offices. The evidence of the dispatcher on duty on
the night of 7th/8th January was seriously at variance with that of other eye-witnesses,
both as to the time the disaster commenced and how it started. One of the suggestions
which the Tribunal has had to consider is that the dispatcher was not in the Control
Room at the commencement of the disaster and that his version of events must be
rejected.
The two pumpmen have duties which bring them to different parts of the terminal
including the power-house, the pump-house and the fire-pump room. They were in the
power-house when they were alerted to the emergency by the dispatcher.
The two PPOs on duty are stationed in the security hut at the entrance to Ascon Jetty,
when not patrolling the terminal area. Each P P O would patrol a different route and
would clock in by means of time-clocks at fixed points around the tank farm. They had
two walkie-talkies but on the night of the disaster one was out of action. The PPO on an
inspection tour when the disaster began had no walkie-talkie with him. Where he
actually was is a matter of controversy, and it is suggested that his version of the events
of the emergency should not be accepted. The other P P O was in the security hut at the
time. Whether his walkie-talkie was turned on or not will be considered later in the
Report.
The "Betelgeuse"
Relevant particulars of the "Betelgeuse" will be given in detail in Chapter 15. In this
Chapter reference will be made to those aspects of the vessel which are of particular
relevance to the evideiicp relating to the facts of the disaster.
11,2 A drawing showing tha layout and numbering of the vessel's tanks is reproduced in
Appendix 10. >
It will be seen that there are eighteen cargo tanks. The tanks at the side of the vessel are
referred to as "wing tanks" and those in the centre as "centre tanks".
The No. 4 wing tanks were divided into two parts. Originally the forward parts were used
exclusively for ballast, but in 1974 they were converted so that they could be used for certain
types of cargo. On her last voyage from Ras Tanura no cargo had been put in these tanks,
and one of the issues which the Tribunal has to determine is whether or not they were
ballasted whilst the ship was at Bantry.
These tanks have variously been described as the "permanent ballast tanks" or the " N o . 4 (a)
wing tank" (port or starboard as the case may be). In general the abbreviation PBT will be
used in this Report to describe them. It should, however, be borne in mind that there are
other ballast tanks on the vessel (forward of the No. 1 wing tanks) but these are not relevant
to the facts of the disaster.
As has already been pointed out, the PBTs are about midships on the vessel. It was just
forward of frame 77 (in the PBTs and the No. 4 centre tank) that the vessel broke her back
in the disaster. A second rupture of the vessel occurred in way of the No. 6 tanks. It is agreed
thai an explosion occurred in the port PBT. Total, in their final submission, expressed
loubts to whether such an explosion occurred in the starboard PBT.
On the journey from Ras Tanura the ship had carricd 77,098 metric tonnes of Arab1
Heavy crude and 42,338 metric tonnes of Arabian Light crude. These figures are according
to the ship's manifest. A discrepancy arose between the bills of lading and the terminal
figures, but this discrepancy was not of significance for the purposes of this Inquiry. It had
The Arabian Heavy crude was carried in the No. 1 tanks across, the Nos. 2-5 centre tanks,
and the No. 6 tanks across. This parcel was discharged first and unloading was completed by
the evening of the 7th January. This meant that there was Arabian Light crude still on board
in wing tanks (port and starboard) Nos. 2-5, when the casualty occurred.
The vessel's design is a free-flow one and this means that discharging cargo takes place
tunnel allows free-flow through the PBTs from the No. 3 wing tanks to the No. 4 cargo /
wing tank).
Ballasting direct from the sea into the PBTs was possible by means of valves in the bottom of
the tanks opening directly to the sea. However, ballasting by this means could only be
achieved to sea-level. If further ballast was required the tanks would be "topped up' by use
of the deck wash/fire lines.
There is no doubt that the "Betelgeuse" took on ballast whilst berthed at the jetty, and that
she was ballasting (or had just completed ballasting) at the time of the disaster. One of the
issues which has to be determined by the Tribunal is whettfer she was improperly ballasted,
as a result of which excessive stresses were set up in the vessel. In this connection it will have
to be determined whether ballast was taken into the PBTs on the 7th January.
After the discharge of the parcel of Arabian Heavy crude the1 tanks which had contained this
cargo could have been ballasted. Sea water is drawn in through sea valves in the pump-
room, and then pumped on deck via the cargo pumps and then dropped into Tanks Nos. 2
and 5 from whence the ballast may travel via the bulkhead sluice valves into the other centre
tanks. This is the operation that was being carried out when the disaster occurred. What
quantities of ballast were taken on and into which tanks are matters which are considered in
Chapter 19. For the purpose of considering the evidence relating to the facts of the disaster, it
is to be borne in mind that no transfer operations between the ship and the shore were taking
place when it occurred, and that it happened at a time of inactivity as far as the jetty crew
and the dispatcher at Gulf Control were concerned,
4.1.1 Introduction
This Chapter outlines the principal events of the 6th/7th January which are relevant to this
Inquiry. A number are of very considerable significance to different issues which are
considered in detail in later Chapters.
4.2.3 Mr, Michael Ball and Mr. Michael Harris were cargo inspectors employed by Messrs.
Moore Barrett & Redwood Ltd. They boarded the "Betelgeuse" at 20.05 hours. Their first
task was to check the' amount of cargo against the ship's papers and this involved taking
ullages of all cargo tanks. The figures were then agreed with the Chief Officer and there was
no significant difference in the overall quantity of cargo aboard. Discharge of the Arabian
Heavy began at 23.15 hours.
39
fe.
This evidence is of significance. The possible presence of oil in the Chiksan armf
the time of the disaster will be considered in Chapter 18.
(c) According to the Control Room log the ship began ballasting from the sea at 18.35
hours. Mr. O'Brien confirmed the accuracy of the log.
The matter is discussed further in Chapter 19. The time of the commencement
ballasting is of importance and the Tribunal is satisfied that the time recorded in t i l
log is correct.
(d) At 18.35 the displacing of the bunker line began and at 19.30 hours bunkering itself?
began. Mr. O'Brien understood that the vessel was only taking on a limited amount
of bunkers. At 19.50 Mr. Murnane saw a signal which he took to mean that
bunkering was to stop and he so advised Mr. O'Brien. This, however, was a
misunderstanding and bunkering recommenced and was completed at 20.40 hours,
191 tonnes having been taken on.
(e) Mr. Murnane carried out the routine duties which he was required to perform
according to the Manual. These included a check on the level of fluid in the slop
tank. Everything was in order. At the stage of the Inquiry at which Mr. Murnane
gave evidence (the 22nd day of the oral testimony) the possibility was being actively
pursued by Total's expert witnesses that the slop tank and the vent pipe from the
slop tank were corroded and that flammable vapour could have been emitted from
this source. Mr. Murnane stated that there was nothing wrong with the slop tank or
the vent pipe. This subject is discussed further fn Chapter 18.
(f) At 11.00 hours Captain Phillips was present in the vessel's cargo control room when
a conversation took place between the Master,, the Chief Officer and Captain
Warner, the ship's pilot. Captain Phillips stated that a ballasting programme was
discussed and that a decision was taken by the Master to take on ballast forthwith
into the PBTs. He stated that ballasting of the PBTs began at about 11.30 hours,
This evidence is of considerable importance in the case, as ballast in the PBTs would
have contributed to the sagging condition to which it is suggested the vessel was
subjected. Total submitted that this conversation never took place. The evidence in
this regard is examined in detail in Chapter 19 and the reasons are given why the
Tribunal accepts it.
(g) Mr, O'Sullivan recollected that three or four members of the crew of the
"Betelgeuse" were still on shore when he left the jetty at about 20.00 hours. They
were, in fact, brought back to the vessel by the "Sea Lance" which arrived at
Dolphin 22 at about 23.35 hours that evening. The skipper exchanged greetings
with the PPO on Dolphin 22.
4.3.2 Mr. Ball was the "shore side" man i.e. he stayed at the terminal on Sunday the 7th January
dipping the tanks ashore. Mr. Harris was the "ship man" and he returned to the
"Betelgeuse" to take R.O.B. soundings on board. Mr. Ball went out to the vessel to pick up
Mr. Harris and he recalled that the Chief Officer commented to Mr. Harris that ballasting of
the ship would be finished at about 01.00 hours the following morning.
An arrangement was made that Mr. Harris would return to the "Betelgeuse" before
ballasting was completed and it was proposed that he would travel on the "Donemark",
leaving Bantry Pier at midnight.
This evidence is of considerable significance: firstly, in relation to the time at which the
"Donemark" left the pier at Bantry, and secondly as to the quantity of ballast taken on
board. It will be considered again in Chapter 6 and Chapter 19.
When Mr. Ball and Mr. Harris left the vessel ballasting had started. According to the log of
the "Donemark", they left Dolphin 22 at 18.40 hours. This entry in the log is an accurate
one.
4.3.3 The "Betelgeuse" was visited by two surveyors acting for two different prospective
purchasers of the vessel.
Mr. Tsakos arrived on board the vessel at about 11.30 hours, Mr. Stewart at about 13.35.
Both returned to Bantry at about 18.15 hours.
Mr. Tsakos and Mr. Stewart took photographs of the vessel which were put in evidence, and
they both gave oral evidence relating to their surveys. This evidence is considered in
Chapter 15.
4.3.4 The jetty crew and the pilot were relieved at 20.00 hours. Mr. Tim Kingston took up duty as
P C O ; Mr. James O'Sullivan as jetty foreman; Mr. Denis O'Leary as PPO; Mr. Charles
Brcnnan, Mr. William Shanahan and Mr. Cornelius O'Shea, as utility men. Captain David
Warner at the same time took up duty on board the vessel as ship's pilot.
All perished in the disaster.
•£
jsB*
CHAPTER 5
5.1.1 Introduction
One person claimed to have seen the whole disaster from its commecemcnt—Mr. Connolly, !
the dispatcher on duty on the night of the 7th/8th January who was in the Control Room on
Whiddy Island overlooking the jetty. He stated that he was seated at the control console
observing the jetty and the "Betelgeuse" continuously up to the time the disaster began. If
his evidence is correct then if is possible accurately to ascertain (a) when the disaster began
(b) where it started (c) why it started and (d) its progress. If his evidence is accepted then
Gulf clearly had no responsibility for what happened and none of its employees could have
done anything to minimise the effects of the disaster or save any lives, in the log he kept that
evening he entered the commencement of the casualty as having occurred at 00.55 hours.
Significant parts of his testimony received corroboration,from four of his fellow-employees.
Two of them were on the "Donemark", the personnel hunch which brought Mr. Harris
out to the offshore jetty just before the disaster. Their evidence was to the effect that they
arrived at Dolphin 22 at 00.40 hours (one of them stating that he checked his watch at that
moment); at which time, according to their evidence, there was no sign of any fire. The two
PPOs on duty on the Island also corroborated the dispatcher's version in important details.
The evidence of the dispatcher and four of his colleagues is directly and irreconcilably
contradicted bv a large number of persons who saw or heard the disaster at a time much
earlier than that deposed to by the dispatcher and his colleagues. If the evidence of these eye-
witnesses is correct, then a fire was raging on the ship and the jetty at a time when the
dispatcher says that he was watching the scene continuously and nothing untoward was
happening, and at a time when, according to the crew of the "Donemark". a visitor was
being left at Dolphin 22.
The Tribunal was fortunate in having"available to it a considerable number of witnesses
whose memory was accurate, whose powers of observation were well developed and whose
testimony could be cross-checked with other reliable evidence. With the aid of this evidence
\f it has been possible to ascertain when the disaster began and obtain an accurate description of
'its progress. Tin Tribunal has nir liLSTTaliun in aucpiing"iliis uvidcacu and iLji'Uing fet of
^lllf 1 " ^ ' r " 1 '1| " fpH^.wM-ppl^i n in il m IhHr MMwp WTOU^
'consider^ in p^y'^'' in the next Ch-apter.
5,1.2 In this Chapter, theNgeneral eye-witnesf; evidence will be considered. Included in this
examination will be thkevidence of the t a r d a witnesses whose evidence helps to establish
not only the time of the dkastcr but also tne time at which the dispatcher became aware of it.
The evidence clearly establishes that tha disaster can be divided into three phases. Phase 1
lasted from about 00.31—00.32Shours to ®0.40 hours approximately; Phase 2 lastpd from 00.40
hours until the massive explosion at 0T.06—01.08 hours approximately; and Phase 3 covers
the period from the massive explosion to the final sinking of the vessel.
—Section 1 deals with the evidence of tho^e who witnessed the fire in Phase 1 i.e. from
00.31-00.32 hours approximately^) 00.40 hours approximately.
—-Section A deals with the evidence of those who saw the fjra^arly in its second phase, i.e. at
WJ.40 hours approximately and at 00.45 hpt(fs approximately.
—Section 3 deals with the Garda evidence, the alep^of the emergency services and the time
o f \ h e major explosion,
t \
—Section 4 considers the evidence of tha^'other witnesses who gave evidence concerning
their knowledge of the disaster.
—Section 5 deals w^th the evid^fee of the postmistress on Whiddy Island.
5.1.3 There were a number V f pmtrtTs'on duty on or near the Island on the night of the 7th/8th
January and it is propo^ed'to consider their evidence in the next Chapter. One of them was
Mr. John D o w n e ^ S pinnpman on duty. He gave helpful evidence which will be detailed
later. But papfof his testimony assists in fixing the time of the disaster. It was to the ^ ^ n
followm e f f e c t : ^ 1 > ( I.' J t ' i u ^ >t< /? f M ^ M ) Ofii TfaC A J r $ H T O f
A4S«Bwi*fey was on duty with an assistant pumpman, Mr. McGee, Mr. McGcc had taken
the Land Rover with which Ottcy were supplied and was carrying out routine checks in the
tank farm area. Mr. Downey stayed in the vicinity of the pump-house, the power-house, the
heating plant, the water treatment area and the area of the ballast recovery tank. Having
made routine checks on these parte of the plant, he left the pump-house to go to the power-
house. This journey brought him is full view of the jetty and the ship. He entered the door
of the power-house, walked straigm through the main floor, picked up the power-house
log, wrote the date on it and he entered the time as "00.30". Before entering the particulars
of the time as being 00.30 hours he Yhecked his watch (which he was satisfied was an
accurate timekeeper) and quite definitely, recalls recording the time from it. He was satisfied
that "only seconds" had elapsed from theSfime he first entered the power-house to the time
he made the log entry.
Mr. Downey was quite certain that at the t i m \ h e entered the power-house everything at the
jetty and on the ship was normal. Thus his evidence, which is completely acceptable, quite
definitely establishes that the fire must have commenced sometime after 00.29 hours on the
morning of the 8th of January.
\
•-aft^H ' m T /-A -fc. T A V
JCL11U1N 1 \
The first phase of, the disaster: 00.31 hours \ approximately to 00.40 hours
approximately. \
The t^jtimcny • i r '' c t 'nrMklii-hinp- Apr? nf rVip Pn ]• liin .ifiln- dinnum-
43
the lounge and went into the kitchen. She was preparing to boil a kettle and had just pu
on when her husband called out from the west bedroom "It is a fire there". She p u t |
kettle on the AgiVooker and followed her husband through the french windows of t
lounge and into the garden. When Mrs. O ' C o n n o r got on to the terraCe outside the fren^
windows she saw qie fire. She is quite certain it was on the tanker. Sh/described it as "no
very big" when shV first saw it, but she and her husband went d o w n to a rock which"l
situated in their garden about 30 or 40 yards (27 or 36 m) from their house to get a bette
view of the fire. She^could see the tanker clearly (it was, she said, a "beautiful moonlight
night") and the fire was to the right of the centre of the tanker. The fire was still not verv
big (she expressed the View that the fire then was of "manageable proportions") but as she
was looking at it "suddenly there was a roar like wind and the flame went to the left-hand
side of the tanker right\across it."
She described the event ^ a "big flash". When this happend Mrs. O ' C o n n o r ran off the
rock back into the house, fii the house she decided to ring the Glengarriff Exchange to raise
the alarm and she picked lip the phone and spoke to the operator, Mrs. O'Sullivan.
Obviously it is important to\cstablish the time at which Mrs. O ' C o n n o r telephoned Mrs.
O'Sullivan as this would help\to establish the duration of the first phase of the fire. In this
connection Mrs. O'Sullivan's evidence is helpful. She places the call from Mrs. O ' C o n n o r at
between 00.40 and 00.45 hours, ^he had a friend visiting her home that evening. She recalls
that when he got up to leave she looked at her clock and the time was 00.30 hours. Her
husband went to the hall door with their visitor and stayed talking there with him for
"nearly ten minutes". When he came in he remarked "we'are going to have a busy time in
the phone because we heard thundei\ while we were at the door". He went to the back door
of the kitchen and returned after ^ m i n u t e and said "it looks very strange" and Mrs.
O'Sullivan went out and saw a red glow which seemed to be flickering. She thought it must
be the aurora borealis but her husband, thought that it was a fire and said he would go to
look elsewhere. Just as Mrs. O'Sullivan returned the telephone rang and it was Mrs.
O'Connor on the line reporting the fire which she had seen. Mrs. O'Sullivan thinks this was
between 00.40 and 00.45 hours. \
It is clear, however, that the time of Mrs\ O'Connor's call must have been very close to
00.40 hours. Mrs. O'Connor could not be e^act as to the length of time she was out of the
house and on the rock looking at the fire, antfishe is not of course in any way to be criticised
for this, but she thought that it could havo. been for about six or seven minutes. She
remembers quite clearly that the kettle was not foiling when she returned to the kitchen and
that she then decided to ring the Glengarriff Exchange. She explained that the fire in the
Aga cooker is low at night and that she would no\ expect the kettle to boil in 4 or 5 minutes
as it would do normally. This evidence would tend to establish that the dramatic spread of
the fire along the tanker (the beginning of the second phase of the disaster) occurred in the
region of 00.40 hours and not any later. This is consistent with evidence of other witnesses.
Mr. O'Connor remembers quite clearly that the time n^ returned home was 00.30 hours. He
heard what he recalls as a "rumbling" outside which seemed to be prolonged, and it was like
"muffled thunder" and he drew the curtains of the french windows of the lounge. He saw a
red glow in the sky from the direction of Whiddy. He went from there to the w i n d o w of
the west bedroom to get a better view. From there he wasV^uite definite that there was a fire
"on the Island". Not only did he see a glow but he saw flames as well " w i t h yellow tips".
He then went out to the garden and down to the rock from which he could see the fire quite
plainly. He was quite definite that the fire was on the tanker Vnd not the jetty^He said it was
in the centre of the tanker. He thought it was not a small Vire and that in an instant "it
seemed to go the whole length of the tanker". Mr. O ' C o n n o r ' s recollection of the time he
saw the fire and the length of time he was looking at it before inspread was not accurate. But
his evidence is helpful in two respects. It confirms that the disaster commenced at shortlv
after 00.30 hours, that the commencement of the fire was accompanied by a continuous
rumbling sound like thunder, and that the fire was on the ship (st its centre) and not on the
jetty. \
Mrs. O'Connor's evidence is principally of importance in relation\to the first phase of the
disaster. But it is also helpful in confirming other evidence in relation to the second phase.
After Mrs. O'Connor had talked to Mrs. O'Sullivan she was put through to the Glengarriff
Garda Station, where she alerted the sergeant's wife to the disaster. She then went back to
the garden. By then the fire had spread and was "huge" ,and "frightening". She had
expressed the opinion that even after the sudden spread of the fire that it was in her opinion
"manageable". It is clear that even after the fire had sprca'd there was an interval of time
before it otvcloped into a major conflagration. This supports the evidence of the pumpman,
Mr. Downey, which will be considered in the next chapter, as well as other eye-witness
evidence toVhe early part of the second phase of the disaster.
Mr. Holland was in bed when nis wife went to the window and first noticed the fire. He got
up immediately and looked for Himself. He cannot say what time it was when he first saw
the fire. The evidence of these Y/itnesses does not help in establishing the time of the
outbreak of the fire. But it is of considerable assistance in describing the nature of the fire in
its first phase, as it is clear that Mr m d Mrs, Holland saw the fire whilst it was localised and
before it had spread. Mr. Holland s\id that when he first saw it the blaze "seemed to be
coming out of the hold in the centrc\of the tanker, more to the front, but I could see the
gunwales on both sides". It was more to the front of the tanker than the centre. It appeared
to be small "as if it was a Cortina car b l u i n g " . He insisted that he could see the ship plainly
and that the fire was in the centre of it. As he was watching the fire it got bigger, slowly at
first. Then when it got to a certain size it suddenly spread at an "awful pace . . . all over the
tanker". Clearly what Mr. Holland was describing was the same scene which Mr. and Mrs.
O'Connor had witnessed, (see: Paragraph 2).
Mrs. Holland was of the same opinion as her Vusband as to the position of the fire when she
first saw it. She was satisf?ed that the fire was a Small one when she first saw it and that it was
on the deck of the ship and a bit forward of the Centre of the ship. She, too, thought the size
of the fire when she first saw it was that as ifV motor car was on fire.
,.5 The evidence of Mr. Aidan Vaughan, Mrs. Sheila Vaughan and Mr. Richard
Brennan \
Mr. and Mrs. Vaughan were amongst the first of those to see the fire on the night of the
disaster. Their evidence helps to confirm that it started shortly after 00.30 hours. Although
their view of it was not as good as that of other witnesses, they can confirm that in the first
phase the fire was a small one. Mrs. Vaughan is able to confirm that an explosion took place
at approximately 00.50 hours. \
These witnesses live at Droumaclarig, Bantry. On Sunday evening, the 7th January, they
were visiting Mrs. Vaughan's mother who lived at CSengarriff. They had their ten-month-
old son with them. Just as they were leaving to retuVn home Mrs. Vaughan checked the
clock in her mother's house and her own watch and shit remembers that the time was 00.20
hours, as she recalled thinking that it was late to have heit baby out. Mr. Vaughan recalls her
saying "It's twenty past twelve, we should go home". Tney then left, taking the coast road
back in the Ballylickey direction. When they were closit to the Green Acres Hotel Mrs.
Vaughan noticed a glow in the sky to which she drew herViusband's attention. He stopped
tihe car, reversed it a short distance and when it stopped they both saw a fire at Whiddy
Island. In Mr, Vaughan's view "it was a small flame". He said that from the distance from
which he was "it appeared to me to be six foot high and in the shape of a pyramid, three
foot wide and six foot high coming to a point". They remained there for about two minutes
and thers moved down to the Green Acres Hotel from which they had a better view. The
fire thenVtarted to get bigger and smoke started to rise in the shape of a mushroom. Mr.
Vaughan thought that they remained there for about ten minutes and then they set off to
drive to tha home of Mr. Brennan, who was living not far away in Kilkeel. Mrs. Vaughan
also expresses the view that the fire was very small when first she saw it. She estimated that
they stayed about ten minutes at Green Acres Hotel looking at the fire during which time it
was getting bigrger. They could not be certain (which indeed is not surprising, in view of the
location from which they were observing the fire) where exactly it was situated.
Mr. and Mrs. Vaughan thought that they saw the fire before 00.30 hours. They base this
estimate on the fafit (a) that they left Glengarriff after noting that the time was 00.20 hours
and (b) that it would take about 7 or 8 minutes to reach the point on the road, near the small
church at Snave, at Vhich they first saw the fire. But it is quite possible that they may not
fully have taken into\ccount the time it took them to get into their car after noticing the
lateness of the hour, and their evidence is not necessarily irreconcilable with that of Mr.
Downey who establishes\hat the fire was not in existence at 00.29 hours. But in view of the
distance they had travelleaSthe time must have been very shortly after 00.30 hours when they
first saw the fire, and their evidence is consistent with that of Mrs. and Mr. O'Connor which
places the beginning of the (disaster very close to 00.30 hours.
Support for the view that MX and Mrs. Vaughan saw the fire at about 00.30 hours is
obtained from the evidence of M^. Brennan. Having watched the fire for some time Mr. and
Mrs. Vaughan drove to Mr. Brenrian's house. He remembers being awakened by a noise at
the window and that he looked at rajs watch and saw that it was 00.45 hours. He then looked
out of his window and saw "the wHble sky on fire". He got dressed and travelled with the
Vaughans back to Green Acres. Fromythere Mr. Brennan saw that Dolphin 22 and "west of
it was just a mass of flames". "The sky", he said, "was full of black, very thick, black
smoke". It is clear, therefore, that aboutVifteen minutes could have elapsed from the time the
Vaughans first saw the fire to the time\they knocked at Mr. Brennan's window.
Mrs. Vaughan's testimony assists on another aspect of the disaster. She remembers waiting in
the car whilst her husband went to fetch MV Brennan. Just as her husband and Mr. Brennan
were returning an explosion occurred. Th\s was the first explosion that they heard that
evening. It would seem that this explosion must have occurred at about 00.50 hours and it
could well have been the explosion described by the Deardens as a "whooshing sound"
which Mrs. Dearden said occurred at 00.50 houts. That an explosion occurred at this time is
borne out by other testimony, and will be considered again when the evidence of the
pumpman on the Island, Mr. Downey, is beinAdiscussed (see: paragraph 6.2.1).
As to the interval which had elapsed from hearing the unusual sound to the time when she
looked through the corridor window (00.40 houre) she said that "only minutes" elapsed. She
agreed that in a written statement which she had made to the Gardai she had estimated that
"approximately ten minutes" had elapsed but she stated in evidence that it would not have
been this length of time. She expressed the opiniomthat the fire must have started a "few
minutes" before she saw it.
This evidence establishes that by 00.40 hours the fire Was $ large one. It was at that time
accompanied by a "tremendously high" column of smoke which had obviously travelled
some distance from the scene of the disaster as it was seen Vy Nurse Elphick when she looked
through the window of the sluice room. This window faces in a north-easterly direction and
not directly over Whiddy Island and the smoke must have travelled some distance to permit
her to see it from this position. Her evidence shows that the fire must have started some
appreciable time before 00.40 hours and is consistent with the evidence that it started shortly
after 00.30 hours.
5.2.8 The evidence o f Miss Mary Holland
Miss Holland had been at a dance in the West Lodge^Hotel. She was sitting in her car in the
forecourt of the hotel when she noticed two unujidal happenings. She noticed fit-stly some
members of the Garda Siochana running in tWIorecourt as if there was an emergency—a
piece of evidence which is corroborated amK-xplained by the evidence of Garda Byrne and
Garda Joy. She then noticed smoke coming from the Whiddy direction. She first thought
that the smoke was coming from a fin^in a hayshed. In a few seconds, however, it appeared
to be very black smoke and there w^as a great deal of it. She looked at her watch and recalls
that the time was nearly twentwfive to one (00.35 hours). She decided to drive down to the
beach road to get a better vk>w of the fire and she drove down to "the Beaches" (part of the
coast just beyond the airstrip and which is close to Whiddy Island). From there she could see
the glow of the fire but not the fire itself. She saw when she got there—a distance of
miles (2,4 km) from/fhe hotel approximately—a lot of smoke travelling in the direction of
Ballylickey. A slight discrepancy exists between the oral evidence of this witness and the
statement whi^n she made to the Gardai on the 19th January. In her written statement she
said that thp^time she first saw the fire was "12.38 a.m." (i.e. 00.38 hours). The discrepancy
is, however, a minor one, and in no way affects the conclusion that this witness saw a fire at
or cloJr to 00.35 hours. Her view of the location of the fire was, however, obscured by the
w r J>*K£ r*B ^ ^
1
TJUl Tii il lilil I "lln Ti il iiiiil i i in lin i n i r
The disaster began very shortly after 00.30 hours, in the region of 00.31-00.32 hours. When
it began it was accompanied by sounds like distant thunder. At its commencement the fire
appeared to be a small one and localised just forward of the centre of the ship, but gradually
increased in intensity. It was accompanied by a large plume of smoke. Its transition to the
second phase was sudden and dramatic. The fire was seen to spread aft along the whole
length of the tanker. This happened at about 00.40 hours.
SECTION 2
The second phase of the disaster: 00.40 hours approximately to 01.06-01.08 hours
The evidence of the witnesses \Uiich will mm be considered: SCfftS-WTth^eae who first saw
the fire at about 00.40 hours, It tejclear that these witnesses saw the fire when it had reached
its second phase, that is to say, when it was no longer a small fire but had spread
considerably. From the evidence now considered it is clear that the fire was on the sea at
both sides of the ship from about 00.40 hours onwards. T.hu evidence of thoso who i m r r h e
fire feom no 45 oryr-ird- "-ill then-be "-tri'l'TM
The second phase lasted dntil 01.08 hours when the massive explosion occurred. Evidence
it /"nri-irlrrrrd lntn- clearly establishes that this explosion occurred in way of the No. 6
tanks and the No. 5 centre tank. The second phase was accompanied by a number of
explosions, one of which—at about 00.50 hours—resulted in a very considerable increase in
the intensity of the fire (see paragraph 6.2.2). Other evidence,««hiih will be Lomidcmd
lafwr establishes that these explosions did not take place in the vessel but outside it. fanthci
nf thf sernnd phnrr m i T -l-i iiiv i j ; n "' 1 n™ "'lii n h '"ill l , n " ii• i 1 'i 1f l in tfr n n n t
chapur.
49
at the lateness of the hour because she had an early start the following morning.'
down in bed and as she had some pins in her hair she was uncomfortable and decided {
up to take them out.»As she did so she pulled back the curtain and saw the fire out 1
Bay. The fire was a big one with smoke rising to the left going towards Bantry. She cf
not see what was on fire but it looked like the tanker.
Mr. O'Mahony was oozing when he was awakened by his wife. He got out of
immediately and looked at the clock which was beside him. It was a little after 00.40—4
clock had not reached 00.45. He saw the fire which he thought was "to the right of!
offshore jetty". The nigh^ was a very clear one and he had a perfect view of the terminf
The wind was negligible* The witness could not be certain whether the fire was on f
tanker or on the jetty. He ^iad the impression that the fire was not on the sea when he fir|
saw it but could not be certain about this. The witness went into the garden and watched tH
flame and smoke from there,^He witnessed the major explosion. "A vast white sheet of flam-
soared into the sky and at thak stage the floor under my feet shook and the window shook!'.
The flames then spread to the, north. The impression which the witness had was that the.
whole length of the tanker, w^ich the witness thought was at right angles to the jetty, was
then completely on fire. After that explosion there were continuous creaking and tearing
sounds which he had not heard, before the explosion took place.
Dr. and Mr. O'Mahony had bee A under the impression that the tanker had been moored at
right angles to the jetty, and thev\ thought that what they were looking at was the whole
length of the tanker on fire. After the major explosion there were continuous creaking
sounds and tearing sounds which Mr. O'Mahony had not heard before the explosion took
place. (
i t
Mr. and Mrs, O'Mahony were, in fa&t, looking at the stern of the vessel from a distance of
over four miles. It was therefore veAy difficult for them to describe or know the exact
location of the fire. But their testimony ys of considerable importance in establishing the time
of the second phase of the fire. It is clean that when they saw the fire it was a little after 00.40
and before 00.45 hours. The fire was then in its second phase. Both saw a " b i g " fire, a
"substantial" fire. Doctor O'Mahony continued watching it from the window and whilst
she cannot be sure, she considered that the fire did not change until after the big explosion.
The fire seen by these witnesses was of different dimensions to the "small fire' described by
the witnesses in Section 1 of this chapter. Clearly, they were looking at the second phase of
the disaster. Their evidence helps in confirming that the second phase began in the region of
00.40 hours,
\
\
^
5.3.3 The evidence of Mr. John Crowley
Mr. and Mrs. Crowley were visiting friends (tl^ O'Sheas) in Gorties at a place known as
Bay View Farm. Mr. Crowley recalls that the programme on television had come to an end
and the set was switched off. Mr. Crowley looked at his watch and the time was 00.35. As
they were standing up to leave a member of the family turned on the dishwasher. It was a
new one and it was decided to wait and see how\it performed.
As he was standing waiting to leave, someone pulledy curtain aside and saw the fire at the
jetty. Mr. Crowley immediately went to the window and saw the fire. He estimates that the
time was then about 00.40 hours. \
From the window he could see the stern of the tanker. He saw a "saddle of fire" midway on
the vessel and on both sides of it. He could see the to^s of the flames coming over the
superstructure of the tanker on occasions. It didn't look "terribly big" when he first saw it.
He saw a column of smoke, very high, black and dense ancf^rising at an angle of about forty-
five degrees.
Mr. Crowley immediately drove to his home at Relane Poinjt, a distance of some five miles
from his friend's house. His route brought him through the town of Bantry and out past the
West Lodge Hotel. As he was going through the town he noticed the Garda patrol car
outside the Garda Station, and he could see the column of smoloe passing over the town. His
home is 160 feet (49 m) above sea level and he had a clear view of the jetty. The fire was
much stronger at the time he reached his home. After he got out of his car a "vicious"
cxplosiorfsoccurred, the effects of which he actually felt and which caused his dog to roll
over on t h \ ground.
This witness observed the fire just after the disaster had entered its second phase. The fire was
not then very\great, but it was both on the ship and on the sea on both sides of it.
The view which these witnesses hac^ was of the stern of the tanker. It was clearly visible
when they stopped the car. There was, Mr. Fitzgerald said, a very bright background, and
he saw balls of smoke and a "massive\irc". He could see that the sea was on fire on both
sides of the main fire, but mainly between the jetty and the shore. Mr. O'Shea thought that
the fire was around the accommodation a'ica of the ship, and that it was getting worse by the
second. The fire "seemed to pour over flpe side of the ship" and it was on the sea. The
witnesses stayed about three minutes at Green Acres and then drove to Bantry Pier. Mr.
Fitzgerald remembers hearing a number of Janall explosions whilst he was at the Pier and
heard what he described as a "massive" explosion at 01.07 hours. He was able to state the
time of the massive explosion with accuracy because Mr. O'Shea looked at his watch when
it occurred and told him the time.
51
went to the front door of his house at a time which he estimates was 00.30 hours. The5
then nothing unusual to be seen. He returned indoors and finished his coffee. He th$
to the front door for a second time. When he opened it he immediately saw a fire. He c4
his brother and he looked at his watch. The time was then 00.40 hours. W h e n he first
sag
he thought the fireywas at a neighbour's house. At that time the sky was "pretty red
there was black smoke hovering straight over his house. He went to a field behind his ho'
to get a better viewsof the fire and at 00.50 hours approximately drove to Ardaturl
Mr. Wiseman's evidence is obviously accurate and confirms the existence of the fire at ODt
hours.
Mr. O'Leary remembers his daughter coming into his bedroom, waking him up and saying
"Daddy, there is something wrong with Gulf. It is on fire". Mr. O'Leary jumped out of bed
and as he did so he checked his watch and the time was "practically a quarter to one". He
looked out the window and he could see smoke and flame. From his window he could see
the tanker ana. the centre platform of the jetty. There was fairly intense smoke which
"seemed to come out of one patch". The fire seemed to be contained in one area and the
smoke appeared ro be coming from somewhere around the manifold of the ship. When he
first saw the fire thine was no question of it spreading the length of the ship and it was in the
area of the centre pktform. He immediately got dressed and went with his son to a field at
the back of the house\a few hundred yards away to get a better view of the fire. At first the
smoke was not heavy,unit as the minutes went by, both the smoke and the flames increased.
The smoke still blockeo\his vision and he decided to travel down to the sea level going in the
direction of a small rocft, off the Island known as "Carrigacloash". When he got down to
sea-level the fire was veny extensive. "The whole area was covered in flame". He was,
however, only there for a few seconds when the big explosion occurred. He was stunned by
it for a couplc of minutes. l\ caused debris to fall around him. He was "absolutely terrified"
by the explosion. He returned to his house and collected his family to evacuate the Island.
The witness was positive that irom the time he was awoken at no time did he hear the siren
on the Control building or on me jetty. The witness could not be sure whether the fire was
on the centre platform or whether it was on the ship. He estimated that it would have taken
him about six or seven minutes tA get to the hill from which he observed the smoke, and
about the same time again to get to. the position on the shore from which he observed the
major conflagration. He estimated the big explosion as having occurred between five and
ten past one.
Mrs. O'Learv corroborated her husbancKs testimony in relation to the time he was awoken.
In addition she gave evidence of a telephone call from the postmistress in the post office. This
call came after her husband had got dressed and left. She could not be certain as to the exact
time but she checked later with the postmistress in the post office who told her that she had
booked the call to her at one o'clock. The message she got from the postmistress was to the
effect that Mr. Connolly had telephoned andlae wanted the men collected to go down and
help fight the fire. As to the siren, she said she would hear the siren on the terminal when it
went off but she did not hear it on the nightVf the disaster.
It is of relevance to note that Mrs. O'Leary was qdoted in the public press of 11th January as
stating that her daughter^liad seen the fire at 00.45 nours and that, notwithstanding the fact
that Mr. O'Leary was an employee of Gulfs, no effost was made by Gulf to contact him and
to obtain a statement from him or any member of\his family—a matter which will be
adverted to again in paragraph 8.5.6.
53
The evidence o f Mr. Peter Tynan O'Mahony and Mr. Jack O'Shea
Mr. Tynan O'Mahony is a journalist. On the night of the disaster he was staying!
bungalow owned by friends of his at Ardaturrish. The bungalow is about two hundred 1
(61 m) above sea-level and affords an excellent view of the jetty and tankers berthed
He had noticed th^tanker at 11.00 hours on the morning of Sunday the 7th January I
described her as "ramshackle" and as "looking rusty" and recalls that at 16.00 hours ir
afternoon she had risen a bit in the water. He went out later in the evening, returning to
bungalow at about 23.w0 hours. He had some supper sitting on a sofa and then went to 1
diningroom table and saKpn a chair in the middle of the room. The curtains on the windov
of the room were fully open. There were two big windows about fifteen inches (381 mnil
off the ground and six feetYl.8 m) high. As he was working at the diningroom table (witra
his back about three quarters turned away from the window) he heard a noise—a thumps
which was followed within ren or twenty seconds by a second very noticeable thump. He
looked up and turned around and looked out the window and immediately saw that the ship
was on fire. What be saw was & very big fire and as he saw it it seemed "to go east". It was;
big light and it seemed to move very quickly east. He picked up binoculars and then saw
that the fire seemed to be in the\centre of the ship. The fire was oblong and the flame was
running east in an oblong on theVsea as well. The flames were on the sea between him and >
the ship and there was a trail of flime behind the ship. There was then a lot of smoke rising
very quickly and in the smoke itself there were plumes of flame reaching up suddenly very
high. He had two cameras with h i m \ n the room at the time. He picked up the camera with
black and white film in it and opened the door to go out. As soon as he did there was a
volume of noise, crackling and rumbling and "almost a hiss a/ well". Over a period of two
minutes he took a sequence of four films\He then decided to try to take colour photographs
and went back to the house, obtained the itinera with colour film in and came out again. He
then took three shots.
He then decided to visit a friend of his, a neighbour, Mr. O'Shea. Before leaving the house
he turned off the light and as he was going through the veranda the radio was still on and he
heard the BBC 1 o'clock news come on the air. He does not carry a watch and working
back from the radio signal at 01.00 hours he estimated that he first saw the fire at "about a
quarter to one or ten to one". The drive to his friend's house would take about three
minutes. He aroused him and estimated that possfyily eight to ten minutes had elapsed from
the time he left his own house to the time of the tijajor explosion which he witnessed from
his friend's house. This was a huge flame, with a Very white core of light, followed by a
huge explosion which the witness found terrifyiftg. Mr. O'Mahony took two further
photographs from Mr. O'Shea's house after the bia explosion.
Mr. Jack O'Shea recalls being awakened by his friendyMr. O'Mahony. He got dressed and
dashed downstairs. He went to look to see what the fire^was like and proceeding about forty
yards he had an unobstructed view. He saw a raging firV with heavy black smoke. He then
went into the house to try to telephone and the big explosion occurred when he was on the
telephone waiting for the Bantry Exchange to answer, rais recollection is that when first
alerted he did not wish to turn on the light as there was a small baby in the bedroom and he
looked at his watch which has a luminous dial and has\ "the impression" that it was
approximately ten to one. Obviously in the light of Mr. Tyram O'Mahony's testimony the
witness's recollection as to the time when he was alerted isVnot an accurate one.
Mr. Tynan O'Mahony confirms that certainly by 00.50 hours tne fire was a very substantial
one. It was then in its second phase. It is quite possible that theVthumps" which he heard
were explosions. His evidence also establishes that in the early part of the second phase the
fire had spread to the water on the starboard side of the vessel.
An expert Gulf witness calculated from the photographs taken by Mr. O'Mahony that at the
time they were taken (at 00.50 hours approximately) the fire extended for 750 metres. He
expressed the opinion (prefacing it by stating that it was not a precise one) that it would
have taken ten or fifteen minutes for the oil to have spread to the extent shown in the
photograph, and in the calculations he made he assumed that the incident must have
commenced at about 00.40 hours (notwithstanding Gulfs dispatcher's evidence and the
evidence of the crew of the "Donemark" to the contrary). Accepting the limitations of the
opinion, it is nonetheless obvious that the oil from the tanker must have spread a very
considerable distance when the photograph was taken and the photograph is strongly
supportive evidence that the tanker must have broken her back at least ten or fifteen minutes
before it was taken.
5.3.12 The evidence of Mr. Vivian O'Callaghan and Mrs. Eijfen O'Callaghan
Mr. O'Callaghan lives in the Bantry Bay Hotel in Wolfe Tone Square near the waterfront.
In the aarly hours of the morning of the 8th of January a ring came to the hall door. When
he answered it he was asked by a friend, Mr, O'Donoghue, " D o you realise there is a fire on
the Island^". He went into the middle of the Square and he could see quite clearly that there
was a fire on the Island and, he then thought, the tank farm. It was then "a very substantial
fire". He estimated that when he first saw the fire the time was 00.45 hours. His estimate is
based firstly oil the fact that he had checked the time previously at 00.30 hours, and secondly
because he recalls being in the Square for about fifteen minutes before the clock in the
Square sounded-pne o'clock. Mr. O'Callaghan's estimate of the time obtains confirmation
from the evidence of Mrs. O'Callaghan (Mr. O'Callaghan's mother) who remembers the
ring at the door and remembers that her son had said to her a little time before it "it is a
quarter to one anmit is time we were all in bed long ago".
Whilst Mr. O'Callaghan did not check his watch when he first saw the fire it would appear
to be probable that saw it first very close to 00.45 hours.
5.3.13 The evidence of Mrs. ^llen Shanahan and Mr. Denis O'Leary
Mrs. Ellen Shanahan lives aMUarraha on Whiddy Island. On the night of the 7th of January
she went visiting her nephew at Bishop Lucey Place in the town of Bantry. She left her
nephew's house (with Mr. ano\Mrs. Michael O'Leary and Mr. and Mrs. Denis O'Leary) at
"about twenty or twenty-five t \ one". They walked in the direction of "Cove Strand". As
she was going there she saw smokfc coming from the direction of Whiddy. She estimates that
this was about three or four minutes after she had left her nephew's house. Later she saw-
flames in the smoke.
Mr. Denis O'Leary thinks that he left Bishop Lucey Place at about "twenty-five to one". He
said that they had been walking for "about five minutes or so" and that as they came down
Cove Road he saw smoke coming frormthe direction of the Island. They travelled across to
the Island and as they were doing so M ^ O'Leary heard a small explosion and it was then
that he first saw fire in the sky.
Although these witnesses^ estimate as to thit time of the fire is an approximate one, none the
less their evidence establishes the existence\of a fire at 00.45 hours.
is evidence confirms that at 00.45 hours, approximately, the firt: was on the water and that
^was spreading to both sides of the jetty, but more towards the Inland than to the starboard
" of the vessel.
55
15 Miss Anne Creedon and Mr. Joseph Ring
Miss Creedon a school teacher by occupation. On the night of the 7th/8th Janua
drove in her car
c\v with Mr. Joseph Ring to the West Lodge Hotel with the intentii
attending a dan^e there. She stopped outside the hotel and listened to the band for a
but she and her Companion decided not to go to the dance. She looked at her watch as<
were leaving and remarked to Mr. Ring that the time was 12.20. Mr, Ring confirmed:
Miss Creedon's recollection in this regard was accurate.
They drove first to\Miss Creedon's house. This is situated at Dromleigh South (in the s®
area as that of Mr. yan Os). The journey took them about ten minutes. When the car ^
stopped outside her Iqome, Miss Creedon heard a rumbling sound which she took to
thunder. She asked Mr. Ring whether he thought it was thunder. He recalls this rem!
being made. Mr. Ring\also recalls hearing a thundering noise, and Miss Creedon decid
that she would drive him back to town. He thought that they had been talking for abo
three or four minutes wh6fi first he noticed the thunder. When Mr. Ring first heard
thought to be thunder he looked in the direction of Whiddy and saw that the sky was rel.
Before Miss Creedon droveXback to town, he decided to get out of the car. He then noticeif
that there was a blaze in the \ k y in the direction of Whiddy. He also noticed smoke. It was?
very high in the sky.
The estimates of time which these witnesses gave were based on the fact that they had left
the West Lodge Hotel at 00.20 Hours. When they got to the town of Bantry they saw Garda ;
Byrne emerging from a shop ana going to the squad car. Miss Creedon spoke to him and
learnt that the fire was on Whidav Island. She thought thats'thc time she met Garda Byrne
was 00.40 hours approximately, bite she is obviously inaccurate in this estimation, as Garda
Byrne had been at the West Lodge Hotel and did not leave it until 00.45, and he had
returned to the Garda Station beforeNhe met Miss Creedon and Mr. Ring in the town. This
inaccuracy, however, does not justify si rejection of all the evidence of these witnesses. Their
evidence helps to corroborate the othet evidence in the case which establishes that the fire
was a very large one by 00.45 hours.
Miss Creedon gave evidence of making a\telephone call from a public phone box and
overhearing (by accident) a caller on the Ime saying "This is Whiddy Island, send fire
brigades and ambulances". It is not possible to know who exactly was making this call, but
as she heard it after her meeting with Garda Byrne it was made some considerable time after
the first alert from the Island had occurred.
SECTION 3
4.1 The Garda evidence: the alerting of the ekiergency services: the time o f the major
explosion
This section considers the Garda evidence as to v&hen and how they were first alerted to the
disaster, the alert of the fire brigade service, and the time of the major explosion. This major
explosion figures prominently in the account of th<» disaster given by many witnesses, and it
is possible to fix the time of its occurrence to withii) two minutes. There were a number of
explosions heard in the course of the disaster, but as \he major explosion (which occurred at
01.06—01.08 hours) was accompanied simultaneously! by the sound of the fire siren in the
town of Bantry it is possible to identify it with precisiton when it is referred to in the course
of a witness's testimony. \
\
4.2 Garda Flynn had come on duty at midnight on the m^ht of the 7th/8th January. He was
sitting in the Garda Station in Bantry reading a newspaper. The thought crossed his mind
that things were "nice and quiet" and he checked his witch and recalls that it was about
00.40 hours when he did so. Shortly after this Mr, Vincent Keane arrived at the Station in an
excited condition and called to Garda Flynn to come out to see the fire. He .went to the front
door of the Station and looked towards the installations on Whiddy Island and he could see a
fire in that direction and smoke going up into the sky. He could just see over the hill and
could make out a brightness rather than flames. He discussed ^ith Vincent Keane where the
fire might be and Mr. Keane expressed the view that the fire r^ust be at the oil installation.
\
Garda Flynn decided to check and see if there was any news and he went back to the Garda
Station and put a call through to the Bantry Exchange. He asked the operator for Whiddv
Island Control and the operator said that "all lines to Whiddy were open" which the
witness took to mean that the lines were engaged. Garda Flynn said to the operator "I think
there is something wrortg out in Whiddy" and the operator replied "I think there is: they
are trying to make contact with Mr. Ash". The witness was satisfied that the operator to
whom he was talking was Mr. Kevin Lynch, who is known to Garda Flynn personally.
Garda Flynn put down tnp phone and went out again to look at the fire. The fire was still
raging so he returned to \he Garda Station and made contact with the squad car. Garda
Flynn estimates that he made the telephone call to the Bantry Exchange at 00.45 hours. The
evidence of Garda Flynn is corroborated by the evidence of Mr. Keanc. He was a member of
the Bantry Fire Brigade ancnearly on Monday the 8th of January he was travelling down
Wolfe Tone Square in Bantr\\with Mr. and Mrs. Gerard O'Donoghue. As he was doing so
he saw a lot of smoke coming\ from over Whiddy and a glow in the sky. He thought that
what he saw was a fire on tanl^ five. The smoke was very heavy and it was high in the sky
and it was then reaching the lAainland from the Island. As he was passing the Station he
stopped the car and decided to feo in to see if he could get any news from the Gardai. He
estimates the time that this happ^ied as being "approximately 12.45". He saw Garda Flynn
in the Station and when Garda Rlynn had seen the fire he recalled that he returned to the
Station to telephone. He recalled fliat Garda Flynn stated to him that he had been in contact
with Mr. Kevin Lynch who wasUware of the emergency on the Island.
In view of the very serious conflict of evidence in the case between the Gulf and other
versions of the disaster this evidence is of crucial importance. Neither Garda Flynn's
accuracy nor honesty was impugned\in any way (Gulfs attack on the veracity of the Garda
evidence was confined to that giveinby Garda Joy and Garda Byrne). Indeed it would be
verv difficult to do so with any conviction as the fact that he called the Bantry Exchange,
the message he was given, and the time it took place were all confirmed by independent
testimony. This evidence establishes tl\at the dispatcher at Gulf Control was aware of the
disaster at approximately 00.45 hours,\and that at that time efforts were being made to
contact Gulfs manager by phone. \
Garda joy and Garda Byrne were on dut\\in the squad car. At about 23.00 hours on Sunday
the 7th of January they had been patrolling close to Bantry town at a place called Seafield,
which is on the sea-front opposite the lodge leading to the back entrance of Bantry House,
when they came across a drowning accident. Having investigated the accident, they
returned to the Station'and left the Station vugain at 00.20 hours to go to the West Lodge
Hotel to carry out further investigation into\he tragedy. There was a dance in progress in
the hotel. They left the car park but were called back to the entrance of the hotel as a
visitor's car had been damaged by a person apparently under the influence of drink. Garda
Byrne returned to the hotel to make contact with the owner of the damaged car. As he did
so he checked the time and remembers that it was 00.40 hours. Having made contact with
the owner of the car he left the dance hall to go ta the squad car. As he was doing so he saw
the fire and black smoke. As he got to the car tiarda Joy said to him "come on—it is
Whiddy". Garda Byrne checked his watch for a sqcond time just as he was getting into the
car and the time was then 00.45 hours.
When Garda Byrne had gone into the hotel Garda Jew remained outside and endeavoured to
keep the person suspected of damaging the car in the\patrol car. The suspect got out and as
Garda Byrne was endeavouring to put him back intc the patrol car he looked and saw a
glow in the sky over the hill directly opposite the hotel. It was a massive glow and he saw
thick black smoke. He immediately got on to the radio and as he was going to the
microphone a call came through from the Station and Garda Flynn said "Whiddy is on
fire . Garda Joy replied "I have seen it: we will return \traight away". Just as he stated this
. Garda Byrne arrived and they set off immediately for tl\c Station. Garda Joy recalls Garda
' Byrne remarking that the time was a quarter to one. WhAi Garda Joy entered the Station he
asked Garda Flynn whether he had contacted Gulf Contrbl and was told that Garda Flynn
had tried but had failed. Garda Joy told him to try again ahd as he was doing so Garda joy,
on another phone, telephoned Superintendent McMahonVo report the incident.
Garda Flynn's second attempt to get through to Gulf ContrdJ was successful. He had a brief
57
conversation. Garcia Flynn asked the person to whom he was talking whether they wif
trouble, The voice answered—"Yes' . Garda Flynn asked did they need assistance andlS
told that they "needed all the assistance they could get". Garda Flynn shouted^]!
information to Garda Joy who was then talking on the other phone to Superintend
McMahon. It is clear that this c o n v e r s i o n with Gulf Control took place at approximatf
00.50 hours.
5.4.4 Superintendent McMahon was the D: strict Officer in charge of the Bantry district on tl
night of the disaster. He lives in a hous which is a mile (1.6 km) from the Station and wh'il
overlooks Bantry Bay. He has a clear view of Whiddy Island but can only see the top of tt
storage tanks at the terminal. Superintendent McMahon was asleep when Garda J o |
telephoned him. He cannot be sure of he time but places it between 00.45 and 00.55 hours!
In response to the information given to him by Garda Joy he looked out the window and hg
saw that the sky was lit up over WhicSdy and a huge column of smoke was rising over the!
Island. The fire was then of "gigantic1, proportions". He instructed Garda Joy to put thelf
major accident plan into operation andjbe then immediately drove to the Station. Just as he.--'
entered the Station he heard a huge explosion. He estimated that it would have taken him 5
approximately fourteen minutes to get] to the Station from the time he first received the
telephone call from Garda Joy,
The "Bilbao" did not berth at Bantry. A few days after the disaster Mr. Wong was
interviewed by the Amsterdam polici who took a statement from him. He did not read over
the statement and he stated to the Tribunal in evidence that parts of it were incorrect. The
statement read that he had informed \he Dutch police that he overheard someone saying
"the skip is on fire" but the witness was quite clear that he had not been so specific in his
statement. \
The voice which this witness heard on Channel 16 (which he described as "screaming")
was, quite clearly, that of the dispatcher Who used this Channel to alert the tug "Bantry
Bay" to the emergency, (see: paragraph a4.3).
SECTION 4 \
t
™raihunal. Miss Siobhan O'Sullivan had gone to bed at about\midnight on the night of the
anuary. She read in bed for some time. She noticed a "knocking noise". It was not very
loud but it was continuous. It seemed to her to be coming from the kitchen and she g6i%
investigate it. She then went back to bed and continued reading. Some time later she 1*.
what she then thought was thunder but which/ she is now satisfied must have bee'"
explosion. Then she heard a large explosion. Shejwent into her sister's room and saw L
of fire over Whiddy Island. The witness thoug it that she had been in bed about twen
minutes before the knocking sound started and or a further half an hour before the laif
explosion occurred. Miss Elizabeth O'Sullivan lad gone to bed but was only half a s j | f
when her attention was attracted by the restlessm ss of her dog, and by the fact that her i
had gone to the kitchen. About ten minutes late;- she heard a "loud hammering noise-—W
something you would Fiear in a blacksmith's". Tljiis lasted about two or three minutes. Thefe
were heavy bangs at first, which got more frequent and then became faint. After some
minutes she heard an explosion. She was not alarmed by this as she had heard similar
explosions on other occasions. Ten minutes latejr there was a louder explosion. Again, she
was not disturbed by this and she went asleep She was, however, awakened by a loud
explosion, the one "that blew the tanker". She gj>t out of bed and saw the sky was "glowing
orange red" and she saw a cloud of black sm^ke.
Whilst the estimates of time given by these twe witnesses are obviously very approximate,
their testimony is of importance in that it describes the sounds they heard—sounds which
obviously emanated from the "Betelgeuse". It confirms that there were at least two
explosions before the major explosion.
5.5.3 Mr. Jeremiah O'Riordan is a witness who recalls hearing unusual noises on the night of the
disaster, and the major explosion about ten miniites later, but hf cannot place any time when
these incidents occurred. Similarly, Mr. Timothy Murphy,,1 who lives in a caravan at
Ballylickey, recalls hearing very loud noises lik; a powerful engine, and later a "big blast",
but he cannot say the times these occurred. Likewise, Mrs Kathleen Lynch recalls hearing
strange noises followed by a minor explosion ; nd then by a big explosion, but cannot say
with any precision what time she heard these sounds. Miss Mary O'Brien, who lives at
Caherdaniel West, Bantry, had got to bed at about 00.55 hours. She remembered hearing
the loud explosion and the sound of the siren at Bantrv immediately afterwards but cannot
say what time these occurred. Mr. Stephen Osbbrne lives in a house near the water's edge at
Ardaturrish. He went to bed at about midnight and read for approximately half an hour. At
about 00.40 or 00.45 hours he remembers hearing a "small explosion or thunder or a
rumble" from the direction of Whiddy and five minutes later he heard another small
explosion or "thunder" and at "about one o'clock" he heard the massive explosion. He then
went to the front of the house and "got the i npression that Whiddy was on fire". From
there he was able to see the blaze at the Island. Whilst this witness cannot say precisely what
time the explosions occurred his evidence doe; help to establish that there were two small
explosions before the major explosion and thit these probably occurred some time after
00.45 hours,
Dr. Mary Hughes and Dr. Peter Hughes live at Derrycreha House at Glengarriff. On the
evening of the 7th of January they had a visito , Mr. Michael Harnett. As they were seeing
Mr. Harnett out of their home he called out tc them and as a result they went out and saw
that the whole sky was lit up. Neither Dr. M; ry Hughes nor Dr. Peter Hughes could say
exactly what the time was. They saw the ship it the jetty. Dr. Mary Hughes stated that the
fire was in the middle section of the ship. It was then a "raging inferno". Doctor Peter
Hughes was under the impression that the fire A'as on the tank farm. Miss Mary O'Sullivan
and Mr. William O'Sullivan live at Ardaturris , between Ballylickey and Glengarriff. Miss
Marv O'Sullivan went to bed at about 23.00 Hours on the night of the 7th of January. She
stated that she heard "banging noises" which wsnt on for some time and then she saw a very
bright light in the window. She got up and sa\* big flames" on the oil terminal. She woke
her parents and went with them to the lounge o their house. She stated that after a while she
looked at her watch and noticed the time as 0( .40 hours. She stayed watching the fire and
remembers the big explosion—at, she thinks, so me time after 01.00 hours. She saw flames on
the ship and all along the front of the Island. Si e said that "it was like as if the whole Island
was on fire". Mr. O'Sullivan remembers goin ; to bed and being awoken by his daughter
rushing into the room and saying "Daddy, W liddy Island is on fire". He thought that she
came into his room at 00.45 hours. From the de cription of the fire it would appear that it is
likely that they first saw it somewhere in the region of 00.40 to 00.45 hours.
Mrs. Marian Hurley lives at 75, Bishop Lucey Place in the town of Bantry. She remembered
that early in the morning of the 8th of January she was getting ready to go to bed and that
she was kneeling at the fire whan she heard a rumbling sound, a sound which later she
thought might have been the sound of a minor explosion. She then went upstairs and went
to the window of their spare bedroom. From there she observed the fire at Whiddy Island.
When she saw it, it was a very extensive one. She aroused her husband and they went to the
hall door. The smoke from the firs was then over their house. As she was at the door white
and black blobs of material began o fall around her (specimens of which were produced at
the hearing). After staying some vhile at her front door she then went down to visit a
neighbour, Mrs. Coughlan. She was in Mrs. Coughlan's house when she first heard an
explosion. It was a small one. Lat :r she heard what she described as a "huge" explosion,
Mrs. Hurlev's estimate of the time when she first saw the fire is obviouslv not an accurate
one. She stated that her clock w is ten minutes fast and that she saw the fire at 00.30
hours—which would mean that t le fire had started at 00.20 hours, if her testimony was
correct.
It would appear from her descriptic:n of what she saw when she went to the front door, and,
in particular, the position of the smoke over her house and the explosions which she
subsequently heard, that she must pave seen the fire for the first time when it reached its
second phase. Miss Mary Somers, vho lives at Derrycreha, could not be certain about the
time at which she heard an unusua noise. She thought that it was at about 00.30 hours and
she got the impression that there were cattle outside her house. She went to bed but
continued to hear noises intermitt intly which went on for about twenty minutes or so.
Finally she got out of bed at about 01.00 hours. She then saw the fire. She considered that
from half to three quarters of the t;nker was on fire. "A few seconds" after she had got up
she witnessed the big explosion. Mr Edgar Battle thought he saw the fire at 00.30 hours and
he thought the major explosion oc curred at 00.55 hours. Mrs. Millie Battle thought she
heard a siren from Whiddy Island at 00.30 hours but this would appear to be inaccurate as it
was not heard by any other witne; s at that or any later time.
j.4 Mr. Michael Carroll is the Managing Director of Carroll Shipping Limited. He was in bed
in the early hours of the 8th of January when he received a telephone call from the
dispatcher at Gulf Control. Mr. Connolly said "Is that you Mick? We have a fire out here.
Get everything you have out fast". Mr. Carroll said that he tried to get a connection by
telephone to the skippers of his boats ftut failed after trying for about five minutes. He then
decided to get up and as he was doinglso the main explosion occurred, an explosion which
shook the whole house. He went dowri to the pier and started up the "Sea Trakker", one of
the boats owned by hisjtompany. A Mr. Tommy Sullivan came on board and the witness
thought that Mr. John'Lynam also came on board. The last person to board the ship was
Captain Kelly, who came aboard just as they were going astern. As he was leaving the pier
he radioed to his wife at home and checked the time with her. The witness gave the times of
the various occurrences which he described but his recollection would appear to be
somewhat inaccurate. He considered that he received the telephone call from Mr. Connolly
at 00.48 hours. This may well be correct!but he stated that what he thought was "the main
explosion", which was followed immediately by the Bantry Fire Station siren, occurred at
00.55 hours (which is not correct). He stlted that as he was leaving the pier he checked the
time with his wife by radio and that it was 01.05 hours, but there is other evidence which
would suggest that the "Sea Trakker" dim not leave Bantry Pier until 01.12 hours; this will
be considered in Chapter 7.
Mrs. Cynthia Kilroy lives at Ballylickey She was awakened by her dog barking and she
looked out the window and she saw a rei 1 glow from the direction of Whiddy Island. She
looked at the fire from her window and remembers the terrific explosion which occurred.
She gave evidence to the effect that when she first turned on the light and saw the glow in
the sky the time was 00.30 hours.
Mrs. Helen Courcey lives on Whiddy Island and she returned from the mainland on the
morning of Monday the 8th of January at about 00.15 hours arriving at her own house at
approximately 00.35 hours. She recalls that at about 00.50 hours she heard a noise like
thunder. She then heard a banging noise and she then related how her brother, Barry
Desmond, ran in to notify ht^ of the emergency. Mr. Desmond stated "get up quick. John
Connolly is after telephoning tcisay there is a fire at the jetty and he needs help". Mrs.
Courcey is not able to state the times of these different occurrences with any accuracy. Mrs.
Catherine Evans lives in Wolfe Tope Square in the town of Bantry. She was in bed reading
on the night of the 7th/8th Januaryiand recalls hearing voices in the Square and her daughter
coming into the room to alert her tb the emergency. She got up and went into the Square at
between 01.00 and 01.05 hours, she thinks. When she went out she saw a "big cloud of
smoke" and "fire coming from t]^; direction of the terminal". She heard a number of minor
explosions, and she remembers the major explosion and she saw from the Square a massive
ball of fire ascend into the sky several hundred feet and heard the windows of her house
rattle. She is not, however, able to state with any precision what time this occurred. Miss
Kathleen Minihane, one of the supervisors in the Bantry Telephone Exchange, was at the
dance in the West Lodge Hotel on the night of the 7th/8th January. She observed the fire
from the hotel at about 01.05 hours. SHe realised that there was an emergency and she went
down to the Telephone Exchange immediately to help.
Mr. Maurice Goggin lives on the Island! but was not aware of the disaster until the major
explosion occurred. The noises which helheard in the evening were obviously unrelated to
the casualty. Mr. Vincent Harrington liVes at Gour, Castletownbere. He was travelling
home from visiting his sister on the night\of the disaster, and as he was at Gour Bridge he
obtained a view of Whiddy Island and he saw the fire. He was then a distance of about
fifteen miles (24 km) from the Island. He estimates that the time "was then about 00.45 hours,
an estimate based on the time he left his sister's house and the distance he had travelled before
he saw the fire. i
SECTION 5
5.6.1 The evidence o f the Post-mistress on Whiddy Island
Mrs. Catherine Desmond is the post-mistress im Whiddy Island. She did not actually see the
fire but her evidence is of importance in relation to two matters. On the night of Sunday the
7th of January she was expecting her son and daughter home by boat from Bantry. She went
out of her home to look to see if they wereYcoming. It was, she says, after midnight "at
approximately five minutes past twelve". She didn't see her son's boat but she saw the lights
of the "Donemark" as it pulled away from the pier. She had frequently seen the
"Donemark" and knew its lights well. As will appear later, there is a very considerable
controversy in this case as to the time the "Donemark" left Bantry Pier and Mrs. Desmond's
testimony helps in establishing that it was "pmlling out" from the Pier not long after
midnight. \
Mrs. Desmond's son and daughter arrived at about 00.20 hours. Having given them a cup of
tea she went to bed. The phone rang at 00.50 hours. She recalls the time exactly because her
husband said " W h o is ringing so late?" and she looked at the time and replied "It is ten
minutes to one". She saw the time from her alarmVclock. It was Mr. Connolly, from Gulf
Control, on the line. Mr. Connolly said to her than there was a tanker on fire and he asked
her to get her husband to come and help and to get Rome men to help also. Mrs. Desmond's
testimony, which was accurate and clear, conflicts with that of Mr. Connolly, whose
evidence is considered in the next Chapter. In that evidence he stated that he did not become
aware of the disaster until 00.55 hours. \
It should also be noted that Mrs. Desmond could cinly be contacted through the Bantry
Telephone Exchange. This means that the operator 1there must have received this call at
00.50 hours. The call to Mrs. Desmond would be Imv down on the dispatcher's order of
priorities and it is likely that calls to others had Seen made prior to the dispatcher's
conversation with her. \