Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Surface Treatment of Fibre
Surface Treatment of Fibre
Surface Treatment of Fibre
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering (MTM), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Universit Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 8 November 2010
Received in revised form
20 December 2010
Accepted 6 January 2011
Available online 18 January 2011
Keywords:
Natural bres
Coir
Wilhelmy
Wetting
Surface energy
XPS
a b s t r a c t
Vietnam grown coir bres have been studied for use in composite materials. In order to understand the
brematrix interfacial compatibility, it is necessary to investigate the wetting behaviour and surface
chemistry of the bres. The aim of this paper is to develop a wetting measurement procedure to determine stable and reproducible advancing static contact angles, and estimate the bre surface energy.
Dynamic contact angles are measured using the Wilhelmy technique. The experiments are carried out by
considering the effects on the contact angle results of irregular wetted perimeter along the bre and liquid
absorption, which commonly appear with natural bres. Dynamic wetting of coir bres is then modelled
using the Molecular-kinetic theory from which the advancing static contact angle can be approximated
by tting dynamic data. Besides, advancing static contact angle was determined experimentally using an
approach derived from the Wilhelmy technique, in which the relaxation of the liquid meniscus was monitored after stopping the bre movement. There is a good agreement between advancing static angles
from the experimental and modelling method. The bre surface energy comprising polar and dispersive components is estimated following the Owens/Wendt approach using the advancing static contact
angle of various test liquids. The bre surface chemistry examined by XPS shows a carbon rich surface
consisting of waxes and a low proportion of lignin and fatty substances. From the results of the wetting
measurements and surface characterisation, the coir bre surface seems to be hydrophobic.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Natural bres such as ax, jute, sisal, coir, hemp and bamboo
have been used as reinforcement in polymer composites during
the last decades. They are available in large amounts, at low cost,
have low energy utilisation and are renewable and biodegradable.
In most cases the specic properties of the natural bre composites
were found to compare favourably with those of glass bre composite [1]. Among natural bres, coir bres have low density ranging
from 1.0 to 1.3 g/cm3 and high strain to failure up to approximately
40%. This has the potential to ameliorate the toughness when they
are used in composite [2].
In composite materials, the interfacial properties of bre and
matrix play an important role in the nal mechanical performance.
The interactions at the interface generally consist of physical
adhesion, chemical bonding and mechanical interlocking. A good
physical adhesion is controlled by good wetting between bres and
matrices, which is strongly dependent on the surface energies of the
materials. Studying bre wettability with different probe liquids
provides an understanding of bre hydrophilicity and bre surface polarity. Surface energies determine the interactions between
materials, and contact angles are the result of such interactions.
Hence, measurement of contact angles and surface energies leads
to a prediction of the compatibility of bre and matrix.
Wetting is the consequence of the change in nature of interfaces
driven by free energy minimisation [3]. The quantitative measure
of solidliquid interactions is the contact angle. The equilibrium
contact angle dened by Young [4] at the intersection of the three
phases, gasliquidsolid, was initially developed for a drop of liquid
on a smooth solid surface. In case of a single bre, contact angles
are reported to be measured either directly or indirectly, typically
by using the modied Wilhelmy technique [57]. The direct technique is carried out by introducing a drop of liquid on the bre. The
contact angle is usually calculated following the theoretical model
proposed by Carroll [8], Yamaki and Katayama [9]. Some difculties are observed experimentally, such as improper drop making
and high curvature variation at the interface. For the indirect way,
the Wilhelmy technique is usually recommended. The principle is
to use a microbalance to record the wetting force, which is the capillary force exerted by the liquid on the bre. The contact angle
is then deduced from the recorded force in relation to the liquid
surface tension and the bre perimeter.
252
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
advancing
hysteresis
receding
-v
Besides the consideration of measurement techniques, wetting measurements on plant bres present additional complexities,
which are typically not found for synthetic bres and which
may affect the measurement: liquid absorption/diffusion into the
surface layers/cell walls; diffusion of low-molecular-weight compounds from the surface layers into the liquid; physico-chemical
heterogeneity of the constituents (e.g., cellulose, hemicelluloses,
and lignin) of the surface layers; viscoelastic response of the surface
layers to the liquid [10].
In some specic studies, the measurement of the contact angle
is performed in dynamic conditions. There, the wetting of a liquid
on a solid surface is commonly known as the moving of the threephase line or wetting line across the surface of the solid. Associated
with this moving wetting line, dynamic contact angles and wetting
velocity are the main parameters used to quantify the dynamics
of wetting. It is experimentally reported that the dynamic contact
angle is usually found to depend on both the speed and the direction
of the wetting line displacement. The dynamic angles differ from
the corresponding static value and may refer to either an advancing
or receding interface. The measured angle will depend on the history of the system and varies according to whether the interface is
being advanced or receded. This phenomenon is known as contact
angle hysteresis (Fig. 1), and occurs in most real systems where
solid surfaces are often rough and chemically heterogeneous. In
this complex situation, the static contact angle is even unlikely to
be single-valued, but may show advancing and receding limits
[11,12].
The bre surface chemistry provides important information on
the chemical functionality that determines the interactions with
the chemical functionality of the matrix. The level of hydrophilicity and the surface energy of bres are also the result of chemical
groups on the surface. For surface chemical characterisation, Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has shown to be a useful
tool to investigate the surface chemistry of several kinds of cellulose bres, which assists to determine a quantitative elemental
composition and certain functional groups present on the surface
[1417].
In this paper, dynamic contact angle measurements of coir
bres with different probe liquids are carried out based on the
Wilhelmy technique. Advancing static contact angle approximation is conducted by application of the Molecular-kinetic theory
and by using a modied Wilhelmy method. PET bres are also
examined as reference and to evaluate the employed methods.
Coir bre advancing static contact angles are used to estimate the
bre surface energy following the OwensWendt approach. XPS is
used to analyse the bre surface chemistry, linked with the wetting results, to obtain a deeper understanding of the coir bre
surface.
Several studies of dynamic wetting, centred on using the contact angle as a geometrical boundary condition for the moving
uid/uid1 interface at the solid surface, are described elsewhere
[11]. For the aim of this study, the Molecular-kinetic theory of
dynamic wetting is applied to study the relation between the
dynamic contact angle and the static contact angle.
According to the Molecular-kinetic theory [18], the macroscopic
behaviour of the wetting line depends on the overall statistics of the
individual molecular displacements that occur within the threephase zone. The wetting line is modelled by the displacements of
length of the molecules from one adsorption site to another. The
molecules can move forward with a frequency K+ , or backward with
a frequency K . The net frequency is Knet = K+ K . Then the velocity
of the wetting line is given by v = Knet . At equilibrium, v = 0, Knet
is zero and K+ = K = K0 . Blake and Haynes assumed that the driving
force for the wetting line is the out-of-balance surface tension force
LV (cos 0 cos ) where LV is the surface tension of the liquid
in contact with vapour, 0 is the static contact angle and is the
dynamic contact angle. Using Eyrings theory of absolute reaction
rates for transport in liquids gave the nal relationship between
and v as:
(cos 0 cos )
v = 2K0 sinh LV
2nkB T
(1)
where n is the number of adsorption sites per unit area, kB is Boltzmanns constant, T is the temperature.
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
253
Fig. 2. SEM images of coir cross-section and coir surface: (a) organic residues on coir surface, (b) clean surface, (c) bre cross-section, and (d) longitudinally orientated cells.
(2)
(3)
The contact angle was then calculated from the received force
data at any depth. For both advancing and receding processes, the
obtained angles were called advancing contact angle and receding
contact angle respectively. Due to the effect of coir bre surface
roughness, the receding angles were apparently not stable. Therefore, only the advancing contact angles were studied.
The measurements were performed at a temperature of 20 C
and humidity of approximately 60%. Different measurement speeds
ranging from 2 m/s to 8000 m/s were used to study both
dynamic wetting and static contact angle approximation, the latter
is described in the following parts of this paper. The immersion
depth used for experiments was from 2 mm to 5 mm depending on the applied measurement speeds. As mentioned, water,
(4)
Following Eq. (4), the bre wetted perimeter, p, can be determined from the wetting force and liquid surface tension. Thus,
in principle, the bre wetted perimeter can be measured at any
position along the bre.
Another method was also carried out to make a comparison.
The microscope images of cross-sections of bre samples were then
examined by image analysis. For each bre, images of various crosssections were taken by a scanning electron microscope (SEM 30 XL
FEG). With help of the software Leica Qwin, the contour of each
cross-section was determined.
3.2.2. Estimation of the effect of liquid absorption
Using the electrobalance of the tensiometer, the bre sample was weighed before and after the wetting measurement. The
absorbed mass into the bre was determined to analyse the effect
on the nal contact angle results. The experiments were carried out
with the three test liquids.
Table 1
Summary of surface tension, density, viscosity and purity of test liquids used in this paper; p is the polar and d is the dispersive component of the surface tension according
to the OwensWendt analysis.
Test liquid
(mN/m)
p (mN/m)
d (mN/m)
(g/cm3 )
(mPas)
Purity
Supplier
n-Hexane
Diiodomethane
Benzyl alcohol
Ultrapure water
18.4
50.8
39.0
72.8
0
0
8.7
51.0
18.4
50.8
30.3
21.8
0.659
3.32
1.04
0.998
0.32
2.76
8.0
1
99.6%
>98%
>99.5%
18.2 cm resistivity
Acros
Merck
Acros
Millipore
254
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
d
SV = SV
+ SV
(5)
Fig. 3. Typical sorption measurement curves in water of coir bres having different
perimeters, showing that static equilibrium is reached after approximately 200 s.
d d +
SV
LV
SV LV )
(6)
d
LV
=
p
SV
LV
d
LV
+
d
SV
(7)
If one has obtained contact angle data on the bre for a series
of test liquids with known surface tension components, the two
d and p are simultaneously solved by linear tting
unknowns SV
SV
using Eq. (7), referred to as the OwensWendt equation.
3.5. Fibre surface characterization using X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS analyses were performed on a Kratos Axis Ultra spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, UK) equipped with a monochromatized
aluminium X-ray source (powered at 10 mA and 15 kV).
One single bre was cantilevered xed on a at stainless steel
trough with a piece of double sided isolative tape. This way of
mounting insured that the bre surface only was analysed but not
its surrounding. The troughs, holding each bre sample, were then
inserted in the multispecimen holder. The pressure in the analysis
chamber was about 106 Pa. The angle between the normal to the
sample surface and the direction of photoelectrons collection was
about 0 . Analyses were performed in the hybrid lens mode with
the slot aperture and the iris drive position set at 0.5, the resulting analysed area was 700 m 300 m. The pass energy of the
hemispherical analyser was set at 160 eV for the survey scan and
40 eV for narrow scans. In the latter conditions, the full width at half
maximum (FWHM) of the Ag 3d5/2 peak of a standard silver sample was about 0.9 eV. Charge stabilisation was achieved by using the
Kratos Axis Ultra device. The electron source was operated with a
lament current between 1.9 and 2.1 A and a bias of 1.1 eV. The
charge balance plate was set between 3.3 and 3.9 V.
The following sequence of spectra was recorded: survey spectrum, C 1s, O 1s, N 1s, Ca 2p, Si 2p, and C 1s again to check for charge
stability as a function of time and the absence of degradation of the
sample during the analysis. The C(C, H) component of the C 1s peak
of carbon was xed to 284.8 eV to set the binding energy scale.
The data analysis was performed with the CasaXPS program
(Casa Software Ltd., UK). Mole fractions were calculated using
peak areas normalised on the basis of acquisition parameters
after a linear background subtraction and consideration of experimental sensitivity factors and transmission factors (depending on
kinetic energy, analyser pass energy and lens combination) provided by the manufacturer. C 1s spectra were decomposed with a
Gaussian/Lorentzian (70/30) product function, by constraining the
FWHMs of all components to be equal.
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
Table 2
Fibre wetted perimeter (mm) from different methods.
0.018
Force (mN)
255
0.016
Fibre
Fibre no.
Coir
1
2
3
4
5
Methods
n-Hexane wetting
0.014
y = -0.0002x + 0.0157
R2 = 0.8676
0.012
PET
0.715
0.442
0.913
0.777
0.952
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.004
2.621 0.002
Image analysis
0.767
0.462
0.961
0.799
0.982
0.014
0.027
0.027
0.043
0.042
2.549 0.022
0.01
0
10
12
position (mm)
Fig. 4. A typical wetting forceposition curve in the experiment determining bre
wetted perimeter using n-Hexane.
Unmodied coir as used in the wetting measurements and modied coir were characterised. A surface modication procedure of
coir was carried out by soaking unmodied coir in n-Hexane for
24 h at ambient temperature, followed by washing with deionised
water, then drying under vacuum at 90 C for 2 h.
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Wetting measurements
4.1.1. Fibre wetted perimeter
Fig. 4. shows a typical plot of wetting force vs. immersion position during a wetting measurement of coir bre in n-Hexane. The
extrapolated value of the force at the position of zero immersion
depth was used for calculating the wetted perimeter (at zero buoyancy). In Fig. 5, an image of a coir bre cross-section was examined,
in which bre wetted perimeter is the sum of the bre contour and
the contour of the bre lacuna. It is reported that a lacuna occurs
in coir bres with different sizes depending on bre diameter and
position along the bre and that it would be bigger in thicker bres.
The lumen of single bre cells (elementary bres) has length and
width in ranges of 0.711.06 mm and 0.01070.0142 mm respectively [22,23]. Therefore, the effect of the lumens on the wetting
Fig. 5. Image analysis of bre cross-section using the software Leica Qwin to determine bre wetted length.
256
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
Fig. 6. Typical dynamic contact angle measurements of coir and PET bres.
110
contact angle ( 0)
100
90
80
70
60
contact angle ( 0)
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
2000
4000
6000
velocity (m/s)
8000
10000
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
water
diiodomethane
benzyl alcohol
MKT fitting
Table 3
The effect of absorbed liquid into coir bre on its dynamic contact angle with various test uids; mass range is presented due to different perimeter of test samples.
Liquids
Absorption (%)
Water
Diiodomethane
Benzyl alcohol
5.2 1.1
5.0 2.1
14.4 5.8
Absorbed mass
(mg) (range)
0.0130.023
0.0120.019
0.0210.073
Mass created by
wetting (mg)
(range)
0.1750.956
0.6981.986
1.3663.225
Contact angle ( )
Contact angle
variation ( )
Number of samples
82.9 4.4
54.4 2.4
24.3 3.6
0.2 0.1
0.3 0.1
1.9 0.9
5
5
5
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
100
90
100
90
contact angle ( 0)
contact angle ( 0)
110
257
80
70
60
50
40
30
80
70
60
50
40
20
1
10
100
1000
10
100
1000
70
60
contact angle ( 0)
60
contact angle ( 0)
50
50
40
30
20
40
30
20
10
10
0
0
1
10
100
1000
10
100
1000
Fig. 9. Advancing contact angles () and static contact angles corresponding to different measurement speeds in dynamic phase () of (a) coir in water (b) PET in water (c)
coir in diiodomethane (d) coir in benzyl alcohol.
258
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
Table 4
Summary of advancing static contact angles in different test liquids, and estimated surface energy of coir bre according to 3 methods to determine the andvancing static
contact angles.
Advancing static contact angle ( )
Methods
MKT t
Wilhelmy static approximation
Water
Diiodomethane
Benzyl alcohol
Total
Polar
Dispersive
77.3 0.3
75.6 5.9
74.9 1.2
48.2 0.3
50.9 2.1
50.6 0.7
25.1 0.6
26.1 3.1
26.5 0.5
38.8 3.8
38.4 4.0
38.7 4.4
5.7 1.5
6.9 1.8
7.2 2.0
33.1 3.5
31.5 3.6
31.5 4.0
on the coir bre can be obtained from three different ways (MKT
tting, W1 and W2), the surface energies were calculated using data
of three above described methods.
Considering the series of contact angles obtained from the different methods, the total surface energy of coir bre is around
38.5 mN/m with a high dispersive fraction of 3133 mN/m. The
surface energy is close to the range often quoted for hydrophobic
materials (from 28 to 34 mN/m) [24]. Several studies on coir bres
indicate that mainly waxes exist on the coir surface. Moreover, the
coir surface demonstrates the presence of longitudinally orientated
cells with more or less parallel orientations as seen in Fig. 2c. The
intercellular space is lled up by the binder lignin and fatty substances that hold cells rmly bonded in the bre [25,26]. Thus, the
surface energy of coir should be inuenced by a combination of
waxes, fatty substances and lignin. Bartell and Zuidema provide
values of the surface tension dispersive part of waxes of 26.5 mN/m
and for the polar part values of zero [27], while the surface energy
Fig. 11. Typical C 1s spectra, decomposed into four components C1C4 for (a) unmodied coir (b) n-Hexane modied coir.
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
259
Table 5
Relative atomic percentages, O/C ratio, and decomposition of C 1s peaks obtained by XPS on unmodied and modied coir bres.
Fibres
C (%)
O (%)
N (%)
Si (%)
O/C
286.3 0.1
287.5 0.3
288.8 0.1
C1 (%)
C2 (%)
C3 (%)
C4 (%)
(CC/CH)
(CO)
(C O/OCO)
(OC O)
Unmodied coir
74.9 3.3
21.8 4.5
1.7 0.4
0.9 0.7
0.29 0.07
66.2 10.4
23.1 5.9
6.2 3.0
4.5 2.4
69.7 1.4
26.6 1.5
3.1 0.5
0.4 0.1
0.38 0.03
53.0 1.0
30.2 0.8
9.2 0.6
7.6 0.9
[2] N. Defoirdt, S. Biswas, L. De Vries, L.Q.N. Tran, J. Van Acker, Q. Ahsan, L. Gorbatikh, A. Van Vuure, I. Verpoest, Assessment of the tensile properties of coir,
bamboo and jute bre, Composites A 41 (2010) 588595.
[3] R.J. Stokes, D. Fennell Evans, Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering, Wiley,
John & Sons, Incorporated, 1996.
[4] T. Young, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. 95 (1805) 6587.
[5] C.V. Le, N.G. Ly, M.G. Steven, Measuring the contact angles of liquid droplets
on wood bers and determining surface energy components, Text. Res. J. 66
(1996) 389397.
[6] J.L.G. Silva, H.A. Al-Quresshi, Mechanics of wetting systems of natural bres
with polymeric resin, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 124 (1999) 9293.
[7] I. Aranberri-Askargorta, T. Lampke, A. Bismarck, Wetting behavior of ax
bers as reinforcement for polypropylene, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 263 (2003)
580589.
[8] B.J. Carroll, The accurate measurment of contact angle, phase contact area,
drop volume, and La Place excess pressure in drop-on-bre system, J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 57 (1976) 488495.
[9] J. Yamaki, Y. Katayama, New method of determining contact angle between
monolament and liquid, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 19 (1975) 28972909.
[10] S. Barsberg, L.G. Thygesen, Nonequilibrium phenomena inuencing the wetting
behavior of plant bres, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 234 (2001) 5967.
[11] T.D. Blake, in: J.C. Berg (Ed.), Wettability, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993.
[12] T.D. Blake, The physics of moving wetting lines, Colloid Interface Sci. 299 (2006)
113.
[13] E.B.V Dussan, On the spreading of liquid on solid surfaces: static and dynamic
contact lines, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11 (1979) 371400.
[14] M.N. Belgacem, G. Czeremuszkin, S. Sapieha, A. Gandini, Surface characterization of cellulose bres by XPS and inverse gas chromatography, Cellulose 2
(1995) 145157.
[15] L.-S. Johansson, J. Campbell, K. Koljonen, M. Kleen, J. Buchert, On surface distributions in natural cellulosic bres, Surf. Interface Anal. 36 (2004) 706710.
[16] N. Sgriccia, M.C. Hawley, M. Misra, Characterization of natural ber surface and
natural ber composite, Composites A 39 (2008) 16321637.
[17] T. Topalovic, V.A. Nierstrasz, L. Bautista, D. Jocic, A. Navarro, M.M.C.G. Warmoeskerken, XPS and contact angle study of cotton surface oxidation by
catalytic bleaching, Colloids Surf. A 296 (2007) 7685.
[18] T.D. Blake, J.M. Haynes, Kinetics of liquid/liquid displacement, Colloid Interface
Sci. 30 (1969) 421423.
[19] C. Rulison, So you want to measure surface energy? Kruss Technical Note #306,
Kruss USA.
[20] M.J. Vega, C. Gouttire, D. Seveno, T.D. Blake, M. Voue, J. De Coninck, Experimental investigation of the link between static and dynamic wetting by forced
wetting of nylon lament, Am. Chem. Soc. (2007).
[21] D.K. Owens, R.C. Wendt, Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers, J.
Appl. Polym. Sci. 13 (1969) 17411747.
[22] J.E.J. van Dam, M.J.A. van den Oever, E.R.P. Keijsers, J.C. van der Putten, C.
Anayron, F. Josol, A.G. Peralta, Process for production of high density/high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk. Part 2: coconut husk
morphology, composition and properties, Ind. Crops Prod. 24 (2006) 96104.
[23] W.A. Jensen, Botanical Histochemistry: Principles and Practice, W.H. Freeman,
San Francisco, 1962.
[24] J.M. van Hazendonk, J.C. van der Putten, J.T.F. Keurentjes, A. Prins, A simple
experimental method for the measurement of the surface tension of cellulosic
bres and its relation with chemical composition, Colloids Surf. A 81 (1993)
251261.
[25] J. Rout, S.S. Tripathy, S.K. Nayak, M. Misra, A.K. Mohanty, Scanning electron
microscopy study of chemically modied coir bres, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 79
(2001) 11691177.
[26] A. Bismarck, A.K. Mohanty, I. Aranberrri-Askargorta, S. Czapla, M. Misra, G.
Hinrichsen, J. Springer, Surface characterization of natural bers; surface properties and the water up-take behavior of modied sisal and coir bers, Green
Chem. 3 (2001) 100107.
[27] F.E. Bartell, H.H. Zuidema, Wetting characteristics of solids of low surface tension such as talc, waxes and resins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57 (1936) 14491454.
[28] S.B. Lee, P. Luner, The wetting and interfacial properties of lignin, Tappi 55
(1972) 116.
[29] S. Panthapulakkal, M. Sain, Agro-residue reinforced high-density polyethylene
composites: ber characterization and analysis of composite properties, Composites A 38 (2007) 14451454.
[30] G.M. Dorris, D.G. Grey, The surface analysis of paper and wood bers by ESCA. I.
Application to cellulosics and lignin, Cellulose Chem. Technol. 12 (1978) 923.
260
L.Q.N. Tran et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 377 (2011) 251260
[31] G.M. Dorris, D.G. Grey, The surface analysis of paper and wood bers by ESCA.
II. Surface composition of mechanical pulp, Cellulose Chem. Technol. 12 (1978)
721734.
[32] J.E.J. van Dam, M.J.A. van den Oever, W. Teunissen, E.R.P. Keijsers, A.G. Peralta, Process for production of high density/high performance binderless boards
from whole coconut husk. Part 1: lignin as intrinsic thermosetting binder resin,
Ind. Crops Prod. 19 (2004) 207216.
[33] M. Kazayawoko, J.J. Balatinecz, R.N.S. Sodhi, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
of maleated polypropylene treated with wood bers in the high intensity
thermokinetic mixer, Wood Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 359372.