Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Camilo Daleman C., Eliana Chavarro M., Immer Caicedo G. Mol Labs Ltda, Bogotá, Colombia
Camilo Daleman C., Eliana Chavarro M., Immer Caicedo G. Mol Labs Ltda, Bogotá, Colombia
16,00
14,00
12,00
10,00
8,00
mg Na/L
pH units
mg SO4-2/L
mg Ca/L
mg Cl-/L
6,00
14,0% 15,0% 4,00
9,31 6,2% 257,0%
5030,0%
12015,0%
12,0%
109,8 10
27,1% 55,7
45,3
21,6
51,7
10,0%
6,0%
7,68
100
10,0%
2,00
20
8
4025,0%
10,5%
10,0%
10,0%
78,1
6,43 5,0%
31
29,5
10,0% 0,00
10,0%
80
8,0%
20,0%
154,0%
6
30
5,3%
60
6,0%2,6%
15,0% 6,3%
103,0%6,8 5,1%
4
20
36,7
3,3%
5,0%
405,0%
4,0%
10,0%
5,7
2,0%
9,21 5,1% 3,5% 10
5
2
0,7%
20
2,0%
1,0%
5,0%
0,0%
00,0%
0
00,0%
00,0%
0,0%
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
Assigned Value RSD
L - LEAP I - IDEAM M - Mol
Fig 1. PTs in drinking water: assigned value in columns, is a reference for measurand
level in matrix. On RSD lines: LEAP (L) assign perception values with a trend to
10%; IDEAM (I) Schemes, based on RTC certified reference materials, shows lower
RSD in all the exercises. Mol Labs (M) consensus values has high dispersion.
20
17,5%
44,3% 650,0%
12,0%
16,8
5,3
1,15
10,0%
100014,0%
1,06
40010,0% 13,2% 358,6
540,0%
789 15 12,0%
10,0%
12,6%
4,02
350 10,0%
12,0%
10,0%
8,5%
0,839
800
430,0%
3008,0%
10,0%
7,4%
10,0%
8,0%
5,7%250
10
7,3% 6008,0%
3
6,0%
6,0%
200 144
20,0%
6,1
6,0%
3,1%
400
2
1504,0%
10,0%
4,0%
5
3,55
4,0%
0,836
1002,0%
5,1%
200
110,0%
2,0%
29,4
2,0%88 36,8
50
00,0%
0 0,0%
00,0%
00,0%
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
L
I
M
Assigned Value RSD
L - LEAP I - IDEAM M - Mol
20,0%
15,0%
10,0%
0,0%
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
0
0,0%
0
B
0,5%
50
0,0%
0
B - BIPEA
5,0%
0,0%
M
Assigned Value
M - Mol Labs
RSD
Fig 3. Vegetable oil PTs: BIPEA (B) and Mol Labs (M). Consensus values on RSD.
Low differences between far away exercises. Mol Labs FAMES exercise has few (less
than 15) participants.
Moisture as g/100g
70
60
59,62
63,06
50
40
30
20
10
0,9%
1,1%
0
F
Ash as g/100g
gN/100g
20,0%
4
3,50
2,93
3,5
3,7%
15,0%
3,4%
3
2,5
10,0%
2
1,5
5,0%
1
0,5
0,0%
0
F
M
F - FAPAS M - Mol Labs
18
5,0%
16
14
4,0%
12
10
3,0%
8
2,0%
6
4
1,0%
2
0
0,0%
15,96
7,5%
13,0
20,0%
20
9,0%
16,29*
7,0%
15
15,0%
5,0%
10
3,0%
4,0%
1,0%5
F
M
Assigned Value
10,0%
3,51
1,8%
5,3%
-1,0%0
M
RSD
Fig 4. PT in canned meat: FAPAS (F) perception values and Mol Labs (M) consensus.
Not so different values at > 17 participants in every measurand. But, Nitrogen measure
is out of set.
Total glycerin as g/100g
Density as g/mL
1
0,88537
0,8751
0,8
0,2%0,15
0,6
0,1% 0,1
0,4
0,2
0,2% 0,2
0,024%
0,125
17,6%
13,0%
0,1%0,05
0,011%
0
ASTM
0,17
0,0% 0
Mol Labs
A - ASTM
ASTM
M - Mol
Mol Labs
0,0623
50,0%
0,04
6,8%
Assigned Value
105,66 NR
115,20 2,46
115,20 0,28
60,0%
[2] LEAP. Scheme Report EFF025. Effluent & Waste Water. May 2011.
50,0%
40,0%
30,0%
[4] FAPAS. Report 018. Nutritional components in canned meat. October 2012.
20,0%
[5] ASTM. Committee D-2 Biodiesel Fuels Sample ID: BIOD1108. August 2011
10,0%
0,0%
ASTM
Water as g/100g
0,0700
40,0%
35,0%
0,0600
30,0%
0,0500
25,0%
0,0400
20,0%
0,0300
15,0%
0,0200
10,0%
0,0100
5,0%
0,0000
0,0%
5,0%
0,0%
2013
105,10 0,70
20,0%
10,0%
2,8%
2012
L201
1,9
150
1,0%
100
2011
15,0%
10,8
2010
L200
192,6
1,6%
2009
L450
190,5
15,1
15,9%
-0,06
L188
19,1%
200
1,5%
2,5%
16
14
2,0%
12
10
1,5%
8
1,0%
6
4
0,5%
2
0
0,0%
2013
0,70 0,58
0,29
103,81 0,20
28,8%
1,2%
2,0%
0,48 0,73
L908
10
115,1
2,0%
250
2012
100,59 8,11
12
11,8
140
50,0% 1,7%
120
40,0%
100
82,2
80
30,0%
60
20,0%
40
10,0%
20
2011
-0,6
L228
14
0,97
0,14
g FAME*/100 g
mg KOH/kg
mg I2/kg
2,0%
2,65
Fig 2. PTs in wastewater: LEAP (L) assign 10%, IDEAM RSD from reference
materials looks lower in every exercise, relative to the measurand level; Mol Labs (M)
consensus can be showing technical competence from the laboratories.
mEq O2/kg
5,3%
RSD
5,0%
12,49
MBAS mg/L
TSS as mg/L
2010
16,29
106,80 NR
COD as mg O2/L
Assigned Value
L922
1,4
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
mg Cu/L
2009
2014
107,00 8,45
mg Cd/L
2013
L765
2012
109,00 NR
10
2011
L884
20
2010
106,94 2,44
30
2009
L46
40
18
10,0%
16,31
13,4%
8,3% 16
13,40
8,0%12,57
14
11,01
10,30 9,60 12
9,2%
9,25 5,5%
6,0%
5,0%
10
8
3,7%
4,0%
5,51
6
2,4%
3,4%
4
2,0%
2
0
0,0%
104,21 NR
50
9,4%
13,68
L101
60
ISO Standard 13528:2005 defines five procedures to establish an assigned value and
another five to estimate the RSD for the measurand to be used in a PT evaluation. The
selection makes a difference between providers, but matrix and measurement level also
contributes.
Mol Labs
RSD
Fig 5. PT in Biodiesel Fuels: ASTM (A) and Mol Labs. Less significant figures and
high RSD for measurements from Colombia. Technological (equipment) difference?.
16,0%
14,0%
12,0%
10,0%
8,0%
6,0%
4,0%
2,0%
0,0%